Immunogenicity and safety of an AS03-adjuvanted H7N1 vaccine in adults 65 years of age and older: A phase II,observer-blind,randomized, controlled trial

BackgroundH7 influenza strains can cause severe and often fatal human infections, especially in the elderly. This phase II, observer-blind, randomized trial (www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01949090) assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a novel AS03-adjuvanted H7N1 vaccine that may serve as a model H7-subtype vaccine.Methods360 adults ≥65 years of age in stable health received either 1 of 4 adjuvanted A/mallard/Netherlands/12/2000 split virion vaccine formulations (3.75 μg or 7.5 μg hemagglutinin adjuvanted with either AS03_A or AS03_B) or saline placebo, given as a 2-dose series. Immunogenicity was assessed using hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (MN) assays for the per-protocol cohort, comprising 332 participants at 21 days post-each dose, 332 at month 6, and 309 at month 12 (HI assay only). Safety was assessed up to month 12 for all participants who had received ≥1 dose (360 participants).ResultsFor H7N1 HI antibody assessment at day 42 (21 days post-dose 2), seroprotection rates (SPR) in the vaccinated groups were 69.6%–88.7%, seroconversion rates (SCR) 69.6%–88.5%, mean geometric increase (MGI) 11.0–18.9, and HI geometric mean titers (GMTs) 55.0–104.8. These parameters declined by month 6 and month 12. Microneutralization GMTs were 46.2–74.7 in the vaccinated groups at day 42, while vaccine response rate (VRR; proportion with ≥4-fold increase in MN titer) was 46.4%–81.5%. For the cross-reactive H7N9 strain, at day 42, HI GMT were 64.3–201.3, SPR 78.6%–96.3%, SCR 79.3%–96.3%, and MGI 14.1–37.7; MN GMTs were 44.0–85.6, and VRR 46.4–85.2%.The most frequent solicited symptom was injection site pain (41.7%–65.0% of vaccine recipients). In total, 40 participants reported 67 serious adverse events; none were considered causally related to vaccination.ConclusionsIn adults aged ≥65 years, the adjuvanted H7N1 vaccine was immunogenic after 2 doses, and had an acceptable safety profile.www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01949090.     

Immunogenicity and safety of the new intradermal influenza vaccine in adults and elderly: A randomized phase 1/2 clinical trial

BackgroundRecent clinical evidence indicates that an intradermal (ID) delivery of vaccines confers superior immunogenicity as compared to a standard intramusclular or subcutaneous (SC) delivery.MethodsIn this exploratory study, 600 healthy adults were randomized to 6 study groups with subgroups of young adults (20–64 years old) and older adults (65 years and older). The subjects were either injected by a novel ID injection system with a single dose of 6, 9, or 15 μg HA or two doses (21 days apart) of 15 μg HA per strain or injected by an SC injection method with a single or two doses (21 days apart) of 15 μg HA per strain. Immunogenicity was assessed using hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titer and microneutralization titer on Days 0, 10, 21, and 42. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events were recorded for 7 and 21 days post-vaccination, respectively.ResultsIn both young adults and older adults groups, the geometric titer (GMT) ratios of HAI in the ID 15 μg HA group were higher than those in the SC 15 μg HA group on both Day 10 and Day 21, while those in the ID 6 and ID 9 μg HA groups were comparable with those in the SC 15 μg HA group. The kinetics of GMTs of HAI suggested that the ID vaccine has the potential to induce the prompt immune response, which is rather hampered in older adults as seen in the SC vaccine groups. The injection-site AEs were generally mild and transient, and did not occur in a dose or dosage-dependent manner.ConclusionsThe results of this study clearly suggest that the immunologic profile of the ID vaccine is better than that of the SC vaccine, while the safety profile of the ID vaccine is similar to that of the SC vaccine. In this exploratory study with almost 100 subjects per each group, single or two-dose administration of the ID vaccine containing 15 μg HA was suggested to be an appropriate regimen in order to prevent influenza and to reduce the associated disease burden.Trial registrationJAPIC Clinical Trials Information (JapicCTI-132096).     

Immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine compared with two trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines containing alternate B strains in adults: A phase 3, randomized noninferiority study

BackgroundVaccination is the most effective means of influenza prevention. Efficacy of trivalent vaccines may be enhanced by including both B strain lineages. This phase 3, double-blind study assessed the immunogenicity and safety/tolerability of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) versus the United States (US)-licensed 2014–2015 trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3-Yamagata [IIV3-YAM]; Afluria) and IIV3 containing the alternate Victoria B strain (IIV3-VIC) in adults ≥18 years.MethodsParticipants (n = 3484) were randomized 2:1:1 and stratified by age to receive IIV4 (n = 1741), IIV3-YAM (n = 871), or IIV3-VIC (n = 872). The primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority of the immunological response to IIV4 versus IIV3-YAM and IIV3-VIC. Noninferiority was assessed by hemagglutination inhibition geometric mean titer (GMT) ratio (IIV3/IIV4; upper bound of two-sided 95% confidence interval [CI] ≤ 1.5) and seroconversion rate (SCR) difference (IIV3 – IIV4; upper bound of two-sided 95% CI ≤ 10%) for vaccine strains. Solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs) were assessed for 7 days postvaccination, AEs recorded for 28 days postvaccination, and serious AEs for 6 months postvaccination.ResultsIIV4 elicited a noninferior immune response for matched strains, and superior response for unmatched B strains not contained in IIV3 comparators. Adjusted GMT ratios (95% CI) for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/YAM, and B/VIC strains were 0.93 (0.88, 0.99), 0.93 (0.88, 0.98), 0.87 (IIV3-YAM; 0.82, 0.93), and 0.95 (IIV3-VIC; 0.88, 1.03), respectively. Corresponding values for SCR differences (95% CI) were −1.1 (−4.5, 2.3), −1.7 (−5.0, 1.7), −3.2 (IIV3-YAM; −7.4, 0.9), and −1.6 (IIV3-VIC; −5.8, 2.5). AEs were generally mild and experienced by 52.9% of participants. Serious AEs were reported with a slightly higher frequency with IIV4 (2.3%) versus IIV3-YAM (1.6%) and IIV3-VIC (1.5%).ConclusionsIIV4 demonstrated immunological noninferiority to the US-licensed IIV3, and superiority for unmatched B strains not contained in IIV3 comparators. Safety/tolerability profiles were similar across vaccine groups.Funding: Seqirus; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02214225.     

AS03-adjuvanted H7N1 detergent-split virion vaccine is highly immunogenic in unprimed mice and induces cross-reactive antibodies to emerged H7N9 and additional H7 subtypes

Avian H7 is one of several influenza A virus subtypes that have the potential to cause pandemics. Herein we describe preclinical results following administration of an investigational H7N1 inactivated detergent-split virion vaccine adjuvanted with the AS03 Adjuvant System. The adjuvanted H7N1 vaccine was highly immunogenic compared to the non-adjuvanted H7N1 vaccine in unprimed mice with less than 100 ng of hemagglutinin antigen per dose. In addition, compared to the non-adjuvanted vaccine, the AS03-adjuvanted H7N1 vaccine also induced robust HI and VN antibody responses that cross-reacted with other H7 subtypes, including recently emerged H7N9 virus. These H7 data from the preclinical mouse model add to the existing H5 data to suggest that AS03 adjuvant technology may be generally effective for formulating antigen-sparing detergent-split virion vaccines against intrinsically sub-immunogenic avian influenza A virus subtypes.     

Immunogenicity and safety of double versus standard dose of the seasonal influenza vaccine in solid-organ transplant recipients: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe use of vaccines with higher doses of antigen is an attractive strategy to improve the immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in transplant recipients. However, the effect of vaccination with a double-dose (DD) containing 30 µg of antigen in this population remains unknown.MethodsWe performed a randomized controlled trial to compare the immunogenicity and safety of DD (30 µg) vs. standard dose (SD, 15 µg) of a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in kidney and liver transplant recipients. Immunogenicity was assessed by hemagglutination-inhibition assay. Vaccine response was defined as seroconversion to at least one viral strain 2 weeks after vaccination and seroprotection as a titer ≥40.ResultsSixty-three kidney and 16 liver transplant recipients were enrolled. Forty patients received the DD and 39 the SD vaccine. Overall, 40% of patients in the DD compared to 26% in the SD group (P = 0.174) responded to vaccine. In the DD arm, more patients were seroprotected to all viral strains after vaccination (88% vs 69%, P = 0.048). Post vaccination geometric mean titers of antibodies were 131.9 vs. 89.7 (P = 0.187) for H1N1, 185.4 vs. 138.7 (P = 0.182) for H3N2, and 96.6 vs. 68.8 (P = 0.081) for influenza B with the DD vs. SD. In both groups, most of the adverse events were mild and no vaccine-related severe adverse events were observed.ConclusionDouble-dose influenza vaccine is safe and may increase antibody response in transplant recipients. In this population, DD vaccination could be an alternative when high-dose vaccine is not available. NCT02746783.     

Immunogenicity,reactogenicity and safety of 2 doses of an adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine administered 2, 6 or 12 months apart in older adults: Results of a phase III,randomized, open-label,multicenter study

BackgroundIn phase III trials, 2 doses of a herpes zoster (HZ) subunit vaccine (HZ/su; 50 µg varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein E [gE] and AS01_B Adjuvant System) administered 2-months apart in older adults (≥50 and ≥70 years) demonstrated >90% efficacy in preventing HZ and had a clinically acceptable safety profile. Here we report immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety following administration of 2 HZ/su doses at intervals longer than 2 months.MethodsIn this Phase III, open-label trial conducted in the US and Estonia, 354 adults ≥50 years were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 2 HZ/su doses 2, 6, or 12 months apart. gE-specific humoral immune responses were evaluated at pre-vaccination, 1 and 12 months post-dose 2. Co-primary objectives were to compare immune responses to HZ/su 1 month post-dose 2 when given 6-months or 12-months apart to those administered 2-months apart. For each participant, safety information was collected from dose 1 to 12 months post-dose 2.Results346 participants completed the study and 343 were included in the according-to-protocol cohort for immunogenicity. One month post-dose 2, vaccine response rates were 96.5% (97.5% confidence interval [CI]: 90.4; 99.2) and 94.5% (97.5% CI: 87.6; 98.3) for the 0, 6- and 0, 12-month schedules, respectively, both schedules meeting the pre-defined criterion. Non-inferiority of anti-gE geometric mean concentrations was demonstrated for HZ/su administered on 0, 6-month compared to a 0, 2-month schedule; however, HZ/su administered on a 0, 12-month schedule did not meet the non-inferiority criterion. Injection site pain was the most commonly reported solicited adverse event (AE). 26 participants each reported at least 1 serious AE; none were assessed as related to vaccination.ConclusionsImmune responses to HZ/su administered at 0, 6-month were non-inferior to those elicited by a 0, 2-month schedule. HZ/su exhibited a clinically acceptable safety profile for all dosing intervals.Clinical Trials Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01751165).     

Immunogenicity and safety of an E. coli-produced bivalent human papillomavirus (type 16 and 18) vaccine: A randomized controlled phase 2 clinical trial

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the dosage, immunogenicity and safety profile of a novel human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 bivalent vaccine produced by E. coli.MethodsThis randomized, double-blinded, controlled phase 2 trial enrolled women aged 18–25 years in China. Totally 1600 eligible participants were randomized to receive 90 μg, 60 μg, or 30 μg of the recombinant HPV 16/18 bivalent vaccine or the control hepatitis B vaccine on a 0, 1 and 6 month schedule. The designated doses are the combined micrograms of HPV16 and 18 VLPs with dose ratio of 2:1. The immunogenicity of the vaccines was assessed by measuring anti-HPV 16 and 18 neutralizing antibodies and total IgG antibodies. Safety of the vaccine was assessed.ResultsAll but one of the seronegative participants who received 3 doses of the HPV vaccines seroconverted at month 7 for anti-HPV 16/18 neutralizing antibodies and IgG antibodies. For HPV 16, the geometric mean titers (GMTs) of the neutralizing antibodies were similar between the 60 μg (GMT = 10,548) and 90 μg (GMT = 12,505) HPV vaccine groups and were significantly higher than those in the 30 μg (GMT = 7596) group. For HPV 18, the GMTs of the neutralizing antibodies were similar among the 3 groups. The HPV vaccine was well tolerated. No vaccine-associated serious adverse events were identified.ConclusionThe prokaryotic-expressed HPV vaccine is safe and immunogenic in women aged 18–25 years. The 60 μg dosage formulation was selected for further investigation for efficacy.Clinical trials registration: NCT01356823.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a trivalent recombinant PcpA,PhtD, and PlyD1 pneumococcal protein vaccine in adults,toddlers, and infants: A phase I randomized controlled study

BackgroundPneumococcal protein vaccines (PPrVs) may provide improved protection over currently available polysaccharide and conjugated polysaccharide vaccines. Here, we examined the safety and immunogenicity of a trivalent recombinant PPrV containing PcpA, PhtD, and PlyD1.MethodsThis was a phase I, single-center, randomized, observer-blind study with safety review between cohorts. Adults (18–50 years; n = 30) and then toddlers (12–13 months; n = 30) were randomized 2:1 to receive aluminum-adjuvanted trivalent PPrV (PPrV + adj) containing 50 μg per antigen or placebo. Infants (42–49 days; n = 220) were next randomized to be injected at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age with 10 μg PPrV + adj or placebo (n = 60; 2:1); 25 μg PPrV + adj, 25 μg unadjuvanted PPrV, or placebo (n = 100; 2:2:1); and 50 μg PPrV + adj or placebo (n = 60; 2:1). Solicited reactions were recorded for 7 days and unsolicited adverse events for 30 days after each vaccination. Concentrations of antibodies to the three vaccine antigens were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.ResultsTenderness/pain was the most frequent injection-site reaction. Abnormal crying and irritability (infants), loss of appetite (toddlers), and headache, malaise, and myalgia (adults) were the most frequent systemic reactions. Reactions were mostly mild or moderate, resolved within 3 days, were not adjuvant- or dose-dependent, and were not increased by repeated vaccination. No immediate adverse events, hypersensitivity reactions, or treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. In all PPrV + adj cohorts, at least 75% of subjects had a ≥2-fold increase in all three antibody concentrations. In infants, antibody concentrations were higher with PPrV + adj than with unadjuvanted PPrV, higher with three than two vaccinations, and similar at the different vaccine doses.ConclusionsThe candidate trivalent PPrV was safe and immunogenic in adults, toddlers, and infants. Addition of aluminum adjuvant improved immunogenicity in infants without changing the safety profile.     

Incidence of narcolepsy before and after MF59-adjuvanted influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination in South Korean soldiers

BackgroundPrevious reports mostly from Europe suggested an association between an occurrence of narcolepsy and an influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine adjuvanted with AS03 (Pandemrix^®). During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic vaccination campaign, the Korean military performed a vaccination campaign with one type of influenza vaccine containing MF59-adjuvants. This study was conducted to investigate the background incidence rate of narcolepsy in South Korean soldiers and the association of the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine with the occurrence of narcolepsy in a young adult group.MethodsTo assess the incidence of narcolepsy, we retrospectively reviewed medical records of suspicious cases of narcolepsy in 2007–2013 in the whole 20 military hospitals of the Korean military. The screened cases were classified according to the Brighton Collaboration case definition of narcolepsy. After obtaining the number of confirmed cases of narcolepsy per 3 months in 2007–2013, we compared the crude incidence rate of narcolepsy before and after the vaccination campaign.ResultsWe included 218 narcolepsy suspicious cases in the initial review, which were screened by the diagnostic code on the computerized disease registry in 2007–2013. Forty-one cases were finally diagnosed with narcolepsy in 2007–2013 (male sex, 95%; median age, 21 years). The average background incidence rate of narcolepsy in Korean soldiers was 0.91 cases per 100,000 persons per year. During the 9 months before vaccination implementation (April to December 2009), 6 narcolepsy cases occurred, whereas during the next 9 months (January to September 2010) including the 3-month vaccination campaign, 5 cases occurred.ConclusionsThe incidence of narcolepsy in South Korean soldiers was not increased after the pandemic vaccination campaign using the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine. Our results suggest that the MF59-adjuvanted H1N1 vaccine did not contribute to the occurrence of narcolepsy in this young adult group.     

Immunogenicity and safety of the quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine MenACWY-TT co-administered with a combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine versus their separate administration in adolescents and young adults: A phase III,randomized study

BackgroundThis study evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine using tetanus (T) toxoid as carrier protein (MenACWY-TT) co-administered with combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) versus their separate administration in adolescents and young adults.MethodsIn this phase III, randomized, partially-blind study (NCT01767376), healthy 11–25-year-olds (N = 660) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive MenACWY-TT and Tdap at Month 0 (Co-ad group), MenACWY-TT at Month 0 and Tdap at Month 1 (ACWY_Tdap group) or Tdap at Month 0 and MenACWY-TT at Month 1 (Tdap_ACWY group). Immune responses to MenACWY-TT were measured by serum bactericidal assay using rabbit complement (rSBA). Anti-diphtheria (D), anti-tetanus (T), anti-pertussis toxin (PT), anti-filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) and anti-pertactin (PRN) antibody concentrations were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Non-inferiority of immunogenicity was assessed using pre-defined clinical criteria. Safety was also evaluated.ResultsNon-inferiority of immunogenicity of MenACWY-TT and Tdap when co-administered versus their separate administration was demonstrated in terms of rSBA geometric mean titers (GMTs) for 4 meningococcal serogroups and of the percentage of participants with antibody concentrations >1 IU/ml for D and T. Among the pertussis antigens, non-inferiority criteria for geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) were reached for PT, but not met for FHA and PRN. Across all groups, ≥93.2% of participants had vaccine responses to each meningococcal serogroup, ≥99.1% were seroprotected against T and D, and ≥85.5% had booster responses to each pertussis antigen. Robust increases in antibody GMTs/GMCs were observed for all antigens between pre-and post-vaccination. Both vaccines had clinically acceptable safety profiles.ConclusionImmune responses to MenACWY-TT and to the T and D antigens from Tdap were not impacted by their co-administration. The lower antibody concentrations observed against the pertussis components may be of limited clinical relevance since robust anti-pertussis booster responses were observed. This study supports concurrent administration of the 2 vaccines in adolescents.     

Immunogenicity and safety of one or two doses of the quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine MenACWY-TT given alone or with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in toddlers: A phase III,open-label,randomised study

BackgroundWe evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of 1 and 2 doses of quadrivalent meningococcal serogroup A, C, W and Y tetanus toxoid-conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-TT) given alone or co-administered with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in toddlers.MethodsIn this phase III, open-label, controlled, multicentre study (NCT01939158), healthy toddlers aged 12–14 months were randomised into 4 groups to receive 1 dose of MenACWY-TT at month (M) 0 (ACWY_1), 2 doses of MenACWY-TT at M0 and M2 (ACWY_2), MenACWY-TT and PCV13 at M0 (Co-ad), or PCV13 at M0 and MenACWY-TT at M2 (PCV13/ACWY). Immune responses were assessed 1 month post-each vaccination. Solicited and unsolicited symptoms were recorded for 4 and 31 days post-each vaccination, respectively; serious adverse events (SAEs) and new onset of chronic illnesses (NOCIs) up to M9 from first vaccination.Results802 toddlers were vaccinated. Post-dose 1 of MenACWY-TT, ≥92.8% of toddlers had rSBA titres ≥1:8, and ≥62.5% had hSBA titres ≥1:4 for each meningococcal serogroup. Post-dose 2 of MenACWY-TT, rSBA titres ≥1:8 were observed in ≥98.0% and hSBA titres ≥1:4 in ≥95.3% of toddlers. Percentages of toddlers with hSBA titres ≥1:4 were higher after 2 doses versus 1 dose of MenACWY-TT for MenW (97.1% versus 62.5–68.9%) and MenY (95.3% versus 64.3–67.6%). Non-inferiority of immune responses to co-administered MenACWY-TT and PCV13 over their separate administration was demonstrated. AEs incidence was comparable among groups. SAEs were reported for 4.9%, 5.1%, 5.5% and 7.5%, and NOCIs for 2.0%, 3.0%, 0.5% and 3.5% of toddlers in the ACWY_1, ACWY_2, Co-ad and PCV13/ACWY groups, respectively; 4 SAEs reported in 3 toddlers were vaccine-related. Two fatal vaccine-unrelated SAEs were reported.ConclusionMenACWY-TT was immunogenic when administered as a single dose at 12–14 months of age. A second dose in toddlers increased hSBA responses against MenW and MenY. MenACWY-TT and PCV13 can be co-administered without impairing the immunogenicity or safety profile of either vaccine.     

Immunogenicity and safety of the 4CMenB and MenACWY-CRM meningococcal vaccines administered concomitantly in infants: A phase 3b,randomized controlled trial

BackgroundInvasive meningococcal disease has its highest incidence in infants. Co-administration of serogroup B (4CMenB) and quadrivalent conjugate (MenACWY-CRM) vaccines could protect against 5 clinically-relevant meningococcal serogroups.MethodsThis phase 3b, open, multicenter study (NCT02106390), conducted in Mexico and Argentina, enrolled and randomized (1:1:1) 750 healthy infants to receive either 4CMenB co-administered with MenACWY-CRM (4CMenB/MenACWY group), 4CMenB (4CMenB group), or MenACWY-CRM alone (MenACWY group) at ages 3, 5, 7 and 13 months. Non-inferiority of immune responses of co-administration to single administration of vaccines was assessed at 1 month post-booster dose (primary objective). Immunogenicity was evaluated pre- and 1 month post-primary and booster vaccinations using human serum bactericidal assay (hSBA). Safety was assessed.ResultsAt 1 month post-booster vaccination, between-group hSBA geometric mean titer (GMT) ratios ranged from 0.89 to 1.03 for serogroup B strains (group 4CMenB/MenACWY over 4CMenB), and from 1.05 to 2.48 for ACWY serogroups (group 4CMenB/MenACWY over MenACWY). The lower limit of the 2-sided 95% confidence intervals for all GMT ratios was >0.5; the primary objective was demonstrated. Across all groups and serogroup B strains, 68–100% and 87–100% of children had hSBA titers ≥5 at 1 month post-primary and booster vaccination, respectively. For serogroups ACWY, ≥96% (post-primary vaccination) and ≥98% (post-booster vaccination) of children in all groups had hSBA titers ≥4. Post-booster vaccination, GMTs increased ≥5.99-fold from pre-booster values for each strain/serogroup. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in groups 4CMenB/MenACWY and 4CMenB than in MenACWY; incidence of all other AEs was similar between groups. Serious AEs were reported for 6, 13, and 11 participants in groups 4CMenB/MenACWY, 4CMenB, and MenACWY, respectively; 1 (group 4CMenB) was considered vaccine-related.ConclusionImmune responses elicited by co-administration of 4CMenB and MenACWY-CRM was non-inferior to single immunization. Co-administration of vaccines was immunogenic and well tolerated in infants.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02106390.An Audio Summary linked to this article that can be found on Figshare https://figshare.com/articles/Immunogenicity_and_safety_of_the_4CMenB_and_MenACWY-CRM_meningococcal_vaccines_administered_concomitantly_in_infants_-_A_phase_3b_randomized_controlled_trial/9945050.     

A comparative evaluation of two investigational meningococcal ABCWY vaccine formulations: Results of a phase 2 randomized,controlled trial

BackgroundA meningococcal vaccine protective against all major disease-associated serogroups (A, B, C, W and Y) is an unmet public health need. In this phase 2 observer-blinded, randomized, controlled study, two investigational meningococcal ABCWY vaccine formulations were evaluated to assess their immunological noninferiority to a licensed quadrivalent meningococcal ACWY glycoconjugate vaccine (MenACWY-CRM) for serogroups ACWY and immunogenicity against serogroup B test strains, as well as for formulation selection based on a desirability index (DI). Each investigational MenABCWY formulation contained recombinant protein and outer membrane vesicle (OMV) components of a licensed serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) combined with components of MenACWY-CRM.MethodsA total of 484 healthy 10–25 year-old participants were randomized to receive two doses, two months apart, of an investigational MenABCWY formulation that contained either a full or one-quarter dose of OMV, 4CMenB alone, or a Placebo followed by MenACWY-CRM. Immunogenicity against each of serogroups ACWY and four serogroup B test strains was assessed by serum bactericidal assay with human complement (hSBA). MenABCWY formulations were compared by a DI based on key immunogenicity and reactogenicity parameters.ResultsSeroresponse rates for serogroups ACWY were significantly higher after two doses of either MenABCWY formulation than after one dose of MenACWY-CRM: respectively, A: 90–92% vs. 73%; C: 93–95% vs. 63%; W: 80–84% vs. 65%; and Y: 90–92% vs. 75%. Prespecified noninferiority criteria were met. Both MenABCWY formulations induced substantial immune responses against serogroup B test strains, although 4CMenB responses were higher. Overall DIs for both MenABCWY formulations were similar. Reactogenicity profiles of the MenABCWY formulations were similar to each other and to that of 4CMenB. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported.ConclusionsBoth investigational MenABCWY formulations elicited robust immune responses against serogroups ACWY and serogroup B test strains, and had acceptable reactogenicity profiles, with no safety concerns identified.     

Waning vaccine protection against influenza A (H3N2) illness in children and older adults during a single season

BackgroundRecent studies have suggested that vaccine-induced protection against influenza may decline within one season. We reanalyzed data from a study of influenza vaccine effectiveness to determine if time since vaccination was an independent predictor of influenza A (H3N2).MethodsPatients with acute respiratory illness were actively recruited during the 2007–2008 season. Respiratory swabs were tested for influenza, and vaccination dates were determined by a validated immunization registry. The association between influenza RT-PCR result and vaccination interval (days) was examined using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for calendar time, age and other confounders.ResultsThere were 629 vaccinated participants, including 177 influenza A (H3N2) cases and 452 test negative controls. The mean (SD) interval from vaccination to illness onset was 101.7 (25.9) days for influenza cases and 93.0 (29.9) days for controls. There was a significant association between vaccination interval and influenza result in the main effects model. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for influenza was 1.12 (CI 1.01, 1.26) for every 14 day increase in the vaccination interval. Age modified the association between vaccination interval and influenza (p = 0.005 for interaction). Influenza was associated with increasing vaccination interval in young children and older adults, but not in adolescents or non-elderly adults. Similar results were found when calendar week of vaccine receipt was assessed as the primary exposure variable.ConclusionsIdentification of influenza A (H3N2) was associated with increasing time since vaccination among young children and older adults during a single influenza season.     

Improved immunogenicity of high-dose influenza vaccine compared to standard-dose influenza vaccine in adult oncology patients younger than 65 years receiving chemotherapy: A pilot randomized clinical trial

PurposePatients undergoing chemotherapy often fail to develop robust responses to influenza vaccination. Compared to standard-dose influenza vaccine (SD), high-dose influenza vaccine (HD) has shown improved immunogenicity and protection against influenza illness in adults 65 years and older. This study compared the immunogenicity and tolerability of HD to SD in adults younger than 65 years of age receiving chemotherapy.MethodsThis double-blind study randomized patients receiving chemotherapy to vaccination with either SD or HD influenza vaccine. Hemagglutination inhibition assays (HAI) were performed prior to and 4 weeks after vaccination. HAI were summarized as geometric mean titers (GMT), seroconversion rates, and seroprotection rates.ResultsA total of 105 subjects were enrolled in the trial (51 received SD and 54 received HD). Subjects were well matched for demographic and medical conditions. Both vaccines were well tolerated with no SAEs. Of the 100 subjects with evaluable data, seroconversion rates for all 3 influenza antigens & post-vaccination GMTs for H3N2 & B strains were significantly improved with HD compared to SD. Seroprotection was excellent and equivalent in both groups.ConclusionsTrivalent high-dose influenza vaccine can be safely administered to patients receiving chemotherapy with improved immunogenicity and seroconversion compared to standard-dose vaccine. Post-vaccination seroprotection rates were similar in both groups. A larger study is needed to show clinical benefits with HD in this population.This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01666782.     

A phase 1 study of safety and immunogenicity following intradermal administration of a tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate

BackgroundAs part of the ongoing search for an effective dengue vaccine, Takeda performed a phase 1b study to investigate the safety and immunogenicity of an early low-dose tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate formulation (LD-TDV), based on an attenuated serotype 2 backbone, when administered intradermally with an injector device (PharmaJet®), or needle-syringe.MethodsThe study was performed in two centers in the US, in healthy 18–45 year old subjects with no history of dengue vaccination or disease. One or two vaccine doses were given on Day 0, and another dose or placebo on Day 90. Neutralizing antibodies were measured up to Day 270; safety was assessed as laboratory measurements and solicited and unsolicited adverse events on diary cards.ResultsChanges in World Health Organization prequalification guidance for new vaccines concerning storage conditions favored the use of lyophilized preparations, and led to the early cessation of enrolment, but not before 67 subjects were enrolled in four treatment groups. Sixty-five subjects completed the planned schedule. There were no safety signals or serious adverse events. All vaccination regimens elicited neutralizing antibodies. Titers of neutralizing antibodies against serotypes 1 and 2 were higher than those against serotypes 3 and 4. There were no consistent increases in responses with two doses given either concomitantly or 90 days apart.ConclusionsSimultaneous injection of two LD-TDV doses was shown to have the potential to improve seroconversion rates to serotypes 1 and 2, and to increase serotype 2 antibody titers. A primary dose of LD-TDV administered by PharmaJet was shown to induce more rapid seroconversion to serotypes 1, 2, and 3 compared with administration by needle-syringe (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01765426).     

Novel influenza vaccine M2SR protects against drifted H1N1 and H3N2 influenza virus challenge in ferrets with pre-existing immunity

Current influenza vaccines do not provide effective protection against heterologous influenza viruses. The ability of the novel M2SR influenza vaccine to protect against drifted influenza viruses was evaluated in naïve ferrets and in ferrets with pre-existing immunity to influenza. In naïve ferrets, M2SR provided similar protection against drifted challenge viruses as the comparator vaccine, FluMist®. However, in ferrets with pre-existing immunity, M2SR provided superior protection than FluMist in two model systems.In the first model, ferrets were infected with influenza A H1N1pdm and influenza B viruses to mimic the diverse influenza exposure in humans. The pre-infected ferrets, seropositive to H1N1pdm and influenza B but seronegative to H3N2, were then vaccinated with H3N2 M2SR or monovalent H3N2 FluMist virus (A/Brisbane/10/2007, clade 1) and challenged 6 weeks later with a drifted H3N2 virus (clade 3C.2a). Antibody titers to Brisbane/10/2007 were higher in M2SR vaccinated ferrets than in FluMist vaccinated ferrets in the pre-infected ferrets whereas the opposite was observed in naïve ferrets. After challenge with drifted H3N2 virus, M2SR provided superior protection than FluMist monovalent vaccine.In the second model, the impact of homologous pre-existing immunity upon vaccine-induced protection was evaluated. Ferrets, pre-infected with H1N1pdm virus, were vaccinated 90 days later with H1N1pdm M2SR or FluMist monovalent vaccine and challenged 6 weeks later with a pre-pandemic seasonal H1N1 virus, A/Brisbane/59/2007 (Bris59). While cross-reactive serum IgG antibodies against the Bris59 HA were detected after vaccination, anti-Bris59 hemagglutination inhibition antibodies were only detected post-challenge. M2SR provided better protection against Bris59 challenge than FluMist suggesting that homologous pre-existing immunity affected FluMist virus to a greater degree than M2SR.These results suggest that the single replication intranasal M2SR vaccine provides effective protection against drifted influenza A viruses not only in naïve ferrets but also in those with pre-existing immunity in contrast to FluMist viruses.     

Reduced schedules of 4CMenB vaccine in infants and catch-up series in children: Immunogenicity and safety results from a randomised open-label phase 3b trial

BackgroundThis study evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of a licensed meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) administered alone according to reduced schedules in infants or catch-up series in children.MethodsIn this open-label, multicentre, phase 3b study (NCT01339923), infants randomised 1:1:1 received 4CMenB: 2 + 1 doses at 3½–5–11 months or 6–8–11 months of age, 3 + 1 doses at ages 2½–3½–5–11 months. Children aged 2–10 years received 2 catch-up doses administered 2 months apart. Immune responses were measured by hSBA assays against 4 strains specific for vaccine components fHbp, NadA, PorA and NHBA. Sufficiency of immune responses was defined in groups with 2 + 1 doses schedules as a lower limit ≥70% for the 97.5% confidence interval of the percentage of infants with hSBA titres ≥4, 1 month post-dose 2 for fHbp, NadA, PorA. Adverse events were collected for 7 days post-vaccination; serious adverse events (SAEs) throughout the study.Results754 infants and 404 children were enrolled. Post-primary vaccination, 98–100% of infants across all groups developed hSBA titres ≥4 for fHbp, NadA, PorA, and 48–77% for NHBA. Sufficiency of immune responses in infants receiving 2 + 1 schedules was demonstrated for fHbp, NadA, PorA after 2 doses of 4CMenB, as pre-specified criteria were met. Following receipt of 2 catch-up doses, 95–99% of children developed hSBA titres ≥4 for 4CMenB components. Similar safety profiles were observed across groups. A total of 45 SAEs were reported, 3 of which were related to vaccination.ConclusionReduced infant schedules and catch-up series in children were immunogenic and safe, having the potential to widen 4CMenB vaccine coverage.FundingGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.     

A phase II randomized study to determine the safety and immunogenicity of the novel PIKA rabies vaccine containing the PIKA adjuvant using an accelerated regimen

BackgroundHuman Rabies infection continues to be potentially fatal despite the availability of post-exposure prophylaxis with rabies vaccine. The PIKA Rabies vaccine adjuvant is a TLR3 agonist and has been shown to be safe and immunogenic in clinical phase I studies.MethodsWe conducted a phase II, open label, randomized study in healthy adults to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the PIKA rabies vaccine under an accelerated regimen. 126 subjects were randomized into two groups: control vaccine classic regimen (“control-classic”) and PIKA vaccine accelerated regimen (“PIKA-accelerated”). Subjects were followed up for safety and rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNA).ResultsBoth the control and PIKA vaccines were generally well tolerated. 57.6% of subjects in the PIKA vaccine group, compared with 43.8% of subjects in the control-classic group, achieved the target RVNA titer of ≥0.5 IU/mL by Day 7. All subjects achieved the target RVNA titer by Day 14. The RVNA geometric mean titer at Day 7 was 0.60 IU/ml in the PIKA vaccine group and 0.39 IU/ml in the control-classic group. At Day 14, the RVNA geometric mean titer was 18.25 IU/ml in the PIKA-accelerated group and 19.24 IU/ml in the control-classic group. The median time taken to reach the target RVNA titer level of ≥0.5 IU/mL was 7.0 days (95% CI: 7.0–42.0 days) in the PIKA-accelerated group and 14.0 days (95% CI: 7.0–42.0 days) in the control-classic group.ConclusionThe accelerated regimen using the investigational PIKA Rabies vaccine was well-tolerated and demonstrated non-inferior immunogenicity compared to the classic regimen using the commercially available vaccine in healthy adults.Clinical trial registry: The study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02956421).