Off-pump coronary artery bypass may decrease the patency of saphenous vein grafts

BACKGROUND: There is concern that a hypercoagulable status is caused after coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, or OPCAB) and may potentially endanger the patency of the anastomosis. The aims of this study were: (1) to compare 1-year graft patency after OPCAB with that of conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and that of on-pump beating CABG; and (2) to demonstrate any differences in patency of various conduits among the three groups. METHODS: We analyzed the results of 122 consecutive OPCAB cases (group 1) compared with those of 65 consecutive conventional CABG cases (group II) and those of 19 consecutive on-pump beating CABG cases (group III). In group I, coronary angiography (CAG) was performed immediately postoperatively and 1 year after surgery. In groups II and III, CAG was performed 1 year after surgery. Graft patency was graded as grade A (excellent), grade B (fair), or grade O (occluded). RESULTS: The average number of distal anastomoses in groups I, II, and III were 3.1 +/- 1.1, 3.7 +/- 0.9, and 3.6 +/- 0.9, respectively. In group I, postoperative CAG was performed in 92% of patients (112/122) before discharge. The patency rate (grade A + B) was 96.4% (162/168) for arterial grafts, and 85.6% (160/187) for saphenous vein grafts (SVG). One-year follow-up CAG was performed in 74% of patients (90/122). The patency rate was 97.8% (132/135) for arterial grafts and 67.9% (106/156) for SVG. In group II, 1-year follow-up CAG was performed in 65% of patients (42/65). The patency rate (grade A + B) was 93.5% (43/46) for arterial grafts and 88.3% (98/111) for SVG. In group III, 1-year follow-up CAG was performed in 89% of patients (17/19). The patency rate (grade A + B) was 100% (19/19) for arterial grafts and 86.8% (33/38) for SVG. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the patency rate ot SVG after OPCAB was significantly lower than that of arterial grafts in the early postoperative CAG (p < 0.001), and was also significantly lower than those of SVG of group II (p < 0.001) and group III (p < 0.01) in the postoperative 1-year CAG, although there was no significant difference in 1-year patency of arterial grafts among the three groups. Our data suggest that a specific perioperative anticoagulant therapy may be advisable in patients undergoing OPCAB with SVG.     

Off-pump surgery decreases postoperative complications and resource utilization in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Bypass surgery in the elderly (age >70 years) has increased mortality and morbidity, which may be a consequence of cardiopulmonary bypass. We compare the outcomes of a cohort of elderly off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) patients with elderly conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. METHODS: Chart and provincial cardiac care registry data were reviewed for 30 consecutive elderly OPCAB patients (age 74.7 +/- 4.2 years) and 60 consecutive CABG patients (age 74.9 +/- 4.1 years, p = 0.82) with similar risk factor profiles: Parsonnet score 17.2 +/- 8.1 (OPCAB) versus 15.6 +/- 6.5 (CABG), p = 0.31; and Ontario provincial acuity index 4.5 +/- 1.9 (OPCAB) versus 4.3 +/- 2.0 (CABG), p = 0.65. RESULTS: Mean hospital stay was 6.3 +/- 1.8 days for OPCAB patients and 7.7 +/- 3.9 days for CABG patients (p < 0.05). Average intensive care unit stay was 24.0 +/- 10.9 h for OPCAB patients versus 36.6 +/- 33.5 h for CABG patients (p < 0.05). Atrial fibrillation occurred in 10.0% of OPCAB patients and 28.3% of CABG patients (p < 0.05). Low output syndrome was observed in 10% of OPCAB patients and 31.7% of CABG patients (p < 0.05). Cost was reduced by $1,082 (Canadian) per patient in the OPCAB group. Postoperative OPCAB graft analysis showed 100% patency. CONCLUSIONS: OPCAB is safe in the geriatric population and significantly reduces postoperative morbidity and cost.     

Clinical outcomes, angiographic patency, and resource utilization in 200 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study compared clinical outcomes and resource utilization in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Angiographic patency was documented in the OPCAB group. METHODS: From April 1997 through November 1999, OPCAB was performed in 200 consecutive patients, and the results were compared with those in a contemporaneous matched control group of 1,000 patients undergoing CABG. Patients were matched according to age, sex, preexisting disease (renal failure, diabetes, pulmonary disease, stroke, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, previous myocardial infarction, and primary or redo status. Follow-up in the OPCAB patients was 93% and averaged 13.4 months. RESULTS: Hospital death (1.0%), postoperative stroke (1.5%), myocardial infarction (1.0%), and re-entry for bleeding (1.5%) occurred infrequently in the OPCAB group. There were reductions in the rates of transfusion (33.0% versus 70.0%; p < 0.001) and deep sternal wound infection (0% versus 2.2%; p = 0.067) in the OPCAB group compared with the CABG group. Angiographic assessment of 421 grafted arteries was performed in 167 OPCAB patients (83.5%) prior to hospital discharge. All but five were patent (98.8%) (93.3% FitzGibbon A, 5.5% FitzGibbon B, 1.2% FitzGibbon O). All 163 internal mammary artery grafts were patent. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduced postoperative hospital stay from 5.7 +/- 5.3 days in the CABG group to 3.9 +/- 2.6 days (p < 0.001), with a decrease in hospital cost of 15.0% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduces hospital cost, postoperative length of stay, and morbidity compared with CABG on cardiopulmonary bypass. Off-pump coronary bypass grafting is safe, cost effective, and associated with excellent graft patency and clinical outcomes.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass

OBJECTIVES: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on the beating heart has become popular procedure in cardiac surgery and its initial results appeared favorable. We report our early and mid-term results of off-pump CABG performed at Shin-Tokyo Hospital. METHODS: Medical records of patients undergoing off-pump or conventional on-pump CABG from September 1, 1996, to August 31, 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent off-pump CABG were further classified into 2 groups; MIDCAB (Off-pump CABG for single vessel revascularization via a small skin incision) and OPCAB (off-pump CABG mainly approached via midline sternotomy) group. Their preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Among a total of 995 cases of CABG, 194 cases were off-pump CABG (male/female 142/52, mean age 66.9). The mean number of distal anastomoses in off-pump CABG was 1.9 +/- 0.9 (1.0 +/- 0.0 in MIDCAB and 2.3 +/- 0.7 in OPCAB), which was significantly fewer than in on-pump CABG (3.6 +/- 1.1), with p < 0.0001. Intubation time (5.3 +/- 5.7 hours in off-pump CABG vs 13.1 +/- 24.2 hours in on-pump CABG), ICU stay (1.7 +/- 1.1 vs 3.2 +/- 3.0 days), and postoperative hospital stay (14.0 +/- 7.9 vs 18.1 +/- 12.1 days) in off-pump CABG were significantly shorter than in on-pump CABG (p < 0.0001). In the off-pump CABG group, there were no in-hospital deaths and 14 major complications, fewer than in on-pump CABG (8 hospital deaths and 114 major complications). Postoperative angiography before hospital discharge was conducted in 80 patients (41.2%) and showed 2 occlusions, giving a graft patency rate of 98.6% in the off-pump group. During follow-up (0.9 +/- 0.6 year) period, there were 5 non-cardiac deaths and 20 cardiac events in the off-pump group. The actuarial survival rate at 36 months was 94.6% for off-pump CABG, showing no significant difference from the rate for conventional CABG patients (95.2% at 36 month, p = NS) The event-free rate was 84.0% at 36 months in off-pump CABG patients; however, which was less favorable than on-pump CABG patients (88.0% at 36 months, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both in-hospital and mid-term results for off-pump CABG patients were acceptable. Isolated CABG can thus be safely performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. Advances in coronary stabilization have contributed to these improved results. The observed long-term cardiac events may be related to incomplete revascularization.     

On- and off-pump coronary surgery and perioperative myocardial infarction: an issue between incomplete and extensive revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: Complete myocardial revascularization is the standard for coronary artery bypass grafting. It has been shown, however, that off-pump coronary bypass surgery (OPCAB) may reduce completeness of revascularization without affecting perioperative myocardial infarction rates. We evaluated the influence of OPCAB on major postoperative events in a large consecutive cohort of patients, with special emphasis on risk factors for perioperative myocardial infarction. METHODS: From 1995 to 2004, 5935 patients underwent isolated coronary bypass surgery; of these, 4623 (77.9%) and 1312 (22.1%) underwent on-pump coronary surgery (CABG) and OPCAB, respectively. Patients undergoing OPCAB were matched to patients undergoing CABG by propensity score; logistic regression analysis models were used to study predictors of perioperative myocardial infarction. RESULTS: In matched pairs, postoperative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and atrial fibrillation were similar between groups, while reoperation for bleeding, time on ventilator and red blood cell use were lower in patients undergoing OPCAB. The number of distal anastomoses was lower in patients undergoing OPCAB (2.2+/-0.80 in OPCAB vs 2.9+/-0.86 in CABG, p<0.001), as well as complete revascularization rates (61.9% in OPCAB vs 90.0% in CABG, p<0.001). Multivariate analyses, performed on preoperative and intraoperative variables, showed that both incomplete revascularization and increasing numbers of distal anastomoses (even when controlling for completeness of revascularization) were significant predictors of perioperative myocardial infarction, while CABG/OPCAB strategy did not influence it. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of surgical technique did not influence the occurrence of major perioperative complications and of myocardial infarction, which is negatively affected by incomplete or too extensive revascularization strategies.     

Further reduction in stroke after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a 10-year experience

BACKGROUND: Perioperative stroke is a devastating complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The reported incidence of neurologic complications after conventional CABG is 3% to 7%. With improved monitoring and surgical techniques, we have been able to achieve a drastic reduction in the stroke rate in our institution. This study evaluates the incidence of neurologic sequelae in patients who underwent off-pump CABG. METHODS: Over a 10-year period from January 1990 to September 2000, off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) operation was performed on 2,800 patients of the 18,037 patients undergoing CABG during that time frame at the Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre. Initially, OPCAB was performed selectively in the high-risk group of patients (atheromatous aorta, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, octogenarians, etc). Lately we performed multivessel OPCABs electively in about 60% to 65% of the patients undergoing CABG. Results. Mean age of the patients was 58.0 +/- 9.91 years (range 27 to 85 years) and mean number of grafts was 2.9 per patient. Neurologic complications (stroke/transient ischemic attack) occurred in 0.14% of patients. Overall hospital mortality in OPCAB patients was 2.14%, whereas mortality from neurologic complications was 0.07%. Predicted mortality (National Society of Thoracic Surgeons Cardiac Surgery Database Risk Model for CABG) for the entire patient group was 3.86% (p < 0.001). Conclusions. Although current techniques of monitoring and surgical procedures have significantly reduced the risk of stroke from CABG, our data strongly support OPCAB as a technique to further reduce stroke after CABG, especially in the high-risk group of patients.     

Myocardial Revascularization of the Beating Heart in High-Risk Patients

OBJECTIVE: Myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been proposed as an alternative technique in patients at high risk for conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The purpose of this article is to evaluate the potential benefit of such an approach. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the perioperative results of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) performed from January 1995 to December 1999. Patients were divided into three groups on the basis of their preoperative risk factors: age greater than 80 years, reoperative CABG, and left ventricular ejection fraction percentage (LVEF%) less than 40%. The three subgroups were compared with patients operated on-CPB (ONCAB) during the same period of time. A total of 172 octogenarians had ONCAB versus 97 OPCAB, 307 reoperations were ONCAB versus 274 OPCAB, and 514 patients with LVEF% less than 40% were operated ONCAB versus 220 OPCAB. RESULTS: Preoperative comorbidities were homogeneously distributed in the OPCAB and ONCAB groups. More extensive coronary artery disease was found in the ONCAB groups. A trend for a lower number of perioperative complications was reported in the OPCAB groups. Freedom from overall complications was significantly higher (p < 0.005) in the OPCAB group. Actual mortality rates in the OPCAB and ONCAB groups were comparable (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: CABG can be performed safely without CPB in patients with a high preoperative risk profile. Freedom from perioperative complications is markedly higher when the OPCAB approach is utilized.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: initial experience at one community hospital

BACKGROUND: This study reports one cardiac surgical center's experience with off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and compares clinical risk factors and outcomes with a group of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass at the same institution. METHODS: Data on preoperative risk factors, intraoperative clinical markers, and postoperative outcomes were collected prospectively on all patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures at our institution. From January 1, 1999, through October 7, 1999, 332 patients underwent OPCAB procedures at our institution. This group was compared with 445 consecutive patients undergoing CABG at the same institution during the period of January 1, 1998, through November 30, 1998. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with respect to preoperative clinical risk factors. Intraoperative data showed OPCAB patients tended to have fewer grafts performed and had a lower frequency of multiple grafts to obtuse marginal vessels. Outcomes showed no differences in the incidence of perioperative stroke, mediastinitis, reexploration for bleeding, pulmonary complications, new renal failure, postoperative atrial fibrillation, or transfusion of blood products. Patients in the OPCAB group had fewer perioperative myocardial infarctions and lower incidence of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. A higher percentage of OPCAB patients had surgical lengths of stay of 5 days or less. The OPCAB group tended to have a lower in-hospital mortality rate but this difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with revascularization of all coronary artery segments is a safe and effective procedure that can be performed with equal or improved outcomes and shorter surgical lengths of stay compared with CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Coronary artery bypass in patients 80 years and over: is off-pump the operation of choice?

BACKGROUND: Octogenarians are at increased risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality after coronary artery bypass. In this study we compared our experience with patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass (CAB) and those undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) to assess outcomes. METHODS: We used hospital database analysis in patients 80 years and older who underwent nonemergent coronary artery bypass with (N = 169) and without (N = 60) cardiopulmonary bypass from January 1999 through June 2001. RESULTS: Both groups were at increased perioperative risk based on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk model (7.7% OPCAB vs 5.8% CAB, p = 0.03). There were no operative deaths in the OPCAB group but there were eight (4.7%) in the CAB group (p = NS). Perioperative stroke (0% OPCAB vs 7.1% CAB, p = 0.04), prolonged ventilation (1.7% OPCAB vs 11.8% CAB, p = 0.02), and transfusion rate (33% OPCAB vs 70.4% CAB, p < 0.001) were all lower in the OPCAB group. A shorter hospital stay (6.3 days OPCAB vs 11.5 days CAB, p < 0.001) resulted in lower hospital cost in the OPCAB group ($9,363 OPCAB vs $12,312 CAB, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients was associated with fewer complications, a shorter hospital stay, and lower hospital cost. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting may be the operation of choice for octogenarians requiring surgical myocardial revascularization.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass versus off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass grafting: does eliminating the pump reduce morbidity and cost?

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may contribute to the complications and cost of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Off-pump CABG (OPCAB) allows coronary revascularization without CPB. We hypothesized that OPCAB provides satisfactory graft patency while reducing complications and cost compared with CABG with CPB. METHODS: We prospectively followed 80 patients undergoing CABG: 40 patients undergoing OPCAB and 40 patients undergoing CABG with CPB. OPCAB patients underwent angiography within 48 hours of surgery to determine early graft patency. Incidence of complications, length of stay, and costs were recorded for each patient. The influence of the number of vessels bypassed was analyzed. RESULTS: OPCAB patients (n = 40) underwent grafting of 2.7 +/- 0.7 vessels per patient compared with 3.6 +/- 0.8 vessels per patient in the CABG with CPB group (n = 40) (p < 0.0001). Angiography demonstrated 105 of 108 (97%) of grafts were patent in the OPCAB group. Incidence of complications, length of stay, and costs did not differ between the OPCAB and CABG with CPB groups. Number of vessels grafted showed a positive correlation to total costs in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: While OPCAB provided satisfactory early graft patency, there was no significant difference between OPCAB and CABG with CPB with regard to cost, length of stay, or incidence of complications. In this study, eliminating CPB did not reduce morbidity or cost after CABG.     

Resource utilization in on- and off-pump coronary artery surgery: factors influencing postoperative length of stay--an experience of 1,746 consecutive patients undergoing fast-track cardiac anesthesia

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present investigation was to examine factors influencing resource utilization in patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft and off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) graft surgery at a major university hospital. The resources examined were time to extubation, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, intensive care length of stay (ICULOS), preoperative and postoperative length of stay (PLOS), and total length of stay (LOS). DESIGN: Observational study of consecutive patients undergoing on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. SETTING: Tertiary care cardiac referral center. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand seven hundred forty-six consecutive male and female patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery over a period of 3 years (1999-2001). Eight hundred eighty-one patients underwent CABG with pump, and 865 patients underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean time to extubation after surgery was 7.4 hours for on-pump patients and 5.8 hours for the OPCAB group (p72 hours to postoperative tracheal extubation compared with 1.5% in the OPCAB group (p=0.041). Hospital mortality was 2.7% for the on-pump group and 1.0% for the OPCAB group (p=0.010). CONCLUSION: The authors found that patients undergoing on-pump CABG have significantly longer time to tracheal extubation, increased blood use, longer ICULOS, PLOS, and total LOS and higher in-hospital mortality, which would translate into significant differences in the expenses associated with these 2 surgical approaches to coronary surgery.     

Off-pump versus on-pump reoperative CABG via a left thoracotomy for circumflex coronary artery revascularization

OBJECTIVE: Reoperative CABG via a left thoracotomy (RCLT) has become a useful approach for revascularization of the circumflex coronary territory for patients who are at high risk for conventional approach. This study compares the results of RCLT using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with those of a beating heart technique (OPCAB). METHODS: Thirty-two patients who underwent RCLT over the past 10 years were included. Fourteen patients undergoing on-pump RCLT (CPB) were compared to 18 patients undergoing off-pump RCLT (OPCAB). Baseline characteristics of the study groups were similar. Follow-up was 100% complete. A single graft was performed in all patients except one who had two grafts. RESULTS: There were no deaths or perioperative myocardial infarctions in either group. The incidence of atrial fibrillation (CPB: 29% vs. OPCAB: 11%) and the percentage of patients requiring ventilator support longer than 24 hours (21% vs. 6%) was not significantly different between the groups. However, allogeneic blood product utilization (0.9 +/- 1.2 vs. 0.3 +/- 0.7 units, p = 0.04), ICU stay (65 +/- 79 vs. 28 +/- 16 hours, p = 0.04) and total hospital length of stay (8 +/- 4 vs. 5 +/- 1 days, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in the OPCAB group. Average follow-up for the entire cohort was 33 +/- 9.8 months (range 2-102 months). Three-year survival was 74 +/- 9% with 9 deaths (28%) during the follow-up, but only 3 (9%) were cardiac related. Reinterventions were indicated in 6 patients (19%) (PTCA; 5, CABG: 1). Follow-up was longer for the CPB group (51 +/- 33 vs. 19.5 +/- 14 months, p = 0.001). Three-year survival (CPB 69 +/- 13%, OPCAB: 82 +/- 12%, p = 0.47) and reintervention rates (CPB: 3 [21%], OPCAB: 3 [17%], p = 0.33) were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: RCLT is an effective and safe approach for circumflex artery revascularization with excellent short- and mid-term results using either technique. The OPCAB technique is associated with reduced blood product utilization and shorter ICU and hospital length of stay and, therefore, is more cost-effective.     

Effect of gender on outcomes of beating heart operations

BACKGROUND: A worse outcome has been observed in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with men. We sought to determine whether this gender difference would be applicable in off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) procedures. METHODS: We compared outcomes among 187 consecutive patients undergoing OPCAB over a 12-month period by a single surgeon (J.H.L.). This study included 61 women and 126 men, representing 91% of all isolated CABG operations during the same time. RESULTS: The demographics were as follows: Women (n = 61) were older than men (n = 126) (67.5 versus 64.6 years; p = 0.05). They had a greater prevalence of congestive heart failure (28% versus 17%; p = 0.005), and were more frequently on intravenous nitroglycerin preoperatively (49% versus 32%; p = 0.05). Overall mortality was 1.6% (3 of 187). In-hospital complications were as follows: deaths 3.3% in women and 0.9% in men (p = 0.25); major bleeding 0% in women and 3.2% in men (p = 0.30); stroke 1.5% in women and 0% in men (p = NS). Mediastinitis or renal failure was not noted in either group. Extubation times (6.6 versus 6.1 hours; p = 0.001), surgical intensive care unit length of stay (43 hours versus 37 hours; p = 0.013), and postoperative length of stay (6.4 days versus 5.8 days; p = 0.014) were all significantly longer in women compared with men. When OPCAB women were compared with a matched cohort of women undergoing CABG, length of stay was similar, whereas OPCAB men realized a 13% reduction in length of stay compared with men undergoing conventional CABG (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Women presenting for OPCAB are older and have greater comorbidities than men. The elimination of cardiopulmonary bypass did not improve the recovery time of women, a finding that was strikingly different from the effect seen in men. These compelling results suggest that biochemical, hormonal, or pharmacokinetic factors in women may neutralize the anticipated beneficial effect of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Comparison of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in midterm results.

OBJECTIVE: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has become a procedure of choice for surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. Although early advantages of OPCAB were confirmed in comparison with conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), late cardiac complications are still controversial. We examined midterm results of OPCAB compared with standard CABG. METHODS: Between July 1997 and April 2002, 736 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG were retrospectively reviewed. The OPCAB group (Group I) comprised 357 patients (49%), and the on-pump CABG group (Group II) 379 patients (51%). Their preoperative, intraoperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean number of distal anastomoses and the early graft patency were not greatly different between the two groups. The actuarial survival rate at 3 years was not significantly different between Group I (98.3%) and Group II (98.2%) (p = 0.71). The frequency of cardiac events was 4.2%/patient-year in Group I and 2.6%/patient-year in Group II (p = 0.12). The actuarial event free rates were not different between the two groups (p = 0.61). The cardiac event free rates at 3 years were significantly (p = 0.011) higher in patients with complete revascularization (96.7%) than without complete revascularization in Group I (69.2%) and in Group II (92.7% versus 85.9%, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Midterm clinical outcome in OPCAB is as good as conventional on-pump CABG. Incomplete revascularization caused cardiac events more frequently than complete revascularization both in OPCAB and on-pump CABG in the intermediate follow-up.     

Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce the incidence of clinically evident renal dysfunction after multivessel myocardial revascularization?

In this prospective, observational trial, we determined whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) was associated with less postoperative renal dysfunction (RD) compared with coronary bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CABG). All patients undergoing primary, isolated coronary surgery at our institution in the year 2000 participated. Data collected on each patient included demographics, preoperative risk factors for RD, perioperative events, and serum creatinine concentrations from date of admission until discharge or death. The criteria for RD was both a >or=50% increase from preoperative creatinine and an absolute postoperative creatinine >or=2.0 mg/dL (177 microM). Student's t-test or the Fisher's exact test was used to compare groups. Stepwise multiple logistic regression identified determinants of RD; P < 0.05 significant. The CABG group (n = 119) differed from the OPCAB group (n = 220) with respect to age (64 +/- 13 versus 67 +/- 10 yr, P = 0.0074) and number of distal grafts (median 4 versus 3, P = 0.0003). Type of operation did not associate with the presence of postoperative RD: 18 (8.2%) of 220 OPCAB patients versus 12 (10%) of 119 CABG patients (P = 0.55). Our data suggest that choice of operative technique (OPCAB versus CABG) is not associated with reduced renal morbidity.     

Is it unnecessary to attach a temporary pacing wire in off-pump coronary artery bypass?

In open heart surgery, the efficacy of temporary pacing to control perioperative cardiac dysrhythmias is well known. However, a temporary pacing wire is not routinely attached during minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass because of its less invasiveness. In case of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) with mediansternotomy, is it also unnecessary? We report 2 patients undergoing OPCAB without postoperative temporary pacing wire who suffered from possibly fatal rhythm disturbances after operation, and needed long hospitalization. After these experiences, we routinely attach a temporary pacing wire during OPCAB with mediansternotomy. We believe, in case of OPCAB, a temporary pacing wire is as effective as in conventional CABG.     

Myocardial revascularization in patients with low ejection fraction < or =35%: effect of pump technique on early morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Left ventricular dysfunction is an important predictor of in-hospital mortality. Surgical risk among these patients remains high. The present study is conducted to evaluate the difference in early morbidity and mortality among patients with compromised left ventricular function (LVF) after myocardial revascularization using either off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass graft. METHODS: Between April 2000 and April 2004, 150 patients with ejection fraction (EF) < or =35% underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Eighty-four patients underwent conventional bypass (mean EF 30.1%+/- 4.2) and 66 patients had off-pump coronary artery bypass (mean EF 27.5%+/- 5.5). Different variables (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) were evaluated and compared. Determination of operation risk was done using EuroSCORE. Patients who underwent OPCAB were more risky due to a high percentage of associated comorbidities, mean EuroSCORE was 12.96 +/- 13.21 in comparison to 8.47 +/- 10.22 in CCAB. RESULTS: The mean operative mortality was 8.7%. Patients who underwent OPCAB had a lower operative mortality than CCAB (6.1% vs. 10.7%) inspite of a higher preoperative predicted risk score. Completeness of revascularization was higher among the CCAB group (85.7% vs. 69.7%; p = 0.01). Subsequently, the mean number of grafts was significantly higher among this group (3.4+/-0.7 vs. 2.0 +/-0.9; p < 0.001). On the other hand, morbidity was significantly higher in CCAB (35.7% vs. 19.7%; p = 0.03). However, the incidence of both myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation was more among OPCAB. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with left ventricular dysfunction are high-risk group. These patients can benefit from myocardial revascularization using either off-pump or conventional CABG, but both are associated with a higher mortality and morbidity than those with normal ventricle. The use of off-pump CABG resulted in better clinical outcome and mortality, but less number of grafts performed than those with conventional CABG especially in patients with lowest EF.     

Midterm outcomes of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery revascularization in renal transplant recipients

Abstract Objectives: Renal transplant recipients have high mortality from cardiac causes and are frequently in need of coronary interventions. Surgical coronary revascularization is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in this patient population. This study was undertaken to evaluate outcomes of on‐pump versus off‐pump revascularization in renal transplant recipients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 43 renal transplant recipients who underwent surgical coronary revascularization with functioning allografts. Revascularization was performed on‐pump [coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)] in 21 patients and off‐pump [off‐pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB)] in 22 patients. Results: Preoperative characteristics did not differ between the two groups except for age and incidence of prior sternotomy. Total operative time and transfusion requirements were similar. The on‐pump group received a higher number of bypass grafts (p = 0.03). Overall 30‐day, one‐year, five‐year, and eight‐year survival was 90%, 76%, 61%, and 32% for CABG group, and 95%, 86%, 62%, and 48% for OPCAB group (p = 0.53). The postoperative peak creatinine was higher in the CABG patients than in OPCAB patients (p = 0.04). At discharge, there was no difference in mean creatinine between the two groups. The rate of return to permanent dialysis after revascularization was similar (28% for CABG and 22% for OPCAB, p = 0.73). There was no difference in dialysis‐free survival up to eight‐years postrevascularization (p = 0.63). Conclusions: Despite higher mortality risk, surgical coronary revascularization can be performed safely in renal transplant recipients. OPCAB resulted in no improvement in patient survival or renal allograft function compared to on‐pump revascularization. (J Card Surg 2011;26:591‐595)     

Coronary artery bypass grafting: an off-pump versus on-pump review

There has been a proliferation in the number of coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) being performed without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, the benefits of off-pump coronary artery grafting (OPCAB) are still being determined. The aim of this retrospective review was to compare the perioperative outcomes of CPB patients with OPCAB patients and to identify the patients most likely to benefit from the off-pump procedure. We reviewed the perioperative data of all isolated CABG patients at two metropolitan hospitals for the period of August 2000 to September 2001. The two groups (OPCAB vs. CPB) were further divided into subgroups identifying patients by their predicted mortality (higher-risk and lower-risk) and the number of distal graft anastomoses received (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5). A p value less than .05 was considered significant. Out of the total of 882 patients, 46.2% were OPCAB cases. Both CPB and OPCAB groups were similar in terms of demographics and predicted risk of mortality. Intraoperatively, OPCAB patients had fewer distal graft anastomoses (2.4 +/- 1.0 vs. 3.2 +/- 1.0, p < .001). Postoperatively, patients in the OPCAB group had less chest drainage (889 +/- 588 vs. 989 +/- 662 mls, p < .001), sustained fewer strokes (0.2 vs. 1.9%, p < .05), were transfused less (15.4 vs. 32.5%, p < .001) and were discharged earlier (7.3 +/- 5.6 vs. 8.5 +/- 9.1 days, p < .05). For higher-risk patients, OPCAB was associated with fewer reoperations for bleeding (1.3 vs. 6.4%, p < .05), a lower stroke rate (0 vs. 3.2%, p < .05), and a trend toward lower mortality (7.1 vs. 15.1%, p = .08). However, lower-risk OPCAB patients' stroke incidences (0.5% OPCAB group vs. 1.4% CPB group), and mortality rates (0.5 vs. 0.5%) were similar. Comparisons by number of grafts performed revealed that only the single-grafted OPCAB patients had statistically fewer postoperative complications, reduced chest drainage, and a shorter intensive care stay. Differences between either operation groups in transfusion rates were only statistically significant for the one to three grafted patients, while postoperative stays were similar for patients having four grafts. These results suggest that OPCAB is associated with a reduction in mortality and morbidity, particularly within the higher-risk patients. However, the benefits of OPCAB diminished with an increasing number of distal anastomoses performed.     

Coronary revascularization of the circumflex system: different approaches and long-term outcome

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, without cardiopulmonary bypass, through a left lateral thoracotomy approach (lateral MIDCAB), is a safe alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump CABG) of the circumflex system via median sternotomy. However, it is unknown whether lateral MIDCAB may yield an improved long-term outcome over the conventional on-pump median sternotomy approach. METHODS: We compared the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing lateral MIDCAB (n = 34) versus conventional on-pump CABG of the circumflex system (n = 16) from June 1996 to July 1999. The two groups were similar with respect to baseline characteristics and risk stratification. Patients who required only one or two grafts for complete revascularization were included. RESULTS: Lateral MIDCAB patients had a lower need than on-pump CABG patients for intraoperative (12% MIDCAB vs 43% on-pump CABG, p = 0.03) and postoperative transfusions (29% vs 69%, p = 0.01), had fewer neuropsychologic changes (0% vs 19%, p = 0.03), and had a lower rate of postoperative atrial fibrillation (12% vs 44%, p = 0.02). Lateral MIDCAB was also associated with a significantly lower postoperative length of stay (5 +/- 2 vs 7 +/- 3 days, p = 0.02). Actuarial survival at a mean period of follow-up of 19 +/- 11 months was 97% for the lateral MIDCAB versus 88% for the on-pump CABG group (p = 0.6). Event-free survival was 88% for lateral MIDCAB versus 81% for on-pump CABG (p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Lateral MIDCAB may safely be performed in patients with isolated coronary artery disease of the circumflex system with improved early morbidity and an abbreviated hospital stay compared with conventional median sternotomy on-pump CABG.