Phase I study of the HER3-targeted antibody patritumab (U3-1287) combined with erlotinib in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer

ObjectivesHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) is a key dimerization partner for HER family members and is associated with resistance to other HER family receptor-targeted therapeutics. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of patritumab (U3-1287), a fully human anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody, in combination with erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methodsThis study enrolled patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1, life expectancy >3 months and who had progressed after at least one prior course of chemotherapy (excluding erlotinib). This open-label study included two parts: dose escalation (Part 1) and dose expansion (Part 2). In Part 1, patients received intravenous patritumab 9 or 18 mg/kg every 3 weeks in addition to per-oral erlotinib 150 mg/day daily. In Part 2, patients received the recommended dose of patritumab as determined in Part 1. Adverse event rates, pharmacokinetics and tumor responses were determined.ResultsTwenty-four Japanese patients received patritumab at 9 mg/kg (n = 3) or 18 mg/kg (n = 21), and erlotinib. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported, indicating the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal or skin toxicities, which were generally mild and manageable. Patritumab pharmacokinetics were similar to those reported in previous studies. The median progression-free survival (95% confidence interval) was 44.0 (22.0–133.0) days for the EGFR wild-type group (n = 9) and 107.0 (74.0–224.0) days for the EGFR-activating mutation group (n = 13). Evaluation of biomarkers by immunohistochemical analysis did not indicate a relationship between efficacy and HER3 expression in tumor tissues.ConclusionPatritumab in combination with erlotinib was well tolerated and the efficacy of the combination was encouraging, especially in patients where prior gefitinib treatment failed.     

A phase III,randomized, open-label study of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with advanced stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundASP8273, a novel, small molecule, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) specifically inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in patients with activating mutations or EGFR T790M resistance mutations. The current study examines the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations not previously treated with an EGFR inhibitor.Patients and methodsThis global, phase III, open-label, randomized study evaluated ASP8273 versus erlotinib/gefitinib in patients with locally advanced, metastatic, or unresectable stage IIIB/IV NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations. They were ineligible if they received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary end points included overall survival, investigator-assessed PFS, best overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate, duration of response (DoR), and the safety/tolerability profile.ResultsPatients (n = 530) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive ASP8273 (n = 267) or erlotinib/gefitinib (n = 263). Patient demographics between both treatment groups were generally balanced. Median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.6–11.1 months) for patients receiving ASP8273 and 9.6 months (95% CI 8.8–NE) for the erlotinib/gefitinib group, with a hazard ratio of 1.611 (P = 0.992). The ORR in the ASP8273 group was 33% (95% CI 27.4–39.0) versus 47.9% (95% CI 41.7–54.1) in the erlotinib/gefitinib group. Median DoR was similar for both groups (9.2 months for ASP8273 versus 9.0 months for erlotinib/gefitinib). More grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in patients receiving ASP8273 than in those receiving erlotinib/gefitinib (54.7% versus 43.5%). An independent data monitoring committee carried out an interim safety analysis and recommended discontinuing the study due to toxicity and limited predicted efficacy of ASP8273 relative to erlotinib/gefitinib.ConclusionsFirst-line ASP8273 did not show improved PFS or equivalent toxicities versus erlotinib/gefitinib.ClinicalTrial.gov numberNCT02588261.     

A phase II study of erlotinib in gemcitabine refractory advanced pancreatic cancer

BackgroundErlotinib induced skin toxicity has been associated with clinical benefit in several tumour types. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy of erlotinib, dose escalated to rash, in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine.MethodsErlotinib was given at an initial dose of 150 mg/day, and the dose was escalated by 50 mg every 2 weeks (to a maximum of 300 mg/day) until >grade 1 rash or other dose limiting toxicities occurred. Erlotinib pharmacokinetics were performed, and baseline tumour tissue was collected for mutational analysis and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression. The primary end-point was the disease control rate (objective response and stable disease >8 weeks).ResultsFifty-one patients were accrued, and 49 received treatment. Dose-escalation to 200–300 mg of erlotinib was possible in 9/49 (18%) patients. The most common ⩾grade 3 adverse events included fatigue (6%), rash (4%) and diarrhoea (4%). Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for response, and the best response was stable disease in 12 patients (32% (95% confidence interval (CI) 17–47%)). Disease control was observed in nine patients (24% (95% CI: 10–38%)). Median survival was 3.8 months, and 6 month overall survival rate was 32% (95% CI 19–47%). Mutational analysis and EGFR expression were performed on 29 patients, with 93% having KRAS mutations, none having EGFR mutations, and 86% expressing EGFR. Neither KRAS mutational status nor EGFR expression was associated with survival.ConclusionsErlotinib dose escalated to rash was well tolerated but not associated with significant efficacy in non-selected patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Phase I–IIa study of BMS-690514, an EGFR,HER-2 and -4 and VEGFR-1 to -3 oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor,in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumours

PurposeBMS-690514 is a potent, reversible oral inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER-1), HER-2 and -4, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs)-1 to -3 offering targeted inhibition of tumour growth and vascularisation in a single agent. This phase I–IIa study was designed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess safety, antitumour activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of BMS-690514.Patients and methodsIn phase I, patients with advanced solid tumours received escalating doses of once-daily BMS-690514. In phase IIa, erlotinib-naïve (cohort A) or erlotinib-resistant (cohort B) patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received BMS-690514 once-daily at the MTD.ResultsIn phase I (n = 28), the MTD was determined to be 200 mg daily. BMS-690514 was rapidly absorbed and highly metabolised after repeated oral administration with minimum drug accumulation. In phase IIa (n = 62), the most frequent treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea and acneiform rash. Adverse events that led to >1 discontinuation were diarrhoea (n = 4; 4%) and rash (n = 2; 2%). Disease control (?4 months) and objective response rates, respectively, were 43.3% and 3.3% (cohort A) and 22.6% and 3.2% (cohort B). Six of 21 (29%) NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR achieved disease control versus seven of 10 (70%) patients with EGFR mutations (including T790M). At MTD, BMS-690514 modulated pharmacodynamic biomarkers associated with inhibition of VEGFR- and EGFR-signalling pathways.ConclusionThis phase I–IIa study suggests that BMS-690514 has manageable safety profile and antitumour activity in patients with NSCLC at 200 mg/d, including those with EGFR mutations conferring resistance to erlotinib.     

A randomised phase II study of pemetrexed versus pemetrexed + erlotinib as second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

IntroductionPemetrexed and erlotinib have been approved as second-line monotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel phase II study assessed efficacy and safety of pemetrexed versus pemetrexed + erlotinib in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC.MethodsNSCLC stage III–IV patients who failed one prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, ≥1 measurable lesion by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 were eligible. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m² with vitamin B₁₂ and folic acid q3w alone or combined with erlotinib 150 mg daily. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTTF), response and toxicity.ResultsOf 165 randomised non-squamous patients, 159 were treated (pemetrexed: 83; pemetrexed + erlotinib: 76). The median PFS (months; 95% CI) was 2.89 (1.94, 3.38) for pemetrexed versus 3.19 (2.86, 4.70) for pemetrexed + erlotinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% CI: (0.44, 0.90); P = 0.0047). The median OS (months; 95% CI) was 7.75 (5.29, 10.41) for pemetrexed versus 11.83 (8.18, 16.66) for pemetrexed + erlotinib (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.98; P = 0.019). The median TTTF (months: 95% CI) was 2.4 (1.74, 2.99) for pemetrexed versus 3.0 (2.23, 4.07) for pemetrexed + erlotinib (HR 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.89; P = 0.0034). One patient died in pemetrexed + erlotinib arm due to febrile neutropenia. Grades 3/4 drug-related toxicities (in ≥5% of patients) in pemetrexed/pemetrexed + erlotinib were febrile neutropenia (2.4%/10.5%), diarrhoea (1.2%/5.3%), rash (1.2%/9.2%); anaemia (6%/11.8%), leukopenia (9.6%/23.7%), neutropenia (9.6%/25.0%), and thrombocytopenia (4.8%/14.5%).ConclusionsPemetrexed + erlotinib treatment significantly improved PFS, OS and TTTF in 2nd line non-squamous NSCLC and was associated with an increase in grade 3/4 toxicities compared with pemetrexed alone.     

First-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses from the phase III,randomized, open-label,ENSURE study

BackgroundThe phase III, randomized, open-label ENSURE study (NCT01342965) evaluated first-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin (GP) in patients from China, Malaysia and the Philippines with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methodsPatients ≥18 years old with histologically/cytologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2 were randomized 1:1 to receive erlotinib (oral; 150 mg once daily until progression/unacceptable toxicity) or GP [G 1250 mg/m² i.v. days 1 and 8 (3-weekly cycle); P 75 mg/m² i.v. day 1, (3-weekly cycle) for up to four cycles]. Primary end point: investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Other end points include objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsA total of 217 patients were randomized: 110 to erlotinib and 107 to GP. Investigator-assessed median PFS was 11.0 months versus 5.5 months, erlotinib versus GP, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22–0.51; log-rank P < 0.0001]. Independent Review Committee-assessed median PFS was consistent (HR, 0.42). Median OS was 26.3 versus 25.5 months, erlotinib versus GP, respectively (HR, 0.91, 95% CI 0.63–1.31; log-rank P =.607). ORR was 62.7% for erlotinib and 33.6% for GP. Treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 2.7% versus 10.6% of erlotinib and GP patients, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were rash (6.4%) with erlotinib, and neutropenia (25.0%), leukopenia (14.4%), and anemia (12.5%) with GP.ConclusionThese analyses demonstrate that first-line erlotinib provides a statistically significant improvement in PFS versus GP in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (NCT01342965).     

Additional prognostic role of EGFR activating mutations in lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastasis: Integrating with lung specific GPA score

ObjectiveWhile several prognostic models have been presented in NSCLC patients with brain metastasis, none of these models have included molecular markers as an index. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prognostic value of EGFR mutations and to integrate these EGFR mutations into the prognostic index in NSCLC patients with brain metastasis.Materials and methodsWe analyzed retrospectively 292 lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastasis. Clinico-pathological features and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with EGFR mutations and patients with EGFR wild type. EGFR mutation status was integrated with lung specific graded prognostic assessment (GPA) score.ResultsAmong 292 patients, EGFR mutation status was tested in 183 patients. One hundred and five patients (57.4%) had EGFR activating mutations, 14 (7.7%) had EGFR non-activating mutations and 64 (35.0%) had EGFR wild type. OS was significantly longer in patients with EGFR activating mutations than in those with EGFR wild type patients (20.4 vs. 10.1 months, p = 0.002). However, patients with EGFR non-activating mutations did not show superior OS compared with EGFR wild type patients (14.6 vs. 10.1 months, p = 0.83). Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of EGFR activating mutation is an independent positive prognostic factor for OS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.56, p = 0.002).ConclusionsEGFR activating mutations have a prognostic role in lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastasis that is independent of other known prognostic factors. The frequency of EGFR mutation was higher than expected. The presence of EGFR activating mutations should be included as an index in the prognostic models for lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastasis.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics,safety, and preliminary efficacy evaluation of icotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

ObjectivesTo receive pharmacokinetics, safety, and anti-tumor activity of icotinib, a novel epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and methodsPatients (n = 40) with advanced NSCLC were enrolled to receive escalating doses of icotinib, which was administrated on Day 1 followed by 28-day continuous dosing starting from Day 4. Four dosing regimens, 100 mg b.i.d., 150 mg b.i.d., 125 mg t.i.d., and 200 mg b.i.d. were studied. Pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of icotinib were evaluated.ResultsIcotinib was well tolerated in Chinese patients with refractory NSCLC. No toxicity with >3 grades were reported in more than 2 patients under any dose levels. One complete response (3%) and 9 partial responses (23%) were received. Total disease control rate could reach at 73% and median progress-free survival (range) was 154 (17–462) days. PK exposure of icotinib increased with increase of dose in NSCLC patients. Food was suggested to increase PK exposure by ∼30%. Mean t_1/2β was within 5.31–8.07 h. No major metabolite (>10% plasma exposure of icotinib) was found in NSCLC patients.ConclusionsIcotinib with up to 400 mg/day exhibited good tolerance and preliminary antitumor activity in Chinese NSCLC patients. Pharmacokinetics of icotinib and 5 major metabolites were fully investigated in NSCLC patients. Optimized biologic dose (OBD) was finally recommended to be 125 mg t.i.d. for the later clinical study.     

Activity of the Hsp90 inhibitor luminespib among non-small-cell lung cancers harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions

BackgroundThere are currently no approved targeted therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions (ins20), a subgroup of EGFR mutations that are generally refractory to first/second generation EGFR inhibitors. We report the final results of a phase II trial evaluating the activity of the Hsp90 inhibitor luminespib (AUY922) in NSCLC patients with EGFR ins20.Patients and methodsTwenty-nine patients with stage IV NSCLC with EGFR ins20 identified on local testing and at least one prior therapy were enrolled on the trial between August 2013 and October 2016. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), with a pre-determined target rate of effectiveness [defined as the rate of partial response (PR) plus stable disease (SD) lasting ≥3 months] of 20%. Secondary end points were PFS, overall survival (OS), safety and response by EGFR ins20 subtype.ResultsAmong the 29 patients (18 females, median age 60 years) the ORR was 17%, median progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI 1.4–5.6) and median OS (mOS) was 13 months (95% CI 4.9–19.5). The results exceeded the pre-determined target rate of effectiveness with 11/29 (38%) patients having a PR or an SD ≥3 months. The most common luminespib-related toxicities were diarrhea (83%), visual changes (76%) and fatigue (45%). All study treatment was stopped on 28 February 2017 due to dissolution of study drug availability; 3 patients were on treatment at study termination.ConclusionThe study met its primary end point, suggesting that luminespib may be an active therapy for advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR ins20. Luminespib is generally well-tolerated, though reversible low-grade ocular toxicity is common. Further study of luminespib and other hsp90 inhibitors in this population is warranted.Study registration (ClinicalTrials.gov)NCT01854034.     

Cytotoxic chemotherapy may overcome the development of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) therapy

ObjectivesIn the first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been shown to yield a longer progression-free survival (PFS) rate than platinum-doublet chemotherapy; however, after the initial response, most patients develop resistance to the EGFR-TKIs. We hypothesized that the insertion of platinum-doublet chemotherapy after the initial response to EGFR-TKIs might prevent the emergence of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs and prolong survival.MethodsWe carried out a phase II study of the following first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. Gefitinib (250 mg) was administered on days 1–56. Then, after a two-week drug-free period, three cycles of cisplatin (80 mg/m²) and docetaxel (60 mg/m²) were administered on days 71, 92, and 113. Thereafter, gefitinib was re-started on day 134 and continued until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the two-year PFS rate.ResultsA total of 34 patients were enrolled. Of the 33 eligible patients and 12 achieved a two-year PFS. Thus, this therapeutic strategy met the criterion for usefulness. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates were 67.0%, 40.2%, 36.9%, and 22.0%, respectively, and the median PFS was 19.5 months. The 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 90.6%, 71.9%, 64.8%, and 36.5% respectively, and the median survival time was 48.0 months.ConclusionThese results indicate that the insertion of platinum-doublet chemotherapy might prevent the development of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.     

Effect of dose adjustment on the safety and efficacy of afatinib for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma: post hoc analyses of the randomized LUX-Lung 3 and 6 trials

BackgroundAfatinib 40 mg/day is approved for first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the case of drug-related grade ≥3 or selected prolonged grade 2 adverse events (AEs), the dose can be reduced by 10 mg decrements to a minimum of 20 mg. Here, we evaluate the influence of afatinib dose reduction on AEs, pharmacokinetics and progression-free survival (PFS) in the phase III LUX-Lung 3 and 6 (LL3/6) trials.Patients and methodsTreatment-naïve patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC in LL3 (global) and LL6 (China, Thailand, South Korea) were randomized to afatinib or chemotherapy. All afatinib-treated patients (LL3, n = 229; LL6, n = 239) were included in the post hoc analyses. Incidence and severity of common AEs before and after afatinib dose reduction were assessed. Afatinib plasma concentrations were compared in patients who reduced to 30 mg versus those remaining at 40 mg. PFS was compared between patients who dose reduced within the first 6 months of treatment and those who did not.ResultsDose reductions occurred in 53.3% (122/229) and 28.0% (67/239) of patients in LL3 and LL6, respectively; most (86.1% and 82.1%) within the first 6 months of treatment. Dose reduction led to decreases in the incidence of drug-related AEs, and was more likely in patients with higher afatinib plasma concentrations. On day 43, patients who dose reduced to 30 mg (n = 59) had geometric mean afatinib plasma concentrations of 23.3 ng/ml, versus 22.8 ng/ml in patients who remained on 40 mg (n = 284). The median PFS was similar in patients who dose reduced during the first 6 months versus those who did not {LL3: 11.3 versus 11.0 months [hazard ratio (HR) 1.25]; LL6: 12.3 versus 11.0 months (HR 1.00)}.ConclusionsTolerability-guided dose adjustment is an effective measure to reduce afatinib-related AEs without affecting therapeutic efficacy.Clinical trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT00949650 and NCT0112393.     

A phase 1 study of OSI-930 in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced solid tumours

AimTo determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of OSI-930 that can be combined with erlotinib, and establish recommended phase 2 doses when both agents are administered daily in patients with advanced solid tumours.Patients and methodsEligible patients with advanced solid tumours were enrolled into this standard “three + three” dose escalation study. Study treatment commenced on day 1 with OSI-930, and erlotinib was introduced on day 8. PK profiles of OSI-930, erlotinib and its active metabolite, OSI-420, were determined. Changes in sVEGFR2 as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of OSI-930 activity were assessed.ResultsTwenty one patients were enrolled to 1 of 3 cohorts: 200 mg OSI-930 BID + 100 mg erlotinib QD; 200 mg OSI-930 BID + 150 mg erlotinib QD; 300 mg OSI-930 BID + 150 mg erlotinib QD. The most common adverse events were anorexia (85%), diarrhoea (75%), rash (70%) and lethargy (65%). The MTD was not reached but the onset of cumulative toxicity necessitating dose modification after the 28-d DLT assessment period was common at the highest dose level. A PK interaction was identified with co-administration of both agents resulting in a two-fold increase in OSI-930 exposure. Pharmacodynamic activity was observed with a decline in sVEGFR levels detected in all patients. Ten patients had disease stabilization (median duration 119 d).Conclusions200 mg OSI-930 BID + 150 mg erlotinib QD were the recommended doses for further evaluation of this combination.     

Dosing to rash: A phase II trial of the first-line erlotinib for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E3503)

BackgroundThe development of a rash has been retrospectively associated with increased response and improved survival when treated with erlotinib at the standard dose of 150 mg per day. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the association of the activity of erlotinib in the first-line setting in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the development of a tolerable rash via dose escalation of erlotinib or tumour characteristics.MethodsPatients, with advanced NSCLC without prior systemic therapy, were treated with erlotinib 150 mg orally per day. The dose was increased by 25 mg every two weeks until the development of grade 2/tolerable rash or other dose limiting toxicity. Tumour biopsy specimens were required for inclusion.ResultsThe study enrolled 137 patients, 135 were evaluable for safety and 124 were eligible and evaluable for response. Only 73 tumour samples were available for analysis. Erlotinib dose escalation occurred in 69/124 patients. Erlotinib was well tolerated with 70% of patients developing a grade 1/2 rash and 10% developing grade 3 rash. Response rate and disease control rate were 6.5% and 41.1% respectively. Median overall survival was 7.7 months. Toxicity and tumour markers were not associated with response. Grade 2 or greater skin rash and low phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase (pMAPK) were associated with improved survival.ConclusionsOverall survival was similar in this trial compared to first-line chemotherapy in this unselected patient population. Dose escalation to the development of grade 2 skin rash was associated with improved survival in this patient population.     

Improved EGFR mutation detection using combined exosomal RNA and circulating tumor DNA in NSCLC patient plasma

BackgroundA major limitation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for somatic mutation detection has been the low level of ctDNA found in a subset of cancer patients. We investigated whether using a combined isolation of exosomal RNA (exoRNA) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) could improve blood-based liquid biopsy for EGFR mutation detection in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.Patients and methodsMatched pretreatment tumor and plasma were collected from 84 patients enrolled in TIGER-X (NCT01526928), a phase 1/2 study of rociletinib in mutant EGFR NSCLC patients. The combined isolated exoRNA and cfDNA (exoNA) was analyzed blinded for mutations using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel (EXO1000) and compared with existing data from the same samples using analysis of ctDNA by BEAMing.ResultsFor exoNA, the sensitivity was 98% for detection of activating EGFR mutations and 90% for EGFR T790M. The corresponding sensitivities for ctDNA by BEAMing were 82% for activating mutations and 84% for T790M. In a subgroup of patients with intrathoracic metastatic disease (M0/M1a; n = 21), the sensitivity increased from 26% to 74% for activating mutations (P = 0.003) and from 19% to 31% for T790M (P = 0.5) when using exoNA for detection.ConclusionsCombining exoRNA and ctDNA increased the sensitivity for EGFR mutation detection in plasma, with the largest improvement seen in the subgroup of M0/M1a disease patients known to have low levels of ctDNA and poses challenges for mutation detection on ctDNA alone.Clinical TrialsNCT01526928     

Three-arm randomised controlled phase 2 study comparing pemetrexed and erlotinib to either pemetrexed or erlotinib alone as second-line treatment for never-smokers with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundThis randomised controlled phase 2 study compared pemetrexed and erlotinib in combination with either agent alone in terms of efficacy and safety as second-line treatment in a clinically selected population of never-smokers with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsPatients who had failed only one prior chemotherapy regimen and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) ?2 were randomised to either: pemetrexed 500 mg/m² on day 1 plus erlotinib 150 mg daily on days 2–14; erlotinib 150 mg daily; or pemetrexed 500 mg/m² on day 1 of a 21-day cycle until discontinuation criteria were met. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), was analysed using a multivariate Cox model. Firstly, a global comparison across the three arms was performed. If the global null hypothesis was rejected at a two-sided 0.2 significance level, pairwise comparisons of pemetrexed–erlotinib versus erlotinib or pemetrexed were then conducted using the same model. Statistical significance was claimed only if both global and pairwise null hypotheses were rejected at a two-sided 0.05 significance level.FindingsA total of 240 patients (male, 35%; East Asian, 55%; ECOG PS 0–1, 93%) were included. A statistically significant difference in PFS was found across the three arms (global p = 0.003), with pemetrexed–erlotinib significantly better than either single agent: HR = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40–0.81, p = 0.002 versus erlotinib; HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39–0.85, p = 0.005 versus pemetrexed. Median PFS (95% CI) was 7.4 (4.4, 12.9) months in pemetrexed–erlotinib, 3.8 (2.7, 6.3) months in erlotinib and 4.4 (3.0, 6.0) months in pemetrexed. Safety analyses showed a higher incidence of drug-related grade 3/4 toxicity in pemetrexed–erlotinib (60.0%) than in pemetrexed (28.9%) or erlotinib (12.0%); the majority being neutropenia, anaemia, rash and diarrhoea.InterpretationPemetrexed–erlotinib significantly improved PFS compared to either drug alone in this clinically selected population. The combination had more toxicity, but was clinically manageable.     

Comparison of gefitinib and erlotinib efficacies as third-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PurposeThe epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, gefitinib and erlotinib, are used as standard salvage therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the present study was to compare their efficacies in this population.Patients and methodsThe Taiwan Cancer Registry and the National Health Insurance claim databases were searched for newly diagnosed patients with NSCLC from 2004 to 2007 who received gefitinib or erlotinib as third-line therapy. Overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were determined from registered parameters. Treatment efficacies were compared by the log-rank test in total population and subsets with different clinical characteristics. The Cox’s proportion hazard model was used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios in multivariate analyses.ResultsA total of 984 patients who received gefitinib (67%) or erlotinib (33%) were included. Patients receiving gefitinib or erlotinib had similar OS (median, 10.2 versus 9.9 months, p = 0.524) and TTF (median, 5.5 versus 3.4 months, p = 0.103). In multivariate analyses, both treatment groups had similar risk of overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04, p = 0.629) and treatment failure (adjusted HR = 0.94, p = 0.417). Comparing the treatments in subgroups based on age, tumour histology and gender also revealed no differences in OS and TTF. For patients who received gefitinib or erlotinib for more than 3 or 6 months, there was no difference in TTF but patients who received erlotinib had longer OS.ConclusionsGefitinib and erlotinib had similar efficacies as salvage therapy for advanced NSCLC in Taiwan.     

Dovitinib and erlotinib in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A drug–drug interaction

IntroductionErlotinib is a FDA approved small molecule inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor and dovitinib is a novel small molecule inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. This phase 1 trial was conducted to characterize the safety and determine the maximum tolerated dose of erlotinib plus dovitinib in patients with previously treated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.MethodsEscalating dose cohorts of daily erlotinib and dovitinib dosed 5 days on/2 days off, starting after a 2-week lead-in of erlotinib alone, were planned. A potential pharmacokinetic interaction was hypothesized as dovitinib induces CYP1A1/1A2. Only cohort 1 (150 mg erlotinib + 300 mg dovitinib) and cohort -1 (150 mg erlotinib + 200 mg dovitinib) enrolled. Plasma concentrations of erlotinib were measured pre- and post-dovitinib exposure.ResultsTwo of three patients in cohort 1 had a DLT (grade 3 transaminitis and grade 3 syncope). Two of 6 patients in cohort -1 had a DLT (grade 3 pulmonary embolism and grade 3 fatigue); thus, the study was terminated. Erlotinib exposure (average C_max 2308 ± 698 ng/ml and AUC _0–24 41,030 ± 15,577 ng × h/ml) approximated previous reports in the six patients with pharmacokinetic analysis. However, erlotinib C_max and AUC_0–24 decreased significantly by 93% (p = 0.02) and 97% (p < 0.01), respectively, during dovitinib co-administration.ConclusionsThis small study demonstrated considerable toxicity and a significant pharmacokinetic interaction with a marked decrease in erlotinib exposure in the presence of dovitinib, likely mediated through CYP1A1/1A2 induction. Given the toxicity and the pharmacokinetic interaction, further investigation with this drug combination will not be pursued.     

The combination of a chemotherapy doublet (gemcitabine and capecitabine) with a biological doublet (bevacizumab and erlotinib) in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The results of a phase I/II study

BackgroundPreclinical data support the combined inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathways in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Following a dose finding phase I study the efficacy and toxicity of a four-drug regimen utilising the cytotoxic doublet of gemcitabine and capecitabine (GemCap), with the biological doublet of erlotinib and bevacizumab were further assessed in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.Patients and methodsIn a phase II expansion cohort, patients with chemonaive locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer received gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² D1, 8, 15), capecitabine (1400 mg/m² D1–21), erlotinib (100 mg daily) and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg D1, 15) every 28 days. The primary endpoint was radiological response rate by response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST). Computed tomography (CT) assessment was performed every 8 weeks. Consolidation radiotherapy was considered in locally advanced patients following six cycles of treatment.ResultsIn total 44 patients (phases I & II) were recruited. The median cycles delivered were 6 (range 1–16). Confirmed radiological responses were seen in 23% (95% confidence interval (CI): 11–38%) of patients. The median progression-free and overall survival for the entire cohort was 8.4 and 12.6 months, respectively. In patients with metastatic disease the median overall survival was 10.1 months. Common grade 3/4 toxicities were; neutropenia 52%, lethargy 32%, diarrhoea 18% and hand-foot syndrome 18%.ConclusionThe combination of gemcitabine, capecitabine, erlotinib and bevacizumab was feasible with a manageable toxicity profile and demonstrated encouraging efficacy data in a good performance status population.     

A phase I dose escalation study of oral c-MET inhibitor tivantinib (ARQ 197) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors

BackgroundTivantinib (ARQ 197) is an orally available, non-adenosine triphosphate competitive, selective c-MET inhibitor. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability and to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of tivantinib and gemcitabine combination.Patients and methodsPatients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors were treated with escalating doses of tivantinib (120–360 mg capsules) in combination with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² weekly for 3 of 4 weeks). Different schedules of administration were tested and modified based on emerging preclinical data. Tivantinib was given continuously, twice a day (b.i.d.) for 2, 3 or 4 weeks of a 28-day cycle or on a 5-day on, 2-day off schedule (the day before and day of gemcitabine administration).ResultsTwenty-nine patients were treated with gemcitabine and escalating doses of tivantinib: 120 mg b.i.d. (n = 4), 240 mg b.i.d. (n = 6) and 360 mg b.i.d. (n = 19). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in escalation. The RP2D was 360 mg b.i.d. daily, and 45 additional patients were enrolled in the expansion cohort. Grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities were observed in 54 of 74 (73%) patients with the most common being neutropenia (43%), anemia (30%), thrombocytopenia (28%) and fatigue (15%). There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenia. Administration of gemcitabine did not affect tivantinib concentration. Fifty-six patients were assessable for response. Eleven (20%) patients achieved a partial response and 26 (46%) had stable disease (SD), including 15 (27%) who achieved SD for over 4 months. Ten of 37 patients with clinical benefit had prior exposure to gemcitabine.ConclusionThe combination of tivantinib at its monotherapy dose and standard dose gemcitabine was safe and tolerable. Early signs of antitumor activity may warrant further development of this combination in nonsmall-cell lung cancer, ovarian, pancreatic and cholangiocarcinoma.ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT00874042.     

Randomized phase II study of two intercalated combinations of eribulin mesylate and erlotinib in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundThis phase II, open-label study investigated intercalated combinations of eribulin and erlotinib in unselected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapies.Patients and methodsEligible patients were randomized to eribulin mesylate 2.0 mg/m² on day 1 with erlotinib 150 mg on days 2–16 (21-day regimen) or eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 with erlotinib 150 mg on days 15–28 (28-day regimen). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR).ResultsOne hundred and twenty-three patients received ≥1 cycle of therapy (63, 21-day regimen; 60, 28-day regimen). ORRs were 13% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6%–24%] and 17% (95% CI 8%–29%), and disease control rates were 48% (95% CI 35%–61%) and 63% (95% CI 50%–75%) for the 21- and 28-day regimens, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were similar with both regimens. Both regimens were well tolerated with common grade ≥3 toxicities being neutropenia, asthenia/fatigue, and dyspnoea. Sequential administration of erlotinib did not interfere with the pharmacokinetic profile of eribulin.ConclusionIntercalated combination of eribulin and erlotinib demonstrated modest activity and the addition of erlotinib did not appear to improve treatment outcome in an unselected population. The 28-day regimen is suitable for further investigation.Clinicaltrials.gov identifierNCT01104155.