Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain

Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain.

Objective

To examine the psychometric properties including test-retest reliability, construct validity, and minimum levels of detectable and clinically important change for the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain in a cohort of patients with neck pain.

Design

Single-group repeated-measures design.

Setting

Outpatient physical therapy (PT) clinics.

Participants

Patients (N=137) presenting to PT with a primary report of neck pain.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

All patients completed the NDI and the NRS at the baseline examination and at a follow-up. At the time of the follow-up, all patients also completed the global rating of change, which was used to dichotomize patients as improved or stable. Baseline and follow-up scores were used to determine the test-retest reliability, construct validity, and minimal levels of detectable and clinically important change for both the NDI and NRS.

Results

Test-retest reliability was calculated using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (NDI ICC=.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], .25-.67; NRS ICC=.76; 95% CI, .51-.87). The area under the curve was .83 (95% CI, .75-.90) for the NDI score and .85 (95% CI, .78-.93) for the NRS score for determining between stable and improved patients. Thresholds for the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the NDI were 19-percentage points and 1.3 for the NRS.

Conclusions

Both the NDI and NRS exhibit fair to moderate test-retest reliability in patients with mechanical neck pain. Both instruments also showed adequate responsiveness in this patient population. However, the MCID required to be certain that the change in scores has surpassed a level that could be contributed to measurement error for the NDI was twice that which has previously been reported. Therefore the ongoing analyses of the properties of the NDI in a patient population with neck pain are warranted.     

A psychometric evaluation of measures of spirituality validated in culturally diverse palliative care populations

Context

Despite the need to accurately measure spiritual outcomes in diverse palliative care populations, little attention has been paid to the properties of the tools currently in use.

Objectives

This systematic review aimed to appraise the psychometric properties, multifaith appropriateness, and completion time of spiritual outcome measures validated in multicultural advanced cancer, HIV, or palliative care populations.

Methods

Eight databases were searched to identify relevant validation and research studies. A comprehensive search strategy included search terms in three categories: palliative care, spirituality, and outcome measurement. Inclusion criteria were: validated in advanced cancer, HIV, or palliative care populations and in an ethnically diverse context. Included tools were evaluated with respect to psychometric properties (validity, reproducibility, responsiveness, and interpretability), multifaith appropriateness, and time to complete.

Results

A total of 191 articles were identified, yielding 85 tools. Twenty-six tools (representing four families of measures and five individual tools) met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four tools demonstrated good content validity and 12 demonstrated adequate internal consistency. Only eight tools demonstrated adequate construct validity, usually because specific hypotheses were not stated and tested. Seven tools demonstrated adequate test-retest reliability; two tools showed adequate responsiveness, and two met the interpretability criterion. Data on the religious faith of the population of validation were available for 11 tools; of these, eight were tested in multifaith populations.

Conclusion

Results suggest that, at present, the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Measuring the Quality of Life of Seriously Ill Patients Questionnaire, and the Palliative Outcome Scale are the most appropriate multidimensional measures containing spiritual items for use in multicultural palliative care populations. However, none of these measures score perfectly on all psychometric criteria, and their multifaith appropriateness requires further testing.     

The impact of selective neck dissection on shoulder and cervical spine movements

Objective

To investigate the deficits in function following a function-preserving neck dissection by comparing operative versus non-operative sides for cervical spine and shoulder movements in combination with patient self-completed questionnaires.

Participants

A consecutive cohort of 63 outpatients following levels I-III unilateral selective neck dissection were approached and all agreed to participate in the study.

Methods

Clinical examination included assessment of shoulder, shoulder girdle and cervical spine ranges of movement, measured by goniometry, tape measure and a cervical measurement system. Patient self-completed questionnaires included the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire (UW-QoL), the neck dissection impairment index and the shoulder disability questionnaire.

Results

Following unilateral selective neck dissection there was significant loss of shoulder flexion and abduction in the operated side compared to the non-operated side but not in regard to the other cervical spine and shoulder measurements. The loss of shoulder flexion averaged 9° (95% confidence interval: 3-14°) and the loss of shoulder abduction averaged 8° (95% confidence interval: 2-14°). The UW-QoL shoulder domain clearly identified patients with poor cervical spine and shoulder function.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the problems patients encounter even with a function-preserving neck dissection. The UW-QoL questionnaire can aid physiotherapists to screen patients needing early intervention and further assessments.     

Factor structure and concurrent/convergent validity of the modified somatic perception questionnaire and pain beliefs instrument

Objective

Our goal was to create a parsimonious combination of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ) and the Pain Beliefs Screening Instrument (PBSI) through factorial structural analysis and to investigate the associations of the new scale (if unique) to disability, health condition, and quality of life report in patients with neck and low back pain scheduled for spine fusion surgery.

Methods

Factor analysis was used to refine all items within the 2 scales to 4 distinct factors: (1) somatic complaints of the head/neck, (2) somatic complaints of the gastrointestinal symptom, (3) pain beliefs and fear, and (4) self perception of serious problems. Each factor was assessed for concurrent validity with other well-established tools including the Deyo comorbidity index, the Short Form (SF)-36 mental and physical component subscales, and the Oswestry and Neck Disability Indices (ODI/NDI).

Results

The PBSI was fairly to moderately correlated with assessment tools of quality of life (SF-36) and disability assessment (ODI/NDI). Some of the items in the factor 1 from the MSPQ were slightly associated with the Deyo comorbidity index but not with the ODI/NDI.

Conclusions

The items from the MSPQ failed to associate with measures of quality of life and disability and thus may provide only marginal value when assessing the multidimensional aspects associated with neck and low back pain. The PBSI has moderate correlation with disability assessments. Neither tool was found to strongly correlate with disability measures or with SF-36 scales (mental and physical component subscales). Additional tools may be needed to further identify the dimensions associated with chronic pain patients.     

Psychometric Properties of a Scale to Assess the Severity of Bathing Disability

Gill TM, Gahbauer EA, Van Ness PH. Psychometric properties of a scale to assess the severity of bathing disability.

Objective

To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a new bathing disability scale.

Design

Reliability and validity study.

Setting

General community.

Participants

Two subsets of community-living older persons, selected from an ongoing longitudinal study, who had some degree of bathing disability or were at increased risk for bathing disability, as determined during a comprehensive assessment at 36 (N=199) and 54 (N=213) months, respectively.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

The bathing disability scale was administered at 36, 54, and 72 months, and changes in scores were assessed between 36 and 54 months and 54 and 72 months, respectively, for the 2 subsets of participants. Convergent construct validity was evaluated by comparisons with changes in activity of daily living (ADL) disability, mobility disability, and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Discriminative construct validity was determined by comparisons according to age and physical frailty. Responsiveness was evaluated by comparisons between participants who had and had not been hospitalized and, subsequently, by plotting correlations according to the timing of these hospitalizations.

Results

The test-retest reliability was high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient=0.76 (95% confidence interval=0.59−0.94). The internal consistency reliability was excellent with Cronbach α=0.91−0.97. Changes in scores on the bathing disability scale were positively correlated with changes in scores in ADL and mobility disability and inversely correlated with changes in scores on the SPPB. A greater decline in scores was observed among the oldest old and those who were physically frail, but these differences did not consistently achieve statistical significance. The scale was responsive to the occurrence and/or timing of intervening hospitalizations.

Conclusions

The bathing disability scale is reliable, valid, and responsive and may be suitable for use in clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to enhance independent bathing.     

Calibration of an item pool for assessing the disability associated with foot pain: an application of item response theory to the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index

Objective

To analyze the relative validity of the 17-item Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI) using graded response item response theory analysis (G-IRT).

Design

The design of the study involved a survey instrument validation.

Participants/Patients

A total of 682 respondents with a history of foot pain in the last month.

Methods

Factor analysis and G-IRT were used to analyze the dimensionality and relative validity of each scale item.

Results

Exploratory factor analysis yielded a two-factor solution. G-IRT resulted in the removal of one of the original 17 items from the MFPDI. Analyses revealed that six of the nine foot and ankle function items of the MFPDI demonstrated excellent discrimination. For the seven pain and appearance items, only one item demonstrated excellent discrimination, the remaining demonstrated moderate discrimination.

Conclusion

G-IRT was successful in outlining selected items representative of disability and pain and appearance. By reducing the MFPDI to 16 items, the Modified MFPDI is multidimensional and is associated with the underlying construct of activity related foot and ankle disability and pain and appearance. By reducing the MFPDI to 16 items, a clinician can be confident that the outcome instrument accurately represents the latent construct of disability and pain and appearance.     

A Study of Bone Mineral Density in Adults With Disability

Smith ÉM, Comiskey CM, Carroll ÁM. A study of bone mineral density in adults with disability.

Objectives

To examine prevalence of low bone mineral density (BMD) among adults with disability, using World Health Organization diagnostic categories.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

National Rehabilitation Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Participants

Patients (N=255; 178 men, 77 women) who were disabled for at least 3 months because of acquired brain injury, spinal cord injury, other neurologic condition, or lower-limb amputation.

Interventions

None.

Main Outcome Measures

Laboratory investigations including intact parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD), and sex hormones; and BMD of lumbar spine and at least 1 hip, measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and expressed as T scores and z scores.

Results

Mean age ± SD of participants was 48.7±15.6 years. Vitamin D deficiency, 25-OHD level 50nmol/L or less, occurred in 154 (62.9%); insufficiency, a level between 51 and 72nmol/L, occurred in 36 (14.7%). Based on T scores, 108 participants (42.4%) had osteopenia, and 60 (23.5%) had osteoporosis. A z score of −1 or less but more than −2 occurred in 76 (29.8%); a further 52 (20.4%) had a z score of −2 or less. On multiple linear regression analysis, ambulatory status and duration of disability were independent predictors of BMD at neck of femur (β=.152, P=.007; β=−.191, P=.001, respectively) and total proximal femur (β=.170, P=.001; β=−.216, P<.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Osteopenia and osteoporosis are very common in adults with disability participating in rehabilitation, compared with the general young adult population. Duration since onset of disability and mobility status are independent predictors of BMD at the hip. Bone health monitoring should form part of the long-term follow-up in adults with newly acquired disabilities.     

Construct Validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation Lifting Tests in Construction Workers on Sick Leave as a Result of Musculoskeletal Disorders

Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Construct validity of functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in construction workers on sick leave as a result of musculoskeletal disorders.

Objectives

To assess the construct (discriminative and convergent) validity of 5 Ergo-Kit (EK) functional capacity evaluation (FCE) lifting tests in construction workers on sick leave as a result of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).

Design

Cross sectional within-subject design.

Setting

Occupational health service for the construction industry.

Participants

Male construction workers (N=72) on 6-week sick leave as a result of MSDs.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

After being assessed on 5 EK FCE lifting tests, participants were asked to complete the Von Korff questionnaire on pain intensity and disability as a result of MSDs and the instrument for disability risk assessing the risk for work disability. Discriminative validity was evaluated by comparing the results of the EK FCE lifting test scores between the 2 groups of participants based on the instrument for disability risk scores (high risk for work disability compared with low risk for work disability). Convergent validity was evaluated by assessing the associations between the results of the EK FCE lifting tests and Von Korff questionnaire self-reported pain intensity and disability as a result of MSDs.

Results

The hypothesized differences between both instrument for disability risk groups on the 5 EK FCE lifting tests were found in the expected direction but were not statistically significant (1 test exhibited a trend). Pearson correlation coefficients showed a poor convergent validity between the scores of the Von Korff questionnaire and the EK FCE lifting tests (-.29≤r≤.05).

Conclusions

Poor construct validity of the 5 EK lifting tests was found: discriminative validity was not statistically established, and convergent validity with self-reported pain intensity and disability was poor.     

Utility of the Oswestry Disability Index for studies of back pain related disability in nurses: Evaluation of psychometric and measurement properties

Background

Disability due to back pain in nurses results in reduced productivity, work absenteeism and attrition from the nursing workforce internationally. Consistent use of outcome measures is needed in intervention studies to enable meta-analyses that determine efficacy of back pain preventive programs.

Objective

This study investigated the psychometric and measurement properties of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in nursing students to determine its suitability for assessing back pain related disability in intervention studies.

Methods

Bachelor of Nursing students were recruited. Test-retest reliability and the ability of the ODI to discriminate between individuals with serious and non-serious back pain were investigated. The measurement error of the ODI was examined with the minimal detectable change at the 90% confidence level (MDC₉₀).

Results

Student nurses (n = 214) had a low mean ODI score of 8.8 ± 7.4%. Participants with serious back pain recorded higher scores than the rest of the cohort (p < 0.05). Test-retest reliability examined in 33 individuals was ICC = 0.88 (95%CI 0.77-0.94). The MDC₉₀ = 6%, and 36% of nursing students scored below the MDC₉₀ indicating the tool had limited ability to detect longitudinal change in disability in this population.

Conclusion

Data from this and previous studies demonstrate that the measurement properties of the ODI are inappropriate for studying back pain related disability in nurses. The ODI is not recommended for back pain intervention studies in the nursing population and an alternative tool that is sensitive to lower levels of disability must be determined.     

Can four key psychosocial risk factors for chronic pain and disability (Yellow Flags) be modified by a pain management programme?: A pilot study

Objectives

To identify the extent to which an adapted pain management programme is successful in modifying pain beliefs, psychological distress, locus of control and self-efficacy using both qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Design

Prospective, observational study with questionnaires at baseline and following completion of a pain management programme.

Setting

Outpatient pain management programme in a district general hospital.

Participants

Fifteen participants experiencing chronic pain, referred from pain and rheumatology clinics within the hospital.

Outcome measures

Pain beliefs, self-efficacy, locus of control and psychological distress.

Results

Wilcoxon signed ranks tests demonstrated significant improvements in pain beliefs, self-efficacy and psychological distress. However, changes in locus of control were not found to be significant. The qualitative data supported these findings.

Conclusions

The pilot study suggested that the pain management programme successfully modified three out of four of the psychosocial risk factors (Yellow Flags) in a population with established pain and disability. A larger scale project replicating this pilot study including a comparison group, and further research to assess the extent to which modifying Yellow Flags generalises to affect quality of life and disability, are underway.     

Measuring fatigue in persons with spinal cord injury

Anton HA, Miller WC, Townson AF. Measuring fatigue in persons with spinal cord injury.

Objective

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design

A 2-week methodologic study was conducted to assess the internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity of the FSS.

Setting

A tertiary spinal cord rehabilitation facility.

Participants

Forty-eight community-living subjects at least 1 year post-SCI with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade A or B SCI and no medical conditions causing fatigue. The sample was predominantly male (n=31 [65%]) with tetraplegia (n=26 [54%]) and ASIA grade A injuries (n=30 [63%]). The average duration since injury was 14.9 years.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

The ASIA Impairment Scale, the FSS, a visual analog scale for fatigue (VAS-F), the vitality scale of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).

Results

Mean FSS score ± standard deviation at baseline was 4.4±1.4, with 54% (n=26) scoring greater than 4. The internal consistency of the FSS was excellent (Cronbach α=.89). Two-week test-retest reliability was adequate (intraclass correlation coefficient, .84; 95% confidence interval, .74-.90). The magnitude of the relationship was as hypothesized for the VAS-F (r=.67) and CES-D (r=.58) and lower than hypothesized for the vitality subscore (r=−.48) of the SF-36.

Conclusions

The FSS has acceptable reliability with regard to internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity in persons with motor complete SCI.     

Validity of the Fingertip-To-Floor Test and Straight Leg Raising Test in Patients With Acute and Subacute Low Back Pain: A Comparison by Sex and Radicular Pain

Ekedahl KH, Jönsson B, Frobell RB. Validity of the fingertip-to-floor test and straight leg raising test in patients with acute and subacute low back pain: a comparison by sex and radicular pain.

Objective

To use self-reported disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ]) to assess the criterion validity of straight leg raising (SLR) test and flexion range of motion (ROM) (fingertip-to-floor test) before and after stratification by sex and presence/absence of radicular pain.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Outpatient physical therapy clinic.

Participants

Subjects with acute/subacute low back pain with (n=40) and without (n=35) radicular pain.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

We examined the relationship between RMDQ (reference variable) and SLR test and fingertip-to-floor test. The sample was stratified by presence/absence of radicular pain (categorized by the dichotomous slump test).

Results

In the entire sample, fair correlations were found between both physical impairment tests (ie, SLR test and flexion ROM) and self-reported disability (.27<r>.44). After stratification by sex, the correlation between RMDQ and flexion ROM and between RMDQ and nonside-specific SLR test increased in women but decreased in men. In those with radicular pain, good correlations were found between RMDQ and flexion ROM (r=.68 for men and r=.70 for women), and moderate correlation was found between the RMDQ and SLR tests of the affected side in women (r=.60), but only fair correlation was found between the RMDQ and SLR tests of the affected side in men (r=.28).

Conclusions

After stratification by sex and presence/absence of radicular pain, the present study supports a good validity of the fingertip-to-floor test for both men and women with radicular pain. The SLR test, however, was of less value as an indicator of self-reported disability after stratification, especially for men.     

Measurement properties of the pressure biofeedback unit in the evaluation of transversus abdominis muscle activity: a systematic review

Background

Measurements from pressure biofeedback units (PBUs) can be used to evaluate the activity of the transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle indirectly. These measurements can classify patients or monitor the progress of treatment programmes for people with low back pain.

Objective

To systematically review studies on the measurement properties of PBUs for the assessment of TrA activity.

Data sources

Eligible studies were identified through searches of PUBMED, CINAHL and BIREME (1990 to 2009). In addition, hand searches of journals and citation tracking were performed.

Study selection

Full-text studies involving any type of clinimetric tests of PBU measurement for the assessment of TrA activity were selected.

Data extraction

Two independent reviewers selected the studies, extracted the data and assessed methodological quality.

Data synthesis

Due to the heterogeneity of study designs and statistical analysis, it was not possible to pool the data for a meta-analysis.

Results

Six studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were typically of low quality and recruited healthy subjects rather than patients with low back pain. The studies found moderate to good reproducibility (intra-class correlation coefficients from 0.47 to 0.82) and acceptable construct validity (intra-class correlation coefficients from 0.48 to 0.90).

Conclusions

The current evidence about the measurement properties of PBUs for the assessment of TrA activity is mainly based on studies with suboptimal designs, and the findings from these studies are likely to be overly optimistic. The most important clinical questions about the measurement properties of PBUs for the assessment of TrA activity are yet to be answered.     

Exercise therapy for office workers with nonspecific neck pain: a systematic review

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of various types of exercise for prevention and cure of nonspecific neck pain in office workers.

Methods

Publications between 1980 and April 2010 were systematically searched in various databases (PubMed, CINAHL Plus with full text, The Cochrane Library, Science Direct, PEDro, ProQuest, PsycNet, and Scopus). The following key words were used: neck pain, cervical pain, exercise, strengthening, stretching, endurance, office workers, visual display unit, visual display terminal, and computer users. A hand search of relevant journals was also carried out. Relevant randomized controlled trials were retrieved and assessed for methodological quality by 2 independent reviewers. The strength of the evidence was based on methodological quality and consistency of the results.

Results

Nine randomized controlled trials were included in this review, of which 6 were rated as high-quality studies. No exercise type was identified as being effective in the prevention of nonspecific neck pain in office workers. Strong evidence was found for the effectiveness of muscle strengthening and endurance exercises in treating neck pain. Moderate evidence supported the use of muscle endurance exercise in reducing disability attributed to neck pain.

Conclusion

Literature investigating the efficacy of exercise in office workers with nonspecific neck pain was heterogeneous. Within the limitations, for treatment of neck pain, either muscle strengthening or endurance exercise is recommended, whereas for reduction of pain-related disability, muscle endurance exercise is suggested. Further research is needed before any firm conclusions regarding the most effective exercise programs for office workers can be reached.     

Comparison of three established measures of fear of falling in community-dwelling older adults: Psychometric testing

Background

Several approaches have emerged for measuring self-reported fear of falling. A comparison of measurement scales’ psychometric properties is needed for researchers to choose the proper scale for their study.

Objectives

To compare the psychometric properties of the Falling Efficacy Scale (FES), the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) and the Geriatric Fear of Falling Measurement (GFFM).

Design

Secondary analysis using baseline and 8-week data from a randomized, controlled trial on fall and fear of falling prevention.

Settings

Rural area northeast of Taiwan with assessments conducted in participants’ homes.

Participants

Population-based sample of 168 community-dwelling older adults aged 60 and older.

Methods

During a home visit, a nurse administered the Tinetti Mobility Scale, and asked about the FES, ABC, GFFM, WHOQOL, falls, chronic illnesses and medicines taken.

Results

Baseline internal consistency measured using Cronbach's alpha was 0.98 for the FES, 0.96 for the ABC and 0.88 for the GFFM. Baseline concurrent validity between the FES, ABC and GFFM measured using a correlation coefficient was 0.88 (FES vs. ABC), −0.55 (FES vs. GFFM), and −0.57 (ABC vs. GFFM), respectively, p < .001. All three instruments scores were significantly correlated at baseline with physical performance tests and WHOQOL. The GFFM demonstrated responsiveness to change at 8 weeks.

Conclusions

The FES, ABC and GFFM demonstrated strong internal consistency reliability. The GFFM had stronger associations with physical and psychosocial functioning and may be more appropriate for studies focused on improving all aspects of fear of falling. Both FES and ABC instruments demonstrated ceiling effects, which may explain the lack of responsiveness to change in relatively non-frail older community-dwelling adults. Instruments sensitive to measuring lower levels of fear of falling are needed to capture the full range of this phenomenon in this population.     

Translation, transcultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire in German

Objectives

To translate the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) from French to German, to undertake transcultural adaptation, and to test reliability and validity.

Design

German translation according to sequential forward and backward translation approach, and transcultural adaptation by a consensus process. Validity testing was assessed in a cross-sectional study.

Setting

Outpatient physiotherapy department of a multidisciplinary clinic.

Participants

One hundred and twenty-three outpatients with musculoskeletal health disorders after completion of outpatient physiotherapy.

Main outcome measures

Test-retest reliability was quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2,1), and Chronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency of the questionnaire. A factor analysis was performed to investigate the factor structure of the questionnaire. No comparable gold-standard measurement of patient satisfaction was retrieved. The construct validity was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between the most indicative item and the global scale excluding this item.

Results

Translation and transcultural adaptation according to international guidelines did not produce any content or language problems. For 23 test-retest questionnaires, the ICC ranged from 0.74 (Item 10) to 0.92 (Item 11), corresponding to a Chronbach's alpha ranging from 0.85 to 0.96. On Item 12, correlations of 0.53-0.83 were obtained for the subscores and 0.79 for the total score. High values were obtained for content validity and face validity.

Conclusions

The PSQ in German proved to be good in terms of practical application, comprehensibility, internal consistency, reliability and validity. It is suitable for use to record patient satisfaction after outpatient physiotherapy in German-speaking areas.     

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Manipulation With Mobilization for Recent Onset Neck Pain

Leaver AM, Maher CG, Herbert RD, Latimer J, McAuley JH, Jull G, Refshauge KM. A randomized controlled trial comparing manipulation with mobilization for recent onset neck pain.

Objective

To determine whether neck manipulation is more effective for neck pain than mobilization.

Design

Randomized controlled trial with blind assessment of outcome.

Setting

Primary care physiotherapy, chiropractic, and osteopathy clinics in Sydney, Australia.

Participants

Patients (N=182) with nonspecific neck pain less than 3 months in duration and deemed suitable for treatment with manipulation by the treating practitioner.

Interventions

Participants were randomly assigned to receive treatment with neck manipulation (n=91) or mobilization (n=91). Patients in both groups received 4 treatments over 2 weeks.

Main Outcome Measure

The number of days taken to recover from the episode of neck pain.

Results

The median number of days to recovery of pain was 47 in the manipulation group and 43 in the mobilization group. Participants treated with neck manipulation did not experience more rapid recovery than those treated with neck mobilization (hazard ratio=.98; 95% confidence interval, .66-1.46).

Conclusions

Neck manipulation is not appreciably more effective than mobilization. The use of neck manipulation therefore cannot be justified on the basis of superior effectiveness.     

Obesity influences transitional states of disability in older adults with knee pain

Rejeski WJ, Ip EH, Marsh AP, Zhang Q, Miller ME. Obesity influences transitional states of disability in older adults with knee pain.

Objectives

This study employed relatively new statistical methods to understand how many states are needed to describe disability in older adults with knee pain, describe the relative probability of transitioning between states over time, and examine whether obesity influences the probability of transitioning between states.

Design

Prospective epidemiologic study of older adults with knee pain.

Setting

Community.

Participants

The participants, 245 women and 235 men, were 65 years or older, had chronic knee pain on most days, and had difficulty with at least 1 mobility-related activity caused by knee pain.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

The primary instrument, the Pepper Assessment Tool for Disability, evaluated self-reported difficulty with mobility, basic activities of daily living (ADLs), and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs).

Results

The Hidden Markov Model yielded 6 states reflecting changes in mobility, ADLs, and IADLs. There is evidence that loss in more demanding mobility-related activities such as stair climbing is an early sign for the onset of disability and that functional deficits in the lower extremities are critical to the early loss of ADLs. Overall the trend is for older adults to experience greater progression than regression and for obesity to be important in understanding severe states of disability.

Conclusions

These data provide a strong rationale for characterizing disability on a continuum and underscore the fluid nature of disability in older adults. As expected, lower-extremity function plays a key role in the disablement process; obesity is also particularly relevant to understanding severe states of disability.