Effects of the angiotensin II receptor blockers telmisartan versus valsartan on the circadian variation of blood pressure: impact on the early morning period

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring has shown that BP typically declines by 10% to 20% during sleep and increases fairly rapidly in the early morning period. Because the early morning period has been associated with both loss of hypertension control and increased rates of myocardial infarction and stroke, there has been interest in evaluating the effects of antihypertensive therapy at this particular time of the day. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of a long half-life (telmisartan, 24 h) versus intermediate half-life (valsartan, 6 to 9 h) on early morning BP in two scenarios: after an active dose and after a missed dose of each agent. METHODS: The study was a double-blind, randomized trial that compared telmisartan (40 to 80 mg once daily) versus valsartan (80 to 160 mg once daily) on early morning BP in 490 patients with hypertension. Ambulatory BP recordings were performed at baseline after a placebo period and again after 6 and 8 weeks of double-blind therapy in a randomized cross-over design. The monitoring patients received either an active dose or a placebo dose (to mimic a "missed" dose). The primary study end point was reduction in the BP in the early morning period (last 6 h of the dosing period). RESULTS: After the active dose, telmisartan reduced the BP during the last 6 h of the dosing period by -11/-7.6 +/- 0.8/0.6 mm Hg compared to -8.7/-5.8 +/- 0.8/0.6 mm Hg on valsartan (P = .02 for systolic BP and.01 for diastolic BP). On the day of the missed dose, telmisartan reduced the early morning BP by -9.0/-6.3 +/- 0.7/0.6 mm Hg versus -7.4/-5.1 +/- 0.7/0.4 mm Hg on valsartan (P = .09 for systolic BP and.06 for diastolic BP). On the day of the missed dose, reductions in 24-h average BP for the two antihypertensive agents were -10.3/-6.9 mm Hg for telmisartan versus -8.7/-5.9 mm Hg for valsartan (P = .06 for systolic BP and.056 for diastolic BP). CONCLUSIONS: On a day of active therapy, telmisartan lowered both systolic and diastolic BP to a greater extent than valsartan for the last 6 h of the dosing interval. On a day in which a dose was missed, there was a notable trend for greater BP reduction during the latter part of the dosing interval on telmisartan versus valsartan. These results demonstrate that telmisartan achieved a greater effect than valsartan on BP during the early morning period in patients with hypertension.     

The prognostic value of post-exercise blood pressure reduction in patients with hypertensive response during exercise stress test

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive response at peak-exercise and during the recovery phase of exercise stress test (ET) is associated with poor cardiovascular prognosis. We investigated whether decrease in blood pressure (BP) from peak to post-exercise would identify a subgroup at higher cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Eighty-six non-hypertensive patients (0-4 cardiovascular risk factors) with hypertensive reaction at peak-ET (systolic>180 mm Hg and/or diastolic>100 mm Hg) were divided based on BP 5 min after exercise termination into two groups: Normal response (NrmR) (<160/90 mm Hg), Hypertensive response (HypR) (>/=160/90 mm Hg). Five years later the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was assessed for each group. RESULTS: Both groups had similar pre- and peak-exercise BP. However the HypR group had higher post-exercise BP (systolic: 163+/-13 vs. 125+/-14 mm Hg, respectively, p<0.01, and diastolic: 74+/-6 vs. 75+/-4 mm Hg, respectively, p<0.01), smaller decrease in BP after exercise (Delta systolic: 46.9+/-3.1 vs. 73.9+/-3.6 mm Hg, respectively, p<0.01, Delta diastolic: 12.4+/-1.5 vs. 26.5+/-2.2 mm Hg, respectively, p<0.01), and higher post- than pre-exercise BP (Delta systolic: 24.5+/-3.5 vs. -6+/-4.1 mm Hg, respectively, p<0.01, A diastolic: 19+/-2.1 vs. -13+/-2.3 mm Hg, respectively, p<0.01). Five years later, HypR group had higher prevalence of abnormal cholesterol serum level (p<0.01), hypertension (p<0.01) and combined ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease (RR 1.32, 95% CI=1.13-1.54, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: During ET evaluation, it is important to evaluate the BP at 5 min after exercise because reduced BP drop, at this routinely measured point, identifies a subgroup with higher cardiovascular risk.     

Antihypertensive effect of sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate for isolated systolic systemic hypertension in the elderly

A double-blind, randomized trial was performed in 40 patients, mean age (+/- standard deviation) 80 +/- 4 years, with isolated systolic systemic hypertension to evaluate the antihypertensive effect of oral sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN), 20 to 40 mg twice daily, vs placebo. After 12 weeks of treatment, supine systolic blood pressure (BP) decreased from 192 +/- 10 to 162 +/- 12 mm Hg with ISDN (p less than 0.001) and from 189 +/- 10 to 175 +/- 15 mm Hg with placebo (p less than 0.001). On the basis of variance analysis, the decrease in systolic BP was significantly lower with ISDN (27 mm Hg) than with placebo (13 mm Hg). Similar results were observed for supine and erect systolic BP measured at 8 AM and 4 PM, 8 and 12 hours after drug intake. No significant differences in diastolic BP, heart rate or side effects occurred. After the ISDN tapering off-period (2 weeks), systolic BP increased significantly but did not change with placebo. The study provided evidence that in elderly patients with systolic hypertension, sustained-release ISDN induced a selective and sustained decrease in systolic BP, antihypertensive effect was observed 8 and 12 hours after drug administration, and no tolerance phenomenon was noted.     

Effects of celecoxib on ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients on ACE inhibitors

Nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents have been shown to attenuate the antihypertensive efficacy of ACE inhibitors with average increases in systolic blood pressure (BP) of 5 to 10 mm Hg. Less is known about the specific cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors now widely used for the treatment of arthritis. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of celecoxib compared with placebo on 24-hour BP levels in ACE inhibitor-treated patients with hypertension. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial involving 178 men and women (mean age, 53 years) with essential hypertension who were treated and controlled with lisinopril monotherapy (10 to 40 mg daily). Baseline BP values were obtained using 24-hour ambulatory recordings. Patients received either celecoxib, 200 mg twice daily (twice the recommended dose for osteoarthritis) (n=91), or placebo (n=87) for 4 weeks, and changes in the 24-hour BP, body weight, and clinical laboratory parameters were assessed. Mean changes from baseline in the 24-hour systolic and diastolic BP were 2.6/1.5+/-0.9/0.6 mm Hg on celecoxib versus 1.0/0.3+/-1/0.6 mm Hg on placebo (P=0.34 for systolic BP; P=0.45 for diastolic BP). The proportion of patients whose 24-hour BP increased by at least 5, 10, 15, or 20 mm Hg were also similar on celecoxib and placebo. No changes in body weight, serum creatinine, or potassium occurred in either group. Thus, these data demonstrate that high doses of celecoxib have no significant effect on the antihypertensive effect of the ACE inhibitor lisinopril. The placebo-subtracted changes observed in 24-hour BP (1.6/1.2 mm Hg) are less than what has been reported for nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents in ACE inhibitor-treated patients.     

A multicenter double-blind comparative study of rilmenidine and clonidine in 333 hypertensive patients

The efficacy and acceptability of rilmenidine were studied in a double-blind clonidine-controlled multicenter trial; after a 4-week placebo run-in period, patients with supine diastolic blood pressure (BP) between 95 and 115 mm Hg received as monotherapy either rilmenidine or clonidine over 6 weeks. The initial dose (rilmenidine 1 mg/day or clonidine 0.15 mg/day) was doubled (1 mg or 0.15 mg twice a day, respectively) after 2 weeks if diastolic BP remained greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg. Three hundred and thirty-three patients (mean age 57.8 +/- 0.7 years) with a systolic BP of 170.53 +/- 0.92 mm Hg and a diastolic BP of 101.57 +/- 0.30 mm Hg were randomly divided into 2 homogenous groups (rilmenidine, n = 162 and clonidine, n = 171). All patients taking rilmenidine completed the trial. Seventeen patients taking clonidine (10%, p less than 0.01 vs rilmenidine) were withdrawn because of severe side effects. Systolic and diastolic BP were significantly reduced in both groups at every examination (at 2, 4 and 6 weeks). The mean decreases in supine and erect BP were identical in both groups: systolic BP 19 mm Hg and diastolic BP 12 mm Hg after 6 weeks. BP was normalized (systolic BP less than 160 and diastolic BP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) in 57% of patients taking rilmenidine and 56% of patients taking clonidine (60% of normalized patients had been taking the single dose in both groups).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of acebutolol with and without hydrochlorothiazide versus carvedilol with and without hydrochlorothiazide in black patients with mild to moderate systemic hypertension.

In the present study, we assessed the antihypertensive efficacy of acebutolol 200 mg versus carvedilol 25 mg once daily, given as monotherapy for 3 months to 40 black patients (20 patients in each group, mean age 53+/-10 years, 24 women) with mean blood pressure (BP) during the day >90 and <110 mm Hg. Patients in whom blood pressure could not be controlled took medication, which was increased at 3-month intervals as follows: step 2, acebutolol 200 mg or carvedilol 25 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg once daily; step 3, acebutolol 400 mg or carvedilol 50 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg once daily. Overall, significant but modest BP reduction was achieved with both beta blockers at 3 months. In the acebutolol group, 24-hour BP decreased from 142+/-15/94+/-7 mm Hg to 138+/-16/89+/-8 mm Hg (p<0.005 for diastolic BP at 3 months vs baseline). Mean day BP decreased from 145+/-15/98+/-5 mm Hg to 140+/-14/93+/-7 mm Hg (p<0.05 for systolic BP and p<0.0005 for diastolic BP at 3 months vs. baseline). In the carvedilol group, 24-hour BP decreased from 145+/-11/93+/-6 to 138+/-16/87+/-9 mm Hg (p<0.05 for systolic BP and p<0.005 for diastolic BP at 3 months vs baseline). Mean day BP decreased from 149+/-10/99+/-5 to 141+/-16/91+/-87 mm Hg (p<0.05 for systolic BP and p<0.0005 for diastolic BP at 3 months vs baseline). At 12 months, most patients required combination therapy to achieve BP control. The control (mean day diastolic BP <90 mm Hg) and response (mean day diastolic BP decrease > or =10 mm Hg) rates at 12 months were 59% and 82% in the acebutolol and 78% and 78% in the carvedilol groups, respectively. In conclusion, acebutolol or carvedilol in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, rather than acebutolol or carvedilol alone, should be considered as first-line antihypertensive therapy in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension.     

Sildenafil citrate potentiates the hypotensive effects of nitric oxide donor drugs in male patients with stable angina

OBJECTIVE: We sought to study the effects of a single oral dose of sildenafil citrate (50 mg) on blood pressure (BP) in men taking the nitric oxide (NO) donor drugs isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) or glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) for stable angina. BACKGROUND: Sildenafil, a selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, is an orally effective treatment for erectile dysfunction. The presence of phosphodiesterases in the vasculature suggests the possibility of an interaction between sildenafil and NO donor drugs. METHODS: Two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-way crossover trials were undertaken. Sixteen male patients received oral ISMN (20 mg twice a day) for five to seven days before their dose of sildenafil or placebo and continued receiving ISMN daily until administration of the alternate drug seven days later. For the second study, 15 male patients received sublingual GTN (500 microg) 1 h after sildenafil or placebo on each of two study days, which were seven days apart. Sitting or standing BP was measured before and for 6 h after the administration of the study drug. RESULTS: The effects of sildenafil plus ISMN on BP (standing mean maximum reductions from baseline in systolic/diastolic BP, -52/-29 mm Hg) were greater than the effects of placebo plus ISMN on BP (-25/-15 mm Hg; p < 0.001). Sildenafil plus GTN also resulted in greater sitting mean maximum reductions from baseline in systolic/diastolic BP (-36/-21 mm Hg) compared with placebo plus GTN (-26/-12 mm Hg; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of sildenafil with ISMN or GTN produced significantly greater reductions in BP than ISMN or GTN alone. Based on these data, sildenafil should not be administered to patients taking nitrates.     

Antihypertensive efficacy of the ACE-inhibitor perindopril in the elderly

To assess the antihypertensive efficacy of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor, perindopril, in the elderly, patients >65 years of age with supine diastolic blood pressure (BP) > or =90 and < or =110 mm Hg at the end of a 4-week placebo washout period were treated with perindopril 4-8 mg/daily vs placebo using a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel group design. Of the 191 patients entered, 183 completed 8 weeks of double-blind therapy. Average age was 72-73 years. Supine and standing BP at the end of the placebo run-in period were 173/96 vs 168/96 mm Hg. BPs were measured in the morning, 20-25 h after the previous day's dose (ie, at the end of the dosing interval). In the placebo group, supine and standing diastolic BP decreased by 3-4 mm Hg, and systolic BP by 6-7 mm Hg. In the perindopril-group, diastolic BP decreased by 6-7 mm Hg and systolic BP by 10-13 mm Hg (both P < 0.01 vs placebo). These data indicate a substantial placebo response of particularly systolic BP in older hypertensives and indicate the importance of a parallel placebo-group to assess the extent of the actual drug's effect. Perindopril caused additional decreases in diastolic BP by about 2 mm Hg, and in systolic BP by 4-5 mm Hg. The extent of this drug-effect may be less in older vs middle-aged hypertensives.     

Comparison in young and elderly patients of pharmacodynamics and disposition of labetalol in systemic hypertension

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of labetalol, a combined alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor antagonist drug, were studied in elderly and young hypertensive patients. After receiving intravenous labetalol, elderly patients had a greater maximal mean decrease in systolic blood pressure (BP) (39 +/- 8 vs 25 +/- 13 mm Hg, p less than 0.02); however, maximal decrease in diastolic BP was similar in elderly (18 +/- 10 mm Hg) and young (17 +/- 6 mm Hg) patients. After receiving oral labetalol, elderly patients had a greater maximal decrease in standing systolic BP (41 +/- 16 vs 16 +/- 14 mm Hg, p less than 0.001) and similar decreases in standing diastolic BP (21 +/- 7 vs 17 +/- 9 mm Hg). Sitting maximal BP decreases after oral labetalol treatment were similar in elderly and young patients (12 +/- 16 vs 17 +/- 7 mm Hg systolic and 24 +/- 6 vs 12 +/- 7 diastolic). The decrease in heart rate was greater in young patients after intravenous labetalol administration. To evaluate labetalol pharmacodynamics, a linear model was used. Slope of labetalol concentration vs systolic BP for elderly vs young patients was 0.928 +/- 1.05 vs 0.326 +/- 0.490 ng/ml X mm Hg-1 (difference not significant). The slope of labetalol concentration vs heart rate for elderly vs young patients was 0.176 +/- 0.063 vs 0.406 +/- 0.303 ng/ml X beats/min-1 (p less than 0.05), with 2 elderly patients showing no decrease in heart rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pulse pressure lowering effect of dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril vs. high-dose ACE inhibition in hypertensive type 2 diabetic subjects: a CALM II study post-hoc analysis

BACKGROUND: Elevated pulse pressure (PP) is strongly associated with micro- and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetic patients. We examined the effect of 12 months of dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril vs. high-dose lisinopril monotherapy on ambulatory PP in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients from the CALM (Candesartan and Lisinopril Microalbuminuria Trial) II study. METHODS: The CALM II study was a 12-month prospective, randomized, parallel-group, double-masked study that included 75 type 1 and type 2 diabetic subjects with hypertension. Participants were randomized for treatment with either high-dose lisinopril (40 mg once daily (o.d.)) or for dual blockade treatment with candesartan (16 mg o.d.) and lisinopril (20 mg o.d.). In this article, we present data from the post-hoc subgroup of 51 type 2 diabetic subjects who completed the full 12-month study period with successful ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements at both baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: Baseline 24-h BP values were similar in the two groups (24-h systolic BP (SBP) 130 +/- 12 vs. 127 +/- 9, 24-h diastolic BP (DBP) 77 +/- 8 vs. 74 +/- 7, and 24-h PP 53 +/- 8 vs. 53 +/- 7 mm Hg, for the lisinopril and dual blockade groups, respectively, P > 0.2 for all). Compared with lisinopril monotherapy, dual blockade treatment caused a highly significant reduction in 24-h PP levels (-5 +/- 5 mm Hg, P = 0.003), albeit the difference in the BP lowering effect between the treatment groups did not differ significantly for 24-h systolic (P = 0.21) or diastolic (P = 0.49) BP. Dual blockade treatment significantly lowered 24-h SBP (-5 +/- 11 mm Hg, P = 0.03), but not 24-h DBP (-2 +/- 7 mm Hg, P = 0.29), whereas in the lisinopril group, the opposite effect was observed (24-h SBP -1 +/- 9 mm Hg, P = 0.45, 24-h SBP -3 +/- 7 mm Hg, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Twelve months of dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril significantly reduced PP when compared with high-dose monotherapy with lisinopril. Larger studies are needed to confirm this observation, and to evaluate whether this effect translates into a greater degree of end-organ protection from dual blockade treatment than from conventional angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition.     

Prognostic value of blood pressure in acute stroke

Manipulation of blood pressure (BP) in acute stroke may improve outcome. Despite various studies, data on the prognostic significance of early BP in stroke remain unclear. Therefore, we studied the relationship between various BP variables in the acute phase of stroke and functional outcome at 3 months. Blood pressures were collected by reviewing BP records of 817 patients who were admitted to our stroke unit between 1987 and 1992. Besides the first systolic and diastolic admission BP (SBP and DBP), we also used the mean of the daytime as well as the night-time systolic and diastolic BP values. Finally, we studied the relationship between the decrease in BP between day 0 and 4 and outcome. As dependent outcome variable we used the Rankin handicap score at 3 months dichotomized in a score >3 (poor outcome) vs a score 3 (good outcome). A total of 430 patients were admitted within 24 h following stroke onset. There was no significant relationship between the systolic and diastolic BP and the outcome at 3 months. Only night-time systolic BP 165 mm Hg (odds ratio (OR) 2.8; 95% CI 1.1-6.8), night-time diastolic BP 60 mm Hg (OR 8.1; 95% CI 1.1-58.3), and a decrease in daytime diastolic BP between day 0 and 4 of 10 mm Hg (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.1-7.9) showed a significant relationship with poor outcome. Our findings suggest that admission BP values may not reliably reflect any impact of BP on stroke outcome. They also suggest a potential differential effect of BP manipulation: increasing or decreasing BP may be beneficial for patients with BP extremes in one direction, but detrimental for those with BP values in the opposite direction.     

Bovine casein hydrolysate (c12 Peptide) reduces blood pressure in prehypertensive subjects

BACKGROUND: About one in four adults suffer from prehypertension. People with prehypertension are at risk of developing hypertension, being a biomarker for cardiovascular disease risk. The use of milk-derived protein hydrolysates containing peptides with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibiting properties may reduce blood pressure (BP) and thus the risk of developing hypertension. METHODS: We investigated the BP-lowering effect of a casein-derived protein hydrolysate (C12 Peptide) during a 4-week intervention period in prehypertensive subjects. After a 2-week run-in period, 48 Taiwanese volunteers were randomly assigned to either placebo or C12 Peptide tablets for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week off-treatment period. After the run-in period, BP was measured weekly. RESULTS: Baseline values for systolic BP (mean +/- SEM) in the placebo and C12 Peptide groups were 137.1 +/- 3.1 and 137.9 +/- 2.4 mm Hg, respectively; those for diastolic BP were 85.2 +/- 2.1 and 86.9 +/- 2.0 mm Hg, respectively. Four weeks repeated daily intake of 3.8 g C12 Peptide reduced significantly systolic and diastolic BP by 10.7 +/- 1.6 mm Hg and 6.9 +/- 1.2 mm Hg, respectively, compared to baseline. Furthermore, plasma angiotensin II and aldosterone levels were reduced significantly (P < .05). The placebo group showed a BP reduction of 3.6 +/- 2.4 and 2.7 +/- 1.6 mm Hg in systolic and diastolic BP, respectively (P = not significant). No evidence of side effects was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that C12 Peptide reduces BP in prehypertensive people.     

Effect of indapamide SR in the treatment of hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of the sustained-release formulation of indapamide (indapamide SR) in type 2 diabetic patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension and its possible side effects, particularly on glucose metabolism and lipid profiles. METHODS: A total of 64 patients randomly received 1.5 mg of indapamide SR or placebo once daily for 3 months. The effects were evaluated by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitor, fasting blood sampling for biochemistry, lipid profiles, and frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. RESULTS: The changes in standing and supine blood pressure (BP) were significant (154.7 +/- 9.4/94 +/- 2.9 mm Hg v 134.4 +/- 5.1/82.4 +/- 5 mm Hg and 155 +/- 9.8/94.6 +/- 3.6 mm Hg v 135.1 +/- 4.9/82.1 +/- 4.7 mm Hg) in the indapamide group, but not in the placebo group. According to the 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitor reading, a significant reduction was observed in not only in the whole-day mean BP (mean systolic BP/mean diastolic BP, 149 +/- 19.3/87.6 +/- 11.3 mm Hg v 135.7 +/- 12.6/79.6 +/- 9 mm Hg) but also the whole-day mean median arterial pressure (109 +/- 12.7 mm Hg v 98.7 +/- 8.2 mm Hg) for the indapamide group, but not the placebo group. There were no changes in biochemical data including serum sodium, potassium, chloride, uric acid, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, lipid profiles, fasting blood glucose, insulin, hemoglobin Alc, and glucose metabolism parameters (insulin sensitivity, glucose effectiveness, and acute insulin response) from frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test after indapamide or placebo therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Indapamide SR can significantly lower the whole-day BP in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Also, it did not alter or aggravate patients' lipid profiles, glucose metabolism, and did not exert possible side effects of hypokalemia and hyperuricemia. Therefore, monotherapy with indapamide SR should be suggested in type 2 diabetic patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.     

Comparison of the Omron HEM-637 wrist monitor to the auscultation method with the wrist position sensor on or disabled

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the Omron HEM637 wrist model with the wrist positioning sensor turned on (Son) is more accurate relative to upper arm auscultation by trained professionals than when the sensor was manually turned off (Soff). METHODS: Forty-four subjects, at least 30 years old, had repeated, sequential dual-observer upper arm auscultatory measurements (5 to 6 each) and oscillometric Omron HEM637 wrist measurements (4 each). Nineteen subjects were assigned to the wrist sensor On group and 25 were assigned to the wrist sensor Off group. A total of 425 auscultatory and 164 wrist measurements were analyzed. RESULTS: The Omron HEM-637 measured the blood pressure (BP) with equal accuracy to the observers using the auscultatory technique (difference -1.37 +/- 8.51/3.47 +/- 8.07 mm Hg, P =.71/.14). The wrist sensor did improve the accuracy of the measurements compared to the subjects that had the sensor deactivated. The sensor On group (Son) measured the systolic BP (0.82 +/- 9.83 mm Hg) and diastolic BP (-0.72 +/- 9.07 mm Hg) statistically the same as by auscultation (P =.86 for systolic BP and P =.83 for diastolic BP). The sensor Off (Soff) group measured the SBP (-3.03 +/- 7.12 mm Hg) and diastolic BP (-5.56 +/- 6.68 mm Hg) statistically different than auscultation (P =.46 for systolic BP and P =.02 for diastolic BP). The higher (negative) measurement for both the systolic BP and diastolic BP suggests that the average position of the wrist was 1.75 inches (4.4 cm) below the heart level in this group with the sensor off. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the Omron HEM-637 monitor with a wrist sensor more accurately measured BP compared to the same model with the sensor turned off.     

A Reasonable Blood Pressure Level for Good Clinical Outcome After the Acute Phase of Ischemic Stroke

Blood pressure (BP) levels are closely associated with clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke, but current research data cannot yet determine what level of reasonable BP should be maintained in clinical practice. The authors conducted a prospective registered clinical trial and enrolled 873 patients admitted for the first episode of acute ischemic stroke within 24 hours from symptom onset and with normal neurological function before stroke. Analysis results showed that the highest probability of good neurological recovery was associated with the lowest risk of neurological deterioration and poor functional outcome at systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) levels of 140 mm Hg to 159 mm Hg and DBP 90 mm Hg to 99 mm Hg, respectively, whereas patients with extreme hypotension (SBP <100 mm Hg /DBP <70 mm Hg) and hypertension (SBP ≥200 mm Hg /DBP ≥120 mm Hg) were associated with poor neurological recovery. Both higher and lower BP levels in the acute phase of ischemic stroke were unfavorable to neurological functional recovery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.948/1.913 and 2.129/2.022, respectively, with SBP 120–139 mm Hg as a reference). In addition, BP maintained at SBP 140 mm Hg to 159 mm Hg and DBP 90 mm Hg to 99 mm Hg within 7 days after stroke may be beneficial to neurological functional recovery.     

Frequent nurse visits decrease white coat effect in stage III hypertension

Arterial hypertension is a public health problem and patient adherence to treatment is challenging. This study tested whether frequent nurse visits provide additional benefits to antihypertensive treatment. Every 30 days, a pharmacist visited these patients to deliver antihypertensive drugs and perform a pill count. Nurses visited group A (48 patients) every 15 days and group B (52 patients) every 90 days. Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring was performed 15 and 180 days after randomization. At randomization, groups A and B had the same clinical systolic (191 +/- 5 v 186 +/- 3 mm Hg) and diastolic BP levels (122 +/- 3 v 117 +/- 4 mm Hg), respectively. After 90 days, BP declined more in group A than in group B (35 +/- 5/19 +/- 3 v 27 +/- 5/9 +/- 3 mm Hg). At 180 days, the difference increased because the reduction persisted in group A but decreased in group B (36 +/- 6/21 +/- 4 v 17 +/- 4/10 +/- 2 mm Hg). The mean ambulatory BP monitoring values were similar in both groups at 15 and 180 days. However, the attenuation of the clinic-daytime BP difference was larger in group A than in group B (systolic, -13 +/- 4 v -3 +/- 4 mm Hg; diastolic -11 +/- 3 v -4 +/- 3 mm Hg). The patients with clinic-daytime differences decreased more in group A (systolic, 16 to 10; diastolic, 20 to 14) than in group B (systolic, 19 and 20; diastolic, 22 and 22). These data indicate that frequent nurse visits significantly attenuate the white coat effect (clinic daytime BP difference).     

Treatment of systemic hypertension in insulin-treated diabetes mellitus with rilmenidine

The effects of a new alpha 2 agonist (S 3341 or rilmenidine) on blood pressure (BP), glycemic control, lipid metabolism and renal function were investigated during a 16-week open study in 29 insulin-treated diabetic patients with mild to moderate hypertension. There were 17 men and 12 women aged 50.9 +/- 2.2 years (mean +/- standard error of the mean). Duration of diabetes and insulin therapy was 218 +/- 24 and 143 +/- 30 months. After 2 weeks of placebo, systolic and diastolic BP was 165 +/- 3 and 97 +/- 0.5 mm Hg, respectively (supine). Rilmenidine (S 3341) given alone at daily doses of 1 or 2 mg according to the clinical response led to a prompt and sustained decrease of systolic and diastolic BP (159 +/- 4 and 88 +/- 1 mm Hg after 2 weeks; 149 +/- 3 and 85 +/- 1 mm Hg after 12 weeks; p less than 0.01). Seventeen patients (59%) had normal BP (systolic BP less than 160; diastolic BP less than 90 mm Hg, supine) after 12 weeks of S 3341. Diuretics were associated with S 3341 for the nonresponders at week 12; this led to normalization of BP in 90% of the patients at the end of the study. Glycemic control was assessed by home glucose monitoring (5 determinations/1 day per week), 24-hour glucosuria and postprandial plasma glucose at the outpatient clinic (n = 7) as well as by the measurement of the glycosylated hemoglobin. None of these parameters was significantly affected by S 3341.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of calcium supplementation on blood pressure in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism

The aim was to study the effect of calcium supplementation 477 mg twice daily on BP in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism during an intervention study (6 weeks) and after 954 mg during a short study (3 h). The intervention study was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over, while the short study gave a placebo and calcium in random order on separate days. The participants were obtained from an epidemiological survey in Troms? 1994-1995 that included more than 27.000 subjects. The re-examination was performed in 2000/2001 at the University Hospital of North Norway, Norway. There were 18 subjects with secondary hyperparathyroidism and 28 control subjects in the intervention study while there were 14 cases and 8 control subjects in the short study. The results showed that in the subjects with secondary hyperparathyroidism after calcium supplementation in the intervention study there was an increase in serum calcium from 2.28 +/- 0.09 to 2.36 +/- 0.06 mmol/l (mean +/- SD) and a decrease in serum PTH from 8.6+/-1.6 to 6.5+/-2.4 pmol/l. However, there was no significant difference in either systolic or diastolic BP between calcium supplementation and placebo (138.3 +/- 21.0 vs 135.9 +/- 17.0 mm Hg and 80.9 +/- 11.1 vs 78.9+/-9.5 mm Hg, respectively). Similar results were seen in the control group. In the short study, serum calcium increased and serum PTH decreased after oral calcium, but the BP did not differ as compared to when placebo was given. To conclude, in the present setting we did not find any effect on BP by calcium supplementation in subjects with moderate secondary hyperparathyroidism.     

Time course of the interaction between tadalafil and nitrates

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the time course of nitrate interaction with tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor with a half-life (t(1/2)) of 17.5 h. BACKGROUND: The PDE5 inhibitors augment the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects of nitrates, yet the time course of this interaction is unclear. Recent guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommend that nitrates be withheld for 24 h after taking sildenafil (t(1/2) = 4 h). METHODS: Male subjects (n = 150) received seven consecutive daily doses of placebo or tadalafil (20 mg). On day 7 and beyond, subjects received repeated doses of sublingual nitroglycerin (0.4 mg) after the last dose of placebo or tadalafil. After a 10- to 21-day washout period, subjects crossed over to either placebo or tadalafil, and nitrate dosing was repeated. RESULTS: In response to nitroglycerin at 4, 8, and 24 h, standing systolic BP fell below 85 mm Hg in more subjects on tadalafil compared with placebo (p < 0.05), with no difference in the response to nitroglycerin at 48, 72, and 96 h (p > 0.2). Similar observations were made for standing diastolic BP <45 mm Hg, decrease in systolic BP >30 mm Hg, and decrease in diastolic BP >20 mm Hg. Nitroglycerin also evoked greater mean maximal decreases in standing systolic BP at 8 and 24 h after taking tadalafil versus placebo (p < 0.02), with no significant difference at 48, 72, or 96 h (p > 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: The hemodynamic interaction between tadalafil and sublingual nitroglycerin lasted 24 h, but was not seen at 48 h and beyond. Similar to other PDE5 inhibitors, tadalafil should not be administered in combination with organic nitrates.     

Low dose bendrofluazide (1.25 mg) effectively lowers blood pressure over 24 h: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study.

Previous studies indicate that low dose bendrofluazide (1.25 mg/day) has no deleterious effect on insulin sensitivity in contrast to conventional doses. To evaluate the antihypertensive effect of 1.25 mg bendrofluazide across 24 h, we studied 12 subjects in a randomized, double blind, cross-over trial, comprising 8 weeks of either 1.25 mg/day bendrofluazide or placebo. Twenty-four-hour blood pressure averages were significantly lower after bendrofluazide compared with placebo (systolic 125 +/- 4 v 136 +/- 3 mm Hg, P < .005; diastolic: 78 +/- 2 v 85 +/- 2 mm Hg, P < .01). Trough:peak ratios were 0.67 +/- 0.07 for systolic and 0.72 +/- 0.15 for diastolic blood pressure reduction. In conclusion, 1.25 mg bendrofluazide daily produced a useful antihypertensive effect across the full 24-h period.