Major depressive disorder with anger: a bipolar spectrum disorder?

BACKGROUND: Depression with anger may be more common in bipolar disorders. The aim of the study was to assess whether major depressive disorder (MDD) with anger could be included in the bipolar spectrum, by comparing it to MDD without anger and to bipolar II disorder. METHODS: Consecutive outpatients (281 bipolar II disorder and 202 MDD) presenting for major depressive episode (MDE) treatment were interviewed with the DSM-IV structured clinical interview. Clinical variables used to support the inclusion of MDD with anger in the bipolar spectrum were age of onset, many MDE recurrences, atypical features of depression, depressive mixed state (an MDE plus some concurrent hypomanic symptoms), and bipolar family history. RESULTS: Frequency of MDE with anger was 50.5% [61.2% in bipolar II, and 35.6% in MDD (z = 5.5, p = 0.0000, 95% CI 16.8-43.3%)]. Logistic regression of MDE with anger (dependent variable) versus bipolar variables showed that MDE with anger was significantly associated with all bipolar variables, apart from recurrences. MDD with anger, compared with MDD without anger, had significantly lower age of onset, more marked depressive mixed state, a bipolar family history with more cases, but comparable atypical features and Global Assessment of Functioning scores. MDD with anger, compared with bipolar II disorder, had significantly higher age of onset, less atypical features, and a bipolar family history with less cases. CONCLUSIONS: MDE with anger was common in outpatients (more in bipolar II disorder). MDD with anger may be midway between MDD without anger and bipolar II disorder, and might be included into the bipolar spectrum. However, MDD with anger does not appear to be associated with the often reported negative response to monotherapy with antidepressants.     

Prevalence and correlates of bipolar II disorder in major depressive patients at a psychiatric outpatient clinic in Hong Kong

BackgroundWestern studies indicate a high prevalence of bipolar II disorder defined by a Research Diagnostic Criteria 2-day hypomania duration criterion (30 to 61%) amongst clinically depressive patients. The situation in Chinese patients with depression is unknown.Methods64 (52.5% response rate) patients first presenting to a Hong Kong public psychiatric outpatient clinic in 2005 with a diagnosis of major depression were recruited. The SCID and Family History Screen were administered.ResultsDSM-IV bipolar II was found in 20.5% of depressive outpatients; 35.9% had bipolar II disorder defined by RDC 2-day duration criterion for hypomania. Family bipolarity, age of onset, and depressive recurrence distinguished bipolar II subjects from unipolar depressives irrespective of duration criteria chosen for hypomania.LimitationsSample size was limited.ConclusionsBipolar II disorder is common amongst Chinese depressive outpatients. The evaluation method and 2-day duration criterion for hypomania were supported by bipolar validators. Replication using larger samples is needed to arrive at a more representative prevalence estimate and to enable more refined nosological evaluation.     

Family history validation of the bipolar nature of depressive mixed states

BACKGROUND: Recent data indicate that depressive mixed states (DMX), major depressive episode (MDE) plus few concurrent hypomanic symptoms are common in clinical practice but omitted in DSM-IV. Our aims were to find the sensitivity and specificity of DMX for the diagnosis of bipolar II disorder, and validate it against familial bipolarity. METHODS: 377 consecutive private outpatients presenting with psychoactive drug-free MDE were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (Clinician Version). History of past hypomanic episodes and presence of hypomanic symptoms during the index MDE were systematically recorded. Of these, 226 were bipolar II and 151 unipolar. DMX3 was defined as an MDE plus three or more intra-episodic hypomanic symptoms. RESULTS: DMX3 was present in 58.4% of bipolar II, and 23.1% of unipolar patients. It was significantly associated with variables distinguishing bipolar from strictly defined unipolar disorders (younger age at onset, more MDE recurrence, more atypical features, more bipolar II family history). Unipolar DMX3 (MDE with documented hypomania solely intra-episodically) was not significantly different from bipolar II MDE on age at onset, atypical features, and bipolar II family history. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the inclusion of DMX3 (bipolar II and 'unipolar') into the bipolar spectrum. Adding the 23% of the UP-DMX3 to the roster of less-than-manic outpatient depressives will boost the rate of bipolarity in this outpatient depressive population to a respectable 70%, the highest rate yet reported for the bipolar spectrum below the threshold of mania.     

Early-onset versus late-onset atypical depression: unipolar and bipolar II

BACKGROUND: To find differences between early- and late-onset atypical depression (AD). METHODS: 211 unipolar/bipolar II AD outpatients, interviewed with DSM-IV Structured Clinical Interview and depression rating scales. Logistic regression was used. RESULTS: Early-onset AD was significantly associated with age, female gender, duration of illness, recurrences, chronicity, MADRS, bipolar II and unipolar. Early-onset bipolar II AD was significantly associated with age, female gender, duration of illness, recurrences and chronicity. Early-onset unipolar AD was significantly associated with age. Limitations: Age at onset recall bias, single interviewer, non-blind, cross-sectional assessment, bipolar II diagnosis reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar II AD is more likely to be chronic if early onset.     

The prevalence and clinical correlates of anger attacks during depressive episodes in bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND: Anger attacks, characterized by sudden episodes of intense anger with autonomic arousal, have been described in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). This study compared the prevalence and clinical significance of anger attacks in unipolar versus bipolar depression. METHODS: Using the questionnaire of Fava et al. [Psychopharmacol. Bull. 27(3) (1991) 275-279], we assessed rates of anger attacks among outpatients with MDD (n=50) or bipolar disorder (BPD) (n=29) who were currently in a pure depressive episode. RESULTS: Anger attacks were significantly more common among bipolar (62%) than unipolar (26%) depressed individuals. In a multiple logistic regression, the presence of anger attacks emerged as a significant predictor of bipolarity. LIMITATIONS: This preliminary finding should be confirmed in a larger sample. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that anger attacks may be a common feature of bipolar depression.     

Delineating bipolar II mixed states in the Ravenna-San Diego collaborative study: the relative prevalence and diagnostic significance of hypomanic features during major depressive episodes

BACKGROUND: Depressive mixed state (DMX), defined by hypomanic features during a major depressive episode (MDE) is under-researched. Accordingly, study aims were to find DMX prevalence in unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar II depressive phase, to delineate the most common hypomanic signs and symptoms during DMX, and to assess their sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of DMX and bipolar II. METHODS: 161 unipolar and bipolar II MDE psychotropic drug- and substance-free consecutive outpatients were interviewed during an MDE with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. DMX was defined at two threshold levels as an MDE with two or more (DMX2), and with three or more (DMX3) simultaneous intra-episode hypomanic signs and symptoms. RESULTS: DMX2 was present in 73.1% of bipolar II, and in 42.1% of unipolar MDD (P<0.000); DMX3 was present in 46.3% of bipolar II, and in 7.8% of unipolar MDD (P<0.000). The most common hypomanic manifestations during MDE were irritability, distractibility, and racing thoughts. Irritability had the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of DMX2 and DMX3. Various combinations of irritability, distractibility, and racing thoughts correctly classified the highest number of DMX2 and DMX3, and had the strongest predictive power. DMX2 had high sensitivity and low specificity for bipolar II, whereas DMX3 had low sensitivity (46.3%) and high specificity (92.1%). LIMITATIONS: Single interviewer, cross-sectional assessment, and interviewing clinician not blind to patients' unipolar vs. bipolar status. CONCLUSIONS: When conservatively defined (>or = 3 intra-episode hypomanic signs and symptoms during MDE), DMX is prevalent in the natural history of bipolar II but uncommon in unipolar MDD. These findings have treatment implications, because of growing concerns that antidepressants may worsen DMX, which in turn may respond better to mood stabilizers. These data also have methodological implications for diagnostic practice: rather than solely depending on the vagaries of the patient's memory for past hypomanic episodes, the search for hypomanic features--ostensibly elation would not be one of those--during an index depressive episode could enhance the detection of bipolar II in otherwise pseudo-unipolar patients. Strict adherence to current clinical diagnostic interview instruments (e.g. the SCID) would make such detection difficult, if not impossible.     

Bipolar versus unipolar psychotic outpatient depression.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between bipolar and unipolar psychotic depression has not been well studied. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare bipolar with unipolar psychotic outpatient depression. METHODS: Seventy consecutive unipolar (n = 40) and bipolar (n = 30) psychotic depressed outpatients were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. RESULTS: Of the variables studied (age, duration of illness, severity, recurrences, atypical features, chronicity, gender, comorbidity, hallucinations, delusions), none was significantly different between unipolar and bipolar psychotic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar psychotic depression was similar to unipolar psychotic depression on variables reported in the literature to distinguish bipolar from unipolar disorder. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The findings might suggest, but do not necessarily imply, that psychotic depression might be a distinct clinical entity. LIMITATIONS: Single interviewer, nonblind cross-sectional assessment, outpatient sample, sample size.     

Bipolar mood disorders among Polish psychiatric outpatients treated for major depression

BACKGROUND: Significant proportion of patients treated for depression may have various types of bipolar mood disorders. The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of bipolar disorders among outpatients having at least one major depressive episode, treated by 96 psychiatrists, representing all regions of Poland. METHODS: The study included 880 patients (237 male, 643 female), identified to following diagnostic categories: bipolar I, bipolar II, bipolar spectrum disorder and major depressive disorder. RESULTS: Bipolar mood disorders were found in 61.2% of patients studied, bipolar I more frequent in men and bipolar II in women, and bipolar spectrum in 12% of patients. Patients with age ranges 19-49 and 50-65 years did not differ as to the percentage of diagnostic categories. Patients with bipolar mood disorders compared to major depressive disorder had significantly more frequent family history of bipolar disorder, premorbid hyper- or cyclothymic personality, early onset of depression, symptoms of hypersomnia and hyperphagia, psychotic depression, post-partum depression, and treatment-resistant depression. Bipolar spectrum patients had most clinical features similar to classic types of bipolar disorders. LIMITATIONS: Neither structured interview for family history, nor formal criteria for a number of clinical manifestations were used. The population treated by psychiatrists may not be representative and present a subgroup with more severe mood disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar mood disorders may be very prevalent among depressive outpatients treated by psychiatrists in Poland, which is confirmed by the results of recent studies. Bipolar patients (including bipolar spectrum) significantly differ from major depressive disorder as to numerous clinical features related mostly to depressive episode.     

Bipolar II depression in late life: prevalence and clinical features in 525 depressed outpatients

BACKGROUND: Late-life bipolar II depression has not been well studied. The aim of the present study was to find the prevalence of late-life (50 years or more) bipolar II depression among unipolar and bipolar depressed outpatients, and to compare it with bipolar II depression in younger patients, looking for differences supporting the subtyping of bipolar II depression according to age at onset. METHODS: Consecutive 525 patients presenting for treatment of a major depressive episode were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. RESULTS: Among patients less than 50 years, 53.4% had bipolar II depression. Among patients 50 years or more, 32.9% had bipolar II depression (significant difference). Atypical features were present in 60.9% of bipolar II patients less than 50 years, and in 26.1% of those 50 years or more (significant difference). Bipolar II patients 50 years or more had significantly higher age at onset than those less than 50 years. Bipolar II and unipolar patients 50 years or more were not significantly different, apart from comorbidity. Bipolar II patients less than 50 years had significantly more atypical features than unipolar ones. LIMITATIONS: Single interviewer, single nonblind assessment, cross-sectional assessment, exclusion of substance abuse and severe personality disorder patients, comorbidity not systematically assessed, modification of DSM-IV duration criterion for hypomania. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that bipolar II depression and atypical features are less common in late life. Differences in age at onset and atypical features support the subtyping of bipolar II depression according to age at onset.     

Psychosocial impairment associated with bipolar II disorder

BACKGROUND: Significant research has looked at the psychosocial impairment associated with bipolar I disorder and major depressive disorder. Far less is known about the impact of bipolar II disorder. The present study assessed the social and work impairment associated with bipolar II disorder and whether these are more or less severe than those associated with bipolar I disorder or major depressive disorder. METHODS: Psychiatric outpatients with bipolar II disorder (n=89), bipolar I disorder (n=45) and major depressive disorder (n=1251) were assessed cross-sectionally by highly trained raters using semi-structured interviews. Participants were in a major depressive episode. Groups were compared on a series of indicators of psychosocial functioning. RESULTS: Bipolar I and II disorder were associated with greater absenteeism from work due to psychopathology compared to major depressive disorder. The bipolar disorders also had higher rates of hospitalization and suicide attempts. Bipolar II disorder had fewer hospitalization than bipolar I disorder which may have led to slightly less severe work impairment. Both conditions had similar rates of serious suicide attempts. LIMITATIONS: The study was cross-sectional and retrospective. Furthermore, the sample consisted of outpatients seeking treatment, limiting generalizability to other settings. CONCLUSION: Bipolar II disorder is associated with serious work impairment and a high number of serious suicide attempts. The level of impairment is more similar than it is different from that associated with bipolar I disorder. Clinicians would be mistaken to presume that the "softer" bipolar spectrum, specifically bipolar II disorder, is less impairing than bipolar I disorder.     

Evaluating the inter-episode stability of depressive mixed states

BACKGROUND: Depressive mixed state (DMX) is understudied, although this diagnostic concept may be of clinical and theoretical importance. Our goal was to provide preliminary evidence of the inter-episode stability of DMX. The inter-episode stability is known to be an important validator for establishing a distinct clinical entity. METHODS: Out of depressive patients consecutively hospitalized at our institute, those who experienced two or more hospitalizations due to discrete depressive recurrences during a 6-year period were selected. All depressive episodes were directly observed and assessed using a standardized rating instrument in terms of eight intra-episode manic symptoms (flight of idea, logorrhea, aggression, excessive social contact, increased drive, irritability, racing thoughts, and distractibility). Assessments for subsequent episodes were performed blindly to those for previous episodes within each patient. RESULTS: The inter-episode stability of categorical DMX diagnoses and the number of intra-episode manic symptoms was moderate but significantly high. Approximately 50% of patients with DMX in the index episode obtained a DMX diagnosis in the second episode. Approximately 40% of the total variance of the number of intra-episode manic symptoms was explained by agreements across several depressive episodes. Depressive patients who experienced a diagnostic switch from unipolar to bipolar disorder had a higher frequency of DMX and a greater number of intra-episode manic symptoms in the index as well as subsequent episodes. LIMITATIONS: All consecutive patients were not followed up. Bipolar I and II patients were combined due to a small number of bipolar II patients in this sample. CONCLUSION: The inter-episode stability of DMX may not be so high as is required for establishing a distinct clinical entity. However, the findings strongly suggest that some depressive patients have a long-lasting liability to DMX. It is important to determine whether such a liability to DMX is mediated by affective temperaments, as was originally hypothesized by Akiskal [J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 16 (1996) 4S-14S]. DMX may be a risk factor to the diagnostic switch from unipolar to bipolar disorder.     

Female depression before and after menopause

BACKGROUND: There is no clear association between menopause and depression. Aim of the study was to compare female depression with onset before menopause with female depression with onset after menopause, to find out if endocrinological changes had an impact on depression. METHODS: Five hundred and twelve consecutive unipolar and bipolar I/II depressed outpatients were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Global Assessment of Functioning scale. Patients were divided into patients with depression/mania onset before 40 and after 40. RESULTS: Female depression with onset after 40 had a significantly shorter duration of illness, fewer recurrences, fewer patients with atypical features, fewer bipolar II patients and more unipolar patients than female depression with onset before 40. Male depression with onset after 40 had a significantly shorter duration of illness and fewer patients with atypical features than male depression with onset before 40. CONCLUSIONS: Some features were common to both female and male depression with onset after 40. Female depression with onset after 40 had significantly more unipolar and fewer bipolar II patients, than female depression with onset before 40. Different frequency of unipolar and bipolar II patients suggests that the biology of depression in menopause women may be different from that of women not in menopause, and from that of male depression with onset after 40. Differences may be related to menopause.     

Self-reported data from patients with bipolar disorder: frequency of brief depression

OBJECTIVE: Patients with bipolar disorder often report depressive symptoms that do not meet the DSM-IV criteria for an episode. Using daily self-reported mood ratings, we studied how changing the length requirement to that typical of recurrent brief depression (2-4 days) would impact the number of depressed episodes. METHOD: 203 patients (135 bipolar I and 68 bipolar II by DSM-IV criteria) recorded mood daily using ChronoRecord software on a home computer (30,348 total days; mean 150 days). Episodes of depression and days of depression outside of episodes were determined. Symptom intensity (mild versus moderate or severe) was investigated within and outside of depressive episodes. RESULTS: Decreasing the minimum duration criterion for an episode of depression to 2 days increased the number of patients with a depressed episode two and a half times (52 to 131), and quadrupled both the number of depressed episodes per patient (0.62 to 2.88) and the number of depressed episodes for all patients (125 to 584). With a 2-day episode length, 34% of days of depression remained outside an episode. The ratio of days with severe symptoms within episodes remained consistent (about 25%) in spite of decreasing the episode length to 2 days. Considering only days with severe symptoms, about 25% remained outside of episodes even with a 2-day length. None of the results distinguished bipolar I from bipolar II disorder. LIMITATIONS: Self-reported data, computer access required, relatively short study length, no control group. CONCLUSION: Brief depressive episodes and single days of depression outside of episodes occur frequently in both bipolar I and bipolar II disorder. Moderate or severe symptoms occur during brief episodes at a ratio similar to that for episodes that meet the DSM-IV criteria.     

Anxiety disorders comorbidity in bipolar I, bipolar II and unipolar major depression: results from a population-based study in Hungary

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the lifetime comorbidity between DSM-III-R anxiety disorders in separate subgroups of patients with major depression, bipolar II and bipolar I disorder in a community sample of a Hungarian population. METHODS: Randomly selected subjects (aged between 18 and 64 years, N=2953) were interviewed by the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) which generated DSM-III-R diagnoses. RESULTS: The prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder, agoraphobia and simple phobia was the highest among bipolar II patients (20.8, 37.5 and 16.7%, respectively), social phobia was most prevalent in (nonbipolar) major depression (17.6%), while the rate of panic disorder was the same in the (nonbipolar) major depressive and bipolar II subgroups (12.4 and 12.5%, respectively). Bipolar I patients showed a relatively low rate of comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support previous results on the particularly high rate of lifetime comorbidity between anxiety disorders and unipolar major depression and particularly bipolar II illness. LIMITATIONS: Underestimation of the prevalence of bipolar II disorder by the diagnostic methodology used, resulting in a small number of bipolar II cases, lack of analysis of data by gender, no data on obsessive-compulsive disorder.     

The close link between suicide attempts and mixed (bipolar) depression: implications for suicide prevention

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have shown a significant relationship between suicide ideation and mixed depression. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence and clinical characteristics of mixed depression among non-violent suicide attempters. METHODS: Using a structured interview (modified Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview) and assessing all the symptoms of 16 psychiatric diagnoses, the authors examined 100 consecutive nonviolent suicide attempters (aged 18-65) within 24 h after their attempts. Mixed depression was defined as a major depressive episode (MDE)/dysthymic disorder plus 3 or more co-occurring hypomanic symptoms, according to the definition validated by Akiskal and Benazzi [Akiskal, H.S., Benazzi, F., 2003a. Delineating depressive mixed states: Their therapeutic significance. Clin. Approaches Bipolar Disord. 2, 41-47, Akiskal, H.S., Benazzi, F., 2003b. Family history validation of the bipolar nature of depressive mixed states. J. Affect. Disord. 73, 113-122.]. RESULTS: Current mixed depression was present in 63.0% in the total sample, and in 70.8% among the 89 depressive suicide attempters. Irritability, distractibility and psychomotor agitation were present in more than 90% of the subjects with mixed depression. The rate of mixed depression was significantly higher among bipolar than non-bipolar depressive suicide attempters (90% vs. 62%). Patients with mixed depression had the following concurrent disorders: bipolar disorders 41.0%, panic disorder 30.0%, generalized anxiety disorder 89.0%, alcohol abuse/dependence 56.0%, and substance abuse 27.0%. Mixed depression versus non-mixed depression had the following significant associations (odds ratio=OR): females 2.4, bipolar II disorder 9.3, generalized anxiety disorder 41.3, irritability 101.6 and psychomotor agitation 61.1. LIMITATIONS: The study didn't include suicide attempters with very high risk of fatality. CONCLUSIONS: The important new finding of this study is the very high prevalence of mixed depression among depressed suicide attempters. The rates of mixed depression among bipolar and non-bipolar depressive suicide attempters were much higher than previously reported among nonsuicidal bipolar II and unipolar depressive outpatients, suggesting that suicide attempters come mainly from mixed depressives with predominantly bipolar II base. Irritability and psychomotor agitation were the strongest predictors of suicide attempt. From a public health standpoint, our data highlight the necessity of detecting and treating mixed (bipolar) depression in the prevention of suicidal behaviour.     

Suicide in subtypes of primary major depression

Among 100 consecutive suicide victims with primary major depression at the time of their suicide, 46% were found to have had bipolar II depression, 1% bipolar I disorder and 53% non-bipolar major depression. Since the lifetime prevalence rates of bipolar II and bipolar I depressions are relatively low compared to primary major non-bipolar depression, the present findings suggest that bipolar II disorder gives a particularly high risk of suicide among the different subtypes of primary major affective illness. Fifty-nine percent of the patients had medical contact during the depressive episode, but the depression was frequently undiagnosed, untreated or undertreated. The implications of these findings for suicide prevention are discussed briefly.     

Re-evaluating the prevalence of and diagnostic composition within the broad clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders

Until recently it was believed that no more than 1% of the general population has bipolar disorder. Emerging transatlantic data are beginning to provide converging evidence for a higher prevalence of up to at least 5%. Manic states, even those with mood-incongruent features, as well as mixed (dysphoric) mania, are now formally included in both ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Mixed states occur in an average of 40% of bipolar patients over a lifetime; current evidence supports a broader definition of mixed states consisting of full-blown mania with two or more concomitant depressive symptoms. The largest increase in prevalence rates, however, is accounted for by 'softer' clinical expressions of bipolarity situated between the extremes of full-blown bipolar disorder where the person has at least one manic episode (bipolar I) and strictly defined unipolar major depressive disorder without personal or family history for excited periods. Bipolar II is the prototype for these intermediary conditions with major depressions and history of spontaneous hypomanic episodes; current evidence indicates that most hypomanias pursue a recurrent course and that their usual duration is 1-3 days, falling below the arbitrary 4-day cutoff required in DSM-IV. Depressions with antidepressant-associated hypomania (sometimes referred to as bipolar III) also appear, on the basis of extensive international research neglected by both ICD-10 and DSM-IV, to belong to the clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders. Broadly defined, the bipolar spectrum in studies conducted during the last decade accounts for 30-55% of all major depressions. Rapid-cycling, defined as alternation of depressive and excited (at least four per year), more often arise from a bipolar II than a bipolar I baseline; such cycling does not in the main appear to be a distinct clinical subtype - but rather a transient complication in 20% in the long-term course of bipolar disorder. Major depressions superimposed on cyclothymic oscillations represent a more severe variant of bipolar II, often mistaken for borderline or other personality disorders in the dramatic cluster. Moreover, atypical depressive features with reversed vegetative signs, anxiety states, as well as alcohol and substance abuse comorbidity, is common in these and other bipolar patients. The proper recognition of the entire clinical spectrum of bipolarity behind such 'masks' has important implications for psychiatric research and practice. Conditions which require further investigation include: (1) major depressive episodes where hyperthymic traits - lifelong hypomanic features without discrete hypomanic episodes - dominate the intermorbid or premorbid phases; and (2) depressive mixed states consisting of few hypomanic symptoms (i.e., racing thoughts, sexual arousal) during full-blown major depressive episodes - included in Kraepelin's schema of mixed states, but excluded by DSM-IV. These do not exhaust all potential diagnostic entities for possible inclusion in the clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders: the present review did not consider cyclic, seasonal, irritable-dysphoric or otherwise impulse-ridden, intermittently explosive or agitated psychiatric conditions for which the bipolar connection is less established. The concept of bipolar spectrum as used herein denotes overlapping clinical expressions, without necessarily implying underlying genetic homogeneity. In the course of the illness of the same patient, one often observes the varied manifestations described above - whether they be formal diagnostic categories or those which have remained outside the official nosology. Some form of life charting of illness with colored graphic representation of episodes, stressors, and treatments received can be used to document the uniquely varied course characteristic of each patient, thereby greatly enhancing clinical evaluation.     

The perception of emotional chimeric faces in patients with depression,mania and unilateral brain damage

BACKGROUND: Judgements made on chimeric faces elicit reliably a perceptual bias to the left hemispace, presumed to be due to right hemisphere dominance for emotional processes. Major depressive illness has been shown to attenuate this bias. The aim of this work was to examine lateral perceptual bias in bipolar I and II patients in a hypomanic state and unipolar depressed patients and those with unilateral hemisphere damage following stroke. METHOD: Sixty patients with DSM-IV affective disorder (30 bipolar I or II, currently hypomanic, 30 unipolar depressives), 30 right brain-damaged patients, 30 left brain-damaged patients and 30 healthy controls were given the Happy-Sad Chimeric Faces Test. RESULTS: Right hemisphere damaged and unipolar depressed patients both showed a significantly reduced left hemispatial bias (LHB) compared to controls, bipolars and left brain-damaged patients. No significant difference in mean LHB between controls and both hypomanics and left brain-damaged patients was found. There was no significant association between LHB and clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest a physiological distinction between bipolar and unipolar depression. The significantly diminished left hemifacial bias in depressed patients suggests right hemisphere dysfunction.     

Suicidal behaviour during different phases of bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND: There are no previous studies comparing the prevalence and risk factors for suicidal behaviour during different phases of bipolar disorder. METHODS: In the Jorvi Bipolar Study (JoBS), 1630 psychiatric in- and outpatients were screened for bipolar disorders with the Mood Disorder Questionnaire. Using SCID I and II interviews, 191 patients were diagnosed with bipolar disorders (90 bipolar I, 101 bipolar II). Suicidal ideation was measured using the Scale for Suicidal Ideation (SSI). Prevalence and risk factors for ideation and attempts during different phases (depressive, mixed, depressive mixed and hypomanic/manic phases) were investigated. RESULTS: There were marked differences between phases regarding suicide attempts and level of suicidal ideation. Hopelessness predicted suicidal behaviour during the depressive phase, whereas a subjective rating of severity of depression and younger age predicted suicide attempts during mixed phases. LIMITATIONS: The relatively small sample size in some phases. CONCLUSIONS: Suicidal behaviour varied markedly between different phases of BD. Suicide attempts and suicidal ideation were related to phases which are associated with depressive aspects of the illness. Hopelessness and severity of depression were key indicators of risk in all phases.     

A systematic review of manic and depressive prodromes

BACKGROUND: This paper explores whether individuals with a mood disorder can identify the nature and duration of depressive and manic prodromes. METHODS: Seventy-three publications of prodromal symptoms in bipolar and unipolar disorders were identified by computer searches of seven databases (including MEDLINE and PsycLIT) supplemented by hand searches of journals. Seventeen studies (total sample=1191 subjects) met criteria for inclusion in a systematic review. RESULTS: At least 80% of individuals with a mood disorder can identify one or more prodromal symptoms. There are limited data about unipolar disorders. In bipolar disorders, early symptoms of mania are identified more frequently than early symptoms of depression. The most robust early symptom of mania is sleep disturbance (median prevalence 77%). Early symptoms of depression are inconsistent. The mean length of manic prodromes (>20 days) was consistently reported to be longer than depressive prodromes (<19 days). However, depressive prodromes showed greater inter-individual variation (ranging from 2 to 365 days) in duration than manic prodromes (1-120 days). LIMITATIONS: Few prospective studies of bipolar, and particularly unipolar disorders have been reported. CONCLUSIONS: Early symptoms of relapse in affective disorders can be identified. Explanations of the apparent differences in the recognition and length of prodromes between mania and bipolar depression are explored. Further research on duration, sequence of symptom appearance and characteristics of prodromes is warranted to clarify the clinical usefulness of early symptom monitoring.