Efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized,double-blind, 12-week,placebo-controlled trial followed by an open-label,long-term extension phase

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are poorly controlled with insulin and diet or exercise.

Study design: This was a randomized, double-blind, 12-week comparative trial of alogliptin and insulin versus placebo and insulin in 179 patients with T2DM followed by a 40-week, open-label phase in 169 patients on alogliptin and insulin.

Primary outcome measure: Change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to the end of double-blind phase (week 12).

Results: The change in HbA1c (least squares means) from baseline to week 12 was ?0.96% for the alogliptin and insulin group and ?0.29% for the placebo and insulin group. The point estimate (95% confidence interval) intergroup difference was ?0.66% ([?0.824%, ?0.503%]). In the alogliptin and insulin group, HbA1c started to decrease from week 2 onward and peaked by week 12. The proportions of patients who achieved HbA1c < 8.0, < 7.0 and < 6.0% at week 12 were significantly higher in alogliptin and insulin group (73.0, 23.3 and 1.1%) than in placebo and insulin group (25.0, 5.7 and 0%). Incidences of adverse effects were comparable between groups, with no relevant increases in hypoglycemia or weight gain seen.

Conclusions: Alogliptin 25 mg/day was effective and well tolerated when added to insulin in Japanese patients with inadequately controlled T2DM.     

Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin in combination with insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 16-week double-blind randomized controlled trial with a 36-week open-label extension

Background: We examined the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin as an add-on to insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Research design and methods: We randomized 240 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on insulin monotherapy to 5-mg saxagliptin or placebo as add-on therapy for a 16-week, double-blind period. All patients received 5-mg saxagliptin and insulin for an additional 36 weeks (open-label extension). Change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 16 was the main endpoint.

Results: At Week 16, the adjusted change in HbA1c from baseline increased by 0.51% with placebo and decreased by 0.40% with saxagliptin (difference ?0.92% [95% confidence interval ?1.07%, ?0.76%; p < 0.001]). In patients receiving saxagliptin, reductions in HbA1c at Week 16 were maintained to Week 52, while switching from placebo to saxagliptin resulted in a similar reduction in HbA1c. The incidence of hypoglycemia was not markedly increased with saxagliptin versus placebo in the double-blind period and did not increase substantially during the open-label extension period. The efficacy and safety of saxagliptin was similar between the elderly and non-elderly patient groups.

Conclusions: Adding saxagliptin to ongoing insulin therapy improved glycemic control and was well tolerated in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin add-on to insulin monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 16-week,randomized, double-blind,placebo-controlled trial with an open-label period

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of teneligliptin as add-on to insulin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Research design and methods: In a 16-week, double-blind period, 148 Japanese T2DM patients with inadequate glycemic control with insulin and diet/exercise therapies were randomized to placebo or teneligliptin 20 mg. In a subsequent 36-week, open-label period, all patients received teneligliptin once daily. The primary outcome measure was change in HbA1c at the end of the double-blind period.

Results: The difference between placebo and teneligliptin in change in HbA1c in the double-blind period (least squares mean ± SE) was ?0.80% ± 0.11%; teneligliptin was superior (ANCOVA, P < 0.001). The HbA1c-lowering effect of teneligliptin was maintained throughout the open-label period. The incidence of adverse events was 53.5% with placebo and 44.2% with teneligliptin in the double-blind period, 66.7% in the placebo/teneligliptin group in the open-label period, and 77.9% in the teneligliptin/teneligliptin group over both double-blind/open-label periods. The incidence of hypoglycemic symptoms was 11.1% in the placebo/teneligliptin group in the open-label period and 27.3% in the teneligliptin/teneligliptin group over both double-blind/open-label periods.

Conclusion: Teneligliptin was effective and well tolerated in Japanese T2DM patients with inadequate glycemic control.

Clinical trial registration: NCT02081599     

Efficacy and safety of alogliptin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized,double-blind,dose-ranging comparison with placebo,followed by a long-term extension study

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the efficacy and safety of different dosages of alogliptin with that of placebo and voglibose in drug-naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by diet and exercise.     

Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Background: Currently available antihyperglycemic agents (AHAs), despite being effective, do not provide adequate glycemic control in some cases and are associated with side effects. A sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, canagliflozin, is a newer AHA, which acts by decreasing the reabsorption of filtered glucose thereby elevating the urinary glucose excretion in diabetics.

Areas covered: This systematic review was completed to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of canagliflozin in T2DM. A literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted for randomized clinical trials of canagliflozin as an AHA by applying predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Total 13 studies were included in the systematic review. The main outcomes assessed were change in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose.

Expert opinion: Canagliflozin monotherapy or combination therapy has the potential to decrease inadequately controlled hyperglycemia in T2DM. It acts by a novel insulin independent mechanism which complements the action of the existing AHA and improves glycemic control and decreases the body weight. Safety profile of canagliflozin indicates lower number of hypoglycemic episodes. Some manageable adverse events include genital mycotic infections, urinary tract infections, osmotic diuresis-related events etc. These findings affirm the utility of canagliflozin in T2DM; however, data on long-term safety and efficacy are needed.     

Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and exercise: a 24-week,randomized, double-blind,placebo-controlled,Phase III study

Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin monotherapy, a sodium/glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients.

Methods: In this double-blind, multi-centre Phase III study, patients aged ≥ 20 years with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 7.0 – 10.0% on diet/exercise therapy alone received placebo or canagliflozin (100 or 200 mg) once daily for 24 weeks. The main outcome measure was the change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 24.

Results: The changes in HbA1c (?0.74 and ?0.76 vs + 0.29%), fasting plasma glucose (1 mg/dl = 0.0555 mmol/l; ?31.6 and ?31.9 vs + 3.7 mg/dl), 2-h plasma glucose after 75-g glucose load (?84.9 and ?79.0 vs ?0.5 mg/dl), body weight (percent change: ?3.76 and ?4.02 vs ?0.76%) and systolic blood pressure (?7.88 and ?6.24 vs ?2.72 mmHg) were significantly greater with 100 and 200 mg canagliflozin than with placebo (all, p < 0.05). Genital infections in females (6.5, 6.3 and 0%) and asymptomatic hypoglycemia (4.4, 5.6 and 2.2%), but not symptomatic hypoglycemia (2.2, 1.1 and 1.1%), were more frequent in the 100- and 200-mg groups than in the placebo group.

Conclusion: Canagliflozin significantly improved glycemic control and was well tolerated.     

钠-葡萄糖转运蛋白2抑制剂与2型糖尿病患者恶性肿瘤发生风险的Meta分析

目的： 系统评价钠-葡萄糖转运蛋白2（sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors,SGLT2）抑制剂的使用与2型糖尿病患者肿瘤发病的关系,为明确二者之间关系提供循证医学依据。方法： 以"钠-葡萄糖转运蛋白2（SGLT2）抑制剂、达格列净（dapagliflozin）、坎格列净（canagliflozin）、恩格列净（empagliflozin）、2型糖尿病、肿瘤"等为关键词,通过PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library及万方、中国知网（CNKI）、维普中文期刊（VIP）等数据库检索2021年2月以前发表的中英文文献,确定符合条件的随机对照试验（randomized controlled trials,RCTs）。运用RevMan 5.3和Stata 15.0软件进行统计学处理。结果： 最终纳入17篇文献,共35 299例患者,其中1 072例2型糖尿病患者罹患恶性肿瘤。Meta分析结果表明,与对照组相比,SGLT2抑制剂与总体肿瘤风险增加无显著相关性（RR=0.98,95% CI：0.96~1.36）。不同SGLT2抑制剂对肿瘤发生的风险无显著相关性（RR=0.92,95% CI：0.81~1.04）。结论： 目前来自短期随机对照试验的证据并未表明使用SGLT2抑制剂的2型糖尿病患者有增加发生恶性肿瘤的风险。     

Safety of ipragliflozin in elderly Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (STELLA-ELDER): Interim results of a post-marketing surveillance study

Objective: To determine the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with ipragliflozin in elderly Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Research design and methods: We report interim results of a postmarketing surveillance survey. Japanese physicians recorded ADRs in elderly patients (≥65 years old) who were first prescribed with ipragliflozin within 3 months of its launch (April 2014).

Main outcome measures: Incidence of ADRs within 1 year of starting treatment with ipragliflozin.

Results: 898 ADRs occurred in 721/7,170 patients (10.06%). Skin complication-, volume depletion-, genital infection-, polyuria/pollakiuria-, urinary tract infection-, and hypoglycemia-related ADRs occurred in 2.23%, 1.90%, 1.45%, 1.32%, 0.77%, and 0.32%, respectively. ADRs were classified as serious in 44 (0.61%) patients. Half of the ADRs occurred within 30 days of starting treatment. There were no cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis. Most (92.1%) of the ADRs resolved or improved. Glycated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, body weight, and systolic blood pressure decreased by 0.6% (baseline 7.8%), 22.7 mg/dL (baseline 163.0 mg/dL), 2.3 kg (baseline 67.4 kg), and 3.1 mmHg (baseline 133.2 mmHg), respectively, from baseline to treatment discontinuation/last visit.

Conclusions: Ipragliflozin is well tolerated and reduced surrogate endpoints in elderly Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02297620     

Safety and efficacy of canagliflozin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: post hoc subgroup analyses according to body mass index in a 52-week open-label study

Background: The safety and efficacy of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in non-obese compared with obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is unknown.

Methods: We conducted post hoc analyses of the results of a 52-week open-label study of Japanese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients treated with 100 or 200 mg canagliflozin. Patients were divided into four subgroups according to their baseline body mass index (BMI): group I, BMI < 22 kg/m²; group II, BMI ≥ 22 to < 25 kg/m²; group III, BMI ≥ 25 to < 30 kg/m² and group IV, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m².

Results: The overall safety was similar among the four BMI subgroups, although there were slight differences in terms of the incidences of hypoglycemia, asymptomatic hypoglycemia, female genital infections and proportions of patients with total ketone body levels exceeding 1000 μmol/l at any time for both canagliflozin doses. Hemoglobin A1c, fasting plasma glucose and body weight decreased significantly from baseline to week 52 at both canagliflozin doses. The changes in hemoglobin A1c, and fasting plasma glucose were not significantly different among the four BMI subgroups for either dose.

Conclusion: Canagliflozin was tolerated in patients irrespective of their BMI at the start of treatment, although some caution may be needed.     

A phase II,randomized, placebo-controlled,double-blind,multi-dose study of SRT2104, a SIRT1 activator,in subjects with type 2 diabetes

Aim

SRT2104 is a selective activator of SIRT1. In animal models, SRT2104 improves glucose homeostasis and increases insulin sensitivity. We evaluated the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of SRT2104, and its effects on glycaemic control, in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Method

Type 2 diabetics with glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7.5% and ≤10.5%, fasting glucose ≥160 and ≤240 mg dl⁻¹, and on stable doses of metformin were evenly randomized to placebo or SRT2104 0.25 g, 0.5 g, 1.0 g or 2.0 g, administered orally once daily for 28 days. Changes in fasting and post-prandial glucose and insulin were analyzed.

Results

Safety evaluation found no major differences between groups in the frequency of adverse events. SRT2104 concentrations did not increase in a dose-proportional fashion. Significant variability in exposure was observed. Treatment with SRT2104 did not lead to any consistent, dose-related changes in glucose or insulin. Day 28 change from baseline (mean (SD)): fasting glucose (mmol l⁻¹) = −1.17 (2.42), −1.11 (3.45), −0.52 (2.60), −0.97 (2.83) and −0.15 (2.38) for placebo, 0.25 g, 0.5 g, 1.0 g and 2.0 g, respectively. Day 28 change from baseline (mean (SD)): fasting insulin (mmol l⁻¹) = 1.0 (51.66), 8.9 (95.04), −6.9 (41.45), 4.1 (57.16) and 15.2 (138.79) for placebo, 0.25 g, 0.5 g, 1.0 g and 2.0 g, respectively) Treatment with SRT2104 was associated with improvement in lipid profiles.

Conclusion

Treatment with SRT2104 for 28 days did not result in improved glucose or insulin control which is likely due to the observed pharmacokinetics which were not dose proportional and had large between subject variability.     

Real-world evidence for the safety of ipragliflozin in elderly Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (STELLA-ELDER): final results of a post-marketing surveillance study

Objective: To investigate the real-world safety of ipragliflozin in elderly Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Research design and methods: Japanese patients (≥65 years old) who were first prescribed ipragliflozin within 3 months after its launch in April 2014 were registered in this post-marketing surveillance (PMS). Final data collection was in July 2015. Survey items included demographics, treatments, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), vital signs, and laboratory variables.

Results: The PMS included 8505 patients (4181 males/4324 females). The mean age and diabetes duration were 72.3 years and 10.6 years, respectively. In 84.3% of patients, ipragliflozin was prescribed at 50 mg/day, which was continued unchanged. Overall, 16.91% of patients experienced 1880 ADRs, and 165 ADRs were classified as serious in 127 patients (1.49%). ADRs of special interest included skin complications, volume depletion, polyuria/pollakiuria, genital infection, urinary tract infection, renal disorders, hypoglycemia, cerebrovascular disease, cardiovascular disease, malignant tumor, fracture, and ketone body-related events.

Conclusions: This 1-year PMS revealed probable ADRs in elderly Japanese patients with T2DM prescribed ipragliflozin in real-world settings, with no new safety concerns. The risk factors for ADRs varied but could be rationalized. The results should help physicians to identify possible treatment-emergent ADRs in ipragliflozin-treated patients.     

吡格列酮治疗2型糖尿病的双盲、随机、平行对照多中心临床研究

目的 :观察吡格列酮对 2型糖尿病病人血糖控制的疗效和安全性。方法 :多中心、随机双盲、安慰剂平行对照的为期 12wk试验。吡格列酮组12 0例 ,安慰剂组 12 0例。结果 :吡格列酮组空腹和餐后 2h血糖治疗后较前皆明显下降 :(1.5±s1.8)mmol·L- 1和 (2 .2± 2 .8)mmol·L- 1(P <0 .0 1) ,糖化血红蛋白从 (7.5± 1.2 ) %下降至 (6 .7± 1.3) %。而安慰剂组则从 (7.3± 1.4 ) %上升至(7.6± 1.2 ) % ,2组间存在非常显著差异 (P <0 .0 1)。但 2组治疗前后的空腹及餐后 2h胰岛素变化无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5 )。吡格列酮组的HDL明显高于安慰剂组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,而TG/HDL比值则无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5 )。吡格列酮组和安慰剂组的不良反应发生率分别为 6 .0 %和 4 .4 % ,2组间无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 :吡格列酮有良好的降糖作用 ,还可改善脂代谢 ,而且不良反应较低     

Ertugliflozin as a monotherapy for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are novel, potent oral anti-diabetic agents in a β-cell function-independent manner, inhibiting SGLT2-mediated renal glucose reabsorption and thus increasing urinary glucose excretion. Ertugliflozin (Steglatro^TM) is a new oral SGLT2 inhibitor for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as a monotherapy or in combination with other anti-diabetic agents.

Areas covered: This review summarizes the collected data concerning the pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, as well as safety and tolerability profiles of ertugliflozin given as a monotherapy for the management of T2DM.

Expert opinion: Good glycemic control is crucial to the management of T2DM, and accordingly, anti-diabetic agents with various anti-hyperglycemic mechanisms are developed one after another. Based on the available clinical trials of ertugliflozin as a monotherapy for T2DM, it could be found that ertugliflozin effectively improves the glycemic control, body weight and blood pressure of patients with a low risk of hypoglycemia. It is also found that ertugliflozin moderately reduces their blood pressure, which is beneficial for decreasing the risk of cardiovascular disease. These attributes show the good potential of ertugliflozin as an adjunct treatment to diet and exercise for improving glycemic control in patients with T2DM.     

Efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin across racial groups in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of the sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor ertugliflozin across racial groups in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: Pooled analysis of data from randomized, double-blind studies in the ertugliflozin phase III development program. Seven placebo- and comparator-controlled studies were used to assess safety (N?=?4859) and three placebo-controlled studies were used to assess efficacy (N?=?1544). Least-squares (LS) mean change from baseline was calculated for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Safety evaluation included overall and prespecified adverse events (AEs).

Results: At Week 26, ertugliflozin provided a greater reduction in HbA1c, body weight and SBP versus placebo in all racial subgroups. The placebo-adjusted LS mean change (95% confidence interval) from baseline in HbA1c was ?0.8% (?1.0, ?0.7) and ?1.0% (?1.1, ?0.8) with ertugliflozin 5?mg and 15?mg, respectively, in the White subgroup, ?0.7% (?1.2, ?0.2) and ?0.8% (?1.3, ?0.3) in the Black subgroup, and ?0.8% (?1.1, ?0.5) and ?1.0% (?1.3, ?0.8) in the Asian subgroup. The incidences of overall AEs, serious AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation from study medication were similar between the ertugliflozin 5?mg, 15?mg and non-ertugliflozin groups within each racial subgroup. The incidence of female genital mycotic infection (GMI) was higher with ertugliflozin than non-ertugliflozin across all racial subgroups. The incidence of male GMI was higher with ertugliflozin than non-ertugliflozin in the White sub-group; however, there were few male GMI events in the non-White subgroups.

Conclusions: In patients with T2DM, treatment with ertugliflozin improved HbA1c, body weight and SBP across all racial subgroups. Ertugliflozin had a generally similar safety profile across racial subgroups and was generally well tolerated.

Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT01986855, NCT01999218, NCT01958671, NCT02099110, NCT02036515, NCT02033889, and NCT02226003.     

Sotagliflozin as a potential treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Introduction: SGLT1 is the primary transporter responsible for the absorption of glucose and galactose in the intestine, while SGLT2 and SGLT1 are both involved in the renal reabsorption of glucose. SGLT2 inhibitors are a new class of oral antidiabetic drugs, acting by increasing urinary glucose excretion (UGE). They offer the advantages of a reduced risk of hypoglycaemia, a decrease in body weight and blood pressure and an efficacy at all stages of type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Areas covered: Herein, the authors focus specifically on sotagliflozin (LX4211), the first-in-class dual SGLT1/SGLT2 inhibitor. Original publications in English were selected as the basis of this review. Clinical trials were identified using the Clinicaltrial.gov database.

Expert opinion: By a potential additional mechanism of action on intestinal glucose absorption linked to SGLT1 inhibition, sotagliflozin differentiates from SGLT2 inhibitors by reducing postprandial glucose excursion and insulin secretion, as well as by increasing GLP-1 secretion. Despite a weaker effect on UGE than selective SGLT2 inhibitors, sotagliflozin is as effective as SGLT2 inhibitors on HbA1C reduction, with a similar safety profile in short-term studies. While sotagliflozin was first assessed in T2DM, it is now in phase 3 development as an adjuvant treatment in patients with T1DM after positive results from a pilot study.     

Empagliflozin and linagliptin combination therapy for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Introduction: Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) fail to achieve the desired A1c goal because the antidiabetic medications used do not correct the underlying pathophysiologic abnormalities and monotherapy is not sufficiently potent to reduce the A1c to the 6.5 – 7.0% range. Insulin resistance and islet (beta and alpha) cell dysfunction are major pathophysiologic abnormalities in T2DM. We examine combination therapy with linagliptin plus empagliflozin as a therapeutic approach for the treatment of inadequately controlled T2DM patients.

Areas covered: A literature search of all human diabetes, metabolism and general medicine journals from year 2000 to the present was conducted. Glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) deficiency/resistance contributes to islet cell dysfunction by impairing insulin secretion and increasing glucagon secretion. DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) improve pancreatic islet function by augmenting glucose-dependent insulin secretion and decreasing elevated plasma glucagon levels. Linagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, reduces HbA1c, is weight neutral, has an excellent safety profile and a low risk of hypoglycemia. The expression of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) in the proximal renal tubule is upregulated in T2DM, causing excess reabsorption of filtered glucose. The SGLT2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), empagliflozin, improves HbA_1c by causing glucosuria and ameliorating glucotoxicity. It also decreases weight and blood pressure, and has a low risk of hypoglycemia.

Expert opinion: The once daily oral combination of linagliptin plus empagliflozin does not increase the risk of hypoglycemia and tolerability and discontinuation rates are similar to those with each as monotherapy. At HbA1c values below 8.5% linagliptin/empagliflozin treatment produces an additive effect, whereas above 8.5%, there is a less than additive reduction with combination therapy compared with the effect of each agent alone. Linagliptin/empagliflozin addition is a logical combination in patients with T2DM, especially those with an HbA1c < 8.5%.     

Long-term safety and efficacy of tofogliflozin,a selective inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2, as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antidiabetic agents in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: multicenter,open-label,randomized controlled trials

Objective: To evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of tofogliflozin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antidiabetic agents, we conducted 52-week, open-label, randomized controlled trials.

Research design and methods: The single-agent trial included patients with inadequate glycemic control on diet and exercise, whereas the add-on trial included those uncontrolled with any of the oral antidiabetic agents. In both trials, patients were randomly assigned to receive tofogliflozin 20 or 40 mg once daily orally for 52 weeks.

Main outcome measures: Safety assessments.

Results: A total of 194 patients (65, 20-mg group; 129, 40-mg group) were enrolled into the single-agent trial, whereas 602 (178 and 424, respectively) were enrolled into the add-on trial. Tofogliflozin was well tolerated for 52 weeks in both trials with < 6% of treatment discontinuation because of adverse events in each treatment group. It also reduced hemoglobin A1c. In the single-agent trial, mean reductions at 52 weeks were 0.67 and 0.66% in the 20- and 40-mg groups, respectively. In the add-on trial, mean reductions ranged from 0.71 to 0.93% across the subgroups by dose and background therapy.

Conclusion: Tofogliflozin was well tolerated and showed sustained efficacy in both trials.