Laparoscopic repair of incarcerated paraesophageal hernias

Paraesophageal hernias comprise only 2–5% of all hiatal hernias, yet unlike the more common sliding hiatal hernia, paraesophageal hernias are prone to undergo volvulus, with obstruction, ischemia, and gangrenous perforation. Due to their propensity toward calamitous complications, they must be recognized and repaired as expeditiously as possible. Traditionally these hernias have been repaired by either an open transabdominal or an open transthoracic approach. Laparoscopic repair with Nissen fundoplication has already been successfully applied to the repair of the more common sliding hiatal hernia. Described here is the laparoscopic repair of two paraesophageal hernias. The merit of an anti-reflux procedure as part of this repair is discussed.     

Laparoscopic repair of esophageal hiatal hernia

Hiatal hernias are usually classified into three distinct types: type I, sliding hernia; type II, paraesophageal hernia; and type III, a combination of type I and II hernias. Presentation of type I hernia is so-called reflux symptoms, in contrast with the symptoms associated with mechanical obstruction of the herniated stomach in type II and III hernias. Surgical indications for type I hernia depend upon the severity of esophagitis. In type II and III hernias, severe symptoms and complications represent the chief indications for repair. Totally intrathoracic stomach hernias generally present such a risk of volvulus, strangulation, and perforation that surgery is indicated even in asymptomatic and uncomplicated cases. Although the pathophysiology is different, the Nissen procedure is the surgical procedure of choice for both types of hiatal hernia. Since the first report in 1993, the laparoscopic Nissen procedure has gained wide acceptance. We have so far experienced 26 cases of hiatal hernia, 18 of type I and 8 of type II and III hernias. We used the laparoscopic Nissen procedure in all cases. There were no conversions to the open procedure. Hiatal hernia recurred only in one case with a short esophagus preoperatively. The laparoscopic Nissen procedure is here to stay for the repair of hiatal hernias regardless of their type.     

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias

The advent of minimally invasive techniques has brought about a shift in the operative approach of patients with paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Today, the laparoscopic repair of a paraesophageal hiatal hernia has almost completely replaced the open approach through either a laparotomy or a left thoracotomy. The laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias is a technically challenging operation; however, it is technically feasible and safe, and it is associated with a positive relief of symptoms, decreased postoperative pain, and a rapid return to normal activities (1, 2). This paper describes, step by step, our approach to the laparoscopic repair of a paraesophageal hiatal hernia.     

Simultaneous laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and sleeve gastrectomy in the morbidly obese

BackgroundMorbid obesity is associated with increased rates of hiatal and paraesophageal hernias. Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is gaining popularity as the procedure of choice for morbid obesity, there is little data regarding the management of paraesophageal hernias found intraoperatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of a combined sleeve gastrectomy and paraesophageal hernia repair in morbidly obese patients.MethodsFrom May 2011 to February 2013, 23 patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with the repair of a paraesophageal hernia. Only 4 patients had a large hiatal hernia documented preoperatively on esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The body mass index (BMI), operative time, length of stay, and complications were evaluated.ResultsThe average operative time was 165 minutes (115–240 minutes) and length of stay was 2.83 days (2–6 days). All patients were female except for one, with an average age of 53.4 years and a BMI of 41.9 kg/m². There were no complications during the procedures. Mean follow-up was 6.16 months (1–19 months), and mean excess weight loss was 39%. The average cost of admission for a combined procedure ($10,056), was slightly higher than a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ($8905) or laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair ($8954) done separately.ConclusionsLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with a paraesophageal hernia repair is well-tolerated and feasible in morbidly obese patients. Surgeons should be aware that preoperative EGD is not effective at diagnosing large hiatal or paraesophageal hernias. Surgeons with the skill set to repair paraesophageal hernias should do a combined procedure because it is well-tolerated, feasible, and can reduce the cost of multiple hospital admissions.     

Controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair; a review of literature

Background The surgical repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias (PHH) can be performed by endoscopic means, but the procedure is not standardized and results have not been evaluated systematically so far. The aim of this review article was to clarify controversial subjects on the surgical approach and technique, i.e., recurrence rate after conventional versus laparoscopic PHH treatment, results of mesh reinforcement of the cruroplasty, the necessity for additional antireflux surgery, and indications for an esophageal lengthening procedure. Methods An electronic Medline search was performed to identify all publications reporting on laparoscopic and conventional PHH surgery. The computer search was followed by additional hand searches in books, journals, and related articles. All types of publications were evaluated because of a lack of high-level evidence studies such as randomized controlled trials. Critical analysis followed for all articles describing a study population of >10 patients and those reporting postoperative outcome. Results A total of 32 publications were reviewed. Randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open techniques could not be identified. Nineteen of the publications described the results of retrospective series. Therefore, most of the studies retrieved were low in hierarchy of evidence (level II-c or lower). The overall median hospital time as published was 3 days for patients operated laparoscopically and 10 days in the conventional group. Postoperative complications, such as pneumonia, thrombosis, hemorrhage, and urinary and wound tract infections, appeared to be more frequent after conventional surgery. Follow-up was longer for conventional surgery (median 45 months versus 17.5 months after the laparoscopic technique). Recurrence rates reported were higher in patients operated conventionally (median 9.1% versus 7.0% for patients operated laparoscopically). Recurrences after PHH repair may decrease with usage of mesh in the hiatus, although uniform criteria for this procedure are lacking. No conclusions could be drawn regarding the necessity for an additional antireflux procedure. Furthermore, uniform specific indications for the need of an esophageal lengthening procedure or preoperative assessment methods for shortened esophagus could not be detected. Conclusion Treatment based on standardized protocols for preoperative assessment and postoperative follow-up is required to clarify the current controversies.     

Treatment of giant paraesophageal hernia: pro laparoscopic approach

Purpose

Giant paraesophageal hernias (GPEH) are relatively uncommon and account for less than 5% of all primary hiatal hernias. Giant Secondary GPEH can be observed after surgery involving hiatal orifice opening, such as esophagectomy, antireflux surgery, and hiatal hernia repair. Surgical treatment is challenging, and there are still residual controversies regarding the laparoscopic approach, even though a reduced morbidity and mortality, as well as a shorter hospital stay have been demonstrated.

Methods

A Pubmed electronic search of the literature including articles published between 1992 and 2016 was conducted using the following key words: hiatal hernia, paraesophageal hernias, mesh, laparoscopy, intrathoracic stomach, gastric volvulus, diaphragmatic hernia.

Results

Given the risks of non-operative management, GPEH surgical repair is indicated in symptomatic patients. Technical steps for primary hernia repair include hernia reduction and sac excision, correct repositioning of the gastroesophageal junction, crural repair, and fundoplication. For secondary hernias, the surgical technique varies according to hernia type and components and according to the approach used during the first surgery. There is an ongoing debate regarding the best and safest method to close the hiatal orifice. The laparoscopic approach has demonstrated a lower postoperative morbidity and mortality, and a shorter hospital stay as compared to the open approach. A high recurrence rate has been reported for primary GPEH repair. However, recent studies suggest that recurrence does not reduce symptomatic outcomes.

Conclusions

The laparoscopic treatment of primary and secondary GPEH is safe and feasible in elective and emergency settings, especially in high-volume centers. The procedure is still challenging. The main steps are well defined. However, there is still room for improvement to lower the recurrence rate.

     

Giant paraesophageal hernia repair: Technical pearls

The optimal operative management of giant paraesophageal hiatal hernias continues to evolve, with recent series reporting promising results with minimally invasive approaches. The laparoscopic repair of a giant paraesophageal hernia is one of the more challenging cases a minimally invasive surgeon may perform. Our technical approach to this procedure involves a consistent emphasis on several key operative points: circumferential sac dissection with maintenance of crural integrity; extensive mediastinal esophageal dissection; crural closure with pledgeted sutures; wedge Collis gastroplasty for shortened esophagus; 3-stitch fundoplication incorporating esophageal tissue with each bite; additional sutures securing the top of the fundoplication to the crura; and biologic mesh buttressing. We believe that diligence paid toward these key steps permits laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair to be performed with similar outcomes as the open approach while avoiding the morbidity of thoracotomy or laparotomy.     

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair

The term paraesophageal hernia is described as a herniation of the gastric fundus through the open hiatus into the thoracic cavity while the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) remains in its normal anatomic position. This is considered a rolling esophageal hernia (Type II), and it is the least commonly encountered hiatal hernia. A more commonly encountered herniation of the fundus of the stomach is the Type III hernia, in which both the LES and the fundus herniate into the chest. This has also been classified as a paraesophageal hernia. The most common hiatal hernia is a sliding hiatal hernia (Type I), which consists of herniation of the stomach through the esophageal hiatus, causing the LES and gastric cardia to lie in the thoracic cavity. There are several controversial issues involved in paraesophageal hernia repair, including indications for surgery, the most appropriate surgical approach, and the need for a concomitant antireflux procedure. The increasing popularity of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair has dramatically altered the approach to these patients and has allowed patients at higher risk to better tolerate this procedure with a decrease in morbidity and mortality. However, they remain difficult surgical procedures.     

Laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia with teres ligament: midterm follow-up

Background Although laparoscopic repair of large, mostly paraesophageal hiatal hernias is widely applied, there is a great concern regarding the higher recurrence rate associated with this procedure. In order to reduce this high recurrence rate, several techniques have been developed, mostly applying a mesh prosthesis for hiatal reinforcement. Methods We have recently introduced a new laparoscopic technique in which the hiatal closure is reinforced with the teres ligament. To date 26 patients have been entered into this ongoing prospective study. After the operation patients were called back on a regular basis for symptom evaluation and barium swallow. All 26 patients agreed to undergo barium swallow, with a mean follow-up of 35 months. Results The mean operative time was 115 min. Perioperative morbidity was 11.5%, and conversion to an open procedure was performed in six cases. No mortality was registered. Anatomic recurrence, investigated by barium swallows was observed in four patients (15.3%). Of those four, only one (3.85%) had a symptomatic recurrent paraesophageal hernia; the other three had asymptomtic sliding hernias. In three of the four patients with anatomic recurrence, the diameter of the hiatal hernia was greater than 9 cm at the original operation, and the fourth patient underwent reoperation for recurrent hiatal hernia. No symptomatic recurrence was found in patients with diameter of hiatal hernia between 6 and 9 cm. Conclusions Laparoscopic reinforcement of the hiatal closure with the ligamentum teres is safe and effective treatment for large hiatal hernias. However, it appears that patients with extremely large hiatal hernias are at greater risk of recurrence, and therefore large hernias are not suitable for this new technique.     

Laparoscopic management of giant paraesophageal herniation

BACKGROUND: Many surgeons have found laparoscopic fundoplication effective management of medically recalcitrant gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) associated with sliding type I hiatal hernias. The anatomic distortion and technical difficulty inherent with repair has limited the use of laparoscopy for repair of "giant" paraesophageal hernias (gPH). METHODS: Since July 1993, we have accomplished laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias in 54 of 60 (90%) patients. Five patients had classic type II hernias with total intrathoracic stomachs, and 53 patients had large sliding/paraesophageal type III herniation. Two patients had true parahiatal hernias. None had gastric incarceration. Median age was 53 years and 28 of 60 (47%) were women. Chest pain and dysphagia were primary complaints from 39 of 60 (65%). Heartburn with or without regurgitation was present in 52 of 60 (85%). Preoperative manometry and prolonged pH testing were obtained on 43 of 60 (72%) and 44 of 60 (73%) patients, respectively. Principles of repair included reduction of the hernia, excision of the sac, crural approximation, and fundoplication over a 54F bougie (Nissen, 41; Dor, 1; Toupet, 18) to "pexy" the stomach within the abdomen and to control postoperative reflux. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 202+/-81 minutes. Conversion to "open" repair was required in 6 patients (iatrogenic esophageal injury in 2 patients and difficult hernia sac dissection in 4 patients). One postoperative mortality occurred as a result of sepsis and multiorgan failure after an intraoperative esophageal perforation. Follow-up barium swallow performed in 44 of 60 patients demonstrated recurrent hiatal hernias in 3 patients. Preoperative symptoms have been relieved in all but 3 patients. Reoperation for recurrent paraesophageal herniation has been required in these latter 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although technically challenging, laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias is a viable alternative to "open" surgical approaches. Control of the herniation and the patient's symptoms are equivalent and hospitalization and return to full activity are shorter.     

Laparoscopic treatment of paraesophageal and mixed diaphragmatic hernias. Report of two cases

Hiatal hernias are classified into 3 types: sliding hernia (type I), paraesophageal hernia (type II) and mixed hernia (type III), that is a combination of type I and II. The paraesophageal and mixed hernias represent about 5-10% of the surgically treated hiatal hernias. The surgical treatment of the paraesophageal and mixed hernias is unavoidable because of the high risk of severe complications and it has to be considered in a high percentage of cases. The most important technical difficulty in the video-laparoscopic treatment is represented by the hugeness of the hernial defect and by the challenging reduction of the stomach into the abdomen. A cautious dissection of hernial sac and diaphragmatic cruses as well as a careful crural repair make the video-laparoscopic procedure feasible. The operative times are not prolonged and the results are similar to the open technique ones. In literature, the incidence of both intra and postoperative complications doesn't exhibit statistically significant differences between laparoscopic and open techniques. Because of the complexity of the laparoscopic procedure, the minimally invasive access has to be reserved to surgeons who are well trained in those techniques. In this paper we describe 2 cases: one of paraesophageal hernia and the other of mixed hernia which were video-laparoscopically treated with the help, in the second case, of a Gore-Tex mesh. In both cases the technical results were positive. Intra and postoperative complications didn't occur and, one year after the surgical procedure, both patients were in good health and recurrence-free.     

Surgical repair of type II paraesophageal hernia: our experience

Type II paraesophageal hiatal hernia is a rare entity that is rarely discussed in the literature. This report is intended to depict the clinical profile of the disease and to discuss several controversial issues involved in the repair, including indications for surgery, the most appropriate surgical approach, and the need for a concomitant antireflux procedure. This study retrospectively reviews the experience with 12 patients affected by paraesophageal hernia who underwent a surgical repair between 1973 and 2001. Ten were women and two were men, with a mean age of 56.8 years. Clinical features and diagnostic assessment, as well as operative findings, are presented. Nine patients underwent an elective operation, and three patients underwent an emergency procedure for hernia complications. A thoracic approach was used in one patient, whereas the remaining 11 patients underwent an abdominal repair; the hernia sac was resected, and the hiatus was reconstructed in all of the patients. No postoperative deaths occurred; complications occurred in one patient, and only one recurrence was observed. Type II paraesophageal hernia seems to be a rare primary diaphragmatic defect. Its surgical repair is mandatory, because paraesophageal hernia is a potentially life-threatening disease because of the risk of severe complications; an elective repair should be performed wherever possible, even in asymptomatic patients. The main problems of the management are the choice of the surgical approach and the usefulness of an associated antireflux procedure to the hiatoplasty; in our opinion, a fundoplication should be added to all repairs.     

Anterior gastropexy may reduce the recurrence rate after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair

Background: Although laparoscopic repair of type 3 paraesophageal hernias is safe and results in symptomatic relief, recent data have questioned the anatomic integrity of the laparoscopic approach. The reports document an asymptomatic recurrence rate as high as 42% with radiologic follow-up evaluation for type 3 paraesophageal hernias repaired laparoscopically. This disturbingly high recurrence rate has prompted the addition of an anterior gastropexy to our standard laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Methods: A prospective series of 28 patients underwent laparoscopic repair of large type 3 hiatal hernias between July 2000 and January 2002 at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation by one surgeon. All the patients underwent reduction of the hernia, sac excision, crural repair, antireflux procedure, and anterior gastropexy. They all had a video esophagram 24 h after surgery, then at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits and annually thereafter. Symptomatic outcomes were assessed with a standard questionnaire at each follow-up visit. Results: In this study, 21 women and 7 men with a mean age of 67 years (range, 35–82 years) underwent successful laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. The mean operative time was 146 min (range, 101–186 min), and the average blood loss was 71 ml (range, 10–200 ml). One intraoperative complication occurred: A small esophageal mucosal tear occurred during esophageal dissection and was repaired laparoscopically. At 24 h, upper gastrointestinal examination identified no leaks. At this writing, all the patients have undergone video esophagram at a 3-month follow-up visit. All were asymptomatic and all examinations were normal. Of the 28 patients, 27 have undergone follow-up assessment at 6 months. At this writing, all the patients have undergone video esophagram at 3, 6, and 12 months follow up visits. All were asymptomatic and all examinations were normal. Ten patients have completed 2 year follow up barium swallows with no recurrences. Conclusions: With up to 2 years of follow-up evaluation, the addition of an anterior gastropexy to the laparoscopic repair of type 3 hiatal hernias resulted in no recurrences. These encouraging results necessitate further follow-up evaluation to document the long-term effects of anterior gastropexy in reducing postoperative recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias.     

"True" parahiatal hernia: a rare entity radiologic presentation and clinical management

BACKGROUND: True parahiatal diaphragmatic hernias are rare entities that are sparsely accounted for in the literature. The current report is intended to depict the clinical profile and assess the feasibility of laparoscopic repair of parahiatal hernias. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients diagnosed and treated for parahiatal hernias. Clinical presentation and radiological assessment, as well as operative findings and repair, are discussed. RESULTS: Of the 917 laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs, 2 (0.2%) patients were identified with a parahiatal hernia. The presenting symptoms and preoperative testing were similar to those with more common paraesophageal hernias. Laparoscopic repair was successful in repairing the diaphragmatic defect and alleviating symptoms up to 4 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Parahiatal hernias of the diaphragm appear to be rare primary diaphragmatic defects. The clinical presentation of parahiatal hernias is often indistinguishable from the more common paraesophageal pathology. Laparoscopic repair of this rare entity can be safely and successfully accomplished in conjunction with antireflux surgical interventions when indicated.     

Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze our initial results after laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias. METHODS: Between October 1997 and May 2000, 37 patients (23 women, 14 men) underwent laparoscopic repair of a large type II (pure paraesophageal) or type III (combined sliding and paraesophageal) hiatal hernia with more than 50% of the stomach herniated into the chest. Median age was 72 years (range 52 to 92 years). Data related to patient demographics, esophageal function, operative techniques, postoperative symptomatology, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Laparoscopic hernia repair and Nissen fundoplication was possible in 35 of 37 patients (95.0%). Median hospitalization was 4 days (range 2 to 20 days). Intraoperative complications occurred in 6 patients (16.2%) and included pneumothorax in 3 patients, splenic injury in 2, and crural tear in 1. Early postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients (13.5%) and included esophageal leak in 2, severe bloating in 2, and a small bowel obstruction in 1. Two patients died within 30 days (5.4%), 1 from delayed splenic bleeding and 1 from adult respiratory distress syndrome secondary to a recurrent strangulated hiatal hernia. Follow-up was complete in 31 patients (94.0%) and ranged from 3 to 34 months (median 15 months). Twenty-seven patients (87.1%) were improved. Four patients (12.9%) required early postoperative dilatation. Recurrent paraesophageal hiatal hernia occurred in 4 patients (12.9%). Functional results were classified as excellent in 17 patients (54.9%), good in 9 (29.0%), fair in 1 (3.2%), and poor in 4 (12.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias is a challenging operation associated with significant morbidity and mortality. More experience, longer follow-up, and further refinement of the operative technique is indicated before it can be recommended as the standard approach.     

Additional mechanisms of hiatal hernia recurrence and its prevention

Summary The conventional hiatal hernia repair is a tension repair. Large defects such as those associated with an intrathoracic stomach can have a high rate of recurrence resulting in esophageal symptoms and in some instances gastric strangulation. Numerous additive procedures are used to secure the stomach in the abdominal cavity including mesh buttressing, fundoplication, anterior abdominal wall gastropexy and fundus diaphragmatic suture fixation. The optimal repair is unknown primarily because crura closure failure is poorly understood. A literature review was used to determine the proven causes of hiatal hernia recurrence. Early postoperative vomiting, surgeon inexperience, short esophagus and no crus closure are documented causes. In a series of 19 hiatal hernia recurrence repairs from our institution, additional causes such as suture pull-out and trauma have been established as additional mechanisms of recurrence. Increased intra-abdominal pressure associated with motor vehicle accidents was the precipitating factor in 2/19 patients. Suggested methods for prevention of hiatal disruption and resultant hernia are proposed which include: a postoperative antiemetic regimen, restricted activity in the early postoperative period, an assessment technique for the short esophagus when utilizing a laparoscopic approach, crus closure calibration and inclusion of the diaphragmatic fascia when performing hiatal closure for large paraesophageal hernias and the short esophagus.     

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, a challenging operation: Medium-term outcome of 116 patients

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs performed in 116 patients between 1992 and 2001 were pro-spectively analyzed. Perioperative outcomes were assessed and follow-up was performed under protocol. There were 85 female and 31 male patients who had a mean (± SD)ageof65 ± 13 years and an American Society of Anesthesiology score of 2.3 ± 0.6. All but two patients underwent an antireflux procedure. Gastropexy was performed in 48 patients, an esophageal lengthening procedure in six patients, and prosthetic closure of the hiatus in six patients. Major complications occurred in five patients (4.3%) with two postoperative deaths (1.7%). Mean follow-up was 30 ± 25 months; 96 patients (83%) have been followed for more than 6 months. Among these patients, 73 (76%) are asymptomatic, 11 (11%) have mild symptoms, and 12 (13%) take antacid medications. Protocol barium esophagograms were obtained in 69% of patients at 6 to 12 months’ follow-up. Recurrence of hiatal hernia was documented in 21 patients (22% overall and in 32% of those undergoing contrast studies). Reoperation has been performed in three patients (3 %). When only the patients with recurrent hiatal hernias are considered, 13 (62 %) are symptomatic but only six (28%) require medication for symptoms. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair is generally safe, even in this high-risk group. This study confirms a relatively high incidence of recurrent hiatal abnormalities after paraesophageal hernia repair; however, most recurrent hiatal hernias are small and only 3% have required reoperation. Protocol esophagograms detect recurrences that are minimally symptomatic. Improved techniques must be devised to improve the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Presented at the Forty-Third Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, San Francisco, California, May 19–22, 2002 (oral presentation). Supported by the Washington University Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery.     

Improvement results in paraesophageal hernia

Paraesophageal hernias account for between 5 and 14% of hiatal hernias. Surgical management is complex and is currently one of the most debated subjects in surgery. Every symptomatic patient with a paraesophageal hernia and no contraindication for surgery should undergo repair. It is important to perform an evaluation that includes medical history, chest x-rays, barium swallow, upper endoscopy and manometry. Surgical approaches include open thoracic and abdominal access. Recently, laparoscopic surgery has become an option with less morbidity and mortality with results similar to open surgery. Essential technical aspects to improve results are reduction of the hernia sac, recognition and management of the short esophagus, hiatal closure and an antireflux procedure. Despite improving recurrence rates, use of synthetic mesh for hiatal closure has been associated with catastrophic complications; therefore, use of biologic mesh is preferred.     

Laparoscopic treatment of large hiatal hernias

Large hiatal or paraesophageal hernias constitute between 5% and 10% of all hiatal hernias. This hernia is a potential threatening complication, and a timely operative correction should be performed in all patients with an acceptable risk. Based on the lessons learned from conventional approach, laparoscopic treatment has confirmed the initial good results with all advantages of laparoscopic surgery. Reduction of the hernia, excision of the sac, and approximation of the hiatus followed by selective use of an antireflux procedure and some form of gastropexy constitute the operative steps to obtain optimal postoperative results.     

Is a barium swallow complementary to endoscopy essential in the preoperative assessment of laparoscopic antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery?

Background Barium swallow is considered essential in the preoperative assessment of gastroesophaeal reflux disease and hiatal hernias. The objective of this study was to investigate the effective value of a barium swallow if complementary to the commonly recommended endoscopy before laparoscopic antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery. Methods We prospectively evaluated 40 consecutive patients who were tested with preoperative barium swallow and endoscopy before laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or symptomatic hiatal hernia. Results regarding the presence and the type of hiatal hernia found by barium swallow and endoscopy were correlated with the intraoperative finding as the reference standard. Results Intraoperative findings revealed 21 axial, 7 paraesophageal, and 12 mixed hiatal hernias. Barium swallow and endoscopy allowed the diagnosis of hiatal hernia in 75% and 97.5%, respectively (p = 0.003). The correct classification of hiatal hernia was confirmed in 50% by barium swallow and 80% by endoscopy (p = 0.005). Conclusions Although barium swallow is recommended as an important diagnostic tool in the workup before surgical antireflux and hiatal hernia therapy, our results suggest that if mandatory endoscopy is performed preoperatively, a barium swallow does not provide any further essential information. It seems that barium swallow can be omitted as a basic diagnostic test before primary laparoscopic antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery.