Paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions: a strategy of extensive lesion coverage with drug-eluting stents.

The recanalization of a chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO) is hampered by a high rate of lesion recurrence. The goal of the present study is to assess the effect of paclitaxel-eluting stents in CTOs in a strategy of extensive stent coverage and the optional use of additional bare metal stents (BMSs). In 82 consecutive patients, a CTO (duration > 2 weeks) was successfully recanalized with implantation of one or more Taxus stents. These patients underwent a repeat angiography after 5.0 +/- 1.5 months and were assessed by quantitative angiography. The patients were compared with 82 clinically and lesion-matched patients from a consecutive series of 148 patients with CTOs treated by BMS in the preceding time period. In 21 of the 82 patients, additional lesions in the target artery not directly related to the original occlusion site were treated with BMSs (hybrid approach). The history of diabetes, extent of coronary artery disease, clinical symptoms, and angiographic features were similar in the Taxus and BMS group. Periprocedural adverse events were 3.3% with Taxus and 3.3% with BMS, but 12 months MACE was significantly lower in the group with exclusive use of Taxus (13.3% vs. 56.7%; P < 0.001), mainly due to a lower target lesion revascularization of 10.0% as compared to 53.4% (P < 0.001). There was only one late reocclusion with Taxus (1.7%) as compared to 21.7% with BMS (P < 0.05). However, in the hybrid group, the MACE rate was considerably higher, with 33.3%. Our data of a 80% reduction of target vessel failure as compared to BMS, with a lower risk of late reocclusions without increased acute adverse events, demonstrate the benefit of paclitaxel-eluting stents in CTOs. However, diffuse atherosclerosis in CTOs should be covered completely by the drug-eluting stents.     

Drug-eluting stent-supported percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total coronary occlusion.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the clinical and angiographic outcomes after drug-eluting stent (DES)-supported percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO). BACKGROUND: There are few data about the efficacy of DES-supported PCI for CTO. METHODS: All consecutive patients who had a sirolimus-eluting stent or a paclitaxel-eluting stent implanted for CTO from December 2003 to December 2004 were analyzed. Clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients treated with DES were compared with a case-matched control group of patients treated with bare metal stents (BMS) in the 12 months before the routine use of DES. RESULTS: Successful DES-supported PCI was performed in 92 patients and 104 CTO. The case-matched control group consisted of 26 patients and 27 CTO successfully treated with BMS. There were no differences between groups in baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. Stent length in the DES group was higher as compared with that of BMS group (51+/-28 mm vs. 40+/-19 mm, P=0.073). The 6-month major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was lower in the DES group as compared with that of BMS group (9.8% vs. 23%, P=0.072). The angiographic follow-rate was 80% in the DES group and 81% in the BMS group. The 6-month restenosis rate was 19% in the DES group and 45% in the BMS group (P<0.001). By multivariate analysis, it was found that in the DES group, the only predictors of restenosis were stented segment length (OR 1.031, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, P=0.009) and a target vessel reference diameter<2.5 mm (OR 6.48, 95% CI 1.51-27.83, P=0.012), while the only predictor of MACE was stent length (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: DES implantation for CTO decreases the risk of mid-term restenosis and MACE. Small vessels and diffuse disease requiring the implantation of multiple stents and very long stents for full coverage of the target lesion are still associated with a relatively high risk of restenosis.     

Outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in patients with stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). BACKGROUND: Restenosis and recurrent cardiac events after percutaneous intervention are more common for lesions in the LAD than other native coronary arteries, and often necessitate bypass surgery. Drug-eluting stents may improve the long-term prognosis of this high-risk group. METHODS: In the TAXUS-IV trial, 1,314 patients with single de novo coronary lesions were assigned to implantation of the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent or an identical bare-metal stent; 536 (41%) randomized patients had LAD lesions. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients with LAD lesions were well-matched between the randomized groups. Late lumen loss at nine months after paclitaxel-eluting and control stent implantation were 0.28 +/- 0.51 mm and 0.54 +/- 0.57 mm, respectively (p = 0.0004), and binary restenosis rates were 11.3% and 26.9%, respectively (p = 0.004). At one year, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 13.5% of TAXUS-treated patients versus 21.2% treated with the control stent (p = 0.01). The need for bypass surgery at one year was reduced among patients randomized to the TAXUS stent (2.6% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.02). In the proximal LAD subgroup (n = 126), the one-year target vessel revascularization rate was 7.9% with the TAXUS stent and 18.6% with the bare-metal stent (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to bare-metal stents, implantation of polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stents in LAD lesions is safe, and reduces angiographic restenosis and MACE one year. Notably, the need for bypass graft surgery due to restenosis is reduced after TAXUS stent implantation in LAD lesions.     

Immediate and mid-term outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for chronic total occlusions.

AIMS: To evaluate the outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation for the treatment of chronic total occlusion (CTO). METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 122 patients who underwent revascularization in CTO lesions with SES from April 2002 to April 2004 (SES group). A control group was composed of 259 consecutive patients with CTO lesions treated with bare metal stents (BMS) in the 24 months immediately before the introduction of SES (BMS group). At 6-month follow-up, the cumulative rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was 16.4% in the SES group and 35.1% in the BMS group (P<0.001). The incidence of restenosis was 9.2% in the SES group and 33.3% in the BMS group (P<0.001). The need for revascularization in the SES group was significantly lower, both target lesion revascularization (7.4 vs. 26.3%, P<0.001) and target vessel revascularization (9.0 vs. 29.0%, P<0.001). BMS implantation (HR: 2.97; 95% CI: 1.80-4.89; P<0.001), lesion length (>20 mm) (HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.37-2.99; P=0.0004), and baseline reference vessel diameter (>2.8 mm) (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.92; P=0.02) were identified as predictors of MACE during 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Compared with BMS, SES implantation in CTO lesions appears to be effective in reducing the incidence of restenosis and the need for revascularization at 6 months.     

Significant reduction in restenosis after the use of sirolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of chronic total occlusions

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO). BACKGROUND: Long-term results after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the treatment of CTOs is hindered by a significant rate of restenosis and reocclusion. In the treatment of relatively simple nonocclusive lesions, SESs have shown dramatically reduced restenosis rates compared with bare metal stents (BMS), but whether these results are more widely applicable is unknown. METHODS: From April 2002, all patients at our institution were treated with SES as the device of choice during PCI. During the first six months, 563 patients were treated solely with SES, with treatment of a de novo CTO in 56 (9.9%). This CTO cohort was compared with a similar group of patients (n = 28) treated in the preceding six-month period with BMS. RESULTS: At one year, the cumulative survival-free of major adverse cardiac events was 96.4% in the SES group versus 82.8% in the BMS group, p < 0.05. At six-month follow-up, 33 (59%) patients in the SES group underwent angiography with a binary restenosis rate (>50% diameter stenosis) of 9.1% and in-stent late loss of 0.13 +/- 0.46 mm. One patient (3.0%) at follow-up was found to have reoccluded the target vessel. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SESs in the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions is associated with a reduction in the rate of major adverse cardiac events and restenosis compared with BMS.     

One-year results of the SCORPIUS study: a German multicenter investigation on the effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents in diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to analyze the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in a high-risk group of diabetic patients. Previously, this had been analyzed only in substudies of larger trials or in clinical investigations enrolling a small number of patients. BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents are highly effective in reducing the rate of in-stent restenosis. METHODS: Two hundred patients with diabetes and de novo coronary artery lesions were enrolled in 16 centers: 98 were randomly assigned to sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and 102 received bare-metal stents (BMS). The primary end point was in-segment late luminal loss. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate was analyzed at 30 days and 8 and 12 months. RESULTS: The extent of in-segment late luminal loss in the SES group was 0.18 mm compared with 0.74 mm in the BMS group. In-segment restenosis was identified on follow-up angiography in 8.8% of the patients in SES and in 42.1% in BMS (p < 0.0001). Target lesion revascularization was performed in 5.3% of the patients in SES and in 21.1% of the patients in BMS (p = 0.002). The SES was effective in the treatment group with oral diabetic medication as well as in the insulin-dependent treatment group (3.6% SES vs. 38.8% BMS). There was no subacute stent thrombosis in the SES group up to 1 year. The MACE rate was not significantly different at 30 days. At 12 months, MACE rate was 14.7% in SES versus 35.8% in BMS. CONCLUSIONS: The SES is safe and highly effective in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease and associated with a significant decrease in the extent of late luminal loss.     

Single-center randomized evaluation of paclitaxel-eluting versus conventional stent in acute myocardial infarction (SELECTION)

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the superiority of the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in reducing neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) over its corresponding bare metal stent (BMS) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Primary PCI with stent implantation is the repercussion strategy of choice for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); nonetheless restenosis rate is still high. Drug-eluting stents have been proven to reduce restenosis rate in many settings, but their use during primary PCI is still controversial. METHODS: Consecutive patients with STEMI <12 hours were randomized to receive PES or BMS. The primary end-point was the percentage of the stent volume obstructed by neointimal proliferation (NIH) measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at a 7-month angiographic follow-up. Secondary end-points were binary restenosis rate and major adverse cardiac events (MACE, i.e., death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization). RESULTS: Eighty patients with STEMI were randomized into the PES or BMS group. Patients were well matched for baseline characteristics and the index procedure was always successful. In-hospital and 1-month MACE were 2.5% per group. NIH at 7 months was 4.6% versus 20% (P< 0.01), late lumen loss 0.1 versus 1.01 mm (P = 0.01). MACE were 7.5% versus 42.5% (P = 0.001) with no difference in death and recurrent myocardial infarction rates. Late-acquired incomplete stent apposition (ISA) rate was 5.1% versus 2.7% (P = 0.65). One subacute stent thrombosis was reported in each group. CONCLUSIONS: PES was superior to its corresponding BMS in reducing NIH in the STEMI setting without any increase in early and long-term clinical adverse events.     

Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients with Chronic Renal Insufficiency

Background: Chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) is associated with an increased incidence of restenosis and stent thrombosis. Drug-eluting stents (DES), when compared to bare metal stents (BMS), reduce the incidence of restenosis in these patients. This study aimed to examine whether there are differences in clinical outcome after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) versus paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in patients with CRI who are subjected to coronary intervention.
Methods: A cohort of 570 patients with CRI who underwent intervention with DES (346 with SES and 224 with PES) were followed clinically up to 1 year and the clinical events were recorded and compared between groups.
Results: Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar, with a slightly higher number of diseased vessels in the SES group as compared to the PES group (2.3 ± 0.9 vs 2.1 ± 0.9, P = 0.06). The overall rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis were similar. The PES group had lower revascularization rates when compared to the SES group. After covariate adjustment, however, there was no difference seen in target vessel revascularization between stent types (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.3 [0.8–6.2], P = 0.110). The strongest predictor of death and MACE at 1 year was the number of diseased vessels.
Conclusions: Patients with CRI who undergo PCI with either SES or PES have similar repeat revascularization rates and acceptable stent thrombosis rates, although they continue to have high MACE and death rates. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:33–39)     

Three-year clinical outcomes after coronary stenting of chronic total occlusion using sirolimus-eluting stents: insights from the rapamycin-eluting stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital-(RESEARCH) registry.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that the 1-year survival-free from target lesion revascularization was 97.4% in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). There are currently no long-term results of the efficacy of SES in this subset of lesions. We assessed the 3-year clinical outcomes of 147 patients with CTO treated with either SES or bare metal stents (BMS). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 147 (BMS = 71, SES = 76) patients were included. Four patients died in the BMS group while five patients died in the SES group, P = 0.8; two myocardial infarctions occurred in both groups, P = 0.9; and target vessel revascularization was performed in nine patients in the BMS and seven in the SES group, P = 0.5. The cumulative event-free survival of MACE was 81.7% in BMS group and 84.2% in SES group, P = 0.7. Two patients of the SES group had a coronary aneurism at 3-year angiographic follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SES was no longer associated with significantly lower rates of target vessel revascularization and major adverse cardiac events in patients with CTOs after 3 years of follow-up compared with BMSs.     

Effects of oral prednisone after stenting in a rabbit model of established atherosclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of systemic prednisone in combination with a bare-metal stent (BMS) or a paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus, Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) on neointimal inhibition and vessel healing in an atherosclerotic rabbit model. BACKGROUND: Inflammation plays a critical role in neointimal formation after coronary artery stenting. The efficacy of immunosuppressive doses of oral prednisone to inhibit in-stent neointimal proliferation was compared with BMS and with a commercially available paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus) in a rabbit model of established atherosclerosis. METHODS: Bilateral iliac artery injury in atherosclerotic New Zealand White rabbits fed an atherogenic diet was followed by stent implantation. Animals randomly received Taxus stents, BMS (Express, Boston Scientific Corp.) and placebo, or BMS and oral prednisone (2.1 mg/kg/day for the first 7 days, followed by 1.4 mg/kg/day for 14 days and 0.7 mg/kg/day for 21 days). Stented arterial segments were harvested at 42 days and processed for light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and organoid culture. RESULTS: Compared with control subjects, prednisone-treated animals showed a 30% reduction in percent stenosis (p = 0.009), a 35% decrease in neointimal area (p < 0.003), and a 66% decrement in neointimal thickness (p < 0.001). Taxus stents also reduced all 3 parameters significantly (-34%, -39%, and -83%, respectively), but showed significantly more inflammatory cells and fibrin deposition and less endothelialization compared with the other 2 groups. Plaque burden was equal among groups, as shown by the identical stent and vessel area, and no remodeling was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic prednisone treatment and Taxus stents reduce neointimal formation compared with BMS. The extent of neointimal reduction is similar between prednisone- and Taxus stent-treated animals; however, Taxus stents resulted in a significantly greater delay in healing. Targeting of inflammatory pathways after percutaneous coronary intervention may be an efficacious way to prevent restenosis without the long-term risk of late thrombosis.     

Randomized trial of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in small coronary vessels.

AIMS: Sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents effectively reduce restenosis in small coronary vessels. The relative efficacy of these drug-eluting stents in this high-risk subset is not known. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 360 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in native coronary vessels with a diameter of <2.80 mm received randomly paclitaxel-eluting stents (n=180) or sirolimus-eluting stents (n=180). The primary endpoint was in-stent late luminal loss. Secondary endpoints were angiographic restenosis and need of target lesion revascularization. The study intended to show that the paclitaxel-eluting stent is not inferior to the sirolimus-eluting stent with respect to the primary endpoint. The non-inferiority margin was set at 0.16 mm. Follow-up angiography was performed in 87% of the patients. In-stent late luminal loss in the paclitaxel-eluting stent group was 0.32 mm (upper 95% boundary, 0.42 mm), which was greater than that in the sirolimus-eluting stent group, failing to show the non-inferiority of the paclitaxel-eluting stent to the sirolimus-eluting stent (P>0.99). Angiographic restenosis was found in 19.0% of the lesions in the paclitaxel-eluting stent group and 11.4% of the lesions in the sirolimus-eluting stent group (P=0.047). Target lesion revascularization was performed in 14.7% of the lesions treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents and 6.6% of the lesions treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (P=0.008). CONCLUSION: The paclitaxel-eluting stent is associated with a greater late luminal loss and is less effective in reducing restenosis in small coronary vessels than the sirolimus-eluting stent.     

国产与进口西罗莫司药物洗脱支架治疗冠心病临床疗效对比

目的评估国产西罗莫司药物洗脱冠状动脉(冠脉)支架在冠心病患者中应用的安全性及1年临床随访结果,并与同期应用进口药物洗脱支架(Cypher和Taxus)比较。方法与结果2003年5月至2004年6月,共计673例经冠脉造影证实的冠心病患者接受药物洗脱支架治疗,其中接受国产西罗莫司药物洗脱支架(Firebird,上海微创公司)224例,进口西罗莫司药物洗脱支架(Cypher,美国强生公司)246例,进口紫杉醇药物洗脱支架(Taxus,美国波士顿公司)203例。各组基础临床情况及造影特征均相似,尽管Firebird组患者平均每例置入支架数目较多且支架总长度较长,但其住院总费用仍显著低于其他两组。术后1年临床随访严重心脏不良事件(包括心源性死亡、非致命性心肌梗死和靶血管再次血运重建)发生率在Firebird组为9·0%、Cypher组为8·4%、Taxus组为11·2%,相互比较差异无统计学意义。造影证实Firebird组2例(0·9%)、Cypher组2例(0·9%)和Taxus组3例(1·6%)发生支架内血栓形成。结论国产西罗莫司药物洗脱冠脉支架治疗冠心病安全,其1年临床疗效与进口西罗莫司及紫杉醇药物洗脱冠脉支架相似。     

Outcomes with the paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with acute coronary syndromes: analysis from the TAXUS-IV trial

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Whether the paclitaxel-eluting stent is safe and effective in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unknown. METHODS: In the TAXUS-IV trial, 1,314 patients with stable or unstable ischemic syndromes undergoing PCI were randomized to treatment with either the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent or a bare-metal EXPRESS stent (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts). The results were stratified by the acuity of the presenting clinical syndrome. RESULTS: Acute coronary syndromes were present in 450 patients (34.2%), 237 of whom were assigned to paclitaxel-eluting stents and 213 to bare-metal stents. The baseline and procedural characteristics were well matched between the groups. Clinical outcomes at 30 days were similar with both stents. At one-year follow-up, patients with ACS assigned to the paclitaxel-eluting stent compared to the control stent had strikingly lower rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) (3.9% vs. 16.0%, p < 0.0001) and major adverse cardiac events (11.1 vs. 21.7%, p = 0.002). By multivariate analysis, ACS was an independent predictor of in-stent restenosis in the cohort treated with bare-metal stents (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 3.92], p = 0.035), while among patients randomized to the paclitaxel-eluting stents, ACS was an independent predictor of freedom from restenosis (HR = 0.27 [95% CI 0.08 to 0.97], p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent was safe in patients with unstable ischemic syndromes, and was associated with marked reduction of ischemia-driven TLR and adverse cardiac events at one year.     

Comparison of dual drug-eluting Cilotax stent and paclitaxel-eluting Taxus Liberte stent in native coronary artery lesions

Cilotax stent is a new type of drug-eluting stent (DES) designed to increase the antirestenotic performance of the paclitaxel-eluting stent and decrease the risk of stent thrombosis by the incorporation of cilostazol. Therefore, we investigated the safety and efficacy of Cilotax dual DESs and compared their performance to that of paclitaxel-eluting Taxus Liberte. Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo coronary artery lesions at 2 centers in Korea were randomized to receive Cilotax (n = 55) or Taxus Liberte (n = 56) stents. The primary end point was in-segment late loss at 8 months. The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics. Cilotax stent was not inferior to Taxus Liberte stent as determined by in-segment late loss (0.28 ± 0.30 vs 0.42 ± 0.45 mm, difference -0.14, 95% confidence interval -0.27 to -0.01, 1-sided p = 0.028 for noninferiority). In-stent late loss was significantly lower in the Cilotax than in the Taxus Liberte group (0.22 ± 0.31 vs 0.50 ± 0.55 mm, p = 0.002). Although in-segment restenosis rate did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (3.8% vs 10.9%, respectively, p = 0.271), in-stent restenosis rate was significantly lower in the Cilotax stent group (0% vs 10.9%, p = 0.027). There was no stent thrombosis at 8 months in either group. Rates of death, myocardial infarction, and any target lesion revascularization at 8 months were 0%, 0%, and 1.9%, respectively, in the Cilotax group and 1.8%, 0% and 3.6%, respectively, in the Taxus Liberte group. In conclusion, the Cilotax stent was safe and effective in decreasing late loss, indicating that this stent represents a promising new type of DES system.     

不同药物洗脱支架四年临床结果比较

目的 观察雷帕霉素与紫杉醇药物洗脱支架(DES)置入后再狭窄率、支架内血栓形成及4年临床结果.方法 回顾性分析2003年1-10月连续237例置入DES患者6个月再狭窄率与靶病变重建率(TLR)、4年随访主要不良心脏事件(MACE)、靶血管重建(TVR)和支架血栓形成的发生率.结果 雷帕霉素组与紫杉醇组比较,6个月两组TLR、支架内再狭窄、MACE、心肌梗死差异均无统计学意义,但后者有更高的晚期管腔丢失(P=0.022).4年免于TVR生存率分别为88.97%与82.28%(P=0.127),免于MACE生存率分别为83.8%与79.2%(P=0.056).多变量分析每个病变置入支架数(P=0.001)和糖尿病(P=0.001)与TVR相关,多支病变(P=0.0013)和糖尿病(P:0.0001)与MACE相关.4年总的支架内血栓发生率(1.47%与1.98%)无统计学意义,肯定的很可能的和可能的支架内血栓形成两组之间也无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 两种药物洗脱支架均具有较好的安全性和临床近、远期效果,但紫杉醇洗脱支架晚期管腔丢失较多.     

Wiktor Stent for Treatment of Chronic Total Coronary Artery Occlusions: Short- and Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Results From a Large Multicenter Experience

Objectives. This study reports the first multicenter experience with the Wiktor coil stent for treatment of chronic total coronary artery occlusions (CTOs).Background. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of CTO is associated with very high restenosis and reocclusion rates. Coronary stenting has been proposed as a means of improving outcome. However, the Wiktor device for CTOs has never been tested in a large patient sample.Methods. From January 1993 to December 1996, 89 patients with 91 CTOs underwent Wiktor stent implantation after successful PTCA. The post-stenting regimen consisted of warfarin (Coumadin) plus aspirin in the initial 49 patients (55%) and aspirin plus ticlopidine in 40 patients (45%).Results. Stenting was successful in 87 patients (98%). At 1 month, 6% of patients had subacute stent thrombosis, 3% had a major bleeding event, and 1% had access-site complications. Subacute stent thrombosis showed univariate association with warfarin therapy (p = 0.009). Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 76 (93%) of 82 eligible patients. The restenosis rate was 32%, including 4% reocclusions. By multiple logistic regression analysis, restenosis was independently associated with multiple stents (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 27.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.25 to 79.95, p = 0.0008) and increasing values of occlusion length (adjusted OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.39, p = 0.001). Freedom from death, myocardial infarction or stented vessel revascularization was 87% and 72% at 1 and 3 years, respectively.Conclusions. Short- and long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes are favorable in patients undergoing Wiktor stent implantation in CTO. Further technical improvement is needed to reduce the restenosis rate in patients with long lesions and multiple stents.     

Long-term clinical outcomes with sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: five-year results of the RAVEL trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the clinical outcomes at 5 years in RAVEL (A Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Standard Stent for Coronary Revascularization), the first controlled trial of drug-eluting stents. BACKGROUND: The 6-month rate of angiographic coronary restenosis has been markedly lowered by sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). The long-term performance of drug-eluting stents, however, is under close scrutiny. METHODS: The trial included 238 patients (mean age 60.7 +/- 10.4 years, 76% men) with a single, de novo native coronary artery lesion, randomly assigned to treatment with SES versus bare-metal stents (BMS). Rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and percutaneous or surgical revascularization up to 5 years of follow-up, and rates of stent thrombosis were compared between the 2 treatment groups. RESULTS: Complete datasets were available in 92.5% of patients treated with SES and 89.1% of patients assigned to BMS. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year rates of survival free from target lesion revascularization (TLR) were, respectively, 99.2%, 93.8%, and 89.7% in the SES group versus 75.9%, 75.0%, and 74.0% in the control group (p < 0.001; log-rank). Rates of all MACE at 5 years were 25.8% in patients treated with SES versus 35.2% in patients assigned to BMS (p = 0.03; log-rank). Rates of stent thrombosis, per protocol or by the Academic Research Consortium definitions, were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year rate of TLR associated with SES was significantly lower than that with BMS. There was no apparent adverse effect associated with the use of SES, although the trial was not powered to examine uncommon complications.     

Outcomes with the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent in patients with diabetes mellitus: the TAXUS-IV trial

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of polymer-regulated site-specific delivery of paclitaxel in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing stent implantation. BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes is associated with high rates of restenosis and repeat revascularization due to excessive neointimal proliferation, a process that may be blunted with the site-specific delivery of paclitaxel. METHODS: In the TAXUS-IV trial, 1,314 patients were prospectively randomized to the slow rate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent or the bare-metal EXPRESS stent (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts). Medically treated diabetes was present in 318 patients (24%), 105 of whom required insulin. RESULTS: Among patients with diabetes, the TAXUS stent, compared to the bare-metal stent, reduced the rate of 9-month binary angiographic restenosis by 81% (6.4% vs. 34.5%, p < 0.0001), and reduced the 12-month rates of target lesion revascularization by 65% (7.4% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.0008), target vessel revascularization by 53% (11.3% vs. 24%, p < 0.004), and composite major adverse cardiac events by 44% (15.6% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.01). The one-year rates of cardiac death (1.9% vs. 2.5%), myocardial infarction (3.2% vs. 6.4%), and subacute thrombosis (0.6% vs. 1.2%) were comparable between the paclitaxel-eluting and control stents, respectively. In the insulin-requiring subgroup, the TAXUS stent reduced angiographic restenosis by 82% (7.7% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.0065), and reduced the one-year rate of target lesion revascularization by 68% (6.2% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.07), a relative reduction similar to patients without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The site-specific delivery of paclitaxel after coronary stent implantation is highly effective in reducing clinical and angiographic restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus.     

Promising efficacy of the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) on early and late outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: A series of 100 consecutive patients (September 2004 to November 2005)with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary stenting using SES ptember 24 hr) was compared with 100 consecutive patients (September 2003 to August 2004) treated with bare metal stent (BMS). The frequency of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis, and status of ticlopidine administration were assessed at 270 days. RESULTS: The rates of premature discontinuation of ticlopidine (SES group <3 months: 11%, BMS group <1 month: 11%, p = NS) and stent thrombosis (SES group: 1%, BMS group: 0%, p = NS) were similar in the two groups. At follow-up, restenosis rate and target vessel revascularization rate were lower in the SES group(4% vs 19%, p < 0.001 and 4% vs 10%, p = 0.149, respectively). Furthermore, the occurrence of MACE at 270 days was significantly less frequent in the SES group compared with the BMS group (6% vs. 17%, p = 0.038). Multivariate analysis showed SES use tended to predict 270-day MACE (hazard ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.14-1.02, p = 0.055). Culprit lesion located in the left main trunk was identified as an independent predictor of 270-day MACE (hazard ratio 5.43, 95% confidence interval 1.07-27.59, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a SES was not associated with increased risk of stent thrombosis compared with a BMS. With lower rates of restenosis and subsequent target vessel revascularization, SES placement could provide superior outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.     

多支冠状动脉病变患者1911例PCI二年疗效

目的评价多支冠状动脉病变（MVD）通过经皮冠状动脉介入（PCI）进行血运重建的长期疗效。方法1995年6月2003年12月连续2028例在我院成功接受PCI的MVD患者,对其心绞痛复发率、造影复查再狭窄率和主要不良心脏事件（MACE）的发生率进行回顾分析。结果2028例MVD患者,完全性血运重建率86.2%（1748/2028）,住院期间共死亡26例（总病死率1.3%）,对存活出院的2002例患者中的1911例随访24个月,随访率95.5%,其心绞痛复发率、造影复查再狭窄率和MACE发生率分别为10.7%、14.6%、25.4%,其中1754例植入普通金属支架（BMS）,157例植入药物洗脱支架（DES）。尽管DES组患者冠心病危险因素多、病变程度复杂,不稳定心绞痛占61.8%、糖尿病占41.4%、慢性完全闭塞病变（CTO）占37.6%、3支病变占58.0%,但心绞痛复发率、造影复查再狭窄率和MACE发生率均显著低于BMS组（分别为4.5%vs11.2%,3.2%vs15.7%,8.9%vs26.9%,均P<0.01）。结论PCI进行血运重建是治疗MVD的有效方法,但仍存在BMS支架术后不良事件发生率高,DES用于治疗MVD具有更好的长期疗效。