Renal transplantation of patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis

A retrospective review of patients transplanted from peritoneal dialysis was performed to assess the risk of this form of dialysis for patients awaiting renal transplantation. Eighteen transplants have been performed in 16 patients, ages 6 to 57 years, undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis over the past 4 years. Sixteen were from cadaver donors, and two were from living related donors (LRD). The patients had been undergoing intermittent peritoneal dialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) using permanent silastic catheters, from five days to 4 years. No patient had clinical evidence for peritonitis at the time of transplantation. The peritoneal catheter was removed at the time of transplant in all cadaver donor recipients without complication. One recipient of a LRD kidney had the catheter removed two days prior to transplant. Cultures of the catheter were sterile in 16 cases. Two patients had positive peritoneal catheter cultures at the time of transplant but were treated with appropriate antibiotics and never developed clinical peritonitis. Fourteen transplants had postoperative fevers. No definite source was found in 13; one had fever in relation to acute graft rejection. The fevers resolved in all patients either spontaneously or subsequent to therapy. Other complications were similar to those seen in patients transplanted from hemodialysis. Hemodialysis was performed as needed pretransplant and posttransplant using a temporary femoral vein catheter or arteriovenous fistula without complication. Nine patients are alive with a functioning kidney 1 to 36 months posttransplant (mean 17 months). Six transplants rejected (five patients), and one failed secondary to renal vein thrombosis. Two patients died posttransplant, one after a cerebrovascular accident, and one due to an unknown cause 1 month postnephrectomy for rejection. In conclusion, patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis can be successfully transplanted without a significant incidence of complications related to their peritoneal dialysis.     

Catheter infections as a factor in the transfer of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients to hemodialysis

The effect of peritoneal catheter infections on the transfer of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients to hemodialysis over a 9-year period were examined. Twenty-seven percent (68/247) of all patients were transferred permanently to hemodialysis after a mean of 15 +/- 14 months of CAPD. An additional 29% transferred temporarily one or more times during the study period (mean time of peritoneal dialysis, 35 +/- 23 months). The reasons for permanent transfer to hemodialysis were catheter infections (15/68, 22%), peritonitis (13/68, 19%), catheter infections associated with peritonitis (10/68, 15%), patient preference (9/68, 13%), mechanical problems (4/68, 6%), noncompliance (7/68, 10%), inadequate clearance or ultrafiltration (6/68, 9%), with other reasons for the remainder (4/68, 6%). Temporary transfers to hemodialysis were also mainly due to catheter infections (32%), peritonitis (23%), and simultaneous catheter infections and peritonitis (24%). Catheter infection rates were much higher in the groups that permanently and temporarily were transferred to hemodialysis in comparison with those patients who remained on peritoneal dialysis. We conclude that catheter infections are a leading cause of both temporary and permanent transfer of CAPD patients to hemodialysis.     

Temporary vascular access for first dialysis is common, undesirable and usually avoidable

BACKGROUND: When technically feasible, patients with end-stage renal failure should commence regular dialysis treatment with permanent access to the circulation (by arteriovenous fistula) or peritoneum (by soft peritoneal catheter) in situ, thus avoiding the need for initial hemodialysis employing temporary vascular access. We have examined the frequency, consequences and avoidability of temporary access in such patients. METHODS: 178 patients commencing regular dialysis between August 1993 and April 1995 were analysed retrospectively using case notes. Patients were divided into those who had permanent dialysis access in situ when they commenced dialysis and those who required temporary access. If temporary access was required, the patients were further analysed into those who had been first seen by a nephrologist at least 12 weeks before the first dialysis, and those who had been referred "late". It was assumed that 12 weeks was sufficient time for permanent access to be instituted. Mortality within the first 90 days of commencing dialysis was recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-four of 82 patients opting for regular hemodialysis and 53 of 96 opting for peritoneal dialysis required temporary vascular access. Late referral accounted for 47 and delays within the renal service for 35 of such patients. Late presentation to the medical profession or indecisiveness on the part of the patient accounted for the remainder. Twenty-five of 127 patients requiring temporary access but only one or 51 patients not requiring it died within 90 days of commencement of treatment. CONCLUSION: Late presentation to a renal unit prior to first dialysis is associated with increased mortality. Late referral or late presentation are associated with an increased need for temporary vascular access for first dialysis. Many patients who require temporary access for first dialysis could have been better managed.     

The surgeon's role in chronic peritoneal dialysis

Hemodialysis has been the mainstay for children with end-stage renal disease until a successful renal transplant is accomplished. Chronic peritoneal dialysis has been a second choice and, in special circumstances such as for small infants, children without vascular access, or patients unstable on hemodialysis, it is the only alternative. Recent refinements in peritoneal catheters and dialysis have added to the many medical, psychological, and economic advantages, resulting in the displacement of hemodialysis by peritoneal dialysis as the most frequently used modality. Forty-six patients were followed for 593 catheter months on peritoneal dialysis. A total of 74 procedures were performed, and 56 catheters were implanted. Complications included infection and mechanical occlusion of the catheter. Peritonitis occurred in 13 of the 46 patients on 56 separate occasions. There were 5 episodes of subcutaneous catheter infection. The peritonitis was treated with medical therapy alone in 50 of the 56 episodes of peritonitis. Mechanical occlusion in 10 patients and remedial surgery was required in 9. Of the total series, 4 patients were returned to hemodialysis and 5 patients died. Based on this experience we have developed guidelines to assist the surgeon in preventing and treating the various complications associated with chronic peritoneal dialysis.     

Renal transplantation in patients with indwelling continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheters

Controversy exists regarding management of the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter in patients undergoing renal transplantation. We performed 30 transplants (23 cadaveric and 7 living related) in 27 patients with indwelling continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheters. Dialysis was necessary in the immediate post-transplantation period in 9 of 30 patients (30 per cent). Of these 9 patients 3 had temporary hemodialysis and 6 resumed continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis with the indwelling catheter. Two postoperative complications clearly were related to the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter: 1 patient required abdominal exploration for control of bleeding related to disruption of peritoneal adhesions at the time the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter was removed and 1 suffered an abscess at the catheter site 1 month after the catheter was removed. No patient experienced peritonitis during immunosuppression after transplantation. We support leaving the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter during and after transplantation to simplify pre-transplantation patient care and to avoid the possible need for temporary post-transplantation hemodialysis in many patients.     

The Impact of the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative Guidelines on the Care of the Pediatric End-Stage Renal Disease Patient

The National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-DOQI) Guidelines for hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis adequacy, management of vascular access, and management of anemia are based primarily on evidence derived from the experience of adult dialysis patients. However, these Guidelines can also be used to improve the care of children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Some of the guidelines are directly applicable to pediatric dialysis patients, such as the preferential use of the internal jugular vein for placement of a central venous catheter for dialysis. Other Guidelines, such as targets for adequacy of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, serve as minimal standards of care for children with little supporting data specific to pediatrics. The importance of early referral and proactive care for children and adults with chronic renal failure is emphasized in all of the Guidelines. Optimum care should include early discussion of transplantation and choice of dialysis modality, preservation of sites for future vascular access, and early attention to anemia and nutrition. Clinical algorithms should be developed to implement the current Guidelines while data are generated to support modification of any of the recommendations for children.     

Serum matrix metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-3 levels in dialysis patients vary independently of CRP and IL-6 levels

BACKGROUND: Patients on chronic hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis often develop an inflammatory state that causes morbidity and mortality. Cross-sectional studies of dialysis patients have determined that C-reactive protein (CRP) is a predictor of morbidity. Little is known as to whether CRP, cytokines, such as IL-6 and IL-1beta that stimulate the synthesis of CRP, or matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are markers of inflammation in patients on dialysis. METHODS: We assayed by ELISA serum levels of MMP-2, MMP-3, IL-6 and CRP in healthy individuals and in patients with pre-end-stage renal disease (pESRD, n = 10), peritoneal dialysis (PD, n = 11), hemodialysis (HD, n = 17) and renal transplant (TX, n = 10). RESULTS: MMP-2 was significantly elevated before dialysis, perhaps indicative of progressive chronic renal sclerosis. MMP-3 was markedly elevated in hemodialysis patients but not in pESRD or PD patients, and may be related to the hemodialysis process and/or accelerated atherogenesis in these patients. IL-6 was significantly elevated in all patient groups, including pESRD patients. There were no statistically significant differences in CRP levels among the study groups. CRP correlated with IL-6, but not with MMP-2 or MMP-3. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that there are measurable differences in the expression of MMPs within the dialysis patient population. Because dialysis can be associated with local and systemic inflammation, increased levels of MMP-3 in the hemodialysis group may be a reflection of gene stimulation induced by inflammatory cytokines and should be considered as a marker of chronic, local inflammation.     

Pancreatitis: an important cause of abdominal symptoms in patients on peritoneal dialysis

In an eight-month period, four patients in our peritoneal dialysis program developed acute pancreatitis, an incidence significantly higher than that in our hemodialysis program. Diagnosis was difficult since the symptoms of pancreatitis were similar to those of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis. Further difficulties in diagnosis were due to unreliability of serum amylase levels and "routine" ultrasound examinations in suggesting the presence of pancreatitis. Computerized tomography performed in three patients showed enlarged, edematous pancreata with large extrapancreatic fluid collections in all cases. Two patients died, one directly due to complications of pancreatitis. One patient was changed to hemodialysis and showed clinical and radiologic resolution of his pancreatitis. One patient remains on peritoneal dialysis but has now had four attacks of acute pancreatitis. No patient had classic risk factors for development of pancreatitis. Review of patient histories showed no common historical factors except for renal failure itself, peritoneal dialysis, peritonitis, catheter surgery, and hypoproteinemia. It is possible that metabolic abnormalities related to absorption of glucose and buffer from dialysate or absorption of a toxic substance present in dialysate, bags, or tubing can cause pancreatitis in patients on peritoneal dialysis. We feel that a diagnosis of pancreatitis should be considered when peritoneal dialysis patients present with abdominal pain, particularly if peritoneal fluid cultures are negative or if patients with positive cultures do not have prompt resolution of symptoms with appropriate antibiotic therapy.     

Feasibility of resuming peritoneal dialysis after severe peritonitis and Tenckhoff catheter removal

Published guidelines suggest that after an episode of severe peritonitis that requires Tenckhoff catheter removal, peritoneal dialysis can be resumed after a minimum of 3 wk. However, the feasibility of resuming peritoneal dialysis after Tenckhoff catheter removal remains unknown. One hundred patients were identified with peritonitis that did not respond to standard antibiotic therapy in a specific center. Their clinical course was reviewed; in all of them, Tenckhoff catheters were removed and reinsertion was attempted at least 4 wk later. In 51 patients, the Tenckhoff catheter was successfully reinserted and peritoneal dialysis was resumed (success group). In the other 49 patients, reinsertion failed and the patient was put on long-term hemodialysis (fail group). The patients were followed for 18.5 +/- 16.8 mo. The overall technique survival was 30.8% at 24 mo. In the success group, 11 patients were changed to long-term hemodialysis within 8 mo after their return to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. In the fail group, 18 of the 20 deaths occurred within 12 mo after conversion to long-term hemodialysis. After resuming peritoneal dialysis, there was a significant decline in net ultrafiltration volume (0.38 +/- 0.16 to 0.21 +/- 0.19 L; P = 0.03) and a trend of rise in dialysate-to-plasma ratios of creatinine at 4 h (0.664 +/- 0.095 to 0.725 +/- 0.095; P = 0.15). Forty-five patients (88.2%) required additional dialysis exchanges or hypertonic dialysate to compensate for the loss of solute clearance or ultrafiltration, although there was no significant change in dialysis adequacy or nutritional status. It was concluded that after an episode of severe peritonitis that required Tenckhoff catheter removal, only a small group of patients could return to peritoneal dialysis. An early assessment of peritoneal function after Tenckhoff catheter reinsertion may be valuable.     

Peritoneal dialysis in infants and children

Pediatric renal failure patients can be restored to health with peritoneal dialysis more easily, more comfortably, and more safely than with hemodialysis. During the past 3.5 years, we have treated 22 children with either acute (less than 30 days) or chronic (greater than 30 days) peritoneal dialysis (PD) at Henrietta Egleston Hospital for Children. They ranged in age from 2 weeks to 15 1/6 years, mean 5.2 years. The indications for acute dialysis were renal failure following cardiac surgery (4); hemolytic-uremic syndrome (4); and renal failure associated with bromide intoxication (1), congenital urethral stricture (1), or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (1). Chronic dialysis was utilized for end-stage renal disease caused by glomerulonephritis (5), chronic infection (2), hemolytic-uremic syndrome (1), cystinosis (1), congenital renal artery stenosis (1), and unknown etiology (1). Thirty-four adult or pediatric Tenckhoff catheters were utilized to deliver PD for from 6 to 551 days (18 months). Pediatric Tenckhoff catheters must be pre-measured in order to have the Dacron cuffs glued to the appropriate position on the catheter (7-12 cm from the end) to fit the child. There were seven catheter-related infections in four patients; three required catheter revision and four were treated medically. There were eight catheter-related mechanical problems, all of which required re-operation. All of those on chronic PD and seven of those on acute PD survived for an overall survival of 82 per cent. All surviving patients have been restored to health either by recovery of renal function (6 patients), renal transplantation (8 patients), or maintenance of chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (4 patients).     

Body mass index, dialysis modality, and survival: analysis of the United States Renal Data System Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Wave II Study

BACKGROUND: The impact of obesity on survival in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients as related to dialysis modality (i.e., a direct comparison of hemodialysis with peritoneal dialysis) has not been assessed adjusting for differences in medication use, follow-up > or =2 years, or accounting for changes in dialysis modality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Wave II Study (DMMS) patients who started dialysis in 1996, and were followed until October 31 2001. Cox regression analysis was used to model adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) for mortality for categories of body mass index (BMI), both as quartiles and as > or =30 kg/m2 vs. lower. Because such a large proportion of peritoneal dialysis patients changed to hemodialysis during the study period (45.5%), a sensitivity analysis was performed calculating survival time both censoring and not censoring on the date of change from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis. RESULTS: There were 1675 hemodialysis and 1662 peritoneal dialysis patients. Among hemodialysis patients, 5-year survival for patients with BMI > or =30 kg/m2 was 39.8% vs. 32.3% for lower BMI (P < 0.01 by log-rank test). Among peritoneal dialysis patients, 5-year survival for patients with BMI >/=30 kg/m2 was 38.7% vs. 40.4% for lower BMI (P > 0.05 by log-rank test). In adjusted analysis, BMI > or = 30 kg/m2 was associated with improved survival in hemodialysis patients (AHR 0.89; 95% CI 0.81, 0.99; P= 0.042) but not peritoneal dialysis patients (AHR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86, 1.15; P= 0.89). Results were not different on censoring of change from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis. CONCLUSION: We conclude that any survival advantage associated with obesity among chronic dialysis patients is significantly less likely for peritoneal dialysis patients, compared to hemodialysis patients.     

The reposition technique for treatment of obstruction or migration of the peritoneal dialysis catheter

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis are widely used in the management of patients with chronic renal failure. The permanent presence of the catheter into the peritoneal cavity generate a series of specific complications. Two of the most important causes of dysfunctional peritoneal dialysis catheter are obstruction and malposition. Failure to restore the drainage function of the catheter by conservative method should be followed by a surgical procedure: laparoscopic reposition or replacing the catheter. This paper present an original technique which has some major advantages: required local anesthesia; doesn't replace the existing catheter; the dyalysis program could be started very quick after procedure; it is a feasible and reproducible technique.     

Characterization of an animal model of continuous peritoneal dialysis in chronic renal impairment.

In this study we describe the successful development of a method of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in a rat with stable chronic uremia. The procedure involved the insertion of a permanent indwelling cannula into the peritoneal cavity through which a draining catheter was passed for each dialysis. Dialysis of uremic animal hosts over a 24-hour period removed 31% of the urea excreted in the urine by normal animals over the same interval. The effect of daily dialysis for 21 days on biochemical, hematologic and cytologic parameters was also determined. The model will allow the basic pathobiology of common problems such as CAPD-associated peritonitis to be investigated.     

Home dialysis as a first option: a new paradigm

Traditionally, the initial choice of dialysis for patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) has been in-center hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Usually, the choice between these (PD vs. HD) has been based on the characteristics of the dialysis techniques. Obviously the choice of peritoneal dialysis implied dialysis at home, but its geographic location has been only a secondary consideration. Peritoneal dialysis has evolved as a dependable mode that gives good outcomes. This method has become more attractive with the option of overnight cyclers and the recent use of home helpers in some jurisdictions. At the same time the interest in home hemodialysis was rekindled by reports of good outcomes with short daily or nocturnal hemodialysis. Home dialysis (PD or HD) offers high quality of treatment, a high degree of patient independence, and is financially attractive. Therefore, we propose a change in our approach to the choice of the initial form of dialysis for patients with ESRD. Instead of choosing between HD and PD we should present the new patients the advantage of dialysis at home and instead of asking them to choose between peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis, they should be offered the option to choose between dialysis at home (PD or HD) or in-hospital. This paper will review the advantages of the home-based dialysis methods and the arguments for this simple but vital change in the process of choosing the method of dialysis.     

Is surgical PD catheter insertion safe for urgent‐start peritoneal dialysis?

Urgent‐start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) is increasingly seen as a viable alternative to hemodialysis through a central venous catheter for late‐presenting end‐stage renal disease patients. However, concerns remain about starting dialysis early following the surgical implantation of the peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter; urgent PD is often thought to be a safe option only after minimally invasive percutaneous catheter insertions. Analysis of the cumulative data from published literature presented in this review appears to negate this general perception and shows that compared to the percutaneous catheter insertions, starting PD urgently following surgically placed catheter is not associated with more catheter leaks, dysfunctions, or other complications. The outcome of USPD is independent of the mode of catheter insertion. Instead, measures to minimize intra‐peritoneal pressure including using the low initial dwell volume based on patient's weight and body habitus and keeping patients in strict supine posture during exchanges in the first 2 weeks of treatment are the two most important factors ensuring a minimization of the risk of catheter‐related complications.     

Quality of life in patients treated with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis: what are the important determinants?

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have significant impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In part, this is due to the intrusiveness of the treatment (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) that is required. It is unclear whether hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis is associated with a higher HRQOL. METHODS: 192 prevalent patients who self-selected treatment with hemodialysis (either in-center, satellite or home/self-care hemodialysis) or peritoneal dialysis were studied to determine whether treatment with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis is associated with a higher HRQOL. Demographic, laboratory and clinical information (including the presence of comorbid conditions using the Charlson comorbidity index) was assessed at baseline. The outcome of interest was HRQOL, which was measured using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form (KDQOL-SF), the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and the EuroQol EQ-5D at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in HRQOL scores for the SF-36, the EQ-5D and for 9 of 11 KDQOL dimensions for patients treated with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis at baseline. As expected, HRQOL was significantly lower for patients who had more comorbid disease, required assistance with their daily care, and for patients with less than a grade 12 education. After controlling for the effect of other important variables, HRQOL (as measured by the EQ-5D visual analog or index scores) did not differ between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. HRQOL was stable over time, both for patients who started on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in HRQOL for prevalent ESRD patients treated with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. It will be important to determine if this finding holds true for incident patients treated with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.     

Experience with renal transplantation in children undergoing peritoneal dialysis (CAPD/CCPD)

For children with end-stage renal disease, renal transplantation is the ultimate goal because it offers the potential of maximum rehabilitation. In order to evaluate the infectious risk of renal transplantation in patients previously maintained on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and/or continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD), we retrospectively evalauted the clinical course of 44 pediatric patients (mean age 12.0 +/- 5.7 [SD] years) who received 32 cadaver and 16 live-related donor renal grafts after being maintained on peritoneal dialysis for 756 patient-months (mean 17.1 +/- 11.5 months). In the posttransplant period, 25 patients (57%) required dialysis because of acute tubular necrosis or acute rejection. Peritonitis developed in five patients (11%) following transplantation; two were being dialyzed at the time. Exit-site and tunnel infections occurred in nine patients (20%). In all instances, antibiotic treatment and/or catheter removal was curative. Posttransplant ascites developed in 12 patients (27%) and was alleviated by catheter drainage. The catheters were left in situ at the time of transplantation and electively removed when stable graft function was present. The 1- and 2-year actuarial graft survival rate was 65% and 55%, respectively. One patient died in the immediate posttransplant period, which was unrelated to peritoneal dialysis. In conclusion, pediatric patients maintained on CAPD and/or CCPD can be safely transplanted. The potential infectious risks related to peritoneal dialysis can be managed with appropriate management of the catheter and prompt antibiotic therapy. The patient and graft survival rates are comparable to those with patients receiving hemodialysis prior to transplantation. There is no need to limit access to transplantation in children undergoing CAPD and/or CCPD.     

Laparoscopic placement of "self-locating catheter": our experience and a review of literature

Among the available devices for peritoneal dialysis, the Di Paolo self-locating catheter (SLC) represents a milestone using to its ability to ensure a permanent reliable means of access to the peritoneum. Our experience included 20 laparoscopic peritoneal catheter placements from 2008 to 2011. We performed the laparoscopic surgical technique using 3 trocars: 2 10 mm and 1 5 mm. The technique allows catheter introduction into the pouch of Douglas under direct vision. Among 20 treated patients, 1 died due to causes unrelated to peritoneal dialysis; 1 underwent transplantation, and 1 was switched to hemodialysis because of ultrafiltration failure. The complications included 2 catheter displacements, only 1 of them needing repositioning by open laparotomy, and 1 case of peritonitis. No infection in the subcutaneous tunnel or obstruction and malfunction occurred among our patients. The Di Paolo SLC is similar to Tenckhoff catheter but includes a small tungsten cylinder at the tip that engenders continuous gravity in the peritoneal cavity, producing a reduced risk of dislocation. In a large series of cases, Di Paolo et al. reported a 0.8% dislocation rate after SLC placement compared with 12% using Tenckhoff catheters. They also demonstrated a reduced risk of other complications, such as peritonitis, infection, obstruction, and failure. These data have been confirmed by other authors with smaller case series. Thus, introduction of the SLC and improved surgical techniques result in better efficiency of peritoneal dialysis.     

Chronic peritoneal dialysis: mechanical and infectious complications

The present report summarizes the mechanical and infectious complications attributable to the devices and procedures used for chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD), comparing the type and frequency of such complications in contemporaneous groups of patients undergoing continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) or intermittent PD (IPD). Mechanical complications related directly to the catheter and its placement proved to be equally frequent during CAPD and IPD. On the other hand, mechanical complications related to increased intraperitoneal pressure were more frequent during CAPD. In most instances mechanical complication can be managed without permanent interruption of chronic PD. Peritonitis occurs more frequently during CAPD (1.6 episodes per patient-year) than during IPD (0.4 episodes per patient-year), with a tendency to more frequent peritonitis among diabetics, children, patients with white blood cell abnormalities, patients with catheter cuff or tunnel inflammation, and during the 1st month of treatment. Medical therapy eradicates peritonitis and allows continuation of chronic PD with retention of the catheter in more than 90% of episodes, although special problems may be encountered with fungal, pseudomonal, and some coagulase-positive staphylococcal infections.     

Hyperlipidemia in uremic children: response to peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.

Hemodialysis and hyperlipidemia have been associated in both adults and children. The present study indicates hyperlipidemia in uremic children treated with peritoneal dialysis and implies that the cardiovascular risk felt to exist with hemodialysis also exists in peritoneal dialysis. Thirty-eight children with chronic renal insufficiency or end-stage renal disease were followed serially under varying conditions of medical management, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and transplantation. Serum triglyceride concentrations in patients on peritoneal dialysis were not significantly different from those in patients on hemodialysis, but both were significantly higher (P less than 0.01) than concentrations in patients on medical management and transplantation.