Selective NMDA NR2B antagonists induce antinociception without motor dysfunction: correlation with restricted localisation of NR2B subunit in dorsal horn.

The present study investigated the regional distribution of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor containing the NR2B subunit protein in rat lumbar spinal cord and examined whether selective NR2B antagonists would exhibit antinociception with reduced side-effect liability than subtype non-selective NMDA antagonists and anticonvulsants. Immunocytochemical studies showed the NR2B subunit had a restricted distribution, with moderate labelling of fibres in laminas I and II of the dorsal horn suggesting a presynaptic location on primary afferent fibers and possible involvement in pain transmission. In the in vivo studies, the NMDA/glycine antagonists (MK-801, 0.02-1 mg/kg i.p., L-687,414 10-300 mg/kg i.p., and L-701,324 1-10 mg/kg i.p.) and the anticonvulsant, gabapentin (10-500 mg/kg p.o.), induced rotarod deficits at antinociceptive doses. In contrast, the selective NR2B antagonists, (+/-)-CP-101,606 (1-100 mg/kg p.o.) and (+/-)-Ro 25-6981 (3-100 mg/kg i.p.) showed a significant dose window. (+/-)-CP-101,606 caused no motor impairment or stimulation in rats at doses up to 100 mg/kg p.o., which is far in excess of those inhibiting allodynia in neuropathic rats (ID50 4.1 mg/kg, p.o.). (+/-)-Ro 25-6981 also showed a significant separation (ID50 allodynia 3.8 mg/kg, i.p.), however, some disruption of rotarod performance was observed at 100 mg/kg. The anticonvulsant lamotrigine (3-500 mg/kg p.o.) also showed a good dose window. These findings demonstrate that NR2B antagonists may have clinical utility for the treatment of neuropathic and other pain conditions in man with a reduced side-effect profile than existing NMDA antagonists.     

Investigation into the antinociceptive potential of remoxipride administered intrathecally in sheep

Systemic administration of remoxipride, a dopamine (D₂) antagonist, to sheep has previously been shown to generate an antinociceptive action without producing a significant motor impairment. The present study examined whether a spinal locus of action was responsible for this action of remoxipride. Remoxipride (17.7 mg) administered intrathecally via chronically indwelling catheters produced a greatly variable but significant (p<0.05) increase in nociceptive thresholds as judged by a focused mechanical stimulus (blunt pin) applied to the forelimb of four sheep. However, this dose of remoxipride induced a marked forelimb motor impairment as judged by a subjective visual analogue scoring system. Conversely, intrathecal xylazine (100 and 200 μg), an α-adrenergic agonist with antinociceptive properties, did not produce forelimb weakness although the higher dose (200 μg) produced significant sedation. In vitro autoradiography was performed on cervical spinal cord sections taken from sheep. Remoxipride displaced [³H] YM-09151-2, a selective D₂ antagonist, from densely-labelled areas in the superficial layer of the dorsal horn, lamina X and ventral horn. Even though there are possible anatomical substrates within the spinal cord for both an antinociceptive and motor disturbance action of remoxipride, the behavioural data suggest that the spinal cord is unlikely to be the primary site of antinociceptive action for systemically-administered doses of remoxipride. Received: 29 July 1996 / Accepted: 6 December 1996     

Mechanism of antinociceptive effect of nimodipine in experimental diabetic neuropathic pain

This study used streptozotocin-(STZ; 50 mg/kg, i.v.) diabetic rats and monitored the weekly thermal nociceptive thresholds for 8-week diabetes. Nimodipine (10 mg/kg i.p.) treatment initiated after 8 weeks of diabetes antagonized the hyperalgesic response in diabetic rats. However, insulin treatment showed a partial response in these animals. Thermal hyperalgesia showed reduced sensitivity to the antinociceptive effect of morphine (5 mg/kg, i.p.). Furthermore, a reduced sensitivity to the antinociceptive effect of baclofen (GABAB agonist; 4 mg/kg i.p.) was observed. Five days of treatment with MK-801 (N-methyl-D-aspartate [NMDA] receptor antagonist 0.5 mg/kg i.p.) completely reversed 8-week diabetes-induced thermal hyperalgesia. These data suggest that diabetes-induced hyperalgesia may be the consequence of increased excitatory tone within the spinal cord. An increased release of glutamate and activation of the NMDA receptor would maintain the hyperalgesic state. Reduced activity of both opioidergic and GABAB ergic inhibitory systems might accelerate the increased excitation, thus contributing to the ongoing pain in diabetic rats.     

B vitamins induce an antinociceptive effect in the acetic acid and formaldehyde models of nociception in mice

The effect of some B vitamins in chemical and thermal models of nociception in mice was investigated. The association thiamine/pyridoxine/cyanocobalamin (TPC, 20-200 mg/kg, i.p. or per os), thiamine, pyridoxine (50-200 mg/kg, i.p.) or riboflavin (3-100 mg/kg, i.p) induced an antinociceptive effect, not changed by naloxone (10 mg/kg, i.p.), in the acetic acid writhing model. Treatment for 7 days with thiamine/pyridoxine/cyanocobalamin (100 or 200 mg/kg, i.p.), thiamine (50 or 100 mg/kg) or pyridoxine (50 or 100 mg/kg) or acute treatment with riboflavin (6 or 12 mg/kg, i.p) inhibited the nociceptive response induced by formaldehyde. The B vitamins did not inhibit the nociceptive response in the hot-plate model. Both 7-day thiamine/pyridoxine/cyanocobalamin (100 mg/kg, i.p.) or acute riboflavin (25 or 50 mg/kg, i.p.) treatment partially reduced formaldehyde-induced hindpaw oedema. The B vitamins antinociceptive effect may involve inhibition of the synthesis and/or action of inflammatory mediators since it was not observed in the hot-plate model, was not reversed by naloxone, only the second phase of the formaldehyde-induced nociceptive response was inhibited, and formaldehyde-induced hindpaw oedema was reduced.     

Characterization of the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of riboflavin in different experimental models

Riboflavin, similar to other vitamins of the B complex, presents anti-inflammatory activity but its full characterization has not yet been carried out. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of this vitamin in different models of nociception, edema, fever and formation of fibrovascular tissue. Riboflavin (25, 50 or 100 mg/kg, i.p.) did not alter the motor activity of mice in the rota-rod or the open field models. The second phase of the nociceptive response induced by formalin in mice was inhibited by riboflavin (50 or 100 mg/kg). The first phase of this response and the nociceptive behavior in the hot-plate model were inhibited only by the highest dose of this vitamin. Riboflavin (25, 50 or 100 mg/kg, i.p.), administered immediately and 2 h after the injection of carrageenan, induced antiedema and antinociceptive effects. The antinociceptive effect was not inhibited by the pretreatment with cadmium sulfate (1 mg/kg), an inhibitor of flavokinase. Riboflavin (50 or 100 mg/kg, i.p., 0 and 2 h) also inhibited the fever induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in rats. Moreover, the formation of fibrovascular tissue induced by s.c. implant of a cotton pellet was inhibited by riboflavin (50 or 100 mg/kg, i.p., twice a day for one week). Riboflavin (10 or 25 mg/kg, i.p.) also exacerbated the effect of morphine (2, 4 or 8 mg/kg, i.p.) in the mouse formalin test. In conclusion, the study demonstrates the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of riboflavin in different experimental models. These results, associated with the fact that riboflavin is a safe drug, is approved for clinical use and exacerbates the antinociceptive effect of morphine, may warrant clinical trials to assess its potential in the treatment of different painful or inflammatory conditions.     

Effect of chronic and acute administration of fluoxetine and its additive effect with morphine on the behavioural response in the formalin test in rats

Serotonergic systems are involved in the central regulation of nociceptive sensitivity. Fluoxetine, a selective inhibitor of the reuptake of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT), was administered orally (0.16, 0.32, 0.8 mg kg(-1) daily for 7 days), intraperitoneally (0.04, 0.08, 0.16 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 7 days and a single dose of 0.32 mg kg(-1)) and intracerebroventricularly (10 microg/rat) to rats and nociceptive sensitivity was evaluated using the formalin test (50 microL of 2.5% formalin injected subcutaneously). The effect of fluoxetine was also studied in the presence of 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine creatinine sulfate (5,7-DHT) and after co-administration with morphine. Oral (0.8 mg kg(-1)), intraperitoneal (0.16 and 0.32 mg kg(-1)) and intracerebroventricular (10 microg/rat) fluoxetine induced antinociception in the late phase of the formalin test. Furthermore, intrathecal administration of 5-HT (100 microg/rat) induced an analgesic effect. The analgesic effect of fluoxetine (0.16 and 0.32 mg kg(-1), i.p.) and 5-HT (100 microg/rat, i.t.) was abolished by pre-treatment with 5,7-DHT (100 microg/rat, i.t.). In addition, the analgesic effect of 5-HT (100 microg/rat, i.t.) was decreased by pre-treatment with naloxone (2 mg kg(-1), i.p.). Morphine (5 mg kg(-1), i.p.) induced analgesia that was increased by fluoxetine (0.32 mg kg(-1), i.p.). These results suggest that fluoxetine has an antinociceptive effect in tonic inflammatory pain through functional alteration of the serotonergic system and also potentiates the analgesic effect of morphine.     

Mazindol and lidocaine are antinociceptives in the mouse formalin model: involvement of dopamine receptor

The antinociceptive potential of mazindol, an anorectic drug, and lidocaine, an amide-type local anesthetic, were investigated in the mouse formalin test with concurrent motor function assessment. In addition, the role of dopamine and opioid receptors in mediation of the antinociceptive action of these drugs was examined. The i.p. injection of mazindol (1.25–10 mg/kg) and lidocaine (10–30 mg/kg) induced significant antinociceptive responses in both phases of the test. Cocaine (20 mg/kg, i.p.), used as positive control, also inhibited the pain responses caused by formalin. Haloperidol (0.2 mg/kg, i.p.), and sulpiride (5 mg/kg, i.p.), a dopamine D₂ receptor antagonist, reduced the antinociceptive actions of mazindol and cocaine, while SCH 23390, R(+)-7-chloro 8-hydroxy-3methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3 benzazepine (0.03 mg/kg, i.p.), a dopamine D₁ receptor antagonist, did not affect these responses. Only the antinociception associated with mazindol was reversed by naloxone (2 mg/kg, i.p.). The same pretreatments failed to modify lidocaine-induced antinociception. The drug conditions used in this study did not reveal any motor impairment in the rotarod test. These observations suggest an involvement of dopaminergic mechanisms, mainly via dopamine D₂ receptors, in the antinociceptive action of mazindol in the formalin test, but the nature of mechanisms involved in the lidocaine responses remains unsolved.     

Comparison of benzodiazepine (BZ) receptor agonists in two rodent activity tests

The effects of four BZ receptor ligands in an operant test were compared with a rotarod test. In the operant test, rats were trained to pull a chain on a schedule that regulates the probability of delivery of food pellets to maintain a steady chain-pulling rate across a 1 h test session. For the rotarod test, mice were trained to remain on a rotarod for 2 min. Diazepam (0.1-3.0 mg/kg, i.p.), FG 8205 (0.1-3.0 mg/kg, i.p.), quazepam (3.0-60.0 mg/kg, i.p.) and zolpidem (0.3-10.0 mg/kg, i.p.) each produced dose-related impairments of performance in both the chain- pulling test and the mouse rotarod test. Furthermore, the impairment in performance induced by FG 8205 (10.0 mg/kg, p.o.) was dose-dependently reversed by the BZ receptor antagonist, flumazenil (1.0-10.0 mg/kg, i.p.), indicating that the chain-pulling deficit was mediated via BZ receptor activation. Diazepam, FG 8205 and quazepam all had comparable potencies in both the rotarod assay and the chain-pulling test. However, zolpidem suppressed the chain-pulling rates at a dose 30-fold lower than that required to induce a significant deficit in the rotarod performance. As zolpidem is a preferentially sedative compound, this pattern of results is consistent with the hypothesis that the chain-pulling test is sensitive to sedation induced by BZ receptor agonists.     

Analysis of the antinociceptive effect of systemic administration of tramadol and dexmedetomidine combination on rat models of acute and neuropathic pain

The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible antinociceptive effect of systemic administration of tramadol and dexmedetomidine either alone or in combination on acute and neuropathic pain models in rats. The antinociceptive effects of intraperitoneal (i.p.) tramadol (5-20 mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (5-20 microg/kg) and three different combinations of tramadol+dexmedetomidine (5+5, 5+10 and 10+5, mg/kg+microg/kg, respectively) were measured by tail-flick and hot-plate methods in acute pain. The effects on the sciatic nerve ligation-induced neuropathic pain was tested by i.p. administration of tramadol (5 mg/kg), dexmedetomidine (5 microg/kg) and tramadol+dexmedetomidine combination (5+5) using a thermal plantar test. Sedation/motor-incoordination was assessed on rotarod. Tramadol and dexmedetomidine produced dose-related antinociception in tail-flick and hot-plate tests. In both tests, combination of these drugs produced an antinociceptive effect that is greater than that produced by tramadol or dexmedetomidine alone at several time points. In hot-plate test, tramadol+dexmedetomidine combination (5+10) exerted the strongest antinociceptive effect, while tramadol+dexmedetomidine combination (10+5) was significantly most effective in tail-flick test. In the neuropathic pain, the antinociceptive effect exerted by tramadol+dexmedetomidine combination (5+5) was also significantly greater than their applications alone. In rotarod test, tramadol (30 and 40 mg/kg), dexmedetomidine (30 and 40 microg/kg), tramadol+dexmedetomidine combination (10+10, 20+20) produced sedation/motor-incoordination, whereas tramadol (5-20 mg/kg), dexmedetomidine (5-20 microg/kg) and tramadol+dexmedetomidine combination (5+5, 5+10 and 10+5) did not produce any effect on sedation/motor-incoordination. The combination of tramadol and dexmedetomidine was more effective in increasing the pain threshold in acute and neuropathic pain when compared with the administration of either of these drugs alone.     

Attenuation of visceral nociception by alpha- and beta-amyrin, a triterpenoid mixture isolated from the resin of Protium heptaphyllum, in mice

In the search for novel natural compounds effective against visceral nociception, the triterpenoid mixture alpha- and beta-amyrin, isolated from Protium heptaphyllum resin, was assessed in two established mouse models of visceral nociception. Mice were pretreated orally with alpha- and beta-amyrin (3, 10, 30, and 100 mg/kg) or vehicle, and the pain-related behavioral responses to intraperitoneal cyclophosphamide or to intracolonic mustard oil were analyzed. The triterpenoid mixture showed a dose-related significant antinociception against the cyclophosphamide-induced bladder pain, and at 100 mg/kg, the nociceptive behavioral expression was almost completely suppressed. Intracolonic mustard oil-induced nociceptive behaviors were maximally inhibited by 10 mg/kg alpha- and beta-amyrin mixture in a naloxone-reversible manner. While pretreatment with ruthenium red (3 mg/kg, s. c.), a non-specific transient receptor potential cation channel V1 (TRPV1) antagonist, also caused significant inhibition, the alpha (2)-adrenoceptor antagonist, yohimbine (2 mg/kg, s. c.), showed no significant effect. The triterpene mixture (10 mg/kg, p. o.) neither altered significantly the pentobarbital sleeping time, nor impaired the ambulation or motor coordination in open-field and rotarod tests, respectively, indicating the absence of sedative or motor abnormalities that could account for its antinociception. These results indicate that the antinociceptive potential of alpha- and beta-amyrin possibly involves the opioid and vanilloid (TRPV1) receptor mechanisms and further suggests that it could be useful to treat visceral pain of intestinal and pelvic origins.     

Activation of spinal histamine H3 receptors inhibits mechanical nociception

Previous studies have suggested a possible pain-modulatory role for histamine H₃ receptors, but the localization of these receptors and nature of this modulation is not clear. In order to explore the role of spinal histamine H₃ receptors in the inhibition of nociception, the effects of systemically (subcutaneous, s.c.) and intrathecally (i.t.) administered histamine H₃ receptor agonists were studied in rats and mice. Immepip (5 mg/kg, s.c.) produced robust antinociception in rats on a mechanical (tail pinch) test but did not alter nociceptive responses on a thermal (tail flick) test. In contrast, this treatment in mice (immepip, 5 and 30 mg/kg, s.c.) did not change either mechanically or thermally evoked nociceptive responses. When administered directly into the spinal subarachnoid space, immepip (15–50 μg, i.t.) and R--methylhistamine (50 μg, i.t.) had no effect in rats on the tail flick and hot plate tests, but produced a dose- and time-dependent inhibition (90–100%) of nociceptive responses on the tail pinch test. This attenuation was blocked by administration of thioperamide (10 mg/kg, s.c.), a histamine H₃ receptor antagonist. Intrathecally administered thioperamide also reversed antinociceptive responses induced by systemically administered immepip, which demonstrates a spinal site of action for the histamine H₃ receptor agonist. In addition, intrathecally administered immepip (25 μg) produced maximal antinociception on the tail pinch test in wild type, but not in histamine H₃ receptor knockout (H₃KO) mice. These findings demonstrate an antinociceptive role for spinal histamine H₃ receptors. Further studies are needed to confirm the existence of modality-specific (i.e. mechanical vs. thermal) inhibition of nociception by these receptors, and to assess the efficacy of spinally delivered histamine H₃ receptor agonists for the treatment for pain.     

The involvement of endogenous opioid mechanisms in the antinociceptive effects induced by antidepressant drugs, desipramine and trimipramine

The present study was designed to investigate the involvement of endogenous opioid systems in the antinociception induced by the antidepressant drugs, desipramine and trimipramine. For this purpose, the antinociceptive effects of desipramine (7.5 and 15.0 mg/kg i.p.) and trimipramine (5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg i.p.) were compared to that induced by morphine (0.2 and 2.0 mg/kg i.p.) in the tail-clip model in mice. Naloxone (0.3 and 3.0 mg/kg i.p.), a non-specific opioid receptor antagonist, inhibited morphine-induced antinociception in mice, whereas the antinociceptive effects of antidepressant drugs were found to be resistant to naloxone blockade to some extent, since only the higher concentration of naloxone (3.0 mg/kg i.p.) caused significant inhibition of the effects of antidepressant drugs. In contrast, naltrindole (1.0 mg/kg i.p.), a specific delta-receptor antagonist, inhibited antinociception induced by desipramine and trimipramine in this test, while it inhibited the antinociceptive effect of morphine only partly. None of the opioid antagonists produced a significant effect in the tail-clip experiment when they were injected alone. Based on these findings, we concluded that endogenous opioids are involved in the antinociceptive effects of the antidepressant drugs using different mechanisms.     

Dopaminergic involvement in adenosine A1 receptor-mediated antinociception in the tail flick latency model in mice

The interaction between the adenosinergic and dopaminergic systems in nociception was assessed in the tail flick latency (TFL) test in mice. Adenosine exhibited qualitatively different responses depending on the dose: Adenosine 10 and 100 mg/kg i.p. caused antinociception as evidenced by an increase in TFL while the middle dose of 30 mg/kg decreased TFL. On the other hand, the specific adenosine A1 receptor agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) at doses of 0.05, 0.1, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg (i.p.) resulted in dose-dependent antinociception. The antinociceptive effect of CPA was reversed by classical albeit nonspecific adenosine receptor antagonist theophylline (5 mg/kg) at a dose which had no effect on TFL per se. A low dose (1 mg/kg i.p.) of the dopaminergic agonist apomorphine caused an early mild hyperalgesic response while the high dose (10 mg/kg i.p.) had no significant effect on TFL. The antinociceptive effect of CPA was attenuated by pretreatment with low dose apomorphine while pretreatment with the high dose caused mild but insignificant potentiation. Theophylline, when administered prior to apomorphine failed to modify the nociceptive response. The results suggest that an interaction between adenosine and dopamine may be involved in nociception.     

Serotonergic mechanism in imipramine induced antinociception in rat tail flick test

Substantial evidence has accumulated that spinally projecting serotonergic neurons modulate nociception. However, the exact receptor subtypes that mediate the antinociceptive response of serotonin within the spinal cord continue to be a subject of debate. Therefore, we explored the effect of serotonergic system on imipramine induced antinociception by using 5-Hydroxytryptamine-3 (5HT3) receptor antagonist ondansetron and 5-Hydroxytryptamine-2 (5HT2) receptor antagonist mianserine, and depletion of brain 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5HT) with p-chlorophenyl alanine (PCPA). Male wistar strain rats were pretreated with either ondansetron (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) or mianserine (1 mg/kg, i.p.). After 15 minutes, rats received injection of imipramine (10 mg/kg). Nociception was assessed by tail-flick method. Imipramine (2 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, and 20 mg/kg) produce antinociceptive response in the dose dependent manner. Prior treatment with 5HT3 antagonist, Ondansetron and 5HT2 antagonist, mianserine reduce the antinociceptive response of imipramine. In PCPA treated rats imipramine (10 mg/kg) failed to produce antinociception. These results indicate that the 5HT plays an important role in imipramine induced antinociception.     

Antinociception induced by amitriptyline and imipramine is mediated by alpha2A-adrenoceptors

The involvement of alpha2-adrenoceptors in the antinociception induced by the tricyclic antidepressants amitriptyline and imipramine was investigated in mice by using the hot-plate and abdominal constriction tests. The antinociception produced by amitriptyline (15 mg/kg, i.p.) and imipramine (15 mg/kg, i.p.) was prevented by reserpine (2 mg/kg, i.p.) and yohimbine (3-10 mg/kg, i.p.) but not by naloxone (1 mg/kg, i.p.), atropine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), CGP 35348 (100 mg/kg, i.p.) and prazosin (1 mg/kg, i.p.). On the basis of the above data, it can be postulated that amitriptyline and imipramine exerted their antinociceptive effect by activation of alpha2-adrenoceptors. Administration of the alpha2A-adrenoceptor antagonist BRL 44408 (1 mg/kg, i.p.) prevented amitriptyline and imipramine antinociception, whereas the alpha2B/C-adrenoceptor antagonist ARC 239 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) was ineffective. These data indicate that the enhancement of the pain threshold produced by amitriptyline and imipramine is mediated by activation of alpha2A-adrenoceptors. Neither tricyclic antidepressants nor the antagonists used impaired mouse performance evaluated by the rota-rod and hole-board tests.     

Antinociceptive effect of amikacin and its interaction with morphine and naloxone.

Amikacin sulphate (30 mg kg(-1)) administered either intraperitoneally (i.p.) or subcutaneously (s.c.) produced antinociceptive effect in BALB/c mice in the acetic acid writhing test which is employed as an inflammatory pain model. The lack of difference between two routes with regard to antinociceptive potency was taken as evidence for the absence of a local effect. Amikacin sulphate-induced antinociception seems unlikely to be due to non-specific behaviour alteration, since this drug, at a dose range of 15-100 mg kg(-1)did not affect motor coordination of mice in rot-a-rod test. Morphine (1 mg kg(-1)) also caused antinociception when administered i.p. or s.c. but the effect was greater with the latter route. At the i.p. site; the concurrent use of amikacin and morphine produced more remarkable antinociception compared to their individual usages. Besides, naloxone (2 mg kg(-1)) significantly decreased antinociceptive effect of amikacin but itself also exerted antinociception. At present, we have no plausible explanation for these findings at the i.p. site.     

Antinociception after both peripheral and intrathecal injection of oxotremorine is modulated by spinal nitric oxide.

The present study investigated the role of spinal nitric oxide (NO) in the antinociception induced by intraperitoneal (i.p.) and intrathecal (i.th.) injection of oxotremorine. The experiments were carried out on male Wistar rats, which had cannulas chronically implanted in the lumbar enlargement of the spinal cord. Antinociceptive effects were evaluated using a tail-flick and a paw pressure test. To raise the spinal NO level, the rats received the NO donor, 3-morpholino-sydnonimine (SIN-1, 10 and 100 microg/5 microl); to lower the NO level, the inhibitor of NO synthase, N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 50 and 400 microg/5 microl), was administered. Both those substances were injected i.th. Systemic injections of oxotremorine (0.02 and 0.1 mg/kg) produced a significant increase in the thermal nociceptive threshold, while the mechanical threshold was affected only by the higher dose (0.1 mg/kg) of the muscarinic agonist. I.th. injections of oxotremorine (0.1 ng, 1 ng, 1 microg/5 microl) produced significant antinociception in both those tests. I.th. administration of SIN-1 in doses which themselves did not affect the nociceptive threshold antagonized both the peripheral and central oxotremorine antinociception. I.th. administration of L-NAME (50 and 400 microg/5 microl) did not change the nociceptive threshold, but dose-dependently potentiated the effects of oxotremorine injected i.p. in both tests; however, the effect of i.th. administration of oxotremorine was potentiated only in the tail-flick test. Our results demonstrate that irrespective of the way of its injection, the antinociceptive effect of oxotremorine is modulated by activity of the spinal NO. Moreover, our results further support the hypothesis that NO present in the spinal cord exerts pronociceptive effects.     

Antinociceptive effects of tricyclic antidepressants and their noradrenergic metabolites.

This study evaluates the antinociceptive effect of several tricyclic antidepressants in four nociceptive tests which employ either thermal (hot plate and tail flick tests) or chemical (formalin and acetic acid tests) stimuli. Forced swimming test was also performed as a model of depression and an activity test was also performed. Mixed antidepressants in current clinical use: amitriptyline, imipramine and clorimipramine and their respective main secondary metabolites which preferentially inhibit noradrenaline reuptake: nortriptyline, desipramine and desmethylclorimipramine, were tested (2.5-20 mg/kg, i.p.) in mice. The results show a stronger antinociceptive effect in chemical tests induced by all the drugs, compared with thermal tests. The doses needed to produce antinociception were lower than those inducing an antidepressive effect, both effects being mutually independent. The overall results show that preferentially noradrenergic tricyclics induced an antinociceptive effect comparable with that of mixed tricyclics, indicating that noradrenaline reuptake plays an important role in tricyclic-induced antinociception.     

Pharmacological characterization of AM1710, a putative cannabinoid CB2 agonist from the cannabilactone class: antinociception without central nervous system side-effects

Cannabinoid CB₂ agonists produce antinociception without central nervous system (CNS) side-effects. This study was designed to characterize the pharmacological and antinociceptive profile of AM1710, a CB₂ agonist from the cannabilactone class of cannabinoids. AM1710 did not exhibit off-target activity at 63 sites evaluated. AM1710 also exhibited limited blood brain barrier penetration. AM1710 was evaluated in tests of antinociception and CNS activity. CNS side-effects were evaluated in a modified tetrad (tail flick, rectal temperature, locomotor activity and rota-rod). Pharmacological specificity was established using CB₁ (SR141716) and CB₂ (SR144528) antagonists. AM1710 (0.1-10 mg/kg i.p.) produced antinociception to thermal but not mechanical stimulation of the hindpaw. AM1710 (5 mg/kg i.p.) produced a longer duration of antinociceptive action than the aminoalkylindole CB₂ agonist (R,S)-AM1241 (1 mg/kg i.p.) at maximally antinociceptive doses. Antinociception produced by the low (0.1 mg/kg i.p.) dose of AM1710 was blocked selectively by the CB₂ antagonist SR144528 (6 mg/kg i.p.), whereas antinociception produced by the high dose of AM1710 (5 mg/kg i.p.) was blocked by either SR144528 (6 mg/kg i.p.) or SR141716 (6 mg/kg i.p.). AM1710 did not produce hypoactivity, hypothermia, tail flick antinociception, or motor ataxia when evaluated in the tetrad at any dose. In conclusion, AM1710, a CB₂-preferring cannabilactone, produced antinociception in the absence of CNS side-effects. Thus, any CB₁-mediated antinociceptive effects of this compound may be attributable to peripheral CB₁ activity. The observed pattern of pharmacological specificity produced by AM1710 is consistent with limited blood brain barrier penetration of this compound and absence of CNS side-effects.     

A comparison of the anti-nociceptive effects of voltage-activated Na+ channel blockers in the formalin test

We have used the rat formalin test to compare the anti-nociceptive properties of several voltage-activated Na(+) channel blockers. The antiarrhthymic mexiletine (37.5 and 50 mg/kg, i.p.) attenuated flinching behaviour in both first and second phases of the test compared with vehicle (P<0.05). The anti-convulsants lamotrigine (15 and 30 mg/kg, i.p.) and carbamazepine (20 mg/kg, i.p.) also inhibited second phase flinching behaviour compared with vehicle (P<0.05), although phenytoin (up to 40 mg/kg, i.p.) was without effect. Riluzole (5 mg/kg, i.p.), in contrast to lubeluzole (up to 10 mg/kg, i.p.) also inhibited second phase flinching behaviour compared with vehicle (P<0.05). When tested against an acute thermal nociceptive stimulus mexiletine, lubeluzole and riluzole exhibited anti-nociceptive effects. The anti-nociceptive doses used in the formalin test produced no motor impairment in the rotarod test. Thus, voltage-activated Na(+) channel blockers can attenuate nociceptive behaviour in the formalin test, and a specific mechanism of action on Na(+) channel function may be required for this to occur.