Alternative medicine use in patients with localized prostate carcinoma treated with curative intent

BACKGROUND: Alternative medicine therapies are estimated to be used by 7-64% of cancer patients but up to 72% do not inform their physician. To the authors' knowledge little useful information is available regarding the prevalence of alternative medicine use by patients with prostate carcinoma. Thus, the authors attempted to evaluate the prevalence of alternative medicine use by prostate carcinoma patients treated with curative intent by either radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy alone, or a combination of brachytherapy and external radiation therapy. METHODS: Between January 1997 and May 1998, 234 men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma underwent radical prostatectomy (54 patients) or brachytherapy (180 patients) with (74 patients) or without (106 patients) external beam radiation therapy. In July 1998 a questionnaire was mailed to all patients comprised of multiple questions regarding alternative medicine use to which 190 patients (81%) responded. The overall prevalence and types of alternative medicine therapies used were assessed and the relation between age at procedure, pretreatment prostate specific antigen level, clinical stage, pretreatment Gleason score, and type of treatment with the use of alternative medicine therapies was evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of alternative medicine use by prostate carcinoma patients responding to the survey was 43% (81 of 190 patients). No significant differences in alternative medicine use were observed between the patients who received brachytherapy alone (38%), those who underwent radical prostatectomy (40%), and those treated with combined brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (51%). Vitamins, prayer or other religious practices, and herbal medicines were the most commonly used therapies in these patients. Higher pretreatment Gleason scores were associated with a greater use of alternative medicine therapies on both multivariate and univariate analyses. Finally, using multivariate analysis, younger prostate carcinoma patients were more likely to use alternative medicine therapies than older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative medicine use is very prevalent among patients treated for localized prostate carcinoma. Because some of these treatments may have a potential biologic impact on tumor behavior and, consequently, on definitive or surrogate therapeutic endpoints, patients should be questioned carefully regarding alternative medicine use during routine tumor follow-up.     

Chinese Medicine in Cancer Treatment – How is it Practised in the East and the West?

Chinese medicine therapies in cancer treatment are very common in the East. Although it is usually classified as a form of complementary and alternative therapy in the West, Chinese medicine is an independent medical profession in Hong Kong and mainland China. It has a different perspective in understanding health and diseases compared with Western medicine. In oncology practice, whereas Western medicine focuses on direct tumour eradication by surgery, radiation therapy and systemic therapies, Chinese medicine focuses on restoring body balance and enhancing the body's defences (immunity), in addition to some cytotoxic herbal therapies. Most often patients, especially those in the East, receive both treatments. Chinese medicine is also commonly used to reduce side-effects from chemotherapy or radiation therapy, to aid recovery after an operation, to palliate symptoms and to address survivorship issues. However, this raises concerns of drug–herb interactions and toxicity in combination therapies. Commonly used Chinese medicine treatment modalities include acupuncture, moxibustion, diet therapy, prescribed Chinese medicine herbal decoction, single Chinese medicine herbs or supplements and tai chi. Although there is an increasing trend of Chinese medicine use in cancer patients in both the East and the West, the scientific evidence of safety and efficacy is often questioned by oncologists. This article reviews the current evidence in different Chinese medicine therapies in cancer management in both the East and the West.     

Complementary and alternative therapies in prostate cancer

Complementary and alternative therapies are used with increasing frequency in men with prostate cancer. However, little is known about the efficacy of such therapies for this cancer. While epidemiological data support the association between intake of certain micronutrients with development of prostate cancer, there exist limited prospective data that support the chemopreventative or therapeutic value of such nutritional agents in prostate cancer. To date, one of the most studied treatments has been PC-SPES, a combination of eight herbal therapies with activity against prostate cancer. Studies in cell lines of human prostate cancer demonstrate significant dose-dependent decreases in cellular viability after exposure to extracts of this agent. Clinical studies suggested that PC-SPES could reduce prostate specific antigen levels in patients with either androgen-dependent or androgen-independent prostate cancer. Toxicity was mild, although there was a low risk of thromboembolic events with such treatment. Manufacture of PC-SPES was recently halted, after revelations that the herbal combination was contaminated with warfarin, which led to a recall by the manufacturer. Subsequent analyses also revealed the presence of diethylstilbestrol (DES) and indomethacin in some lots of PC-SPES. Available data regarding other alternative therapies are reviewed as well.     

The role of PC-SPES, selenium, and vitamin E in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer patients commonly use complementary and alternative medications. There has been growing interest in recent years in the role of the herbal medication PC-SPES and the essential nutrients selenium and vitamin E in the prevention and treatment of prostate cancer. This article reviews the preclinical and clinical studies of these therapies. It is critical that health-care professionals be aware of the potential role and side effects of these widely used complementary and alternative therapies.     

Prevalence in the use of complementary medicine among cancer patients in Tuscany, Italy

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: A previous survey by Molassiotis et al. (Ann Oncol, 16: 655-663, 2005) on the use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) among cancer patients in Europe reported that 73% of the Italian cancer patients had used CAM, a number well above the European average of 36%. Some national variation in preference of CAM was reported, and Italian cancer patients were reported to have high use of homeopathy, herbal medicine, and spiritual therapies. The difference between CAM use in Italy and other European countries intrigued a further investigation of CAM use among Italian cancer patients. METHODS: A survey using the same questionnaire as Molassiotis et al. was conducted at two oncology day hospitals in Tuscany and included 132 patients (55% male, 45% female, with various forms of cancer) on chemotherapy. The response rate was 71%. RESULTS: The incidence of CAM use after cancer diagnosis among Tuscan cancer patients was 17%. The most widely used forms were herbal medicine (52%), homeopathy (30%) and acupuncture (13%). Use was higher in the urban area and among women, breast cancer patients, and persons with a higher education. These results agree with results of other studies on the use of CAM among Italians and Europeans in general, as well as among cancer patients in Italy. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of CAM use among Italians reported by Molassiotis et al. cannot be regarded a national estimate on the use of CAM for cancer in Italy. Rather it may reflect a relatively high use of CAM in palliative care, in Northern Italy and in urban areas. CAM use among Italians in general as well as among Tuscan cancer patients in chemotherapy is modest compared with the overall European use and reflects a general high use of CAM among urbanites, women and those with a higher education. Most commonly used forms of CAM are herbal medicine and homeopathy.     

Assessing websites on complementary and alternative medicine for cancer.

BACKGROUND: Many cancer patients search the World Wide Web for information on complementary and alternative medicine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of such information and identify the treatments most frequently discussed. Materials and methods We used a pre-tested search strategy to identify the websites that are most likely to be used by cancer patients and assessed them according to pre-defined criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-two websites were included in this analysis. The quality of these sites was scored on a point system and varied between 8 and 14 points with a maximum of 14. Most sites issued recommendations for a plethora of treatments, which are typically not supported by sound scientific evidence. Three sites had the potential for harming patients through the advice issued. The most frequently discussed therapies were herbal medicines, diets and mind-body therapies. CONCLUSION: The most popular websites on complementary and alternative medicine for cancer offer information of extremely variable quality. Many endorse unproven therapies and some are outright dangerous.     

Complementary therapies for cancer-related symptoms

Relief of cancer-related symptoms is essential in the supportive and palliative care of cancer patients. Complementary therapies such as acupuncture, mind-body techniques, and massage therapy can help when conventional treatment does not bring satisfactory relief or causes undesirable side effects. Controlled clinical trials show that acupuncture and hypnotherapy can reduce pain and nausea. Meditation, relaxation therapy, music therapy, and massage mitigate anxiety and distress. Pilot studies suggest that complementary therapies may treat xerostomia, hot flashes, and fatigue. Botanicals or dietary supplements are popular but often problematic. Concurrent use of herbal products with mainstream medical treatment should be discouraged.     

Acupuncture: role in comprehensive cancer care--a primer for the oncologist and review of the literature

In recent studies, patients have reported an increased use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Acupuncture is a popular complementary therapy for patients with cancer. This article will provide current cancer treatment providers with information on acupuncture as well as the research conducted on cancer symptoms and side effects of cancer treatments. Antiemetic studies are the most prevalent and contain the most promising results. Several studies have found that acupuncture significantly reduces the number of emesis (vomiting) episodes for patients receiving chemotherapy. While studies on pain control vary due to the heterogeneity of pain, there are few studies investigating pain caused from cancer and the removal of cancerous tumors. These studies, while promising, provide basic results that need further investigation for more definitive results. Although relatively few studies have been done on anxiety and depression, several researchers have found acupuncture to be just as effective as or more effective than antidepressants for patients without cancer. Studies on breathlessness, while small, have shown acupuncture to have a significant positive effect on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, breathlessness associated with end-stage cancer, and asthma. Researchers studying xerostomic individuals who have received salivary gland irradiation found significant positive results in salivary flow rates compared to baseline. Patients with hot flashes due to hormonal imbalance may benefit from the use of acupuncture. A recent pilot study showed improvement of chronic postchemotherapy fatigue following acupuncture treatments. Many individuals with cancer have turned to acupuncture because their symptoms persisted with conventional treatments or as an alternative or complement to their ongoing treatments. Despite the immense popularity in the community, few large randomized trials have been conducted to determine the effects acupuncture has on cancer symptoms and side effects of treatments. A majority of the current studies have shown beneficial effects that warrant further investigation with large trial sizes.     

Complementary and Alternative Medicines in Prostate Cancer: From Bench to Bedside?

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is common among adults, and recent reports suggest that 25%-50% of prostate cancer (PCa) patients use at least one CAM modality. The most common CAM modalities used by PCa patients are vitamin and herbal preparations with purported antitumor effects despite only modest underlying preclinical or clinical evidence of efficacy. In this review we provide a brief overview of the basic scientific and clinical studies underlying the most common herbal and vitamin preparations including common antioxidants, pomegranate extract, green tea, turmeric, resveratrol, silibinin, and herbal combination preparations. When available, prostate cancer clinical trial data are reviewed. Importantly, we have compared the concentration of these agents used in in vitro experiments to that likely to be achievable in humans. From the available data we conclude that there is insufficient evidence to support the use of CAMs for the treatment of prostate cancer patients outside of a clinical trial. The purpose of this review is to more rigorously evaluate CAM therapy in prostate cancer and educate oncologists and patients. This review focuses on examples from the general classes of agents in common use.     

The determinants of traditional Chinese medicine and acupuncture utilization for cancer patients with simultaneous conventional treatment

This paper investigates the determinants of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and acupuncture utilization for cancer patients who are simultaneously having conventional Western medical treatments. This study used five leading cancers in Taiwan, namely cervical, breast, lung, liver and colorectal cancers. A total of 2499 cancer patients were interviewed, of which 2034 had full information and were analysed. Logistic regressions were used for both TCM and acupuncture. The results showed that type of cancer and cancer duration determine the utilization for alternative treatments. While socio-economic factors also affect choice of alternative medicine, the magnitude differs by types of alternative treatment and cancer. Compared with men and older patients, women and younger patients tend to prefer alternative medicine, and patients from south have higher preference for alternative medicine, which could be a reflection of local culture. Our results are useful for the government to determine higher users of TCM and acupuncture among cancer patients, and make policies to suit these patients' needs.     

The supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer (2000)

The diagnosis and subsequent treatment of prostate cancer is followed by a range of significant disease specific and iatrogenic sequelae. However, the supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer are not well described in the literature. The present study assesses the supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer who are members of prostate cancer self-help groups in Queensland, Australia. In all, 206 men aged between 48 and 85 years (mean=68) completed the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS) (62% response). The SCNS is a validated measure assessing perceived need in the domains of psychological needs, health system and information needs, physical and daily living needs, patient care and support, and sexuality. Items assessing need for access to services and resources were also included. One third of the sample reported a moderate to high need for help for multiple items in the sexuality, psychological and health system and information domains. Younger men reported greater need in the sexuality domain; living in major urban centres was predictive of greater psychological need; being closer to the time of diagnosis was related to greater need for help in the physical and daily living domain; having prostate cancer that is not in remission, having received radiation therapy, and lower levels of education were predictive of greater need for help in patient care and support. Of the total sample, 55% of men had used alternative cancer treatments in the past 12 months, with younger and more educated men more likely to use alternative therapies. Interventions in sexuality, psychological concerns and informational support are priorities for men with prostate cancer.     

Complementary and alternative therapies for advanced prostate cancer

This article reviews complementary and alternative therapies for advanced prostate cancer. This is not a comprehensive survey of nontraditional therapies for prostate cancer. Rather, this review focuses on alternative and complementary therapies with published studies to evaluate efficacy and safety. Three areas are addressed: alternative forms of hormonal therapy, management of side effects of hormonal therapy, and management of skeletal complications.     

Complementary and alternative medicine in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer patients, like other cancer patients as well as the general population, are increasingly exploring the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). This paper describes the use of CAM in this patient population and the evidence regarding some CAM treatments in the setting of prostate cancer. Some herbal agents and micronutrients have demonstrated biologic activity that may benefit patients with prostate cancer. The clinical effects of these and others and the potential interactions among CAM treatments and with conventional treatment remain an appropriate target for further investigation.     

Supportive Maßnahmen der Komplementärmedizin

When controlling symptoms in malignant diseases, complementary therapies can make important contributions. This is demonstrated in several important and/or frequent symptoms in cancer patients. Complementary therapies should supplement but not replace established treatments and can be useful, especially where no other established procedures are available. Treatments involve herbal applications as well as acupuncture and so-called mind-body techniques. As information on tumor patients is sometimes insufficient, extrapolation from experiences with other diseases may be helpful, at least as far as side-effects are concerned. Possible drug interactions must be kept in mind especially with herbal treatments.     

A population-based survey of complementary and alternative medicine use in men recently diagnosed with prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To determine prevalence and patterns of use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among men recently diagnosed with prostate cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Men, diagnosed with prostate cancer over a 10-month period in British Columbia, Canada, were randomly selected to obtain a population-based sample. METHODS: Surveys, addressing patient demographics, types of CAM therapies, and CAM information resources utilized, reasons for use, and disclosure to physician(s), were mailed to 1108 men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. A 42% response rate was obtained. RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of patients used CAM therapies with the most common being herbal supplements (saw palmetto), vitamins (vitamin E), and minerals (selenium). The most common reasons given for choosing to use CAM therapies were to (1) boost the immune system and (2) prevent recurrence. The majority of men (58%) had told their physician(s) about their CAM use, but few utilized either their family physician (15%) or their oncologist (7%) as sources of CAM information. CAM users most commonly consulted friends or family (39%) or the Internet (19%) for information about CAM. CAM users were more likely than nonusers to delay (9%) or decline (4%) conventional treatment. Respondents who had never used CAM had typically never thought about it or did not have enough information about the treatments. CONCLUSIONS: More than one third of recently diagnosed prostate cancer patients utilize some form of CAM therapy, and the majority disclose their use to their physician(s). However, they tend to rely on anecdotal information for their CAM decision making. Dissemination of reliable CAM information is one key to helping men navigate this difficult arena.     

Complementary and Alternative Cancer Therapies: Past,Present and the Future Scenario

Use of complementary and alternative therapies is widespread among cancer patients. Throughout the world ‍cancer patients try many questionable or unproven treatment methods. The reasons for adopting these therapies are ‍complex and are related to the social and cultural contexts of their geographical locations. In case of severe illness, ‍the desire to leave no stone unturned is a powerful motivator. In developing countries, ignorance, socioeconomics, ‍and inadequate access to mainstream medical facilities are major factors that play an important role for patients ‍opting for alternative therapies that are replacements for mainstream treatment. Whereas in developed countries a ‍significant proportion of cancer patients try complementary therapies as adjuncts to mainstream care for management ‍of symptoms and to improve quality of life. Many alternative therapies, including pharmacological and biological ‍treatments, remain highly controversial but at the same time are very popular. Evidence from randomized trial ‍supports the value of hypnosis for cancer pain and nausea; relaxation therapy and massage for anxiety; and ‍acupuncture for nausea. This article reviews the different popular alternative cancer therapies practiced in India ‍and neighboring south east Asian countries to project the current international scenario on complementary and ‍alternative cancer therapies.‍ ‍     

Complementary and alternative therapies for cancer

Many cancer patients use therapies promoted as literal alternatives to conventional medical care. Such "alternative" modalities are unproven or were studied and found worthless. These can be harmful. An even greater proportion of cancer patients uses "complementary" therapies along with mainstream cancer treatment. Most are helpful adjunctive approaches that control symptoms and enhance quality of life. This review describes alternative as well as complementary therapies commonly used today by cancer patients. Herbal remedies also are discussed. Evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) is reviewed, and implications for oncologists are discussed. To encourage open communication of CAM use by patients, oncologists should be knowledgeable about the most popular remedies and know where to find reliable information for themselves and for their patients.     

Use of complementary and alternative medicine by Chinese women with breast cancer

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has been rapidly increasing among cancer patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and patterns of CAM use, particularly patients' intentions and their perceived effectiveness of using Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), as well as the relations between the herbal medicine use and demographic and clinical factors among Chinese women with breast cancer. We analyzed the data from a population-based sample of 1065 breast cancer women in urban Shanghai. Patients' average age at diagnosis was 48.1 years and the median time from the initial diagnosis to the follow-up survey was 4.3 years. Overall, 98% of patients had used at least one form of CAM therapy after diagnosis of breast cancer. The most popular CAM modality was traditional Chinese medicine (86.7%), followed by the use of supplements (84.8%), physical exercises (65.5%), and support group attendance (16.6%). CHM was used by 86.4% of patients, while acupuncture was used only by 4.9% of patients. Treating cancer (81.5%) was the most common intentions of using CHM. Other cited intentions included enhancing the immune system (12%), preventing metastasis of cancer or managing other discomforts (7.9%), and lessening menopausal symptoms (4.7%). The majority of patients reported that they had benefited from the use of CHM. Patients who were younger, married, had higher education or income, received chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or had recurrence/metastasis of cancer tended to use CHM more frequently than other patients. The relations between patient characteristics and use of CHMs varied with users' intentions. Given the high prevalence of CAM use among breast cancer patients, research is urgently needed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAM use, particularly use of herbal medicines.     

Complementary and alternative medical therapies for children with cancer

Complementary and alternative medical therapies (CAM) are treatments that generally fall outside of the mainstream of conventional medicine. CAM therapies are used by 31-84% of children with cancer, including many children enrolled on clinical trials. CAM therapies are often used for the treatment of side-effects of cancer or cancer therapy, and only rarely as an alternative to conventional therapy. Regulation of CAM therapies varies worldwide, and many therapies have not been subject to scientifically conducted analyses. Adverse events have been described, especially from the contamination of herbs. Only rare reports of interactions of CAM therapies with conventional anticancer treatments have been reported. Several research studies of CAM in children with cancer are underway. In the interim, non-pharmacological therapies such as mind-body medicine, manipulative and body-based therapies and energy therapies may be used for supportive therapy. Research is needed before biologically based CAM therapies may be recommended in conjunction with conventional therapy.