A randomized trial of the effect of vaccine injection speed on acute pain in infants

ObjectiveThis study compared the pain caused from fast vs. slow vaccine injections.MethodsInfants aged 2–6 months receiving primary immunizations were randomized to fast (2–4 mL/s) or slow (5–10 mL/s) injections during routine 0.5 mL Diphtheria, Tetanus, acellular Pertussis, Inactivated Polio Virus, Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (DTaP-IPV-Hib) injections. Those aged 2 and 4 months additionally received 0.5 mL Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV) injections. A research assistant and parent unaware of treatment allocation and hypothesis assessed pain using validated and recommended tools, including; the Modified Behavioural Pain Scale (MBPS, range 0–10), cry duration, and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, range 0–10). The primary outcome was infant pain score using the MBPS.ResultsAltogether, 120 were recruited; 61 were randomized to fast injections and 59 to slow injections. One hundred and ninteen infants participated. There were no differences in characteristics, including; age (p = 0.994) and sex (p = 0.540). The mean MPBS score (standard deviation) during DTaP-IPV-Hib injection was lower in the fast injection group: 6.4 (2.7) vs. 7.4 (2.5), respectively; p = 0.046. Regression analysis demonstrated a positive correlation between injection speed and pain. There were no other differences between groups.ConclusionFast injection reduced injection-induced pain in infants receiving DTaP-IPV-Hib but not PCV vaccine. Fast injections are recommended when administering vaccines because of the potential for a reduction in pain, feasibility and practicality.Trial registration: NCT02504398     

Concomitant administration of a fully liquid,ready-to-use DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T hexavalent vaccine with a meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine in infants

DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T or hexavalent vaccines are indicated for primary and booster vaccination of infants and toddlers against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis and invasive diseases caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib). The present study evaluates the safety and immunogenicity of a ready-to-use hexavalent vaccine when co-administered with a meningococcal serogroup C conjugate (MenC) vaccine in infants.This was a phase III, open-label, randomised, multicentre study conducted in Finland. Healthy infants, aged 46–74 days (n = 350), were randomised in a ratio of 1:1 to receive DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine at two, three and four months, either with a MenC vaccine co-administered at two and four months (Group 1; n = 175) or without MenC vaccine (Group 2; n = 175). All infants also received routine rotavirus and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines.The proportion of participants with an anti-HBs concentration ⩾10 mIU/mL assessed one month after the third dose of DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine was 97.5% [95%CI: 93.1–99.3] in the coadministration group and 96.1% [95%CI: 91.8–98.6] in the group without MenC vaccine. The proportion of participants with an anti-MenC SBA titre ⩾8 assessed one month after the second dose of MenC vaccine was 100% in the coadministration group. Both primary objectives were achieved.Secondary immunogenicity and safety analyses showed that co-administration of DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T and MenC vaccines did not impact the immune response to the antigens of each of the two vaccines. All vaccines were well tolerated and the safety profile of DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine was similar in both groups.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01839175; EudraCT number: 2012-005547-24.     

Impact of enterovirus and other enteric pathogens on oral polio and rotavirus vaccine performance in Bangladeshi infants

BackgroundOral polio vaccine (OPV) and rotavirus vaccine (RV) exhibit poorer performance in low-income settings compared to high-income settings. Prior studies have suggested an inhibitory effect of concurrent non-polio enterovirus (NPEV) infection, but the impact of other enteric infections has not been comprehensively evaluated.MethodsIn urban Bangladesh, we tested stools for a broad range of enteric viruses, bacteria, parasites, and fungi by quantitative PCR from infants at weeks 6 and 10 of life, coincident with the first OPV and RV administration respectively, and examined the association between enteropathogen quantity and subsequent OPV serum neutralizing titers, serum rotavirus IgA, and rotavirus diarrhea.ResultsCampylobacter and enterovirus (EV) quantity at the time of administration of the first dose of OPV was associated with lower OPV1-2 serum neutralizing titers, while enterovirus quantity was also associated with diminished rotavirus IgA (−0.08 change in log titer per tenfold increase in quantity; P = 0.037), failure to seroconvert (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64–0.96; P = 0.022), and breakthrough rotavirus diarrhea (OR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.05–1.71; P = 0.020) after adjusting for potential confounders. These associations were not observed for Sabin strain poliovirus quantity.ConclusionIn this broad survey of enteropathogens and oral vaccine performance we find a particular association between EV carriage, particularly NPEV, and OPV immunogenicity and RV protection. Strategies to reduce EV infections may improve oral vaccine responses.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01375647.     

Vaccine schedule compliance among very low birth weight infants in Lima,Peru

ObjectiveThere is little information about vaccine schedule compliance in very-low-birth-weight infants in developing countries. The aim of the study was to describe the compliance with the vaccine schedule among this population in Lima, Peru.Patients and methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study in four hospitals in Lima in infants with a birth-weight of less than 1500 g, followed from birth up to 12 months of age every 2 weeks. The date and age at administration of each vaccine was recordedResults222 infants were enrolled. The median birth-weight was 1250 g (range 550–1499 g) and the median gestational age was 30.0 weeks (range 23–37 weeks). The mean age for the first pentavalent (DPT, Hib, HepB) and oral polio vaccine administration was 4.3 ± 1.4 months in infants with a birth-weight of <1000 g vs. 3.1 ± 1.0 in infants with a birth-weight 1000–1500 g (p < 0.001); 4.1 ± 0.9 vs. 3.3 ± 1.1 for rotavirus (p < 0.05); and 5.1 ± 2.1 vs. 4.3 ± 1.8 for the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine. Only 35% had received the three doses of oral polio and pentavalent vaccine by seven months, although by nine months 81% had received these vaccines.ConclusionsVaccination of very-low-birth-weight infants in Peru is significantly delayed, especially in infants with a birth-weight of <1000 g and lower gestational age. Urgent educational interventions targeting physicians and nurses should be implemented in order to improve vaccination rates and timing in these high risk populations.     

Acceptance of multiple injectable vaccines in a single immunization visit in The Gambia pre and post introduction of inactivated polio vaccine

BackgroundAs the World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends that children be protected against 11 different pathogens, it is becoming increasingly necessary to administer multiple injectable vaccines during a single immunization visit. In this study we assess Gambian healthcare providers’ and infant caregivers’ attitudes and practices related to the administration of multiple injectable vaccines to a child at a single immunization visit before and after the 2015 introduction of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV). IPV introduction increased the number of injectable vaccines recommended for the 4-month immunization visit from two to three in The Gambia.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey before and after the introduction of IPV at 4 months of age in a representative sample of all health facilities providing immunizations in The Gambia. Healthcare providers who administer vaccines at the selected health facilities and caregivers who brought infants for their 4 month immunization visit were surveyed.FindingsPrior to IPV introduction, 9.9% of healthcare providers and 35.7% of infant caregivers expressed concern about a child receiving more than 2 injections in a single visit. Nevertheless, 98.8% and 90.9% of infants received all required vaccinations for the visit before and after IPV introduction, respectively. The only reason why vaccines were not received was vaccine stock-outs. Infant caregivers generally agreed that vaccinators could be trusted to provide accurate information regarding the number of vaccines that a child needed.ConclusionHealthcare providers and infant caregivers in this resource limited setting accepted an increase in the number of injectable vaccines administered at a single visit even though some expressed concerns about the increase.     

The effect of probiotics and zinc supplementation on the immune response to oral rotavirus vaccine: A randomized,factorial design,placebo-controlled study among Indian infants

BackgroundStrategies are needed to improve oral rotavirus vaccine (RV), which provides suboptimal protection in developing countries. Probiotics and zinc supplementation could improve RV immunogenicity by altering the intestinal microbiota and immune function.MethodsInfants 5 weeks old living in urban Vellore, India were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a 4-arm factorial design to assess the effects of daily zinc (5 mg), probiotic (10¹⁰ Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) or placebo on the immunogenicity of two doses of RV (Rotarix®, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) given at 6 and 10 weeks of age. Infants were eligible for participation if healthy, available for the study duration and without prior receipt of RV or oral poliovirus vaccine other than the birth dose. The primary outcome was seroconversion to rotavirus at 14 weeks of age based on detection of VP6-specific IgA at ≥20 U/ml in previously seronegative infants or a fourfold rise in concentration.ResultsThe study took place during July 2012 to February 2013. 620 infants were randomized equally between study arms and 551 (88.9%) completed per protocol. Seroconversion was recorded in 54/137 (39.4%), 42/136 (30.9%), 40/143 (28.0%), and 37/135 (27.4%) infants receiving (1) probiotic and zinc, (2) probiotic and placebo, (3) placebo and zinc, (4) two placebos. Seroconversion showed a modest improvement among infants receiving probiotic (difference between groups 1, 2 and 3, 4 was 7.5% (97.5% Confidence Interval (CI): −1.4%, 16.2%), p = 0.066) but not zinc (difference between groups 1, 3 and 2, 4 was 4.4% (97.5% CI: −4.4%, 13.2%), p = 0.272). 16 serious adverse events were recorded, none related to study interventions.ConclusionsZinc or probiotic supplementation did not significantly improve the low immunogenicity of rotavirus vaccine given to infants in a poor urban community in India. A modest effect of combined supplementation deserves further investigation.Trial registrationThe trial was registered in India (CTRI/2012/05/002677).     

Live attenuated tetravalent (G1-G4) bovine-human reassortant rotavirus vaccine (BRV-TV): Randomized,controlled phase III study in Indian infants

BackgroundRotavirus remains the leading cause of diarrhoea among children <5 years. We assessed immunogenic non-inferiority of a tetravalent bovine-human reassortant rotavirus vaccine (BRV-TV) over the licensed human-bovine pentavalent rotavirus vaccine RV5.MethodsPhase III single-blind study (parents blinded) in healthy infants randomized (1:1) to receive three doses of BRV-TV or RV5 at 6–8, 10–12, and 14–16 weeks of age. All concomitantly received a licensed diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (DTwP-HepB-Hib) and oral polio vaccine (OPV). Immunogenic non-inferiority was evaluated in terms of the inter-group difference in anti-rotavirus serum IgA seroresponse (primary endpoint), and seroprotection/seroresponse rates to DTwP-HepB-Hib and OPV vaccines. Seroresponse was defined as a ≥4-fold increase in titers from baseline to D28 post-dose 3. Non-inferiority was declared if the difference between groups (based on the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval [CI]) was above −10%. Each subject was evaluated for solicited adverse events 7 days and unsolicited & serious adverse events 28 days following each dose of vaccination.ResultsOf 1195 infants screened, 1182 were randomized (590 to BRV-TV; 592 to RV5). Non-inferiority for rotavirus serum IgA seroresponse was not established: BRV-TV, 47.1% (95%CI: 42.8; 51.5) versus RV5, 61.2% (95%CI: 56.8; 65.5); difference between groups, −14.08% (95%CI: −20.4; −7.98). Serum IgA geometric mean concentrations at D28 post-dose 3 were 28.4 and 50.1 U/ml in BRV-TV and RV5 groups, respectively. For all DTwP-HepB-Hib and OPV antigens, seroprotection/seroresponse was elicited in both groups and the −10% non-inferiority criterion between groups was met. There were 16 serious adverse events, 10 in BRV-TV group and 6 in RV5 group; none were classified as vaccine related. Both groups had similar vaccine safety profiles.ConclusionBRV-TV was immunogenic but did not meet immunogenic non-inferiority criteria to RV5 when administered concomitantly with routine pediatric antigens in infants.     

Uptake of rotavirus vaccine among US infants at Immunization Information System Sentinel Sites

ObjectiveCoverage with rotavirus vaccine among US children has been lower compared to that with other routine childhood vaccines. Our objectives were to examine rotavirus vaccine (RV) uptake over time compared to other routine vaccinations, ages at administration, and quantitate potential missed opportunities for RV receipt.MethodsWe analyzed data from 6 Immunization Information System (IIS) Sentinel Sites, which represent approximately 10% of the United States (US) pediatric population. Among infants aged 5 months, we compared uptake of ⩾1 dose of RV, to that of Diphtheria, Tetanus, and acellular Pertussis (DTaP) and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), for each quarter during 2006–2013. We used data from infants in the 2012 birth cohort to examine RV receipt in more detail.ResultsAmong infants aged 5 months, the average site coverage with ⩾1 dose of RV reached 78% in 2010 and subsequently stayed steady at 79–81% through 2013. The average difference between ⩾1 dose DTaP coverage and RV coverage remained between about 6 and 8 percentage points during mid-2012 through 2013. Infants born in 2012 received RV doses closely in line with the timing recommended by the ACIP. Approximately one-third of the difference in coverage between ⩾1 dose of DTaP and ⩾1 dose of RV among infants could be due to the maximum age restriction of the first RV dose. The other two-thirds of the difference appears to have been a result of potential missed opportunities for starting the RV series--these infants received another routine immunization when age eligible to receive RV dose 1, but did not receive RV.ConclusionUptake with RV during infancy remains below that of other routine vaccines. Understanding the barriers to administration of RV among age-eligible infants could help improve vaccine coverage.     

CHRONOVAC VOYAGEUR: A study of the immune response to yellow fever vaccine among infants previously immunized against measles

For administration of multiple live attenuated vaccines, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends either simultaneous immunization or period of at least 28 days between vaccines, due to a possible reduction in the immune response to either vaccine.The main objective of this study was to compare the immune response to measles (alone or combined with mumps and rubella) and yellow fever vaccines among infants aged 6–24 months living in a yellow fever non-endemic country who had received measles and yellow fever vaccines before travelling to a yellow fever endemic area.Subjects and methods: A retrospective, multicenter case-control study was carried out in 7 travel clinics in the Paris area from February 1st 2011 to march 31, 2015. Cases were defined as infants immunized with the yellow fever vaccine and with the measles vaccine, either alone or in combination with mumps and rubella vaccine, with a period of 1–27 days between each immunization. For each case, two controls were matched based on sex and age: a first control group (control 1) was defined as infants having received the measles vaccine and the yellow fever vaccine simultaneously; a second control group (control 2) was defined as infants who had a period of more than 27 days between receiving the measles vaccine and yellow fever vaccine.The primary endpoint of the study was the percentage of infants with protective immunity against yellow fever, measured by the titer of neutralizing antibodies in a venous blood sample.Results: One hundred and thirty-one infants were included in the study (62 cases, 50 infants in control 1 and 19 infants in control 2). Of these, 127 (96%) were shown to have a protective titer of yellow fever antibodies. All 4 infants without a protective titer of yellow fever antibodies were part of control group 1.Discussion: The measles vaccine, alone or combined with mumps and rubella vaccines, appears to have no influence on humoral immune response to the yellow fever vaccine when administered between 1 and 27 days. The absence of protective antibodies against yellow fever was observed only among infants who received both vaccines simultaneously.Conclusion: These results may support a revision of current vaccination recommendations concerning the administration of these two live attenuated vaccines either on the same day or at least 28 days apart. Our findings show no statistically significant difference if the interval between both vaccines is more than 24 h, but the immune response seems to be reduced when the two vaccines are given at the same time.     

Impact of rotavirus vaccine on all-cause diarrhea and rotavirus hospitalizations in Madagascar

BackgroundRotavirus vaccine was introduced into the Extended Program on Immunization in Madagascar in May 2014. We analyzed trends in prevalence of all cause diarrhea and rotavirus hospitalization in children <5 years of age before and after vaccine introduction and assessed trend of circulating rotavirus genotypes at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Mère Enfant Tsaralalàna (CHU MET).MethodsFrom January 2010 to December 2016, we reviewed the admission logbook to observe the rate of hospitalization caused by gastroenteritis among 19619 children <5 years of age admitted at the hospital. In June 2013–December 2016, active rotavirus surveillance was also conducted at CHUMET with support from WHO. Rotavirus antigen was detected by EIA from stool specimen of children who are eligible for rotavirus gastroenteritis surveillance at sentinel site laboratory and rotavirus positive specimens were further genotyped at Regional Reference Laboratory by RT-PCR.ResultsDiarrhea hospitalizations decreased after rotavirus vaccine introduction. The median proportion of annual hospitalizations due to diarrhea was 26% (range: 31–22%) before vaccine introduction; the proportion was 25% the year of vaccine introduction, 17% in 2015 and 16% in 2016. Rotavirus positivity paralleled patterns observed in diarrhea. Before vaccine introduction, 56% of stool specimens tested positive for rotavirus; the percent positive was 13% in 2015, 12% in 2016. Diverse genotypes were detected in the pre-vaccine period; the most common were G3P[8] (n = 53; 66%), G2P[4] (n = 12; 15%), and G1P[8] (n = 11; 14%). 6 distinct genotypes were found in 2015; the most common genotype was G2P[4] (n = 10; 67%), the remaining, 5, G12[P8], G3[P8], G1G3[P4], G3G12[P4][P8] and G1G3[NT] had one positive specimen each.ConclusionsFollowing rotavirus vaccine introduction all-cause diarrhea and rotavirus-specific hospitalizations declined dramatically. The most common genotypes detected in the pre-vaccine period were G3P[8] and G2P[4] in 2015, the post vaccine period.     

Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in Hong Kong children

BackgroundRotavirus is a common infectious cause of childhood hospitalisation in Hong Kong. Rotavirus vaccines have been used in the private sector since licensure in 2006 but have not been incorporated in the government’s universal Childhood Immunisation Programme. This study aimed to evaluate rotavirus vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation.MethodsThis case-control study was conducted in the 2014/2015 rotavirus season in six public hospitals. Hospitalised acute gastroenteritis patients meeting inclusion criteria were recruited and copies of their immunisation records were collected. Case-patients were defined as enrolled subjects with stool specimens obtained in the first 48 h of hospitalisation that tested positive for rotavirus, whereas control-patients were those with stool specimens obtained in the first 48 h of hospitalisation testing negative for rotavirus. Vaccine effectiveness for administration of at least one dose of either Rotarix^® (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) or RotaTeq^® (Merck Research Laboratories) was calculated as 1 minus the odds ratio for rotavirus vaccination history for case-patients versus control-patients.ResultsAmong the 525 eligible subjects recruited, immunisation records were seen in 404 (77%) subjects. 31% (162/525 and 126/404) tested positive for rotavirus. In the 404 subjects assessed for vaccine effectiveness, 2.4% and 24% received at least 1 dose of either rotavirus vaccine in case- and control-patients respectively. The unmatched vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation for administration of at least one dose of either rotavirus vaccines was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75%, 98%). The matched analyses by age only and both age and admission date showed 96% (95% CI: 72%, 100%) and 89% (95% CI: 51%, 97%) protection against rotavirus hospitalisation respectively.ConclusionsRotavirus vaccine is highly effective in preventing hospitalisation from rotavirus disease in young Hong Kong children.     

Knowledge,attitudes, beliefs,and behaviors of parents and healthcare providers before and after implementation of a universal rotavirus vaccination program

ObjectiveIn Canada, rotavirus vaccine is recommended for all infants, but not all provinces/territories have publicly funded programs. We compared public and healthcare provider (HCP) knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors in a province with a public health nurse-delivered, publicly funded rotavirus vaccination program to a province with a publicly funded, physician-delivered program. A third province with no vaccination program acted as a control.DesignInformation about knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of parents whose children were eligible for the universal program and healthcare providers responsible for administering the vaccine were collected through the use of two validated surveys distributed in public health clinics, physicians’ offices, and via e-mail. Early and postvaccine-program survey results were compared.ResultsA total of 722 early implementation and 709 postimplementation parent surveys and 180 early and 141 postimplementation HCP surveys were analyzed. HCP and public attitudes toward rotavirus vaccination were generally positive and didn’t change over time. More parents postprogram were aware of the NACI recommendation and the vaccination program and reported that their healthcare provider discussed rotavirus infection and vaccine with them. Prior to the program across all sites, more physicians than nurses were aware of the national recommendation regarding rotavirus vaccine. In the postprogram survey, however, more nurses were aware of the national recommendation and their provincial universal rotavirus vaccination program. Nurses had higher knowledge scores than physicians in the postprogram survey (p < 0.001). Parents of young infants were also more knowledgeable about rotavirus and rotavirus vaccine in the two areas where universal programs were in place (p < 0.001).ConclusionsImplementation of a universal rotavirus vaccination program was associated with an increase in knowledge and more positive attitudes toward rotavirus vaccine amongst parents of eligible infants. Nurses involved in a public health-delivered vaccination program were more knowledgeable and had more positive attitudes toward the vaccine than physicians in a jurisdiction where vaccine was physician-delivered.     

Use of a booster dose of capsular group C meningococcal glycoconjugate vaccine to demonstrate immunologic memory in children primed with one or two vaccine doses in infancy

BackgroundUse of a polysaccharide vaccine challenge to demonstrate immunologic memory after priming with capsular group C meningococcal conjugate vaccines (MenCC) risks induction of immunologic hyporesponsiveness. For this reason, MenCC vaccines are now used as probes of immunologic memory, however, no studies have demonstrated their ability to distinguish primed from unprimed children.MethodsThis study was part of a randomised controlled trial investigating the immunogenicity of a booster dose of the combined Haemophilus influenzae type b and MenC-tetanus toxoid vaccine (Hib-MenC-TT) in infants receiving reduced dose MenCC vaccine priming schedules (one MenC-CRM/MenC-TT or two MenC-CRM vaccine doses) compared with an unprimed group. Antibody kinetics were studied in a subset of 269 children by measuring changes in the MenC serum bactericidal antibody, using rabbit complement, (MenC rSBA) titres and MenC specific IgG memory B-cells before and at 6 and 28 days following the 12 month booster vaccination.ResultsAt 6 days after the 12 month MenCC vaccine, the rise in MenC rSBA titres and MenC specific IgG memory B-cells of the primed groups were significantly higher than the infant MenCC naïve group. Participants primed with one MenC-TT dose had the highest increase in MenC rSBA titres compared with all other groups. The MenC rSBA titres at the 28th compared with the 6th day after boosting was significantly higher in those primed with a single MenC-TT/MenC-CRM vaccine in infancy compared with those who were not primed or who were primed with two doses of the MenC-CRM vaccine.ConclusionImmunologic memory can be demonstrated by a MenCC booster vaccination but is affected by the type and number of MenCC doses used for infant priming. The MenC rSBA responses can be used to demonstrate successful immunologic priming.     

Efficacy and safety of a pentavalent live human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine (RV5) in healthy Chinese infants: A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial was conducted in healthy Chinese infants to assess the efficacy and safety of a pentavalent live human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeq™, RV5) against rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE).Methods4040 participants aged 6–12 weeks were enrolled and randomly assigned to either 3 oral doses of RV5 (n = 2020) or placebo (n = 2020), administered ∼4 weeks apart. The participants also received OPV and DTaP in a concomitant or staggered fashion. The primary objective was to evaluate vaccine efficacy (VE) against naturally-occurring RVGE at least 14 days following the third dose. Key secondary objectives included: VE against naturally-occurring severe RVGE and VE against severe and any-severity RVGE caused by rotavirus serotypes contained in the vaccine, occurring at least 14 days after the third dose. All adverse events (AEs) were collected for 30 days following each dose. Serious AEs (SAEs) and intussusception cases were collected during the entire study. (ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT02062385).ResultsVE against RVGE of any-severity caused by any serotype was 69.3% (95% CI: 54.5, 79.7). The secondary efficacy analysis showed an efficacy of: 78.9% (95% CI: 59.1, 90.1) against severe RVGE caused by any serotype; 69.9% (95% CI: 55.2, 80.3) and 78.9% (95% CI: 59.1, 90.1) against any-severity and severe RVGE caused by serotypes contained in the vaccine, respectively. Within 30 days following any vaccination, 53.5% (1079/2015) and 53.3% (1077/2019) of participants reported at least one AE, and 5.8% (116/2015) and 5.7% (116/2019) reported SAEs in the vaccine and placebo groups, respectively. No SAEs were considered vaccine-related in recipients of RV5. Two intussusception cases were reported in recipients of RV5 who recovered after receiving treatment. Neither was considered vaccine-related.ConclusionsIn Chinese infants, RV5 was efficacious against any-severity and severe RVGE caused by any serotype and generally well-tolerated with respect to AEs.     

Plasma cell and serum antibody responses to influenza vaccine in preterm and full-term infants

BackgroundPreterm (PT) infants are at greater risk for severe influenza infection and experience decrements in long-term antibody responses to vaccines. This may related to defects in antibody secreting cell (ASC) generation.ObjectiveTo investigate the relationships among the frequencies of influenza-specific antibody secreting cells, ASC numbers and subsets, and antibody responses to influenza vaccines (IV) among PT and full-term (FT) infants.Design/methodsWe enrolled 11 former PT (≤32 weeks′ gestation, ≤1500 g′ birth weight) and 11 FT infants, 6–17 months of age, receiving their first influenza immunizations. Infants received two doses of inactivated trivalent (T)IV or quadrivalent (Q)IV during the 2012–2013 and 2013–2014 influenza seasons, respectively, at 0 and 28 days, and blood was drawn at 0, 10, 35, and 56 days and 9 months. Vaccine-specific antibody was measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) at 0 and 56 days and 9 months, vaccine-specific ASC numbers by enzyme linked immunospot (ELISPOT) at 10 and 35 days, and ASC subsets by flow cytometry at 0, 10 and 35 days.ResultsPT infants had post-vaccine HAI titers to all 4 vaccine strains at least equal to FT infants at 56 days and 9 months after beginning immunization. Influenza-specific ASC ELISPOT responses at 35 days were higher among PT than FT infants (median 100 v. 30 per 10⁶ PBMC, p = 0.04). ASC numbers at 35 days were positively correlated with serum HAI titers at 56 days (ρ = 0.50–0.80). There were no statistical differences between PT and FT infants in the frequency of five ASC subsets and no specific ASC subset correlated with durability of serum antibody titers.ConclusionsInfluenza-specific ASC numbers in both FT and PT infants correlated with peak antibody titers, but ASC subsets did not correlate with durability of antibody response.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a trivalent recombinant PcpA,PhtD, and PlyD1 pneumococcal protein vaccine in adults,toddlers, and infants: A phase I randomized controlled study

BackgroundPneumococcal protein vaccines (PPrVs) may provide improved protection over currently available polysaccharide and conjugated polysaccharide vaccines. Here, we examined the safety and immunogenicity of a trivalent recombinant PPrV containing PcpA, PhtD, and PlyD1.MethodsThis was a phase I, single-center, randomized, observer-blind study with safety review between cohorts. Adults (18–50 years; n = 30) and then toddlers (12–13 months; n = 30) were randomized 2:1 to receive aluminum-adjuvanted trivalent PPrV (PPrV + adj) containing 50 μg per antigen or placebo. Infants (42–49 days; n = 220) were next randomized to be injected at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age with 10 μg PPrV + adj or placebo (n = 60; 2:1); 25 μg PPrV + adj, 25 μg unadjuvanted PPrV, or placebo (n = 100; 2:2:1); and 50 μg PPrV + adj or placebo (n = 60; 2:1). Solicited reactions were recorded for 7 days and unsolicited adverse events for 30 days after each vaccination. Concentrations of antibodies to the three vaccine antigens were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.ResultsTenderness/pain was the most frequent injection-site reaction. Abnormal crying and irritability (infants), loss of appetite (toddlers), and headache, malaise, and myalgia (adults) were the most frequent systemic reactions. Reactions were mostly mild or moderate, resolved within 3 days, were not adjuvant- or dose-dependent, and were not increased by repeated vaccination. No immediate adverse events, hypersensitivity reactions, or treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. In all PPrV + adj cohorts, at least 75% of subjects had a ≥2-fold increase in all three antibody concentrations. In infants, antibody concentrations were higher with PPrV + adj than with unadjuvanted PPrV, higher with three than two vaccinations, and similar at the different vaccine doses.ConclusionsThe candidate trivalent PPrV was safe and immunogenic in adults, toddlers, and infants. Addition of aluminum adjuvant improved immunogenicity in infants without changing the safety profile.     

A native outer membrane vesicle vaccine confers protection against meningococcal colonization in human CEACAM1 transgenic mice

BackgroundThe effect of protein-based meningococcal vaccines on prevention of nasopharyngeal colonization has been difficult to investigate experimentally because a reliable animal colonization model did not exist.MethodsHuman CEACAM1 transgenic mice, which can be colonized by meningococci, were immunized IP with one of two meningococcal native outer membrane vesicle (NOMV) vaccines prepared from mutants with attenuated endotoxin (lpxL1 knockout) and over-expressed sub-family B Factor H-binding proteins (FHbp). Animals were challenged intranasally two weeks after the third dose with wild-type strain H44/76, or were treated IP with anti-NOMV serum before and during the bacterial challenge.ResultsThe NOMV-1 vaccine, prepared from the serogroup B H44/76 mutant, elicited ∼40-fold higher serum bactericidal antibody titers against the wild-type H44/76 challenge strain than the NOMV-2 vaccine prepared from a heterologous serogroup W mutant strain with different PorA and FHbp amino acid sequence variants. Compared to aluminum hydroxide-immunized control mice, the efficacy for prevention of any H44/76 colonization was 93% (95% confidence interval, 52–99, P < 0.0001) for the NOMV-1 vaccine, and 19% (−3–36, P = 0.23) for NOMV-2. NOMV-2-vaccinated mice had a 5.6-fold decrease in geometric mean CFU of bacteria per animal in tracheal washes compared to control mice (P = 0.007). The efficacy of passive administration of serum from NOMV-1-vaccinated mice to immunologically naïve mice against colonization was 44% (17–61; P = 0.002).ConclusionsBoth NOMV vaccines protected against meningococcal colonization but there was greater protection by the NOMV-1 vaccine with antigens matched with the challenge strain. Meningococcal vaccines that target protein antigens have potential to decrease colonization.     

Catching-up with pentavalent vaccine: Exploring reasons behind lower rotavirus vaccine coverage in El Salvador

Rotavirus vaccine was introduced in El Salvador in 2006 and is recommended to be given concomitantly with DTP–HepB–Haemophilus influenzae type b (pentavalent) vaccine at ages 2 months (upper age limit 15 weeks) and 4 months (upper age limit 8 months) of age. However, rotavirus vaccination coverage continues to lag behind that of pentavalent vaccine, even in years when national rotavirus vaccine stock-outs have not occurred. We analyzed factors associated with receipt of oral rotavirus vaccine among children who received at least 2 doses of pentavalent vaccine in a stratified cluster survey of children aged 24–59 months conducted in El Salvador in 2011. Vaccine doses included were documented on vaccination cards (94.4%) or in health facility records (5.6%). Logistic regression and survival analysis were used to assess factors associated with vaccination status and age at vaccination. Receipt of pentavalent vaccine by age 15 weeks was associated with rotavirus vaccination (OR: 5.1; 95% CI 2.7, 9.4), and receipt of the second pentavalent dose by age 32 weeks was associated with receipt of two rotavirus vaccine doses (OR: 5.0; 95% CI 2.1–12.3). Timely coverage with the first pentavalent vaccine dose was 88.2% in the 2007 cohort and 91.1% in the 2008 cohort (p = 0.04). Children born in 2009, when a four-month national rotavirus vaccine stock-out occurred, had an older median age of receipt of rotavirus vaccine and were less likely to receive rotavirus on the same date as the same dose of pentavalent vaccine than children born in 2007 and 2008. Upper age limit recommendations for rotavirus vaccine administration contributed to suboptimal vaccination coverage. Survey data suggest that late rotavirus vaccination and co-administration with later doses of pentavalent vaccine among children born in 2009 helped increase rotavirus vaccine coverage following shortages.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a parenterally administered rotavirus VP8 subunit vaccine in healthy adults

BackgroundThe P2-VP8 subunit vaccine for the prevention of rotavirus gastroenteritis is comprised of a truncated VP8 subunit protein from the rotavirus Wa strain (G1[P8]) fused to the tetanus toxin P2 epitope, and adsorbed on aluminum hydroxide for intramuscular administration.MethodsThree groups of 16 adults were randomized to receive three injections of P2-VP8 (12) or placebo (4) at doses of 10, 30 or 60 μg of vaccine. IgG and IgA antibodies to P2-VP8 were assessed by ELISA in serum and lymphocyte supernatant (ALS). Serum samples were tested for neutralizing antibodies to homologous and heterologous strains of rotavirus.ResultsThe vaccine was well-tolerated. All vaccine recipients demonstrated significant IgA responses and all but one demonstrated IgG responses; in the 60 μg cohort, geometric mean titers (GMTs) rose 70- and 80-fold for IgA and IgG, respectively. Homologous neutralizing antibody responses were observed in about half of participants in all three dose cohorts; in the 60 μg cohort, GMTs against Wa rose from 128 to 992. Neutralizing antibody responses were robust to P[8] strains, moderate to P[4] strains and negligible to P[6] strains. ALS IgA responses were dose dependent.ConclusionsThe P2-VP8 subunit vaccine was well tolerated and evoked promising immune responses.Clinical trials registrationNCT01764256     

Parents’ concerns about vaccine scheduling in Shanghai,China

BackgroundSeveral new vaccines have been introduced into China in recent years, but some parents in China have shown concerns about the scheduling of vaccinations for young infants. This study explores caregiver concerns about children receiving multiple vaccines during a single visit and about vaccine administration in infants <6 months, and assesses the degree to which these concerns are associated with ratings of the importance of different sources of vaccine information in Shanghai.MethodsCaregivers of children 8 months to 7 years presenting at immunization clinics in Shanghai completed a survey about vaccine co-administration and vaccine administration <6 months of age. Respondents provided ratings of information from different sources (Internet, family/friends, other parents) and trust in doctors. We analyzed vaccine concerns using linear regression analyses that included these information sources after adjusting for socioeconomic variables.ResultsAmong 618 caregivers, 64% were concerned about vaccine co-administration and 31% were concerned about vaccine administration to infants <6 months of age. Higher ratings of Internet as an important source of information were associated with greater concern about co-administration (β = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.22) and concern about administration at <6 months of age (β = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.28). Higher ratings given to information from other parents corresponded to 0.24 points greater concern about vaccine co-administration (95% CI: 0.04, 0.44). More trust in doctors and ratings of information from friends and family were not associated with vaccine concerns.ConclusionsCaregiver concerns about vaccine scheduling may limit China’s flexibility to add vaccines to its official immunization schedule. Reporting information about vaccine safety on the Internet and bringing groups of parents together to discuss vaccines might help to ameliorate concerns about vaccine scheduling.