Fluoride release and uptake by glass ionomers

The aim was to study the fluoride release 1) from 7 and 15-month-old glass ionomer specimens after treating them with fluoride; 2) from fresh compared with matured material; and 3) from specimens stored for 29 months in running water. Glass ionomer test specimens which had been in running water for first 7 then 15 months were treated with a 50 ppm fluoride solution after which the specimens were again exposed to running water for first 24 h and then 1 wk. The fluoride release was measured after each of the two periods of time. The fluoride treated specimens released more fluoride than the nontreated ones. This effect was not observed with composite resin specimens which were studied for comparison. Fluoride release from fresh glass ionomer specimens was observed to be 3-10 fold compared to specimens that had matured for 3 days. The release of fluoride from specimens that had been in running water for 29 months was measured and the results were compared with those of earlier measurements. It was found that the release reached a constant level for all tested glass ionomers during the second year.     

Short- and long-term fluoride release from glass ionomers and other fluoride-containing filling materials in vitro

Abstract – Test specimens of seven different glass ionomer filling materials and one fissure sealant were exposed to running water for 2 yr. One amalgam and one composite, both containing fluoride, were included for comparison. The fluoride release from the specimens was measured periodically after storing the specimens for 24 h or 1 wk in a small amount of water. The fluoride release From the glass ionomers decreased with time and a constant level was reached for most products during the 2-yr period. The release was increased by lowering the _pH of the storage solution. The release from the glass ionomers was clearly greater than from the amalgam and the composite.     

Short- and long-term fluoride release from glass ionomer based liners

Abstract— The aim of the study was to measure the fluoride release from glass ionomer based liners/bases after storing the specimens for 24 h and for 6 months in running water. The fluoride release was greater in the beginning than after half a year. From most liner materials the initial and the long-term release was greater than from the glass ionomer filling material studied for comparison. From two liners the release was minimal, just at the detection limit.     

Inhibitory effect on S. mutans by fluoride-treated conventional and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements

The aim of the present study was to study the effect of fluoride gel treatment on fluoride release and inhibition of acid production of Streptococcus mutans by different glass ionomer cements. Test slabs of four glass ionomer materials were fitted into the bottom of a test tube. A layer of S. mutans cells was centrifuged onto the test slabs, and the specimens were incubated for 4 h in 1.7% sucrose solution. Incubations were made using fresh, aged (29 d), aged and F-treated (1.25% F-gel), and aged, F-treated and aged samples ( n = 15 per group). After each incubation, pH and F contents of the fluid phase were determined. The freshly mixed glass ionomer samples released large amounts of fluoride, and the pH fall in the fluid phase was significantly inhibited. For aged samples, the fluoride release decreased strongly and no inhibitory effect on acid production by S. mutans was seen. After application of fluoride gel, fluoride release and inhibitory effect were significantly higher than initially for all glass ionomer cements. In conclusion, all glass ionomer cements were able to take up fluoride and subsequently release it, which resulted in reestablishment of their antibacterial effect. The patterns of fluoride release and antibacterial action were virtually the same for conventional and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements.     

Fluoride release in vitro from various glass ionomer cements and resin composites after exposure to NaF solutions

The release of fluoride from 1) discs made from five glass ionomer cements and two composites, and 2) the same discs after exposure to different NaF solutions, were studied. The specimens were placed in distilled water for 10 wk. After 24 h and then once a week, the specimens were transferred to fresh distilled water. After 5 wk, the specimens were divided into four groups and exposed to 0, 0.02, 0.2 and 2% NaF solutions for 5 min. The fluoride release was highest during the first week after preparation, after which it decreased sharply and then more slowly. The amount of fluoride released was ordered: liner/base>restorative glass ionomer>composites. The composites released significantly less fluoride than the glass ionomer cements. After exposure to NaF, the fluoride release was significantly higher for the silver cermet material than for the other glass ionomers tested. From a clinical point of view, the results from this study imply that glass ionomer restorations may act as intraoral devices for the controlled slow release of fluoride at sites at risk for recurrent caries.     

Short- and long-term fluoride release from glass ionomer based liners.

The aim of the study was to measure the fluoride release from glass ionomer based liners/bases after storing the specimens for 24 h and for 6 months in running water. The fluoride release was greater in the beginning than after half a year. From most liner materials the initial and the long-term release was greater than from the glass ionomer filling material studied for comparison. From two liners the release was minimal, just at the detection limit.     

An in vitro study of fluoride release from a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after exposure to toothpaste slurries of different pH

. The aim of the study was to evaluate the fluoride release from an aged resin-modified glass ionomer (Vitremer) after exposure to five toothpaste slurries with different pH values. Cylindrical specimens of the material were leached in de-ionized water for 3 months and then exposed for 30 min daily for 10 days to three dentifrice slurries (20 specimens/group) containing 0.05% fluoride with pH values of 2.6, 5.7 and 8.3 and two non-fluoridated slurries with pH values of 2.5 and 5.7. A neutral NaF solution (0.05% F) was used as a control. During the 30 min exposure time, the fluoride concentration was gradually decreased in order to imitate the clinical situation. Thereafter, specimens were immersed individually in de-ionized water and the fluoride release determined. After the first day of exposure, all groups except one without fluoride (pH 5.7) showed significantly (P<0.05) increased fluoride release. After exposure to the fluoridated toothpaste slurry with pH 5.7, significantly (P<0.05) more fluoride was released compared to the toothpaste slurry with pH 8.3. Low pH (2.5 or 2.6) of the slurry resulted in a significantly (P<0.05) higher fluoride release, regardless of whether it was fluoridated or not. The total amount of fluoride released after exposure to the more acidic fluoride toothpaste slurry was greater than that released from the more acidic non-fluoride toothpaste and the less acidic fluoride toothpaste. Our data indicate that the fluoride release from the resin-modified glass ionomer studied may be in-creased after treament with an acidified NaF-toothpaste. Received: 24 January 2000 / Accepted: 20 July 2000     

Fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement

abstract – The release of fluoride from a glass ionomer cement (ASPA®) was. compared with that from a silicate cement. Test specimens were shaken in a solution with hydroxyapadte for 7 weeks. The solution was changed every week and the fluoride taken up by the hydroxyapatite measured. The specimens released considerably more fluoride during each of the first 2 weeks than during each of the subsequent 5 weeks. The continued release did not decrease very much with time. Slightly more fluoride was released from the glass ionomer cement than from the silicate.     

Short- and long-term fluoride release from glass ionomers and other fluoride-containing filling materials in vitro

Test specimens of seven different glass ionomer filling materials and one fissure sealant were exposed to running water for 2 yr. One amalgam and one composite, both containing fluoride, were included for comparison. The fluoride release from the specimens was measured periodically after storing the specimens for 24 h or 1 wk in a small amount of water. The fluoride release from the glass ionomers decreased with time and a constant level was reached for most products during the 2-yr period. The release was increased by lowering the pH of the storage solution. The release from the glass ionomers was clearly greater than from the amalgam and the composite.     

Effect of encapsulation on the fluoride release from conventional glass ionomers.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of the type of encapsulation and the batch on the fluoride release of conventionally setting glass ionomer cements Ketac-Fil and Fuji Cap II. METHODS: Three capsule types were selected: the capsules of Ketac-Fil and Fuji Cap II, and standard capsules. Six individual series of five cylindrical specimens were made from fresh mixes and leached at 37 degrees C with 25 ml distilled water up to 56 days. A second series of five specimens per formulation in original capsules was made from fresh mixes of another batch. The fluoride concentration was determined by means of a fluoride-ion selective electrode. RESULTS: The fluoride release profiles of a given glass ionomer formulation generally run parallel regardless of the type of encapsulation. When the amounts of fluoride released within the specific formulation were compared as a function of the capsule type, statistically significant differences were only found for Ketac-Fil. Comparing the amounts of fluoride released by different batches of a given glass ionomer formulation, statistically significant differences were only found for Fuji Cap II. SIGNIFICANCE: The type of encapsulation may affect the fluoride release of a given glass ionomer formulation quantitatively, but not qualitatively. Apparently, different batches of the same formulation may result in different amounts of fluoride released.     

Fluoride release from glass ionomer cement in vivo and in vitro

The aims of this study were to investigate in vivo the release of fluoride from three glass ionomer cements (GICs) Vitrebond, Ketac-Fil and ChemFil II into the saliva of preschool children for a 1-year period and also to study in vitro the release-absorption-release of fluoride from the same GICs for 16 weeks. In the first part of the study, glass ionomer restorations were placed in primary teeth in preschool children. Unstimulated saliva was collected and the fluoride in the saliva was measured before placement of the restorations, immediately after, after 3 weeks, after 6 weeks, and after 1 year. In the second part of the study, test specimens of GICs were placed in deionized water and the release of fluoride was measured weekly for 16 weeks. At week 12, samples were exposed to fluoride toothpaste. The concentration of fluoride in saliva was 0.04 ppm before placement of the restorations. After three weeks it had increased to 0.8 ppm and the level remained as high as 0.3 ppm even after 1 year. In the laboratory study the tested glass ionomer cements showed a capacity to absorb fluoride from the fluoride toothpaste and then release it. It is concluded that glass ionomer cement can act as a rechargeable slow release fluoride device.     

Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and influence on Streptococcus mutans growth

The aims of the present study were to measure the fluoride release of 1 glass ionomer cement, 1 cermet cement, 3 resin-modified glass ionomer cements and 1 compomer, and to determine the influence of each material on bacterial growth. Test specimens were eluted in saline for 180 days. Every 2 days, the specimens were transferred into fresh saline and the fluoride content of the solution was measured. Furthermore, 48-h, 14-d, 90-d, and 180-d eluates were inoculated with Streptococcus mutans and bacterial growth was recorded nephelometrically. Fluoride release dropped significantly over time for each material with values between 6.2 (Ketac-Silver) and 29.3 (Photac-Fil) ppm after 48 h to values between 0.6 (Ketac-Silver) and 1.7 (Ketac-Fil, Vitremer) ppm after 180 days. Each material reduced bacterial growth at each time of examination, but the effect decreased significantly over time with a maximum growth of 71.7% (Ketac-Fil) to 85.6% (Ketac-Silver) after 48 h and 94.7 (Vitremer) to 99.0% (Ketac-Silver) after 180 days (growth control = 100%). Both Ketac-Silver and Dyract showed a significantly lower inhibiting effect on bacterial growth than the other materials. The tested materials showed a good correlation between fluoride release and influence on bacterial growth. However, both effects dropped dramatically over the 180-days period.     

四种玻璃离子充填材料释氟性与溶解性的研究

目的 比较4种玻璃离子充填材料短期内氟离子释放能力和溶解性,为临床选择充填材料提供依据.方法 实验选取1种传统型玻璃离子水门汀(SC),2种高强度玻璃离子水门汀FujiⅨ(F9)和Ketac Moler(KM),1种树脂改良型玻璃离子水门汀FujiIILC (F2LC),和1种复合树脂Z100( CR,3M)共5种材...     

Fluoride release and uptake by aged resin-modified glass ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite

Little has been reported of the relationship of fluoride release and weight loss, and the effects of use of different fluoride agents on restorations, for the new generation of glass ionomer cements. The objectives of this study were to compare fluoride release of fresh and aged specimens of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract), and of three resin-modified glass ionomer cements (Fuji II LC, Photac-Fil, Vitremer); and to correlate fluoride release and weight loss of aged specimens after recharging with three different fluoride agents. All materials showed high initial fluoride release immediately after uptake when using the agents. However, the levels of fluoride release dropped rapidly soon afterwards. Although initial fluoride release was significantly different between Dyract and the three resin-modified glass ionomers, when different fluoride agents were used on aged specimens after recharging, no significant differences were found after the first few hours. Linear regression analyses also showed no correlation between cumulative fluoride release and weight loss. Possible beneficial oral health effects may only be expected by frequent exposure of these materials to fluoride agents.     

Ion uptake into demineralized dentine from glass ionomer cement following pretreatment with silver fluoride and potassium iodide

BACKGROUND: Diamine silver fluoride (Ag(NH3)2F), referred to as AgF, has been shown to provide a pronounced antimicrobial action against caries. The clinical application of this material has been limited by the staining associated with both teeth and tooth coloured restorative materials. The application of potassium iodide (KI) after AgF eliminates stain formation. The purpose of this study was to determine if a prior application of silver fluoride and potassium iodine to demineralized dentine affected the uptake of strontium and fluoride from a glass ionomer cement restoration. METHOD: Three cavities were prepared in each of five recently extracted human third molars. The cavities were demineralized and treated as follows. In each tooth, one cavity was left as a control, one cavity was restored with glass ionomer cement and one cavity was treated with 1.8M AgF and a saturated KI solution and then restored with glass ionomer cement. The penetration of the various elements into demineralized dentine was measured by their relative percentage weights using electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). RESULTS: Fluoride uptake was significantly higher in the AgF and KI treated samples compared to the other two samples and significantly higher in the glass ionomer restored sample compared to the control. The application of AgF and KI did not significantly interfere with the transfer of strontium from glass ionomer cement into dentine. Silver and iodine deposits were present in the demineralized dentine treated with AgF and KI. CONCLUSIONS: The application of AgF and KI onto dentine prior to the placement of glass ionomer cement did not significantly affect the strontium uptake into the subjacent demineralized dentine and the fluoride levels in this zone were significantly increased.     

In vitro fluoride release from aesthetic restorative materials following recharging with APF gel

In this in vitro study, the fluoride ion release from three more-viscous conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs)--ChemFlex, Fuji IX GP, Ionofil Molar--four polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers)--Dyract AP, Compoglass F, Freedom, F2000--and a hybrid resin composite--Ariston pHc--were compared. The amounts of fluoride release from 3 x 2.7 mm specimens were measured over six weeks using a fluoride ion-selective electrode. After six weeks, the specimens were recharged with 2 ml of 1.23 per cent acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel for four minutes. The recharged specimens were then assessed for the amounts of fluoride release over another six weeks. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way and repeated measures ANOVA. The GICs and Compoglass F showed significantly higher initial fluoride release rates during the first two days (p < 0.05). After the first two days, fluoride release rates from all materials dropped quickly and became essentially stabilized within three-five weeks, in an exponential mode. The recharging of the specimens with APF gel caused a brief, but significant, increase in fluoride release for all materials (p < 0.05), before decreasing to previous comparable rates. Compoglass F released relatively more fluoride, and Ariston pHc relatively less, after APF gel application than before. The lowest total amounts over the study were released by Dyract AP and Freedom. The newer compomers, as well as the newer more-viscous GICs, appear to act as fluoride reservoirs to varying extents.     

Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid

The amounts and the pattern of fluoride release from one metal-reinforced glass ionomer cement, two resin-modified glass ionomer cements, one compomer, and one composite resin placed in double-distilled water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid were evaluated in this study. Measurements of fluoride ion release were made for a total of 105 cylindrical specimens (10 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm in height). They were taken over a period of 16 weeks at the intervals of 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours, as well as 2, 3, 7, 14, 28, 56, and 112 days. The pattern of fluoride release was similar for all of the examined materials. The greatest amount of fluoride was released from the metal-reinforced glass ionomer Argion. The resin-modified glass ionomers Vitremer, Fuji II LC; the compomer Dyract; and the composite resin Tetric followed in ranking order. The pH of the environment strongly affected the fluoride release from the materials. There was a significant difference (P < 0.001) in the amounts of fluoride released in lactic acid vs water and artificial saliva, whereas, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the amounts of fluoride released in water vs artificial saliva.     

Fluoride release from and tensile bond strength of Ketac-fil and ketac-silver to enamel and dentin

Silver-reinforced glass ionomer cements have recently become commercially available. The purpose of this study was to determine the fluoride (F) release from, and the tensile bond strength (TBS) of Ketac-Fil, a conventional, and Ketac-Silver, a silver-reinforced glass ionomer cement, to enamel and dentin, respectively. To determine F release, 6 discs, 20 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm thick, were prepared from each material, and suspended in 50 ml glass distilled water for 24 h. The discs were washed with 50 ml TISAB and the fluoride concentrations determined electrometrically. These procedures were repeated for 14 consecutive days. The TBS of Ketac-Fil to enamel (A) and dentin (B) and of Ketac-Silver to enamel (C) and dentin (D), respectively, were determined. Fifteen test specimens were prepared with each procedure. The test specimens were stored in water at 37°C for 24 h. The test specimens were then mounted in an Instron machine and subjected to a tensile load at a cross-head speed of 0.02 inch. min⁻¹. The bond strengths were calculated and expressed in MN.m⁻². The data were analyzed by ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test at the 5% level of significance. Ketac-Fil only released significantly more F (μg F. mm−2 during the first 7 days than Ketac-Silver. The following tensile bond strengths (MN.m⁻²) were obtained: A: 2.3±1.6; B: 2.0 ±2.3; C: 1.2±1.7; D: 0.5±1.3. The bond strengths of D were significantly lower than those of A and B but not significantly different from C. The addition of silver to a glass ionomer cement reduced the fluoride release and the bond strength to dentin.     

Long-term fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement,a compomer,and from experimental resin composites

The aqueous phase of glass ionomer cements enables fluoride ions to diffuse and to be released from the material. The matrix of resin composites is much less hydrophilic, and fluoride incorporated in the material is only released in small amounts. It was the purpose of the present work to study the influence of resin matrix formulation on the fluoride release from experimental, fluoride-containing resin composites. The resin composites were based on methacrylate monomers and the adduct of maleic anhydride and HEMA (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). The resin composites contained 1 w% or 5 w% of AlF3*3H2O. A glass ionomer cement and a compomer were used as controls. Five disks of each material were stored in distilled water at room temperature. By means of a fluoride sensitive electrode, the fluoride release from disk-shaped specimens was determined periodically over 3 years. The glass ionomer cement released the most fluoride (1.54 +/- 4 microg/cm2 after 1 year and 248 +/- 7 microg/cm2 after 3 years). The compomer released relatively little fluoride during the 1st year (30 +/- 1 microg/cm2) but after this time the rate of fluoride release became equal to that of the glass ionomer cement, resulting in a release of 122 +/- 8 microg/cm2 after 3 years. Regarding the resin composites, the fluoride release increased with the hydrophilicity and the acid character of the polymer matrix. The release, however, was significantly lower than that from the glass ionomer cement and the compomer and ranged from 1.2 +/- 0.07 to 42 +/- 3.9 microg/cm2 at 1 year and from 2.3 +/- 0.16 to 79 +/- 6 microg/cm2 at 3 years.     

Surface roughness and weight loss of esthetic restorative materials related to fluoride release and uptake.

The objective of this study was to assess the surface roughness of eight esthetic restorative materials and the relationship with weight changes during fluoride release and uptake. Five specimens each of ChemFil Superior, Fuji IX Dyract, Fuji II LC, Vitremer, Photac-Fil, Ketac-Silver, and Z100 (control) were prepared and immersed in 2 ml of artificial saliva at 37 degrees C. The changes in specimen weight and fluoride release were monitored for 12 weeks. This protocol was repeated after recharging the specimens with 1.23% APF gel for 12 more weeks. The immersed and fresh specimens for each material were then examined with SEM and surface profilometry. There was a significant weight loss for all glass ionomer cements following APF gel application (P < 0.01), which correlated with fluoride release (r = 0.89-0.98). Mean roughness (Ra) measurements and SEM showed that roughness increased from the resin composite to the conventional glass ionomer cements. The marked erosive effect of APF gel on glass ionomer restorations could increase surface colonization by plaque micro-organisms, and reduce the longevity of the restorations.