The relationship between exercise capacity and masked hypertension in sedentary patients with diabetes mellitus

Aim: Although exaggerated blood pressure responses (EBPR) to exercise have been related to future hypertension and masked hypertension (MHT), the relationship between exercise capacity and MHT remains unclear. A sedentary life style has been related to increased cardiovascular mortality, diabetes mellitus (DM), and hypertension. In this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between exercise capacity and MHT in sedentary patients with DM.

Methods: This study included 85 sedentary and normotensive patients with DM. Each patient’s daily physical activity level was assessed according to the INTERHEART study. All patients underwent an exercise treadmill test, and exercise duration and capacity were recorded. Blood pressure (BP) was recorded during all exercise stages and BP values ≥200/110?mmHg were accepted as EBPR. MHT was diagnosed in patients having an office BP <140/90?mmHg and a daytime ambulatory BP >135/85?mmHg. Patients were divided into two groups according to their ambulatory BP monitoring (MHT and normotensive group).

Results: The prevalence of MHT was 28.2%. Exercise duration and capacity were lower in the MHT group than in the normotensive group (p?p?=?0.03). According to a multivariate regression, exercise capacity (OR: 0.61, CI95%: 0.39–0.95, p?=?0.03), EBPR (OR: 9.45, CI95%: 1.72–16.90, p?=?0.01), and the duration of DM (OR: 0.84, CI95%: 0.71–0.96, p?=?0.03) were predictors of MHT.

Conclusion: Exercise capacity, EBPR, and the duration of DM were predictors of MHT in sedentary subjects with DM.     

Effects of daily walking on office,home and 24-h blood pressure in hypertensive patients

Abstract

Aerobic exercise has been recommended in the management of hypertension. However, few studies have examined the effect of walking on ambulatory blood pressure (BP), and no studies have employed home BP monitoring. We investigated the effects of daily walking on office, home, and 24-h ambulatory BP in hypertensive patients. Sixty-five treated or untreated patients with essential hypertension (39 women and 26 men, 60?±?9 years) were examined in a randomized cross-over design. The patients were asked to take a daily walk of 30–60?min to achieve 10?000 steps/d for 4 weeks, and to maintain usual activities for another 4 weeks. The number of steps taken and home BP were recorded everyday. Measurement of office and ambulatory BP, and sampling of blood and urine were performed at the end of each period. The average number of steps were 5349?±?2267/d and 10?049?±?3403/d in the control and walking period, respectively. Body weight and urinary sodium excretion did not change. Office, home, and 24-h BP in the walking period were lower compared to the control period by 2.6?±?9.4/1.3?±?4.9?mmHg (p?<?0.05), 1.6?±?6.8/1.5?±?3.7?mmHg (p?<?0.01), and 2.4?±?7.6/1.8?±?5.3?mmHg (p?<?0.01), respectively. Average 24-h heart rate and serum triglyceride also decreased significantly. The changes in 24-h BP with walking significantly correlated with the average 24-h BP in the control period. In conclusion, daily walking lowered office, home, and 24-h BP, and improved 24-h heart rate and lipid metabolism in hypertensive patients. However, the small changes in BP may limit the value of walking as a non-pharmacologic therapy for hypertension.     

Evaluation of prehypertension and masked hypertension rate among clinically normotensive patients

Background: The present cross-sectional study was aimed to identify pre-hypertension and masked hypertension rate in clinically normotensive adults in relation to socio-demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters. Methods: A total of 161 clinically normotensive adults with office blood pressure (OBP) <140/90?mmHg without medication were included in this single-center cross-sectional study. OBP, home BP (HBP) recordings and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) were used to identify rates of true normotensives, true pre-hypertensives and masked hypertensives. Data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected in each subject and evaluated with respect to true normotensive vs. pre-hypertensive patients with masked hypertension or true pre-hypertensive. Target organ damage (TOD) was evaluated in masked hypertensives based on laboratory investigation. Results: Masked hypertension was identified in 8.7% of clinically normotensives. Alcohol consumption was significantly more common in masked hypertension than in true pre-hypertension (28.6 vs. 0.0%, p?=?0.020) with risk ratio of 2.7 (95% CI 1.7–4.4). Patients with true pre-hypertension and masked hypertension had significantly higher values for body mass index, waist circumference, systolic and diastolic OBP and HBP (p?<?0.05 for each) compared to true normotensive subjects. ABPM revealed significantly higher values for day-time and night-time systolic and diastolic BP (p?=?0.002 for night-time diastolic BP, p?<?0.001 for others) in masked hypertension than true pre-hypertension. Conclusions: Given that the associations of pre-hypertension with TOD might be attributable to the high prevalence of insidious presentation of masked hypertension among pre-hypertensive individuals, ABPM seems helpful in early identification and management of masked hypertension in the pre-hypertensive population.     

Diagnostic criteria of white coat hypertension (WCH): consequences for the implications of WCH for target organs

In a sample comprising 51 normotensive subjects and 51 subjects with in-clinic arterial hypertension [blood pressures (BPs) > or = 140/90 mmHg), we investigated the prevalence of target organ damage [left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and retinal vasculopathy] in white coat hypertension (WCH) groups defined using: (a) the "optimal ambulatory BP" criterion of the Seventh International Consensus Conference (in-clinic BPs >140/90 mmHg, daytime mean BPs < 130/80 mmHg) and (b) the "normal ambulatory BP" criterion proposed in 1997 by Verdecchia and co-workers (in-clinic BPs >140/ 90 mmHg, daytime mean BPs < 135/85 mmHg), and we compared the results with those obtained for the normotensive group and for a WCH group defined as in a 1996 study of the same data. We found that the newer criteria did not alter the conclusions reached in 1996: namely, that WCH constitutes a state of risk intermediate between normotension and sustained hypertension, which demands in-depth evaluation and active monitoring, if not immediate therapy. We also found that when the WCH group was defined as those patients with in-clinic BPs > or = 140/90 mmHg and 24-h mean BPs < 121/78 mmHg, the prevalence of target organ damage was similar to that found in the control group. We conclude that if WCH status is to imply absence of elevated risk of target organ damage, then the ambulatory BP threshold defining WCH should be lower than the upper limit of ambulatory BPs among subjects who are normotensive in the clinic. The desirability of predicting target organ damage in both hypertensive and normotensive subjects using criteria combining in-clinic BPs, daytime mean ambulatory BPs and night-time mean ambulatory BPs is suggested.     

Negative association between plasma aldosterone concentration/plasma renin activity and morning blood pressure surge in never-treated hypertensive patients

Morning blood pressure (BP) surge (MS) has been known to be a predictor of cardiovascular events. Currently, few studies have evaluated the underlying mechanism underlying MS, which may include neurohormonal factors and the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS). This study aimed to examine plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and plasma renin activity (PRA) and BP parameters with or without MS in never-treated subjects with essential hypertension. This cross-sectional study included a total of 261 patients (mean age: 48.8 years; 60.5% male) with never-treated essential hypertension who were registered in a working group at The Catholic University of Korea. The patients were divided into the MS group, which was defined as having the highest quartile of morning BP increase from sleep (>31?mmHg; n?=?66) and the non-MS group (≤31?mmHg; n?=?195). We collected 24-h ambulatory BP, pulse wave velocity, ankle brachial index, PAC and PRA from all patients. The measured PAC and PRA were lower in the MS group than in the non-MS group (PAC: 9.0?±?5.4?ng/dl versus 12.2?±?8.7?ng/dl, p?p?=?0.002). The MS group had greater variations in daytime, nighttime and 24-h systolic blood pressure (SBPs) than the non-MS group (24-h SBP: 15.6?±?4.4?mm Hg for the non-MS group and 18.9?±?4.9?mmHg for the MS group; p?相似文献   

Left ventricular diastolic function evaluated by the E/e’ ratio is impaired in patients with masked uncontrolled hypertension

Background: Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUH), defined as controlled office blood pressure (BP) but uncontrolled out-of-office BP in treated hypertensives, is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. We tested the hypothesis that MUH is associated with a greater degree of diastolic dysfunction than controlled hypertension (CH) or uncontrolled hypertension (UH).

Methods and results: We studied 299 treated patients who had at least one cardiovascular risk factor (age, 63?±?10 years; male sex, 43%), consisting of 94 (31.4%) patients with UH, 46 (15.4%) with MUH, 56 (18.7%) with treated white-coat hypertension (WCH), and 103 (34.4%) with CH. We performed office and home BP monitoring, electrocardiography, echocardiography and blood tests. Diastolic dysfunction was defined as an E-wave to e’-wave (E/e’) ratio ≥8 measured by Doppler echocardiography. The value of E/e’ was higher in the MUH (8.3?±?2.7) and UH (8.3?±?2.7) groups than in the CH group (7.3?±?2.3; p?=?0.08, p?=?0.02, respectively). In multivariable analysis, MUH was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of diastolic dysfunction than CH (odds ratio 2.90 versus CH, p?Conclusions: MUH and UH were associated with a greater degree of diastolic dysfunction than CH. Even in treated patients, out-of-office BP is important to stratify the risk of cardiovascular disease.     

Masked uncontrolled hypertension: Prevalence and predictors

Background

There are limited data on ‘masked uncontrolled hypertension’ (MUCH) in patients with treated and apparently well-controlled BP is unknown.

Toward a Definition of Masked Hypertension and White-Coat Hypertension among Hemodialysis Patients

Summary

Background and objectives

Among people with essential hypertension, ambulatory BP measurement is superior to BP obtained in the clinic in predicting cardiovascular outcomes. In part, this is because it can detect white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension. Whether the same is true for hemodialysis patients is not known.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

Using a threshold of 140/80 mmHg for median midweek dialysis-unit BP and 135/85 mmHg for 44-hour ambulatory BP, we defined four categories of BP: sustained normotension (SN), white-coat hypertension (WCH), masked hypertension (MHTN), and sustained hypertension (SHTN).

Results

Among 355 long-term hemodialysis patients, the prevalence of SN was 35%, WCH 15%, MHTN 15%, and SHTN 35%. Over a mean follow-up of 29.6 (SD 21.7) months, 102 patients died (29%), yielding a crude mortality rate of 121/1000 patient-years. Unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted analyses showed increasing all-cause mortality with increasing severity of hypertension (unadjusted hazard ratios from SN, WCH, MHTN, SHTN: 1, 1.12, 1.70, 1.80, respectively [P for trend < 0.01]; adjusted hazard ratios: 1, 1.30, 1.36, 1.87, respectively [P for trend 0.02]). When a predialysis BP threshold of 140/90 mmHg was used to classify patients into BP categories, the prevalence of SN was 24%, WCH 26%, MHTN 4%, and SHTN 47%. Hazard ratios for mortality were similar when compared with median midweek dialysis-unit BP.

Conclusions

As in the essential hypertension population, MHTN and WCH have prognostic significance. The prognostic value of BP obtained in the dialysis unit can be refined with ambulatory BP monitoring.     

Evaluation of white coat hypertension in children: importance of the definitions of normal ambulatory blood pressure and the severity of casual hypertension

To better describe the phenomenon of white coat hypertension (WCH) in children, we reviewed our single-center experience using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to determine: 1) how the choice of threshold limits for defining ambulatory hypertension affects the determination of WCH, and 2) whether the severity of casual hypertension predicts the occurrence of WCH. Using the same daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) data from 71 children (age 11.9 ± 3.4 years) with persistently elevated casual blood pressure (BP), the prevalence of WCH was compared using 95th percentile BP limits from the Task Force on High Blood Pressure in Children (TF) and from normative pediatric daytime ambulatory BP (ABP) data. To quantify casual hypertension severity, average clinic BP was divided by the patient-specific TF 95th percentile BP to generate a BP index (ie, BP index of 1.1 = 10% above 95th percentile). The WCH prevalence was lower by normative ABP criteria than by TF criteria (31% v 59%, P < .001), but did not vary significantly by age, gender, race, or body mass index. Logistic regression showed that higher systolic BP index (P < .001) or diastolic BP index (P < .01) was associated with a lower probability of WCH. Specifically, as systolic BP index increased from 1.0 to 1.2, the estimated probability of WCH decreased from 87% to 15%, respectively. These data suggest that the use of the lower TF limits, derived solely from resting BP measurements, may overestimate WCH prevalence in ambulatory children. In addition, these data confirm in children the finding in adults that WCH is highly prevalent when casual hypertension is borderline or mild, but uncommon when moderate or severe.     

White coat effect in treated and untreated patients with high office blood pressure. Relationship with pulse wave velocity and left ventricular mass index.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in hypertensive patients whether the white coat effect is associated with target-organ damage and whether it is modified by anti-hypertensive therapy. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study we evaluated blood pressure (BP) measured in the office and by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) as an index of aortic stiffness, and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in 88 subjects (aged 49 +/- 2 years) with white-coat hypertension (WCH, office BP > 140/90, daytime BP < 130/84 mmHg), 31 under antihypertensive therapy, 57 untreated, and in 115 patients with office and ambulatory hypertension (HT, aged 51 +/- 2 years, office BP > 140/90, daytime BP > 135/85), 65 under antihypertensive therapy, 50 untreated. In a longitudinal study in 15 patients with HT and in 11 patients with WCH we evaluated the influence of antihypertensive therapy (> 6 months) on office and ambulatory BP and on PWV. RESULTS: The intensity of the white coat effect (office BP-daytime BP) was greater in WCH than in HT. Taking all subjects, the white coat effect did not correlate with PWV (r = 0.08, ns) or with LVMI (r = 0.01, ns), whereas daytime BP correlated significantly with PWV (r = 0.41, p < 0.01) and with LVMI (r = 0.32, p < 0.05). WCH subjects showed lower PWV and LVMI than HT subjects. Treated and untreated WCH, with similar office and daytime BP, showed similar values of PWV and LVMI. Treated and untreated HT showed similar office BP values but treated HT showed lower daytime BP and PWV values. In the longitudinal study, antihypertensive therapy significantly reduced daytime BP and PWV values in the 15 HTs, whereas in the 11 WCH it did not alter daytime BP or PWV values. CONCLUSIONS: 1. In both WCH and HT (treated and untreated) the intensity of the white coat effect does not reflect either the severity of hypertension measured by target organ damage or the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment. 2. In WCH antihypertensive therapy does not improve either ambulatory BP values or damage to target organs.     

The clinical significance of white-coat and masked hypertension

OBJECTIVE: Self-measured blood pressure (BP) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring are used to define the arbitrary clinical categories of masked hypertension (MH) and white-coat hypertension (WCH). Severity of target organ damage and incidence of major cardiovascular events are greater in patients with MH than in patients whose BP is normal both inside and outside the doctor's office. METHODS: We reviewed studies that addressed the prognostic impact of MH and WCH. RESULTS: Overall, WCH was associated with a better outcome and MH to a poor outcome. We, however, need the criteria to identify the clinically normotensive patients at elevated pretest probability of MH in whom a broad use of self-measured home BP and 24-hour ambulatory BP as screening tests may be appropriate and cost effective. Clinical management of patients with MH should continue to be based on current guidelines and mostly related to target organ damage and associated clinical conditions because of the normal values of clinic BP in these patients. WCH is generally defined by the coexistence of persistently high office BP with normal daytime or 24-hour ABP. Daytime ABP normalcy has been defined by values<135/85 mmHg. Data, however, suggest that incidence of cardiovascular events tends to increase consistently above the cut-off value of 130/80 mmHg for daytime BP. CONCLUSION: The long-term outcome of patients with WCH remains uncertain. Data suggesting an increased risk of stroke need to be confirmed in wide-scale studies.     

Comparison of child adiposity indices in prediction of hypertension in early adulthood

We aimed to compare child body mass index (BMI) in prediction of hypertension in early adulthood with 4 other adiposity indices (waist circumference [WC], waist circumference‐to‐height ratio [WHtR], waist‐to‐hip ratio [WHR], and triceps skinfold [TSF]). The cohort from the China Health and Nutrition Survey 1993‐2011 consisted of 1444 adults aged 18‐36 years who were examined in childhood and early adulthood. Child adiposity indices and adult blood pressure (BP) were transformed into age‐, sex‐, and survey year‐specific Z‐scores. Adult hypertension was defined as BP ≥130/80 mm Hg as per the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. Adult hypertension prevalence was 32.9% during a mean follow‐up of 10.1 years. Childhood BMI showed stronger correlation with adult BP than WHR and TSF (P_S for difference <.05). Child BMI showed the better prediction of adult hypertension compared with WHtR, WHR, and TSF using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (P_S for difference <.05). Per SD change in the predictor, child BMI (relative risk [95% confidence interval], 1.11 [1.04‐1.18]) and WC (1.12 [1.05‐1.20]) were significantly associated with adult hypertension using covariate‐adjusted Poisson models with robust standard errors. Child BMI performed equally or better compared with 4 other adiposity indices in predicting adult hypertension.     

The impact of apelin and relaxin plasma levels in masked hypertension and white coat hypertension

Masked hypertension (HTN) and white coat hypertension represent two reverse forms of clinical HTN with questionable prognostic significance. Recent evidence supports that low apelin and relaxin plasma levels contribute to vascular damage accelerating atherogenesis and predisposing to HTN and cardiovascular (CV) events. The aim of this study was to compare apelin and relaxin plasma levels between patients with masked hypertension (MH) and those with white coat HTN (WCH). Overall, 130 patients not receiving antihypertensive therapy were studied. All patients underwent 24‐hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and office BP measurements. Plasma apelin and relaxin levels were measured by ELISA method. According to BP recordings, 24 subjects had MH (group A) and 32 had WCH (group B). Apelin (200 ± 111 pg/mL vs 305 ± 127 pg/mL, P < 0.01) and relaxin (35.2 ± 6.7 pg/mL vs 46.8 ± 23.6 pg/mL, P < 0.01) plasma levels were significantly lower in patients with MH compared to those with WCH, respectively. In conclusion, our findings showed that patients with MH had significantly lower apelin and relaxin levels compared to those with WCH. This observation implies an additional prognostic role for adipokines supporting the concept that MH is closer to essential HTN whereas WCH is a more benign condition.     

Postmenopausal hypertension,abdominal obesity,apolipoprotein and insulin resistance

This study aimed to evaluate the association of abdominal obesity, apolipoprotein and insulin resistance (IR) with the risk of hypertension in postmenopausal women. We analyzed a total of 242 women aged between 35 and 70 years. Blood pressure (BP), anthropometric indices, lipid profile, fasting glucose, insulin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and apolipoprotein concentrations were measured. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) was used to assess IR. Hypertension was defined as a systolic BP (SBP) ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥90 mmHg or current treatment with antihypertensive drugs. Women with hypertension showed significantly higher mean values of age, SBP and DBP, waist circumference (WC), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin, HOMAIR and the apolipoprotein B (apoB). When analyses were done according to the menopausal status, higher prevalence of hypertension was observed in postmenopausal women (72.8% vs. 26.0%, p < 0.001) compared to their premenopausal counterparts. Postmenopausal women showed also significantly higher mean values of SBP and DBP, WC, HOMAIR and apoB. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that SBP was significantly affected by WC (p = 0.034), apoB (p = 0.038) and log HOMAIR (p = 0.007) in postmenopausal women. The interaction models revealed significant interaction between WC, apoB and log HOMAIR (WC×apoB×log HOMAIR) on SBP (p = 0.001) adjusted for age. In a multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for age and apoB, WC (p = 0.001), log HOMAIR (p = 0.007) and menopause (p = 0.008) were significantly associated with higher risk for hypertension. These results suggest that changes in WC, apoB and IR accompanying menopause lead to a greater prevalence of hypertension in postmenopausal women.     

Relationship between joint national committee-VI classification of hypertension and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with hypertension diagnosed by casual blood pressure

Background: White-coat hypertension has been diagnosed arbitrarily based on different criteria. In 1997, the Joint National Committee-VI (JNC-VI) reported a new classification of hypertension and strongly emphasized the importance of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring. The report pronounced normal ABP values for the first time. Hypothesis: The study's aim was to clarify the relationship between casual blood pressure (BP) and ABP of patients with essential hypertension in each stage of JNC-VI classification, and the prevalence of white-coat hypertension diagnosed by using JNC-VI normal ABP criteria. Methods: Ambulatory blood pressure was monitored noninvasively in 232 patients with essential hypertension whose casual BP was ≥ 140/90 mmHg. The patients were classified according to JNC-VI classification, and their casual BP was compared with ABP. The criterion of white-coat hypertension was defined as casual BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg with normal ABP according to JNC-VI criteria (< 135/85 during daytime and < 120/75 during nighttime). Results: Mean ABP increased as the stage advanced, and the differences between casual BP and ABP also increased. There were considerable overlaps in the distribution of ABP among stages. The prevalence of white-coat hypertension was 13% overall: 30% of the patients with isolated systolic hypertension, 19% of those in stage 1,10% in stage 2, and 4% in stage 3. Conclusions: Classification of hypertension based on casual BP may not always correspond in severity to that based on ABP. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recommended by JNC-VI is very useful for the evaluation of hypertension to differentiate white-coat hypertension from true hypertension.     

The relationship between bone mineral density and blood pressure in the Korean elderly population: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2008–2011

Abstract

It is not clear whether the inverse relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and blood pressure (BP) could be generalizable to the general elderly population. We used data from the fourth and fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The study sample consisted of 8439 men and postmenopausal women aged 50 years and older. We evaluated the relationship between BMD and BP. When adjusted for covariates, femur neck T-score [coefficient?=??0.391, 95% confidence interval (CI) ?0.766 to ?0.016, p?=?0.041] had an inverse relationship with diastolic BP (DBP), whereas lumbar spine BMD (coefficient?=?0.395, 95% CI 0.058–7.752, p?=?0.047) and T-score (coefficient?=?0.458, 95% CI 0.005–0.911, p?=?0.047) had a positive relationship with systolic BP (SBP). When adjusted for confounding factors, SBP (128.67?±?0.979?mmHg versus 126.36?±?0.545?mmHg, p?=?0.026) and DBP (78.8?±?0.622?mmHg versus 77.27?±?0.283?mmHg, p?=?0.016) were significantly higher in femur neck osteoporosis subjects than non-osteoporosis subjects. However, there were no differences in BP in relation to lumbar spine osteoporosis. Femur neck osteoporosis (odds ratio?=?1.422, 95% CI 1.107–1.827, p?=?0.006) had a significant and positive relationship with hypertension, whereas the other parameters of BMD were not significantly related to hypertension. In conclusion, higher BP and hypertension were significantly and positively correlated with femur neck osteoporosis in men and postmenopausal women aged 50 years and older.     

Identification of subjects with white-coat hypertension and persistently normal ambulatory blood pressure

OBJECTIVE: To assess the spontaneous changes in clinic blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and left ventricular structure in untreated subjects with white-coat hypertension (WCH). DESIGN: A prospective observational study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 83 untreated subjects with WCH, 24 h non-invasive ABP monitoring and echocardiographic studies of the left ventricle were repeated after 0.5-6.5 years (mean 2.5) in the absence of antihypertensive drug treatment. WCH was defined by an average daytime ABP < 131/86 mmHg in women and < 136/87 mmHg in men. Ambulatory hypertension was defined by higher ABP values. RESULTS: In the whole population, the clinic blood pressure, ABP and left ventricular mass did not change from baseline to the follow-up visit, whereas the peak A: peak E ratio (where A is the velocity of transmitral blood flow after atrial contraction and E is the velocity during passive left ventricle filling) increased from 0.86 to 0.93. Sixty-three per cent of subjects remained in the WCH category at follow-up study; the remaining 37% shifted to the ambulatory hypertension category. The former group showed no changes in clinic blood pressure, ABP, left ventricular mass and peak A: peak E ratio. The clinic blood pressure of those who developed ambulatory hypertension did not change, whereas their ABP and peak A: peak E ratio increased and their left ventricular mass increased slightly but not significantly. The left ventricular mass increased from baseline to follow-up study by 6.2% in those who developed ambulatory hypertension and decreased by 1.6% in those who remained in the WCH category. The changes in left ventricular mass were associated with the changes in average 24 h systolic blood pressure, but not with the changes in clinic blood pressure. In a stepwise logistic regression analysis, average daytime diastolic blood pressure was the sole variable to enter the model and the probability of ambulatory hypertension at follow-up study was 20.0%percnt; in those with basal daytime ABP <130/80 mmHg, versus 81% in those with higher basal daytime blood pressure levels. CONCLUSION: After 0.5-6.5 years, WCH spontaneously evolved into ambulatory hypertension in 37% of subjects, with an accompanying rise in left ventricular mass. The probability of ambulatory hypertension increased with the baseline values of ABP, rather than with those of clinic blood pressure. WCH might be a prehypertensive state (particularly in subjects with higher baseline ABP levels) and should be defined by low levels of daytime ABP, possibly lower than 130/80 mmHg.     

Clinical Implications of White Coat Hypertension

Objective: To determine the clinical implications of mild white coat hypertension (WCH).

Subjects and methods: We studied 102 subjects (54 men, 48 women). 51 of whom were normotensive and 51 slightly hypertensive. None had ever received antihypertensive therapy. An ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) record (Accutracker II), a 24-h electrocardiogram and an echocardiogram were obtained from each, and each was examined by funduscopy. WCH subjects were compared with sustained hypertension (SH) subjects and with normotensives.

Results: Fifty-three percent of the hypertensives qualified as WCH. The ultrasonographic characteristics and the ABP variables of the WCH group differed significantly from those of normotensives, but not from those of the SH group. The prevalence of left ventricilar hypertrophy (LVH) in the SH group (62.5%) did not differ significantly from its prevalence in the WCH group (40.7%). but the prevalence among normotensives (17.6%) was significantly lower than in either of the other two groups. The WCH and SH groups did not differ significantly as regards the prevalence of hypertensive retinopathy (33.3%) in the former, 58.3% in the latter). For no non-LVH, nonretinopathic subject, whether norniotensive or hypertensive, were more than 18% of daytime diastolic ABP measurements ≥90mmHg. Ultrasonographic findings were no better correlated with ABP than with in-clinic BP measurements. Fundus findings correlated well with in-clinic BP and with numerous ABP parameters. Retinopathy, with or without LVH, was efficiently predictable among hypertensives on the basis of body mass index and the 24-h maximum of systolic BP.

Conclusions: Myocardiac remodelling and vascular retinopathy develop early and in parallel in hypertensives, and both developments appear to involve determinants including body mass index and 24-h maximum systolic BP. WCH subjects, as defined by current ABP-based criteria, have cardiac and retinovascular Characteristics different to normotensive subjects. Stricter criteria are needed to discriminate between hypertensives with and without the systemic developments that constitute the immediate source of risk to the hypertensive individual.     

White Coat Hypertension: to Treat or Not to Treat?

Definition of white coat hypertension (WCH) traditionally relies on elevated office blood pressure (BP) during repeated visits concomitant with normal out-of-office BP values, as assessed by home and/or 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring measurements. Accumulating evidence focusing on the association of WCH with target organ damage and, more importantly, with cardiovascular events indicates that the risk conveyed by this condition is intermediate between normotension and sustained hypertension. This article will review a number of issues concerning WCH with particular emphasis on the following: (1) prevalence and clinical correlates, (2) association with target organ damage and cardiovascular events, (3) therapeutic interventions. Data will refer to the original WCH definition, based on out-of-office BP determined by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring; at variance from home BP measurement, this approach rules out the potentially confounding effect of a clinically relevant abnormal BP phenotype such as isolated nocturnal hypertension.     

Investigation of Major Genetic Polymorphisms in the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in Subjects with Young-Onset Hypertension Selected by a Targeted-Screening System at University

Although polymorphisms in renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAA) system genes for angiotensinogen (AGT M235T), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE I/D), angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1 A/C¹¹⁶⁶), and aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2–344T/C) have been major targets for genetic investigation in association with essential hypertension (EH), the influence of these genetic factors is still to be determined. Because patients with young-onset EH are thought to possess a stronger genetic background than EH patients who show elevated BP relatively late in life, the targeted screening of hypertensive students in Tohoku University was completed for the selection of subjects for genetic investigation. Out of 16,434 students (12,794 males and 3,670 females) younger than 30, 22 students showed a high blood pressure (BP) (systolic and diastolic BP of 140 and/or 90 mmHg or greater, respectively, on two occasions and more than 135 and/or 85 mmHg, respectively, at a third measurement during casual BP measurements at the Tohoku University Health Center. These 22 students were asked to measure their BP at home (HBP). Six of the students had a systolic HBP of more than 135 mmHg and/or a diastolic HBP of more than 85 mmHg, and these students subsequently received medical examinations at Tohoku University Hospital and were diagnosed with EH. Genotyping for the four major genetic polymorphisms mentioned above was performed on the six students with EH and on 12 of the remaining 16 students whose HBP was within the normal range (white coat hypertension: WCH). Neither the EH nor the WCH students showed a different distribution of genotypes and allelic frequencies, compared to those found in the general Japanese population. Hence, the present study suggests that none of the major genetic polymorphisms in the RAA system strongly influence the onset of EH.