Failure of Third-Generation Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators to Abort Shock Therapy for onsustained Ventricular Tachycardia Due to Shortcomings of the VF Confirmation Algorithm

Unnecessary shocks by ICDs for rhythms other than sustained VT or VF have been described as the most frequent adverse event in ICD patients. To avoid unnecessary shocks for self-terminating arrhythmias, the third-generation Jewel PCD defibrillators 7202, 7219, and 7220 Plus use a specially designed VF confirmation algorithm after charge end. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of this VF confirmation algorithm to recognize nonsustained VT, and to analyze the reasons for failure of the PCD device to abort shock therapy for nonsustained VT despite use of this VF confirmation algorithm. Analysis of stored electrograms of electrical events triggering high voltage capacitor charging in the programmed VF zone of the device showed 36 spontaneous episodes of nonsustained VT (227 ± 21 beats/mm) during 18 ± 7 months follow-up in 15 patients who had a Jewel PCD implanted at our hospital. Intracardiac electrogram recordings and simultaneously retrieved marker channels demonstrated that the ICD shock was appropriately aborted according to the VF confirmation algorithm in 24 (67%) of 36 episodes of nonsustained VT. Twelve episodes (33%) of nonsustained VT, however, were followed by a spontaneous ICD shock in 6 (40%) of the 15 study patients. The only reason for all 12 shocks for nonsustained VT was the inability of the device to recognize the absence of VT after charge end due to shortcomings of the VF confirmation algorithm: 11 of the 12 shocks for nonsustained VT were triggered by the occurrence of paced beats during the VF confirmation period and 1 shock for nonsustained VT was triggered by the occurrence of 2 premature beats after charge end. Thus, better VF confirmation algorithms need to be incorporated in future PCD devices to avoid unnecessary shocks for nonsustained VT.     

A prospective randomized-controlled trial of ventricular fibrillation detection time in a DDDR ventricular defibrillator. Ventak AV II DR Study Investigators

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) with dual chamber and dual chamber rate responsive pacing may offer hemodynamic advantages for some ICD patients. Separate ICDs and DDDR pacemakers can result in device to device interactions, inappropriate shocks, and underdetection of ventricular fibrillation (VF). The objectives of this study were to compare the VF detection times between the Ventak AV II DR and the Ventak AV during high rate DDDR and DDD pacing and to test the safety of dynamic ventricular refractory period shortening. Patients receiving an ICD were randomized in a paired comparison to pacing at 150 beats/min (DDD pacing) or 175 beats/min (DDDR pacing) during ICD threshold testing to create a "worst case scenario" for VF detection. The VF detection rate was set to 180 beats/min, and VF was induced during high rate pacing with alternating current. The device was then allowed to detect and treat VF. The induction was repeated for each patient at each programmed setting so that all patients were tested at both programmed settings. Paired analysis was performed. Patient characteristics were a mean age of 69 +/- 11 years, 78% were men, coronary artery disease was present in 85%, and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.34 +/- 0.11. Fifty-two episodes of VF were induced in 26 patients. Despite the high pacing rate, all VF episodes were appropriately detected. The mean VF detection time was 2.4 +/- 1.0 seconds during DDD pacing and 2.9 +/- 1.9 seconds during DDDR pacing (P = NS). DDD and DDDR programming resulted in appropriate detection of all episodes of VF with similar detection times despite the "worst case scenario" tested. Delays in detection may be seen with long programmed ventricular refractory periods which shorten the VF sensing window and may be avoided with dynamic ventricular refractory period shortening.     

Electrocardiographically Documented Unnecessary, Spontaneous Shocks in 241 Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

The incidence and cause of electrocardiographically documented spontaneous implantuble Cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) discharges for a rhythm other than ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) (unnecessary shocks) were determined in 241 patients who underwent ICD implantation between March 1983 and November 1991. During follow-up of 24 ± 20 months, 54 of 241 patients (22%) received a total of 132 unnecessary ICD shocks confirmed by Holler or telemetry monitoring or stored electrograms (Egs) from the ICD. The rhythm preceding these unnecessary ICD shocks was atrial fibrillation in 30 patients, sinus or supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in 11 patients, antitachycardia pacing triggered by atrial fibrillation or SVT resulting in VT in 5 patients, nonsustained VT in 3 patients, and normal sinus or pacemaker rhythm in 10 patients. Unnecessary ICD discharges occurred most frequently during the first week after implantation or generator replacement (18 of 54 patients [33%]). Unnecessary ICD discharges could be documented more often by stored Egs in patients with devices with Eg storage capability (Ventritex Cadence(tm), 19 of 54 patients [35%]) than by Holter or telemetry monitoring in patients with devices without Eg storage capabilities (34 of 193 patients [18%], P < 0.01), despite a shorter mean follow-up duration of 14 ± 9 months versus 26 ± 21 months, respectively. Only six of 54 patients (11%) in whom unnecessary ICD discharges occurred had recurrent unnecessary shocks during 22 ± 20 months of follow-up after treatment directed at the cause of the first episode or device reprogramming to preclude non-VT rhythm detection. In conclusion, unnecessary ICD shocks are a frequent complication of ICD therapy occurring in at least 22% of patients. The cause of these shocks is most frequently atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response. The availability of Eg storage capabilities facilitates the diagnosis of the electrical event precipitating inappropriate ICD shocks. Diagnosis of the cause of unnecessary shocks allows for the institution of therapy that may reduce the risk for subsequent events.     

The Mean Ventricular Fibrillation Cycle Length: A Potentially Useful Parameter for Programming Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

In programming the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), the ventricular tachycardia (VT) detection cycle length (CL) is based on the CL of the documented tachycardia but the ventricular fibrillation (VF) detection CL is set arbitrarily. Appropriate programming of VF detection may not only reduce the incidence of inappropriate ICD shocks for non-VF rhythms but can also avoid the fatal underdetection of VF. The mean VFCL may provide a useful parameter for optimal ICD programming for VF detection if it is reproducible. This study examined the intrapatient reproducibility and interpatient variation of the mean VFCL in 30 ICD patients (25 men and 5 women, mean age 63 ± 13 years). A total of 210 VF episodes (7 ± 4 per patient, range 3–17) induced by T-wave shocks (166) or AC (44) at the ICD implant (30 patients) and the predischarge test (12 of 30 patients) were analyzed. The mean VFCL was calculated from the stored V-V intervals in the ICDs. Although the mean VFCL varied significantly from 171 ± 6 to 263 ± 11 ms (P < 0.01) among different patients, it was reproducible among different VF episodes in an individual patient (maximal variation 4–50 ms, P > 0.05). The mean VFCL was not significantly different between patients with and without antiarrhythmic drugs (210 ± 32 vs 210 ± 23 ms, P > 0.05) and was correlated with the ventricular effective refractory period (r = 0.5, P < 0.05). The mean VFCL varies greatly among different patients but remains reproducible in an individual patient, suggesting that the mean VFCL may serve as a reference for ICD programming of VF detection.     

Antitachycardia pacing for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with prophylactic cardioverter-defibrillator therapy

AIMS: Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) has not routinely been used in patients who received implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention of sudden death. This study investigated the efficacy of empirical ATP to terminate rapid ventricular tachycardia (VT) in heart failure patients with prophylactic ICD therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-three patients with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 22 +/- 7% (range: 9-35%) due to nonischemic or ischemic cardiomyopathy received prophylactic ICDs with empiric ATP. At least 2 ATP sequences with 6-pulse burst pacing trains at 81% of VT cycle length (CL) were programmed in one or two VT zones for CL below 335 +/- 23 ms and above 253 +/- 18 ms. Ventricular flutter and fibrillation (VF) with CL below 253 +/- 18 ms were treated in a separate VF zone with ICD shocks without preceding ATP attempts. During 38 +/- 27 months follow-up, 339 spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred in 36 of 93 study patients (39%). A total of 232 VT episodes, mean CL 293 +/- 22 ms, triggered ATP in 25 of 36 patients with ICD interventions (69%). ATP terminated 199 of 232 VT episodes (86%) with a mean CL of 294 +/- 23 ms in 23 of 25 patients (88%) who received ATP therapy. ATP failed to terminate or accelerated 33 of 232 VT episodes (14%) with a mean CL of 287 +/- 19 ms in 12 of 25 patients (48%) who received ATP therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Painfree termination of rapid VT with empirical ATP is common in heart failure patients with prophylactic ICD therapy. The occasional inability of empiric ATP to terminate rapid VT in almost 50% of patients who receive ATP for rapid VT warrants restrictive ICD programming with regard to the number of ATP attempts in order to avoid syncope before VT termination occurs.     

Absence of a morning peak in ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation events in nonischemic heart disease: analysis of therapies by implantable cardioverter defibrillators

A growing number of Japanese patients are being treated with ICDs. Efforts are warranted to minimize the rates of ICD shocks that cause discomfort and anxiety. The circadian distribution of ICD discharges was investigated in 80 patients (57+/-10 years of age, 69 men) from ten Japanese medical centers. The underlying heart disease was ischemic in 27 versus nonischemic in 53 patients. All patients had refractory VT or VF, and received appropriate shocks confirmed by stored data retrieved from the memory of the ICD. In the analysis of 354 appropriate shocks delivered in the overall population, a morning peak in VT or VF episodes was observed. However, subgroup analyses of the circadian distribution of ICD shocks revealed that the morning peak in VT or VF episodes was confined to patients with ischemic heart disease and was blunted by treatment patients with beta-adrenergic blockers. The absence of a morning peak in appropriate ICD shocks among patients with nonischemic heart disease remains unexplained and was unrelated to the use of beta-adrenergic blockers. In conclusion, the circadian pattern of appropriate ICD discharges was related to the underlying heart disease. In patients with ischemic heart disease, recurrences of VT or VF peaked in the morning. In contrast, in patients without ischemic heart disease, the episodes of VT or VF were evenly distributed during waking hours. Beta-adrenergic blockers appeared to blunt the morning peak in VT or VF among patients with ischemic heart disease.     

Transtelephonic Monitoring and Transmission of Stored Arrhythmia Detection and Therapy Data From an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

A new transtelephonic monitoring device designed for use with implantable Cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) was evaluated. It is capable of interrogating ICDs and transmitting the following data via telephone: programmed parameters (e.g., ventricular tachycardia [VT] and ventricular fibrillation [VF] detection, therapies), number of VT and VF episodes, identification of successful therapies, the 20 cycle lengths preceding the last episode detected, the 10 cycle lengths after the last delivered therapy, battery voltage, and real-time transmission of the patient's rhythm. Eighteen patients (mean age 64 ± 17years; 15 males) were implanted with an ICD and epicardial lead system. The patients who did not live near the primary hospital were provided with this transmitter and instructed to transmit monthly and whenever presyncope, syncope, or a shock were experienced. Five hundred ten episodes of spontaneous arrhythmia (495 VT, 15 VF) were detected in 14 of 18 patients in a 24-month period and the success of each therapy (antitachycardia pacing, cardioversion 0.4-34 J, defibrillation 34 J) was analyzed. The number of therapies delivered and their success (%) in terminating the arrhythmia were: 380 ramp/86%, 116 burst/84%, 119 cardioversion/57%, and 15 defibrillations/ 100%. Sixty-three (42%) of the 152 transmissions indicated an arrhythmia. Twenty-five (16%) of the 152 were transmitted because of symptoms. Sixteen (9.7%) of 165 VT episodes could not be terminated by the full set of programmed VT therapies. Analysis of the pre- and post-episode intervals along with the patient's transmitted rhythm indicated that sinus tachycardia or atrial fibrillation were likely responsible for these episodes. The transmitted data included the real-time ECG, which provided acute rhythm status plus stored data from the ICDs memory identifying the chronic arrhythmias detected, the therapies delivered, and the number and type of successful and ineffective therapies. This information provided the clinical data to the primary physician in order to determine the effectiveness of the programmed detection and therapy parameters and in some cases recommend to the home physician modifications to the device parameters or medication adjustments for enhanced arrhythmia control. We conclude that telephone transmission of stored ICD data is feasible and useful for patient management. It may obviate the need for patients experiencing symptoms to return to a site capable of device interrogation.     

Undersensing of Ventricular Fibrillation in a Noncommitted Nonthoracotomy Cardioverter Defibrillator System

Objective: Evaluation of the impact of undersensing on VF detection time and the relationship of undersensing to the programmed shock energy. Background: Failure to reconfirm an ongoing arrhythmia due to undersensing by a noncommitted ICD might prolong the time to therapy. Methods: We measured initial detection times and redetection times at predischarge and at 2 and 6 months in 29 patients (22 men, mean age 60 years) with a noncommitted nonthoracotomy ICD. Telemetry data and output markers were used to analyze each induction. Results: Undersensing hading to failure to reconfirm was present in 44 (11.1%) of 398 episodes of sustained VF and prolonged significantly the median initial detection time from 2.3 seconds (25th and 75th percentiles: 2 and 2.6 s, respectively) to 5.45 seconds (4.3 and 7.35 s. P < 0.0001). One episode required external defibrillation after reconfirmation failure occurred during charging; the total detection time prior to shock was 46 seconds. In a subset of 87 episodes with failed first shocks, the initial detection time was 2.3 seconds (2.1 and 2.8 s) and the redetection time 3 seconds (2.5 and 4.77 s. P < 0.0001). The presence of undersensing prolonged the redetection from 2.6 seconds (2.35 and 3.1 s) to 5.4 seconds (4.53 and 7.35 s, P < 0.0001). Undersensing was more prevalent during the redetection period (P = 0.004) and in episodes of sustained VF in which the first shock energy was higher than 15 f (19.7% vs 5.8%, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: In this automatic defibriliator system, undersensing occurs in 11% of the sustained VF inductions and prolongs detection time significantly. Redetection is longer than initial detection mostly due to the presence of undersensing, the frequency of which is proportional to the programmed energy. The clinical significance of this finding is unknown.     

Prevention of Inappropriate Shocks in ICD Recipients: A Review of 10,000 Tachycardia Episodes

Background: The efficacy of dual-chamber ICD arrhythmia classification algorithms is crucial to prevent inappropriate shocks. We report our experience from a meta-analysis of five prospective clinical studies with inclusion phases ranging between 1997 and 2003.
Methods: Dual-chamber ICD using standard dual-chamber arrhythmia classification algorithms were implanted in 802 patients (mean age = 64 ± 11 years, 88% men) in 74 medical centers. The ICD indication was secondary prevention in 95% of patients. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVT) were previously documented in 26% of patients. All spontaneous tachyarrhythmic events documented by the device memories were analyzed by a adjudicating committee. The episodes lasting >12 seconds and/or treated by the ICD were analyzed.
Results: Over a mean follow-up of 302 ± 113 days, 9,690 events were reported. Mean heart rate at the time of events was 131 ± 45 bpm (100–430). Events were classified as oversensing in 1.4%, sinus tachycardia (ST) in 66%, SVT in 13%, slow (<150 bpm) ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 8.7%, and VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 10.3%. The sensitivity of slow VT detection was 94%, and of VT/VF detection 99.3%. The specificity of sinus rhythm/ST/SVT recognition was 94%, positive predictive value 79.3%, and negative predictive value 99.2%. A total of 1,918 episodes were treated in 330 patients: 1,472 appropriately in 213, and 446 inappropriately in 117 (15% of the overall population) patients. Only 62 episodes were inappropriately treated by shocks in 40 patients, representing 5% of the overall population.
Conclusions: In this conventional ICD population, the overall specificity of standard dual-chamber arrhythmia detection settings reached 94%. This feature allows efficient detection of fast as well as slow VT events with a very low rate of inappropriate shocks.     

Diagnostic Value of a Pacemaker High Rate Episode Counter When Programming the Ventricular Tachycardia Zone of an ICD

A 72-year-old man with an ICD and a pacemaker was presented with an episode of sustained VT that accelerated to VF. The ICD failed to detect the event and deliver therapy, despite a VT apparently within the VT detection zone. The ICD detected the event after degeneration to VF and delivered appropriate therapy. The high rate event feature of the pacemaker was useful in determining proper function of the ICD along with optimal programming of VT detection.     

Pitfalls of the concept of incremental specificity used in comparisons of dual chamber VT/VF detection algorithms

The concepts of incremental specificity and incremental positive predictive accuracy (PPA) have been proposed to measure the success of dual chamber cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) algorithms for tachyarrhythmia detection in improving specificity while maintaining very high sensitivity to detection of episodes of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF). While dual chamber VT/VF detection algorithms differ substantially among different ICD manufacturers, they all operate as "add-on" features to the single chamber elementary detection algorithms that are based on simple criteria of increased ventricular rate. The incremental specificity and PPA characterize the performance of the dual chamber detection operation in this "add-on" mode, that is within a database of rhythm episodes all meet the simple rate-based criteria. A statistical model of hypothetical devices has been used to demonstrate that the concepts of incremental specificity and PPA are very dependent on the composition of the database used to evaluate a particular dual chamber ICD. Because some sinus tachycardia and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias with regular atrioventricular conduction are more easily discriminated from true VT/VF than other supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, the model shows that rather than the performance of the dual chamber detection functions, the major contributor to the incremental specificity may be the proportion between the "easy" and "difficult" supraventricular episodes. The algorithms used by different ICD manufacturers to detect tachyarrhythmias based on ventricular rate are known to differ substantially in the ability to differentiate true VT/VF from other tachyarrhythmias. Consequently, the databases of rhythms against which the different dual camber ICDs are tested are also different in composition of different types of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Therefore, the values of incremental specificity and PPA reported by different manufacturers do not have an equivalent meaning and do not offer a valid comparison of the true performance of different dual chamber ICDs.     

Recurrent ventricular fibrillation during advanced life support care of patients with prehospital cardiac arrest

AIM OF THE STUDY: The response of recurrent episodes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) to defibrillation shocks has not been systematically studied. We analyzed outcomes from countershocks delivered for VF during advanced life support (ALS) care of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: Cohort of patients with prehospital cardiac arrest presenting with VF, treated by ALS ambulance staff following ERC Guidelines 2000. Biphasic defibrillators provided shocks increasing from 200 to 360J. Recorded signals were analyzed to determine, for each shock, if VF was terminated and if a sustained organized rhythm was restored within 60s. RESULTS: In 465 of the 467 patients enrolled, the initial VF episode was terminated within three shocks: 92%, 61%, and 83% responded to 200J first, 200J second and 360J third shocks, respectively. VF recurred in 48% of patients within 2min of the first episode, and in 74% sometime during prehospital care. In the 175 patients experiencing five or more VF episodes, single shock VF termination dropped from the first to the fifth episode (90-80%, p<0.001) without change in transthoracic impedance, yet the proportion returning to organized rhythms increased (11-42%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated refibrillation is common in patients with VF cardiac arrest. The likelihood of countershocks to terminate VF declines for repeated episodes of VF, yet shocks that terminate these episodes result increasingly in a sustained organized rhythm.     

ST-segment deviation following implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks: incidence,timing, and clinical significance

GUREVITZ, O., et al. : ST-Segment Deviation Following Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks: Incidence, Timing, and Clinical Significance. ST-segment analysis is frequently used during surgical procedures, while ST deviation is considered a sign of myocardial injury. ST deviations were reported following transthoracic and epicardial electrical shocks. The prevalence, timing, and clinical significance of ST-segment deviation following endocardial ICD shocks are discussed in this article. Twenty-eight patients undergoing 125 shock episodes during ICD implantation or testing were included. A 12-lead ECG was recorded at baseline, continuously during the first 3–10 seconds, 1 minute after test shocks, 3–10 seconds and 1 and 5 minutes after each shock given to terminate VF. ST deviation was diagnosed when the ST-segment was displaced ≥ 1 mm in at least one lead compared to baseline. ST-segment deviations were observed after 49 (39%) of all shock episodes in 17 (61%) of patients. ST elevation was observed after 30 (24%) of all shock episodes, and ST depression after 31 (25%). Following 13 shock episodes in seven patients, ST-elevation and depression were observed. ST depressions occurred more frequently after shocks given to terminate VF than after lower energy test shocks (28% vs 18% respectively,  P = 0.045  ). However, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of ST elevations between the lower or higher energy shocks. No adverse clinical events were observed in patients with or without postshock ST-segment deviation. ST-segment deviation following endocardial ICD shocks is a frequent phenomenon, occurring acutely and resolving during the first few minutes postshock. It may have no prognostic implications.     

Results of Delivered Therapy for VT or VF in Patients with Third-Generation Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) offer tiered therapy and can provide significant advantage in the management of patients with life-threatening arrhythmias. Three different types of ICDs were implanted in 21 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Arrhythmia presentation was VT(76%), VF(10%), or both (14%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction for the group was 32.4 ± 7%. No surgical mortality occurred. Prior to discharge individual EPS determined the final programmed settings of the ICDs. During a mean follow-up of 13 ± 1.4 months (range 2–20) the overall patient survival was 85.7%. No sudden arrhythmic or cardiac death occurred. Twenty of 21 patients (95%) received therapy by their device. In 14 patients (67%) antitachycardia pacing (A TP) was programmed "on," 13 of which was self-adaptative autodecremental mode. There were 247 VT episodes, 231 of which were subjected to ATP with 97% success and 3% acceleration or failure. Low energy shocks reverted all other VT episodes. VF episodes were successfully reverted by a single shock (93%), two shocks (6%), or three shocks (1 %). We conclude that ATP therapy of VT is successful in the large majority of episodes with rare failures, and that VF episodes are generally terminated by a single ICD shock.     

Is Defibrillation Testing Safe?

Determination of defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) and implantable cardioverter defibrillalur (ICD) testing requires repeated inductions of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and defibrillation attempts using known energy outputs. Little is known about the individual and cumulative effects of repetitive brief episodes of VF and hypoperfusion on cerebral function. The potential clinical utility of quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG) monitoring during intraoperative ICD testing, by using processed 19-channel EEG (0.5–35 Hz bandwidth), was examined in ten anesthetized patients, five males and five females (mean age 62 ± 10 years), who underwent ICD implantation and testing. Ischemic QEEG patterns were defined as those with a 3 standard deviation increase (P < 0.01) in absolute delta (1.5–3.5 Hz) power persisting for ≥ 2.5 minutes. The majority (80%) of the VF episodes (70) were accompanied by QEEG "slowing" (doubling of the pre-VF low frequency delta waves amplitude). All the patients (5/5) experiencing > 6 VF episodes showed a statistically significant increase in the low frequency amplitude. In contrast, this EEG abnormality was apparent in only one of five patients experiencing < 6 VF episodes. These results suggest a cumulative QEEG depression associated with ICD testing. QEEG may provide an objective means for establishing an individualized upper safe limit of DFT testing and the total number of induced VF episodes.     

The dilemma of ICD implant testing

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) has been induced at implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implant to ensure reliable sensing, detection, and defibrillation. Despite its risks, the value was self-evident for early ICDs: failure of defibrillation was common, recipients had a high risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VF, and the only therapy for rapid VT or VF was a shock. Today, failure of defibrillation is rare, the risk of VT/VF is lower in some recipients, antitachycardia pacing is applied for fast VT, and vulnerability testing permits assessment of defibrillation efficacy without inducing VF in most patients. This review reappraises ICD implant testing. At implant, defibrillation success is influenced by both predictable and unpredictable factors, including those related to the patient, ICD system, drugs, and complications. For left pectoral implants of high-output ICDs, the probability of passing a 10 J safety margin is approximately 95%, the probability that a maximum output shock will defibrillate is approximately 99%, and the incidence of system revision based on testing is < or = 5%. Bayes' Theorem predicts that implant testing identifies < or = 50% of patients at high risk for unsuccessful defibrillation. Most patients who fail implant criteria have false negative tests and may undergo unnecessary revision of their ICD systems. The first-shock success rate for spontaneous VT/VF ranges from 83% to 93%, lower than that for induced VF. Thus, shocks for spontaneous VT/VF fail for reasons that are not evaluated at implant. Whether system revision based on implant testing improves this success rate is unknown. The risks of implant testing include those related to VF and those related to shocks alone. The former may be due to circulatory arrest alone or the combination of circulatory arrest and shocks. Vulnerability testing reduces risks related to VF, but not those related to shocks. Mortality from implant testing probably is 0.1-0.2%. Overall, VF should be induced to assess sensing in approximately 5% of ICD recipients. Defibrillation or vulnerability testing is indicated in 20-40% of recipients who can be identified as having a higher-than-usual probability of an inadequate defibrillation safety margin based on patient-specific factors. However, implant testing is too risky in approximately 5% of recipients and may not be worth the risks in 10-30%. In 25-50% of ICD recipients, testing cannot be identified as either critical or contraindicated.     

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Events in Patients with Asymptomatic Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia:

Primary prevention trials have demonstrated that patients with coronary disease, reduced left ventricular function, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) have improved survival with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, presumably secondary to effective termination of life-threatening arrhythmias. However, stored intracardiac electrograms were not always available and specific arrhythmias leading to ICD therapy were not always known. We examined the occurrence of ICD events in 51 consecutive patients who match the described patient profile to determine the frequency of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy. ICD detections were noted in 18 (35%) patients during a median follow-up period of 13.1 months. Appropriate therapy for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred in 11 (22%) patients, with appropriate shocks in 8 (16%) patients and appropriate antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in 4 (8%) patients. The time to first appropriate therapy occurred at a mean of 17 +/- 12 months (median 18 months, range 3-36 months). Inappropriate therapy occurred in 5 (10%) patients with inappropriate shocks in 4 patients and inappropriate ATP in 2 patients. Inappropriate therapy was delivered for supraventricular arrhythmias (SVAs) in 4 patients and for T wave oversensing in 1 patient. The reason for shock therapy was unknown in 1 patient (2%) due to ICD malfunction. The mean arrhythmia rate leading to appropriate therapy for VT/VF was 232 +/- 72 beats/min (range 181-400 beats/min), and the mean rate leading to inappropriate therapy for SVT was 168 +/- 10 beats/min (range 160-180 beats/min). Patients with coronary disease and asymptomatic NSVT commonly receive appropriate defibrillator therapy. These results support the need for ICD implantation for primary prevention, with attention to careful programming of the detection rate to prevent inappropriate therapy.     

Shock on T versus direct current voltage for induction of ventricular fibrillation: a randomized prospective comparison

VF is induced during ICD implantation to determine efficacy of therapy. Establishing the best clinical method of induction of VF would potentially be beneficial in reducing the number of induction attempts and reducing the frequency of inadvertent induction of VT. Commonly used methods to induce VF include shock in the T wave vulnerable period (T shock) and high frequency stimulation. This study compared the efficacy of T shock with a new induction method using a 9-V DC pulse. The study was a randomized, prospective, case crossover trial in patients receiving ICDs. VF was induced by T shock and DC in a randomized sequence during an ICD implant. VF was induced at least four times in each patient (two T shocks and two DC inductions) and with each induction; attempts were continued with modifications until successful. A paired evaluation between the T shock/DC induction was performed in 37 patients (28 men, age 64 +/- 12 years) with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.40 +/- 0.20. Arrhythmia indications were VT (n = 23), VF (n = 10), and VT/VF (n = 4). Drug therapy included amiodarone (n = 10), metoprolol (n = 6), digoxin (n = 1), and lidocaine (n = 1). The average T shock voltage was 207.0 +/- 16.1 V. The S1 cycle drive length was consistently 400 ms, and the mean S2 coupling interval was 317.8 +/- 19.6 ms. The length of time DC applied averaged 3.8 +/- 1.4 seconds. A total of 148 episodes of VF were included in the analysis. T shock induced VF with a cycle length of 213.5 +/- 35.1 ms, and DC induced VF with a cycle length of 214.6 +/- 34.5 ms (P = 0.86). Although VF was eventually induced for each randomization, the number of attempts required were dependent on the method of induction. The successful DC first attempt VF induction rate was 96%, with three patients requiring two attempts during one of the DC inductions. T shock had a 68% first attempt success rate with 21 patients requiring multiple T shocks to induce VF. All nine female patients had at least one unsuccessful first attempt T shock, which contributed to an overall unsuccessful first attempt induction rate significantly higher in women then men (36.1% vs 12.5%, P = 0.001). A constant DC voltage induction of VF may be more effective than T shock for induction of VF in a clinical setting because it reduces the number of attempts required to induce VF. By either method, VF appears to be more difficult to induce in women. DC induction has the advantage of simple programming of only duration of stimulation. These findings have implications particularly for ICD implantation with conscious sedation.     

New ICD-Technologies: First Clinical Experience with Dual-Chamber Sensing for Differentiation of Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias

Inappropriate ICD therapy for supraventricular arrhythmias remains an unsolved problem and may lead to serious clinical situations. Current algorithms for differentiation of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias are based on ventricular sensing solely and, therefore, lack semitivity and specificity. This preliminary analysis from a multicenter trial comprises data from the first 26 patients who received a Res-Q? Micron active-can ICD (Stdzer Intermedics) with a ventricular defibrillation lead and an additional bipolar lead for atrial sensing. Digitized atrial and ventricular waveform storage as well as interval charts from 102 induced and 30 spontaneous arrhythmia episodes were prospectively collected and analyzed with regard to appropriateness of ICD therapy. From all 132 arrhythmia episodes, high-quality stored dual-chamber intracardiac electrograms (JFXJM) could be retrieved for further analysis: in 40 (30%) episodes, atrial fibrillation (AF with rapid ventricular response 22, AF with VT9, AF with VF 9) was identified as the underlying intrinsic rhythm, and inappropriate ICD therapy was delivered in 4/22 (18%) episodes of AF with rapid ventricular response. In the remaining 92 (70%) episodes, sinus rhythm was the underlying atrial rhythm (SR with VT 13, SR with VF 79), and no inappropriate therapy was observed. Three of 22 (15%) high-energy shocks delivered for ventricular arrhythmias (VT 9, VF 9, rapid AF 4) terminated AF at the same time. In total, there were 3 complications (2 atrial lead dislodgments, I revision for bleeding). Both atrial lead dislodgments occurred in the 2 patients with passive-fixation leads compared to none in the 24 patients with active-fixation leads (p - 0.003). In conclusion, dual-chamber sensing and waveform storage of the new Res-Q? Micron offer very helpful diagnostic tools for the detection of inappropriate ICD-therapy. Placement of an additional atrial lead is safe and does not interfere with proper ICD function. However, for avoidance of atrial lead dislodgment, active fixation leads are recommended With the tested active-can lead configuration, the efficacy of successful atrial cardioversion by high-energy shocks delivered for ventricular arrhythmias seems to be low.     

Long-Term Clinical Experience with the EGM Width Detection Criterion for Differentiation of Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

UNTERBERG, C., et al. : Long-Term Clinical Experience with the EGM Width Detection Criterion for Differentiation of Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators. Inappropriate therapy by ICDs due to SVTs is an important problem. A third generation ICD with a new detection criterion ("EGM width criterion") for differentiation of SVTs and VTs by measuring the width of the intracardiac EGM was studied in 47 patients. A wide EGM was defined as the longest measured EGM plus 4–12 ms (programmed as EGM width threshold). EGM width detection function was programmed to the "Passive" mode so that no therapy was withheld. During a follow-up of  29.9 ± 8.3  (12–45) months, 489 spontaneous episodes were analyzed. SVTs occurred in ten patients with 305 episodes; 301 were correctly classified by use of the new detection criterion. In four patients four episodes were incorrectly detected as wide QRS tachycardias. Thus specificity for SVT was 98.7% (on a per episode basis) and 60% on a per patient basis. Of 184 VTs in 23 patients, 118 episodes were correctly classified (19 patients), however, in 4 patients 66 VTs were falsely detected as SVTs, 62 (94%) of which occurred in 1 patient with complete left BBB and continuously increasing QRS width in 12-lead surface ECGs. Overall sensitivity (on a per episode basis) for VT detection was 64.1% and 96.7% in patients with stable width of the QRS complex in a 12-lead surface ECG. These data show that this criterion is not superior to data on rate dependent detection criteria and furthermore not applicable in patients with complete BBB.