Basiliximab reduces the incidence of acute cellular rejection in live-related-donor kidney transplantation: a three-year prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to investigate the benefit of basiliximab induction therapy in living-related-donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: One hundred adult recipients of a first kidney allograft were randomized into two treatment groups, one to receive basiliximab and the second as a control. All patients received maintenance triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, cyclosporine microemulsion and azathioprine). The patients were followed up for a minimum of three years. The end points for evaluation included the incidence of acute rejection episodes, severity of rejection, cumulative steroid dose, patients' and graft survival. RESULTS: Basiliximab significantly reduced the proportion of patients who experienced an acute rejection in the first year (18/50) compared to the control group (31/50). At three years there were 26 acute rejections in the basiliximab group and 36 in control group. The cumulative steroid dose at three and 12 months was significantly lower in the basiliximab group. The overall incidence of post-transplant complications was comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic basiliximab is well tolerated and significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes in living-related-donor kidney transplantation.     

Long-term evaluation of basiliximab induction therapy in live donor kidney transplantation: a five-year prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The long-term evaluation of basiliximab induction therapy has not been addressed yet. We aim to evaluate its long-term effects in living related donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: 100 adult recipients with their first kidney allograft were randomized into two treatment groups--one group received basiliximab and the second served as a control. All patients received a maintenance triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, cyclosporine microemulsion and azathioprine) and were closely followed for 5 years. RESULTS: Basiliximab significantly reduced the proportion of patients who experienced an acute rejection in the first year (18/50) when compared to the control group (31/50) and in 5 years (27/50) when compared to (36/50) the controls. The cumulative steroid dose used throughout the study was significantly lower in the basiliximab group. The overall incidence of post-transplant complications was comparable between the two treatment groups. There was no significant difference in patients and graft survival; 5-year patient and graft survival were 100 and 86% for basiliximab, and 96 and 88% for the control group respectively. CONCLUSION: Although routine basiliximab induction significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection, its beneficial long-term effects on graft function and patient and graft survival are not yet evident.     

Reduced acute rejection and superior 1-year renal allograft survival with basiliximab in patients with diabetes mellitus. The Global Simulect Study Group

BACKGROUND: Renal allograft recipients with diabetes mellitus often demonstrate poorer clinical outcomes than nondiabetic patients. Basiliximab (Simulect), a chimeric anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, reduced the incidence of acute rejection in renal allograft recipients in 2 multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase III trials. METHODS: An analysis of pooled results from the 2 trials was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of basiliximab with placebo in renal transplant recipients with and without prior diabetes. Patients received either basiliximab (20 mg on day 0 and day 4 posttransplantation) or placebo in combination with cyclosporine for microemulsion (Neoral) and steroids. RESULTS: A total of 722 patients (150 diabetic, 572 nondiabetic) were eligible for intent-to-treat analysis. At 12 months, basiliximab as compared with placebo reduced the proportion of patients experiencing first acute rejection by 41% in diabetics (P<0.01) and by 29% in nondiabetics (P<0.001). Biopsy-confirmed rejection was reduced by 44% in diabetics (P<0.01) and by 26% in nondiabetics (P<0.01). The first acute rejection episode requiring augmented immunosuppression other than steroids was reduced by 49% in diabetics (P<0.01) and by 41% in nondiabetics (P<0.001); death, graft loss, or first rejection episode was reduced by 43% in diabetics (P=0.001) and by 22% in nondiabetics (P<0.01). Superior graft survival was maintained in diabetic recipients treated with basiliximab versus placebo (96% vs. 86%; P=0.022). There were no significant differences in safety between basiliximab and placebo in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab is associated with a significant reduction in acute rejection and an excellent safety profile in renal transplant recipients with and without diabetes mellitus. Superior graft survival was evident in diabetic patients.     

A randomized, double-blind trial of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis plus triple therapy in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study was performed to assess whether immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab (Simulect) could reduce the incidence of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine (Neoral), steroids, and azathioprine. METHODS: Three hundred forty patients received either placebo or basiliximab at a dose of 20 mg, given intravenously on days 0 and 4. All patients received cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine. The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute rejection at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included the safety and tolerability of basiliximab and placebo, 1-year patient and graft survival, and significant medical events up to 12 months. RESULTS: During the first 6 months posttransplantation, acute rejection occurred in 20.8% of patients given basiliximab versus 34.9% of patients administered placebo (P=0.005). Similarly, there was a reduction in biopsy-proven acute rejection at 6 months in the patients receiving basiliximab (P=0.023). One-year patient survival was 97.6% with basiliximab and 97.1% with placebo, graft survival was 91.5% versus 88.4%, respectively (NS). The adverse-events profile of patients treated with basiliximab was indistinguishable from that of patients treated with placebo. The number of patients with infections was similar (65.5% for basiliximab vs. 65.7% for placebo), including cytomegalovirus infections (17.3% vs. 14.5%, P=0.245). Nine neoplasms (three in the basiliximab group, six in the placebo arm) were recorded up to 1 year from transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab in combination with cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine triple therapy was highly effective in reducing the incidence of acute renal allograft rejection without increasing the incidence of infections and other side effects.     

Basiliximab versus daclizumab combined with triple immunosuppression in deceased donor renal graft recipients

In this prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center study, we compared the efficacy and safety of two anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies among adult recipients of at least 1 HLA-mismatched deceased donor renal grafts. Eligible patients were randomized to induction with either basiliximab or daclizumab. Both groups received cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. An intent-to-treat analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of acute rejection episodes, the renal graft function, the safety, and the patient and graft survivals. Among 127 patients, six (10.0%) and seven (11.5%) patients experienced biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months, in the basiliximab and the daclizumab groups, respectively. Two renal grafts were lost in the basiliximab and six in the daclizumab cohort, one of them due to rejection. One basiliximab and two daclizumab patients died. Hospital treatment was required for 25 and 33 infections in basiliximab and daclizumab groups, respectively. One basal cell carcinoma of skin was detected. One hypersensitivity reaction was observed with daclizumab. At 12 months, serum creatinine was 101+/-28 micromol/L with basiliximab and 109+/-41 micromol/L with daclizumab. Patient survival was 98.4% with basiliximab and 96.7% with daclizumab, and graft survival was 96.8% versus 90.8%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the groups. Basiliximab or daclizumab combined with triple therapy was an efficient and safe immunosuppression strategy, demonstrated with low incidence of acute rejection episodes, an acceptable adverse event profile, excellent graft function, and high survival rates in adult recipients within the first year after deceased donor renal transplantation.     

Basiliximab induction therapy for live donor kidney transplantation: a long-term follow-up of prospective randomized controlled study

Background/Aims  The effect of basiliximab induction therapy on long-term patient and graft survival is not yet clear. We aimed to evaluate if there is any advantage of routine basiliximab induction on the long-term outcome of living related donor kidney transplantation. Methods  One hundred adult recipients with their first kidney allograft were randomized into two treatment groups, one group received basiliximab and the second served as a control. All patients received a maintenance triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, cyclosporine (CsA) micro-emulsion and azathioprinep) and were followed up thoroughly for 7 years. Results  Basiliximab significantly reduced the proportion of patients who experienced acute rejection in the first year (18/50) when compared to the control group (31/50), and in 7 years (28/50) when compared to (37/50) in controls. The cumulative steroid dose used throughout the whole study period was significantly lower in the basiliximab group. The overall incidence of post-transplant complications was comparable among the two treatment groups. There was no significant difference in patient or graft survival; 7 years patient and graft survival were 92, 76% for basiliximab and 92, 80% for the control group, respectively. Conclusion  Routine basiliximab induction significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection without any noticeble beneficial effect on the long-term renal transplantation outcome.     

Randomized double-blind study of immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab,a chimeric anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody,in combination with mycophenolate mofetil-containing triple therapy in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection remains a major problem in renal transplantation. Immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab (Simulect) has achieved significant reductions in acute rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients receiving dual immunosuppression. This study explored the tolerability and cumulative benefit of combining basiliximab with triple-drug therapy-cyclosporine (USP Modified, Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 123 kidney transplant recipients received either basiliximab at 20 mg before transplantation (day 0) and 20 mg on day 4 (n=59), or placebo (n=64). All received triple-drug immunosuppression and were followed for 6 months. RESULTS: Tolerability of basiliximab was equivalent to placebo, with no increase in serious adverse events, infection, malignancy, or posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. At 6 months, there were trends in favor of basiliximab over placebo in the incidences of first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (15.3% vs. 26.6%, P=NS) and of acute rejection treated with antibody (5.1% vs. 15.6%, P=NS). Kaplan-Meier estimates at 4 weeks and 6 months were significantly in favor of basiliximab treatment for first acute rejection, biopsy-confirmed rejection, rejection episodes treated with antibody therapy, and treatment failure. Renal function improved more rapidly in the basiliximab group, with mean creatinine clearance at week 2 being 54.7 mL/min versus 43.2 mL/min for placebo (P=0.034). At 12 months, patient survival was 100% in both groups; graft survival was 94.9% with basiliximab and 92.2% with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab immunoprophylaxis is safe, well tolerated, and shows a trend toward reduction in number of acute rejection episodes in renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.     

Basiliximab versus antithymocyte globulin for prevention of acute renal allograft rejection.

BACKGROUND: Basiliximab (Simulect), a high-affinity chimeric, monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of human interleukin-2 receptor (CD25), reduces the incidence of acute renal allograft rejection when used in combination with cyclosporine (Neoral) and steroids. This study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of basiliximab to polyclonal anti-T-cell (ATGAM) therapy for the prevention of acute rejection in de novo renal transplant recipients. METHODS: This 1-year, open-label, randomized trial was conducted in recipients of cadaveric or living-related donor renal transplants. All patients received cyclosporine (Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept, MMF), and corticosteroids. Patients who were randomized to basiliximab therapy received a 20 mg i.v. bolus dose on days 0 and 4, and the majority of patients were initiated on cyclosporine within 48 hr of transplantation. Patients who were randomized to antithymocyte globulin therapy (ATGAM, ATG) received 15 mg/day i.v. within 48 hr of transplant and continued treatment for up to 14 days; ATG was stopped once therapeutic cyclosporine blood levels were achieved. The initiation of cyclosporine use was delayed in the ATG group until renal function was established (serum creatinine <3.0 mg/dl or 50% fall from baseline). RESULTS: Of the 138 randomized patients, 135 received at least 1 dose of study medication (70 patients, basiliximab; 65 patients, ATG). Demographic characteristics were similar between the basiliximab and ATG-treatment groups. At 12 months, the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 19% and 20%, respectively, in the basiliximab and ATG groups. Although the overall profile of adverse events was similar between basiliximab- and ATG-treated patients, adverse events considered by the investigators to be associated with the study drug occurred more often among patients receiving ATG (42% vs. 11% with basiliximab). CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab combined with early initiation of cyclosporine therapy resulted in low acute rejection rates similar to those achieved with ATG combined with delayed cyclosporine. Basiliximab therapy showed an excellent safety profile, with no increases in malignancies, infections, or deaths. Based on its convenient two-dose, body-weight independent regimen and comparable effectiveness to ATG, basiliximab is an attractive choice for the prevention of acute rejection episodes in renal transplant patients.     

Triple immunosuppression with or without basiliximab in pediatric renal transplantation: acute rejection rates at one year

Acute rejection (AR) is a major determinant of chronic allograft dysfunction and graft survival. This study evaluated the effect of basiliximab on AR in pediatric renal transplantation on triple immunosuppression. Forty-three transplantations (25 males and 18 females; mean age 14.9 +/- 3.6 years) were performed between 1996 and 2002. Thirteen of the grafts came from cadaveric donors and 30 from living-related donors. All patients were placed on immunosuppression with prednisolone + (azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil) + (cyclosporine [CYA] or tacrolimus). Basiliximab was also administered in 20 cases. The respective rates of biopsy-proven AR in the basiliximab group (BG) and the standard-regimen group (N-BG) were 0% vs 17.4% (P >.05) at 1 month posttransplantation; 0% vs 26.1% (P <.05) at 3 months; 0% vs 26.1% (P <.05) at 6 months, and 7.1% vs 26.1% (P >.05) at 12 months. In the N-BG group the 1- and 3-year graft survival rates were 91.3% (21/23) and 83.3% (15/18), respectively. The mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the first year after the transplantation was 75 +/- 33 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the N-BG and 98 +/- 21 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the BG patients (P <.05).Basiliximab significantly reduced the rates of acute rejection at 3 and 6 months after pediatric renal transplantation. The GFR in the first year was significantly higher among the patients treated with basiliximab, which was well tolerated by all patients and caused no significant adverse effects. The effect of basiliximab on long-term graft survival and chronic allograft dysfunction deserves further investigation.     

Single centre experience with basiliximab in paediatric renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Introduction of IL-2-receptor antagonists has led to significantly decreasing numbers of acute rejection episodes in renal transplantation in adults. No data are available in paediatric recipients. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2000, 78 renal transplantations were performed in 77 children aged 0.5-16 years. Basiliximab, cyclosporin A (CsA) and prednisolone were administered in 48 children (age 7.8 +/- 5.3 years) and compared with 29 children (age 7.3 +/- 5.2 years) receiving CsA and prednisolone only. The number of acute rejections, survival, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and side effects were determined for 3 years after transplantation. RESULTS: All 77 patients survived the observation period. One year graft survival in the basiliximab group was 95%, which is similar to the comparison group (93%). Children receiving basiliximab showed a lower incidence of acute rejection than the comparison group (14% vs 34%). The calculated GFR was lower in the basiliximab group when discharging from hospital, with 51 compared with 66 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in the non-basiliximab group. This was associated with higher CsA trough levels (214 vs 174 ng/ml) in the basiliximab patients. After 1 year the GFR was comparable in both groups (58 vs 52 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab offers excellent allograft survival, a lower incidence of acute rejections and almost no side effects. Therefore it can be recommended for routine immunosuppressive therapy in paediatric renal transplantation.     

Basiliximab: efficacy and tolerability in adults and children

An open, single arm, prospective clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of basiliximab (Simulect) combined with cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), steroids, and azathioprine was performed in four centers in Chile, two adult and two pediatric. The 23 patients who were enrolled were followed for 12 months. There were four acute rejection episodes (three adults and one child) and three graft losses (two adults and one child) during the study. Renal function in both adult and pediatric patients at 6 and 12 months was good. Basiliximab was well tolerated. The incidence of infections was low, with only one CMV infection. There were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of acute rejection episodes among renal allograft recipients treated with basiliximab is low, showing that the drug is well tolerated. In particular the number of CMV infections is extremely low.     

Tacrolimus-Basiliximab versus Cyclosporine-Basiliximab in renal transplantation "de novo": acute rejection and complications

BACKGROUND: Optimal immunosuppression is essential to maintain kidney allograft viability but minimizing toxicity is also fundamental. OBJECTIVE: This article compares immunosuppressants, corticosteroids, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and basiliximab, which are used in the treatment regimens for renal transplantation. The analyses evaluated their effectiveness to prevent acute rejection episodes and to reduce the appearance of other complications, mainly infectious disease complications. METHODS: Ninety-five patients were analysed during the first year after primary renal transplantation. These patients were included in a random way in 3 different groups according to the immunosuppressant drug therapy: Group I (35 patients) received corticosteroids + CsA; Group II (35 patients) received corticosteroids + CsA + Basiliximab; Group III (25 patients) received corticosteroids + Tacrolimus + Basiliximab. RESULTS: Among the 95 patients, 9 presented with an acute rejection episode in Group I. None in Group II, and one in group III. With reference to the infectious disease complications, the incidence of oral herpes was one case in Group I, 4 cases in Group II, and 2 cases in group III. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with Basiliximab produced a significantly lower incidence of acute rejection cases and an increase in infectious disease complications, such as lip herpes.     

Induction therapy by anti-thymocyte globulin (rabbit) versus basiliximab in deceased donor renal transplants and the effect on delayed graft function and outcomes

The use of induction therapy significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection (AR) episodes posttransplantation and prevents delayed graft function (DGF). In our program, all adult deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients receive immunosuppression induction therapy with either Basiliximab (anti-CD25 Ab) or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (RATG). Our protocol is risk adjusted such that patients who are at a higher risk for DGF or AR received RATG and all other patients receive anti-CD25 Ab. We hypothesized that treating our higher-risk patients with RATG induction at the time of transplantation would lead to a lower rate of DGF and better outcomes. From August 1, 2005 through August 31, 2010, 116 consecutive adult patients received a DDKT in a single academic transplantation center. All DDKT patients received induction with RATG or anti-CD25 Ab. The induction decision was made prior to transplantation based on donor and recipient risk factors for AR and DGF. Transplants that were deemed at higher risk for DGF or AR based on donor factors or recipient factors received RATG. Medical records and patient databases were reviewed retrospectively. The use of RATG in higher-risk recipients for DGF and AR did not significantly reduce the DGF rate. At 6 months the function of the allograft function measured as creatinine clearance or serum creatinine was lower in the RATG group than the patients who received anti-CD25 Ab induction. The choice of induction therapy did not improve outcomes in high-risk patients in this short-term study.     

Reduction of the occurrence of acute cellular rejection among renal allograft recipients treated with basiliximab, a chimeric anti-interleukin-2-receptor monoclonal antibody. United States Simulect Renal Study Group

BACKGROUND: A double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study was performed to assess whether basiliximab, a chimeric anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients. METHODS: A total of 348 patients were randomized into two demographically matched, equally sized groups treated with either basiliximab or placebo. The dose of basiliximab-20-mg infusions on day 0 and day 4-was selected to block detection of interleukin-2 receptor on 97% of peripheral blood lymphocytes for 30-45 days. All patients received immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) and steroids. An intent-to-treat analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of posttransplant acute rejection episodes, patient and graft survival rates, and the safety and tolerability of basiliximab. RESULTS: Among the eligible 346 patients equally divided into the two treatment groups, basiliximab reduced the proportion of patients who experienced biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes by 28%: 61 (35.3%) basiliximab vs. 85 (49.1%) placebo (P=0.009). Graft losses occurred in 9 (5.2%) basiliximab-treated and 12 (6.9%) placebo-treated patients. Five (2.9%) deaths in the basiliximab group and seven (4.0%) in the placebo group occurred. Compared with placebo, a higher fraction of basiliximab patients produced urine in the operating room, and a significantly lower fraction had renal dysfunction in the first month (serum creatinine > or =5 mg(dl) and between 1 and 12 months (serum creatinine > or =3 mg/dl). During the first 12 months, 94 (54%) basiliximab-treated patients experienced serious adverse events, compared with 106 (61%) who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic basiliximab therapy is well tolerated, has an adverse event profile comparable to placebo, and significantly reduces the number of acute rejection episodes in renal allograft patients within the first year after transplantation.     

Effective immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab plus triple therapy in renal transplantation: five-year single-center experience

We studied prospectively the efficacy and safety of basiliximab combined with triple immunosuppression in adult recipients of > or = 1 HLA-mismatched deceased donor renal grafts. All studied patients received equal immunosuppressive drugs: 20 mg infusion of basiliximab on day 0 and on day 4, cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. An analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of acute rejection episodes, safety of this therapy, renal graft function, and patient and graft survivals. One hundred seventy-two patients were studied. The HLA-antigen mismatches were 2.9 +/- 0.9 (mean +/- SD), and the cold ischemia time was 22.0 +/- 7.5 hours. Fifty-three (31.5%) patients experienced delayed graft function. At 12 months, 5 (3.0%) patients experienced acute rejection. Six renal grafts were lost, but not from rejection. Two patients died. Sixty-six infections required treatment in the hospital. One carcinoma of cervix (in situ) and two basal cell carcinomas of skin were detected. Hypersensitivity reactions and cytokine-release syndrome were not observed. At 12 months, serum creatinine was significantly higher (119 +/- 46 micromol/L; P < .001) in patients with delayed graft function than in patients with immediate graft function (99 +/- 26 micromol/L). Patient and graft survivals were 98.8% and 97.1%, respectively. Basiliximab combined with this triple therapy was an efficient and safe immunosuppression strategy, demonstrated with very low incidence of acute rejections, an acceptable adverse event profile, excellent graft function, and high short-term survival rates in adult recipients of deceased donor renal transplant.     

Immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab,a chimeric anti[ndash ]interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody,in combination with azathioprine-containing triple therapy in liver transplant recipients

Acute graft rejection remains a major problem among additional sequelae in liver transplant recipients. Basiliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody with high affinity for the CD25 chain of the interleukin-2 receptor, has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients. This single-arm, open-label, multicenter study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis in adult patients undergoing first elective liver transplantation. One hundred one patients (70 hepatitis C virus [HCV]-negative patients, 31 HCV-positive patients) were administered basiliximab, 20 mg, by intravenous bolus injection the day of transplantation (day 0) and day 4. In addition, all patients were administered triple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine. The efficacy of basiliximab was assessed by conventional parameters, and tolerability was assessed by the incidence of adverse events, infections, and laboratory test result abnormalities. At 6 months, the incidence of first acute biopsy-confirmed rejection episodes was 22.8%. Rejections were more frequent in the HCV-positive (29.0%) than HCV-negative subgroup (20.0%; P = .441). No rejection episode was graded histologically as severe, and no patient required antibody therapy for the management of acute rejection. Ten patients (9.9%) required treatment with tacrolimus for acute rejection episodes. Patient and graft survival rates at 12 months were 90.1% and 88.1%, respectively. Basiliximab caused no injection-site reactions, anaphylaxis, or cytokine release syndrome. Five malignancies were reported at 12 months: of these, three malignancies predated transplantation surgery. Compared with earlier studies, the addition of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis to triple immunosuppressive therapy provides increased efficacy in reducing the incidence of acute rejection episodes, with no clinically significant increase in adverse events. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:123-131.)     

A multicenter,open-label,pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic safety,and tolerability study of basiliximab (Simulect) in pediatric de novo renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Basiliximab (Simulect) has been shown to be safe and effective in adult renal transplant recipients, when used in combination with cyclosporine (Neoral) and corticosteroids. We report on the safety and preliminary efficacy of basiliximab in pediatric de novo renal transplant recipients. METHODS: This was an open-label, 12-month study of basiliximab in 41 patients (2 cohorts: <9 and 9 to <16 years). In phase 1, two intravenous (IV) bolus injections of basiliximab (12 mg/m ) were administered (before and 4 days postsurgery). In phase 2, two injections (<40 kg, 10 mg and > or =40 kg, 20 mg) were administered at the same time points. Most patients (26/41 [63%]) received cadaveric kidneys. Almost half of the patients had three human leukocyte antigen mismatches with the organ donors. Concurrent immunosuppression included Neoral and corticosteroids. Azathioprine was allowed after 28 days. RESULTS: All patients completed the 1-year study. The acute tolerability of basiliximab via IV bolus injection was good, without evidence of cytokine-release syndrome or acute local reactions. All patients experienced adverse events, but most (71%) were mild or asymptomatic. No deaths or malignancies occurred. The incidence and types of serious adverse events (59%) and serious infections (44%) were as expected in this patient population, and few were drug-related (7% and 5%, respectively). Thirty-eight patients (93%) had infections, mostly urinary tract infections, as expected for renal transplant patients. Six patients (15%) had drug-related adverse events. Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes occurred in 6/41 (15%) of patients during the first 6 months posttransplantation and in 9/41 (22%) patients during the first 12 months. Five patients (12%) experienced graft loss, none of which were preceded by acute rejection episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab is safe and well tolerated when administered by IV bolus injection in de novo pediatric renal transplant recipients. These preliminary data suggest that basiliximab, given in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids, is an effective immunosuppressive regimen for the prevention of acute rejection in pediatric renal transplantation.     

Use of Basiliximab Induction in Low–Immunological Risk Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression

Basiliximab induction treatment has been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes without the secondary side effects observed with antilymphocyte polyclonal antibodies. We analyzed our experience with basiliximab induction associated with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression among low–immunological risk renal transplant recipients. We retrospectively analyzed 55 renal transplantation patients of low inmunological risk who received organs from donors younger than 55 years. We compared a group of 21 patients (38.9%; group 1) treated with basiliximab (Simulect, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) with 33 patients (61.1%; group 2) without induction. The patient groups did not differ in recipient age (46.39 ± 11.1 in group 1 vs 41.82 ± 11.02 years in group 2; P = .25), donor age (36.71 ± 14.72 vs 35.09 ± 14.63 years; P = .69), or recipient and donor gender. No differences were observed in dose or tacrolimus levels during follow-up. The incidences of delayed graft function (DGF; 28.6% vs 28.1%; P = .97) and of acute rejection episodes (9.5% vs 15.6%; P = .52) were similar in both groups. Serum creatinine and proteinuria levels (P > .05) and hospital admissions due to infections (36.4 vs 35.7%; P = .97) were also similar in both groups. At 1 year graft survival rates were 92% and 96% (P = .97) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Considering our findings and the costs of basiliximab treatment, we conclude that routine administration of basiliximab cannot be justified in young, low–immunological risk transplant recipients undergoing tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.     

Effect of basiliximab on renal allograft rejection within 1 year after transplantation

Basiliximab is widely used in clinical practice for initial immunosuppressive treatment of renal transplant recipients, seeking to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes without adverse events. This retrospective study included 123 renal allograft recipients transplanted at a single center. All were followed for longer than 1 year after transplantation and treated with calcineurin inhibitor and steroid (methylprednisolone) for prophylactic immunosuppression, but basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil were optional. We compared the outcomes of renal transplant recipients who were versus treated were not with basiliximab as initial immunosuppressive therapy. Basiliximab was used for initial immunosuppression in 42 patients. Their maintenance immunosuppressive treatment included triple (n = 44) or double (n = 79) regimens, including a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine [n = 87] or tacrolimus [n = 36]), methylprednisolone with or without mycophenolate mofetil. Twenty-six (21.1%) patients had a rejection episode within 1 year after transplantation and 22 (17.9%) had infections. Within the first year after transplantation the patients who were treated with basiliximab showed fewer rejection episodes (n = 6, 14.3%) than the patients without this therapy (n = 20, 24.7%), which was not statistically significant (P = .245). However, basiliximab significantly affected the occurrence of rejection episodes among the double immunosuppressive regimen group (P = .006), but not the triple regimen group (P = .098) without an impact on infection episodes (P value of double, triple = .291, .414) within 1 year after transplantation. We concluded that basiliximab was more useful for the recipients treated with double immunosuppression with a calcineurin inhibitor and steroid than for those on a triple regimen including mycophenolate mofetil.     

Immunosuppression for delayed or slow graft function in primary cadaveric renal transplantation: use of low dose tacrolimus therapy with post-operative administration of anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody

BACKGROUND: Patients who develop delayed graft function (DGF) following cadaveric renal transplantation have inferior survival to those who do not. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) may prolong recovery from DGF. Patients with DGF are therefore routinely treated with either polyclonal antilymphocyte preparations or monoclonal anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies and delayed introduction of CNI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody basiliximab (BSLIX) started post-operatively in patients at high risk for DGF combined with low dose tacrolimus (TAC). METHODS: Patients who received a primary cadaveric renal transplant only after August 1998 were included in this retrospective study (n = 143). All patients received TAC and mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) pre-operatively. At 6 h post-operatively, graft function was assessed clinically by urine output and serum creatinine. Those patients who had a urine output < 300 cc/6 h or a rising serum creatinine were presumed to be at risk for DGF (n = 46). These patients were treated with 20 mg BSLIX and had TAC dose reduced to maintain a trough blood level of < 5 ng/mL. Basiliximab was repeated at day 5. Patients not felt to be at risk for DGF were treated with standard TAC dose with trough level target of 9-12 ng/mL. Patients at risk were classified as DGF if they needed dialysis or as slow graft function (SGF) if they did not. The combined group (SGF/DGF) were analysed together. Patients with SGF/DGF had their TAC dose increased to achieve trough levels of 9-12 ng/mL when renal function improved. Patient groups were compared for demographics, need for dialysis, serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), TAC trough levels, MMF dosage, complications and 1- and 2-yr actuarial graft survival. RESULTS: Patients with SGF/DGF had a longer length of stay (8 vs. 5.7 d), were more likely to be black (41.3 vs. 25.7%), and required more post-operative haemodialysis (HD) (52.2 vs. 4.1%). SGF/DGF and non-SGF/DGF patients had similar rates of rejection (28.2 vs. 19.6%, p = 0.28) and steroid resistant rejection (SRR) (6.5 vs. 2.1%, p = 0.32). There were no differences in the rate of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (4.3 vs. 6.1%). Serum creatinine was higher and GFR lower at all time points in the SGF/DGF patients. The 1 and 2 yr actuarial survival in the non-SGF/DGF patients was 97.6 and 97.6% compared with 1 and 2 yrs actuarial survival of 94.1% and 80.0% in the SGF/DGF patients, p = 0.04. There were no differences in patient survival. There were no differences in actuarial survival for the SGF/DGF patients who received dialysis compared with those who did not receive dialysis. Comparison of patients who received HD (n = 28) to those who did not (n = 115), regardless of group demonstrated no difference in 1 and 2 yrs actuarial survival, 100 and 94.1% in HD patients vs. 98.2 and 92.5% in non-HD patients. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical diagnosis of SGF/DGF can be made 6 h post-operatively based on urine output and serum creatinine. Basiliximab can be started post-operatively in these patients and decreased levels of TAC can be used to achieve acceptably low rates of rejection in these patients. However, SGF/DGF patients, regardless of their need for dialysis, have worse function at 1 yr and lower 2-yr actuarial graft survival compared with non-SGF/DGF patients. Most of the poor survival can be attributed to the SGF group. Further strategies to either prevent SGF/DGF or to optimize treatment in these patients are needed.