Clinical outcomes of surgery of mitral valve regurgitation and coronary artery bypass grafting

The impact of etiology of associated mitral valve regurgitation and a valve procedure on operative and long-term outcomes after coronary bypass grafting surgery is yet to be clearly defined. Results of combined coronary artery bypass grafting and valve procedures for mitral valve regurgitation were retrospectively analyzed in 468 patients. The regurgitation was of ischemic in 45%, degenerative in 55% and 78% valve repairs, 22% valve replacements were performed. Severe coronary artery disease, acute myocardial infarction, low ejection fraction, ischemic mitral regurgitation, advanced heart failure symptoms, failure to use internal mammary artery, valve replacement surgery, and emergency operations are predictors of operative mortality. The 5-year survivals for propensity-matched patients of ischemic and degenerative disease were similar (66%), but 67% vs. 83%, respectively, for unmatched patients. Low ejection fraction (<35%), advanced age (>67 years), valve replacement surgery, residual mitral regurgitation, and severe coronary artery disease were predictors of poor long-term survival. Left ventricular remodeling processes, optimal valve procedure without residual mitral regurgitation and left ventricular function are important determinants of long-term outcome than the etiology of valve regurgitation.     

Late outcome of mitral valve surgery for patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: We plan to determine whether the cause of mitral valve regurgitation, ischemic or degenerative, affects survival after combined mitral valve repair or replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery and to assess the influence of residual mitral regurgitation on late outcome. METHODS: A retrospective study was made of 302 patients having mitral valve repair or replacement and CABG from January 1987 through December 1996. Risk factors for death, for development of New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure (CHF), and recurrent mitral valve regurgitation were identified by proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: The cause of mitral regurgitation was ischemic in 137 patients (45%) and degenerative in 165 patients (55%). Valve replacement was performed in 51 patients (17%) and valve repair in 251 patients (83%). Median follow-up was 64 months. Ten-year actuarial survival rates were 33% (95% confidence interval: 22% to 47%) in the ischemic group and 52% (95% confidence interval: 42% to 64%) in the degenerative group. Univariate predictors of death, were entered into a multivariate model. Older age, ejection fraction of 35% or less, three-vessel coronary artery disease, replacement of the mitral valve, and residual mitral regurgitation at dismissal were independent risk factors for death. The cause of mitral valve regurgitation (ischemic or degenerative) was not an independent predictor of long-term survival, class III or IV CHF, or recurrent regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: Survival after mitral valve surgery and CABG is determined by the extent of coronary disease and ventricular dysfunction and by the success of the valve procedure; etiology of mitral valve regurgitation has relatively little impact on late outcome.     

Desflurane versus propofol in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery

OBJECTIVE: Myocardial ischemic damage is reduced by volatile anesthetics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, but it is unknown whether this benefit exists in patients undergoing valvular surgery with ischemia-reperfusion injury related to cardioplegic arrest and cardiopulmonary bypass. This study compared cardiac troponin release in patients receiving either volatile anesthetics or total intravenous anesthesia for mitral valve surgery. DESIGN: Randomized controlled study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. Interventions: Fifty-nine patients received the volatile anesthetic desflurane for 30 minutes before cardiopulmonary bypass, whereas 61 patients received a total intravenous anesthetic with propofol. All patients had an opioid-based anesthetic for the mitral valve surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Peak postoperative troponin I release was measured as a marker of myocardial necrosis after mitral valve surgery. Patient mean age was 60 years, and 54% were men. There was no significant (p = 0.7) reduction in median (25th-75th percentiles) postoperative peak troponin, 11.0 (7.5-17.4) ng/dL in the desflurane group versus 11.5 (6.9-18.0) ng/dL in the propofol group. A subgroup of patients with concomitant coronary artery disease had the expected reduction (p = 0.02) of peak troponin I in those receiving desflurane, 14.0 (9.7-17.3) ng/dL, when compared with patients receiving total intravenous anesthesia, 31.6 (15.7-52.0) ng/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial damage measured by cardiac troponin release was not reduced by volatile anesthetics in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery, whereas it was reduced in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease.     

Beating heart surgery for ischemic mitral regurgitation: report of a case

A 51-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of dyspnea. Coronary angiography revealed triple vessel disease and echocardiography demonstrated severe mitral regurgitation with poor left ventricular function. Under a diagnosis of ischemic mitral regurgitation, on-pump beating mitral annuloplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting using the normothermic retrograde continuous coronary sinus perfusion of oxygenated blood was performed in order to prevent reperfusion injury. The patient was easily weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass and his postoperative course was uneventful. Because of the advantages of this procedure (e.g., no reperfusion injury, testing of the mitral valve repair is done in real physiologic conditions with beating tonus), on-pump beating heart surgery seems a good surgical option for ischemic mitral regurgitation with poor left ventricular function.     

Decreasing mortality for aortic and mitral valve surgery in Northern New England. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group

BACKGROUND: Although numerous reports have documented declining mortality rates associated with coronary artery bypass surgery in recent years, it is unknown whether similar trends have occurred with valve surgery during this time. METHODS: We conducted a regional, prospective study to assess trends in patient casemix and in-hospital mortality rates over time with aortic valve replacement (AVR), mitral valve replacement (MVR), and mitral valve repair. Data were collected from all patients undergoing AVR (n = 2,596), MVR (n = 759), or mitral valve repair (n = 522) in Northern New England between January 1992 and December 1997. Logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors of in-hospital mortality and to calculate risk-adjusted mortality rates. RESULTS: For AVR, the trend in patient casemix was toward increased risk with increases in patient age and in the proportion of patients with: body surface area less than 1.7, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and prior valve surgery. A decrease was noted in the proportion of patients undergoing additional surgical procedures. For MVR, patient risk improved over the time period with fewer female patients and fewer patients with coronary artery disease. For mitral valve repair patient risk increased over the time period with increases in the proportion of patients with coronary artery disease, diabetes, and whose surgical priority was classified as urgent. In addition, there was a borderline significant increase in the proportion of mitral valve repair patients in New York Heart Association class IV preoperatively. Risk-adjusted mortality decreased 44% from 9.3% in 1992 through 1993 to 5.3% in 1996 through 1997 for patients undergoing AVR (p = 0.01) and decreased 53% from 13.6% in 1992 through 1993 to 8.2% in 1996 through 1997 for patients undergoing MVR (p = 0.01). We observed a statistically insignificant increase in risk-adjusted mortality over the time period for patients undergoing mitral valve repair (from 3.6% in 1992 through 1993 to 5.0% in 1996 through 1997; p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvement in mortality rates with valve replacement was observed in northern New England during this time period. This improvement persisted following adjustment for changes in patient casemix over this time. These trends mirror improvements in mortality with other cardiac surgical interventions that have been observed in recent years in our region and nationally.     

Comparative morbidity of mitral valve repair versus replacement for mitral regurgitation with and without coronary artery disease

Mitral valve repair has been increasingly used at our hospital for mitral regurgitation with and without coronary disease. From January, 1984, to June, 1987, of 338 patients undergoing all forms of mitral valve surgery, 140 had first-time surgery for pure mitral regurgitation: 75 had valve repair, and 65 had valve replacement. Thirty-three of 75 (44%) had concomitant coronary bypass in the repair group, while 21 of 65 (32%) had coronary bypass in the replacement group. The mean functional class (3.4 versus 3.5), age (60 versus 61 years), and preoperative hemodynamics were similar in both groups. The cause of mitral regurgitation in the repair group was myxomatous change in 32 patients, ischemia in 27, rheumatic valve disease in 12, and endocarditis in 4. A Carpentier ring was used in 46, a Duran ring was used in 11, and none was used in 18. The operative mortality was 3 of 75 patients (4%) in the repair group, all with coronary artery bypass grafting, versus 2 of 65 patients (3%) in the replacement group, 1 of whom had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting. The mean postoperative functional class 15 months postoperatively was 1.12 in the repair group versus 1.15 in the replacement group. There were 7 late deaths in the replacement group and only 3 late deaths in the repair group. Actuarial survival at 30 months was 85 +/- 6% for the replacement group and 94 +/- 4% for the repair group. There were 5 late emboli (1 fatal, 4 nonfatal) after valve replacement and none after valve repair (p = 0.03).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Combined coronary artery bypass, mitral valve plasty, and abdominal aneurysmectomy in an 80-year-old patient: Report of a case

An 80-year-old man suffering from angina on exertion due to stenosis of the left main coronary artery, heart failure due to mitral valve regurgitation, and an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was successfully operated on with simultaneous surgical procedures. A coronary cineangiography revealed 90% stenosis of the left main coronary artery in segment 5, and 99% and 90% stenosis in segments 2 and 4AV, respectively, of the right coronary artery. Left ventriculography and aortography showed moderate mitral valve regurgitation and the presence of a fusiform-shaped AAA with a maximum diameter of 6 cm. It was thought that insertion of an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) would prove difficult due to AAA; therefore, simultaneous surgery combining triple coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), mitral valve plasty, and prosthetic replacement of the AAA was undertaken. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and subsequent angiography showed good patency of all coronary bypass grafts and the abdominal prosthesis, along with the disappearance of mitral regurgitation. This patient's clinical course suggests that an extended surgical procedure is effective for the treatment of complicated cardiovascular disease, even in very elderly patients.     

Early and late results of combined valvular and coronary artery surgery

A total of 42 patients with combined valvular and coronary artery surgery were examined to analyze risk factors for cardiac related events and late deaths. There were aortic valve disease in 26 patients and mitral valve disease in 16. Preoperatively, 14 patients (33%) had cardiac dysfunction (ejection fraction < or = 40%) and 10 patients (24%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV. There was no operative death with 96% of early graft patency. There was 8 late deaths during 5.6 years of mean follow up. Actuarial survival rate was 86% and 64% after 5 and 10 years, respectively. Cardiac dysfunction was a significant independent predictor for late death. Cardiac related events occurred in 9 patients. Freedom from cardiac related events was 78% and 59% after 5 and 10 years, respectively. Cardiac dysfunction and mitral valve surgery were significant independent predictors for cardiac related events. Late result of combined mitral and coronary artery surgery was unfavorable in patients with cardiac dysfunction.     

Treatment of moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary disease by coronary bypass alone

We have favored treatment of moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary disease with coronary bypass alone because of the high operative mortality of combined mitral valve replacement and coronary bypass. Between 1977 and 1983, coronary bypass alone was performed on 58 patients (mean age 63 +/- 8 years). Preoperatively, 90% had Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III or IV angina, and 10% had class III or IV congestive heart failure. In 72% mitral regurgitation had been caused by coronary disease. Hospital mortality was 3.4% (2/58). At follow-up (100% complete, mean 4.3 years) 66% of survivors were functional classes I and II (compared with 7% preoperatively, p less than 0.0001). Of those patients who worked preoperatively, 84% returned to work. There were no reoperations. The 5-year survival was 77%. In the same period combined mitral valve replacement and coronary bypass was required in 20 unmatched patients with moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary disease. Indications for valve replacement included congestive heart failure (10 cases), high left atrial pressure (three cases), and mitral stenosis (four cases). In these patients with more advanced symptoms the hospital mortality was 25%, and the 5-year survival was 31%. Treatment of moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary disease by coronary bypass alone achieved excellent hospital survival and long-term functional stability without a subsequent valve operation.     

Large pseudoaneurysm of left ventricle following cardiac surgery

A 75-year old female patient, with previous inferior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in December 2000, was admitted in April 2001 with angina and heart failure. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was suggestive of a postero-inferior pseudoaneurysm (PA) of the left ventricle (LV), with 61x49 mm. of size and mitral regurgitation. Cardiac catheterization was suspected of a PA of the LV and revealed a three vessels coronary artery disease. On 20th April she was submitted to cardiac surgery with resection of a large LV aneurysm (AN) and triple coronary artery bypass surgery. Afterwards, she was on NYHA class III and subsequent TTE and transesophagic echocardiography (TEE) were suggestive of a 90x60 mm LV posterior PA (confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance) and severe mitral regurgitation, with good LV systolic function. She underwent a new cardiac surgery on 31st May 2002, with resuturing of the LV postero-inferior wall patch and removal of the PA. The patient is in good condition and on NYHA functional class I-II.     

Mitral valve surgery in emergency for severe acute regurgitation: analysis of postoperative results from a multicentre study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate postoperative outcome of emergency surgery for acute severe mitral regurgitation (ASMR) from a multicentre experience. METHODS: In six centres, 279 patients (mean age 62+/-14 years, 62% female) undergoing emergency surgery for ASMR from December 1986 to March 2007 were analysed and followed up. Aetiology included acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 126 patients (group 1, 45%), degenerative mitral valve disease in 74 (group 2, 26%), and acute endocarditis (AE) in 79 (group 3, 28%). Preoperatively, all patients were in haemodynamic instability, with 185 patients in cardiogenic shock (66%), 184 (66%) intubated, and 61 (22%) on IABP, respectively. Valve repair was performed in 76 (27%), whereas 203 (73%) underwent valve replacement. Median follow-up (98% complete) was 70.8 months (inter-quartile range 59.8-86.66 months). RESULTS: Overall 30-day mortality was 22.5% (63/279). Early death was significantly lower in group 2 (p<0.001 and p=0.005 vs group 1 and 3, respectively) whereas no difference was detected between group 1 and 3. At logistic regression analysis AMI, AE, shock, left ventricular dysfunction, and coronary artery disease were predictors of early death. Overall 15-year survival was 67+/-10%. Survival was lower in group 1 (39+/-11%) than in group 2 (75+/-9%) and group 3 (77+/-10%). Cox regression found AMI, and associated coronary artery disease to be predictors of late death. Overall 15-year actuarial and actual freedom from cardiac-related events were 44+/-9% and 28+/-10%, respectively, with the worst outcome in the presence of AE. Associated coronary artery disease, AE, AMI, preoperative atrial fibrillation, and chronic renal failure were independent predictors of cardiac-related events. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency surgery for ASMR remains a surgical challenge for high incidence of early and late cardiac-related events, particularly in patients with associated coronary artery disease and acute endocarditis. Apparently, type of mitral valve surgical approaches (repair or replacement) did not provide any influence on postoperative outcome.     

Port-access mitral valve replacement after surgical correction for Bland-White-Garland syndrome

A 79-year-old woman with Bland-White-Garland syndrome was admitted to our institution for surgical treatment of severe mitral regurgitation (MR). She had previously undergone mitral valve repair and coronary artery bypass grafting for both mitral insufficiency and a coronary artery anomaly 14 years earlier. However, the degree of residual MR had gradually worsened, and redo mitral valve surgery was scheduled. Multidetector row computed tomography revealed that the right coronary artery (RCA) was dilated and located just behind the sternum, and saphenous vein graft bypassed to the left anterior descending artery was occluded. This meant that the RCA was the only vessel supplying coronary blood flow. We successfully performed port-access mitral valve replacement under mild hypothermia with fibrillatory arrest to prevent damage to the RCA. We propose that port-access surgery is a safe and effective treatment for redo cardiac surgery after initial surgical correction of a congenital heart anomaly.     

Combined surgery for mitral regurgitation associated with extensive annular calcification and left main coronary artery disease

Although extensive calcification of the mitral annulus is encountered infrequently, it presents a formidable problem in mitral valve surgery. We describe a case of severely calcified mitral annulus associated with grade IV mitral regurgitation in addition to left main coronary artery disease. The patient was a 66-year-old woman who successfully underwent thorough excision of the calcified bar, annular reconstruction with a autologous pericardial strip, mitral valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis, and double coronary artery bypass grafting using arterial grafts.     

Can late survival of patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation be impacted by intervention on the valve?

BACKGROUND: Ischemic mitral regurgitation is known to be associated with poor long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting; however, our ability to alter that outcome with intervention on the valve is unclear. The decision to address the valve is most challenging for patients with only moderate mitral regurgitation, particularly with the popularization of off-pump surgery. We therefore reviewed early and late outcomes of patients undergoing revascularization with or without mitral valve surgery. METHODS: Patients with moderate mitral regurgitation undergoing revascularization with and without mitral surgery between January 1991 and September 1996 were identified retrospectively. Operative notes were reviewed and patients with structural valve disease excluded. Perioperative events and late outcomes as determined by telephone contact and search of the social security death index (survival data 97% complete) were compared. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six patients with moderate mitral regurgitation underwent revascularization alone (n = 142) or with mitral repair or replacement (n = 34). Those undergoing revascularization alone had a higher serum creatinine, somewhat less mitral regurgitation, and lower New York Heart Association functional class preoperatively. Operative mortality was greater with valve surgery (21% vs 9%, p = 0.047). Actuarial survival of both groups at 5 years was similar (52% vs 58%, p = NS); however, when stratified by preoperative functional class, those with more advanced heart failure preoperatively had superior late survival if their mitral valve was intervened upon. CONCLUSIONS: The late survival of patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing coronary revascularization remains poor; however, intervention on the mitral valve appears to benefit those with symptomatic heart failure.     

Mortality and morbidity among patients who undergo combined valve and coronary artery bypass surgery: Early and late results

Aim: To describe mortality and morbidity early and late after combined valve surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as compared with CABG alone. Patients and methods: All patients from western Sweden in whom CABG in combination with valve surgery or CABG alone was carried out in 1988–1991. Results: Among 2116 patients who underwent CABG, 35 (2%) had this combined with mitral valve surgery and 134 (6%) had this combined with aortic valve surgery, whereas the remaining 92% underwent CABG alone. Patients who underwent combined valve surgery and CABG were older, included more women and had a higher prevalence of previous congestive heart failure and renal dysfunction but on the other hand a less severe coronary artery disease. Among patients who underwent mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG the mortality over the subsequent 5 years was 45%. The corresponding figure for patients who underwent aortic valve surgery in combination with CABG was 24%. Both were higher than for CABG alone (14%; P<0.0001 and P=0.003, respectively). In a stepwise multiple regression model mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG was found to be an independent significant predictor for death but aortic valve surgery in combination with CABG was not. Among patients who underwent mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG and were discharged alive from hospital 77% were rehospitalized during the 2 years following the operation as compared with 48% among patients who underwent aortic valve surgery in combination with CABG and 43% among patients with CABG alone. Multiple regression identified mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG as a significant independent predictor for rehospitalization but not aortic valve plus CABG. Conclusion: Among patients who either underwent CABG in combination with mitral valve surgery or aortic valve surgery or CABG alone, mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG was independently associated with death and rehospitalization, but the combination of aortic valve surgery and CABG was not.     

Surgical treatment of ischaemic valve disease

Mitral valve regurgitation secondary to ischaemic heart disease carries a significant mortality even after open-heart surgery. In this study, 21 patients with mitral regurgitation associated with ischaemic heart disease were evaluated with respect to valvular pathology. Pathological examination of the mitral valve revealed chorda elongation or rupture in seven patients (group 1), papillary muscle dysfunction in 10 (group 2), and papillary muscle rupture in four (group 3). Significant preoperative characteristics in each group were subacute haemodynamic deterioration in group 1, chronic severe left ventricular failure in group 2, and a high incidence of acute renal failure associated with haemodynamic shock in group 3. Mitral valve plasty was performed in six patients and mitral valve replacement, using the St Jude Medical valve, in 15. Fourteen patients underwent mitral valve surgery combined with coronary artery bypass grafting. Mitral plasty was applied to the patients with low left ventricular function with mean(s.d.) fraction shortening of 19.2(6.2)% compared with 30.2(8.4)% in patients with mitral valve replacement. There were no operative deaths. Of four late deaths, two in group 1 resulted from infection and myocardial infarction, respectively, and one in group 2 resulted from arrhythmia. One patient in group 3 died from renal failure. It is suggested that incorporation of these therapeutic concepts may lead to satisfactory results in the surgical treatment of ischaemic mitral regurgitation.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open-heart surgery at the same time

BACKGROUND: Abdominal procedures in patients with coronary artery disease or severe valvular disease have high risk of mortality and morbidity. AIMS: In order to prevent bile peritonitis after cardiac surgery, to reduce the hospitalization course, and to decrease the mortality and morbidity after the surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open-heart surgery were performed at the same time. METHODS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open-heart surgery were performed on two patients who had been referred to Cardiothoracic Ward of Modarres Hospital, Tehran, Iran. RESULTS: Simultaneous classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully performed on two different open-heart patients, one with coronary artery disease for coronary artery bypass surgery and the other with severe mitral valve disorder for mitral valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal procedures are suggested to be done with cardiac surgery at the same time with laparoscopic technique to reduce mortality and morbidity in these patients.     

Surgical results for mitral regurgitation from coronary artery disease

Results of coronary artery bypass grafting with and without mitral valve replacement were analyzed retrospectively in 101 patients with preoperative ischemic mitral regurgitation to determine the effects of severity and surgical treatment of mitral regurgitation on survival. Between 1980 and 1984, a total of 1,475 patients (mean age 59, 77% male) underwent coronary bypass. These patients were divided into three groups: (1) patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent isolated coronary bypass (1,374; 93%), (2) patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent isolated coronary bypass without valve replacement (85; 6%), and (3) patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent combined mitral valve replacement and coronary bypass (16; 1%). Preoperatively, patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation compared to those without regurgitation were significantly older (+6 years, p less than 0.001), had more severe coronary artery disease (p less than 0.001), a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (24% versus 5%, p less than 0.001) and recent myocardial infarction (16% versus 8%, p less than 0.01), and a lower mean ejection fraction (45% versus 61%, p less than 0.001). Operative mortality was significantly increased in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent coronary bypass alone (p less than 0.01) and in those who underwent coronary bypass and mitral valve replacement (p less than 0.01)--11% and 19%, respectively--than in the coronary bypass patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation (3.7%). The severity of mitral regurgitation (0 to 4+) proved to be the most significant predictor of operative mortality. The actuarial survival rate at 5 years for the coronary bypass patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation was 85% compared to 91% (p less than 0.05) for the coronary bypass patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation. These results indicate that patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation have a higher prevalence of cardiac risk factors and are at an increased risk of operative mortality. Although the severity of the ischemic mitral regurgitation was strongly predictive of early survival, it proved to have an unexpectedly modest effect on long-term survival after surgical treatment.     

Mitral repair is superior to replacement when associated with coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of mitral repair and replacement in revascularized patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Combined coronary bypass (CABG) and mitral procedures have been associated with the highest mortality (>10%) in cardiac surgery. Recent studies have suggested that mitral valve replacement (MVR) with sparing of the subvalvular apparatus had comparable results to mitral repair when associated with CABG. METHODS: Over the past 7 years, 54 patients had CABG/mitral repair versus 56 who had CABG/MVR with preservation of the subvalvular apparatus. The groups were similar in age at 69.2 years in the replacement group versus 67.0 in the repair group. We compared these 2 groups based on hospital mortality, incidence of complications including nosocomial infection, neurologic decompensation (stroke), pulmonary complication (pneumonia, atelectasis, and prolonged ventilation), and renal complications (acute renal failure or insufficiency). RESULTS: The mitral repair group had a hospital mortality of 1.9% versus 10.7% in the replacement group (P = 0.05). Infection occurred in 9% of repairs compared with 13% of replacements (P = 0.59). The incidence of stroke was no different between groups (2 of 54 repairs vs. 2 of 56 replacements, P = 1.00). Pulmonary complication rate was 39% in repairs versus 32% in replacements (P = 0.59). Worsening renal function occurred in 15% of repairs versus 18% of replacements (P = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Mitral repair is superior to mitral replacement when associated with coronary artery disease in terms of perioperative morbidity and hospital mortality. Although preservation of the subvalvular apparatus with MVR has a theoretical advantage in terms of ventricular function, mitral repair clearly adds a survival benefit in patients with concomitant ischemic cardiac disease.     

Multivariable prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with aortic and mitral valve surgery in Northern New England

BACKGROUND: Predicting risk for aortic and mitral valve surgery is important both for informed consent of patients and objective review of surgical outcomes. Development of reliable prediction rules requires large data sets with appropriate risk factors that are available before surgery. METHODS: Data from eight Northern New England Medical Centers in the period January 1991 through December 2001 were analyzed on 8943 heart valve surgery patients aged 30 years and older. There were 5793 cases of aortic valve replacement and 3150 cases of mitral valve surgery (repair or replacement). Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between risk factors and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: In the multivariable analysis, 11 variables in the aortic model (older age, lower body surface area, prior cardiac operation, elevated creatinine, prior stroke, New York Heart Association [NYHA] class IV, congestive heart failure [CHF], atrial fibrillation, acuity, year of surgery, and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting) and 10 variables in the mitral model (female sex, older age, diabetes, coronary artery disease, prior cerebrovascular accident, elevated creatinine, NYHA class IV, CHF, acuity, and valve replacement) remained independent predictors of the outcome. The mathematical models were highly significant predictors of the outcome, in-hospital mortality, and the results are in general agreement with those of others. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the aortic model was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.77), and for the mitral model, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.81). The goodness-of-fit statistic for the aortic model was chi(2) [8 df] = 11.88, p = 0.157, and for the mitral model it was chi(2) [8 df] = 5.45, p = 0.708. CONCLUSIONS: We present results and methods for use in day-to-day practice to calculate patient-specific in-hospital mortality after aortic and mitral valve surgery, by the logistic equation for each model or a simple scoring system with a look-up table for mortality rate.