Acoustic neuroma surgery: use of cochlear nerve action potential monitoring for hearing preservation

OBJECTIVES: To compare the hearing preservation results obtained with use of two intraoperative eighth nerve monitoring methods, cochlear nerve action potential (CNAP) and auditory brainstem response (ABR), during complete acoustic neuroma (AN) resection. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty-three consecutive patients who underwent hearing preservation AN surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Intraoperative monitoring by CNAP and/or ABR during AN resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Postoperative hearing. Hearing preservation was considered achieved for pure-tone average < or =50 dB and speech discrimination > or =50%. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Monitoring was successfully performed in 23 of 25 patients (92%) who underwent attempted CNAP monitoring and 13 of 27 (48%) who underwent attempted ABR monitoring. When tumor size was < or =20 mm in greatest dimension, hearing preservation was achieved in 12 of 18 patients (67%) monitored with CNAP, versus 2 of 8 patients (25%) not monitored with CNAP (p = 0.05). Monitoring by ABR did not improve hearing preservation rates compared with those not monitored with ABR (40% vs. 63%). At the completion of surgery, the presence or absence of CNAP predicted the presence or absence of hearing preservation in 18 of 23 cases (p = 0.01), while ABR successfully predicted hearing results in 10 of 13 cases (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When CNAP and ABR monitoring techniques during AN surgery were compared, CNAP was more frequently obtainable. Monitoring by CNAP was significantly associated with a higher chance of hearing preservation. Monitoring by ABR did not have a positive influence on hearing preservation results. Both ABR and CNAP were useful for predicting postoperative hearing.     

两种听觉监护在听神经瘤术中的联合应用及评价

目的　探讨听神经瘤手术中听觉监护的意义。比较听性脑干反应（ABR）和蜗神经动作电位（cochlear nerve action potential,CNAP）在听觉监护应用中的价值。方法　回顾性分析我中心12例保留听力手术的听神经瘤患者资料及术中情况,患者术前均有实用听力（AAO-HNS分级A级、B级）,可引出ABR波形,V波分化可,所有手术均采取乙状窦后径路摘除肿瘤。所有患者均全程ABR监护,术中打开脑膜后联合监测CNAP。结果　手术过程中所有患者ABR波形较术前基线均有不同程度的变化,可记录到V波潜伏期均较基线延长（0.68±0.41）ms。CNAP波幅个体差异性较大,可记录到的P1潜伏期均较基线延长（0.25±0.16）ms。12例中有8例（66.7%）患者术后保留可用听力;另外4例（33.3%）术后达不到可用听力,此4例患者ABR表现为3例V波消失,1例V波潜伏期延长。CNAP表现为2例CNAP的P1消失,2例P1延长。电钻钻磨造成的震动和噪声、手术时神经被牵拉或热损伤后等急性损伤后ABR和CNAP波幅均出现短时间急剧下降,手术暂停5 min后,部分患者波幅可在一定程度恢复。结论　听神经瘤手术中ABR和CNAP对于听觉监护均有一定意义。ABR波形稳定可靠,但叠加时间相对较长;CNAP叠加快速,可提升监测灵敏度,但波形变异度较大。电钻钻磨造成的震动和噪声、操作过程中对神经组织的牵拉以及热损伤均被及时监控,两者联合应用可提升听神经瘤手术的听觉功能保留率。     

听神经瘤术中听力监测及术后听力保留影响因素分析

目的探讨听神经瘤术中听力监测的应用及术后听力保留的可能影响因素。方法16例采用乙状窦后入路手术切除听神经瘤的成年患者,分为两组,术中采用听性脑干反应(auditory brainstem response,ABR)和耳蜗电图(electrocochleogram,ECochG)联合监测为监测组(8例),未监测者为未监测组(8例),比较两组患者术后听力保留情况,采用单因素分析,分析影响听力保留的可能因素,包括:年龄、病程、肿瘤大小、术前纯音听阈和言语识别率、术中是否行ABR和ECochG联合监测、内听道是否扩大、肿瘤和神经是否粘连等。结果前庭诱发肌源性电位(VEMP)提示16例患者肿瘤来源于前庭上神经,监测组中6例术中及术毕ABR波Ⅰ、Ⅴ和复合动作电位(CAP)持续存在,术后听力保留;1例术中ABR波Ⅰ、Ⅴ和ECochG CAP持续存在,但术后无可用听力;1例术中切除肿瘤时ECochG与基线重复性良好,ABR波V消失,手术结束波V仍未恢复;监测组术后听力保留率为75.0%(6/8),未监测组术后无一例保留听力,差异有统计学意义(P=0.007)。单因素分析显示,年龄、病程、肿瘤大小、术前纯音听阈以及内听道扩大与术后听力保留率无关(P>0.05),术前言语识别率、术中ABR和ECochG联合监测、肿瘤和神经粘连与否与术后听力保留率相关(P<0.05)。结论听神经瘤切除术中ABR和ECochG连续监测对指导手术和提高术后听力保留率有重要意义,肿瘤与神经粘连是术后听力保留的重要影响因素,手术技巧、术前听力、肿瘤大小、内听道扩大等是否是术后听力保留的影响因素需扩大样本进一步研究验证。     

听神经瘤术中连续听力监测的初步探讨

目的探讨听神经瘤外科术中连续听力监测的意义。方法采用乙状窦人路，在听性脑干反应（auditory brainstem response，ABR）和耳蜗电图（electrocochleogram，ECochG）监测下完成的听神经瘤切除术10例。对手术过程和术后听力结合术中监测进行分析。结果10例听神经瘤术前听力A级3耳，B级4耳，C级3耳（美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会分级标准）。术前的ABR检查Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ波存在者5耳（A级3耳，B级2耳），仅见Ⅰ波者5耳（B级2耳，C级3耳）。麻醉后手术前的监测显示：Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ波存在者2耳，仅Ⅰ波存在者6耳，以复合动作电位（compound action potential，CAP）的N1波代替波Ⅰ；无波形者2耳。术后听力保留2耳，肿瘤均〈2cm，术前听力都为A级；连续听力监测显示1耳术中及术毕时Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ持续存在，1耳Ⅰ、Ⅲ波存在，Ⅴ波消失；术后听力均为A级。听力未保留8耳，其中6耳术中监测时仅CAP的N1（波Ⅰ）存在，手术过程中夹内听动脉或处理内耳道处肿瘤时，4耳CAP波幅明显下降，甚至下降至0，术毕又恢复至术前的50％～60％或正常；1耳蜗神经与肿瘤一并切除，但CAP始终存在；1耳因牵拉脑干侧的耳蜗神经，CAP波幅降至0，手术结束亦未恢复。2耳为全身麻醉后术前监测中未引出任何波形者，其中1耳术中切除部分肿瘤后，出现CAP波，但波幅低，直至术毕；1耳始终未出现波形。结论联合应用ABR和ECochG术中监测，对提高听力保护率有积极意义，能及时反映术中与保留听力相关的敏感手术步骤，然而外科医师的熟练的解剖和精确的手术技巧是手术成功的最基本因素。     

The efficacy of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in acoustic tumor surgery

As the identification of patients with small acoustic neuromas and salvageable hearing increases, intraoperative auditory nerve monitoring has been used increasingly in an attempt to improve the hearing preservation rate. Far-field recordings obtained by brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP), at times enhanced by electrocochleography, have become a standard method of intraoperative auditory nerve assessment. To evaluate the usefulness of this monitoring technique, the hearing preservation results of a series of unmonitored acoustic tumor removals were compared to a series of patients monitored via the standard brainstem auditory evoked potentials. With comparable average tumor sizes, 4 of 7 unmonitored patients had hearing preserved at preoperative levels compared to 4 of 9 monitored patients. Neither preoperative BAEP assessments nor absolute tumor size were predictive of hearing preservation. This report brings into question the effectiveness of far-field intraoperative BAEP monitoring during acoustic tumor resection and suggests that direct auditory nerve monitoring may be more appropriate.     

Hearing preservation using combined monitoring of extra-tympanic electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses during acoustic neuroma surgery

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an intraoperative monitoring hearing preservation strategy that includes simultaneous recordings of an auditory brainstem response (ABR) and non-invasive electrocochleography (ECochG). The combined ABR and tympanic membrane (TM) ECochG testing was performed in 74 patients undergoing acoustic neuroma (AN) surgery. In addition, EMG recordings were conducted to monitor the facial nerve function. Hearing was preserved in 19 of the 30 patients with residual hearing prior to surgery (63%), and facial nerve function was maintained in 89% of the patients. In most cases, the presence of both auditory brainstem and TM-ECochG responses at the end of surgery was associated with preservation of postoperative functional hearing; however, eight patients had a TM-ECochG response with a complete loss of the ABR, pointing to deafferentation of the auditory nerve. Tumour size and preoperative hearing thresholds significantly affected the postoperative hearing. The TM-ECochG response yielded large reproducible responses, which, in some patients, was the only way to monitor the auditory function. This auditory monitoring approach offers a valuable auditory tool that helps to improve the hearing preservation during AN surgery.     

Hearing preservation using combined monitoring of extra-tympanic electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses during acoustic neuroma surgery

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an intraoperative monitoring hearing preservation strategy that includes simultaneous recordings of an auditory brainstem response (ABR) and non-invasive electrocochleography (ECochG). The combined ABR and tympanic membrane (TM) ECochG testing was performed in 74 patients undergoing acoustic neuroma (AN) surgery. In addition, EMG recordings were conducted to monitor the facial nerve function. Hearing was preserved in 19 of the 30 patients with residual hearing prior to surgery (63%), and facial nerve function was maintained in 89% of the patients. In most cases, the presence of both auditory brainstem and TM-ECochG responses at the end of surgery was associated with preservation of postoperative functional hearing; however, eight patients had a TM-ECochG response with a complete loss of the ABR, pointing to deafferentation of the auditory nerve. Tumour size and preoperative hearing thresholds significantly affected the postoperative hearing. The TM-ECochG response yielded large reproducible responses, which, in some patients, was the only way to monitor the auditory function. This auditory monitoring approach offers a valuable auditory tool that helps to improve the hearing preservation during AN surgery.     

Intraoperative monitoring of early auditory evoked potentials in hearing acoustic neuroma patients complemented by cochlear nerve action potentials]

Hearing preservation was attempted in eight cases of acoustic neurinomas with good preoperative hearing. This was successful in 3 cases. Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP0 were monitored in all cases, and compound nerve action potentials (CNAP) were recorded from the cochlear nerve in the last 3 cases. The BAEP was extremely sensitive to intraoperative manipulation. Intraoperative loss of wave V in BAEP was observed not only in all 5 cases with postoperative hearing loss, but also in 2 out of 3 cases with successful hearing preservation. CNAP correlated better with the hearing outcome than BAEP. In the cases where hearing was preserved, intact CNAP responses were demonstrated at the end of the operation. Conversely, deterioration of CNAP was seen in a case of postoperative hearing loss. CNAP was 10-15 times larger in amplitude than BAEP, so that the new responses were obtainable in shorter intervals. This capability of frequent examination seemed to increase the possibility of avoiding irreversible damage to the hearing by changing surgical tactics. The addition of CNAP monitoring is a good supplement to conventional BAEP monitoring in acoustic neurinoma surgery.     

Prognostic factors for hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prognostic indicators for hearing preservation could be identified in patients with vestibular schwannoma undergoing middle fossa craniotomy resection. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case review. SETTING: Private practice tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: 333 patients with serviceable hearing and vestibular schwannoma resected by middle fossa craniotomy from 1992 to 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Potential prognostic indicators, including tumor size and nerve of origin, preoperative pure-tone average, speech discrimination, distortion product otoacoustic emission testing, age, auditory brainstem response (ABR), and electronystagmography. RESULTS: Postoperative hearing near preoperative levels was attained in 167 patients (50%), with an American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Class A hearing result in 33% and a Class B result in 26%. Comparison of potential prognostic indicators between groups with hearing preserved and the group with no measurable hearing revealed significant differences in preoperative hearing, ABR, and tumor origin data. Better preoperative hearing, shorter intraaural wave V latency, shorter absolute wave V latency, and superior vestibular nerve origin were associated with higher rates of hearing preservation. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative hearing status, ABR, and intraoperative tumor origin data were shown to be of value as prognostic indicators.     

Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery.

This article reviews the Montreal experience of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. The medical records since 1995 of 36 patients who underwent acoustic neuroma extirpation with the intent to preserve hearing were examined. Intraoperative monitoring was conducted using auditory brainstem response measurement with electrocochleography via a transtympanic electrode. The role of intraoperative monitoring in guiding surgical technique and its correlation with postoperative hearing outcome are discussed. A review of the literature regarding hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery is included.     

Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions pattern as a prognostic indicator for hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pre-operative transient otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) patterns are predictive of successful hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral medical center. PATIENTS: A convenience sample was identified in whom pre-operative TEOAE data were available in patients undergoing acoustic neuroma surgery from 1993-2004. Ninety-three patients were identified who met this inclusion criterion. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects underwent attempted hearing preservation surgery via middle cranial fossa or retrosigmoid approaches. Routine audiometry, ABR, and TEOAE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pre- and post-operative pure tone and speech results were categorized into hearing classes A, B, C, and D as described in the American Academy of Otolaryngology guidelines (1995). Hearing preservation was defined by maintenance of the pre-operative hearing class or downgrade to within one hearing class post-op. Pre-operative TEOAE results were divided into five frequency bands and described as positive in each band if there was a response above the noise floor with >50% reproducibility. RESULTS: Hearing was preserved in 51 patients (55%). Of these, 11 (22%) had positive TEOAE response in all five frequency bands measured (1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 kHz), whereas 40 (78%) had TEOAE responses ranging from 0 to 4 frequency bands. 42 patients failed to preserve their hearing. Of these, only three (7%) had positive TEOAE in all five frequency bands, and 39 (93%) had TEOAE responses ranging from 0 to 4 frequency bands (p<0.05). Other variables of prognostic significance to hearing preservation in our series included smaller tumor size, tumor location within the IAC, better pre-operative hearing, and shorter latencies on ABR. Logistic regression was then used to compare the prognostic value of TEOAE against these variables. In our series, ABR latencies and 5 frequency band response on TEOAE showed the highest significant correlation to hearing preservation (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: A robust pre-operative TEOAE frequency band pattern may be used as a favorable prognostic indicator for potential hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. The prognostic value may be enhanced when combined with other prognostic factors such as tumor size, tumor location, pre-operative ABR and audiometric results.     

Hearing Preservation in Acoustic Neuroma Surgery

Introduction An acoustic neuroma (AN) is a neurinoma arisingfrom the vestibular branch of the VIIIth cranial nerve,thereby also termed “vestibular schawnnomas (VS)”.The histo-pathologically benign nature of this tumorgives the possibility for neuro-otologists to preserve thecochlear nerve and hearing in tumor resection sur-geries. Advances in imaging technology have greatlyimproved early diagnosis of ANs with very small sizesand made tumor removal without significantly insultinghearing. …     

Evaluation of three intraoperative auditory monitoring techniques in acoustic neuroma surgery

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of three intraoperative auditory monitoring techniques: auditory brainstem response (ABR), electrocochleography (ECoG), and direct eight nerve monitoring (DENM). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of the intraoperative recordings of ABR, ECoG, and DENM was performed. SETTING: A private, neurotologic practice. PATIENTS: Sixty-six patients with usable preoperative hearing underwent intraoperative auditory monitoring with ABR, ECoG, or DENM. INTERVENTIONS: Intraoperative auditory monitoring. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative pure-tone hearing threshold and word recognition scores. RESULTS: Of the 66 patients, 16 (24%) had postoperative serviceable hearing. Five (18%) of the 28 with ABR monitoring, 3 (17%) of the 18 with ECoG monitoring, and 8 (40%) of the 20 with DENM monitoring had serviceable hearing after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that DENM may be more effective than ABR or ECoG, although the differences in hearing preservation rates are not statistically significant.     

Hearing preservation following suboccipital removal of acoustic neuromas

Advances in the diagnosis and intraoperative management of acoustic neuromas have greatly reduced the incidence of neurologic deficits following their removal. Ninety-three patients underwent acoustic tumor removal during a 41/2-year period, and hearing preservation was attempted in 20 cases. Hearing was preserved in 65% of the entire series, and excellent results were obtained in tumors less than 1.5 cm. No patient with a tumor greater than 1.5 cm had serviceable hearing preserved when total tumor removal was performed. Two patients, one with neurofibromatosis and one with an acoustic neuroma in an only-hearing ear, had planned partial tumor removal with preservation of hearing. Preoperative auditory brainstem response results were not predictive of postoperative hearing preservation. Intraoperative auditory brainstem response monitoring demonstrated that loss of wave V consistently correlated with loss of hearing postoperatively, whereas persistence of wave V (with a latency prolongation not exceeding 3.00 ms) was predictive of successful hearing preservation regardless of latency increases.     

Audiometric findings in patients with acoustic neuroma

OBJECTIVE: Hearing loss remains the most common symptom associated with acoustic neuroma. This study documents the audiometric findings from 721 acoustic neuroma procedures. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. The preoperative audiometric data were compiled and were analyzed by patient age, gender, tumor size, time of surgery, and neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF 2). Postoperative audiometric data were arranged and compiled in the same way. The hearing classification proposed by the AAO-HNS was applied to all preoperative and postoperative cases. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Surgically confirmed acoustic neuroma patients who had not previously received surgical or radiosurgical therapy. Patients underwent surgery by the retrosigmoid approach. INTERVENTION: Surgical removal of an acoustic neuroma. MAIN OUTCOME RESULT: Provision of pure tone and speech data from a group of acoustic neuroma patients, including application of the recently introduced and accepted AAO-HNS hearing classification system. RESULTS: Preoperative audiometric data were obtained from 694 of 721 patients (96%), of whom 619 had measurable hearing. Postoperative audiometry was performed on 606 patients; 152 had usable data. The combined preoperative audiometric data revealed a high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Word recognition was servicable. The postoperative pure tones and word recognition scores were worse than preoperative scores. Age, gender, tumor size, and time of surgery had some impact on the preoperative hearing and the postoperative result; NF 2 did not. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms that hearing alteration is almost universal in acoustic neuroma patients. Hearing preservation is possible in a significant number of cases; however, the postoperative auditory function tends to be worse.     

Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery and postoperative audiological findings

One hundred fifty-three cases of acoustic neuroma were treated surgically by the middle cranial fossa approach or extended middle cranial fossa approach. Attempts to preserve hearing were made in 30 cases with tumours extending 2.0 cm or less into the posterior fossa; successful hearing preservation was achieved in 12 cases. Among the 15 patients with preoperative hearing levels (HL) of 50 dB or lower and speech discrimination scores (SDS) of 50% or higher, hearing was preserved in 9 (60%) patients. A similar rate of hearing preservation was achieved among the patients with normal or near-normal hearing. Compared with those patients in whom hearing could not be preserved, those with hearing preservation had better HL, higher SDS, and less abnormal ABR findings preoperatively. Postoperatively, the HL and SDS deteriorated slightly. In addition, there was a marked prolongation of the IT5, and the incidence of absence of the stapedius reflex increased. Compared with the preoperative HL, the postoperative HL was unchanged in 5 cases; deteriorated temporarily and then improved in 5 cases; and deteriorated, though with hearing preserved, in 2 cases. Intraoperative monitoring was conducted by recording the ABR and VIII nerve compound action potentials and by electrocochleography. However, postoperative hearing could not always be predicted from the findings obtained at the end of the operation.     

Intraoperative BAER monitoring and hearing preservation in the treatment of acoustic neuromas

We treated 20 cases of acoustic neuromas in the last 2 1/2 years using the suboccipital approach with intraoperative monitoring of eighth nerve function in an attempt to preserve hearing. Total tumor removal was accomplished in 18 cases. Three tumors were small (less than 2 cm in size); 3 tumors were moderate sized (2 to 3 cm) and 14 tumors were large (greater than 3 cm). In 15 cases, all BAER components were lost during surgery. These patients had no postoperative hearing. In five patients there was intraoperative preservation of some or all BAER components. These included the three patients with small tumors and two other patients with moderate sized tumors. One patient with a moderate size tumor had preservation of wave 1 only, and had no postoperative speech discrimination. One patient with a small tumor retained all 5 BAER components, but had no postoperative hearing. Three patients in our series retained functional hearing after surgery, including 3 of 5 patients with tumors 2 cm or smaller. Intraoperative BAER monitoring appears to be useful in predicting postoperative hearing. Tumor size seems to be the primary factor in preservation of hearing following acoustic neuroma surgery.     

Is hearing preservation feasible with the retrosigmoid approach?

The main advantages of the retrosigmoid approach are fast and good visualization of the brainstem structures and the possibility to remove tumors of all sizes. Hearing preservation, although possible, is not always achieved. The aim of this study is to present our experience with the retrosigmoid approach for acoustic neuroma resection, emphasizing our hearing results. The notes of 56 cases of acoustic neuroma removed through a the retrosigmoid approach were reviewed. Tumor size ranged from 8 to 50 mm (mean 24 mm). Considering patients with preoperative serviceable hearing, postoperative serviceable and measurable hearing was achieved in 13.3% and 26.7% of cases respectively. No tumor recurrence occurred in our series. The retrosigmoid approach is a reliable surgical procedure for most vestibular schwannoma. However, hearing preservation results may be unsatisfactory and show wide differences depending on selection criteria and the hearing terminology used. Concerns about hearing preservation should not be the deciding factor for using this approach.     

Intraoperative monitoring of facial and cochlear nerves during acoustic neuroma surgery.

The likelihood of successful preservation of facial and cochlear nerve function during acoustic neuroma surgery has been improved by the advent of intraoperative monitoring techniques. The facial nerve is monitored by recording EMG from facial muscles, with no muscle relaxants used; mechanical irritation of the nerve during surgery causes increased EMG activity, which can be detected in real time using a loudspeaker. Brief episodes of activity associated with specific surgical maneuvers aid the surgeon in avoiding damage to the nerve, whereas prolonged tonic EMG activity may reflect significant neural injury. Electrical stimulation with a hand-held probe elicits evoked EMG responses, which can be used to locate and map the nerve in relation to the tumor. The threshold for eliciting evoked EMG responses provides a rough indicator of the functional status of the nerve. Different nerves in the posterior fossa (trigeminal, facial, spinal accessory) can be identified in multichannel recordings by the spatial distribution and latency of responses to electrical stimulation. The ability to elicit EMG responses from low amplitude stimulation of the facial nerve at the brain stem after tumor removal is a reasonable predictor of postoperative facial function. Cochlear nerve function is assessed by recording the ABR from ear canal and scalp electrodes or the CNAP with an electrode placed directly on the nerve at the brain stem root entry zone. The ABR is a well-known, noninvasive technique that can be adapted to intraoperative use relatively easily but is of limited utility owing to the delay inherent in signal averaging. Direct CNAP recordings require placement of an intracranial electrode in such a way as to contact the cochlear nerve without interfering with surgical access but have the distinct advantage of rapid feedback on changes in cochlear nerve status.     

Is the Presence of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Ears With Acoustic Neuroma Significant

One hundred sixty-eight patients admitted for acoustic neuroma removal were involved in this study. In all cases, the size of the tumor and the presence or absence of tinnitus and vertigo or dizziness were evaluated. Investigated functional procedures included bilateral measures of pure-tone audiometry (PTA), auditory brainstem response (ABR), electronystagmography (ENG), and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs). Thirty-five patients (21%) had normal preoperative TEOAEs in the affected ear, whereas 133 patients (79%) failed to show reproducible responses. The aims of this study were 1. to evaluate what distinguishes patients with preoperative TEOAEs in the pathological ear (group A) from those who had no TEOAE (group B); and 2. to determine in cases of attempted hearing preservation whether preoperative TEOAE presence in the neuroma ear (group C) was predictive of postoperative hearing preservation compared with the group of patients without TEOAEs (group D). The presence of vertigo or dizziness was significantly less frequent, the age was lower, and preoperative mean PTA loss in both ears was lower in group A compared with group B. Frequency of the other studied parameters and ABR threshold were similar in both groups. When hearing preservation was attempted, the mean preoperative PTA loss of group C patients was lower in both ears compared with group D. However, postoperative mean PTA loss did not significantly differ in the two groups. In group C, the percentage of hearing preservation (66.6%) was significantly higher than the percentage of deafness (33.4%), whereas in group D the percentage of postoperative preserved audition and deafness did not significantly differ (respectively 44.4% and 55.6%). The findings suggest that 1. TEOAEs in ears with acoustic neuromas are found in younger patients with a lower preoperative mean PTA loss and are accompanied by fewer functional complaints, perhaps because preserved TEOAEs indicate a better preservation of inner ear vasculature; and, 2. along with radiological and electrophysiological investigations, TEOAE presence in the pathological ear could provide an additional criterion or predictive factor for the successful outcome of attempted hearing-conservation surgery in ears with acoustic neuromas.