Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of febuxostat, a new non-purine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase in subjects with renal impairment

To assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of febuxostat in subjects with normal renal function or renal impairment, febuxostat (80 mg/d) was orally administered for 7 days to subjects with normal renal function (n = 11, CLcr >80 mL/min/1.73 m) or to subjects with mild (n = 6, CLcr 50-80 mL/min/1.73 m), moderate (n = 7, CLcr 30-49 mL/min/1.73 m), or severe renal impairment (n = 7, CLcr 10-29 mL/min/1.73 m). The pharmacokinetics of febuxostat and its active quantifiable metabolites 67M-1, 67M-2, and 67M-4 as well as the pharmacodynamics of uric acid, xanthine, and hypoxanthine were determined in plasma (or serum) and urine. Febuxostat was safe and well tolerated. Regression analyses indicated that febuxostat tmax and Cmax,u values were not affected by CLcr. However, for AUC24,u, CLu/F, and t1/2z, regression analyses indicated a statistically significant relationship with CLcr. With the exception of 67M-1 Cmax, regression analyses for 67M-2 and 67M-4 Cmax, and for AUC24 for all 3 metabolites indicated a statistically significant linear relationship with CLcr. Irrespective of renal function group, the mean serum uric acid concentrations decreased by 55% to 64% by day 7. Although plasma exposure to febuxostat and its metabolites was generally higher in subjects with increasing degrees of renal impairment, the percentages of decrease in serum uric acid were comparable regardless of the renal function group. A once-daily 80-mg dose of febuxostat appears to be safe and well tolerated in different renal function groups and does not appear to require any dose adjustment based on differences in renal function.     

The cardiac pharmacodynamics of therapeutic doses of sparfloxacin.

This double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study assessed the cardiac safety of sparfloxacin (as measured by the effect on corrected QT [QTc] interval) at the extremes of the expected therapeutic dosage range. Ninety healthy adult male volunteers with no clinically relevant electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities received either placebo or 1 of 3 sparfloxacin regimens consisting of a loading dose on day 1 followed by 3 days of daily dosing at half the loading dose (200/100 mg, 400/200 mg, or 800/400 mg). After each dose, serial blood samples and ECG measurements were obtained to determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variables for sparfloxacin. Increases in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) for each dosing interval and in the maximum concentration (Cmax) on days 1 and 4 were dose proportional. The steady-state (day-4) values were 6% to 16% lower than the day-1 values. At steady state, the time to C ranged from 2.5 to 3.9 hours across all doses and days studied. The half-life ranged from 18.7 to 20.3 hours. Increases in the placebo-adjusted mean change and mean maximum change in QTc interval were dose related. The placebo-adjusted increases on day 1 were 9, 16, and 28 milliseconds after receipt of the 200/100-mg, 400/200-mg, and 800/400-mg regimens, respectively. The corresponding increases on day 4 were 7, 12, and 26 milliseconds. The placebo-adjusted changes in QTc interval also showed a linear relationship with the AUC0-24 and Cmax of sparfloxacin. In the majority of volunteers (>90%), these increases were within the normal range for the QTc interval (< or = 460 milliseconds).     

Pharmacokinetic study of memantine in healthy and renally impaired subjects

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the Alzheimer's disease treatment memantine in subjects with normal and impaired renal function. METHODS: This was a single-center, single-dose, open-label study. Thirty-two subjects aged 18 to 80 years were assigned to 1 of 4 groups (8 subjects each) based on baseline creatinine clearance: normal renal function (>80 mL/min), mild renal impairment (50-80 mL/min), moderate renal impairment (30-49 mL/min), and severe renal impairment (5-29 mL/min). A single 20-mg memantine dose was administered under fasting conditions. Assessments included pharmacokinetic and safety measures. RESULTS: Thirty-one subjects completed the study. There were no relevant differences in maximum memantine plasma concentration between subjects with normal and impaired renal function of any severity. The mean area under the plasma concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity was similar between subjects with normal and mildly impaired renal function but increased by 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24%-97%) and 115% (95% CI, 77%-152%) in subjects with moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. Simulations predicted steady-state maximum concentration values of 82 ng/mL (95% CI, 70-95 ng/mL), 85 ng/mL (95% CI, 70-101 ng/mL), and 128 ng/mL (95% CI, 109-147 ng/mL) in healthy subjects, those with mild renal impairment, and those with moderate renal impairment, respectively, for the recommended dosing regimen of 10 mg twice daily; for subjects with severe renal impairment, a steady-state maximum concentration value of 84 ng/mL (95% CI, 68-101 ng/mL) was predicted for a dosing regimen of 5 mg twice daily. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the predicted steady-state plasma concentrations with the use of the current dosing regimen of 10 mg twice daily, no dosage adjustments are needed for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. A target dose of 5 mg twice daily is recommended in patients with severe renal impairment.     

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous cefetamet and oral cefetamet pivoxil in patients with renal insufficiency.

The pharmacokinetics of cefetamet after a short intravenous infusion of cefetamet (515 mg) and oral administration of 1,000 mg of cefetamet pivoxil were studied in 9 healthy subjects and in 38 patients with various degrees of renal impairment. The results showed that cefetamet elimination was dependent on renal function. After intravenous dosing, total body (CLS), renal (CLR), and nonrenal (CLNR) clearances were linearly related to creatinine clearance (CLCR; r = 0.95, 0.92, and 0.59, respectively). Elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) was prolonged from 2.46 +/- 0.33 h in normal subjects to 29.1 +/- 13.9 h in patients with CLCR of less than 10 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Correspondingly, CLS and CLR decreased from 1.77 +/- 0.27 and 1.42 +/- 0.25 ml/min per kg to 0.14 +/- 0.04 and 0.04 +/- 0.03 ml/min per kg, respectively. The volume of distribution at steady state (0.298 +/- 0.049 liter/kg) for cefetamet was not altered by renal insufficiency (P greater than 0.05). After oral administration, the elimination parameters, t1/2 beta and CLR, were insignificantly different from the intravenous data (P greater than 0.05). Furthermore, the bioavailability (F) of cefetamet pivoxil (45 +/- 13%) was not altered by renal failure (P greater than 0.05). However, maximum concentration in plasma and the time to achieve this value were significantly increased (5.86 +/- 0.74 versus 14.8 +/- 6.14 micrograms/ml and 3.9 +/- 1.1 versus 8.4 +/- 1.7 h, respectively; P less than 0.05). Based on these observations, it is recommended that patients with CLcr of <10 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and between 10 and 39 ml/min per 1.73 m2 be given one-quarter of the normal daily dose either once or twice daily. Patients with CLcr between 40 and 80 ml/min per 1.73 m2 should receive one-half of the normal dose twice daily. For patients with CLcr of <10 ml/min per 1.73 m2, it would be recommended that they receive a normal standard dose as a loading dose on day 1 of treatment.     

Effect of single ascending, supratherapeutic doses of sparfloxacin on cardiac repolarization (QTc interval).

This double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in healthy adult male and female volunteers with no clinically relevant baseline electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities to assess the cardiac tolerability margin of sparfloxacin (as measured by the effect on QTc interval) under conditions of potential overdose at up to 4 times the usual therapeutic loading dose. The 23 enrolled volunteers received a sequence of single doses of sparfloxacin (400, 800, 1200, and 1600 mg), 1 dose in each of 4 study periods. Six volunteers received placebo during each period. A 14-day washout separated the periods. Serial blood samples and ECG measurements were collected in each period to determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of sparfloxacin. The area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) exhibited dose proportionality. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) after the 1200- and 1600-mg doses was lower than would be expected for a linear dose relationship. This was also the case with the mean increase and mean maximum increase in QTc interval. Increases in the QTc interval correlated well with Cmax but not with AUC0-infinity. The time to reach Cmax showed a slight tendency to increase with dose, as did the terminal elimination half-life. Changes in QTc-interval dispersion were similar for both placebo recipients and sparfloxacin-treated volunteers and were of no clinical consequence. At supratherapeutic doses, the extent of sparfloxacin's absorption (AUC0-infinity) was dose independent; however, the rate of absorption was dose dependent, with Cmax increasing substantially less than proportionally to the administered dose. This limited the Cmax of sparfloxacin at supratherapeutic doses and thus the increase in QTc interval. Rechallenge demonstrated that only 2 of 8 subjects had the same degree of QTc-interval prolongation, emphasizing the marked variability in the QTc interval.     

The effect of terfenadine on the cardiac pharmacodynamics of sparfloxacin.

This double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the effect of concomitant administration of terfenadine and sparfloxacin on the electrocardiographic (ECG) QT(c) interval in healthy volunteers, before the removal of terfenadine from the market. Eighty-eight men (aged 18 to 49 years, weighing 60.0 to 98.6 kg) with no clinically relevant ECG abnormalities received placebo, sparfloxacin (400 mg on day 1, 200 mg daily on days 2-4), terfenadine (60 mg BID), or the combination of sparfloxacin and terfenadine. After each dose, serial blood samples and ECG measurements were collected to determine sparfloxacin pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variables. The area under the concentration-time curve and maximum concentration for sparfloxacin were approximately 16% less on day 4 compared with day 1, reflecting the higher plasma level after the 400-mg loading dose compared with that after the maintenance dose of 200 mg daily. Concomitant administration of terfenadine had no effect on these pharmacokinetic variables. When compared with the placebo-adjusted increases in QTc interval in the sparfloxacin (19 milliseconds on day 1 and 14 milliseconds on day 4) and terfenadine (2 milliseconds on day 1 and 7 milliseconds on day 4) treatment groups, the placebo-adjusted increases in QTc interval in the volunteers treated with the combination of sparfloxacin and terfenadine (18 milliseconds on day 1 and 22 milliseconds on day 4) were considered to be additive (no statistically significant interaction). Thus there are no apparent pharmacokinetic or dynamic QTc interactions between terfenadine and sparfloxacin. However, sparfloxacin should be administered with caution to patients receiving concomitant medications known to prolong the QTc interval.     

Isepamicin disposition in subjects with various degrees of renal function.

The disposition of isepamicin, an investigational aminoglycoside antibiotic, was evaluated in 30 subjects with various degrees of renal function. The subjects were divided into five groups: those with normal renal function (creatinine clearance [CLCR], greater than 80 ml/min/1.73 m2), those with mild renal insufficiency (CLCR, 50 to 80 ml/min/1.73 m2), those with moderate renal insufficiency (CLCR, 30 to 49 ml/min/1.73 m2), those with severe renal insufficiency (CLCR, 5 to 29 ml/min/1.73 m2), and those maintained on hemodialysis (CLCR, less than 5 ml/min/1.73 m2). Subjects on hemodialysis were studied both during hemodialysis and during an interdialytic period. The volumes of distribution of isepamicin were not significantly different among the five groups of patients. The total body clearance (CLP) and renal clearance (CLR) of isepamicin significantly decreased as CLCR decreased. The CLP of isepamicin and CLCR were significantly related [(COP = 0.391.[CLCR] + 1.83; r2 = 0.878)]. Nonrenal clearance of isepamicin did not differ between groups. Hemodialysis augmented the CLP of isepamicin by approximately 25-fold. The amount of isepamicin recovered in the dialysate was 60.6 +/- 15.8% of the dose administered. The maximal rebound of the isepamicin concentration in plasma after cessation of hemodialysis was observed at 0.78 +/- 0.7 h. Concentrations in plasma increased 32.7 +/- 22.9% over that measured at the end of hemodialysis. These data indicate that dosage adjustments are necessary in subjects with decreased renal function.     

Pharmacokinetics of cefadroxil in normal subjects and in patients with renal insufficiency.

Pharmacokinetics of cefadroxil, a new orally semisynthetic cephalosporin, was studied in 5 subjects with normal renal function and in 20 patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency. All subjects received 1,000 mg per os in a single dose and the elimination phase was studied. In healthy subjects, elimination half-life (T1/2) was 1.39 +/- 0.06 h. Apparent volume of distribution was 0.305 liters/kg and area under the serum concentration versus time curve AUC was 82.94 +/- 19.98 microgram . h/ml. Peak level averaged 25.72 +/- 4.68 microgram . ml-1 and occurred at 1.20 +/- 0.45 h postingestion. 93.0 +/- 3.6% of the dose was recovered in urine during the first 24 h. Renal and serum clearance averaged 166.7 and 172.4 ml . min-1/1.73 m2, respectively. In patients with renal insufficiency, T1/2 increased to 25.49 h in severe chronic renal failure. Renal impairment did not significantly modify volume of distribution. During a 6- to 8-hour hemodialysis session, antibiotic serum concentrations decreased by 75.4 +/- 5.6%. Dosage schedules could be suggested on the basis of these pharmacokinetic results.     

Cefmenoxime pharmacokinetics in patients with renal insufficiency.

The pharmacokinetics of cefmenoxime were determined after a 30-min intravenous infusion of 15 mg/kg of total body weight to 33 adult subjects with normal renal function (CLCR, greater than 80 ml/min per 1.73 m2, group I), mild renal insufficiency (CLCR, 40 to 79 ml/min per 1.73 m2, group II), moderate renal insufficiency (CLCR, 10 to 39 ml/min per 1.73 m2, group III), or severe renal impairment, (CLCR, less than 10 ml/min per 1.73 m2, group IV) or to patients between hemodialysis (CLCR, less than 10 ml/min per 1.73 m2, group V). Concentrations of cefmenoxime in serum and urine were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography, and serum concentrations were fit to a two-compartment model. There was no significant relationship between creatinine clearance and either peak serum concentrations or volume of distribution at steady state. Patients in group I excreted 81% of the dose into the urine within 24 h; recovery decreased with worsening renal function. The mean terminal half-lives in groups I to V were 1.06, 1.50, 3.55, 4.60, and 11.4 h, respectively. There were good linear relationships between creatinine clearance, and the elimination rate and total body clearance of cefmenoxime. Dosage recommendations for subjects with renal insufficiency are proposed.     

Effects of renal insufficiency and hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of rofecoxib

Rofecoxib (VIOXX, Merck & Co., West Point, PA) is a COX-2-selective inhibitor that combines anti-inflammatory and analgesic efficacy with improved gastrointestinal (GI) safety. The present open-label study investigated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single, oral dose of rofecoxib (50 mg) in patients with end-stage renal failure (creatinine clearance <5 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) requiring hemodialysis. Rofecoxib AUC(0-48 h), AUC(0- infinity), C(max), T(max), and t(1/2) obtained from renal failure patients on hemodialysis were not significantly different from those obtained from healthy subjects. With hemodialysis initiated 48 hours postdose, rofecoxib AUC(0-48 h) adjusted mean ratio (renal failure/healthy subjects) was 0.81, with a corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI; 0.66, 1.00). Hemodialysis per se had no clinically meaningful effect on rofecoxib pharmacokinetics: plasma rofecoxib concentration-time curves were virtually superimposable when hemodialysis was initiated at 4 or 48 hours following rofecoxib dosing, although mean rofecoxib C(max) was 18% lower during the former (325 versus 395 ng/mL; P = 0.014). Overall, rofecoxib was well tolerated in end-stage renal disease patients. In this study, end-stage renal disease and hemodialysis had little effect on rofecoxib pharmacokinetics. Although there are no clinical data to support the use of rofecoxib in patients with severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance, 5-30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), these data suggest that dosage adjustment of rofecoxib is not needed for patients with impaired renal function.     

Pharmacokinetics of telbivudine in subjects with various degrees of renal impairment

This study evaluates the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of telbivudine. Thirty-six subjects were assigned, on the basis of creatinine clearance (CL(CR)), to 1 of 5 renal function groups with 6 to 8 subjects per group: normal renal function; mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment; or end-stage renal disease [ESRD] requiring hemodialysis. Subjects received a single oral dose of telbivudine at 600 mg (normal function and mild impairment), 400 mg (moderate impairment), or 200 mg (severe impairment and ESRD); plasma and/or urine samples were collected over a 48-h period for pharmacokinetic analyses. Telbivudine was well tolerated by all subjects. The pharmacokinetics of 600 mg of telbivudine were comparable for subjects with mild renal impairment and normal renal function. Likewise, for subjects with moderate to severe impairment, including ESRD, reduced doses from 200 to 400 mg produced plasma exposure similar to that for subjects with normal renal function. These results indicate that the pharmacokinetics of telbivudine were dependent on renal function, especially for subjects with moderate to severe renal impairment or ESRD. Apparent total plasma clearance, renal clearance (CL(R)), and urinary excretion of telbivudine decreased as renal function deteriorated. A linear relationship was established between CL(R) and CL(CR). In ESRD subjects, a routine 3.5- to 4-h hemodialysis session removed telbivudine from plasma at an extraction ratio of approximately 45%, representing a approximately 23% reduction in total exposure. These results suggest that while no adjustment of the telbivudine dose appears necessary for subjects with mild renal impairment, dose adjustment is warranted for those with moderate to severe renal impairment or ESRD in order to achieve optimal plasma exposure.     

Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in renal failure.

By using a highly specific chromatographic technique, the effect of renal failure on the pharmacokinetics of the six main components of teicoplanin, taken individually or as a whole, was assessed for over 120 h after administration of a 3-mg/kg intravenous dose to healthy volunteers (group 1, n = 6) and to noninfected patients with moderate (group 2, n = 6) or severe (group 3, n = 7) renal failure. In subjects with normal renal function, total teicoplanin was mainly excreted in urine and its concentrations in plasma could be adequately fitted to a three-compartment model. Renal failure did not affect the model or the distribution of teicoplanin but strongly decreased its renal clearance (9.3, 3.2, and 0.6 ml/h per kg, respectively, for the three groups of subjects), in close relationship with the creatinine clearance (r = 0.973, n = 18, P less than 0.001). The cumulative urinary excretion of unchanged total teicoplanin was decreased (50, 21, and 5% of the given dose for groups 1 to 3) and the terminal half-life was enhanced (62, 96, and 111 h for groups 1 to 3) by renal impairment. The relative behavior of the six major components was only slightly affected by renal failure. Consequently, the dosage regimen adjustment could be based on the total teicoplanin concentration, and simulations with the mean estimated pharmacokinetic parameters suggest that the 6-mg/kg daily dose, known to be effective in patients with normal renal function, could be given every 2 and 3 days in patients with moderate and severe renal insufficiency, respectively.     

Pharmacokinetics of cefonicid in uraemic patients

Eight subjects with normal renal function and 20 uraemic patients with various degrees of renal insufficiency were given a single iv dose of 1.0 g cefonicid, as a bolus injection. Five groups of subjects were studied: group I, GFR greater than 80 ml/min, group II 30 less than GFR less than 80 ml/min, group III 10 less than GFR less than 30 ml/min, group IV GFR less than or equal to 10 ml/min and group V, haemodialysis patients. Cefonicid concentrations in plasma and urine were measured by microbiological assay (MA) and HPLC method. Results were similar with the two techniques. The mean peak plasma levels were 200-300 mg/l and the apparent volume of distribution was 0.18-0.20 1/kg for all patients. The elimination half-life (T 1(2) beta) increased as renal function decreased: 5.31 +/- 1.30 h in healthy subjects and 58.92 +/- 12.38 h in patients with end-stage renal disease. Urinary elimination of cefonicid was inversely related to the degree of renal impairment: 83% of the dose in 24 h in normal subjects and 13.6% of the dose in patients with severe renal failure. Total body clearance decreased from 23.9 +/- 3.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 (group I) to 1.9 +/- 0.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 (group V). Renal clearance fell from 19.0 +/- 4.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 (group I) to 1.0 +/- 0.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 (group IV). The fractional clearance and the non renal clearance were similar in normal subjects and in uraemic patients. Cefonicid is not haemodializable because of its high protein binding. Dosage of cefonicid should be adjusted according to the degree of renal impairment. Supplemental doses are not necessary after haemodialysis.     

Effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of sparfloxacin.

Sparfloxacin, a fluoroquinolone with a broad antimicrobial spectrum and long elimination half-life, is indicated for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in adult patients. The present study was undertaken to determine the effects of skim milk and a high-fat breakfast without milk on the single-dose pharmacokinetic characteristics of this antibiotic. The pharmacokinetics of a single 200-mg dose of sparfloxacin were assessed in a 3-way crossover study that included 23 healthy male volunteers who had fasted, had ingested 240 mL of skim milk, or had consumed a standard high-fat breakfast. The subjects' mean age and weight were 26.5 years and 73.2 kg, respectively; 17 were white, 5 Hispanic, and 1 black. Neither skim milk nor the high-fat breakfast had a statistically significant effect on sparfloxacin absorption, as reflected in the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Ninety percent confidence limits for logarithmically transformed AUC from time zero to infinity and Cmax were within the 80% to 125% range, demonstrating that the rate and extent of sparfloxacin absorption with skim milk or a high-fat breakfast were not different from those under fasted conditions. As indicated by an increase in the time to Cmax from 3.6 to 5.4 hours, the high-fat breakfast slightly delayed the onset of sparfloxacin absorption. Skim milk and the high-fat breakfast did not significantly affect the elimination kinetics of sparfloxacin. Sparfloxacin was well tolerated in all 3 treatment groups. Despite the apparent delay in the onset of absorption, the bioavailability of sparfloxacin in the healthy male subjects in this study population was not affected by concomitant administration with skim milk or a high-fat meal. Accordingly, the results suggest that sparfloxacin can be administered without regard to the ingestion of milk or meals.     

Effects of impaired renal function, hemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis on the pharmacokinetics of mezlocillin

The pharmacokinetics of mezlocillin were examined in 8 patients with normal renal function (inulin clearance, > 80 ml/min per 1.73 m2), 32 patients with moderately reduced renal function (inulin clearances, 80 to 5 ml/min per 1.73 m2), and 12 patients maintained by hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis because of severely impaired renal function. A single dose of 60 mg of mezlocillin per kg of body weight was infused intravenously over 30 min. Antibiotic concentrations in plasma, urine, and dialysate were determined by the agar diffusion technique. The half-life of mezlocillin increased with decreasing renal function from an average of 53 min in subjects with normal function to 165 min in oligoanuric patients. The urinary recovery of this drug in 24 h decreased from 65% at a glomerular filtration rate of 92 ml/min to 7.6% at a glomerular filtration rate of 6.7 ml/min. Volume of distribution was not changed by the renal insufficiency, amounting on the average to 22.5% of body weight. Intermittent hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis contributed to only a minor degree to the 24-h mezlocillin kinetics. The pharmacokinetic properties of mezlocillin permit a normal dosage over wide ranges of renal insufficiency; however, when the glomerular filtration rate is below 10 ml/min, the dosage interval should be increased from 8 to 12 h.     

Kinetic disposition of intravenous ceftriaxone in normal subjects and patients with renal failure on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.

The kinetic disposition of a single intravenous dose of ceftriaxone (250 to 665 mg) was studied in six normal subjects and nine patients with renal insufficiency and normal hepatic function. In normal subjects, ceftriaxone was eliminated with a t1/2 beta of 5.2 h (range, 4.1 to 5.8). The total body clearance (Qb) was 13.5 ml/kg per h (range, 8.4 to 23.3), and renal clearance was 8.3 ml/kg per h (range, 5.8 to 13.3). In patients with severe renal insufficiency requiring peritoneal or hemodialysis, the mean t1/2 beta was prolonged to 13.4 h (range, 7.7 to 15.8) and the mean Qb was reduced to 6.9 ml/kg per h (range, 3.4 to 12.8). The apparent volumes of distribution (Vc and Vss) were not different from those determined in normal subjects. Peritoneal dialysis did not remove ceftriaxone. The dialysate of three patients on continuous peritoneal dialysis did not contain any measureable ceftriaxone, and the kinetic disposition in these patients was similar to the hemodialysis patients between their dialysis treatment. During a 4-h hemodialysis session, the total body clearance of ceftriaxone was reduced, perhaps secondary to a decrease in hepatic blood flow induced by the hemodialysis procedure. After a 12- or 24-h dose regimen, predicted trough concentrations of ceftriaxone in plasma at steady state derived from kinetic data generated from the study and assuming linear pharmacokinetic behavior were well above the minimum inhibitory concentrations of most sensitive bacteria, suggesting the feasibility of a once-a-day dosage regimen especially for patients with severe renal insufficiency.     

Lomefloxacin pharmacokinetics in subjects with normal and impaired renal function.

Lomefloxacin pharmacokinetics were investigated in 6 normal subjects and 24 uremic patients after a single oral dose of 400 mg. In subjects with normal renal function, the peak level in plasma averaged 3.5 +/- 0.9 micrograms/ml (mean +/- standard deviation) and was obtained at 1.3 +/- 0.9 h. The absorption rate constant was 3.8 +/- 1.6 h-1. The terminal half-life was 7.77 +/- 0.95 h. The apparent volume of distribution was 2.54 +/- 0.66 liters/kg. Total body and renal clearances were 259 +/- 83 and 200 +/- 55 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. The percentage of the dose recovered unchanged in 48-h urine was 80.6 +/- 2.8. In uremic patients, the terminal half-life increased in relation to the degree of renal failure: from 8 h in normal subjects to 38 h in severely uremic patients (glomerular filtration rate, less than 10 ml/min). Renal insufficiency did not significantly modify the peak level in plasma, the time to peak, the apparent volume of distribution, or the nonrenal clearance of lomefloxacin. The dialysis clearance of lomefloxacin was 54 +/- 13 ml/min. Linear relationships were found between lomefloxacin pharmacokinetic parameters and glomerular filtration rate data. Dosage adjustments are necessary in uremic patients.     

Pharmacokinetics of ticarcillin and clavulanic acid (timentin) in relation to renal function.

The disposition of coadministered ticarcillin (3 g/1.73 m2) and clavulanic acid (100 mg/1.73 m2) was examined after a 30-min infusion in 24 noninfected subjects with various degrees of renal function. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters for the individual compounds were determined from plasma concentrations and urinary excretion rates. All clearances (total, renal, and nonrenal) and urinary recoveries of unchanged drug were found to be linearly related to creatinine clearance (CLCR). The steady-state volume of distribution (9.9 and 12.9 liters for ticarcillin and clavulanic acid) approximated the extracellular fluid space and was not related to CLCR. The half-lives increased with reduced renal function and ranged from 56 to 392 min for ticarcillin and 26 to 266 min for clavulanic acid. The clearances of both drugs decreased proportionately with reduction in renal function, facilitating dosing adjustments based on CLCR. Calculations of expected steady-state maximum and minimum concentrations in plasma using constant doses and an extended dosing interval related to CLCR further rationalized use of the 30:1 drug combination ratio for all patients.     

Disposition of cefpodoxime proxetil in healthy volunteers and patients with impaired renal function.

The disposition of cefpodoxime in 24 subjects with various degrees of renal function after administration of a single oral dose of 200 mg of cefpodoxime proxetil (equivalent to 200 mg of cefpodoxime activity) was studied. Subjects were assigned to one of four groups (six per group): group I, normal renal function (creatinine clearance [CLCR], greater than ml/min); group II, mild renal impairment (CLCR, 50 to 80 ml/min); group III, moderate renal impairment (CLCR, 30 to 49 ml/min); or group IV, severe renal impairment (CLCR, 5 to 29 ml/min). Although cefpodoxime terminal elimination half-life in group I (2.55 +/- 0.25 h [mean +/- standard deviation]) was not significantly different from that in group II (3.53 +/- 0.74 h), the half-life values for group III (5.90 +/- 1.67 h) and group IV (9.80 +/- 1.21 h) were significantly prolonged compared with those of group I. The mean absorption rate constant was similar among groups and ranged from 0.68 to 0.85 h-1. All groups exhibited absorption lag-times which were comparable (0.30 to 0.41 h), and the apparent volume of distribution was similar among groups. Cefpodoxime apparent total body clearance (CLP/F) values in groups II, III, and IV (132 +/- 29, 112 +/- 41, and 55.7 +/- 9.9 ml/min, respectively) were significantly lower than that in group I (238 +/- 44 ml/min). Cefpodoxime CLP/F was positively correlated with CLCR (r2 = 0.79; P less than 0.05): CLP/F = (1.9 CLCR) + 18.4. Renal clearance also declined with decreasing renal function. Adjustments in cefpodoxime organism and on the site and severity of infection. Simulated plasma concentration-time data from this study suggest that 200 mg of cefpodoxime proxetil administered every 12 to 24 h to subjects with CLcr between 30 and 49 ml/min and 200-mg dose taken every 24 h by subjects with CLcr between 5 and 29 ml/min will maintain cefpodoxime concentration in plasma similar to those in subjects with normal renal function who receive a standard dosage mg every 12 h.     

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin (BAL5788) in healthy volunteers

BAL5788 is the water-soluble prodrug of BAL9141, a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin with potent bactericidal activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Safety and pharmacokinetic data from a multiple-dose study with 16 healthy male volunteers are reported. Subjects were randomized to receive BAL5788 at 500 or 750 mg (as BAL9141 equivalents; n = 6 subjects per dose) or placebo (n = 2 subjects per dose). The doses were given as 200-ml infusions over 30 min once daily on days 1 and 8 and twice daily on days 2 to 7. BAL5788 was well tolerated, with no severe or serious adverse events (AEs) or dosing-related changes in laboratory parameters, electrocardiographic findings, or vital signs. Drug accumulation in plasma was negligible during the dosing period. The results of pharmacokinetic analyses agreed well with data reported from a previous single-ascending-dose study. The elimination half-life of BAL9141 was about 3 h. The volume of distribution at steady state was equal to the volume of the adult extracellular water compartment. BAL9141 was predominantly eliminated in urine, and renal clearance of the free drug corresponded to the normal glomerular filtration rate in adults. After multiple infusions of 750 mg, the mean concentrations of BAL9141 in plasma exceeded the MIC at which 100% of MRSA isolates are inhibited (4 microg/ml) for approximately 7 to 9 h, corresponding to 58 to 75% of a 12-h dosing interval.