Constitutive activity of histamine h(3) receptors stably expressed in SK-N-MC cells: display of agonism and inverse agonism by H(3) antagonists.

Agonist-independent activity of G-protein-coupled receptor, also referred to as constitutive activity, is a well-documented phenomenon and has been reported recently for both the histamine H(1) and H(2) receptors. Using SK-N-MC cell lines stably expressing the human and rat H(3) receptors at physiological receptor densities (500-600 fmol/mg of protein), we show that both the rat and human H(3) receptors show a high degree of constitutive activity. The forskolin-mediated cAMP production in SK-N-MC cells is inhibited strongly upon expression of the G(i)-coupled H(3) receptor. The cAMP production can be further inhibited upon agonist stimulation of the H(3) receptor and can be enhanced by a variety of H(3) antagonists acting as inverse agonists at the H(3) receptor. Thioperamide, clobenpropit, and iodophenpropit raise the cAMP levels in SK-N-MC cells with potencies that match their receptor binding affinities. Surprisingly, impentamine and burimamide act as effective H(3) agonists. Modification of the amine group of impentamine dramatically affected the pharmacological activity of the ligand. Receptor affinity was reduced slightly for most impentamine analogs, but the functional activity of the ligands varied from agonist to neutral antagonist and inverse agonist, indicating that subtle changes in the chemical structures of impentamine analogs have major impact on the (de)activation steps of the H(3) receptor. In conclusion, upon stable expression of the rat and human H(3) receptor in SK-N-MC cells constitutive receptor activity is detected. In this experimental system, H(3) receptors ligands, previously identified as H(3) antagonists, cover the whole spectrum of pharmacological activities, ranging from full inverse agonists to agonists.     

Role of G protein-mediated signal transduction in molecular pharmacodynamics

Hormones, neurotransmitter and autacoid receptors, localized on the plasma membrane, do not interact directly with their respective downstream effector (i.e., an ion channel and/or an enzyme that synthesizes a second messenger), but control their target systems via activation of an intermediary guanine nucleotide binding protein on G protein, which serves as signal transducer. Traffic of these pathways is regulated via a GTP (on)-GDP (off) switch, which is triggered by the receptor. The combination of classical biochemistry and recombinant DNA technology has resulted in the discovery of many members of the G protein family. Receptor desensitization is a main criterion of G protein-coupled receptors with important pharmacological implications. Multiple mechanisms are responsible for the loss of sensitivity that follows against exposure. The process is initiated by uncoupling the receptor from its G protein, which is due to receptor phosphorylation by specific kinases. In the case of the beta-adrenergic receptor, two particular kinases - beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (beta ARK) and protein kinase A--are involved. Further steps of desensitization are receptor sequestration or internalization, an event as rapid and transient as receptor uncoupling, and receptor downregulation, which requires more prolonged agonist exposure. Finally, antagonists are able to induce a receptor-G protein interaction in a reverse manner to agonists. Whereas agonists stimulate both, the GDP dissociation from the G protein and the association of GTP, antagonists markedly decrease GTP association. Moreover, in the turkey erythrocyte adenylyl cyclase system antagonists decrease the GTP-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity almost at basal levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Similar apparent constitutive activity of human histamine H(2)-receptor fused to long and short splice variants of G(salpha).

Fusion proteins allow for the analysis of receptor/G protein coupling under defined conditions. The beta(2)-adrenoceptor (beta(2)AR) fused to the long splice variant of G(salpha) (G(salphaL)) exhibits a higher apparent constitutive activity than the beta(2)-adrenoceptor fused to the short splice variant of G(salpha) (G(salphaS)). Experimentally, this results in higher efficacy and potency of partial agonists and in higher efficacy of inverse agonists at the beta(2)AR fused to G(salphaL) relative to the beta(2)AR fused to G(salphaS), indicating that the agonist-free beta(2)AR and the beta(2)AR occupied by partial agonists promote GDP dissociation from G(salphaL) more efficiently than from G(salphaS). In fact, the GDP affinity of G(salphaS) fused to the beta(2)AR is higher than the GDP affinity of G(salphaL) fused to the beta(2)AR. We asked the question whether the histamine H(2)-receptor (H(2)R) exhibits similar coupling to G(salpha) splice variants as the beta(2)AR. To address this question, we studied H(2)R-G(salpha) fusion proteins expressed in Sf9 cells. In contrast to beta(2)AR-G(salpha) fusion proteins, the potencies and efficacies of partial agonists and the efficacies of inverse agonists were similar at the H(2)R fused to G(salphaL) and G(salphaS) as assessed by guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding and/or steady-state GTPase activity. However, the time course analysis of guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding indicated that G(salphaS) fused to the H(2)R possesses a higher GDP-affinity than G(salphaL) fused to the H(2)R. Our data show that the H(2)R fused to G(salphaL) and G(salphaS) possesses similar constitutive activity and is insensitive to differences in GDP affinity of G(salpha) splice variants. Thus, GDP affinity of G proteins does not generally determine constitutive activity of receptors.     

Inverse agonist activity of selected ligands of the cysteinyl-leukotriene receptor 1

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) are associated with several inflammatory processes, including asthma. Due to this association, considerable effort has been invested in the development of antagonists to the CysLT receptors (CysLT(1)R). Many of these molecules have been shown to specifically interact with CysLT(1)R, but little is known about their impact on the conformation of the receptor and its activity. We were especially interested in possible inverse agonist activity of the antagonists. Using a constitutively active mutant (N106A) of the human CysLT(1)R and the wild-type (WT) receptor coexpressed with the G(alphaq) subunit of the trimeric G protein, we were able to address this issue with ligands commonly used in therapy. We demonstrated that some of these molecules are inverse agonists, whereas others act as partial agonists. In cells expressing the CysLT(1)R mutant N106A exposed to Montelukast, Zafirlukast, or 3-[[3-[2-(7-chloroquinolin-2-yl)vinyl]phenyl]-(2-dimethylcarbamoylethylsulfanyl)methylsulfanyl] propionic acid (MK571), the basal inositol phosphate production was reduced by 53 +/- 6, 44 +/- 3, and 54 +/- 4%, respectively. On the other hand, 6(R)-(4-carboxyphenylthio)-5(S)-hydroxy-7(E),9(E),11(Z),14(Z)-eicosatetraenoic acid (BayU9773) and 1-[2-hydroxy-3-propyl-4-[4-(1H-tetrazole-5-YL)-butoxy]-phenyl ethanone] (LY171883) acted as partial agonists and alpha-pentyl-3-[2-quinolinylmethoxy] benzyl alcohol (REV 5901) as a neutral antagonist. However, in cells expressing CysLT(1)R and G(alphaq), all antagonists used had inverse agonist activity. The decrease in basal inositol phosphate production by ligands with inverse agonist activity could be inhibited by a more neutral antagonist, confirming the specificity of the reaction. We demonstrate here that Montelukast, MK571, and Zafirlukast can act as inverse agonists on the human CysLT(1) receptor.     

G protein-coupled receptors: a count of 1001 conformations

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were initially regarded to adopt an inactive and an active conformation and to activate a single type of G protein. Studies with recombinant cell systems have led to a more complex picture. First, GPCRs can activate distinct G protein species. Second, GPCR multistate models have been invoked to explain their complex behaviour in the presence of agonists, antagonists and other binding partners. The occurrence of intermediate receptor conformational states during GPCR activation and antagonist binding is suggested by fluorescence measurements and studies with constitutively active receptor mutants and insurmountable antagonists. Different agonists may trigger distinct effector pathways through a single receptor by dictating its preference for certain G proteins (i.e. 'agonist trafficking'). Structural modification and exogenous and endogenous (e.g. other cellular proteins, lipids) allosteric modulators also affect ligand-GPCR interaction and receptor activation. These new developments in GPCR research could lead to the development of more selective therapeutic drugs.     

Inverse agonist activity of selected ligands of platelet-activating factor receptor

The receptor for platelet-activating factor (PAFR) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. According to the allosteric ternary complex model, GPCRs exist in an equilibrium between different conformations. Agonist binding promotes and stabilizes the receptor in an active conformation. On the other hand, ligands that stabilize the inactive conformation are known as inverse agonists. Due to the association of platelet-activating factor (PAF) with diverse physiological and pathological processes, considerable efforts have been invested in the development of antagonists to PAFR. A large number of these molecules has been shown to specifically interact with PAFR but, surprisingly, little is known about their impact on the conformation of the receptor and its activity. By using a constitutively active mutant (L231R) of the human PAFR and by transiently coexpressing the wild-type (WT) receptor with the G(alpha)q subunit of the trimeric G protein, we were able to address this issue with ligands of diverse structures such as phospholipids, benzodiazepines, furans, and others. We demonstrated that some of these molecules are potent inverse agonists. For example, when cells (WT PAFR + G(alpha)q) were exposed to WEB2086, SM10661, or alprazolam, the basal inositol phosphate production was reduced by 53 +/- 6, 44 +/- 3, and 54 +/- 4%, respectively. The decrease in basal inositol phosphate production by WEB2086 was significantly inhibited by a more neutral antagonist BN52021, confirming the specificity of the reaction. We demonstrate here that WEB2086 and other known ligands previously considered as antagonists can act as inverse agonists on the human PAF receptor.     

Mutations of Cys-17 and Ala-271 in the human histamine H2 receptor determine the species selectivity of guanidine-type agonists and increase constitutive activity

In a steady-state GTPase activity assay, N-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl)]guanidines and N(G)-acylated derivatives are more potent and efficacious at fusion proteins of guinea pig (gpH(2)R-G(salphaS)) than human (hH(2)R-G(salphaS)) histamine H(2) receptor, coupled to the short splice variant of G(salpha), G(salphaS). Whereas Ala-271 (hH(2)R) and Asp-271 (gpH(2)R) in transmembrane domain 7 were identified to determine the potency differences of guanidine-type agonists, the molecular basis for the efficacy differences remains to be elucidated. A homology model of the gpH(2)R suggested that an H-bond between Tyr-17 and Asp-271 stabilizes an active receptor conformation of the gpH(2)R. In the present study, we generated a mutant hH(2)R-G(salphaS) with Cys-17--> Tyr-17/Ala-271--> Asp-271 exchanges (hH(2)R-->gpH(2)R) that exhibited an enhanced level of constitutive GTPase activity and adenylyl cyclase activity compared with wild-type hH(2)R-G(salphaS) and gpH(2)R-G(salphaS). Potencies and efficacies of guanidines and N(G)-acylguanidines were increased at this mutant receptor compared with hH(2)R-G(salphaS), but they were still lower than at gpH(2)R-G(salphaS), suggesting that aside from Tyr-17 and Asp-271 additional amino acids contribute to the distinct pharmacological profiles of both species isoforms. Another hH(2)R-G(salphaS) mutant with a Cys-17--> Tyr-17 exchange showed inefficient coupling to G(salphaS) as revealed by reduced agonist-stimulated GTPase and basal adenylyl cyclase activities. Collectively, our present pharmacological study confirms the existence of an H-bond between Tyr-17 and Asp-271 favoring the stabilization of an active receptor conformation. Distinct potencies and efficacies of agonists and inverse agonists further support the concept of ligand-specific conformations in wild-type and mutant H(2)R-G(salphaS) fusion proteins.     

Positive and negative allosteric modulation of metabotropic glutamate receptors: emerging therapeutic potential

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) modulate neuronal activity in the central and peripheral nervous systems, and since their discovery have attracted considerable attention as putative therapeutic targets for a range of neurological and psychiatric disorders. A number of competitive agonists and antagonists acting at the N-terminal glutamate binding site have been identified, the majority of which are conformationally constrained or substituted amino acid analogues. These ligands have greatly facilitated investigation of the physiological and pathological roles of the receptor family. However, their utility and therapeutic potential has been restricted by relatively poor bioavailability and central nervous system (CNS) penetration, as well as limited chemical tractability and, generally, a lack of selectivity for individual mGluRs. Recently, a number of non-competitive mGluR ligands have been identified which bind within the receptor transmembrane heptahelical domain. These include both positive and negative allosteric modulators. Positive allosteric modulators do not exhibit intrinsic agonism but facilitate agonist-mediated receptor activity. Negative allosteric modulators include both non-competitive antagonists and inverse agonists. Allosteric modulation offers the potential for improved selectivity, particularly for individual receptors within the mGluR family, and enhanced chemical tractability relative to competitive agonists/antagonists. In addition, positive allosteric modulation provides a distinct, and perhaps superior, profile to receptor agonism, offering the potential for facilitation of physiologically appropriate receptor activation with reduced liability for receptor desensitisation and/or tolerance. Thus, the emerging field of positive and negative allosteric modulation of the mGluR family offers considerable promise for the development of novel therapeutics.     

Constitutive coupling of a chimeric dopamine D2/alpha 1B receptor to the phospholipase C pathway: inverse agonism to silent antagonism by neuroleptic drugs

Neuroleptic drugs have been suggested to act as inverse agonists at the dopamine D2 receptor, but no link between therapeutic efficacy and ligand's intrinsic activity could be determined. Since the resolving capacity to monitor inverse agonism at dopamine D2 receptors is limited, we speculated that receptor constitutive activation could be enhanced by constructing chimeric D2/alpha 1B receptors. Marked inverse agonist responses with a series of dopamine antagonists were obtained by: 1) exchange of the D 2short receptor's 3ICL by that of the alpha 1B-adrenoceptor, 2) incorporation of an activating mutation (Ala 279 Glu) in the distal portion of its 3ICL, and 3) coexpression with a G alpha11 protein. This chimeric D2/alpha 1B receptor construct displayed a ligand binding profile comparable to that of the wild-type (wt) D 2short receptor and an effector activation profile close to that of the wt alpha 1B-adrenoceptor. Most of the dopamine antagonists attenuated by -54 to -59% basal inositol phosphates (IP) formation, thus clearly acting as inverse agonists. Ziprasidone behaved as a silent antagonist (+5% versus basal IP level) and antagonized both dopamine-mediated (pK B, 7.61) and tropapride-mediated (pK B, 8.52) IP responses. Clozapine, olanzapine, and raclopride displayed partial inverse agonist properties (-31, -67, and -71% versus tropapride, respectively), whereas bromerguride (+63%) and cis-(+)-5-methoxy-1-methyl-2-(di-n-propylamino tetralin) [(+)-UH 232] (+88%) demonstrated positive agonism. In conclusion, analyses with the chimeric D2/alpha 1B Ala 279 Glu 3ICL receptor construct suggest that neuroleptic drugs can be differentiated on the basis of their intrinsic activity, as they can either activate, inhibit, or be silent at this receptor construct.     

Regulator of G protein signaling proteins: novel multifunctional drug targets

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play a major role in signal transduction and are targets of many therapeutic drugs. The regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins form a recently identified protein family, and they strongly modulate the activity of G proteins. Their best known function is to inhibit G protein signaling by accelerating GTP hydrolysis [GTPase activating protein (GAP)] thus turning off G protein signals. RGS proteins also possess non-GAP functions, through both their RGS domains and various non-RGS domains and motifs (e.g., GGL, DEP, DH/PH, PDZ domains and a cysteine string motif). They are a highly diverse protein family, have unique tissue distributions, are strongly regulated by signal transduction events, and will likely play diverse functional roles in living cells. Thus they represent intriguing, novel pharmacological/therapeutic targets. Drugs targeting RGS proteins can be divided into five groups: 1) potentiators of endogenous agonist function, 2) potentiators/desensitization blockers of exogenous GPCR agonists, 3) specificity enhancers of exogenous agonists, 4) antagonists of effector signaling by an RGS protein, and 5) RGS agonists. In addition, a novel subsite distinction within the RGS domain has been proposed with significant functional implications and defined herein as "A-site" and "B-site". Therefore, RGS proteins should provide exciting new opportunities for drug development.     

Constitutive activity and ligand selectivity of human, guinea pig, rat, and canine histamine H2 receptors

Previous studies revealed pharmacological differences between human and guinea pig histamine H(2) receptors (H(2)Rs) with respect to the interaction with guanidine-type agonists. Because H(2)R species variants are structurally very similar, comparative studies are suited to relate different properties of H(2)R species isoforms to few molecular determinants. Therefore, we systematically compared H(2)Rs of human (h), guinea pig (gp), rat (r), and canine (c). Fusion proteins of hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, rH(2)R, and cH(2)R, respectively, and the short splice variant of G(salpha), G(salphaS), were expressed in Sf9 insect cells. In the membrane steady-state GTPase activity assay, cH(2)R-G(salphaS) but neither gpH(2)R-G(salphaS) nor rH(2)R-G(salphaS) showed the hallmarks of increased constitutive activity compared with hH(2)R-G(salphaS), i.e., increased efficacies of partial agonists, increased potencies of agonists with the extent of potency increase being correlated with the corresponding efficacies at hH(2)R-G(salphaS), increased inverse agonist efficacies, and decreased potencies of antagonists. Furthermore, in membranes expressing nonfused H(2)Rs without or together with mammalian G(salphaS) or H(2)R-G(salpha) fusion proteins, the highest basal and GTP-dependent increases in adenylyl cyclase activity were observed for cH(2)R. An example of ligand selectivity is given by metiamide, acting as an inverse agonist at hH(2)R-G(salphaS), gpH(2)R-G(salphaS), and rH(2)R-G(salphaS) in the GTPase assay in contrast to being a weak partial agonist with decreased potency at cH(2)R-G(salphaS). In conclusion, the cH(2)R exhibits increased constitutive activity compared with hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, and rH(2)R, and there is evidence for ligand-specific conformations in H(2)R species isoforms.     

Generation and characterization of highly constitutive active histamine H3 receptors

Constitutive activation of G-protein-coupled receptors is a well recognized phenomenon, and G-protein-coupled receptor antagonists have been found to possess inverse agonist activity. Constitutive activation of histamine H3 receptor is recently documented in in vivo as well as in recombinant receptor systems in vitro. Several H3 antagonists have been shown to act as inverse agonists and such profiles of H3 antagonists have been implicated in their pharmacological functions. Here we report the construction and characterization of a highly constitutive active H3 receptor (MT6), in which the 357 alanine residue was converted to lysine (A357K). We generated a series of mutated H3 receptors and their functions were examined in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. Among them, induced mutation at the amino acid 357 position (A357K) showed a dramatically enhanced response to thioperamide-induced cAMP accumulation compared with the cells expressing wild-type (WT) H3 receptors, suggesting that the mutation rendered receptors to high constitutive activity. We further characterized by ligand binding assays using membrane fractions, and Ki values of imetit (agonist) and proxyfan (partial agonist) against the MT6 receptors were lower compared with those observed in WT H3 receptors. In contrast, H3 antagonists (thioperamide, ciproxifan, and GT2016) with inverse agonism displayed increased Ki values against the MT6 receptors (2.5- to 5.8-fold), demonstrating more a prominent effect of inverse agonists to the constitutive active receptor. Taken together, these data suggested that A357K mutation in the H3 receptor increased the population of active state receptors that preferably binds to agonists than inverse agonists, which could be termed as a constitutively active mutant of H3 receptor.     

G-protein sensitivity of ligand binding to human dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors expressed in Escherichia coli: clues for a constrained D(3) receptor structure

Human dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors were expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) and Escherichia coli cells to compare their ligand binding properties in the presence or absence of G-proteins and to analyze their ability to interact with G(i/o)-proteins. Binding affinities of agonists (dopamine, 7-OH-DPAT, PD128907, lisuride) and antagonists/inverse agonists (haloperidol, risperidone, domperidone, spiperone, raclopride, nemonapride), measured using [(125)I]iodosulpride and [(3)H]7-OH-DPAT, were similar for hD(3) receptors in E. coli and CHO cell membranes. Both agonists and antagonists showed 2- to 25-fold lower binding affinities at hD(2) receptors in E. coli versus CHO cell membranes (measured with [(3)H]spiperone), but the rank order of potencies remained similar. Purported inverse agonists did not display higher affinities for G-protein-free receptors. In CHO membranes, GppNHp decreased high affinity agonist ([(3)H]7-OH-DPAT) binding at hD(2) receptors but not at hD(3) receptors. Also, [(3)H]7-OH-DPAT (nanomolar concentration range) binding was undetectable at hD(2) but clearly measurable at hD(3) receptors in E. coli membranes. Addition of a G(i/o)-protein mix to E. coli membranes increased high affinity [(3)H]7-OH-DPAT binding in a concentration-dependent manner at hD(2) and hD(3) receptors; this effect was reversed by addition of GppNHp. The potency of the G(i/o)-protein mix to reconstitute high affinity binding was similar for hD(2) and hD(3) receptors. Thus, agonist binding to D(3) receptors is only slightly affected by G-protein uncoupling, pointing to a rigid receptor structure. Furthermore, we propose that the generally reported lower signaling capacity of D(3) receptors (versus D(2) receptors) is not due to its lower affinity for G-proteins but attributed to its lower capacity to activate these G-proteins.     

The endocannabinoid noladin ether acts as a full agonist at human CB2 cannabinoid receptors

Noladin ether (NE) is a putative endogenously occurring cannabinoid demonstrating agonist activity at CB1 receptors. Because of reported selective affinity for CB1 receptors, the pharmacological actions of NE at CB2 receptors have not been examined. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to characterize the binding and functional properties of NE at human CB2 receptors stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells as well as in HL-60 cells, which express CB2 receptors endogenously. Surprisingly, in transfected CHO cells, NE exhibits a relatively high nanomolar affinity for CB2 receptors (K(i) = 480 nM), comparable to that observed for the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) (K(i) = 1016 nM). Furthermore, NE activates G proteins and inhibits the intracellular effector adenylyl cyclase with equivalent efficacy relative to the full cannabinoid agonists 2-AG and CP 55,940 (CP) [(-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl) cyclohexanol]. The rank order of potency for G protein activation and effector regulation by the three agonists is similar to their apparent affinity for CB2 receptors; CP > NE > or = 2-AG. Regulation of adenylyl cyclase activity by all agonists is inhibited by pertussis toxin pretreatment or by coincubation with AM630 [6-iodo-2-methyl-1-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl]-1H-indol-3-yl](4-methoxyphenyl)-methanone], a CB2 antagonist. Chronic treatment with NE or CP results in CB2 receptor desensitization and down-regulation. All agonists also inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity in HL-60 cells. Together, these data indicate that NE acts as a full agonist at human CB2 receptors and thus might have important physiological functions at peripheral cannabinoid receptors.     

Different effects of opioid antagonists on mu-, delta-, and kappa-opioid receptors with and without agonist pretreatment

Opioid receptors display basal signaling (constitutive, agonist-independent activity), which seems to be regulated by agonist exposure. Whereas agonist pretreatment desensitizes receptors to subsequent agonist stimulation, basal signaling of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) was shown to increase. Moreover, agonist pretreatment converts the neutral antagonists naloxone and naltrexone into inverse agonists, suppressing basal signaling, whereas analogs with reduced C6-position, e.g., 6beta-naltrexol, remain neutral antagonists at MOR under any condition. This study compares the regulation of basal signaling of MOR, delta-(DOR), and kappa-(KOR) opioid receptors after pretreatment with morphine or receptor-selective agonists, in transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cell membranes. Moreover, naloxone, naltrexone, and related antagonists were compared for binding potency and effect on basal and agonist-stimulated receptor signaling, measuring guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate binding. The results demonstrate basal activity for each opioid receptor, which is modulated by pretreatment with agonists. Even closely related opioid antagonists display distinct patterns of neutral and inverse effects before and after agonist pretreatment, including distinct efficacies between naloxone and naltrexone at agonist-pretreated DOR and KOR. Pretreatment with different agonists has varying effects on inverse and neutral activities of some analogs tested. These results demonstrate that antagonist efficacy is context-dependent, possibly accounting for paradoxical pharmacological effects. Activity profiles at the three opioid receptors under different conditions could lead to antagonists with optimal clinical properties in treatment of addiction and adverse opioid effects.     

Receptor binding and pharmacological activity of opiates in the guinea-pig intestine.

A comparison was made between the affinities of a wide range of opiate agonists, mixed agonist-antagonists and antagonists for opiate receptor binding sites in the guniea-pig intestine longitudinal muscle and myenteric plexus preparation, and their pharmacological potency in influencing the electrically induced contraction of this in vitro functional system. The relative affinities of drugs and the degree of stereospecificity for intestinal binding sites are closely similar to these properties in the brain. Receptor binding correlates extremely well with pharmacological potency, both for agonists and antagonists, indicating that binding involves pharmacologically relevant opiate receptors. Pharmacological activity correlates best with receptor binding assayed in the presence of sodium.     

Inverse agonism and neutral antagonism at wild-type and constitutively active mutant delta opioid receptors

The delta opioid receptor modulates nociceptive and emotional behaviors. This receptor has been shown to exhibit measurable spontaneous activity. Progress in understanding the biological relevance of this activity has been slow, partly due to limited characterization of compounds with intrinsic negative activity. Here, we have used constitutively active mutant (CAM) delta receptors in two different functional assays, guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding and a reporter gene assay, to test potential inverse agonism of 15 delta opioid compounds, originally described as antagonists. These include the classical antagonists naloxone, naltrindole, 7-benzylidene-naltrexone, and naltriben, a new set of naltrindole derivatives, H-Tyr-Tic-Phe-Phe-OH (TIPP) and H-Tyr-TicPsi[CH2N]Cha-Phe-OH [TICP(Psi)], as well as three 2',6'-dimethyltyrosine-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline-3-carboxylate (Dmt-Tic) peptides. A reference agonist, SNC 80 [(+)-4-[(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-Allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide], and inverse agonist, ICI 174864 (N,N-diallyl-Tyr-Aib-Aib-Phe-Leu), were also included. In a screen using wild-type and CAM M262T delta receptors, naltrindole (NTI) and close derivatives were mostly inactive, and TIPP behaved as an agonist, whereas Dmt-Tic-OH and N,N(CH3)2-Dmt-Tic-NH2 showed inverse agonism. The two latter compounds showed negative activity across 27 CAM receptors, suggesting that this activity was independent from the activation mechanism. These two compounds also exhibited nanomolar potencies in dose-response experiments performed on wild-type, M262T, Y308H, and C328R CAM receptors. TICP(Psi) exhibited strong inverse agonism at the Y308H receptor. We conclude that the stable N,N(CH3)2-Dmt-Tic-NH2 compound represents a useful tool to explore the spontaneous activity of delta receptors, and NTI and novel derivatives behave as neutral antagonists.     

gamma-aminobutyric acid(B) receptors: first of the functional metabotropic heterodimers

Activation of the metabotropic gamma-aminobutyric acid(B) (GABA(B)) receptor increases K(+) conductance and decreases Ca(2+) channel activity in neuronal membranes. Studies with a number of new GABA(B) receptor agonists and antagonists reveal that in addition to their muscle relaxant effects, agonists display analgesic activity and reduce the craving for cocaine. With regard to GABA(B) receptor antagonists, preclinical data suggest they improve cognitive performance and possess antidepressant and antiepileptic potential. With a high-affinity GABA(B) antagonist, the structural properties of the receptor were characterized through expression cloning. Moreover, it has been found that expression of a fully functional GABA(B) receptor requires coupling between two separate and distinct gene products: GABA(B) R1 and GABA(B) R2. Besides being the first example of a functional heterodiameric metabotropic receptor, the components and molecular configuration of the GABA(B) receptor suggest novel mechanisms for producing pharmacologically distinct subtypes of G protein-coupled receptors.     

Thermodynamic properties of agonist interactions with the beta adrenergic receptor-coupled adenylate cyclase system. II. Agonist binding to soluble beta adrenergic receptors

The thermodynamic parameters associated with the interactions of agonists and antagonists with digitonin-solubilized beta adrenergic receptors were determined. A rapid method for measuring the binding of [125I]iodopindolol to soluble receptors using glass-fiber filters was developed. The binding of [125I]iodopindolol, an antagonist with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, to soluble receptors was temperature-sensitive as is the binding of the ligand to membrane-bound receptors. The interactions of propranolol and timolol with soluble receptors were independent of temperature. In contrast, the binding of agonists to soluble receptors was sensitive to temperature, although insensitive to GTP. Thermodynamically, the interactions of the antagonists timolol and propranolol with soluble beta adrenergic receptors were entropy-driven, with little contribution from changes in enthalpy. This is consistent with a hydrophobic interaction between the receptor and the antagonist. The binding of [125I]iodopindolol was enthalpy-driven. The binding of full agonists with soluble receptors was described thermodynamically by changes in enthalpy and entropy that were negative relative to the values for propranolol and timolol, suggesting that the guanine nucleotide-binding protein required for stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity and an intact lipid environment are not involved in the thermodynamics of formation of the low-affinity component of agonist binding. These results are consistent with an agonist-induced change in the conformation of the receptor.     

Allosteric Modulation: An Alternate Approach Targeting the Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor

The cannabinoid CB1 receptor is a G protein coupled receptor and plays an important role in many biological processes and physiological functions. A variety of CB1 receptor agonists and antagonists, including endocannabinoids, phytocannabinoids, and synthetic cannabinoids, have been discovered or developed over the past 20 years. In 2005, it was discovered that the CB1 receptor contains allosteric site(s) that can be recognized by small molecules or allosteric modulators. A number of CB1 receptor allosteric modulators, both positive and negative, have since been reported and importantly, they display pharmacological characteristics that are distinct from those of orthosteric agonists and antagonists. Given the psychoactive effects commonly associated with CB1 receptor agonists and antagonists/inverse agonists, allosteric modulation may offer an alternate approach to attain potential therapeutic benefits while avoiding inherent side effects of orthosteric ligands. This review details the complex pharmacological profiles of these allosteric modulators, their structure–activity relationships, and efforts in elucidating binding modes and mechanisms of actions of reported CB1 allosteric modulators. The ultimate development of CB1 receptor allosteric ligands could potentially lead to improved therapies for CB1‐mediated neurological disorders.