Splenic artery aneurysms: postembolization syndrome and surgical complications

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the endovascular embolization of splenic artery aneurysms and false aneurysms with special consideration given to postoperative complications. METHODS: Fifteen patients (11 women; mean age, 56 y; range, 39-80 y) with splenic artery aneurysm (n = 13) or false aneurysm (n = 2) were treated with coil embolization. The lesion was asymptomatic in 9 patients, symptomatic in 5 patients, and ruptured in 1 patient. The mean aneurysm diameter was 33 +/- 23 mm (range, 15-80 mm). Postoperative follow-up evaluation included a clinical visit and spiral computed tomography at 1, 4, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Endovascular treatment was possible in 14 patients (93%) (1 failure: neck cannulation). Perioperative mortality was not observed. Morbidity included postembolization syndrome in 5 patients (30%). Neither pancreatitis nor spleen abscess occurred. The mean follow-up period was 36 months (range, 3-60 mo). During follow-up evaluation we detected 1 sac reperfusion that was sealed successfully with additional coils. Surgical conversion or open repair were never required. CONCLUSIONS: At our institute, endovascular treatment represents the first-line treatment for splenic artery aneurysms. Postembolization syndrome and infarcts are common events but generally resolve without sequelae.     

Transcatheter arterial embolization of splenic artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms: short- and long-term results

We evaluated outcomes of endovascular treatment of splenic artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. From April 2002 to May 2007, 17 patients (mean age 55.2 years, range 17-82) with splenic artery aneurysms (n = 7) or pseudoaneurysms (n = 10) underwent endovascular treatment. Six patients were asymptomatic, three had symptomatic nonruptured aneurysms, and eight had ruptured aneurysms. Lesions were in the proximal splenic artery (n = 5), intermediate splenic artery (n = 3), splenic hilum (n = 6), or parenchyma (n = 3). Embolization was with microcoils by sac packing (n = 8), sandwich occlusion of the main splenic artery (n = 4), or cyanoacrylate glue into the feeding artery (n = 4). Computed angiotomography was done within the first month and magnetic resonance angiography after 6 and 12 months, then yearly. Mean follow-up was 29 months (range 1-62). Exclusion of the aneurysm was achieved in 16 (94.1%) patients. One patient with an intraparenchymal pseudoaneurysm underwent splenectomy after failed distal catheterization. No major complications occurred. Postembolization syndrome developed in four patients, who had radiographic evidence of splenic microinfarcts. Transcatheter embolization of splenic artery aneurysms/pseudoaneurysms is safe and effective and may induce less morbidity than open surgery, in particular by preserving the spleen. Coil artifacts may make magnetic resonance angiography preferable over computed tomography for follow-up.     

Endovascular treatment of very small intracranial aneurysms

BACKGROUND: The treatment of very small cerebral aneurysms with maximal diameter less than 3 mm remains a challenge for endovascular and surgical treatment. Endovascular treatment of these lesions may be difficult and associated with high risk of complications because of their small size. Our purpose was to assess the feasibility and results of endovascular treatment of these lesions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of our experience and results of endovascular treatments for a series of 11 consecutive patients with 11 very small aneurysms. Of 11 aneurysms, 10 were acutely ruptured, and 1 was unruptured with a previous subarachnoid hemorrhage from another aneurysm. Aneurysms were located at the internal carotid artery (n = 4), the anterior communicating artery (n = 6), and the vertebral artery (n = 1). Seven patients were treated with coil embolization, and remodeling technique was used in 1 case. Three cases underwent intravascular stent implantation. Coil packing was done after in 2 of 3 aneurysms, and stent implantation alone was used in the remaining aneurysm. RESULTS: Coil embolization and stent deployment were carried out without difficulty in all cases. Coil packing was not available after stent implantation in 1 case for unsuccessful navigation of microcatheter into the aneurysm sac. Immediate angiography demonstrated complete occlusion in 10 cases and nearly complete occlusion in 1 case with stent implantation alone. No stent thrombosis and aneurysmal rupture was encountered during treatment. With the exception of 1 patient (Hunt and Hess grade 4) who died of pneumonia 4 weeks after treatment, no clinical evidence of neurologic deterioration and hemorrhagic complication was seen during the follow-up period in the remaining 10 patients. Follow-up angiography for 3 to 12 months (mean, 5.3 months) was available in 6 (60%) of 10 surviving patients, and no aneurysm recanalization was found. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment may be a feasible and effective therapeutic alternative for very small aneurysms. The long-term efficacy and durability of endovascular treatment for these lesions remains to be determined in a large series.     

Management of huge splenic artery aneurysm with new hybrid procedure including endovascular and open surgical approach: Case series

IntroductionSplenic artery aneurysms (SAAs) account for more than half of all visceral artery aneurysms. Small SAAs are usually asymptomatic, but giant aneurysms are more likely to cause symptoms and result in life-threatening complications; these aneurysms treatment can be challenging. Splenic artery aneurysms treatment includes laparotomy, laparoscopy, or endovascular techniques.Case presentationThis case series reports the details of successful management of three patients with huge splenic artery aneurysms who underwent hybrid surgery, endovascular inflow control with a balloon, and open aneurysm resection.DiscussionAlthough endovascular treatment options are increasingly favored, only selected aneurysms are suitable for these procedures, as marked tortuosity of the artery or SAA in the proximal splenic artery may not be suitable for endovascular management.ConclusionOpen surgery escorted by endovascular techniques can be considered an ideal treatment of SAA in the proximal region of the splenic artery.     

The endovascular management of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms

OBJECTIVE: Visceral artery aneurysms may be treated by aneurysm exclusion, excision, revascularization, and endovascular techniques. The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of the management of visceral artery aneurysms with catheter-based techniques. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2005, 90 patients were identified with a diagnosis of visceral artery aneurysm. This was inclusive of aneurysmal disease of the celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery (SMA), inferior mesenteric artery, and their branches. Surveillance without intervention occurred in 23 patients, and 19 patients underwent open aneurysm repair (4 ruptures). The endovascular treatment of 48 consecutive patients (mean age 58, 60% men) with 20 visceral artery aneurysms (VAA) and 28 visceral artery pseudoaneurysms (VAPA) was the basis for this study. Electronic and hardcopy medical records were reviewed for demographic data and clinical variables. Original computed tomography (CT) scans and fluoroscopic imaging were evaluated. RESULTS: The endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms was technically successful in 98% of 48 procedures, consisting of 3 celiac axis repairs, 2 left gastric arteries, 1 SMA, 12 hepatic arteries, 20 splenic arteries, 7 gastroduodenal arteries, 1 middle colic artery, and 2 pancreaticoduodenal arteries. Of these, 29 (60%) were performed for symptomatic disease (5 ruptured aneurysms). Procedures were performed in the endovascular suite under local anesthesia with conscious sedation (94%). The femoral artery was used as the preferential access site (90%). Coil embolization was used for aneurysm exclusion in 96%. N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (glue) was used selectively (19%) using a triaxial system with a 3F microcatheter for persistent flow or multiple branches. The 30-day mortality was 8.3% (n = 4). One patient died from recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding after gastroduodenal embolization, and the remaining died of unrelated causes. All perioperative deaths occurred in patients requiring urgent or emergent intervention in the setting of hemodynamic instability. No patients undergoing elective intervention died in the periprocedural period. Postprocedural imaging was performed after 77% of interventions at a mean of 16 months. Complete exclusion of flow within the aneurysm sac occurred in 97% interventions with follow-up imaging, but coil and glue artifact complicated CT evaluation. Postembolization syndrome developed in three patients (6%) after splenic artery embolization. There was no evidence of hepatic insufficiency or bowel ischemia after either hepatic or mesenteric artery aneurysm treatment. Three patients required secondary interventions for persistent flow (n = 1) and recurrent bleeding from previously embolized aneurysms (n = 2). CONCLUSION: Visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms can be successfully treated with endovascular means with low periprocedural morbidity; however, the urgent repair of these lesions is still associated with elevated mortality rates. Aneurysm exclusion can be accomplished with coil embolization and the selective use of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. Current catheter-based techniques extend our ability to exclude visceral artery aneurysms, but imaging artifact hampers postoperative CT surveillance.     

����Ƣ������ǻ������15������

??Endovascular treatment experience of aberrant splenic artery aneurysms: A study of 15 cases FANG Gang??CHEN Bin??FU Wei-guo??et al. Department of Vascular Surgery??Zhongshan Hospital??Fudan University??Shanghai 200032??China
Corresponding author??DONG Zhi-hui??E-mail: dzh926@126.com
Abstract Objective To summarize the endovascular treatment experience of aberrant splenic artery aneurysms. Methods The clinical data of 15 aberrant splenic artery aneurysms including 5 type A and 10 type B aneurysms treated by endovascular repair in Zhongshan Hospital??Fudan University from April 2007 to April 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. Results Technical success was achieved in 14 of 15 patients with angiographic documentation of aneurysmal exclusion. Endovascular treatment was abandoned after considering the high risk of coil embolization into the superior mesenteric artery and the relatively small aneurysm size in one patient. Treatment strategies of aberrant splenic artery aneurysms included coil embolization of the sac and outflow artery??with or without embolization of the inflow artery??or covered stent placement in the superior mesenteric artery. Follow-up time ranged from 2 to 117 months. No hepatic or intestinal ischemia??or death developed perioperatively or during the follow-up period. Reintervention was needed in 1 patient for persistent sac enlargement. The covered stent was found asymptomatically occluded in 1 patient at 2 years because of abundant collateral perfusion of the Riolan’s arch. Conclusion Endovascular treatment appeared to be feasible??safe??and effective in the management of aberrant splenic artery aneurysms. Furthermore??the preservation of the superior mesenteric artery??should be emphasized when optimizing aneurysmal exclusion.     

Splenic artery aneurysms: methods of laparoscopic repair.

PURPOSE: Surgical therapy for splenic artery aneurysms (SAAs) has traditionally consisted of a laparotomy with resection of the aneurysm and possibly a splenectomy. Our early experience with the laparoscopic approach to treat SAAs is reported. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted on all patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of SAAs at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation from May 1996 to August 1997. RESULTS: Four patients with SAAs, three women and one man, with an average age of 55 years (range, 37 to 63 years), underwent successful laparoscopic SAA repair. The average size of the aneurysm was 3.2 cm (range, 2.5 to 5.0 cm). Three patients underwent an aneurysm resection, whereas one patient underwent simple ligation. Intraoperative ultrasound scanning with Doppler was used in three cases as a means of localizing the aneurysm and identifying all feeding vessels; the complete cessation of flow within the aneurysm in the case in which the feeding vessels were simply ligated was also documented. The average intraoperative time was 150 minutes (range, 100 to 190 minutes). The mean estimated blood loss was 105 mL (range, 20 to 300 mL). There were no intraoperative complications. The average hospital stay was 2.2 days (range, 1 to 4 days). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach to splenic artery aneurysm by aneurysmectomy or splenic artery ligation can be safe and effective. The laparoscopic approach affords a short hospital stay and an effective result.     

变异脾动脉瘤腔内治疗15例分析

目的 总结变异脾动脉瘤的腔内治疗经验。方法 回顾性分析2007年4月至2017年4月复旦大学附属中山医院血管外科收治的15例变异脾动脉瘤腔内治疗病人的临床资料,其中5例为A型变异脾动脉瘤,10例为B型变异脾动脉瘤。结果 15例病人中14例腔内治疗成功,操作结束后造影检查示瘤体不再显影;1例术中造影检查后考虑弹簧栓栓塞后移位至肠系膜上动脉风险大且病人动脉瘤直径较小,遂停止手术并随访观察。14例腔内治疗成功的病人中,1例行单纯瘤腔栓塞,5例行出瘤动脉及瘤腔栓塞,1例行入瘤动脉、瘤腔及出瘤动脉栓塞,1例行瘤腔栓塞及肠系膜上动脉覆膜支架置入,2例行出瘤动脉栓塞及肠系膜上动脉覆膜支架置入,4例行出瘤动脉、瘤腔栓塞及肠系膜上动脉覆膜支架置入。随访2～117个月,无失访或死亡病例,无肠道缺血坏死、症状性脾梗死、动脉瘤破裂等严重并发症发生。1例病人7年后再发腹痛,再次腔内治疗行瘤腔密集填塞,术后腹痛消失,密切随访。1例病人腔内治疗行出瘤动脉栓塞及肠系膜上动脉覆膜支架置入,术后第2年随访动脉造影检查示覆膜支架完全闭塞,Riolan弓显影,支架远端肠系膜上动脉灌注良好。结论 腔内治疗变异脾动脉瘤安全、有效。在腔内治疗过程中,除了对动脉瘤完成满意的血流隔绝,还应重视保护肠系膜上动脉。     

脾动脉瘤27例临床诊治

目的 总结脾动脉瘤(splenic artery aneurysm,SAAs)的诊治经验,探讨不同治疗方式安全性和可行性.方法 回顾性分析2002年5月至2020年6月浙江大学附属杭州市第一人民医院血管外科(n=25)和第二军医大学附属东方肝胆外科医院肝外四科(n=2)收治的27例SAAs患者资料,其中传统开腹手术4例...     

Endovascular exclusion of popliteal artery aneurysms with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene stent-grafts: early results

There is increasing interest in using endovascular methods instead of surgical reconstruction to treat popliteal artery aneurysms. Exclusive use of the Viabahn stent-graft, a nitinol stent covered with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, was assessed in the treatment of patients who presented with popliteal artery aneurysms in the absence of acute limb ischemia. Technical success, endoleaks, graft patency, freedom from amputation, and aneurysm sac flow and size changes were assessed by duplex ultrasound. From June 2004 to March 2006, 16 men (mean age, 76 years; range, 65-83) underwent endovascular exclusion of 23 popliteal artery aneurysms (mean diameter, 2.5 cm; range, 1.3-6.7 cm). Nine lesions had partial thrombus on preprocedural duplex imaging. Nineteen of the 23 limbs treated had at least 2-vessel tibial artery runoff. Procedures were performed under local anesthesia using ipsilateral percutaneous antegrade arterial access. All patients received 75 mg/day of clopidogrel afterward. Follow-up assessments included direct clinical examinations and duplex ultrasonography performed 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Primary patency and amputation-free survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Complete aneurysm exclusion (technical success) was achieved in all cases. During the mean follow-up of 7 months (range, 1-21 months), 22 of 23 treated limbs remained asymptomatic. One stent-graft thrombosis occurred 6 months after the procedure and was successfully treated with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, balloon angioplasty of a stent-graft stenosis, and insertion of an uncovered nitinol stent. No popliteal artery aneurysm sac size enlargements or endoleaks were detected. At 12 months, the treated limb mean ankle-brachial index was 1.0 (range, 0.82-1.31) and the primary and secondary patency rates were 93% and 100%, respectively. Early results with Viabahn endovascular stent-graft exclusion of asymptomatic popliteal artery aneurysms are promising. Patient selection for endovascular repair depends on suitable popliteal artery anatomy, extent of aneurysmal degeneration, and quality of tibial arterial runoff.     

Thoracic aortic aneurysms: treatment with endovascular self-expandable stent grafts

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of endovascular stent graft placement in the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. METHODS: Between November 1996 and February 1999, endovascular stent graft repair was used in 21 patients. There were 5 women and 16 men with a mean age of 67 years (range, 41 to 87 years). An atherosclerotic aneurysm with a diameter of more than 6 cm was the indication for intervention in 19 patients (90.5%). In 2 patients (9.5%), a localized aortic dissection with a diameter of more than 6 cm was treated. In 71.4% (15 of 21) of patients, multiple stents were necessary for aneurysm exclusion. To allow safe deployment of the stent graft, preliminary subclavian-carotid artery transposition was performed in 9 patients (42.9%). Vascular access was achieved through a small incision in the abdominal aorta (n = 6), an iliac artery (n = 8), or a femoral artery (n = 7). Talent and Prograft stent grafts were used. RESULTS: Successful deployment of the endovascular stent grafts was achieved in all patients. Two patients died postoperatively (mortality rate, 9.5%), 1 of aneurysmal rupture and the other of impaired perfusion of the celiac axis. Repeat stenting was done in 3 patients because of intraoperative leakage. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular stent graft repair is a promising and less invasive alternative to exclude the aneurysm from blood flow. This technique allows treatment of patients who are unsuitable for conventional surgical procedures. An exact definition of inclusion criteria and technical development of stent grafts should contribute to further improvements in clinical results.     

肾动脉瘤的血管腔内治疗

目的评价血管腔内治疗对于肾动脉瘤（RAA）的安全性及疗效。方法回顾性分析11例接受血管腔内治疗的RAA患者,治疗方法包括单纯以弹簧圈填塞动脉瘤腔（6例）、载瘤动脉栓塞术（3例）和覆膜支架隔绝术（2例）,并随访3～68个月。结果11例患者共发现13个RAA（右肾9个,左肾4个）,均为真性囊状动脉瘤,对其中11例（11个RAA）行血管腔内治疗。术后5例出现栓塞后综合征,其中4例发生部分肾梗死,肾功能无异常;未见其他严重并发症。随访未见动脉瘤内残腔及内瘘,未见动脉瘤破裂及复发。结论血管腔内治疗RAA安全、有效,成功率高。     

Is Endovascular Therapy the Preferred Treatment for All Visceral Artery Aneurysms?

Endovascular intervention can provide an alternative method of treatment for visceral artery aneurysms. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with visceral artery aneurysms at a single university medical center from 1990 to 2003, focusing on the outcome of endovascular therapy. Sixty-five patients with visceral artery aneurysms were identified: 39 splenic (SAA), 13 renal, seven celiac, three superior mesenteric (SMA), and three hepatic. Eleven patients (16.9%) had symptoms attributable to their aneurysms, which included a total of four ruptures (6.2%): three splenic and one hepatic. Management consisted of 18 (27.7%) endovascular interventions, nine (13.9%) open surgical repairs, and 38 (58.5%) observations. Mean aneurysm diameter for patients treated expectantly was significantly less than for those who underwent intervention (p = 0.001). Endovascular interventions included 15 (83.3%) embolizations (11 SAA, three renal, one hepatic) and three (16.7%) stent grafts (two SMA, one renal). The initial technical success rate of the endovascular procedures was 94.4% (17/18). However, there were four patients (22.2%) with major endovascular procedure-related complications: one late recurrence requiring open surgical repair, two large symptomatic splenic infarcts, and one episode of severe pancreatitis. These four patients had distal splenic artery aneurysms at or adjacent to the splenic hilum. There were no endovascular procedure-related deaths. Reasons for performing open surgical repair included three SAA ruptures diagnosed at laparotomy and complex anatomy not amenable to endovascular intervention (six patients). One surgical patient had a postoperative small bowel obstruction treated nonoperatively; and there was one perioperative death in a patient operated on emergently for rupture. Endovascular management of visceral artery aneurysms is a reasonable alternative to open surgical repair in carefully selected patients. Individual anatomic considerations play an important role in determining the best treatment strategy if intervention is warranted. However, four of 11 (36.4%) patients with distal splenic artery aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization developed major complications. Based on our experience, traditional surgical treatment of SAA with repair or ligation and concomitant splenectomy when necessary may be preferred in these cases.Presented at the Twenty-ninth Annual Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Anaheim, CA, June 4, 2004.     

Evolution of the therapeutic approach of visceral artery aneurysms

INTRODUCTION: Visceral artery aneurysms are an infrequent entity. Most of them are asymptomatic, but when they present as a rupture, a high mortality is associated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We review our experience of 18 cases between 1988 and 2006. RESULTS: 9 males and 9 females with a mean age of 66,5 years are analyzed. Aneurysms were located in splenic artery (9), hepatic artery (2), superior mesenteric artery (2), celiac trunk (3), inferior mesenteric artery (1) and gastroduodenal artery (1). Three of them were associated with abdominal aorta aneurysms. Fourteen patients were asymptomatic, three presented abdominal pain and one case presented with rupture and intraperitoneal bleeding. Surgical treatment was performed in thirteen of the patients and endovascular in five. Two cases of endovascular treatment failed and surgery was necessary. Postsurgical mortality was 0 and complications appeared in 2 patients. Mean hospital stay after surgical treatment was 11 days and 3 days after endovascular one. None of the patients presented recurrences, and one has chronic mesenteric ischemia as sequelae of surgical treatment of a superior mesenteric artery aneurysm. CONCLUSION: Visceral artery aneurysms must be treated if it is feasible, due to the potential risk of rupture. Endovascular treatment associates lower morbimortality rates and shorter hospital stay than surgical one, but nowadays many aneurysms are not suitable for this management. Endovascular treatment is a technically difficult approach, that requires a specific training and the first cases represent a learning curve.     

Endovascular Stent-Graft Repair of Mycotic Aneurysms of the Aorta: A Case Series with a 22-Month Follow-Up

Background  The purpose of the present study was to present a single-institution series of patients with mycotic aneurysms of the aorta treated with endovascular stent-graft technology, and to report the efficacy and short-term durability of this repair. Methods  A retrospective review of seven consecutive patients with mycotic aneurysms of the aorta treated with stent-graft between May 2006 and July 2007. Patients were diagnosed based on typical appearance of imaging together with a positive bacteriology culture or clinical evidence of infection. A bifurcated, aorto-uni-iliac (AUI) stent-graft and cuff were used in the endovascular repair after infection control. The follow-up protocol included regular clinical examination, hematologic tests, and computed tomography scans at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Results  Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was performed successfully in the seven patients (all men, median age 56 years), with complete exclusion of the aneurysms. Five of the patients had infrarenal aortic aneurysms, and the other two had descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. The median hospital stay was 22 days, with no hospital deaths. No paraplegia or other major complications occurred. The patients remained well, with no evidence of graft infection at a mean follow-up of 22.7 months (range: 17–26 months). A significant reduction in the diameter of the aneurysm sac was noted on computed tomography scans in all the patients at 1 year (mean: 6.5 mm; range: 3–40 mm). Conclusions  Endovascular stent-graft treatment represents an alternative treatment with acceptable short-term outcomes for patients with mycotic aneurysms of the aorta.     

Management of aneurysms involving branches of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries: a comparison of surgical and endovascular therapy

OBJECTIVE: Aneurysms involving branches of the superior mesenteric and celiac arteries are uncommon and require proper management to prevent rupture and death. This study compares surgical and endovascular treatment of these aneurysms and analyzes outcome. METHODS: Patients at the Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York who were treated for aneurysms in the branches of the celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery were identified through a search of the institution's medical records and endovascular database. Patient demographics, history, clinical presentation, aneurysm characteristics, treatments, and follow-up outcome were retrospectively recorded. Significant differences between patients treated by surgical or endovascular therapy were determined by using Student's t test and chi2 analysis. RESULTS: Between January 1, 1991, and July 1, 2005, 59 patients with 61 aneurysms were treated at a single institution. Twenty-four patients had surgical repair, and 35 underwent endovascular treatment, which included coil embolization and stent-graft therapy. Splenic (28) and hepatic (22) artery aneurysms predominated. Eighty-nine percent of splenic artery aneurysms were true aneurysms and were treated by endovascular and surgical procedures in near equal numbers (14 and 11, respectively). Pseudoaneurysms were significantly more likely to be treated by endovascular means (P < .01). The technical success rate of endovascular treatment for aneurysms was 89%, and failures were successfully treated by repeat coil embolization in all patients who presented for retreatment. Patients treated by endovascular techniques had a significantly higher incidence of malignancy than patients treated with open surgical techniques (P = .03). Furthermore, patients treated by endovascular means had a shorter in-hospital length of stay (2.4 vs 6.6 days, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Endovascular management of visceral aneurysms is an effective means of treating aneurysms involving branches of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries and is particularly useful in patients with comorbidities, including cancer. It is associated with a decreased length of stay in the elective setting, and failure of primary treatment can often be successfully managed percutaneously.     

脾动脉瘤7例诊治分析

目的：探讨脾动脉瘤的诊断和手术治疗方法。方法：回顾性分析7 例脾动脉瘤患者的临床资料。结果：6例经彩色多普勒超声（B超）初步诊断;4例经CT动脉造影（CTA）,2例经数字减影血管造影术（DSA）,1例经磁共振造影（MRA）确诊;无1例依靠临床症状而确诊。单纯脾动脉瘤切除术1例,脾动脉瘤加脾脏切除术1例,脾动脉瘤切除加动脉重建术1例,动脉瘤近远端脾动脉结扎术1例,脾动脉瘤栓塞术2例,脾动脉瘤栓塞术加脾切除术1例。随访2个月至3年。无死亡及严重并发症病例。结论：脾动脉瘤依赖临床表现难以诊断,B超有筛选价值,CTA,MRA,DSA均有诊断价值。一旦确诊应尽早选择腔内介入栓塞治疗或手术方法。     

Midterm results of endovascular stented grafts for the treatment of isolated iliac artery aneurysms.

PURPOSE: Isolated aneurysms of the iliac arteries are uncommon lesions that require surgical repair to prevent rupture. METHODS: During a 4-year period, we used endovascular stented grafts (EGs) to treat 28 iliac artery aneurysms that were not associated with aortic aneurysms. Twenty-five patients, with a total of 24 common iliac (15 right, nine left) and four internal iliac (two right, two left) artery aneurysms, underwent endovascular grafting. There were 24 men and 1 woman, with a mean age of 74 years (range, 51 to 88 years). Combined common and internal iliac artery aneurysms were present in three patients. Nineteen patients who underwent treatment with EGs were administered epidural anesthesia (22 epidural, two local, one general). Before surgery, one patient had lower extremity embolization and ischemia from the aneurysm, three had abdominal or back pain, and the remaining were asymptomatic. The EGs were constructed of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts and balloon expandable stents. RESULTS: Four procedure-related complications (12%) occurred (distal extremity embolization, n = 1; wound complications, n = 2; colonic mucosal ischemia, n = 1). Only a minimal reduction in the aneurysmal diameter was seen in 90% of the iliac artery aneurysms treated. The remaining lesions showed no change in size, and no aneurysm had an increase in cross-sectional diameter on computed tomographic images enduring a follow-up period up to 4 years (mean, 24 months). One aneurysm ruptured after successful endovascular exclusion, and the patient underwent treatment with open repair. The 3-year primary patency rate of iliac EGs was 86%. CONCLUSION: EGs appear to show satisfactory safety and efficacy for the repair of isolated aneurysms of the iliac arteries.     

Lessons learned in adopting endovascular techniques for treating abdominal aortic aneurysm

HYPOTHESIS: Endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic and common iliac aneurysms can be performed safely, and in the short term represents a feasible alternative to traditional, open aneurysm repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients were treated with endovascular grafts for 39 abdominal aortic and 2 common iliac artery aneurysms. RESULTS: All devices were successfully deployed. The size of the abdominal aortic aneurysms varied from 4.9 to 11.9 cm (average, 6.13 cm). The median procedure time was 195 minutes. There was one iliac artery rupture, which required celiotomy for repair. The hospital stay varied from 2 to 39 days (average, 6.7 days). The perioperative mortality rate was 2.4%. Sixteen patients (39%) had groin wound complications. Ten patients (24%) had evidence of contrast (endoleak) within the aneurysm sac on completion of the procedure. There were no obvious direct leaks from either the point of proximal or distal fixation. Seven of these endoleaks have resolved spontaneously. Two patients required additional procedures in the postoperative period to treat endoleak. The final patient has evidence of persistent endoleak on 3-month surveillance computed tomography scan. Major late problems occurred in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with large abdominal aortic aneurysms and considerable cardiac comorbidity can safely undergo endovascular aneurysm repair. Femoral groin wound complications resulting in prolonged hospitalization remain the major cause of perioperative morbidity. In contradistinction to open aneurysm repair, long-term surveillance is essential to detect migration of the device and identify flow within the residual aneurysm sac-complications that could lead to aneurysm rupture following endovascular repair.