Prevention of dentine erosion by brushing with anti-erosive toothpastes

Objective

This in vitro study aimed to investigate the preventive effect of brushing with anti-erosive toothpastes compared to a conventional fluoride toothpaste on dentine erosion.

Materials and methods

Bovine dentine specimens (n = 12 per subgroup) were eroded in an artificial mouth (6 days, 6 × 30 s/day) using either citric acid (pH:2.5) or a hydrochloric acid/pepsin solution (pH:1.6), simulating extrinsic or intrinsic erosive conditions, respectively. In between, the specimens were rinsed with artificial saliva. Twice daily, the specimens were brushed for 15 s in an automatic brushing machine at 2.5 N with a conventional fluoride toothpaste slurry (elmex, AmF) or toothpaste slurries with anti-erosive formulations: Apacare (NaF/1% nHAP), Biorepair (ZnCO₃-HAP), Chitodent (Chitosan), elmex Erosionsschutz (NaF/AmF/SnCl₂/Chitosan), mirasensitive hap (NaF/30% HAP), Sensodyne Proschmelz (NaF/KNO₃). Unbrushed specimens served as control. Dentine loss was measured profilometrically and statistically analysed using two-way and one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffe‘s post hoc tests. RDA-values of all toothpastes were determined, and linear mixed models were applied to analyse the influence of toothpaste abrasivity on dentine wear (p < 0.05).

Results

Dentine erosion of unbrushed specimens amounted to 5.1 ± 1.0 μm (extrinsic conditions) and 12.9 ± 1.4 μm (intrinsic conditions). All toothpastes significantly reduced dentine erosion by 24–67% (extrinsic conditions) and 21–40% (intrinsic conditions). Biorepair was least effective, while all other toothpastes were not significantly different from each other. Linear mixed models did not show a significant effect of the RDA-value of the respective toothpaste on dentine loss.

Conclusion

Toothpastes with anti-erosive formulations reduced dentine erosion, especially under simulated extrinsic erosive conditions, but were not superior to a conventional fluoride toothpaste.     

Effect of sodium,amine and stannous fluoride at the same concentration and different pH on in vitro erosion

Objective

This study aimed to compare the effects 0.5% and 1% sodium, amine and stannous fluoride at different pH on enamel erosion in vitro.

Methods

Bovine enamel samples were submitted to a cyclic de- and remineralisation for 3 days. Each day, the samples were exposed for 120 min to pooled human saliva and subsequently treated with one of the fluoride solutions for 3 min: amine fluoride (AmF, 0.5% and 1% F⁻), sodium fluoride (NaF, 0.5% and 1% F⁻), each at pH 3.9 and 7.0, and stannous fluoride (SnF₂, 0.5% and 1% F⁻), at pH: 3.9. Additionally, two groups were treated with fluoride-free placebo solutions (pH: 3.9 and 7.0) and one group served as control (no fluoridation). Ten specimens each group were inserted in a so-called artificial mouth and eroded six times daily with hydrochloric acid (pH 2.6) for 90 s each intermitted by exposure to artificial saliva (1 h). After 3 days, enamel loss was analyzed profilometrically and evaluated statistically by ANOVA.

Results

Only the acidic 0.5% and 1% SnF₂ and 1% AmF solutions were able to reduce erosive enamel loss significantly, while all other solutions and placebos did not differ significantly from the control. Between the acidic SnF₂ and the 1% AmF solutions no significant differences could be detected.

Conclusion

At the same concentrations, acidic SnF₂ and AmF may be more effective than NaF to protect enamel against erosion.     

Randomised in situ trial on the effect of milk and CPP-ACP on dental erosion

Objectives

This randomised in situ study aimed to analyse the effect of milk (with or without 5 ppm F) and CPP-ACP pastes (with or without 900 ppm F) on dental erosion.

Methods

The study was a seven phase (5 days each) crossover design involving 15 participants wearing intraoral appliances with enamel and dentine specimens. Specimens were extraorally eroded (erosive soft drink, 6 × 90 s/day) and brushed (2 × 30 s/day, 2 N) using a non-fluoridated toothpaste (negative control). The test products were milk, milk + 5 ppm F (twice daily, each 100 ml/2 min), CPP-ACP paste, CPP-ACP paste + 900 ppm F (3 min/day) or a SnCl₂/AmF/NaF mouthrinse (positive control, 30 s/day), which were applied immediately after erosion with the appliances in the oral cavity. In an additional group, a fluoridated toothpaste was used without any additional test product. Tissue loss was determined profilometrically after 5 days and statistically analysed by linear mixed models methodologies (p < 0.05).

Results

Compared with the negative control (non-fluoridated toothpaste only, enamel: 2.2 ± 1.3 μm; dentine: 3.8 ± 2.2 μm), enamel and dentine loss was significantly reduced by the use of fluoridated toothpaste (enamel: 1.1 ± 1.0 μm; dentine: 2.4 ± 1.7 μm) and the SnCl₂/AmF/NaF mouthrinse (1.5 ± 1.5 μm; dentine: 1.8 ± 1.9 μm).

Conclusions

Milk and CPP-ACP were not effective in reducing enamel and dentine loss significantly, independently of the presence of fluoride.

Clinical significance

Enamel and dentine erosion were significantly reduced by the use of a fluoridated toothpaste or a SnCl₂/AmF/NaF mouthrinse, but not by milk or CPP-ACP under the conditions of the present study.

Clinical trials registration

NCT01566357.     

Effect of experimental mouthrinses containing the combination of NaF and TiF4 on enamel erosive wear in vitro

Objective

This study analysed the anti-erosive effect of experimental solutions containing TiF₄ and NaF.

Methods

Bovine enamel samples (n = 15) were treated with: (1) commercial solution with SnCl₂/NaF (Erosion Protection^®); (2) experimental solution with 0.0815% TiF₄; (3) 0.105% NaF; (4) 0.042% NaF + 0.049% TiF₄; (5) 0.063% NaF + 0.036% TiF₄ or (6) control. The samples were submitted to pH cycles and daily fluoride applications for seven days. The enamel wear was measured using a contact profilometer and analysed by ANOVA (p < 0.05).

Results

The best anti-erosive effect was found for experimental solution with 0.0815% TiF₄ (99% reduction in enamel wear), followed by SnCl₂/NaF (78%) and 0.049% TiF₄ + 0.042% NaF solution (41%).

Conclusions

The experimental solution containing a specific combination of TiF₄ + NaF has the ability to partially reduce enamel erosion.     

A qualitative and quantitative investigation into the effect of fluoride formulations on enamel erosion and erosion-abrasion in vitro

Objectives

To investigate the effect of a single application of highly concentrated SnF₂ and NaF solutions and a NaF/CaF₂ varnish on human enamel subjected to hydrochloric acid erosion and tooth brush abrasion.

Methods

Forty enamel samples were prepared from human third molars and NaF (9500 ppm, pH 8.0), SnF₂ (9500 ppm, pH 2.6) solutions; Bifluorid10^® varnish (42,500 ppm, NaF 5%, CaF₂ 5%) and deionized water (control) was applied to the enamel. Following this three, six and nine cycles of erosion [1 cycle = erosion (0.01 M HCl, pH 2.2, 2 min) + artificial saliva (1 h, pH 7.0)] and erosion-abrasion [1 cycle = erosion (0.01 M HCl, pH 2.2, 2 min) + artificial saliva (1 h, pH 7.0) + abrasion (120 linear strokes in artificial saliva from Tepe medium soft brushes 200 g loading)] were carried out. The fluoride treated enamel was analysed using Knoop microhardness, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).

Results

For erosion alone, there was significantly less microhardness reduction in the Bifluorid10^® group after three and six cycles of erosion (P < 0.05), however no other groups showed statistically different hardness (P > 0.05). The EDS analysis showed that only the Bifluorid10^® group had any detectable fluorine following erosion and erosion-abrasion (0.1 wt.% and 0.2 wt.% fluorine respectively). The surface fluorine was found to have been removed after erosion and erosion-abrasion for all other surface treatments. Although precipitates were observed after application of the surface treatments, following erosion-abrasion, no visible surface effects from any fluoride preparation remained.

Conclusions

Enamel surface precipitates from application NaF, SnF₂ solutions appear to not be able to provide protection against gastric erosion and tooth brush abrasion. The NaF/CaF₂ varnish provided limited protection against erosion but the role for such varnishes in gastric erosion and tooth brush abrasion remains uncertain.     

Protective effect of experimental mouthrinses containing NaF and TiF4 on dentin erosive loss in vitro

Objective

This in vitro study assessed the anti-erosive effect of experimental mouthrinses containing TiF₄ and NaF on dentin erosive loss.

Material and Methods

Bovine dentin specimens were randomly allocated into the groups (n=15): 1) SnCl₂/NaF/AmF (Erosion Protection^®/GABA, pH 4.5, positive control); 2) experimental solution with 0.0815% TiF₄ (pH 2.5); 3) 0.105% NaF (pH 4.5); 4) 0.042% NaF+0.049% TiF₄ (pH 4.4); 5) 0.063% NaF+0.036% TiF₄ (pH 4.5); 6) no treatment (negative control). Each specimen was cyclically demineralized (Sprite Zero, pH 2.6, 4x90 s/day) and exposed to artificial saliva between the erosive challenges for 7 days. The treatment with the fluoride solutions was done 2x60 s/day, immediately after the first and the last erosive challenges of the day. Dentin erosive loss was measured by profilometry (μm). The data were analyzed using Kruskal Wallis/Dunn tests (p<0.05).

Results

Mouthrinses containing TiF₄ or Sn/F were able to show some protective effect against dentin erosive loss compared to negative control. The best anti-erosive effect was found for experimental solution containing 0.0815% TiF₄ (100% reduction in dentin loss), followed by 0.042% NaF+0.049% TiF⁴ (58.3%), SnCl₂/NaF/AmF (52%) and 0.063% NaF+0.036% TiF₄ (40%). NaF solution (13.3%) did not significantly differ from control.

Conclusion

The daily application of experimental mouthrinse containing TiF₄ and NaF has the ability to reduce dentin erosion, as well as Erosion Protection^® and TiF₄ alone.     

Anti‐erosive effects of fluoride and phytosphingosine: an in vitro study

A selection of commercially available products containing stannous fluoride (SnF₂)/sodium fluoride (NaF), SnF₂/amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP), SnF₂/NaF/ACP, tin (Sn)/fluorine (F)/chitosan were compared with phytosphingosine (PHS) with respect to their anti‐erosive properties in vitro. One‐hundred and twenty bovine enamel specimens were immersed in the respective product slurries for 2 min, twice daily. The formulations were diluted with either remineralization solution or artificial saliva. After each treatment, an erosive challenge was performed for 10 min, twice daily, using citric acid, pH 3.4. The specimens were stored in remineralization solution or artificial saliva until the next treatment‐erosion challenge. After 10 d, tissue loss was determined using profilometry. Enamel softening was determined through surface microhardness measurements. Tissue‐loss values (measured in μm and expressed as mean ± SD) for PHS, SnF₂/NaF, SnF₂/ACP, SnF₂/ACP/NaF, and Sn/F/chitosan treatment groups and for the negative‐control group, were, respectively, 35.6 ± 2.8, 15.8 ± 1.8, 22.1 ± 2.0, 22.9 ± 1.8, 16.2 ± 1.2, and 51.2 ± 4.4 in the presence of remineralization solution and 31.7 ± 3.3, 15.6 ± 2.9, 16.5 ± 2.7, 16.8 ± 2.1, 13.1 ± 3.0, and 50.7 ± 2.8 in the presence of artificial saliva. There were no significant differences in surface microhardness measurements between the treatment groups. In conclusion, PHS resulted in a significant reduction of tissue loss compared with the negative control, but in comparison, the toothpastes containing Sn²⁺ and F^? ions were significantly more effective compared with PHS.     

Effect of chitosan solutions with or without fluoride on the protection against dentin erosion in vitro

The aim of this study was to assess the protective effect of experimental solutions containing chitosan at different viscosities with or without fluoride (TiF₄/NaF) on dentin loss in vitro. Bovine dentin samples (n = 15) were prepared and allocated to one of the following treatments: (i) 0.5% chitosan (500 mPas); (ii) 0.5% chitosan (2,000 mPas); (iii) 0.042% NaF and 0.049% TiF₄; (iv) as (iii) with addition of 0.5% chitosan (500 mPas); (v) as (iii) with addition of 0.5% chitosan (2,000 mPas); (vi) commercial solution with SnCl₂/AmF/NaF (positive control); or (vii) deionized water (negative control). The samples were submitted to pH cycling for 7 d (0.1% citric acid, 4 × 90 s d⁻¹). The treatment was applied once a day for 30 s. The dentin loss was quantified using a contact profilometer. Three samples per group were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy. The dentin loss (μm) was submitted to anova and Tukey's test for differences between treatments. Among the treatments tested, only chitosan 500 mPas was able to statistically significantly reduce the dentin loss compared to the negative control, being similar to the positive control. TiF₄/NaF, whether with or without chitosan, had no protective effect. Chitosan 500 mPas and SnCl₂/AmF/NaF solutions have comparable protective effect against dentin erosion in vitro.     

Impact of two toothpastes on repairing enamel erosion produced by a soft drink: An AFM in vitro study

Objectives

The aim of the present in vitro study was the evaluation of two toothpastes (Sensodyne Pronamel and Biorepair Plus on repairing enamel erosion produced by a soft drink (Coca Cola), using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM).

Methods

Fifty extracted human central incisors free of caries were selected and divided in a treatment and a control half; they were kept in artificial saliva during whole experimentation. The treatment halves were divided into five groups; group 1: demineralization with soft drink; group 2: demineralization with soft drink + Pronamel; group 3: demineralization with soft drink + Biorepair Plus; group 4: intact enamel + Pronamel; group 5: intact enamel + Biorepair Plus. Specimen demineralization was carried on in 4 intervals of 2 min. In groups 2, 3, 4, and 5 the toothpastes were applied for 3 min at 0, 8, 24 and 36 h. The surface of each specimen was imaged by AFM and R_rms, root-mean-square roughness, and Maximum Depth of the cavities were registered.

Results

Amongst treatment specimens of groups 1, 2, and 3 a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01) in R_rms and Maximum Depth values was registered: the toothpastes reduced enamel demineralization. No statistical differences in R_rms values were registered between the two toothpastes.

Conclusions

The toothpastes tested (Pronamel and BioRepair Plus) offer a degree of protection from erosive drinks.     

Effect of a single application of TiF4 and NaF varnishes and solutions on dentin erosion in vitro

Objectives

This in vitro study aimed to analyse the effect of a single application of TiF₄ and NaF varnishes and solutions to protect against dentin erosion.

Methods

Bovine root dentin samples were pre-treated with NaF-Duraphat varnish (2.26%F, pH 4.5), NaF/CaF₂-Duofluorid varnish (5.63%F, pH 8.0), NaF-experimental varnish (2.45%F, pH 4.5), TiF₄-experimental varnish (2.45%F, pH 1.2), NaF solution (2.26%F, pH 4.5), TiF₄ solution (2.45%F, pH 1.2) and placebo varnish (pH 5.0, no-F varnish control). Controls remained untreated. Ten samples in each group were then subjected to an erosive demineralisation (Sprite Zero, 4× 90 s/day) and remineralisation (artificial saliva, between the erosive cycles) cycling for 5 days. Dentin loss was measured profilometrically after pre-treatment and after 1, 3 and 5 days of de-remineralisation cycling. The data were statistically analysed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni's post hoc test (p < 0.05).

Results

After pre-treatment, TiF₄ solution significantly induced surface loss (1.08 ± 0.53 μm). Only Duraphat reduced the dentin loss overtime, but it did not significantly differ from placebo varnish (at 3rd and 5th days) and TiF₄ varnish (at 3rd day).

Conclusions

Duraphat varnish seems to be the best option to partially reduce dentin erosion. However, the maintenance of the effects of this treatment after successive erosive challenges is limited.     

The effect of saliva substitutes on enamel erosion in vitro

Objectives

To investigate the effect of saliva substitutes on enamel erosion in vitro.

Methods

A total of 204 bovine enamel samples were embedded in acrylic resin and allocated to 17 groups (n = 12). The specimens were eroded in an artificial mouth (3 days; 6 × 30 s/days, flow rate: 2 ml/min) using citric acid (pH: 2.5). Immediately after the erosive attacks, saliva substitutes (12 sprays, 3 gels) were applied. Between the erosive cycles the specimens were rinsed with artificial saliva (flowrate: 0.5 ml/min). A SnCl₂/AmF/NaF-containing mouthrinse was used as positive control, water spray served as negative control. Enamel loss was measured profilometrically and the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffé’s post hoc tests (p < 0.05).

Results

Four saliva substitutes increased enamel erosion, probably due to the low pH or the content of citric acid. Several saliva substitutes were able to reduce enamel erosion significantly by 60–90% (in the range of the positive control). The protective potential of these products was in the range of the positive control (reduction of enamel loss to 30% of negative control). The erosion-protective potential of these high-viscous products is probably related to their film-forming properties, leading to a mechanical protection of the surface.

Conclusion

Saliva substitutes containing a very low pH exhibit a distinct erosive potential, while most high-viscous products present an erosion-protective effect. It can be recommended that patients suffering from xerostomia and at high risk for dental erosion should use high-viscous saliva substitutes, but should avoid saliva substitutes with low pH or containing citric acid.

Clinical significance

It can be recommended that patients suffering from xerostomia and at high risk for dental erosion should use high-viscous saliva substitutes, but should avoid saliva substitutes with low pH or containing citric acid.     

Effect of a chitosan additive to a Sn2+-containing toothpaste on its anti-erosive/anti-abrasive efficacy—a controlled randomised in situ trial

Objectives

It is well known that Sn²⁺ is a notable anti-erosive agent. There are indications that biopolymers such as chitosan can enhance the effect of Sn²⁺, at least in vitro. However, little information exists about their anti-erosive/anti-abrasive in situ effects. In the present in situ study, the efficacy of Sn²⁺-containing toothpastes in the presence or absence of chitosan was tested.

Methods

Ten subjects participated in the randomised crossover study, wearing mandibular appliances with human enamel specimens. Specimens were extraorally demineralised (7 days, 0.5 % citric acid, pH?2.6; 6?×?2 min/day) and intraorally exposed to toothpaste suspensions (2?×?2 min/day). Within the suspension immersion time, one half of the specimens were additionally brushed intraorally with a powered toothbrush (5 s, 2.5 N). Tested preparations were a placebo toothpaste (negative control), two experimental toothpastes (F/Sn = 1,400 ppm?F^?, 3,500 ppm Sn²⁺; F/Sn/chitosan = 1,400 ppm?F^?, 3,500 ppm Sn²⁺, 0.5 % chitosan) and an SnF₂-containing gel (positive control, GelKam = 3,000 ppm Sn²⁺, 1,000 ppm?F^?). Substance loss was quantified profilometrically (μm).

Results

In the placebo group, tissue loss was 11.2?±?4.6 (immersion in suspension) and 17.7?±?4.7 (immersion in suspension?+?brushing). Immersion in each Sn²⁺-containing suspension significantly reduced tissue loss (p?≤?0.01); after immersion in suspension?+?brushing, only the treatments with GelKam (5.4?±?5.5) and with F/Sn/chitosan (9.6?±?5.6) significantly reduced loss [both p?≤?0.05 compared to placebo; F/Sn 12.8?±?6.4 (not significant)]

Conclusion

Chitosan enhanced the efficacy of the Sn²⁺-containing toothpaste as an anti-erosive/anti-abrasive agent.

Clinical relevance

The use of Sn²⁺- and chitosan-containing toothpaste is a good option for symptomatic therapy in patients with regular acid impacts.     

Caries-preventive effect of anti-erosive and nano-hydroxyapatite-containing toothpastes in vitro

Objectives

The aim of the study was to investigate the caries-preventive effect of newly developed fluoride and fluoride-free toothpastes specially designed for erosion prevention. The hypothesis was that these products might also show superior caries-inhibiting effect than regular fluoride toothpastes, since they were designed for stronger erosive acid challenges.

Materials and methods

Enamel specimens were obtained from bovine teeth and pre-demineralized (pH = 4.95/21 days) to create artificial caries lesions. Baseline mineral loss (ΔZ_B) and lesion depth (LD_B) were determined using transversal microradiography (TMR). Ninety specimens with a median ΔZ_B (SD) of 6027 ± 1546 vol% × μm were selected and randomly allocated to five groups (n = 18). Treatments during pH-cycling (14 days, 4 × 60 min demineralization/day) were brushing 2×/day with AmF (1400 ppm F⁻, anti-caries [AC]); AmF/NaF/SnCl₂/Chitosan (700 ppm F⁻/700 ppm F⁻/3500 ppm Sn²⁺, anti-erosion [AE1]); NaF/KNO₃ (1400 ppm F⁻, anti-erosion [AE2]); nano-hydroxyapatite-containing (0 ppm F⁻, [nHA]); and fluoride-free toothpastes (0 ppm F⁻, negative control [NC]). Toothpaste slurries were prepared with mineral salt solution (1:3 wt/wt). After pH-cycling specimens presenting lesion, surface loss (mainly by NC and nHA) were discarded. For the remaining 77 specimens, new TMR analyses (ΔZ_E/LD_E) were performed. Changes in mineral loss (ΔΔZ = ΔZ_B − ΔZ_E) and lesion depth (ΔLD = LD_B − LD_E) were calculated.

Results

All toothpastes caused significantly less demineralization (lower ΔΔZ) than NC (p < 0.05, ANOVA) except for nHA. The fluoride toothpastes did not differ significantly regarding ΔΔZ and ΔLD (p > 0.05, ANOVA).

Conclusion/clinical relevance

While both anti-erosive and anti-caries toothpastes reduced mineral loss to a similar extent, the fluoride-free nano-hydroxyapatite-containing toothpaste seemed not to be suitable for inhibition of caries demineralization in vitro.

     

Does tin pre-treatment enhance the bond strength of adhesive systems to enamel?

Objectives

The study investigated the modification of composite-to-enamel bond strength by pre-treatment of enamel with a concentrated, acidic SnCl₂-solution.

Methods

Six groups of flat human enamel specimens (n = 44 per group) were treated as follows: OB-H: H₃PO₄ etching, Optibond FL application (primer + adhesive; manufacturer's instructions); OB-S: SnCl₂ pre-treatment, Optibond FL application (primer + adhesive); OB-HS: H₃PO₄ etching + SnCl₂ pre-treatment, Optibond FL application (primer + adhesive); CF-N: Clearfil SE application (primer + bond; manufacturer's instructions); CF-H: H₃PO₄ etching, Clearfil SE application (primer + bond); CF-S: SnCl₂ pre-treatment, Clearfil SE application (primer + bond). Enamel specimens were then built up with resin composite (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic) and stored (100% humidity, 37 °C, 1 week). μTBS-measurement and failure mode analysis of one-half of the specimens were performed immediately after storage, while the other half was analysed after a thermocycling procedure (8500 cycles; 5 °C and 55 °C; dwell time 30 s). Additional specimens were prepared for SEM- and EDX-analysis.

Results

Highest values were measured for OB-H before and after thermocycling, lowest values for CF-N. Compared to OB-H treatment, OB-S treatment reduced μTBS before/after thermocycling by 23%/28% and OB-HS treatment by 8%/24% (except for OB-SH before (n.s.), all p ≤ 0.001 compared to OB-H). In the Clearfil SE treated groups pre-treatment increased μTBS significantly compared to CF-N (before/after: CF-H: +46%/+70%; CF-S: +51%/42%; all p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion

Pre-treatment with H₃PO₄ or SnCl₂ markedly increased the μTBS of Clearfil SE to enamel. However, thermocycling partly reduced the gain in μTBS obtained by SnCl₂ pre-treatment.

Clinical significance

The application of an acidic and highly concentrated SnCl₂ solution is a good option to increase the μTBS between enamel and a resin composite mediated by an adhesive system containing the multifunctional monomer MDP.     

Inhibition of tooth erosion by milk containing different fluoride concentrations: An in vitro study

Objectives

This in vitro study assessed the effect of milk containing different fluoride concentrations on tooth erosion.

Methods

Bovine enamel and root dentine specimens were treated with: (1) bovine whole milk with 0 ppm F; (2) 2.5 ppm F; (3) 5 ppm F; (4) 10 ppm F (all after erosion); (5) whole milk with 0 ppm F (before erosion); (6) NaF (0.05% F, positive control, after erosion) or (7) 0.9% NaCl (negative control, after erosion). The specimens were submitted to pH cycles (4× 90 s in soft drink) and treatments for 5 days. The specimens were immersed in the treatment solutions for 1 min (only at the first cycle each day) with further exposition to 1:1 milk:saliva slurry for 10 min. The tooth loss was measured using a contact profilometer and statistically analysed (p < 0.05).

Results

Rinsing with milk before erosive challenge significantly reduced tooth loss compared to negative control (67% and 24% reduction in dentine and enamel loss, respectively) and to milk after erosive challenge, only for dentine. The addition of fluoride to milk also reduced tooth loss compared to negative control, but with no significant differences among fluoride concentrations for enamel and dentine (μm), respectively: 0 ppm (3.63 ± 0.04 and 2.51 ± 0.53), 2.5 ppm F (2.86 ± 0.42 and 1.96 ± 0.47), 5 ppm F (2.81 ± 0.27 and 1.77 ± 0.44), 10 ppm F (2.03 ± 0.49 and 1.68 ± 0.59). There was a negative and significant correlation between [F] and the tooth loss.

Conclusions

Daily rinse with milk containing F is able to reduce both enamel and dentine erosion in vitro.

Clinical significance

Since the prevalence of dental erosion is steadily increasing, rinse with milk or its derivate might be an important strategy to reduce the progression of tooth erosion.     

Effects of dentifrices differing in fluoride compounds on artificial enamel caries lesions in vitro

The aim of this study was to compare the caries-preventive effect of a stabilized stannous fluoride/sodium fluoride dentifrice containing sodium hexametaphosphate with those of a regular, solely sodium fluoride-containing and amine fluoride-containing dentifrice on pre-demineralized bovine enamel specimens using a pH-cycling model. Bovine enamel specimens with two artificial lesions each were prepared. Baseline mineral loss of both lesions was analyzed using transversal microradiography (TMR). Eighty-five specimens with a mean (SD) baseline mineral loss of 3393 (683) vol% × µm were selected and randomly allocated to five groups (n = 13/15). Treatments during pH-cycling (28 days and 2 × 20 min demineralization/day) were: brushing twice daily with slurries of AmF (1400 ppm F^?), NaF (1450 ppm F^?), SnF₂/NaF (1100 ppm F^?/350 ppm F^?), and fluoride-free (FF) dentifrices or they were immersed in distilled water and remained unbrushed (NB). Subsequently, from each specimen one lesion was covered with acid-resistant varnish, while the remaining lesion was demineralized for another 14 days. Differences in integrated mineral loss (??Z) were calculated between values before and after pH-cycling (??Z _E1) as well as before pH-cycling and after second demineralization (??Z _E2) using TMR. Treatments AmF and NaF induced a significantly higher mineral gain (??Z _E1/??Z _E2) compared to treatments FF and NB (p < 0.05; ANOVA test). Except for treatments AmF and NaF no significant differences in mineral loss between before and after pH-cycling could be observed (p < 0.05; t test) [??Z _E1: AmF:1563 (767); NaF:1222 (1246); SnF₂/NaF:258 (1259); FF:?52 (1223); NB:?151 (834)]. Both dentifrices with either AmF or NaF promoted remineralization, whereas SnF₂/NaF dentifrice did not promote remineralization in a biofilm-free pH-cycling model.     

Erosion-inhibiting potential of a stannous chloride-containing fluoride solution under acid flow conditions in vitro

Objectives

This study aimed to analyse the erosion-inhibiting potential of a single application of stannous chloride-containing fluoride solution on pellicle-covered enamel and dentine under constant acid flow conditions in vitro.

Design

Bovine enamel (n = 60) and dentine (n = 60) samples were exposed 1 h to the oral cavity of 4 healthy volunteers to allow for in situ pellicle formation. Pellicle-covered samples were randomly assigned to three groups (each n = 20 enamel and n = 20 dentine samples; 5 enamel and 5 dentine samples/volunteer) and treated once with a SnCl2/AmF/NaF (800 ppm Sn(II), 500 ppm F, pH 4.5) or a NaF solution (500 ppm F, pH 4.5) for 2 min or remained untreated (controls). Samples were eroded with hydrochloric acid (pH 2.6) in a small erosion chamber at 60 μl/min for 25 min. Calcium release into the acid was monitored in consecutive 30 s intervals for 5 min, then at 1 min intervals up to a total erosion time of 25 min using the Arsenazo III procedure. Data were statistically analysed by random-effects linear models (p < 0.05).

Results

The stannous chloride-containing fluoride solution reduced calcium loss of enamel and dentine to up to 6 min and 3.5 min, respectively. Calcium loss (% of control) amounted from 24 ± 7 (30 s) up to 93 ± 14 (6 min) in enamel and from 38 ± 13 (30 s) to 87 ± 15 (3.5 min) in dentine. The sodium fluoride solution was unable to reduce enamel and dentine erosion at any time point.

Conclusion

A single application of a stannous chloride-containing fluoride solution reduced enamel and dentine erosion up to 6 min and 3.5 min of constant acid flow, respectively.     

The effect of increasing sodium fluoride concentrations on erosion and attrition of enamel and dentine in vitro

Objectives

To investigate the effect of an aqueous sodium fluoride solution of increasing concentration on erosion and attrition of enamel and dentine in vitro.

Methods

Enamel and dentine sections from caries-free human third molars were polished flat and taped (exposing a 3 mm × 3 mm area) before being randomly allocated to 1 of 5 groups per substrate (n = 10/gp): G1 (distilled water control); G2 (225 ppm NaF); G3 (1450 ppm NaF); G4 (5000 ppm NaF); G5 (19,000 ppm NaF). All specimens were subjected to 5, 10 and 15 cycles of experimental wear [1 cycle = artificial saliva (2 h, pH 7.0) + erosion (0.3% citric acid, pH 3.2, 5 min) + fluoride/control (5 min) + attrition (60 linear strokes in artificial saliva from enamel antagonists loaded to 300 g)]. Following tape removal, step height (SH) in μm was measured using optical profilometry.

Results

When the number of cycles increased the amount of tooth surface loss increased significantly in enamel and dentine after attrition and erosion and for dentine after attrition. Attrition and erosion resulted in greater surface loss than attrition alone after 15 cycles of experimental wear of enamel. 5000 ppm and 19,000 ppm sodium fluoride solutions had a protective effect on erosive and attritional enamel tooth wear in vitro, however no other groups showed significant differences.

Conclusions

The more intensive the fluoride regime the more protection was afforded to enamel from attrition and erosion. However, in this study no such protective effect was demonstrated for dentine.     

Retention of KOH-soluble fluoride formed after application of a SnCl2/AmF/NaF containing mouth rinse under erosive conditions

Abstract

Objective. Application of SnCl₂/AmF/NaF containing mouth rinse showed good protection against erosion. The aim of the study was to evaluate if this is due to the amount of KOH-soluble fluoride (KOHsF) formed or its resistance under erosive conditions. Methods. One hundred and fifty bovine enamel samples were allocated to five groups (n = 30) and were once eroded in 0.05 mol/l citric acid (5 min). Samples were stored in artificial saliva for 4 days. Samples of two groups (erosive-SnCl₂ + erosive-NaF) were eroded 6 × for 5 min. The remaining samples were stored in aqua dest deionised water. Each day the samples were treated twice for 2 min with 1 ml SnCl₂/AmF/NaF-solution (erosive-SnCl₂;neutral-SnCl₂/AmF/NaF) or NaF-solution (erosive-NaF;neutral-NaF). The fifth group remained untreated (control). On day 5, 10 samples of each group were used for determination of KOHsF (series 1). The remaining samples were again eroded (erosive-SnCl₂ + erosive-NaF) or stored in artificial saliva (neutral-SnCl₂ + neutral-NaF). KOHsF of another 10 samples of each group was measured (series 2). The last 10 samples of each group were also treated as described above and the amount of KOHsF was measured (series 3). Results. In each series 1–3 KOHsF in group erosive-SnCl₂/AmF/NaF were significantly higher. No significant loss of KOHsF between the series 1–3 was observed (except for control). Conclusion. SnCl₂/AmF/NaF containing mouth rinse revealed a better formation of KOH-soluble fluoride as the NaF-solution, although the applied fluoride compound has no influence on the stability of the KOHsF under erosive conditions, leading to the conclusion that the resistance of KOHsF is not responsible for the difference in the protection against dental erosion.     

Effect of TiF4, ZrF4, HfF4 and AmF on erosion and erosion/abrasion of enamel and dentin in situ

Objective

This in situ study aimed to analyse the impact of different tetrafluorides (TiF₄, ZrF₄ and HfF₄) and AmF on erosion and erosion plus abrasion of enamel and dentin.

Design

Ten volunteers took part in this crossover and double-blind study performed in 8 phases of each 3 days. In each phase, 2 bovine enamel and 2 dentin specimens were fixed in intraoral appliances. One enamel and one dentin sample were pretreated once with TiF₄, ZrF₄, HfF₄ or AmF (all 0.5 M F) for 60 s, while the other samples remained unfluoridated and served as control. Then, all samples were subjected to either erosion only (4 times/day, 90 s) or to erosion and abrasion (2 times/day, 30 s/sample). Toothbrushing abrasion was performed 90 min after the first and last erosion with an electrical toothbrush and fluoridated toothpaste at 1.2 N. After 3 days, enamel and dentin loss was assessed by profilometry (μm) and analysed by repeated measures ANOVA and paired t-test (p < 0.05).

Results

All fluoride solutions reduced enamel and dentin loss significantly compared to the controls. Generally, eroded samples showed less wear than eroded and abraded samples. The protective potential of the fluorides was not significantly different and was only slightly, but mostly not significantly, decreased by abrasion. The protective effect of the fluoride solutions was similar in enamel and dentin.

Conclusion

Tetrafluorides and AmF are able to reduce erosion and erosion plus abrasion in situ and are almost equally effective.