Asthma exacerbations among asthmatic children receiving live attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccines

ObjectiveTo investigate whether there is a difference in the risk of asthma exacerbations between children with pre-existing asthma who receive live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) compared with inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV).Material and methodsWe identified IIV and LAIV immunizations occurring between July 1, 2007 and March 31, 2014 among Kaiser Permanente Northern California members aged 2 to <18 years with a history of asthma, and subsequent asthma exacerbations seen in the inpatient or Emergency Department (ED) setting. We calculated the ratio of the odds (OR) of an exacerbation being in the risk interval (1–14 days) versus the comparison interval (29–42 days) following immunization, separately for LAIV and IIV, and then examined whether the OR differed between children receiving LAIV and those receiving IIV (“difference-in-differences”).ResultsAmong 387,633 immunizations, 85% were IIV and 15% were LAIV. Children getting LAIV vs. IIV were less likely to have “current or recent, persistent” asthma (25% vs. 47%), and more likely to have “remote history” of asthma (47% vs. 25%). Among IIV-vaccinated asthmatic children, the OR of an inpatient/ED asthma exacerbation was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.82–1.15). Among LAIV-vaccinated asthmatic children the OR was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.17–0.90). In the difference-in-differences analysis, the odds of asthma exacerbation following LAIV were less than IIV (Ratio of ORs: 0.40, CI: 0.17–0.95, p value: 0.04).ConclusionAmong children ≥2 years old with asthma, we found no increased risk of asthma exacerbation following LAIV or IIV, and a decreased risk following LAIV compared to IIV.     

Influenza vaccination type,live, attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) versus inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV), received by children,United States, 2011−12 through 2013−14 influenza seasons

BackgroundInfluenza vaccines available for children in the United States include inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) and live, attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV). Objectives of this study were to quantify proportions of IIV and LAIV received by vaccinated children, and examine associations between vaccine type received and demographic characteristics.MethodsNational Immunization Survey-Flu (NIS-Flu) parental reported data for the 2011−12 through 2013−14 influenza seasons were used to estimate proportions of vaccinated children 2−17 years who received IIV and LAIV. Tests of association between vaccination type and demographic variables were conducted using Wald chi-square tests and pair-wise comparison t-tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine variables independently associated with receipt of LAIV versus IIV.ResultsIn the 2013−14 season, 33.3% of vaccinated children received LAIV, similar to the proportion in the 2011−12 (32.2%) and 2012−13 (32.1%) seasons. Across all seasons studied, the strongest observed association was between vaccination type and child's age, with children 2−8 years (Adjusted Prevalence Ratio (95% confidence interval) [APR(95% CI)] 1.41(1.27−1.56), 1.46(1.34−1.59), and 1.50(1.38−1.63) for 2011−12, 2012−13, and 2013−14) and 9−12 years (APR(95% CI) 1.37(1.23−1.54), 1.38(1.26−1.51), and 1.50(1.38−1.63) for 2011−12, 2012−13, and 2013−14) being more likely to have received LAIV than children 13−17 years. Among those vaccinated, whites were more likely to have received LAIV compared with blacks (APR(95% CI) 1.19(1.05−1.35), 1.24(1.10−1.39), and 1.22(1.11−1.34) for 2011−12, 2012−13, and 2013−14), and children living above poverty (annual income >$75,000) were more likely to have received LAIV than those living at or below poverty (APR(95% CI) 1.43(1.23−1.67), 1.13(1.02−1.26), and 1.16(1.06−1.28) for 2011−12, 2012−13, and 2013−14).ConclusionsThis study provides a baseline of the extent and patterns of LAIV uptake that can be used to measure the impact of relevant public health policy. Additional research is needed to investigate parental and provider preferences and barriers regarding LAIV.     

Influenza vaccines effectiveness 2013–14 through 2015–16, a test-negative study in children

BackgroundTrivalent inactivated and live attenuated influenza vaccines (IIV3 and LAIV3) have been reformulated with an extra B strain (IIV4 and LAIV4). They were licensed based on immunogenicity and their effectiveness (VE) still must be empirically tested.MethodsChildren 1–17 years tested for influenza during 2013–16 were included and their immunization status verified. They were considered vaccinated if received ≥1 dose of an influenza vaccine ≥10 days before evaluated for a respiratory episode. Age-groups were classified as 1–4 years or 5–17 years. VE was estimated by comparing vaccination status of influenza-positive versus influenza-negative cases.Results6779 children were enrolled in the three seasons. Overall, 27.2% received an influenza vaccine (87.1% IIV3 or IIV4 and 12.9% LAIV4), and 15.6% tested positive for influenza (77.9% A). IIV3 was predominantly used in 2013–14 and IIV4 in 2014–15 and 2015–16. IIV3 and IIV4 had comparable VE over the three seasons (60%, 57% and 53%) and performed similarly against influenza A and B and both age-groups. LAIV4 performed poorly for influenza A (15%, 37% and 48%) but better for influenza B (100%, 56% and 100%), especially among children 5–17 years of age with VE = 100% (95%CI: 55, 100).ConclusionsInfluenza vaccination showed modest but consistent effectiveness over the years. The switch from IIV3 to IIV4 did not affect VE. LAIV4 did not perform as well as IIVs, yet it improved over the years and was particularly good protecting older children against influenza B. These results emphasize the regional nature of influenza and the need for local surveillance.     

Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity antibody responses to inactivated and live-attenuated influenza vaccination in children during 2014–15

BackgroundSeasonal influenza vaccines aim to induce strain-specific neutralizing antibodies. Non-neutralizing antibodies may be more broadly cross-reactive and still protect through mechanisms including antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). Influenza vaccines may stimulate ADCC antibodies in adults, but whether they do so in children is unknown. Here we examined how vaccination affects cross-reactive ADCC antibody responses in children after receipt of inactivated trivalent vaccine (IIV3) or quadrivalent live-attenuated vaccine (LAIV4).MethodsChildren aged 5–17 were recruited in fall 2014 to provide pre- and post-vaccination serum samples. Children aged 5–9 received LAIV4 based on then-current recommendation, and older children were randomly assigned to IIV3 or LAIV4. We used microtiter-plate-based flow cytometry with an NK cell line to examine ADCC antibody responses to the 2014–15 H3N2 vaccine component (A/Texas/50/2012 [TX12]) and a drifted strain, A/Switzerland/9715293/2013 (SW13). Responses were stratified by two-season (2013–14 and 2014–15) vaccine sequence.ResultsEighty-five children received LAIV4 and 45 received IIV3. Prevaccination ADCC activity was highest in children who had received any vaccine in the prior season. Increase in ADCC antibody responses against the vaccine strain TX12 following vaccination was greatest for participants who received IIV3 in 2014–15 and LAIV4 in the prior season (geometric mean fold rise [MFR] = 1.6, 95% CI.1.23–2.11). This group also had a detectable ADCC response to the drifted SW13 strain. There was a modest ADCC response against SW13 in LAIV4 recipients who were unvaccinated in the previous season (MFR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.10–1.25). There were no significant changes in 2014–15 ADCC response to vaccination among children who had received IIV3 in 2013–14.ConclusionsVaccinating children with IIV3 after prior receipt of LAIV4 generated a modest increase in ADCC antibodies, including some cross-reactivity with an emerging drift variant. Other vaccine-induced ADCC responses were minimal and not affected by vaccine type or sequence.     

Effect of the 2020/21 season influenza vaccine on SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of Italian healthcare workers

ObjectivesHealthcare workers (HCWs) are a priority group for seasonal influenza vaccination (SIV). The 2020/21 SIV campaign was conducted during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccines, including SIV, may exert non-specific protective effects on other infectious diseases which may be ascribable to the concept of trained immunity. The aim of this study was to explore the association between 2020/21 SIV and SARS-CoV-2 positivity in a cohort of Italian HCWs.MethodsIn this observational study, a cohort of HCWs employed by a large (ca 5000 employees) referral tertiary acute-care university hospital was followed up retrospectively until the start of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. The independent variable of interest was the 2020/21 SIV uptake. Both egg-based and cell culture-derived quadrivalent SIVs were available. The study outcome was the incidence of new SARS-CoV-2 infections, as determined by RT-PCR. Multivariable Cox regression was applied in order to discern the association of interest.ResultsThe final cohort consisted of 2561 HCWs who underwent ≥1 RT-PCR test and accounted for a total of 94,445 person-days of observation. SIV uptake was 35.6%. During the study period, a total of 290 new SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred. The incidence of new SARS-CoV-2 was 1.62 (95% CI: 1.22–2.10) and 3.91 (95% CI: 3.43–4.45) per 1000 person-days in vaccinated and non-vaccinated HCWs, respectively, with an adjusted non-proportional hazard ratio of 0.37 (95% CI: 0.22–0.62). E-values suggested that unmeasured confounding was unlikely to explain the association.ConclusionsA lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed among SIV recipients.     

Randomized evaluation of live attenuated vs. inactivated influenza vaccines in schools (RELATIVES) pilot study: A cluster randomized trial

BackgroundSchool-based influenza immunization can effectively address accessibility barriers, but injected inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) may not be acceptable to some children and parents in school settings.ObjectivesTo better understand the feasibility of offering intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV) through schools, we assessed uptake, stakeholder acceptability, and cost of school-based delivery of LAIV compared to IIV.MethodsWe piloted an open-label cluster randomized trial involving 10 elementary schools in Peterborough, Ontario during the 2013–2014 influenza vaccination campaign. Schools were randomized to having students receive IIV or LAIV at publicly-funded school-based clinics organized by the local public health department. We measured the percentage of students vaccinated with at least one dose of influenza vaccine at school. Stakeholder acceptability was evaluated through a questionnaire of parents and interviews of public health department personnel and school principals. We compared the costs per dose of vaccine administered, including staff time and costs of vaccines and supplies.ResultsSingle-dose influenza vaccine uptake was higher for the five schools offering LAIV than for the five offering IIV (19.3% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.02). Interviews with nine school principals and five public health department personnel suggested that the clinics ran smoothly with little disruption to school routines, and that LAIV was associated with increased efficiency and calmer children. All interviewees cited unfamiliarity with LAIV and the study recruitment package length as potential reasons for low uptake. The cost per vaccine dose administered was $38.67 for IIV and $43.50 for LAIV.ConclusionsUse of LAIV in school-based clinics was associated with increased vaccine uptake and the perception among immunizing staff of reduced child anxiety, but also slightly higher vaccine administration costs, compared to IIV. However, uptake was low for both groups. More effective strategies to promote influenza vaccines and to obtain parent consent may improve vaccine uptake.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01995851.FundingPublic Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes of Health Research Influenza Research Network.     

Randomized trial comparing the safety and antibody responses to live attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccine when administered to breastfeeding women

BackgroundLive attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) and inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) are both licensed for administration to nursing mothers. Little is known about the potential for transmission of LAIV viruses from the mother to the infant and the comparative breast milk antibody responses to LAIV and IIV.MethodsWe performed a randomized, double-blind study comparing the immunogenicity of LAIV to IIV when administered to nursing mothers. The safety of LAIV to IIV in women and their infants was also compared. Women received LAIV + intramuscular placebo, or IIV + intranasal placebo on Day 0. Breast milk and nasal swabs (from women and infants) were collected on Days 0, 2, and 8 for detection of LAIV. Breast milk and serum antibody responses were measured at Days 0 and 28. The primary hypothesis was that LAIV would provide superior induction of breast milk IgA responses to influenza as compared to IIV when administered to nursing mothers.ResultsBreast milk IgG, breast milk IgA (H1N1 only), serum hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), and serum IgG responses were significantly higher following administration of IIV compared to LAIV. Receipt of either LAIV or IIV was safe in women and their infants. One (1%) LAIV recipient transmitted vaccine virus to her infant who remained well. No influenza virus was detected in breast milk.ConclusionsBreast milk and serum antibody responses were higher for IIV compared to LAIV. LAIV and IIV were safe for nursing women but there was one (1%) possible transmission of LAIV to an infant. This study suggests that IIV may be the preferred vaccine for nursing mothers.     

The risk of febrile seizures following influenza and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines

BackgroundEvidence on the risk of febrile seizures after inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) is mixed. In the FDA-sponsored Sentinel Initiative, we examined risk of febrile seizures after IIV and PCV13 in children 6–23 months of age during the 2013–14 and 2014–15 influenza seasons.MethodsUsing claims data and a self-controlled risk interval design, we compared the febrile seizure rate in a risk interval (0–1 days) versus control interval (14–20 days). In exploratory analyses, we assessed whether the effect of IIV was modified by concomitant PCV13 administration.ResultsAdjusted for age, calendar time and concomitant administration of the other vaccine, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for risk of febrile seizures following IIV was 1.12 (95% CI 0.80, 1.56) and following PCV13 was 1.80 (95% CI 1.29, 2.52). The attributable risk for febrile seizures following PCV13 ranged from 0.33 to 5.16 per 100,000 doses by week of age.The age and calendar-time adjusted IRR comparing exposed to unexposed time was numerically larger for concomitant IIV and PCV13 (IRR 2.80, 95% CI 1.63, 4.83), as compared to PCV13 without concomitant IIV (IRR 1.54, 95% CI 1.04, 2.28), and the IRR for IIV without concomitant PCV13 suggested no independent effects of IIV (IRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.63, 1.42). Taken together, this suggests a possible interaction between IIV and PCV13, though our study was not sufficiently powered to provide a precise estimate of the interaction.ConclusionsWe found an elevated risk of febrile seizures after PCV13 vaccine but not after IIV. The risk of febrile seizures after PCV13 is low compared to the overall risk in this population of children, and the risk should be interpreted in the context of the importance of preventing pneumococcal infections.     

Safety of guidelines recommending live attenuated influenza vaccine for routine use in children and adolescents with asthma

ObjectiveEvaluate whether a guideline recommending Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (LAIV) for children 2 years and older with asthma increased risks for lower respiratory events (LREs), within 21 or 42 days of vaccination, as compared to standard guidelines to administer Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV) in children with asthma.MethodsThis was a pre/post guideline retrospective cohort study of children ages 2–17 years with asthma and receiving one or more influenza vaccines in two large medical groups from 2007 to 2016. Both groups recommended IIV in the pre-period; in 2010, one group implemented a guideline recommending LAIV for all children, including those with asthma. Main outcomes were medically attended LREs within 21 and 42 days after influenza immunization. Analysis used a generalized estimating equation regression to estimate the ratio of rate ratios (RORs) comparing pre/post events between LAIV guideline and control group.ResultsThe cohort included 7851 influenza vaccinations in 4771 children with asthma. Among patients in the LAIV guideline group, the proportion receiving LAIV increased from 23% to 68% post-guideline implementation, versus an increase from 7 to 11% in the control group. Age and baseline asthma severity adjusted ROR showed no increase in LREs, primarily asthma exacerbations, following implementation of the LAIV guideline: overall aROR (95% Confidence Interval): 0.74 (0.43–1.29) for LRE within 21 days of vaccination, 0.77 (0.53–1.14) for LRE within 42 days of vaccination. For the subset of children ages 2–4 years aROR: 0.92 (0.34–2.53) for LRE within 21 days of vaccination and 0.94 (0.49–1.82) for LRE within 42 days of vaccination; for children 5–18 years aROR (95% CI): 0.58 (0.26–1.30) for LRE within 21 days of vaccination and 0.67 (0.37–1.23) for LRE within 42 days.ConclusionIn a large cohort of children with asthma, a guideline recommending LAIV rather than IIV did not increase LREs following vaccination.     

Improving influenza vaccination in chronically ill children using a tertiary-care based vaccination clinic: Is there a role for the live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV)?

BackgroundChildren with underlying medical conditions should receive influenza vaccine (IV) yearly; yet this remains sub-optimal. We aimed to describe our experience with a tertiary-care hospital-based influenza vaccination clinic for this at-risk population.MethodsFrom October to December 2012, 2013, and 2014, we ran an influenza vaccination clinic at the Montreal Children's Hospital, where children with high-risk conditions come for their follow-up. Both injectable IV (IIV) and live-attenuated IV (LAIV) were offered free of charge to patients and their household contacts. Upon vaccination, parents were asked to fill a pre-piloted questionnaire.ResultsWe vaccinated a total of 2640 high-risk children and 1912 household members during the three influenza vaccination seasons. In 2012 and 2013, 631 and 630 patients with chronic illnesses were vaccinated, compared to 1379 in 2014. Caregivers preferred LAIV primarily because no needle was involved (49.0%) and because it was perceived as less painful (46.9%). LAIV was administered to 69% (2012), 55% (2013) and 47% (2014) of high-risk children. The main reason for not receiving LAIV was because it was contra-indicated. A small fraction of children previously vaccinated with LAIV who did not present any contraindication to LAIV opted for IIV: 12/101 (11.8%) in 2013 and 16/272 (5.9%) in 2014. In 2014, this was mainly due to a previous negative experience with LAIV (11/16).ConclusionHaving an influenza vaccination clinic on site at a tertiary care hospital, where children come for their scheduled visits, facilitates yearly influenza vaccination in children with chronic illnesses. LAIV is preferred by caregivers and patients, when not contraindicated.     

Influenza vaccination rates in children decline when the live attenuated influenza vaccine is not recommended

BackgroundIn 2016 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended against using the live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) for the 2016–2017 influenza season. This recommendation is potentially important for vaccination rates because perceived effectiveness and ease of administration are among the primary determinants of families decisions to vaccinate their children. This investigation sought to determine whether rates of pediatric influenza vaccination changed in a season when the LAIV was not recommended.MethodsThis study used cohort and cross sectional data from an academic primary care pediatric center in central Pennsylvania that serves approximately 12,500 patients. Early season (prior to November 1) and end-of-season (prior to March 1) vaccination rates in the 2015–16 and 2016–17 influenza seasons were recorded for individuals 2–17 years old. Repeat vaccination rates (percentage of children receiving influenza vaccination in one season who were also vaccinated in the next season) were recorded for the 2015–16 into 2016–17 seasons. A logistic regression model adjusting for race, ethnicity, age, insurance type and type of vaccination received was employed to identify predictors of repeat vaccination.ResultsIn the absence of LAIV (2016–17) early vaccination rates were significantly higher (24.7% vs 22.8%, p = 0.004), but end-of-season rates were lower (50.4% vs 52.0%, p = 0.03) than when LAIV was offered (2015–16). After adjusting for covariates, those who had received IIV in the 2015–16 season had higher odds (OR 1.32, 95% CI, 1.15–1.52) of getting a repeat vaccination in the 2016–17 season, compared with those who had received LAIV in the 2015–16 season.ConclusionsEnd-of-season vaccination rates were lower in 2016–17 when LAIV was not recommended, particularly among children who received LAIV in the preceding year. Unavailability of LAIV in the 2016–17 season may have impacted influenza vaccination convenience and perceived effectiveness, two factors which could influence vaccine uptake in pediatric populations.     

Priming with MF59 adjuvanted versus nonadjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccines in children – A systematic review and a meta-analysis

BackgroundIdentifying optimal priming strategies for children <2 years could substantially improve the public health benefits of influenza vaccines. Adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccines were designed to promote a better immune response among young vaccine-naïve children.MethodsWe systematically reviewed randomized trials to assess hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody response to MF59-adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine (aIIV) versus nonadjuvanted IIV among children. We estimated pooled ratios of post-vaccination HAI geometric mean titer (GMT) for aIIV versus IIV and confidence intervals (CIs) using the pooled variances derived from reported CIs.ResultsMean age was 28 months (range, 6–72 months). Children received vaccines with either 7.5 μg (6–35 months) or 15 μg (≥36 months) hemagglutinin of each strain depending on age. Seven of eight trials administered trivalent vaccines and one used quadrivalent vaccine. Pooled post-vaccination GMT ratios against the three influenza vaccine strains were 2.5–3.5 fold higher after 2-dose-aIIV versus 2-dose-IIV among children 6–72 months, and point estimates were higher among children 6–35 months compared with older children. When comparing 1-dose-aIIV to 2-dose-IIV doses, pooled GMT ratios were not significantly different against A/H1N1 (1.0; 95% CI: 0.5–1.8; p = 0.90) and A/H3N2 viruses (1.0; 95% CI: 0.7–1.5; p = 0.81) and were significantly lower against B viruses (0.6; 95% CI: 0.4–0.8; p < 0.001) for both age groups. Notably, GMT ratios for vaccine-mismatched heterologous viruses after 2-dose-aIIV compared with 2-dose-IIV were higher against A/H1N1 (2.0; 95% CI: 1.1–3.4), A/H3N2 (2.9; 95% CI: 1.9–4.2), and B-lineage viruses (2.1; 95% CI: 1.8–2.6).ConclusionsTwo doses of adjuvanted IIV consistently induced better humoral immune responses against Type A and B influenza viruses compared with nonadjuvanted IIVs in young children, particularly among those 6–35 months. One adjuvanted IIV dose had a similar response to two nonadjuvanted IIV doses against Type A influenza viruses. Longer-term benefits from imprinting and cell-mediated immunity, including trials of clinical efficacy, are gaps that warrant investigation.     

Safety of quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine in subjects aged 2–49 years

BackgroundQuadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (Q/LAIV) was licensed in 2012 and replaced trivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine in the United States during the 2013–2014 influenza season. This study assessed the safety of Q/LAIV in children and adults aged 2–49 years.MethodsThis was a prospective observational cohort study using data collected from Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Post-vaccination events of interest were any hospitalization, hospitalization for lower respiratory tract infection, and the following medically attended events: hypersensitivity, seizures/convulsions, lower respiratory tract infection, wheezing, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Bell’s palsy, encephalitis, neuritis, vasculitis, and narcolepsy/cataplexy. The rates of these events during the risk interval post-vaccination were compared with rates observed during reference periods later in the follow-up (within-cohort analysis) and with rates observed in frequency-matched unvaccinated controls and inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) recipients.ResultsA total of 62,040 eligible Q/LAIV recipients were identified during the 2013–2014 influenza season. Within-cohort comparisons of all Q/LAIV recipients as well as comparisons between Q/LAIV recipients and unvaccinated controls or IIV recipients did not show any significantly higher risk of hospitalizations or medically attended events following administration of Q/LAIV. Additional analyses by setting (clinic visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions) and age group (2–4, 5–8, 9–17, and 18–49 years) also did not reveal clinically consistent findings that suggested any increased risk after administration of Q/LAIV.ConclusionIn this large population study of individuals aged 2–49 years, no safety signals associated with the administration of Q/LAIV were observed. A much larger study population would be needed to confidently reject any association between Q/LAIV and very rare events, specifically those with an incidence of <1 event/10,000 person-years.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01985997     

Assessment of temporally-related acute respiratory illness following influenza vaccination

BackgroundA barrier to influenza vaccination is the misperception that the inactivated vaccine can cause influenza. Previous studies have investigated the risk of acute respiratory illness (ARI) after influenza vaccination with conflicting results. We assessed whether there is an increased rate of laboratory-confirmed ARI in post-influenza vaccination periods.MethodsWe conducted a cohort sub-analysis of children and adults in the MoSAIC community surveillance study from 2013 to 2016. Influenza vaccination was confirmed through city or hospital registries. Cases of ARI were ascertained by twice-weekly text messages to household to identify members with ARI symptoms. Nasal swabs were obtained from ill participants and analyzed for respiratory pathogens using multiplex PCR. The primary outcome measure was the hazard ratio of laboratory-confirmed ARI in individuals post-vaccination compared to other time periods during three influenza seasons.ResultsOf the 999 participants, 68.8% were children, 30.2% were adults. Each study season, approximately half received influenza vaccine and one third experienced ≥1 ARI. The hazard of influenza in individuals during the 14-day post-vaccination period was similar to unvaccinated individuals during the same period (HR 0.96, 95% CI [0.60, 1.52]). The hazard of non-influenza respiratory pathogens was higher during the same period (HR 1.65, 95% CI [1.14, 2.38]); when stratified by age the hazard remained higher for children (HR 1·71, 95% CI [1.16, 2.53]) but not for adults (HR 0.88, 95% CI [0.21, 3.69]).ConclusionAmong children there was an increase in the hazard of ARI caused by non-influenza respiratory pathogens post-influenza vaccination compared to unvaccinated children during the same period. Potential mechanisms for this association warrant further investigation. Future research could investigate whether medical decision-making surrounding influenza vaccination may be improved by acknowledging patient experiences, counseling regarding different types of ARI, and correcting the misperception that all ARI occurring after vaccination are caused by influenza.     

Efficacy of live attenuated influenza vaccine against influenza illness in children as a function of illness severity

A recent study of inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in children aged 3–8 years demonstrated higher efficacy against moderate/severe influenza. A meta-analysis of all previous published randomized clinical trials of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) that collected information on illness severity in children aged 24–71 months was conducted. Moderate/severe influenza was defined as fever >39 °C, acute otitis media, or lower respiratory tract illness; other cases were classified as milder influenza. LAIV efficacy versus placebo was 95.4% [95% confidence interval: 88.5, 98.1] (year 1) and 88.5% [77.4, 94.9] (year 2) against moderate/severe influenza and 91.4% [77.9, 96.7] (year 1) and 84.2% [56.7, 94.3] (year 2) against milder influenza. The relative efficacy of LAIV versus IIV was 52.2% [31.6, 66.6] for moderate/severe influenza and 45.0% [28.6, 57.5] for milder influenza. Efficacy against all influenza illnesses, regardless of severity, is critical to prevent influenza illness and transmission in the community.