Latex allergy: a challenge for anaesthetists

First reported in 1979, anaesthetists now encounter more and more patients with latex allergy. Several risk groups prone to develop this allergy have been identified. A thorough preoperative interview is necessary to detect high-risk patients. For them, the perioperative period is very dangerous because of the many possibilities of contact with latex-containing materials. There is no cure for latex allergy. Absolute avoidance of contact with latex is the only safe way to treat those who belong to a risk group or who are already allergic. The diagnosis of latex allergy must be kept in mind in every case of perioperative anaphylaxis, even if the patient does not belong to a risk group. In the future, desensitization will probably be useful in helping patients with latex allergy.     

2009 Japanese Society of Latex Allergy guidelines for the safe management of latex allergy

Latex allergy is an IgE-mediated reaction to natural latex antigen. Operating room equipment frequently includes medical devices, such as surgical gloves, intravenous lines, and urinary catheters, which are made from latex or contain latex. These products can trigger an allergic reaction that can result in anaphylactic shock. Removal of natural rubber and latex-containing products from the operating room and avoidance of external and internal exposure of patients to latex antigen will prevent such allergic reactions. Updated guidelines for the safe management of latex allergy were published in 2009 by the Japanese Society of Latex Allergy. The previous guidelines regarding this topic were published in 2006. The new guidelines consist of 11 chapters that deal with background, exposure to latex antigen and development of sensitization, high-risk groups, natural rubber products, allergic reactions triggered by natural rubber products, diagnosis, latex-fruit syndrome, countermeasures and treatments in emergencies, prevention and safe management in the hospital, countermeasures in daily life, and limits for application of the guidelines. We had a case that required management according to the 2009 guidelines. A 49-year-old male doctor with a history of allergy to latex gloves was scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general and epidural anesthesia for recurrent, acute cholecystitis. The anesthesia and operation were performed uneventfully with latex-free medical devices and machines in a latex-safe environment in the operating room under the new guidelines. Safe anesthetic management under the 2009 guidelines should be available for all operations in Japan on patients with latex allergy.     

Latex allergy: a life-threatening epidemic for scientists,healthcare personnel,and their patients

Latex allergy has become a global epidemic, affecting patients, healthcare workers, and scientific personnel. Today, the incidence of latex allergy in healthcare and scientific personnel varies from 17-36%, costing billions of dollars annually to treat. Consequently, it is the purpose of this special report to describe the etiology, immunology, diagnosis, management, prevention, and litigation of cases of latex allergy. The latex allergy epidemic has been attributed to the dramatic increase in glove usage following the establishment of Universal Precautions by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Because of the latex allergy epidemic, every hospital and scientific research facility should institute a comprehensive emergency treatment program for latex allergic patients, latex-safe areas in their facilities, and a prevention program that includes the wide use of latex-free gloves and the absence of powdered gloves throughout these facilities.     

Latex allergy in subjects who had undergone multiple surgical procedures for bladder exstrophy: relationship with clinical intervention and atopic diseases

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of latex sensitization in a group of patients with bladder exstrophy, and to determine the role of associated risk factors, e.g. atopy, and the number and duration of surgical and anaesthetic procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 17 patients (15 children and two young adults) affected by bladder exstrophy who had undergone multiple surgical procedures. Skin-prick tests and specific immunoglobulin-E (IgE) assays against latex, food allergens cross-reacting with latex and inhalant allergens were carried out. RESULTS: Twelve patients showed latex sensitization and five showed symptoms related to latex exposure, the most common of which was contact urticaria (four of the symptomatic patients). Intraoperative anaphylactic reaction had led to life-threatening events in only one child. Latex-specific IgE determined both by the prick test and assay was positive in all those with symptoms. Specific IgEs against inhalant allergens and foods were present in four of five symptomatic patients. In the seven sensitized patients with no clinical symptoms, the assay was positive in all, while the skin-prick test was positive only in four; specific IgEs against inhalant allergens were present in three of the seven. In the five patients not allergic and not latex-sensitized, only one showed allergic sensitization against grass pollen and mite allergen. None of the children without latex antibodies had symptoms of latex allergy. Symptomatic patients had a undergone significantly more hours of surgery, more cystography and had used intermittent catheterization for longer than those with no symptoms. CONCLUSION: A third of patients with bladder exstrophy showed latex symptoms and another third had latex sensitization. Multiple surgical procedures and atopy play a major role in the development of latex hypersensitivity     

Allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber, neoprene in compression stockings

Compression stockings are used for patients under general anesthesia to prevent occurrence of deep venous thrombosis. We report a case of allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber, neoprene in compression stockings. A 53-year-old house wife had a history of sensitivity like skin eruption and disstasis to rubber products such as rubber band. Left nephrectomy for rupture of renal angiomyolipoma was scheduled under general and epidural anesthesia. Further examination for gum allergy was not performed before the operation, although latex allergy was suspected. The operation was performed uneventfully under latex-safe environment in the operating room under guideline for latex allergy. Postoperatively, ringed edematous erythema and wheal occurred in her bilateral thighs compressed with the upper part of compression stockings. The skin symptoms continued for more than four days. After disappearance of the skin symptoms, she was discharged from the hospital on the ninth day after the operation. Synthetic rubber, neoprene, in the upper part of compression stockings to prevent slipping down might cause allergic contact dermatitis. We should take care of occurrence of allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber, neoprene in compression stockings in patients with rubber allergy.     

Anaphylactic reactions during cesarean section

Sensitization to latex seems to occur more frequently in women than in men. Obstetric and gynecological surgical procedures have recently been shown to be a common setting for latex anaphylaxis. We analyzed all the cases of anaphylactic reactions during 1240 cesarean sections in 2004; the patients were questioned for risk factors and underwent allergy testing for drugs and latex. Four patients had anaphylaxis under spinal anesthesia and in all cases it was due to latex allergy. Reported symptoms included facial edema, profuse sweating, itching, generalized erythematous rash and hypotension. Only one patient manifested a severe reaction which included bronchospasm, dyspnea, tachypnea and anaphylactic shock, requiring orotracheal intubation and epinephrine. Our data showed a high incidence (1:310) of intraoperative latex anaphylactic reactions in the one-year study period. This may be related to the very specific population (all women) in a very specific setting (obstetrics). To prevent anaphylactic reactions during obstetric surgery it is important to identify potential risk factors to include, for example atopy, adverse reactions to foods and latex items. If latex allergy is confirmed or strongly suspected, patients should be managed in a latex-safe environment. Premedication with antihistamines and steroids might be useful to further reduce the risk. After the delivery, specific desensitization may represent a good therapeutic option.     

Anesthetic management of a patient with latex allergy diagnosed preoperatively

Since the first report in 1979, the number of patients with latex allergy has progressively increased. We experienced an anesthetic management of a 3 year-old child who underwent the repair of anal atresia. The first operation was performed in newborn period. After the surgery, the patient developed skin rash and the loss of consciousness every time anal irrigation was made with latex-containing catheter. Latex-allergy was diagnosed at the age of 3 years, with the positive skin test by latex extract. It took enormous time and efforts to find out the possibility of latex-contamination in a wide variety of medical equipments and supplies to prevent allergic reaction during perioperative period. In this patient, perioperative cause was uneventful. It is suggested that preoperative preparation is essential and caution should be also paid to prevent allergic reaction in daily life.     

Natural latex allergy. Primary and secondary prevention in work environment

AT RISK GROUPS: The incidence of latex hypersensitivity of latex hypersensitivity has increased over the last decade. The main at-risk groups for developing latex allergy are: health care workers and employees working in latex industries, patients with atopic diathesis and subjects with repeated surgical procedures during childhood. SENSITIZATION: The use of cornstarch powder gloves can sensitize healthy subjects and exacerbate symptoms of allergic patients as the powder spreads the latex allergens into the environment. PRACTICAL ATTITUDE: We propose here some practical recommendations for prevention, both for the general population and for allergic subjects.     

Latexallergie Perioperatives Management in der Anästhesie und Kardioanästhesie

The frequency of perioperative allergic responses to latex has markedly increased over the last 10 years. High risk groups to develop sensitivity to latex include healthcare workers, workers in the latex industry, children suffering from congenital malformations such as spina bifida or urogenital deformities and patients who have undergone multiple surgical procedures. During surgery, patients have contact to a variety of products containing latex. To prevent anaphylactic reactions, all hospitals have to develop strategies to identify and manage patients sensitised to latex or belonging to high risk groups. The aim of this paper is to describe safe perioperative management in a latex-free environment.     

Latex allergy--a clinical perspective

Latex allergy has been increasingly recognized in the past 6 years. Defined risk groups are health-care workers, spina bifida children, and possibly food allergy patients. Powdered latex gloves and latex barium enema tips are products most commonly associated with allergy. Clinically, patients present with contact urticaria, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, and anaphylaxis. At least 15 deaths are reported to have occurred because of latex allergic reactions. Severe occupational latex allergy can result in removal of the affected individual from the workplace. This will have important cost implications. The only presently available treatment of latex allergy is avoidance.     

Latex allergy in children: modalities and prevention

Allergic or immediate hypersensitivity reactions to latex have been reported in children with increasing frequency in the past. The reported prevalence varies greatly depending upon the population studied and the methods used to detect sensitization. Children's subpopulations at particular risk include: atopics, individuals with spina bifida, children undergoing surgical procedure during the neonatal period and individuals who required frequent surgical instrumentations. Latex allergy is also an important medical issue, particularly for healthcare personnel. Sensitization mainly occurs by wound or mucosal contact with latex devices during surgery or by inhalation of airborne allergens released from powdered latex gloves. Regarding diagnosis, the medical history, skin prick test and search for specific serum IgE are crucial but cost effective. The development of a guide listing latex-containing drugs is essential for the primary prevention of allergic reactions. Immunotherapy or specific premedication seems not effective in preventing the risk of anaphylaxis during the perioperative course. The most effective strategy to decrease the incidence of latex sensitization is complete avoidance. This strategy is efficient in patients and also in health care workers and has been applied since 2002 in our pediatric surgical hospital. One of major problem with the latex-free gloves was that surgeons find them considerably more difficult to work with. But today, manufacturers made considerable effort and free-latex gloves with an equal tactile sensation than the latex-gloves are now available. The extra cost of free latex gloves is well counterbalanced as allergen test, long stay hospital for allergic reaction, and worker's compensation are no longer needed. Since the introduction of this program in our institution, no allergic reaction to latex has been reported in 25000 anesthetized children or with the health care workers.     

Hetastarch allergy and positive latex radioallergosorbent test in a patient suffering cardiovascular decompensation during multiple perioperative periods

The cause of sudden cardiovascular collapse in the perioperative period can be elusive. Allergy may be overlooked as a cause. When allergy is considered, latex is often suspected. Because hetastarch is frequently used in situations involving hypovolemia and hypotension, and because allergic reactions to it are rare, it may be overlooked as a possible allergen. We report a case of a patient suffering cardiovascular decompensation during four nonconsecutive perioperative periods before it was determined that she was allergic to hetastarch. She also had a very highly positive latex radioallergosorbent test, suggesting a latex allergy.     

Latex-related allergy in hemodialysis patients

Abstract

Background: Incidence of allergic reactions is increased in hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, the prevalence of latex allergy is not exactly known in HD patients. The aim of this present study is to determine the prevalence of latex allergy in HD patients. Methods: A total of 205 adult HD patients were included in the study. Questionnaires were completed during patient interviews, and their consents were provided. Latex prick test and latex specific IgE test (HY-TEC, K82) were performed. Mean age of the patients was 52?±?14 (25–79) years, and 61% was male. Mean dialysis duration was 38 months, and 21% of them were diabetics. Only five patients had allergic complaints in their histories, and none of them had severe anaphylaxis history. Latex prick test was positive in two patients. Latex specific IgE test was positive in five patients. Overall latex sensitivity was defined as 3.4%. Conclusion: No increased prevalence in latex allergy was determined in HD patients. Latex allergy incidence may be increased in atopic HD patients. Therefore, the use of latex products should be avoided as much as possible especially in atopic HD patients.     

A case of latex allergy caused by hypersensitivity to the latex-containing facemask

We experienced anesthetic management of a 2 year-old girl with Pierre-Robin syndrome. She had received respiratory support for 6 months from the birth. As soon as we induced general anesthesia, she had a skin rash. We suspected that this rash was caused by hypersensitivity to the latex-containing facemask. We stopped anesthesia and postponed operation. After a month, operation was performed under general anesthesia using latex-free anesthetic circuit and equipments. Perioperative course was uneventful. Since the first report in 1979, the number of patients with latex allergy has progressively been increasing. It has been reported that latex allergy occurs in persons considered at high risk for latex allergy including patients with spina bifida, urogenital abnormalities and atopic dermatitis, and in health care workers and rubber industry workers. If patients suspected of having latex allergy undergo surgical procedures, anesthesiologists must check patients' past history and possibility of chronic exposure to latex products. In these cases, preoperative preparation is essential and thorough precaution should also be taken to avoid life-threatening allergic reaction.     

Latex allergy in children with oesophageal atresia

Background: Latex allergy is frequently found in children and patients with spina bifida and urogenital abnormalities and have been considered at risk for latex sensitization. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of latex sensitization in patients with oesophageal atresia and undergoing three or more surgical procedures and to identify possible risk factors in the process of latex sensitization. Methods: A total of 20 patients were analysed: 19 boys and one girl. The oesophageal atresias were as follows: type I in three children, type II in two and type III in 15 children. Surgical and anaesthetic procedures, intensive care management, age, type of oesophageal atresia, associated congenital malformations, Waterston and Montreal prognostic classifications were considered as risk factors that may be implicated in the process of sensitization. Results: Five patients (25%) were considered sensitized to latex (group 1) and 15 (75%) nonsensitized (group 2). Among the five sensitized patients, three reported clinical reactions to latex, while the other two presented only specific IgE sensitization. The number of operations, the total hours of surgery, the number of drainages, the total days of drainage, the total days of central venous catheter were significantly greater in group 1 than in group 2. Both of the highest risk oesophageal atresia classes (Waterston C and Montreal II) were related to latex allergy. Conclusions: Oesophageal atresia, especially in cases of prolonged management, must be considered as a risk for the development of latex allergy.     

Sublingual desensitization: a new approach to latex allergy problem

The prevalence of latex allergy has rapidly increased. Clinical manifestations range from contact urticaria-angioedema and rhinoconjunctivitis to more severe bronchial asthma and anaphylactic shock. The only effective therapy is desensitization. We studied 24 patients allergic to latex: 12 of them underwent a rush (4-day) sublingual desensitization to latex, performed by putting increasing doses of latex extract under the patients' tongues for 3 min every 20 min, followed by a maintenance therapy. The other 12 patients were considered controls. The sublingual rush desensitization protocol was successfully completed in all patients with no side effects. After 3 mo, all patients underwent an allergological evaluation, which showed a significant improvement of symptoms scores after challenges in the treated group as compared with the controls. All the desensitized patients can now wear latex gloves and undergo medical procedures without any symptoms. IMPLICATIONS: We present 12 cases of latex allergy in patients who underwent desensitization by a sublingual exposure protocol. This study provides evidence that a safe therapeutic approach to latex allergy is possible.     

Latex anaphylaxis in a myasthenic child undergoing thymectomy

Anaphylactic shock occurred in a 9-year-old myasthenic boy after induction of anesthesia for thymectomy. Resuscitation was successful. Subsequent skin testing identified latex as the cause. Although the patient was not in a high-risk group for latex allergy, detailed questioning confirmed that sensitivity had developed during repeated exposures in previous anesthesia and dental care. Six months later, after taking steroids and antihistaminic drugs prophylactically and avoiding all latex-containing products, the boy underwent uncomplicated thymectomy.The possibility of latex allergy should be borne in mind when dealing with patients previously exposed to repeated medical care. Adequate, latex-free equipment should be available in operating rooms to deal with patients who are allergic to latex.     

Berufsbedingte Latexallergie

Avoiding powdered latex gloves is generally accepted as being an important way for health service employees to avoid latex-linked allergies affecting the skin and respiratory tract. A questionnaire study was performed to test whether this preventive measure would also be adequate to prevent symptoms in employees with an existing allergy. Using a standardised questionnaire, 329 health service employees with occupational latex allergy were asked about their quality of life, periods without contact with allergens and symptoms related to allergens. At the time when the questionnaire was administered the symptoms were declining markedly. Powdered latex gloves were avoided by all subjects. Seventy-seven per cent of subjects with skin allergy and 68% of subjects with respiratory tract allergy had no allergic symptoms. We conclude therefore that avoiding latex gloves is also an effective preventive measure for insured subjects with existing latex allergy.     

Intraoperative anaphylactic reaction due to latex hypersensitivity.

Severe anaphylactic reaction secondary to latex allergy has lately been recognized and reported especially in individuals with spina bifida. We report a case of severe intraoperative anaphylactic reaction due to latex allergy. Preoperative testing for latex allergy may be helpful in determining latex allergy. We suggest a preoperative management protocol for patients who are thought to have latex allergy. An increased awareness to latex allergy will help avoid this potentially catastrophic event.     

Latex allergy: a strategy for management

Latex is a ubiquitous part of life today. It is a constituent of many household products and medical devices, although not always obvious on examination. The increase in incidence of potentially life-threatening allergic reactions to latex has been a cause for mounting concern over recent years. Although there have been recent reviews of the general problem of latex allergy, there is little advice available to anaesthetists on how to develop an effective strategy to implement within their own hospitals. The aim of this article is to improve awareness of latex allergy and by describing the development of our strategy to identify and safely manage those at risk in the peri-operative period, facilitate the process for other departments.