Canadian Helicobacter pylori Consensus Conference update: infections in adults. Canadian Helicobacter Study Group.

The first Canadian Helicobacter pylori Consensus Conference took place in April 1997. The initial recommendations of the conference were published in early 1998. An update meeting was held in June 1998, and the present paper updates and complements the earlier recommendations. Key changes included the following: the recommendation for testing and treating H pylori infection in patients with known peptic ulcer disease was extended to testing and treating patients with ulcer-like dyspepsia; it was decided that the urea breath test (not serology) should be used for routine diagnosis of H pylori infection unless endoscopy is indicated for another reason; and recommended therapies were a twice daily, seven-day regimen of a proton pump inhibitor (omeprazole 20 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg) or ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg, plus clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1000 mg, or plus clarithromycin 500 or 250 mg and metronidazole 500 mg. The need was reiterated to have funding for readily accessible, accurate testing for H pylori infection with the urea breath test. It was strongly recommended that regional centres be established to monitor the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant H pylori infections. The initial consensus document referred to pediatric issues that were not addressed in this update but were the subject of a subsequent Canadian Helicobacter Study Group meeting, and will be published later in 1999.     

Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: update

Background and Aims: Since the publication of the Asia‐Pacific GERD consensus in 2004, more data concerning the epidemiology and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have emerged. An evidence based review and update was needed. Methods: A multidisciplinary group developed consensus statements using the Delphi approach. Relevant data were presented, and the quality of evidence, strength of recommendation, and level of consensus were graded. Results: GERD is increasing in frequency in Asia. Risk factors include older age, male sex, race, family history, higher socioeconomic status, increased body mass index, and smoking. Symptomatic response to a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test is diagnostic in patients with typical symptoms if alarm symptoms are absent. A negative pH study off therapy excludes GERD if a PPI test fails. The role for narrow band imaging, capsule endoscopy, and wireless pH monitoring has not yet been undefined. Diagnostic strategies in Asia must consider coexistent gastric cancer and peptic ulcer. Weight loss and elevation of head of bed improve reflux symptoms. PPIs are the most effective medical treatment. On‐demand therapy is appropriate for nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) patients. Patients with chronic cough, laryngitis, and typical GERD symptoms should be offered twice daily PPI therapy after excluding non‐GERD etiologies. Fundoplication could be offered to GERD patients when an experienced surgeon is available. Endoscopic treatment of GERD should not be offered outside clinical trials. Conclusions: Further studies are needed to clarify the role of newer diagnostic modalities and endoscopic therapy. Diagnostic strategies for GERD in Asia must consider coexistent gastric cancer and peptic ulcer. PPIs remain the cornerstone of therapy.     

Step-down management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: As the economic burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is largely weighted to maintenance as opposed to initial therapy, switching from more potent to less expensive medication once symptoms are alleviated (step-down therapy) may prove to be most cost-effective. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the feasibility of step-down therapy in a cohort of patients with symptoms of uncomplicated GERD. METHODS: Patients whose GERD symptoms were alleviated by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were recruited from outpatient general medicine clinics. After baseline demographic and quality of life information were obtained, PPIs were withdrawn from subjects in a stepwise fashion. Primary outcome was recurrence of symptoms during follow-up that required reinstitution of PPIs. Secondary outcomes included changes in quality of life and overall cost of management. Predictors of nonresponse to step-down were assessed. RESULTS: Seventy-one of 73 enrolled subjects completed the study. Forty-one of 71 (58%) were asymptomatic off PPI therapy after 1 year of follow-up. Twenty-four of 71 (34%) required histamine 2-receptor antagonists, 5/71 (7%) prokinetic agents, 1/71 (1%) both, and 11/71 (15%) remained asymptomatic without medication. Quality of life did not significantly change, whereas management costs decreased by 37%. Multivariable analysis revealed younger age and a dominant symptom of heartburn to predict PPI requirement. CONCLUSIONS: Step-down therapy is successful in the majority of patients and can decrease costs without adversely affecting quality of life.     

Pharmacologic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

The burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) results from its widespread prevalence and the unfavorable impact of its symptoms on well-being and quality of life. Whereas abnormalities of the antireflux barrier (lower esophageal sphincter) are important in the pathophysiology of GERD, pharmacologic therapy for GERD is based on suppression of acid, which is responsible for the majority of the symptoms and for epithelial damage. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the agents of choice for achieving the goals of medical therapy in GERD, which include symptom relief, improvement in quality of life, and healing and prevention of mucosal injury. As a class, these drugs are extremely safe. The newest PPI, esomeprazole, brings a statistically significant increase in healing of mucosal injury and symptom relief in patients with erosive esophagitis, compared with omeprazole and lansoprazole. This article reviews the role of medical therapy in the short-and long-term management of symptomatic patients with or without erosive esophagitis, including extraesophageal presentations, GERD during pregnancy, and Barrett’s esophagus. Management of refractory patients is addressed.     

Pharmacologic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Opinion statement The burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) results from its widespread prevalence and the unfavorable impact of its symptoms on well-being and quality of life. Whereas abnormalities of the antireflux barrier (lower esophageal sphincter) are important in the pathophysiology of GERD, pharmacologic therapy for GERD is based on suppression of acid, which is responsible for the majority of the symptoms and for epithelial damage. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the agents of choice for achieving the goals of medical therapy in GERD, which include symptom relief, improvement in quality of life, and healing and prevention of mucosal injury. As a class, these drugs are extremely safe. The newest PPI, esomeprazole, brings a statistically significant increase in healing of mucosal injury and symptom relief in patients with erosive esophagitis, compared with omeprazole and lansoprazole. This article reviews the role of medical therapy in the short- and long-term management of symptomatic patients with or without erosive esophagitis, including extraesophageal presentations, GERD during pregnancy, and Barrett’s esophagus. Management of refractory patients is addressed.     

Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference: peripheral arterial disease - executive summary

This Consensus Conference has been supported by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society. The process is dynamic, with intentional structure that requires peer review and feedback from cardiovascular specialists across Canada. The writing and review panel encompassed a broad range of specialists caring for the patient with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). PAD is an often asymptomatic, underdiagnosed, under-recognized and undertreated condition. It is associated with significant morbidity and cardiac mortality. Until recently, little attention has focused on the evaluation and treatment of the disease process itself. The goal of the present paper is to ensure better treatment, to reduce both morbidity and mortality in the patient with vascular disease and, importantly, to serve as a guide to the busy clinician. Although the focus is PAD, there are chapters on thoracic and abdominal aortic disease, renal arterial disease and the evidence supporting management. Screening and diagnostic techniques including history and physical examination as well as noninvasive imaging techniques are reviewed. Medical management for patients with vascular disease including prevention and risk reduction is graded based on evidence, including both pharmacological and nonpharmacological management strategies, followed by an introduction to newer percutaneous techniques. Finally, surgical treatment for claudication including new concepts on the perioperative risk assessment for patients undergoing major vascular surgery is discussed.     

Key points in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a relatively common condition with a prevalence ranging from 10% to 20% in Western countries and 5% to 10% in Asian populations [1]. In a recent evidence-based consensus [2], GERD was defined as a condition that develops when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms or complications. This global definition emphasizes the syndromic nature of the disease and subdivides the patients in different groups depending on the presence of mucosal complications (ie, esophagitis, metaplasia, stenosis) and on the prevalent clinical manifestations (ie, typical reflux symptoms or extraesophageal/supraesophageal syndromes). General practitioners, gastroenterologists, and specialists from different branches of medicine generally share the management of GERD patients, and basically they need to address the following four issues.     

Endoscopic management of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease

Objective: Despite the therapeutic and surgical interventions for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), yet the high cost and the post-operative complications had led to a significant socioeconomic burden. The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) in the management of refractory GERD.

Methods: A total of 150 patients with refractory GERD were assigned to an EBL group (banding was done at four quadrants just at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) (n?=?75) or to a control group (optimized dose of PPI, n?=?75). Follow-up for both groups by upper GI endoscopy to evaluate the site of the Z line from the incisors, the width of the GEJ and the coaptation of GEJ around the endoscope on retroflection. PH monitoring was performed every 3 months with GERD- QoL assessment monthly for 1 year.

Results: In EBL group; 58 patients (77.3%) needed 1 session, 17 patients (22.7%) needed 2 sessions. 4 rubber bands were utilized in 44 patients (58.7%), 3 rubber bands in 31 patients (41.3%). Follow-up for 1 year revealed a highly significant improvement of the GERD- QoL score, the site of Z line with significant reduction of reflux episodes and symptom index when compared to the medical treatment group. In EBL group; there were no major adverse events including bleeding, post band ulcers, stenosis at one year follow up.

Conclusion: The current study provides a novel endoscopic intervention to treat refractory GERD, which is safe, cost-effective, with no major adverse effects at one year follow up.     

The pharmacological management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders, and the pharmacological management of GERD is a topic of intense interest given the sizeable yearly expenditure for antireflux therapies. GERD is primarily a motor disorder of the esophagus, yet pharmacological approaches directed at altering esophageal motility have been only partially effective. Antisecretory therapy is the mainstay of treatment for GERD. Both H2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective in the treatment of GERD, but PPI therapy is clearly superior in the treatment of severe disease and in the healing of erosive esophagitis. A treatment schema for GERD based on presenting symptoms is outlined, promoting a stepwise approach to the appropriate use of antisecretory therapy.