Role of brain neuroactive steroids in the functional interplay between the GABA(A) and the NPY-Y1 receptor mediated signals in the amygdala

Various lines of evidence suggest a functional interaction between GABA(A) and Neuropeptide Y (NPY)-Y(1) receptor (Y(1)R) mediated transmissions in various brain regions, which can be important in the regulation of sedation, feeding, anxious behaviour and neuronal excitability. By using a transgenic mouse model carrying the murine Y(1)R gene promoter fused to the lacZ reporter gene (Y(1)R/LacZ mice), we showed that prolonged pharmacologically or physiologically induced changes in the cerebrocortical concentrations of the neuroactive steroids 3alpha-hydroxy-5alpha-pregnan- 20-one (3alpha,5alpha TH PROG) and tetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone (3alpha,5alpha TH DOC) increases Y(1)R/LacZ transgene expression in the central and medial amygdala, an effect similar to that induced by long-term treatment with positive modulators of the GABA(A) receptor complex (diazepam or abecarnil). We also demonstrated that fluctuations in the cerebrocortical concentrations of 3alpha,5alpha-TH PROG and 3alpha,5alpha TH DOC during voluntary ethanol consumption and ethanol withdrawal induces a marked increase in Y(1)R gene expression that becomes apparent 48 h after withdrawal. These data provide evidence that neuroactive steroids may play an important role in the functional interaction between the GABA(A) receptor and NPY-Y(1)R mediated pathways in the amygdala, which might represent an important regulatory mechanism for modulation of several functions, including ethanol withdrawal.     

Chronic modulation of the GABA(A) receptor complex regulates Y1 receptor gene expression in the medial amygdala of transgenic mice

NPY exerts anxiolytic effects, which are mediated by activation of Y1 receptors in the amygdala. It has been shown that diazepam counteracts the anxiogenic effect of Y1 receptor antagonists, suggesting that NPYergic and GABAergic systems are coupled in the regulation of anxiety. We used a transgenic mouse model, expressing a mouse Y1 receptor-beta-galactosidase fusion gene (Y1R/LacZ), to study the effect of positive or negative modulators of GABA(A) receptors on Y1 receptor gene expression. Mice were treated for 14 days with diazepam (4 or 20 mg/kg), the anxiolytic beta-carboline-derivative abecarnil (0.3 or 6 mg/kg) and the anxiogenic beta-carboline FG7142 (20 mg/kg). Transgene expression was determined by quantitative analysis of beta-galactosidase histochemical staining in the medial amygdala and in the medial habenula as a control region. Chronic treatment with 20 mg/kg diazepam or 6 mg/kg abecarnil significantly increased, whereas FG 7142 decreased, transgene expression in the medial amygdala. A transient decrease in transgene expression was observed in the medial amygdala six hours after the acute treatment with 20 mg/kg FG 7142 but not with diazepam or abecarnil. No significant changes were observed in the medial habenula. These data suggest that modulation of GABA(A) receptor function may regulate Y1 receptor gene expression in medial amygdala.     

Involvement of neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor in the regulation of amphetamine-mediated appetite suppression

Recently, we reported that an initial decrease followed by recovery of food intake was observed during four days of amphetamine (AMPH) treatment and suggested that these changes in response were mediated by changes in neuropeptide Y (NPY) and proopiomelanocortin (POMC). Here we investigated if Y1 receptor (Y1R) and/or Y5 receptor (Y5R) might be involved in this regulation. Rats were treated daily with AMPH for four days. Changes in the expression levels of Y1R, Y5R, melanocortin receptor 3 (MC3R), and NPY were assessed and compared. Results showed that Y1R and MC3R increased, with a maximal increase of about 210% on Day 2 but with a restoration to the normal level on Day 4. In contrast, NPY decreased with a biggest reduction of about 45% on Day 2 and the pattern of expression during AMPH treatment was opposite to those of Y1R and MC3R, while the expression of Y5R was not changed. Central inhibitions of NPY formation or Y1R activity modulated the anorectic response of AMPH and the reciprocal regulation of NPY and MC3R, revealing a crucial role of Y1R in this action. It is suggested that Y1R participates in the reciprocal regulation of NPY- and MC3R-containing neurons in the hypothalamus during the anorectic effect of AMPH. These results may further the understanding of Y1R in the control of eating.     

Neuropeptide Y and corticotropin-releasing factor bi-directionally modulate inhibitory synaptic transmission in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) have opposing effects on stress and anxiety. Both can modify synaptic activity through their binding to NPY receptors (YRs) and CRF receptors (CRFRs) respectively. The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) is a brain region with enriched expression of both NPY and YRs and CRF and CRFRs. A component of the "extended amygdala", the BNST is anatomically well-situated to integrate stress and reward-related processing in the CNS, regulating activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and reward circuits. Using whole-cell recordings in a BNST slice preparation, we found that NPY and CRF inhibit and enhance GABAergic transmission, respectively. Pharmacological experiments suggest that NPY depresses GABAergic transmission through activation of the Y2 receptor (Y2R), while both pharmacological and genetic experiments suggest that CRF and urocortin enhance GABAergic transmission through activation of the CRF receptor 1 (CRFR1). Further, the data suggest that NPY acts to regulate GABA release, while CRF enhances postsynaptic responses to GABA. These results suggest potential anatomical and cellular substrates for the robust behavioral interactions between NPY and CRF.     

NPY presynaptic actions are reduced in the hypothalamic mpPVN of obese (fa/fa), but not lean, Zucker rats in vitro

1. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) profoundly enhances feeding when injected intracerebroventricularly, or directly into hypothalamic nuclei, such as the paraventricular nucleus (PVN). Paradoxically, NPY has a reduced action on feeding in obese Zucker rats relative to lean Zucker rats, although the obese rats have much higher levels of hypothalamic NPY expression. GABAergic inputs to a subpopulation of medial parvocellular PVN (mpPVN) neurons are sensitive to NPY. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the blunted eating response to NPY observed in obese Zucker rats will be reflected in a reduced NPY action at mpPVN GABAergic synapses. 2. 'Blind' whole-cell patch-clamp recordings made from mpPVN neurons in acute brain slices of lean and obese Zucker rats revealed GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSC) responses which were inhibited by NPY. While the maximum response in the obese Zucker rats was significantly less than in lean Zucker or Sprague-Dawley rats, there was no difference in the EC(50). 3.Experiments using blocking concentrations of Y(1)- or Y(5)-receptor antagonists revealed no differences between lean and obese Zucker rats in the contributions of either of these receptors to the total NPY response in mpPVN. 4. NPY is less effective at the mpPVN GABA synapse in obese than in lean Zucker rats. This is not associated with a change in the proportion of Y(1) or Y(5) receptors mediating the NPY response, and is consistent with the downregulation of NPY receptors or a reduction in receptor-effector coupling, and with the reduced sensitivity of obese rats to NPY.     

Central Neuropeptide Y Modulates Binge-Like Ethanol Drinking in C57BL/6J Mice via Y1 and Y2 Receptors

Frequent binge drinking has been linked to heart disease, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, and the development of ethanol dependence. Thus, identifying pharmaceutical targets to treat binge drinking is of paramount importance. Here we employed a mouse model of binge-like ethanol drinking to study the role of neuropeptide Y (NPY). To this end, the present set of studies utilized pharmacological manipulation of NPY signaling, immunoreactivity (IR) mapping of NPY and NPY receptors, and electrophysiological recordings from slice preparations of the amygdala. The results indicated that central infusion of NPY, a NPY Y1 receptor (Y1R) agonist, and a Y2R antagonist significantly blunted binge-like ethanol drinking in C57BL/6J mice (that achieved blood ethanol levels >80 mg/dl in control conditions). Binge-like ethanol drinking reduced NPY and Y1R IR in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), and 24 h of ethanol abstinence after a history of binge-like drinking promoted increases of Y1R and Y2R IR. Electrophysiological recordings of slice preparations from the CeA showed that binge-like ethanol drinking augmented the ability of NPY to inhibit GABAergic transmission. Thus, binge-like ethanol drinking in C57BL/6J mice promoted alterations of NPY signaling in the CeA, and administration of exogenous NPY compounds protected against binge-like drinking. The current data suggest that Y1R agonists and Y2R antagonists may be useful for curbing and/or preventing binge drinking, protecting vulnerable individuals from progressing to the point of ethanol dependence.     

Anxiolytic action of group II and III metabotropic glutamate receptors agonists involves neuropeptide Y in the amygdala

Several lines of evidence indicate that activation of group II and III metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors produces anxiolytic-like effects in rodents. On the other hand neuropeptide Y (NPY) induces an anxiolytic effect in rats after intraventricular or intraamygdalar administration. Therefore, in the present study we investigated whether the anxiolytic action of (2S,3S,4S)-(carboxycyclopropyl)glycine (L-CCG-I), an mGlu2/3 receptor agonist, and (1S,3R,4S)-1-aminocyclopentane-1,3,4-tricarboxylic acid (ACPT-1), an mGluR4/6/7/8 receptor agonist, was mediated by a mechanism involving NPY receptor. In behavioral studies, the anxiolytic activity of L-CCG-I (10 microg/0.5 microl/site) and ACPT-1 (1.5 microg/0.5 microl/site) was examined using plus-maze tests. The Y1 receptor antagonist BIBO 3304 was given at a dose of 128 ng/0.5 microl/site. All the compounds tested were injected bilaterally into the amygdala, BIBO 40 min and mGluR agonists 30 min before the test. It was found that the anxiolytic effects of mGluR agonists were abolished by BIBO 3304 {((R)-N-[[4-(aminocarbonylaminomethyl) phenyl] methyl]-N2-(diphenylacetyl)-argininamide trifluoroacetate)3304} administration. Immunohistochemical studies showed a moderate density of mGlu2/3 receptor immunoreactivity (IR) in the amygdala. The effect of L-CCG-I and ACPT-1 on NPY expression in the amygdala was studied using immunohistochemistry (IH), while NPYmRNA expression was studied using in situ hybrydization. We showed a diminution in NPY-IR after L-CCG-I administration and decrease in NPYmRNA expression after both L-CCG-I and ACPT-1 treatment, to about 77% (IH) or 32-41% (mRNA) of the control level 18 h after injection of these mGluR agonists. Our results indicate that the anxiolytic action of both compounds is conveyed by NPY neurons with the involvement of Y1 receptors in the amygdala, and that NPY neurons seem to be regulated by the glutamatergic system.     

Neuropeptide Y modulates effects of bradykinin and prostaglandin E2 on trigeminal nociceptors via activation of the Y1 and Y2 receptors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although previous studies have demonstrated that neuropeptide Y (NPY) modulates nociceptors, the relative contributions of the Y1 and Y2 receptors are unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of Y1 and Y2 receptor activation on nociceptors stimulated by bradykinin (BK) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Combined immunohistochemistry (IHC) with in situ hybridization (ISH) demonstrated that Y1- and Y2-receptors are collocated with bradykinin (2) (B2)-receptors in rat trigeminal ganglia (TG). The relative functions of the Y1 and Y2 receptors in modulating BK/PGE2-evoked CGRP release and increased intracellular calcium levels in cultured TG neurons were evaluated. KEY RESULTS: The Y1 and Y2 receptors are co-expressed with B2 in TG neurons, suggesting the potential for direct NPY modulation of BK responses. Pretreatment with the Y1 agonist [Leu31,Pro34]-NPY, inhibited BK/PGE2-evoked CGRP release. Conversely, pretreatment with PYY(3-36), a Y2 agonist, increased BK/PGE2 evoked CGRP release. Treatment with NPY evoked an overall inhibitory effect, although of lesser magnitude. Similarly, [Leu31,Pro34]-NPY inhibited BK/PGE2-evoked increases in intracellular calcium levels whereas PYY(3-36) increased responses. NPY inhibition of BK/PGE2-evoked release of CGRP was reversed by the Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBO3304, and higher concentrations of BIBO3304 significantly facilitated CGRP release. The Y2 receptor antagonist, BIIE0246, enhanced the inhibitory NPY effects. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results demonstrate that NPY modulation of peptidergic neurons is due to net activation of inhibitory Y1 and excitatory Y2 receptor systems. The relative expression or activity of these opposing receptor systems may mediate dynamic responses to injury and pain.     

Neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor knockdown can modify glutathione peroxidase and c-AMP response element-binding protein in phenylpropanolamine-treated rats

It has been reported that antioxidative enzymes, neuropeptide Y (NPY), and c-AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) are involved in regulating phenylpropanolamine (PPA)-mediated appetite suppression. Here, we investigated whether Y1 receptor (Y1R) might be involved in this regulation. Rats were daily treated with PPA for 4 days. Changes in the contents of NPY, Y1R, glutathione peroxidase (GP), and CREB were assessed and compared. Results showed that Y1R, GP, and CREB increased, with a maximal increase about 100, 200, and 150 %, respectively, on Day 2. By contrast, NPY decreased with a biggest reduction about 48 % on Day 2 and the pattern of expression during PPA treatment was opposite to those of Y1R, GP, and CREB. Central knockdown (using antisense) or inhibition (using antagonist) of Y1R expression modulated the anorectic response of PPA and the reciprocal regulation between NPY and GP (or CREB), revealing an essential role of Y1R in regulating NPY, GP, and CREB. These results suggest that Y1R participates in the reciprocal regulation of NPY, GP, and CREB in the hypothalamus during PPA treatment in conscious rats. The present results may aid the therapeutic research of PPA and related antiobesity drugs.     

Neuropeptide tyrosine and pain

Research during the past two decades supports a complex role for neuropeptide tyrosine (NPY) and two of its associated receptors, the Y1 receptor and the Y2 receptor, in the modulation of pain, in addition to regeneration and survival mechanisms at the spinal level. Thus, NPY has been shown to both cause and reduce pain, in addition to having biphasic effects. Recent research has focused on the distribution of the spinal NPY-mediated system. Here, we propose various possible scenarios for the role of NPY in pain processing, based on its actions at different sites (axon versus cell body), through different receptors (Y1 receptor versus Y2 receptor) and/or types of neuron (ganglion neurons and intraganglionic cross-excitation versus interneurons versus projection neurons).     

The neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor subtype is necessary for the anxiolytic-like effects of neuropeptide Y,but not the antidepressant-like effects of fluoxetine,in mice

Rationale Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is implicated in the pathophysiology of affective illness. Multiple receptor subtypes (Y1R, Y2R, and Y5R) have been suggested to contribute to NPY’s effects on rodent anxiety and depression-related behaviors. Objectives To further elucidate the role of Y1R in (1) NPY’s anxiolytic-like effects and (2) fluoxetine’s antidepressant-like and neurogenesis-inducing effects. Methods Mice lacking Y1R were assessed for spontaneous anxiety-like behavior (open field, elevated plus-maze, and light/dark exploration test) and Pavlovian fear conditioning, and for the anxiolytic-like effects of intracerebroventricularly (icv)-administrated NPY (elevated plus-maze). Next, Y1R −/− were assessed for the antidepressant-like effects of acute fluoxetine in the forced swim test and chronic fluoxetine in the novelty-induced hypophagia test, as well as for chronic fluoxetine-induced hippocampal neurogenesis. Results Y1R −/− exhibited largely normal baseline behavior as compared to +/+ littermate controls. Intraventricular administration of NPY in Y1R −/− mice failed to produce the normal anxiolytic-like effect in the elevated plus-maze test seen in +/+ mice. Y1R mutant mice showed higher immobility in the forced swim test and longer latencies in the novelty-induced hypophagia test. In addition, Y1R −/− mice responded normally to the acute and chronic effects of fluoxetine treatment in the forced swim test and the novelty-induced hypophagia test, respectively, as well as increased neuronal precursor cell proliferation in the hippocampus. Conclusions These data demonstrate that Y1R is necessary for the anxiolytic-like effects of icv NPY, but not for the antidepressant-like or neurogenesis-inducing effects of fluoxetine. The present study supports targeting Y1R as a novel therapeutic target for anxiety disorders.     

Functional interaction between neuropeptide Y receptors and modulation of calcium channels in the rat hippocampus

We investigated the functional interaction between neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors using nerve terminals and cultured rat hippocampal neurons, and we evaluated the involvement of voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels (VGCCs) in NPY receptors-induced inhibition of Ca(2+) influx and glutamate release. The KCl-evoked release of glutamate from hippocampal synaptosomes was inhibited by 1 microM NPY and this effect was insensitive to either BIBP3226 (Y1 receptor antagonist) or L-152,804 (Y5 receptor antagonist), but was sensitive to BIIE0246 (Y2 receptor antagonist). We could also pharmacologically dissect the NPY receptors activity by using Y1, Y2 and Y5 receptor agonists ([Leu(31),Pro(34)]NPY, NPY13-36, NPY (19-23)-(Gly(1),Ser(3),Gln(4),Thr(6),Ala(31),Aib(32),Gln(34))-pancreatic polypeptide (PP), respectively), and in all the cases we observed that these agonists could inhibited the KCl-induced release of glutamate. However, the selective and specific co-activation of both Y1 and Y2 or Y2 and Y5 receptors resulted in non-additive inhibition, and this effect was prevented in the presence of the Y2 antagonist, but was insensitive to the Y1 or Y5 receptor antagonist. Moreover, as we previously showed for Y1 receptors, we also observed that the activation of Y5 receptors inhibited the glutamate release in the dentate gyrus and CA3 subregion, without significant effect in the CA1 subregion of the hippocampus. The same qualitative results were obtained when we investigated the role of NPY Y1 and Y2 receptors in modulating the changes in [Ca(2+)](i) due to KCl depolarisation in cultured hippocampal neurons. The inhibitory effect of nitrendipine (L-type VGCC blocker) or omega-conotoxin GVIA (omega-CgTx; N-type VGCC blocker) was not potentiated by the simultaneous activation of Y1 or Y2 receptors. Moreover, the exocytotic release of glutamate was inhibited by omega-agatoxin IVA (omega-Aga; P-/Q-type VGCC blocker), and this VGCC blocker did not potentiate Y1, Y2 or Y5 receptor-mediated inhibition of glutamate release. Also, the effect of ionomycin in inducing the exocytotic release of glutamate from hippocampal synaptosomes was insensitive to the activation of NPY receptors. In the present paper, we identified a role for NPY Y1, Y2 and Y5 receptors in modulating the exocytotic release of glutamate and the [Ca(2+)](i) changes in the rat hippocampus. In conditions of co-activation, there appears to exist a physiological cross-talk between Y1 and Y2 and also between Y2 and Y5 receptors, in which Y2 receptors play a predominant role. Moreover, we also show that Y1 and Y2 receptors exert their inhibitory action by directly modulating L-, N-, and P-/Q-type VGCCs, whereas the inhibition of glutamate release mediated by the Y5 receptors seems to involve P-/Q-type VGCCs.     

Blockade of neuropeptide Y(2) receptors and suppression of NPY's anti-epileptic actions in the rat hippocampal slice by BIIE0246

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) has been shown to suppress synaptic excitation in rat hippocampus by a presynaptic action. The Y(2) (Y(2)R) and the Y(5) (Y(5)R) receptors have both been implicated in this action. We used the non-peptide, Y(2)R-selective antagonist, BIIE0246, to test the hypothesis that the Y(2)R mediates both the presynaptic inhibitory and anti-epileptic actions of NPY in rat hippocampus in vitro. NPY and the Y(2)R-selective agonist, [ahx(5-24)]NPY, both inhibited the population excitatory postsynaptic potential (pEPSP) evoked in area CA1 by stratum radiatum stimulation in a concentration-dependent manner. BIIE0246 suppressed the inhibitory effects of both agonists, suppressing the maximal inhibition without causing a change in the agonist EC(50), in a manner inconsistent with competitive antagonism. BIIE0246 washed out from hippocampal slices extremely slowly. Application of agonist at high concentrations (1 - 3 microM) for prolonged periods did not alter the rate of washout, but did partially overcome the antagonism, inconsistent with an insurmountable antagonism by BIIE0246. In the stimulus train-induced bursting (STIB) model of ictal activity in hippocampal slices, both NPY and [ahx(5-24)]NPY inhibited primary afterdischarge (1 degrees AD) activity. BIIE0246 (100 nM) completely suppressed the actions of NPY and [ahx(5-24)]NPY in this model. In contrast, the potent Y(5)R-selective agonist, Ala(31)Aib(32)NPY, affected neither 1 degrees AD activity in the presence of BIIE0246, nor, by itself, even the pEPSP in CA1. BIIE0246 potently suppresses NPY actions in rat hippocampus, suggesting a dominant role for Y(2)R there. The apparently insurmountable antagonism observed may result from the lipophilic nature of the antagonist.     

Diurnal Fluctuations in HPA and Neuropeptide Y-ergic Systems Underlie Differences in Vulnerability to Traumatic Stress Responses at Different Zeitgeber Times

The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis displays a characteristic circadian pattern of corticosterone release, with higher levels at the onset of the active phase and lower levels at the onset of the inactive phase. As corticosterone levels modify the response to stress and influence the susceptibility to and/or severity of stress-related sequelae, we examined the effects of an acute psychological trauma applied at different zeitgeber times (ZTs) on behavioral stress responses. Rats were exposed to stress either at the onset of the inactive-(light) phase (ZT=0) or at the onset of the active-(dark) phase (ZT=12). Their behavior in the elevated plus-maze and acoustic startle response paradigms were assessed 7 days post exposure for retrospective classification into behavioral response groups. Serum corticosterone levels and the dexamethasone suppression test were used to assess the stress response and feedback inhibition of the HPA axis. Immunoreactivity for neuropeptide Y (NPY) and NPY-Y1 receptor (Y1R) in the paraventricular (PVN) and arcuate (ARC) hypothalamic nuclei, hippocampus, and basolateral amygdala were measured. The behavioral effects of NPY/Y1R antagonist microinfused into the PVN 30 min before stress exposure during the inactive or active phase, respectively, were evaluated. PVN immunoreactivity for NPY and Y1R was measured 1 day after the behavioral tests. The time of day of the traumatic exposure markedly affected the pattern of the behavioral stress response and the prevalence of rats showing an extreme behavioral response. Rats exposed to the stressor at the onset of their inactive phase displayed a more traumatic behavioral response, faster post-exposure corticosterone decay, and a more pronounced stress-induced decline in NPY and Y1R expression in the PVN and arcuate hypothalamic nuclei. Blocking PVN Y1R before stress applied in the active phase, or administering NPY to the PVN before stress applied in the inactive phase, had a resounding behavioral effect. The time at which stress occurred significantly affected the behavioral stress response. Diurnal variations in HPA and NPY/Y1R significantly affect the behavioral response, conferring more resilience at the onset of the active phase and more vulnerability at the onset of the inactive phase, implying that NPY has a significant role in conferring resilience to stress-related psychopathology.     

The regulation of veratridine-stimulated electrogenic ion transport in mouse colon by neuropeptide Y (NPY), Y1 and Y2 receptors

1 Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a prominent enteric neuropeptide with prolonged antisecretory effects in mammalian intestine. Veratridine depolarises neurons consequently causing epithelial anion secretion across mouse colon mucosa. Our aim was to characterise functionally, veratridine-stimulated mucosal responses and to determine the roles for NPY, Y(1), and Y(2) receptors in modulating these neurogenic effects. 2 Colon mucosae (with intact submucous innervation) from wild-type mice (+/+) and knockouts lacking either NPY (NPY-/-), Y(1)-/- or Y(2)-/- were placed in Ussing chambers and voltage clamped at 0 mV. Veratridine-stimulated short-circuit current (I(sc)) responses in +/+, Y(1) or Y(2) antagonist pretreated +/+ colon, Y(1)-/- and NPY-/- colon were insensitive to cholinergic blockade by atropine (At; 1 microM) and hexamethonium (Hex; 10 microM). Tetrodotoxin (TTX, 100 nM) abolished veratridine responses, but had no effect upon carbachol (CCh) or vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP)-induced secretory responses. 3 To establish the functional roles for Y(1) and Y(2) receptors, +/+ tissues were pretreated with either the Y(1) or Y(2) receptor antagonist (BIBO3304 (300 nM) or BIIE0246 (1 microM), respectively) and veratridine responses were compared with those from Y(1)-/- or Y(2)-/- colon. Neither BIBO3304 nor Y(1)-/- altered veratridine-induced secretion, but Y(1) agonist responses were abolished in both preparations. In contrast, the Y(2) antagonist BIIE0246 significantly amplified veratridine responses in +/+ mucosa. Unexpectedly, NPY-/- colon exhibited significantly attenuated veratridine responses (between 1 and 5 min). 4 We demonstrate that electrogenic veratridine responses in mouse colon are noncholinergic and that NPY can act directly upon epithelia, a Y(1) receptor effect. The enhanced veratridine response observed in +/+ tissue following BIIE0246, indicates that Y(2) receptors are located on submucosal neurons and that their activation by NPY will inhibit enteric noncholinergic secretory neurotransmission. 5 We also demonstrate Y(1) and Y(2) receptor-mediated antisecretory tone in +/+ colon and show selective loss of each in Y(1) and Y(2) null colon respectively. In NPY-/- tissue, only Y(1)-mediated tone was present, this presumably being mediated by endogenous endocrine peptide YY. Y(2) tone was absent from NPY-/- (and Y(2)-/-) colon and we conclude that NPY activation of neuronal Y(2) receptors attenuates secretory neurotransmission thereby providing an absorptive electrolyte tone in isolated colon.     

Effects of altered amygdalar neuropeptide Y expression on anxiety-related behaviors.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) decreases anxiety-related behaviors in various animal models of anxiety. The purpose of the present study was to examine the role of the amygdalar NPY system in anxiety-related responses in the elevated plus maze. The first experiment determined if herpes virus-mediated alterations in amygdalar NPY levels would alter anxiety-related behaviors in the elevated plus maze. Viral vectors encoding NPY, NPY antisense, or LacZ (control virus) were bilaterally injected into the amygdala, and 4 days postinjection, rats were tested in the elevated plus maze test. NPY-like immunoreactivity (NPY-ir) was measured in the amygdala of these rats. In rats injected with the viral vector encoding NPY, reduced anxiety-related behaviors in the elevated plus maze accompanied by moderate increases in NPY-ir were detected compared to NPY-antisense viral vector-treated subjects. Elevated plus maze behavior did not differ compared to LacZ-treated controls. NPY overexpression at this time point was also suggested by enhanced NPY mRNA expression seen in the amygdala 4 days postinjection using real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. Experiment 2 was conducted to provide further evidence for a role of amygdalar NPY in regulating anxiety-related behaviors in the elevated plus maze test. The nonpeptide NPY Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP 3226 (1.5 microg/microl), was bilaterally injected into the amygdala and rats were tested in the elevated plus maze test. Rats receiving BIBP 3226 exhibited increased anxiety-related behaviors in this test. The results of these experiments provide further support for the role of amygdalar NPY in anxiety-related behaviors.     

The putative neuroprotective role of neuropeptide Y in the central nervous system

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most abundant and widely distributed neuropeptides in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS). An overview of the distribution of the G-protein coupled NPY receptor family (Y(1), Y(2), Y(4), Y(5) receptors) in the brain is described. The coexistence of NPY with other neurotransmitters and its wide distribution in several brain areas predict the high importance of NPY as a neuromodulator. Thus, the effect of NPY on the release of several neurotransmitters such as glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), norepinephrine (NE), dopamine, somastotatin (SOM), serotonin (5-HT), nitric oxide (NO), growth hormone (GH) and corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) is reviewed. A neuroprotective role for NPY under physiological conditions and during hyperactivity such as epileptic-seizures has been suggested. We have shown previously that NPY inhibits glutamate release evoked from hippocampal nerve terminals and has a neuroprotective effect in rat organotypic hippocampal cultures exposed to an excitotoxic insult. Moreover, changes in NPY levels have been observed in different pathological conditions such as brain ischemia and neurodegenerative diseases (Huntington's, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases). Taken together, these studies suggest that NPY and NPY receptors may represent pharmacological targets in different pathophysiological conditions in the CNS.     

Heterogeneity of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) contractile and relaxing receptors in horse penile small arteries

The distribution of neuropeptide Y (NPY)-immunorective nerves and the receptors involved in the effects of NPY upon electrical field stimulation (EFS)- and noradrenaline (NA)-elicited contractions were investigated in horse penile small arteries. NPY-immunoreactive nerves were widely distributed in the erectile tissues with a particularly high density around penile intracavernous small arteries. In small arteries isolated from the proximal part of the corpora cavernosa, NPY (30 nM) produced a variable modest enhancement of the contractions elicited by both EFS and NA. At the same concentration, the NPY Y(1) receptor agonist, [Leu(31), Pro(34)]NPY, markedly potentiated responses to EFS and NA, whereas the NPY Y(2) receptor agonist, NPY(13-36), enhanced exogenous NA-induced contractions. In arteries precontracted with NA, NPY, peptide YY (PYY), [Leu(31), Pro(34)]NPY and the NPY Y(2) receptor agonists, N-acetyl[Leu(28,31)]NPY (24-36) and NPY(13-36), elicited concentration-dependent contractile responses. Human pancreatic polypeptide (hPP) evoked a biphasic response consisting of a relaxation followed by contraction. NPY(3-36), the compound 1229U91 (Ile-Glu-Pro-Dapa-Tyr-Arg-Leu-Arg-Tyr-NH2, cyclic(2,4')diamide) and eventually NPY(13-36) relaxed penile small arteries. The selective NPY Y(1) receptor antagonist BIBP3226 ((R)-N(2)-(diphenacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]D-arginineamide) (0.3 microM) shifted to the right the concentration-response curves to both NPY and [Leu(31), Pro(34)]NPY and inhibited the contractions induced by the highest concentrations of hPP but not the relaxations observed at lower doses. In the presence of the selective NPY Y(2) receptor antagonist BIIE0246 ((S)-N2-[[1-[2-[4-[(R,S)-5,11-dihydro-6(6h)-oxodibenz[b,e]azepin-11-y1]-1-piperazinyl]-2-oxoethyl]cyclo-pentyl-N-[2-[1,2-dihydro-3,5 (4H)-dioxo-1,2-diphenyl-3H-1,2, 4-triazol-4-yl]ethyl]-argininamide) (0.3 microM), the Y(2) receptor agonists NPY(13-36) and N-acetyl[Leu(28,31)]NPY (24-36) evoked potent slow relaxations in NA-precontracted arteries, under conditions of nitric oxide (NO) synthase blockade. Mechanical removal of the endothelium markedly enhanced contractions of NPY on NA-precontracted arteries, whereas blockade of the neuronal voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels did not alter NPY responses. These results demonstrate that NPY can elicit dual contractile/relaxing responses in penile small arteries through a heterogeneous population of postjunctional NPY receptors. Potentiation of the contractions evoked by NA involve both NPY Y(1) and NPY Y(2) receptors. An NO-independent relaxation probably mediated by an atypical endothelial NPY receptor is also shown and unmasked in the presence of selective antagonists of the NPY contractile receptors.     

Chronic stress alters neuropeptide Y signaling in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in DBA/2J but not C57BL/6J mice

Numerous rodent and human studies have demonstrated that neuropeptide Y (NPY) is involved in the regulation of anxiety-related behaviors. In this study, we examined whether there were differences in NPY signaling between two inbred mouse strains (C57BL/6J and DBA/2J) that exhibit divergent basal and stress-induced anxiety phenotypes. We focused on the bed nucleus of the stria terminals (BNST), a structure in the extended amygdala that is important for the regulation of anxiety-like behavior and contains NPY receptors. While results from whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings and immunofluorescence histochemistry revealed no significant basal differences in NPY signaling or NPY and NPY Y2 receptor (Y2R) expression in the BNST, these measures were differentially altered by chronic restraint stress. Ten days of chronic restraint stress increased basal GABAergic transmission and decreased NPY's ability to inhibit evoked GABAergic transmission in the dorsolateral BNST (dlBNST) via Y2R in DBA/2J, but not C57BL/6J, mice. Additionally, restraint stress increased NPY and Y2R expression across subregions of the BNST of DBA/2J mice 24 h after the last stress exposure, but no changes were observed in C57BL/6J mice. Together, these results suggest that chronic restraint stress engages the NPY system and alters NPY modulation of inhibitory transmission in the dlBNST of DBA/2J mice, but not C57BL/6J mice, which may be related to increased expression of anxiety-related behaviors in this strain.     

THERE ARE FEW CATECHOLAMINE- OR NEUROPEPTIDE Y-CONTAINING SYNAPSES IN THE INTERMEDIOLATERAL CELL COLUMN OF RAT THORACIC SPINAL CORD

1. A quantitative electron microscopic immunocytochemical technique was used to assess the number of synapses immunoreactive for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), phenylethanolamine N-methyl-transferase (PNMT) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the intermediolateral cell column in segments T2 and T3 of rat thoracic spinal cord. 2. TH synapses comprised about 5%; PNMT synapses 1-2%; and NPY synapses 1-2% of the total number of synapses in the intermediolateral cell column. All three types of synapses were predominantly or exclusively on dendrites. 3. Our results suggest that catecholamine/NPY neurons may not provide a major synaptic input to sympathetic preganglionic neurons in rat upper thoracic spinal cord.