Effective immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab plus triple therapy in renal transplantation: five-year single-center experience

We studied prospectively the efficacy and safety of basiliximab combined with triple immunosuppression in adult recipients of > or = 1 HLA-mismatched deceased donor renal grafts. All studied patients received equal immunosuppressive drugs: 20 mg infusion of basiliximab on day 0 and on day 4, cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. An analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of acute rejection episodes, safety of this therapy, renal graft function, and patient and graft survivals. One hundred seventy-two patients were studied. The HLA-antigen mismatches were 2.9 +/- 0.9 (mean +/- SD), and the cold ischemia time was 22.0 +/- 7.5 hours. Fifty-three (31.5%) patients experienced delayed graft function. At 12 months, 5 (3.0%) patients experienced acute rejection. Six renal grafts were lost, but not from rejection. Two patients died. Sixty-six infections required treatment in the hospital. One carcinoma of cervix (in situ) and two basal cell carcinomas of skin were detected. Hypersensitivity reactions and cytokine-release syndrome were not observed. At 12 months, serum creatinine was significantly higher (119 +/- 46 micromol/L; P < .001) in patients with delayed graft function than in patients with immediate graft function (99 +/- 26 micromol/L). Patient and graft survivals were 98.8% and 97.1%, respectively. Basiliximab combined with this triple therapy was an efficient and safe immunosuppression strategy, demonstrated with very low incidence of acute rejections, an acceptable adverse event profile, excellent graft function, and high short-term survival rates in adult recipients of deceased donor renal transplant.     

Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody sequential immunosuppressive induction therapy in renal transplants with high risk of delayed graft function

There is little experience on the use of monoclonal antibodies that block the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor (basiliximab and daclizumab) in sequential therapy in renal transplants with risk of delayed graft function. This study sougth to test the efficacy and safety of the substitution of anticalcineurins with two doses of basiliximab or daclizumab in the immediate posttransplant period for recipients at risk of delayed renal graft function. Immunosuppression consisted of steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and two doses of basiliximab (20 mg/day) on days 0 and 4 posttransplant or daclizumab (1 mg/kg per day) on days 0 and 15 posttransplant. Anticalcineurins were not administered until the beginning of graft function. Among 49 recipients (mean age 63.5 +/- 10.5 years), 40 received a kidney from a donor over 60 years of age, three from a non-heart-beating donor, and six from donors with an acute elevation of serum creatinine to 2.4 +/- 0.86 (1.7-3.7). At a mean follow-up of 14.2 +/- 8.4 months, five patients experienced acute rejection episodes. Only 15 patients needed posttransplant dialysis (2.7 +/- 1.6). In 11 patients, cyclosporine (CsA) was introduced at 6 +/- 2.9 days posttransplant and in 37, tacrolimus on 8.6 +/- 3.6 days posttransplant. The incidence of kidney graft loss was 16.3%. Patient survival was 96%. Thirty-nine recipients are alive with functioning grafts, with mean serum creatinine of 1.4 mg/dL. In conclusion, substitution for anticalcineurins with interleukin-2-receptor blockade in the immediate posttransplant period for patients at risk of delayed graft function minimizes nephrotoxicity and reduces tubular necrosis, without increasing the risk of an acute rejection episode.     

Two-dose basiliximab compared with two-dose daclizumab in renal transplantation: a clinical study

BACKGROUND: Addition of the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antagonists basiliximab or daclizumab to a calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen significantly reduces risk of acute rejection with a tolerability profile similar to a placebo. Use of a truncated two-dose regimen of daclizumab has been reported, but till date, there has been no controlled study of two-dose daclizumab vs. two-dose basiliximab. METHODS: Deceased-donor renal transplant recipients were randomized to basiliximab (20 mg on days 0 and 4) or daclizumab (50 mg on days 1 and 14) with cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Flow cytometry was used to calculate the proportion of CD25(+) T cells in peripheral blood. RESULTS: Thirty patients were randomized to basiliximab and 28 to daclizumab. There was one patient death in each group, with no other graft losses. By six months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 0% with basiliximab vs. 21.4% with daclizumab (p < 0.05). Three patients in the daclizumab group required OKT3 for steroid-resistant rejection. There were no between-group differences in the incidence of infection. The proportion of CD25(+) T cells declined markedly during the first two wk in both groups, but was significantly lower in the basiliximab group during weeks six to eight. CONCLUSION: Two doses of basiliximab are more effective than two 1 mg/kg doses of daclizumab in preventing acute rejection in de novo renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroid maintenance therapy. In patients receiving relatively low-level immunosuppression in order to minimize toxicity, basiliximab may be preferable to a truncated daclizumab regimen.     

Comparison of basiliximab and daclizumab with triple immunosuppression in renal transplantation

Purpose

Graft rejection is a serious problem despite immunosuppressive agents. Immunosuppression has been achieved with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) that bind specifically to the α subunit of the interleukin (IL)-2 receptor present on activated T lymphocytes. We explored the effects of two of the mAbs-daclizumab and basiliximab-on graft function.

Materials and methods

Our 1543 renal transplant recipients received baseline therapy with cyclosporine or tacrolimus plus corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil. In addition standard dosages intravenously of daclizumab (n = 156) or basiliximab (n = 45) in were administered intravenously to 201 renal transplant patients who included 122 men and 79 women of overall mean age of 30 ± 13.7 years.

Results

Patient and donor characteristics including age, sex, causes of renal failure, presence of comorbidities, panel-reactive antibodies, and numbers of human leukocyte antigen-mismatched were similar between the groups. During a mean follow-up of 27 ± 20 months, biopsy-proven acute rejection was observed in three patients in the basiliximab group and 23 in the daclizumab group. Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 13 patients. There was no case of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Three polyoma BK nephropathies were detected in the daclizumab group. No hypersensitivity reaction occurred in either group. One-year patient survival was 100% in the basiliximab group and 99% in the daclizumab group, with graft survivals of 95% versus 94%, respectively. The mean creatinine levels at discharge were 2 mg/dL versus 2.3 mg/dL and at 12 months, 1.3 mg/dL versus 1.2 mg/dL, respectively.

Conclusions

Acute rejection episodes remain a significant risk factor for the development of graft dysfunction and poor long-term graft survival. IL-2R antagonists were effective antibody therapies. There was no apparent difference between basiliximab and daclizumab treatment.     

Daclizumab Versus Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin in High‐Risk Renal Transplants: Five‐Year Follow‐up of a Randomized Study

We previously reported a randomized controlled trial in which 227 de novo deceased‐donor kidney transplant recipients were randomized to rabbit antithymocyte (rATG, Thymoglobulin) or daclizumab if they were considered to be at high immunological risk, defined as high panel reactive antibodies (PRA), loss of a first kidney graft through rejection within 2 years of transplantation, or third or fourth transplantation. Patients treated with rATG had lower incidences of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) and steroid‐resistant rejection at 1 year. Patients were followed to 5 years posttransplant in an observational study; findings are described here. Treatment with rATG was associated with a lower rate of BPAR at 5 years (14.2% vs. 26.0% with daclizumab; p = 0.035). Only one rATG‐treated patient (0.9%) and one daclizumab‐treated patient (1.0%) developed BPAR after 1 year. Five‐year graft and patient survival rates, and renal function, were similar between the two groups. Overall graft survival at 5 years was significantly higher in patients without BPAR (81.0% vs. 54.8%; p < 0.001). In conclusion, rATG is superior to daclizumab for the prevention of BPAR among high‐immunological‐risk renal transplant recipients. Overall graft survival at 5 years was approximately 70% with either induction therapy, which compares favorably to low‐risk cohorts.     

Results in 158 consecutive cadaveric renal transplantations

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the outcome of deceased donor kidney transplantations performed in a single center in a developing country. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 158 patients (69 male and 89 female patients, including 32 children) received kidney grafts obtained from deceased donors between March 1996 and October 2004. Cadaveric renal grafts were transplanted after a cold ischemia time of 4 to 24 hours (mean, 12.5 hours). Retransplantation was performed in 19 recipients. Induction immunosuppression was achieved with antithymocyte globulin. The diagnosis of acute graft rejection was based on histopathological findings. RESULTS: Primary graft function was observed in 77% of cases. Posttransplantation complications were: surgical (n = 60; 38%), systemic bacterial and viral infections (n = 33; 21%), acute rejection (n = 47; 30%), and malignancy (n = 2; 1.3%). Seventeen recipients died with a functioning graft, and 23 more grafts were lost. The 7-year actuarial survival rates were 89% and 75% for recipients and grafts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The kidney transplantation program in Kuwait is steadily growing. Kidney grafts obtained from deceased donors contributed 28% of the transplantation activity and were associated with a high rate of primary function. Overall actuarial recipient and graft survival rates were comparable to those reported by larger centers.     

Induction immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation: does basiliximab make the difference?

The optimal prophylactic induction immunosuppressive therapy to prevent renal transplant rejection remains controversial. Recently, basiliximab efficiency has been reported in several studies. We sought to evaluate the efficiency of induction immunosuppressive therapy with basiliximab in renal transplantation in our unit based upon the acute rejection rate, patient and graft survivals, first hospital admission length, and incidence of infectious or malignant complications during 4 years of follow-up. We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of two groups of renal transplant recipients treated with triple immunosuppressive therapy (cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone) without (group 1, 149 patients) or with (group 2, 104 patients) induction immunosuppression with basiliximab. The two groups did not differ in demographic characteristics, number of hypersensitized patients, cold ischemia time, or donor age. The group receiving basiliximab displayed a significantly lower acute rejection rate (7.6% vs 24%, P = .001) and shorter first hospital admission (14.4 +/- 8 vs 19.5 +/- 11 days). There was no difference in graft or patient survival, death due to sepsis, or incidence of posttransplant malignancies. Although there was no difference in graft or patient survival, immunosuppressive induction therapy with basiliximab yielded a significant reduction in the acute rejection rate.     

Randomized double-blind study of immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab,a chimeric anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody,in combination with mycophenolate mofetil-containing triple therapy in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection remains a major problem in renal transplantation. Immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab (Simulect) has achieved significant reductions in acute rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients receiving dual immunosuppression. This study explored the tolerability and cumulative benefit of combining basiliximab with triple-drug therapy-cyclosporine (USP Modified, Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 123 kidney transplant recipients received either basiliximab at 20 mg before transplantation (day 0) and 20 mg on day 4 (n=59), or placebo (n=64). All received triple-drug immunosuppression and were followed for 6 months. RESULTS: Tolerability of basiliximab was equivalent to placebo, with no increase in serious adverse events, infection, malignancy, or posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. At 6 months, there were trends in favor of basiliximab over placebo in the incidences of first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (15.3% vs. 26.6%, P=NS) and of acute rejection treated with antibody (5.1% vs. 15.6%, P=NS). Kaplan-Meier estimates at 4 weeks and 6 months were significantly in favor of basiliximab treatment for first acute rejection, biopsy-confirmed rejection, rejection episodes treated with antibody therapy, and treatment failure. Renal function improved more rapidly in the basiliximab group, with mean creatinine clearance at week 2 being 54.7 mL/min versus 43.2 mL/min for placebo (P=0.034). At 12 months, patient survival was 100% in both groups; graft survival was 94.9% with basiliximab and 92.2% with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab immunoprophylaxis is safe, well tolerated, and shows a trend toward reduction in number of acute rejection episodes in renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.     

Causes of long-term graft failure in renal transplantation

Summary A single-center experience of 980 consecutive renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine (CyA) was reviewed to analyze the causes of renal allograft loss and the factors affecting long-term renal survival in CyA-treated kidney transplants. In all, 217 grafts were lost during the observation period, with the most common causes of graft loss being chronic rejection (96 cases, 44%), death with a functioning graft (52 cases, 24%), glomerulonephritis (28 cases, 13%), and acute rejection (20 cases, 8%). The actuarial 10-year survival of patients with living and cadaveric grafts was 93% and 91%, respectively. The actuarial 10-year survival of living and cadaveric grafts was 70% and 63%, respectively. Patients were divided into two groups, namely a graft-survival group (n=763) and a graft-loss group (n=217). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of sex, donor source, donor age, recipient age, duration of hemodialysis, retransplants, transfusions, presensitization, of HLA match. There was no difference between the graft-survival group and the graft-loss group in the mean CyA dose given or the mean CyA trough level measured at any time following transplantation. Acute rejection episodes occurred in patients from the graft-survival group (55%) as compared with those from the graft-loss group (83%; P<0.00001). These data suggest that long-term graft survival in CyA-treated kidney transplant patients is primarily influenced by the occurrence of rejection episodes rather than by the drug dose or the duration of CyA administration. CyA nephrotoxicity was not the major risk factor for long-term graft survival in CyA-treated renal transplants.     

WOFIE synergizes with calcineurin-inhibitor treatment and early steroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: According to the window of opportunity for immunologic engagement (WOFIE) concept, as designed by R. Calne, the authors prospectively analyzed the effect of a 72-hr immunosuppressive window on graft function in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Immunosuppressive therapy comprised tacrolimus (trough levels, 5-8 ng/mL after day 8 posttransplantation), daclizumab (1 mg/kg body weight at day 0 and 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks posttransplantation), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (1-2 g/day), and prednisolone. All patients received an induction therapy including daclizumab, prednisolone, and MMF. WOFIE patients were stopped from immunosuppression for 72 hr posttransplant. Steroids were withdrawn in both groups 12 to 16 weeks after transplantation and dual therapy with MMF and low-dose tacrolimus ensued. RESULTS: Thirty renal transplant recipients (16 in the WOFIE group and 14 in the control group) have been enrolled since May 2000. Patient and graft survival were 93.8% and 87.5%, respectively, in the WOFIE group and 100.0% and 92.9% in the control group, respectively. One patient in the WOFIE group died of cytomegalovirus infection with stable graft function. There were no grafts lost because of acute rejection or primary nonfunction in either group. Patients treated according to the WOFIE protocol revealed less acute rejection episodes during the time of observation (first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection rate 12.5% in the WOFIE group vs. 42.9% in the control cohort). Whereas 92.1% of the WOFIE patients were successfully discontinued from steroids, permanent steroid withdrawal was achieved in only 60% of the control cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Initial interruption of immunosuppression was associated with a decrease of acute graft rejections. Subsequently, the authors postulate a synergistic effect on the immunosuppressive efficiency of calcineurin inhibitors when combined with an initial drug-free window.     

Basiliximab (Simulect) in renal transplantation with high risk for delayed graft function

BACKGROUND: Basiliximab (Simulect) is effective in reducing episodes of acute rejection in renal transplantation. Delayed graft function (DGF) predisposes to acute rejection and shortens graft survival. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of basiliximab in renal transplantation recipients at high risk for DGF. METHODS: We studied 87 patients (mean age, 59 years), 42 of whom received basiliximab, 20 mg before transplantation and 20 mg on day 4. This cohort was compared with 45 patients without basiliximab. All received cyclosporine (51%) or tacrolimus (49%), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. DGF was defined as the requirement for dialysis within the first week after transplantation or failure to improve preexisting renal function. High-risk factors for DGF were cold ischemia time, recipient and donor age, non-heart-beating donor, HLA matching, and panel reactive antibody (PRA). RESULTS: The incidence of DGF was 18 (43%) in the basiliximab group versus 28 (62%) in the other patients (P = .07). When allografts from non-heart-beating donors were excluded, this incidence was 14 (38%) in the basiliximab group versus 28 (62%) in the other patients (P = .04). Regression analysis showed basiliximab to be a protective factor: 0.26 (range, 0.09-0.76). Basiliximab was well tolerated, and complications were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab reduced the incidence of DGF in patients who received a high-risk allograft. It was well tolerated, and no adverse events were reported. The use of basiliximab may be considered in patients receiving an allograft who are at high risk for DGF.     

Excellent outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation: a single-center experience

Introduction

Due to the severe shortage of deceased donors in Japan, ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation has been performed since the late 1980s. Excellent long-term outcomes have been achieved; the rates of graft survival among these patients are currently similar to those of recipients of ABO-compatible grafts. Our single-center experience describing the immunosuppressive protocols, complications, and grafts survivals is documented in this study.

Patients and Methods

Among 123 patients with end-stage renal disease who underwent living donor kidney transplantation between January 1999 and December 2010, 25 cases were ABO-incompatible grafts. All of these patients were followed until August 2011. Analyzing these patients, we focused on their immunosuppressive protocols, complications, and graft survivals.

Results

Patient and graft survival rates were 100%. One patient experienced antibody-mediated rejection and an intractable acute cellular rejection episode, 1 patient an antibody-mediated rejection, and 6 patients had acute cellular rejection episodes. However, there were no severe complications.

Conclusion

Although ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation is a high-risk procedure, a short-term graft survival rate of 100% may be expected due to recent significant improvements in desensitization and recipient management.     

The Outcome of Induction Therapy With Monoclonal Antibodies in Kidney Transplantation Among Iranian Patients: A Prospective Study

Introduction

The administration of interlukin-2 receptor antagonists for induction therapy has reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes in kidney transplantation. Although some studies have investigated the efficacy of these monoclonal antibodies, there is little experience among Iranian kidney transplant recipients.

Materials and Methods

Forty-three patients randomly divided into 2 groups were prospectively followed for 3.4 years. Eighteen patients received 2 doses of basiliximab (group I) and another 25 patients received 5 doses of daclizumab (group II). The posttransplantation complications, last serum creatinine level, as well as graft and patient survival rates were compared to investigate the efficacy of these therapies.

Results

Among 43 patients, 11.6% experienced acute rejection episodes: 22.2% in group I and 4% in group II (P > .05). In this study, 4.6% of recipients underwent graft nephrectomy: 11.1% in group I and 4% in group II (P > .05). The mortality rate was 4.6%: 5.5% in group I and 4% in group II (P > .05). The mean serum creatinine level was 1.47 ± 0.7 mg/dL. Although it was lower in group I, the difference was not significant. The 1-year graft and patient survival rates were 90.6% and 95.3%, respectively, with no significant differences between the groups.

Discussion

Although induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies may reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes, graft and patient survival rates were unchanged compared with conventional therapies. Also, there were no significant differences between the results of induction therapy with basiliximab and daclizumab.     

Immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab,a chimeric anti[ndash ]interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody,in combination with azathioprine-containing triple therapy in liver transplant recipients

Acute graft rejection remains a major problem among additional sequelae in liver transplant recipients. Basiliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody with high affinity for the CD25 chain of the interleukin-2 receptor, has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients. This single-arm, open-label, multicenter study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis in adult patients undergoing first elective liver transplantation. One hundred one patients (70 hepatitis C virus [HCV]-negative patients, 31 HCV-positive patients) were administered basiliximab, 20 mg, by intravenous bolus injection the day of transplantation (day 0) and day 4. In addition, all patients were administered triple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine. The efficacy of basiliximab was assessed by conventional parameters, and tolerability was assessed by the incidence of adverse events, infections, and laboratory test result abnormalities. At 6 months, the incidence of first acute biopsy-confirmed rejection episodes was 22.8%. Rejections were more frequent in the HCV-positive (29.0%) than HCV-negative subgroup (20.0%; P = .441). No rejection episode was graded histologically as severe, and no patient required antibody therapy for the management of acute rejection. Ten patients (9.9%) required treatment with tacrolimus for acute rejection episodes. Patient and graft survival rates at 12 months were 90.1% and 88.1%, respectively. Basiliximab caused no injection-site reactions, anaphylaxis, or cytokine release syndrome. Five malignancies were reported at 12 months: of these, three malignancies predated transplantation surgery. Compared with earlier studies, the addition of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis to triple immunosuppressive therapy provides increased efficacy in reducing the incidence of acute rejection episodes, with no clinically significant increase in adverse events. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:123-131.)     

Immunoprophylaxis with Basiliximab Compared with Antithymocyte Globulin in Renal Transplant Patients Receiving MMF-containing Triple Therapy

Acute graft rejection remains a major problem in renal transplant recipients, and there is no consensus on the optimal immunosuppressive strategy. Immunoprophylaxis with Thymoglobulin or basiliximab has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes and graft loss following kidney transplantation. This open, randomized, multicenter study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of basiliximab (20mg day 0-day 4) plus early cyclosporine from day 0 (n = 50) compared with Thymoglobulin plus delayed cyclosporine (n = 50) in adult kidney transplant patients. In addition, all patients received steroids and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at standard doses from day 0. Patient and graft survival rates at 12 months were 98 and 94% in the basiliximab group, respectively, compared with 100 and 96% in the Thymoglobulin' group. The incidences of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (8.0% in each group) and treatment failure (14% in the basiliximab group vs. 8% in the Thymoglobulin group) were comparable in the two groups. There was a non-significant tendency to more dialysis (14 vs. 6%), and fewer cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections (p = 0.005) in the basiliximab group, but the percentage of clinical CMV was not different between the two groups (6 vs. 12%). Both strategies give excellent results, despite the differences in patterns, in nonhyperimmunized patients receiving their first cadaveric renal allograft.     

A prospective, pilot study of early corticosteroid cessation in high-immunologic-risk patients: the Cincinnati experience

BACKGROUND: The first prospective trial of steroid withdrawal dedicated to high-immunologic-risk patients is reported herein. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled prospectively in an IRB-approved HIPAA-compliant protocol. Immunosuppression included corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) at 7 days, tacrolimus (target trough level 4 to 8 ng/mL), sirolimus (target trough level 8 to 12 ng/mL), and Mycophenolate Mofetil (2 g/d). Induction with daclizumab (2 mg/kg) on posttransplant days (PTD) 0 and 14 was administered to the first 10 patients. The protocol for the next 15 patients was modified because of high acute rejection rates to include received T-cell-depleting antibody induction therapy with thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg) on PTDs 0 and 2 followed by daclizumab on Postoperative day (POD) 14. Recipient inclusion criteria included: (1) repeat transplant recipients; or (2) patients with a peak PRA > or =25%. All rejection episodes were diagnosed by biopsy and graded using Banff '97 criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled and median follow-up was 402 days. Forty percent of recipients were black, 68% of patients were repeat transplant recipients, 68% received deceased donor kidneys, and 36% had a peak flow PRA >25%. Overall acute rejection, graft survival, and patient survival rates of 40%, 88%, and 96%, respectively, were observed for the duration of the study. Acute rejection occurred in 6 of 10 patients (60%) with daclizumab induction; however, acute rejection rates fell to 27% when thymoglobulin was introduced (P = .1). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports our previous observations in a multivariate analysis of early CSWD patients, wherein polyclonal antibody induction therapy reduced acute rejection. High-immunologic-risk patients may be able to undergo early CSWD with acceptable rates of acute rejection.     

Steroid-free living-donor liver transplantation in adults

To examine the benefits of steroid avoidance in adult living donor liver transplantation, we compared the clinical courses of nine recipients receiving basiliximab or daclizumab and 13 historical patients who received steroids. The 1-year patient and graft survival and the incidence of acute cellular rejection were similar in both groups. The side effects of immunosuppression tended to be more frequent in the steroid group. Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA levels measured early after transplantation remained suppressed in the steroid-free group. Steroid avoidance was beneficial in the recipients, as both steroid side effects and recurrence of HCV could be avoided.     

Is it worth using daclizumab induction therapy with mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppressive regimens in live related donor kidney transplantation? A long-term follow up

Background/Aims The aim of this work is to determine the long-term therapeutic benefit(s) of daclizumab induction therapy with triple immunosuppressive protocols including prednisolone, cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the living related donor kidney transplantation. Methods Twenty-one adult recipients of their first kidney allograft were allocated to receive daclizumab with triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, CsA, and MMF). They were compared to 50 recipients of their first grafts who received a maintenance triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, CsA, and azathioprine). The patients were followed up for 5 years. Results Daclizumab group significantly experienced a marked reduction of acute rejection (7/21) when compared to the control group (31/50) with subsequent significant reduction of cumulative steroids doses at the end of 5 years. The overall incidence of post-transplant complications was comparable among the two treatment groups. There was no significant difference in patients and graft survival; 5-year patient and graft survival were 95.3%, 85.7% for daclizumab and 96%, 88% for control group, respectively. Conclusions Although prophylactic daclizumab with triple immunosuppressive protocol including MMF have drastically reduced the incidence of acute rejections, the graft and patient survival are unchanged in this long-term follow up.     

Use of basiliximab with mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Randomized, placebo-controlled studies have determined that administration of basiliximab (chimeric IL-2 receptor antagonist) decreases the acute rejection rate in kidney transplantation when used in combination with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids. We report our experience using basiliximab with mycophenolate mofetil, a calcineurin inhibitor, and steroids in kidney transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 127 patients who received their first kidney transplant between September 1, 1998, and December 30, 2000, including 59 who received basiliximab (22 living and 37 cadaveric donor recipients) and the 68 that did not receive this antibody (31 living and 37 cadaveric donor recipients). The groups were demographically comparable for risk factors such as race, peak of panel-reactive antibody, delayed graft function, donor age, and cold ischemia time. The analysis assessed serum creatinine levels, acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease incidence as well as patient and graft survival at 6 months. RESULTS: Serum creatinine levels were 3 +/- 3.1 and 2.6 +/- 2.5 mg/dL (P =.346) at discharge, 1.5 +/- 0.6 and 1.7 +/- 1.1 mg/dL (P =.098) at 1 month, and 1.5 +/- 0.7 and 1.6 +/- 0.7 mg/dL (P =.454) at 6 months posttransplantation for patients treated with versus without basiliximab, respectively. Only one episode of acute rejection was seen among patients treated with basiliximab within 1 month posttransplantation versus three episodes among patients treated without basiliximab (P =.382). Three patients (5.1%) treated with basiliximab and two patients (2.9%) treated without basiliximab developed acute rejection within 6 months posttransplantation (P =.536). Patient and graft survivals at 6 months posttransplantation were not significantly different between patients treated with versus without basiliximab (100% and 100% versus 100% and 98.3%, respectively). There was no increased incidence of cytomegalovirus infection with the use of basiliximab (5.1% vs 5.9%, P =.844). There was only one case of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease within 6 months posttransplantation in a patient treated without basiliximab. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the routine addition of basiliximab to a mycophenolate mofetil-based regimens does not appear to be warranted. A larger prospective randomized study with longer follow-up is needed to confirm these results.     

Histological Findings of Early Graft Biopsies in Old Donor Renal Transplant Patients Receiving Induction Therapy

Since recipients of transplants from elderly donors are exposed to an increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection episodes, administration of induction treatment represents an alternative to preserve renal mass and improve graft survival. We compared the evolution and histological findings of early graft biopsies among 38 recipients treated with Thymoglobulim (33.6%) versus 75 (66.4%) with basiliximab. No differences were observes in the rate of DGF (P = .39). Forty kidneys were biopsed during the first 2 weeks after transplantation: 9 in the Thymoglobulin group (23.68%) and 31 in the basiliximab group (41.3%). Histological evaluation showed: acute tabular necrosis in 7 (78%) Thymoglobulin patients versus 14 (45%) basiliximab patients, with calcineurin nephrotoxicity in 2 (22%) and 1 (3.2%), respectively. An acute rejection episode was not diagnosed in the Thymoglobulin group, but 13 patients (17.3%) in the basiliximab group experienced this complication (P = .006). Banff classification showed: 6 grade IA (19.4%), 1 grade IB (3.2%), 3 grade IIA (9.7%), 1 grade IIB (3.2%), and 2 grade III (6.5%). Six of these patients required rescue treatment with Thymoglobulin. Serum creatinine and proteinuria levels between the 2 groups were not different (P > .05). There were no differences in cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease (P = .152), admission due to infection (P = .120), or neoplasia (P = .29). Graft and patient survivals at 3 years did not show a difference. The histological findings revealed that low doses of Thymoglobulin were much more effective to prevent renal inflammation and acute rejection episodes than basiliximab among renal transplant recipients, albiet without differences in survival at a mean of 3 years follow-up.