首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
目的:探究应用3D打印椎间融合器行椎间盘摘除减压融合内固定术对神经根型颈椎病患者矢状位平衡参数的影响.方法:回顾性分析2017年1月~2018年6月在我院行颈椎前路椎间盘切除减压融合内固定术(anterior cervical discectomy and fusion,ACDF)治疗的神经根型颈椎病患者76例,按照随...  相似文献   

2.
目的探讨激光微创治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床效果。方法采用经皮激光椎间盘减压术冶疗神经根型颈椎病32例,40个间隙,其中C4~510个间隙,C5~625个间隙,C6~75个间隙,所有病例均经CT/MRI确诊,且突出椎间盘无钙化或骨化。结果治疗32例,随访6~28个月,按照Macnab法评分,优良率为90.6%,术后无感染及其它并发症发生。结论激光微创治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效确切,关键是把握好适应证及正确的术中操作。  相似文献   

3.
CT引导下射频消融髓核成形术治疗神经根型颈椎病   总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4  
经皮穿刺颈椎间盘髓核成形术(Perecutaneous Cervical Disc Nucleoplasty.PCDN)是继化学溶核、经皮椎间盘切吸术、经皮激光椎间盘减压术后的又一微创技术.本院于2003年7月~2005年4月应用该技术在CT引导下治疗神经根型颈椎病31例.取得较好的临床效果.报道如下:  相似文献   

4.
目的 探讨METRx椎间盘镜下颈椎后路椎间孔切开减压术对神经根型颈椎病及颈椎间盘突出症的治疗效果.方法 METRx椎间盘镜下颈椎后路椎间孔切开减压术治疗9例神经根型颈椎病及2例颈椎间盘突出症.结果 本组11例患者术后MRI检查显示突出椎间盘及神经根压迫消失.随访3个月后JOA脊髓功能评分和VAS评分,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 METRx椎间盘镜下颈椎后路椎间孔切开减压术手术创伤小,术后恢复快,临床疗效优良.  相似文献   

5.
目的:观察颈椎前路Hybrid手术(颈椎前路减压椎间融合术+颈椎全椎间盘置换术)治疗颈椎病的临床疗效.方法:收集2017年7月~2019年12月接受颈椎前路Hybrid手术的颈椎病患者的临床资料,符合纳入和排除标准并获得临床随访资料者共56例,其中获得完整影像学随访资料者40例.56例患者中神经根型颈椎病36例,混合型...  相似文献   

6.
[目的]总结分析经皮穿刺椎间盘激光汽化减压术治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效。[方法]对15例行经皮椎间盘激光汽化减压的神经根型颈椎病患者进行回顾分析,随访期平均1年3个月。[结果]疗效优10例,良2例,可1例,差2例,优良率80%。[结论]经皮椎间盘激光汽化减压术治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效确切。  相似文献   

7.
[目的]比较髓核成形术(PCN)与保守疗法治疗颈椎病(神经根型)的临床效果.[方法]采用回顾性研究,对本院2000年1月~2008年6月因颈椎病(神经根型)住院治疗234例患者,PCN 121例,保守治疗113例.随访6个月~4年8个月,平均2.7年,采用Macnab标准功能评定法和VAS评分评定疗效.[结果]PCN组和保守治疗组总体治疗优良率分别为86.8%和83.5%,无显著性差异(P>0.05);两组平均住院时间分别为4.5 d和16.5 d,有显著性差异(P<0.05);复发率分别为8.3%和23.3%,有显著性差异(P<0.05).1例发生术中等离子刀折断,无法取出;所有病例无发生颈椎间盘炎及颈椎体不稳等并发症.[结论]PCN与保守疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床效果相近,但髓核成形术治疗组复发率低,住院治疗时间短,是一种安全、有效、迅速治疗神经根型颈椎病的微创治疗方式.  相似文献   

8.
目的:探讨应用颈椎人工椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎间盘疾患的效果.方法:对45例颈椎间盘疾病患者(脊髓型颈椎病35例、神经根型颈椎病5例、急性颈椎间盘突出症5例)实施前路减压、Bryan人工椎间盘置换术.其中单节段置换35例,双节段9例,3节段1例.结果:所有患者随访1~12个月,平均8个月.脊髓型颈椎病患者术前JOA评分平均8.5分,术后平均15.5分,平均改善率为88%.神经根型颈椎病和急性颈椎间盘突出症患者的临床症状均消失.平均术后住院时间为4.8d(2~6d),38例术后4周内恢复正常生活和工作,7例在术后2个月内恢复工作.所有病例未见假体移位及神经系统症状加重.有2例分别在术后3个月和11个月时出现假体周围骨桥形成无活动,其余43例在最终随访时各置换节段均保留了活动度.结论:应用Bryan人工椎间盘系统置换治疗颈椎间盘疾患早期效果良好.  相似文献   

9.
[目的]比较椎间盘置换和前路减压融合治疗单节段神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效.[方法]回顾性分析2018年1月-2019年1月手术治疗的单节段神经根型颈椎病63例患者的临床资料,根据术前医患沟通结果,将患者分为两组,其中,置换组30例,融合组33例.比较两组围手术期、随访和影像资料.[结果]两组患者均顺利完成手术,无严重并发...  相似文献   

10.
[目的]分析并找出神经根型颈椎病的X线片、MRI特点以及其相关性,为神经根型颈椎病的诊治提供参考依据.[方法]收集自2005年4月~ 2011年7月门诊及住院的神经根型颈椎病560例患者的X线片、MRI及临床相关数据.对患者临床的表现特点,影像学(X线、MRI)检查结果进行对比和相关性分析.[结果]在引起症状的责任椎间隙,颈椎侧位X线片发现椎体后缘向后增生216例,占38.57%;斜位X线片发现椎间孔增生、狭窄187例,占33.39%;侧位及斜位均发现增生75例,占13.39%;正位X线片发现钩椎关节增生19例,占3.39%,无增生表现63例,占11.25%.颈椎MRI显示单纯椎间盘突出63例,占11.25%;椎间盘突出合并骨质增生者497例,占88.75%.结合X线片和MRI可将神经根型颈椎病分为5型,其骨质增生的部位发现率依次为侧位X线片向后>斜位X线片向外>侧位、斜位X线片向后外>骨质无增生>合并正位X线片向外侧增生型.[结论]通过对神经根压迫因素的X线和MRI综合诊断与分析,找出责任椎间隙神经压迫的部位和原因;针对骨质增生最常见的颈椎间盘后外侧骨质进行减压,是治疗神经根型颈椎病的关键.  相似文献   

11.
Anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) is standard practice for cervical radiculopathy. Irrespective of the precise method used, it involves more or less complete disc removal with resultant anatomical and biomechanical derangements, and frequently the insertion of a bone or prosthetic graft. Anterior cervical foramenotomy is an alternative procedure that allows effective anterior decompression of the nerve root and lateral spinal cord, whilst conserving the native disc, preserving normal anatomy and movement, and protecting against later degeneration at adjacent spaces as far as possible. The aim of the study was to determine the safety and efficacy of anterior cervical foramenotomy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and took the form of a prospective study of 21 cases under the care of a single surgeon. All patients had a single level or two level anterior cervical foramenotomy. All had pre- and postoperative visual analogue scores for arm and neck pain, arm strength, sensation and overall use. A comparison between patients' perceptions and surgeon's observations was also made. Patients were followed up for between 10 and 36 months. Sixty-eight per cent completed full pre- and postoperative assessments. Twenty-eight per cent of the responders had complete arm pain resolution. There were statistically significant reductions in arm and neck pain, and overall disability. The surgeon's impression of improvement paralleled that of the patients. There was one complication with discitis. Anterior cervical foramenotomy is a safe and effective treatment for cervical radiculopathy caused by posterolateral cervical disc prolapse or uncovertebral osteophyte, and might also reduce adjacent segment degeneration.  相似文献   

12.
Cervical laminoplasty for treating multilevel spinal stenosis appears to be a good surgical alternative to the more traditional laminectomy or anterior decompression and fusion. This procedure avoids the morbidity associated with extensive anterior procedures and also appears not to be associated with late kyphosis, which can be seen in patients after a laminectomy. This review outlines the rationale, indications, contraindications, and early clinical results for patients undergoing a posterior laminoplasty.  相似文献   

13.
【摘要】 目的:探讨微创前路经上位椎体椎间孔减压术治疗神经根型颈椎病的有效性。方法:2008年7月~2010年7月12例单侧神经根型颈椎病患者在延边大学医院接受微创前路经上位椎体椎间孔减压术。其中男7例,女5例,年龄为35~68岁,平均49岁。椎间孔狭窄部位:C5/6 4例,C6/7 5例,C7/T1 3例。软性髓核突出3例,钩椎关节骨质增生7例,突出的髓核钙化2例。均行前路手术,术中采用脊柱手术专用显微镜,在病变上位椎体确定钻孔起始部位,利用高速钻石气钻磨出一约6mm直径的通路达到病变区域,减压椎间孔。观察术前及末次随访时上肢放射性疼痛的VAS评分、颈椎功能障碍指数(NDI)及病变水平椎间盘高度。结果:手术时间为56~110min,平均86±6min;术中失血量为40~120ml,平均92±8ml。无椎动脉损伤、贺纳氏综合征、喉返神经损伤等并发症。术后随访时间为12~23个月,平均15.8±1.3个月。术前上肢疼痛VAS评分为8.5±0.5分(7~10分),末次随访时为1.4±0.2分(0~3分),两者比较有显著性差异(P<0.05);术前NDI为26.4±1.3分(22~31分),末次随访时为4.2±0.6分(3~8分),两者比较有显著性差异(P<0.05),改善率为84.1%;术前病变水平椎间盘高度为5.4±0.7mm(4.2~6.1mm),末次随访时为4.9±0.7mm(3.6~5.8mm),两者比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。术后满意度为100%。结论:微创前路经上位椎体椎间孔减压术可减少对椎间盘的损伤,是治疗单侧神经根型颈椎病的有效手术方法。  相似文献   

14.
15.
We present a novel method of performing an 'open-door' cervical laminoplasty. The complete laminotomy is sited on alternate sides at successive levels, thereby allowing the posterior arch to be elevated to alternate sides. Foraminotomies can be carried out on either side to relieve root compression. The midline structures are preserved. We undertook this procedure in 23 elderly patients with a spondylotic myelopathy. Each was assessed clinically and radiologically before and after their operation. Follow-up was for a minimum of three years (mean 4.5 years; 3 to 7). Using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system, the mean pre-operative score was 8.1 (6 to 10), which improved post-operatively to a mean of 12.7 (11 to 14). The mean percentage improvement was 61% (50% to 85.7%) after three years. The canal/vertebral body ratio improved from a mean of 0.65 (0.33 to 0.73) pre-operatively to 0.94 (0.5 to 1.07) postoperatively. Alternating cervical laminoplasty can be performed safely in elderly patients with minimal morbidity and good results.  相似文献   

16.
目的 对比前路颈椎椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与颈椎前路动态装置植入术(DCI)对单节段颈椎椎间盘突出症(CDH)患者颈椎活动度(ROM)及术后颈椎曲度的影响.方法 回顾性分析2018年6月—2019年9月海军军医大学长征医院收治的78例单节段CDH患者临床资料,其中42例采用ACDF治疗(ACDF组),36例采用DC...  相似文献   

17.
颈椎不稳在交感型颈椎病发病中的作用   总被引:18,自引:0,他引:18  
Yu Z  Liu Z  Dang G 《中华外科杂志》2002,40(12):881-883
目的:研究交感型颈椎病的病理因素及治疗方法。方法:回顾分析了1988-2000年收治的20例手术治疗的交感型颈椎病患者。根据术前及术后颈椎伸屈侧位X光片判断有无颈椎不稳。结果:20例患者术前均有颈椎不稳,颈椎不稳主要发生在C3-C4和C4-C5,颈椎高位硬膜外封闭对大部分患者有短期效果。每例患者均于不稳节段行颈前路融合术,手术有效率为90%。结论:颈椎不稳是导致交感型颈椎病发病的重要因素;颈椎高位硬膜外封闭可有短期疗效因此具有重要的诊断价值;颈椎前路植骨融合术是治疗交感型颈椎病的有效方法。  相似文献   

18.
Analysis of anterior cervical microforaminotomy performed at the North Staffordshire University Hospital along with a review of literature of this minimally invasive procedure is presented. METHODS: A retrospective-prospective study was performed on 34 patients (24 males, 10 females) with cervical disc disease who had been surgically treated with anterior cervical microforaminotomy between 1999 and 2005. Age ranged from 37 to 75. MRI findings were disc prolapse in 28 and additional osteophytes in six. Microforaminotomy was performed according to the published technique. RESULTS: Single level operations were performed in 22 patients (21 unilateral, 1 bilateral) and multi-level operations were performed in 12 patients (7 unilateral and 5 bilateral). The short-term outcomes were excellent in 65% (i.e., complete resolution of all symptoms), good in 29% (relief of radiculopathy but some non-radicular discomfort persists), and fair in 6% (mild residual radiculopathy with or without non-radicular symptoms). Postoperative complications include one patient with partial C6 root damage, which was identified intraoperatively, but had excellent results at 2 months post operation. Long-term follow-up (using the cervical spine research society questionnaire) ranged from 2-48 months. The average pain score, neurological outcome and functional outcome improved after this operation. RE-OPERATION: One patient, who had 2 level bilateral surgeries, needed discectomies with fusion for new onset myelopathy 18 months later. CONCLUSION: Appropriate patient selection is cardinal in achieving good outcome in anterior microforaminotomy.  相似文献   

19.

Background  

There were no studies in literature to compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous nucleoplasty (PCN) and percutaneous cervical discectomy (PCD) in contained cervical disc herniation.  相似文献   

20.
Postoperative instability of cervical OPLL and cervical radiculomyelopathy   总被引:6,自引:0,他引:6  
Y Kamioka  H Yamamoto  T Tani  K Ishida  T Sawamoto 《Spine》1989,14(11):1177-1183
The presence of cervical spine instability with respect to preoperative and postoperative changes in angular, horizontal, and rotational displacement of the vertebral body were studied. With the anterior approach, the instability in the remaining unfused segments, and their relation to the kyphotic or lordotic fused segment were studied. With the posterior approach, postoperative ROM (range of motion) could be better maintained, and horizontal displacement was improved in more cases by laminoplasty compared with laminectomy. With the anterior approach, the compensatory function for the loss of motion of the segments resulting from fusion was most remarkable at the levels of C2-3 and C6-7. In the alignment of the anterior fused segments, it appears important that the physiologic lordotic position be maintained.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号