Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF RUO assay and IS6110 real-time PCR for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection in clinical samples

The Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF research-use-only (RUO) assay and a laboratory-developed test (LDT) targeting IS6110 were evaluated and compared to mycobacterial culture as the gold standard. The performance characteristics of both molecular assays were determined by using 112 specimens from 90 patients, including 89 pulmonary specimens and 23 extrapulmonary specimens. Of the specimens tested, 37 (33%) were culture positive for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex; 29 were pulmonary, and 8 were extrapulmonary. Of these culture-positive specimens, 83% of the pulmonary specimens and 50% of the extrapulmonary specimens were smear positive. There was complete concordance between the smear-positive culture-positive specimens, independent of the anatomical site (100% sensitivity). The sensitivity of the MTB/RIF RUO assay for smear-negative specimens was 60% for pulmonary and 75% for extrapulmonary specimens, while the IS6110 LDT sensitivities were 40% and 0%, respectively. There was also complete concordance among the culture-negative specimens tested. Both assays showed 95% specificity, with four culture-negative specimens testing as positive. A review of patient records indicated that there was a high likelihood of the presence of M. tuberculosis complex DNA in the false-positive specimens. Biosafety analysis was performed and showed an acceptable reduction in organism viability using the processing methods described above. Both molecular assays are suitable for the detection of M. tuberculosis isolates in smear-positive pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens, while the sensitivity of the detection of M. tuberculosis isolates in smear-negative specimens was variable.     

Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens

A total of 217 specimens submitted for routine smear and culture from three different sites within the western United States were used to evaluate the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay (for research use only) (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA). Overall agreement compared to culture was 89% (98% for smear positives and 72% for smear negatives) for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.     

Comparison of two nucleic acid amplification assays, the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and the amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct assay, for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens

We compared the performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, a new real-time tuberculosis (TB) PCR test, with that of the Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct (MTD) assay using 162 respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens. Based on culture as the gold standard, the overall sensitivity and specificity for all sample types for the Xpert MTB/RIF assay were 90.9 and 89%, respectively, while for the MTD assay, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 97.3 and 87.1%, respectively. A higher proportion of total equivocal results were obtained for the MTD assay, at 10.5% (17/162), while the Xpert MTB/RIF assay generated 5.5% (9/162) of invalid reads.     

Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis

We prospectively investigated the diagnostic utility of the Xpert MTB/RIF (Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampin [RIF] resistance) assay in 20 cases with confirmed tuberculous pleural effusion. The sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert assay in pleural fluid were 25% and 100%, respectively. All cases positive by the Xpert assay were also positive by pleural fluid culture.     

Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction detection test and Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection test and the first-generation Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). In this retrospective study of smear-negative PTB, we reviewed patient medical records to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of Xpert MTB/RIF, CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test, and the parallel test (positive result for either of the Xpert MTB/RIF and CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection tests) to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy against a composite reference standard. In total, 1553 patients were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of Xpert MTB/RIF, CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test, and the parallel test were 57.1%, 92.9%, 81.1%, 95.9%, and 0.75; 53.4%, 97.7%, 98.6%, 41.5%, and 0.76; and 66.2%, 90.8%, 95.5%, 47.7%, and 0.79, respectively. For the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) specimens, these values for Xpert MTB/RIF, CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test, and the parallel test were 68.8%, 97.7%, 99.2%, 43.9%, and 0.83; 61.7%, 97.7%, 99.1%, 38.9%, and 0.80; and 77.0%, 95.5%, 98.6%, 50.9%, and 0.86, respectively. CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test had moderate accuracy for smear-negative PTB, similar to Xpert MTB/RIF. The parallel test improved the sensitivity. BALF significantly improved the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of the test. The maximum diagnostic accuracy for smear-negative PTB was obtained with the parallel test and BALF specimens. BALF was the most effective specimen for diagnosing smear-negative PTB.

     

Contribution of PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens

AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the sensitivity of PCR versus culture of complex tuberculosis mycobacteria and to determine the delay between PCR results and identification of mycobacteria in culture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-nine pulmonary and 66 extrapulmonary specimens were analyzed. Samples were inoculated on liquid (MGIT, Bactec) and solid media (Coletsos) and respectively incubated 6 and 12 weeks. Identification was performed by reverse hybridization of PCR products to their complementary probes immobilized on membrane strips (Genotype MTBC, HAIN). Specimens DNA detection was realized by PCR (Cobas Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis test, Roche). RESULTS: Sensitivity of PCR for acid fast bacilli smear positive pulmonary (50/50) and extrapulmonary (7/7) specimens was 100%. Delay between PCR result and identification was 11 days for pulmonary specimens and 8 days for extrapulmonary specimens. Sensitivity of PCR for smear negative samples was, respectively, of 78.7% (37/47) and 51.8% (29/56) for pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens. In case of PCR positive result of a smear negative sample, a gap of respectively 13 and 12 days was obtained for pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens compared to identification. CONCLUSION: Positive PCR result for respiratory specimens allows a gap of 11 to 13 days in diagnosis in comparison with identification of mycobacteria in culture.     

Comparison of Xpert MTB/RIF with Line Probe Assay for Detection of Rifampin-Monoresistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The MTBDRplus line probe assay (LPA) and Xpert MTB/RIF have been endorsed by the World Health Organization for the rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis. However, there is no clarity regarding the superiority of one over the other. In a double-blinded prospective study, we evaluated the efficacy of the Xpert MTB/RIF on samples that were first tested by LPA under the revised national tuberculosis control program of India. A total of 405 sputum samples from suspected drug-resistant tuberculosis patients were included. Of these, 285 smear-positive samples were subjected to LPA. Seventy-two (25.8%) samples showed multidrug resistance, 62 (22.2%) showed rifampin monoresistance, 29 (10.3%) showed isoniazid monoresistance, and 116 (41.5%) were pan-susceptible. Six (2.1%) of the samples gave invalid results. Of the 62 rifampin-monoresistant samples by LPA, 38 (61.4%) showed rifampin resistance, while 21 (33.8%) were found susceptible to rifampin by Xpert MTB/RIF using cartridge version G4. Three (4.8%) samples gave an error. Of the 116 pan-susceptible samples, only 83 were available for Xpert MTB/RIF testing; 4 (5.1%) were rifampin resistant, 74 (94.8%) were susceptible, and 5 (6.0%) showed an error. The 25 discrepant samples were further subjected to MGIT960 drug susceptibility testing. The MGIT960 results showed 100% agreement with LPA results but only 64.4% agreement with Xpert MTB/RIF results. Sequencing analysis of discrepant samples showed 91.3% concordance with LPA but only 8.7% concordance with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. These findings indicate that by using Xpert MTB/RIF testing we might be underestimating the burden of drug-resistant tuberculosis and indicate that country-specific probes need to be designed to increase the sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF.     

Comparison of enhanced Mycobacterium tuberculosis amplified direct test with COBAS AMPLICOR Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens

The new Roche COBAS AMPLICOR Mycobacterium tuberculosis Assay was compared to the Gen-Probe enhanced Mycobacterium tuberculosis Amplified Direct Test (AMTDII). A total of 486 specimens (296 respiratory and 190 extrapulmonary) collected from 323 patients were tested in parallel with both assays. Results were compared with those of acid-fast staining and culture, setting the combination of culture and clinical diagnosis as the "gold standard." After resolution of discrepant results, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for AMTDII were 85.7, 100, 100, and 90.4% for respiratory specimens and 82.9, 100, 100, and 95. 5% for extrapulmonary specimens, respectively. The corresponding values for AMPLICOR were 94.2, 100, 100, and 96.6% for respiratory specimens and 85, 100, 100, and 96.1% for extrapulmonary specimens, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the results of both assays or, within each one, between respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens. The difference between AMTDII and AMPLICOR sensitivities was related to the presence of inhibitory samples, which the former assay, lacking an internal amplification control (IAC), could not detect. The overall inhibition rate for the AMPLICOR assay was 3.9% (19 specimens). It is concluded that, although both amplification assays proved to be rapid and specific for the detection of M. tuberculosis complex in clinical samples, AMPLICOR, by a completely automated amplification and detection procedure, was shown to be particularly feasible for a routine laboratory setting. Finally, AMTDII is potentially an excellent diagnostic technique for both respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens, provided that an IAC is included with the assay.     

Comparison of the Xpert MTB/RIF and Cobas TaqMan MTB Assays for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Respiratory Specimens

The Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) is a fully automated, cartridge-based real-time PCR assay designed to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampin resistance within 2 h. The performance of the Xpert assay has been evaluated in various clinical settings. However, there are few data comparing the Xpert assay to the Cobas TaqMan MTB test (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), one of the most widely utilized molecular assays for M. tuberculosis detection. In this prospective study, 320 consecutive respiratory specimens were processed simultaneously using acid-fast bacillus (AFB) staining, mycobacterial cultures with both solid and liquid media, and the Cobas and Xpert assays. The Xpert assay was performed with direct respiratory specimens, while the Cobas assay was done with decontaminated concentrated specimens. Based on the culture as a reference method, the overall sensitivities of the Cobas and Xpert assays were 71.4% and 67.9%, respectively. When AFB smear results were taken into consideration, the sensitivities of the Cobas assay for smear-positive and -negative specimens were 87% and 54%, while those of the Xpert assay were 67% and 69%, respectively. The Cobas assay showed 100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value (PPV) regardless of smear results, while the Xpert assay showed 100% specificity and 100% PPV for smear-positive specimens but 98% specificity and 60% PPV for smear-negative specimens. In conclusion, the Xpert assay showed performance that was slightly inferior to that of the Cobas assay but seems useful for the rapid detection of M. tuberculosis, considering that it was performed without laborious and time-consuming decontamination and concentration procedures.     

Evaluation of the Cobas TaqMan MTB test for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens

The Cobas TaqMan MTB test, based on real-time PCR technology, was evaluated for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) in respiratory specimens. A total of 1,093 samples from 446 patients, including 118 acid-fast smear-positive and 975 acid-fast smear-negative specimens, were investigated. Diagnostic cultures performed with 7H11 agar, Löwenstein-Jensen medium, and the Bactec MGIT 960 system were considered the reference methods. When discrepant results between the Cobas TaqMan MTB test and culture occurred, additional results from the BD MGIT TBc identification test and the GenoType Mycobacterium CM test performed on growth-positive and acid-fast-stain-positive MGIT tubes and review of the patient''s medical history were used for discrepancy analysis. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the Cobas TaqMan MTB test were 91.5%, 98.7%, 91.5%, and 98.7%, respectively. In general, the performance of the new Cobas TaqMan MTB test was comparable to that of the replaced Cobas Amplicor MTB system. The most prominent feature of the new system was its extraordinarily high sensitivity (79.5%) for detecting MTBC in smear-negative specimens; out of 44 smear-negative but culture-positive specimens, 35 were positive by the new system. The Cobas TaqMan MTB assay, including DNA extraction, can be completed within 3 h.     

Comparison of the real-time PCR method and the Gen-Probe amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary and nonpulmonary specimens

Real-time PCR was compared to Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Test (AMTDII) for 100 clinical specimens. The overall sensitivities of the real-time PCR method and AMTDII were similar for respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens. However, real-time PCR seemed to be less susceptible to amplification inhibitors than AMTDII.     

Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Cerebrospinal Fluid

Studies investigating Xpert MTB/RIF diagnostic performance on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples are lacking in resource-rich settings. Xpert MTB/RIF results for 740 CSF samples from 698 patients across England were retrospectively compared with the results of culture of the same and contemporary samples. The overall sensitivity was calculated at 55%.     

Performance of an IS6110-based PCR assay and the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB PCR system for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA in human lymph node samples

We compared the performance of two PCR assays, an IS6110-based in-house protocol and the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB PCR (COBAS MTB) system, for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in 43 human lymph node samples from 40 patients. For the in-house PCR and the COBAS MTB assays, respectively, sensitivities were 87.5% versus 45.5% (P < 0.05), specificities were 100.0% versus 91.3% (P > 0.05), and inhibition rates were 4.8% versus 19.5% (P < 0.05). For the COBAS MTB system, additional N-acetyl-L-cysteine-NaOH pretreatment of the samples changed neither the inhibition rate nor the sensitivity significantly.     

Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Blood by Use of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay

We have developed a novel blood lysis-centrifugation approach for highly sensitive Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection in large volumes of blood with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. One through 20 ml of blood was spiked with 0.25 to 10 CFU/ml of the M. tuberculosis surrogate M. bovis BCG. Multiple replicates of each sample were processed by a new lysis-centrifugation method and tested with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. The assay was very sensitive with increased blood volumes. In the 20-ml samples, BCG was detected in blood spiked with 10, 5, 1, and 0.25 CFU/ml 100, 100, 83, and 57% of the time, respectively, compared to 100, 66, 18, and 18%, of the time, respectively, in 1-ml blood samples. Assay sensitivity was influenced by the type of anticoagulant used, with acid-citrate-dextrose solution B (ACD-B) providing the best results. A limit of detection of 10 CFU/ml was established with BCG spiked into ACD-B-treated blood, and 92, 36, and 33% of the samples with 5, 1, and 0.5 CFU/ml, respectively, were assay positive. The lysis buffer was stable both at room temperature and at 4°C for 2 months. The assay was tested with blood stored for 8 days without a change in sensitivity as measured by cycle threshold. This new assay format extends the capability of the Xpert MTB/RIF test, enabling up to 20 ml of blood to be tested rapidly for the presence of M. tuberculosis. This approach may be a useful method to detect extrapulmonary tuberculosis and the risk of death in immunocompromised patients.     

Xpert MTB/RIF技术对结核分枝杆菌的诊断价值

目的 对Xpert MTB/RIF技术检测结核分枝杆菌（MTB）的结果进行分析并评估其价值。方法 采集2017年10月~2018年10月本院就诊疑为结核分枝杆菌感染的患者共580例,利用Xpert MTB/RIF技术对其痰液（或体液）标本进行DNA检测,同时将标本进行固体培养及涂片抗酸染色并对检测结果进行比较。结果 Xpert MTB/RIF技术检测MTB的阳性率为18.97%（110/580）,和固体培养法的阳性率18.62%（108/580）相比差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）;和抗酸染色法的阳性率15.00%（87/580）相比则更为敏感,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。 结论 Xpert MTB/RIF检测技术和固体培养法不相上下,且由于抗酸染色法,可以用于MTB的快速筛选。     

Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in detecting epididymal tuberculosis

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases - To assess the diagnostic efficacy of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in detecting epididymal tuberculosis. We analyzed 84 samples from...     

Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a diagnostic evaluation study

ObjectivesThe diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) is often made on clinical suspicion alone, resulting in both under- and overdiagnosis and relatively poor outcomes. In this study, we evaluated the clinical utility of the Xpert MTB/RIF on routinely collected extrapulmonary specimens in Ethiopia.MethodsThis study was carried out at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Extrapulmonary specimens were collected from 572 patients clinically suspected of suffering from EPTB. All specimens were tested for TB by smear microscopy, culture, and Xpert MTB/RIF. The diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF was calculated and compared to a composite reference standard (CRS), comprising clinical and laboratory results.ResultsIn total, 572 extrapulmonary specimens (279 lymph node, 159 pleural, 80 peritoneal, 45 cerebrospinal, and nine pericardial fluids) were tested. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF were calculated to be 75% (95% CI 70–80) and 98% (95% CI 97–100) respectively when compared to the CRS. The highest sensitivity was documented for lymph node specimens (90%; 95% CI 86–94), moderate sensitivity for cerebrospinal fluid (53%; 95% CI 28–79), while the sensitivity was lowest for pleural (30%; 95% CI 17–44) and peritoneal (32%; 95% CI 12–51) fluids. Xpert MTB/RIF in addition detected rifampicin resistance in 13 patients, in perfect agreement with results from the line probe assay.ConclusionsXpert MTB/RIF may be used as initial diagnostic tool for testing of lymph node specimens from patients suspected of having TB lymphadenitis. The added value of Xpert MTB/RIF to diagnose pleural or peritoneal TB is limited by its poor sensitivity.     

Evaluation of the Xpert MTB/RIF test accuracy for diagnosis of tuberculosis in areas with a moderate tuberculosis burden

The Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) is a molecular assay used for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in clinical specimens. In this study, we aimed to assess the accuracy of the Xpert assay for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in TB suspected patients from the northern region of Iran. The obtained results were compared with the culture method. The sputum specimens were examined using the Xpert assay, smear microscopy, and solid culture media as a reference diagnostic tool. Among 293 presumptive TB cases, 92 (31.4%) were positive according to the culture method. The Xpert method detected 88 (95.7%) cases that were positive according to the culture method, compared with 78 (84.8%) positive cases according to smear microscopy. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert method for TB diagnosis were 95.7% and 99%, respectively. Also, the sensitivity and specificity for smear microscopy were 84.8% and 97.5%, respectively. The Xpert assay showed high overall sensitivity and specificity; thus, it can be effectively used for the early and accurate diagnosis of MTB in TB endemic areas. In addition, the agreement between semi‐quantitative results of Xpert and smear microscopy assays could be helpful in evaluating transmission potential in TB patients.     

Clinical Evaluation of the Gen-Probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in select nonrespiratory specimens

The performance of the Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test (MTD; Gen-Probe, Inc., San Diego, Calif.) for rapid diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis was evaluated by testing 178 nonrespiratory specimens from 158 patients. Criteria for specimen inclusion were (i) a positive smear for acid-fast bacilli (n = 54) and (ii) the source if the smear was negative (tissue biopsies and aspirates and abscess material were tested; n = 124). Results were compared to those of mycobacterial culture; clinical history was reviewed when MTD and culture results disagreed. Forty-eight specimens (27.0%) were positive for mycobacteria, including 23 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex specimens; of which 21 were smear positive. Twenty-five specimens were MTD positive; 20 of these grew M. tuberculosis complex. All of the five MTD-positive, M. tuberculosis complex culture-negative specimens were considered truly positive, based on review of the medical record. Of the three MTD-negative, M. tuberculosis complex culture-positive specimens, two contained inhibitory substances; one of the two was smear positive. Excluding the latter specimen from analysis, after chart review, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the MTD were 92.6, 100, 100, and 98.7%, respectively, by specimen and 89.5, 100, 100, and 98.6% by patient. Given the few smear-negative samples from patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis in our study, additional similar studies that include more smear-negative, M. tuberculosis complex culture-positive specimens to confirm our data are desirable.