Response to Chlormethine/Mechlorethamine gel Maintenance Treatment Regimen in Patients With Mycosis Fungoides: A Single-center Retrospective Study

BackgroundMycosis fungoides (MF), the most common subtype of Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, is caused by malignant T-cell proliferations in the skin that can invade blood, lymph nodes, or viscera. Currently, data on efficacy of maintenance therapies in MF are lacking. We developed a unique protocol to use chlormethine/mechlorethamine 0.016% gel formulation as maintenance regimen for MF patients in remission.PurposeTo determine progression-free survival and efficacy of chlormethine/mechlorethamine as maintenance and active treatment regimens for MF.Materials and MethodsA retrospective review of MF patients seen at Thomas Jefferson University from 2012 to 2020 was conducted. Patients of all stages treated with chlormethine/mechlorethamine as maintenance or active treatment with 2 consecutive mSWATs (modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool) documented were included. Treatment outcomes were assessed by change in mSWAT and progression-free survival. Dermatology Life Quality Index surveys before and after treatment were analyzed.ResultsOf 186 MF patients, 44 met inclusion criteria. Patients on maintenance therapy had a 65.22% progression-free survival rate with median time to progression of 29.45 months. By-time analysis for responders on active and maintenance treatment showed an increased response over time. Peak responses were seen at last mSWAT recorded. Both cohorts experienced improved quality-of-life scores from initiation to discontinuation of chlormethine/mechlorethamine.ConclusionPatients on maintenance and active chlormethine/mechlorethamine treatment regimens demonstrated improvement in mSWAT and quality-of-life. Chlormethine/mechlorethamine treatment showed progression-free survival for a median of 29.45 months, indicating this therapy may be an effective maintenance regimen.     

Analysis of Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Lenalidomide Treatment as Part of a Dutch Compassionate Use Program

Background and Methods:To obtain efficacy and safety data on lenalidomide treatment outside of clinical trials, we analyzed the clinical data of 114 patients with refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide on a compassionate use basis. The recommended treatment consisted of lenalidomide 25 mg given on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, in combination with dexamethasone. A median of 3 previous lines of therapy were given, including thalidomide in 91%. Most patients were treated until progression or intolerable toxicity.Results:The median number of cycles was 7 (range, 1-21+ cycles) with a maximum response after a median of 3 cycles (range, 1-10 cycles). The overall response rate was 69%, including complete response in 6%, very good partial response in 19%, and partial response in 44%. The response rate was not influenced by previous thalidomide and/or bortezomib treatment. The median time to progression (TTP) was 9 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 22 months. A significantly longer TTP was observed in patients who previously underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (12.5 months vs. 8 months; P = .036). Overall survival was significantly affected by performance status (P < .0001). Lenalidomide toxicity was predominantly hematologic (37%; Common Toxicity Criteria ≥ 3) and the incidence of venous thrombotic events was low (5%) using the recommended prophylaxis.Conclusion:This analysis confirms that, outside clinical prospective trials, treatment with lenalidomide is highly effective and feasible in heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma.     

Continuous Administration of Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone as a Salvage Treatment for Multiple Myeloma

Purpose:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of continuous low-dose cyclophosphamide and prednisone (CP) as a salvage therapy for multiple myeloma (MM).Patients and Methods:A total of 27 consecutive patients with MM received a treatment regimen that consisted of oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg and prednisone 15 mg daily. Nineteen patients had severe comorbid conditions; 8 were unwilling to continue conventional chemotherapy as a result of severe infection associated with the conventional chemotherapy. Patients had received 1 to 4 chemotherapeutic regimens before the enrollment.Results:The overall response rate (complete remission, very good partial response, and partial response) was 66.7%. The median time to response was 2 months. In the patients who responded to the treatment, the median progression-free survival (PFS) has not been reached. In the nonresponding patients, the median PFS was 4 months.Conclusion:Continuous low-dose CP is an effective and well-tolerated salvage therapy for MM.     

A phase 2, open-label,multicenter study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in adult Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma

Background

TOURMALINE-MM1 was a global study that demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival with ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone compared with placebo plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. The current study was conducted to evaluate further the efficacy and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in Japanese patients.

Methods

This phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study enrolled patients aged ≥ 20 years with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma at 16 sites in Japan. Patients refractory to lenalidomide or proteasome inhibitor-based therapy at any line were excluded. The primary endpoint was the rate of very good partial response or better in the response-evaluable analysis set. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall response rate, duration of response, time to progression, overall survival and safety.

Results

In total, 34 patients were enrolled. The rate of very good partial response or better was 50.0% (95% confidence interval 31.9–68.1) and the overall response rate was 84.4% (95% confidence interval 67.2–94.7). Median progression-free survival was 22.0 months (95% confidence interval 17.3–not evaluable) and median overall survival was not estimable. The safety profile of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in this study was similar to that in the TOURMALINE-MM1 study.

Conclusions

The efficacy and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma are comparable with reported TOURMALINE-MM1 study results.

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier

NCT02917941; date of registration September 28, 2016.

     

Dealing With High-Risk AL Amyloidosis Patients: A Single Hematologic Center Experience

PurposeTo assess the feasibility and the results of Bortezomib-based treatment of “high-risk” AL-amyloidosis patients in a hematology ward.MethodsWe report on 52 high-risk amyloidosis patients treated with first-line bortezomib-based chemotherapy.ResultsAt day 30 from the beginning of the therapy, 23 patients (44%) achieved a hematological response (complete response plus very good partial response); 14 patients (27%) achieved a partial response; 15 patients (29%) were non-responders. After a median follow-up of 28.5 months, the survival rates were 18/23 (78%) for responders; 9/14 (64%) for partial responders and 3/15 (20%) for nonresponders with a median overall survival of 43, 24 and 11 months, respectively (log-rank test: P < .001). NHYA class I-II, NTproBNP < 6500 ng/L, the hematologic response, and the partial hematological response at day 30 independently predicted the survival. There has been no significant difference (P = .173) in survival between revised Mayo stage III and IV patients although there was a trend toward a better prognosis for Mayo stage III. A suboptimal hematological response at day 30 allowed a later organ response in 12/14 patients (85%) even without therapy change and no modification of the hematological status.ConclusionsThese results show that high-risk AL-amyloidosis patients can be managed safely and effectively in a hematology ward. A partial hematologic response may herald a later better response, organ response, and can allow a subsequent second-line therapy and a good survival.     

Feasibility of Long-term Proteasome Inhibition in Multiple Myeloma by in-class Transition From Bortezomib to Ixazomib

BackgroundThe ongoing US MM-6 study is investigating in-class transition (iCT) from parenteral bortezomib-based induction to all-oral IRd (ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone) with the aim of increasing proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based treatment adherence and duration while maintaining patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and improving outcomes.Patients and MethodsUS community sites are enrolling non–transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) with no evidence of progressive disease after 3 cycles of bortezomib-based therapy to receive IRd (up to 39 cycles or until progression or toxicity). The patients use mobile or wearable digital devices to collect actigraphy (activity and sleep) data and electronically complete HRQoL, treatment satisfaction and medication adherence questionnaires. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. The key secondary endpoints include response rates and therapy duration.ResultsAt the data cutoff, 84 patients had been treated (median age 73 years; 44% aged ≥ 75 years; 49% men; 15% Black or African American; and 10% Hispanic or Latino). Of the 84 patients, 62% were continuing therapy. The mean duration of total PI therapy was 10.1 months and for the IRd regimen was 7.3 months. With an 8-month median follow-up, the 12-month progression-free survival rate was 86% (95% confidence interval, 73%-93%) from both the start of bortezomib-based treatment and the start of IRd. The overall response rate was 62% (complete response, 4%; very good partial response, 25%; partial response, 33%) after bortezomib-based induction and 70% (complete response, 26%; very good partial response, 29%; partial response, 15%) after iCT. The IRd safety profile was consistent with previous clinical trial data, and HRQoL and treatment satisfaction were maintained.ConclusionThe patients included in the US MM-6 study are representative of the real-world US MM population. The use of iCT might permit prolonged PI-based therapy with promising efficacy, without impacting patients’ HRQoL or treatment satisfaction.     

An observational, retrospective analysis of retreatment with bortezomib for multiple myeloma

PurposeThe aim of this retrospective chart review of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) was to describe patterns of retreatment with bortezomib-based therapy and responses to retreatment in a community-based setting.Patients and MethodsData were retrospectively extracted from the medical records of patients treated in US Oncology—affiliated community oncology clinics who received 2 separate treatments with bortezomib-based therapy. Eligible patients had ≥ 60 days between treatments and ≥ 4 bortezomib doses during initial treatment. Responses were determined primarily by laboratory values. Response categories included (1) very good partial response (VGPR), ≥ 90% M-protein decrease; (2) partial response (PR), 50%–89% decrease; and (3) less than PR (< PR), < 50% decrease, excluding progressive disease (PD).ResultsRetreatment response data were available for 82 patients; 5 (6%) had VGPR, 12 (15%) had PR, 52 (63%) had < PR, 5 (6%) had PD, and 8 (10%) died. Among 62 patients with response assessments for initial treatment and retreatment, VGPR/PR rates to retreatment were 44%, 23%, and 13% among patients with VGPR, PR, and < PR to initial treatment, respectively. Median time between bortezomib treatments was 9.7 months; 29% of patients received non-bortezomib therapy between treatments. The most common treatment pattern (58% of patients) was single-agent bortezomib at initial treatment and retreatment. Toxicity contributed to discontinuation in 38% of patients during initial treatment and 22% during retreatment; rates of neuropathy contributing to discontinuation were 18% and 6%, respectively.ConclusionRetreatment with bortezomib-based therapy is feasible, with predictable toxicities. This observational analysis supports bortezomib alone or in combination as a retreatment option after initial bortezomib treatment in patients with relapsed MM.     

Percutaneous Electrochemotherapy in Primary and Secondary Liver Malignancies – Local Tumor Control and Impact on Overall Survival

BackgroundLocal nonsurgical tumor ablation currently represents a further option for the treatment of patients with liver tumors or metastases. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a welcome addition to the portfolio of local therapies. A retrospective analysis of patients with liver tumors or metastases treated with ECT is reported. Attention is given to the safety and efficacy of the treatment over time.Patients and methodsEighteen consecutive patients were recruited with measurable liver tumors of different histopatologic origins, mainly colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and hepatocellular cancer. They were treated with percutaneous ECT following the standard operating procedures (SOP) for ECT under general anaesthesia and muscle relaxation. Treatment planning was performed based on MRI preoperative images. The follow-up assessment included contrast-enhanced MR within at least 1–3 months after treatment and then after 5, 7, 9, 12, and 18 months until progression of the disease or death.ResultsOnly mild or moderate side effects were observed after ECT. The objective response rate was 85.7% (complete response 61.9%, partial 23.8%), the mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.0 ± 8.2 months, and the overall survival (OS) was 11.3 ± 8.6 months. ECT performed best (PFS and OS) in lesions within 3 and 6 cm diameters (p = 0.0242, p = 0.0297)_. The effectiveness of ECT was independent of the localization of the lesions: distant, close or adjacent to vital structures. Progression-free survival and overall survival were independent of the primary histology considered.ConclusionsElectrochemotherapy provides an effective valuable option for the treatment of unresectable liver metastases not amenable to other ablative techniques.Key words: electrochemotherapy, liver metastases     

Familial Disease Predisposition Impacts Treatment Outcome in Patients With Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

BackgroundWe examined the impact of familial predisposition on treatment outcome in 135 patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), 26.7% of whom had first- or second-degree relatives with a B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder.Patients and MethodsAll patients were rituximab naive and received a rituximab-containing regimen. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between cohorts.ResultsOverall response (93.9% vs. 75.0%; P = .029) and complete response/very good partial response (CR/VGPR) (23.2% vs. 16.7%; P < .0001), time to progression (TTP) (45.5 vs. 21 months; P = .015) and time to next therapy (TTNT) (50.0 vs. 33.0 months; P = .024) favored patients with sporadic WM. By multivariate analysis, familial predisposition was an independent marker for disease progression (hazard ratio, 0.554). Patients with familial but not sporadic disease exhibited better responses, including CR/VGPR attainment (P = .0006) and a trend for longer progression-free survival (> 33 vs. 20.6 months; P = .08), with bortezomib-containing therapy.ConclusionThe findings convey that familial predisposition is an important determinant of treatment outcome in WM. Prospective studies to confirm these observations are needed.     

Multicenter photopheresis intervention trial in early-stage mycosis fungoides

PurposeTo demonstrate the efficacy of the UVAR XTS Photopheresis System and evaluate health-related quality of life in patients with early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF).Patients and MethodsExtracorporeal photopheresis was administered 2 days every 4 weeks for 6 months. Patients with partial responses by skin weighted assessment continued for 6 months; nonresponders added oral bexarotene and/or interferon α. Health-related quality of life was assessed at baseline and every 3 months with 3 validated tools.ResultsNineteen patients with early-stage MF (7 men, 12 women; 16 white, 3 African Americans) with median age of 63.5 years (range, 46-85 years) participated. Their stages were IA (n = 3), IB (n = 14), and IIA (n = 2). The overall response rate for extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) alone, was 42% (8/19; including 7 partial response, 1 complete response), with a median of 12 ECP sessions (range, 3-32) given over a median of 12 months (3-32 months) and with an overall duration of response of 6.5 months (range, 1-48 months). Seven patients with stable disease at 3 months received additional bexarotene (3/5; 1 complete response) or bexarotene plus interferon α (1/2), and 4 (57%) of 7 responded. Treatment-related adverse effects were limited to those expected with interferon (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea), or with hypertriglyceridemia and bexarotene. Trends in health-related quality of life indicated an improvement in emotional scores over time.ConclusionsECP is effective for patients with early-stage MF alone or in combination with biologic response modifiers with low toxicity and improved quality of life.     

Analysis of the Efficacy of Thalidomide Plus Dexamethasone-Based Regimens in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Received Prior Chemotherapy,Including Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: KMM-166 Study

BackgroundFor patients with multiple myeloma (MM) that relapsed after treatment with bortezomib- and lenalidomide-based regimens, there were no other treatment options in Korea until 2016. We aimed to determine the efficacy of thalidomide plus dexamethasone-based regimens in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM).Patients and MethodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis in Korea for patients with RRMM treated with thalidomide-based regimens who previously received bortezomib and immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), including thalidomide and lenalidomide.ResultsIn 47 patients with RRMM, the median age was 64 years and the median number of previous treatment lines, including bortezomib and IMiDs, was 3. Primary resistance to bortezomib and lenalidomide was observed in 12 (26%) and 8 (17%) patients, respectively. The most common regimen was a combination of thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone. The overall response rate was 38%; 2 patients (4%) experienced a complete response, and 2 patients (4%) experienced a very good partial response. The overall response rate of patients previously exposed to thalidomide was 53%. The median progression-free survival was 5.9 months, and overall survival was 9.2 months. Patients with disease that responded to the thalidomide-based regimen had better progression-free survival compared to those who did not (median, 8.8 vs. 2.5 months; P = .008). The most common adverse events were anemia (51%) for hematologic toxicities and peripheral neuropathy (30%) for nonhematologic toxicities.ConclusionThalidomide-based regimens are potential salvage treatment options for patients with RRMM, even those with disease with prior resistance to IMiDs.     

Comparison of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours and Choi criteria for response evaluation in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma treated with trabectedin: A retrospective analysis

BackgroundTo assess the additional value of density measurement using contrast-enhancement sequences (Choi assessment) in a real-life cohort of adult soft tissue sarcoma patients treated with trabectedin.MethodsEligibility criteria included adults (age ⩾18) treated between 01/2007 and 12/2011, with at least two trabectedin cycles after failure or intolerance to doxorubicin/ifosfamide. Baseline and first computed tomography (CT)-scans were centrally reviewed by an experienced radiologist.ResultsThe retrospective cohort consists of 134 (73 female) patients treated with trabectedin 1.5 mg/m² given as a 24-h infusion every 3 weeks. Patients received a median of five trabectedin cycles (range: 2–33) and the main cause of discontinuation was progressive disease (PD) (n = 105, 78.4%). Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) assessment was feasible in 128 (95.5%) patients, with Choi assessment performed in 92 (68.7%) patients, generally due to inadequate sequences or exclusive lung metastases. Concordance between both methods was fair (Kappa = 0.290). We identified five patients with false PD (i.e. PD according to RECIST but stable disease/partial response as per Choi). Univariate analysis did not identify any predictive factors for false PD. Median overall survival (OS) of patients with PD as per RECIST but stable disease/partial response (SD/PR) according to Choi was better than for patients with PD according to both RECIST and Choi (14 months versus 8 months; p = 0.052).ConclusionsChoi assessment may identify patients with false PD who achieved improved efficacy outcomes, suggesting that trabectedin may delay tumour progression even in the case of non-dimensional response. Dual size and tumour density assessment may be more suitable to evaluate responses to trabectedin in sarcoma patients as well as to improve the decision-making strategies for the continuation of trabectedin therapy.     

Cyclophosphamide,Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (CyBorD) for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed AL Amyloidosis: Impact of Response on Survival Outcomes

BackgroundCyBorD (cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone) is an effective regimen for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis. CyBorD can induce rapid hematologic responses (HRs). However, it remains inadequate to enhance outcomes in high-risk groups. In addition, minimal information is available on the impact of minimal residual disease (MRD) in overall survival.Patients and MethodsAll consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis treated with CyBorD from January 2012 to August 2018 were evaluated. HR and organ response was assessed as per standard guidelines. Further, MRD was evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry in patients with confirmed complete response (CR).ResultsAfter a median of 4 cycles, HR was seen in 31 (91.2%) cases, including CR in 9 (26.5%), very good partial response in 9 (26.5%), and partial response in 13 patients (38.2%). Organ response at 6 months was documented in 11 (32.4%) cases. With respect to cardiac response, a > 30% decrease of NT-proBNP was observed in 4 (19%) of 21 evaluable cases (NTproBNP > 650 ng/L) at a median of 6 months. The median progression-free survival was 26.7 months. Patients who achieved CR exhibited a better overall survival compared with those without CR (P = .001). No difference on overall or progression-free survival among cases achieving CR irrespective of their MRD status was observed (P > .05).ConclusionsIn summary, CyBorD showed a ≥ very good partial response rate of 53% with 26.5% achieving CR, which is similar to that seen in previous studies. In addition, MRD negativity assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry in patients with CR resulted in no difference on survival outcomes.     

Docetaxel is effective in heavily pretreated patients with disseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BackgroundTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent docetaxel (Taxotere) as therapy in patients with disseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Patients and methodsPatients with histologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent NPC who have failed at least one line of palliative chemotherapy regimen but no prior docetaxel were eligible. Patients received weekly docetaxel every 28 days (docetaxel 30 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15) and were evaluated every two cycles of treatment of response assessment. Quality-of-life (QoL) assessments during the treatment period were done using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL questionnaire QLQ-C30; version 3.0.ResultsThirty patients were assessable for toxicity and response. The median age of the patients was 47 years (range 25–68 years) and the majority of patients had good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0–1). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity included fatigue (13%), anemia (10%) and diarrhea (3%) of patients. Eleven (37%) and four (13.3%) patients achieved partial response and stable disease, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 5.3 months and median overall survival of 12.8 months. The partial responders had a mean duration of response of 4.1 months. Docetaxel caused a significant decline in QoL scores during treatment of patients responding or progressing with the treatment.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that weekly docetaxel is well tolerated and is an active agent in patients with disseminated NPC who were previously exposed and largely refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy but can cause a significant decline in QoL during treatment.     

Bortezomib,Vorinostat, and Dexamethasone Combination Therapy in Relapsed Myeloma: Results of the Phase 2 MUK four Trial

IntroductionOutcomes continue to improve in relapsed myeloma as more effective treatment options emerge. We report a multicenter single-arm phase 2 trial evaluating toxicity and efficacy of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor vorinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone.Patients and MethodsSixteen patients who had received a median of 1 prior treatment line received bortezomib subcutaneously 1.3 mg/m² days 1, 4, 8, and 11; dexamethasone 20 mg orally days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, and 11-12; vorinostat 400 mg orally days 1-4, 8-11, and 15-18 of a 21-day cycle. After receipt of a minimum of 3 cycles of therapy, participants received maintenance vorinostat (400 mg days 1-4 and 15-18 of a 28-day cycle).ResultsOverall response was 81.3%: complete response occurred in 4 of 16, very good partial response in 2 of 16, and partial response 7 of 16. Clinical benefit response rate was 100%; median progression-free survival was 11.9 months. A total of 75% patients experienced a dose reduction or stopped treatment as a result of intolerability.ConclusionAlthough toxicity and dose reductions were observed, this study demonstrates that the combination of vorinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone is effective in relapsed myeloma with good response rates, suggesting there is an ongoing rationale for further optimization of HDAC inhibitor–based combinations in the treatment of myeloma to improve tolerability and enhance efficacy.     

Low-Dose Hypofractionated Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy for Adult Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

PurposeHistorically, the standard of care for total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) delivered 30 to 36 Gy over 5 to 10 weeks. Given the high risk of relapse, a majority of patients require additional treatments. Therefore, attempts to use a shortened course of TSEBT have been investigated.Methods and MaterialsWe conducted a single-institution retrospective review to evaluate disease response, control, and toxicity using a low-dose, hypofractionated course of TSEBT (HTSEBT) in patients with mycosis fungoides.ResultsForty patients received 57 courses of HTSEBT. Median dose (Gy)/fractionation was 12/3, spanning a median time of 2.4 weeks. Overall response rate of patients assessed (n = 54) was 100%. Thirty-one courses (57.4%) resulted in a complete response and 23 courses (42.6%) resulted in a partial response. Cumulative incidence of progressive skin disease at 3 months was 37.2%, at 6 months, 56.9%, and at 1 year, 81.5%. Of the 40 patients treated with a first course of HTSEBT, 31 received subsequent courses of radiotherapy. Cumulative incidence of subsequent treatment was 28.0% at 3 months, 46.8% at 6 months, and 70.0% at 1 year. Patients who underwent repeat courses of HTSEBT continued to have similar treatment responses to repeat courses without increased toxicities. Toxicities from all courses were acceptable with the exception of 1 patient, who experienced grade 4 skin toxicity (moist desquamation requiring hospitalization).ConclusionsLow-dose HTSEBT provides good palliation in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with a satisfactory response and toxicity profile. HTSEBT allows therapy to be completed in far fewer treatments. Low-dose HTSEBT is an appropriate treatment option for patients unable to come for daily treatment. HTSEBT provides a way to decrease exposure to other patients and staff during public health emergencies such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.     

Induction Treatment With Cyclophosphamide,Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Phase II Study

Background:Thalidomide has alternative mechanisms of action; it can be combined with dexamethasone or alkylating agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM); however, the optimal doses and appropriate intervals of thalidomide continue to be debated.Patients and Methods:We assessed the clinical efficacy and toxicity of thalidomide in patients with newly diagnosed MM; 68 patients were treated with pulsed cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) chemotherapy for induction treatment.Results:After a median of 28 months' follow-up, the overall response rate was 79.4%, with a 42.6% complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR). Patients with cytogenetically high-risk disease had poor CR/VGPR rates (27.3%) at a median of 11.5 months of time to progression (TTP) compared with patients with standard-risk disease who achieved CR/VGPR rates (50%) at a median of 20.3 months of TTP. The major adverse events included peripheral sensory neuropathy (14.3%), infection (10.2%), and thromboembolic complications (5.9%). Thirty-two patients who achieved more than a PR proceeded to peripheral blood stem cell collection with a median number of 5.0 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg collected.Conclusion:CTD resulted in a favorable response with tolerable toxicity in patients with MM and did not affect the yield of the stem cell collection.     

Patient characteristics,treatment patterns,and outcomes among black and white patients with multiple myeloma initiating daratumumab: A real-world chart review study

BackgroundDaratumumab was approved for multiple myeloma (MM) in 2015. While its safety and efficacy are well documented, there is limited real-world information on its use and outcomes in patients of different races.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients with MM initiating daratumumab in any line of therapy (LOT) between November 2015 and May 2020. De-identified data were retrieved from 2 US clinical sites; patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and response rate were described for black and white patients, stratified by LOT. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to next LOT (TTNT) were compared between black and white patients initiating daratumumab in second line (2L) or later, adjusting for age and number of prior lines.ResultsTwo hundred and fifty-two patient charts (89 black, 163 white) were extracted. Black patients were younger at diagnosis (61.7 vs. 67.0 years) and had a similar proportion of females (black: 44.9%, white: 46.6%). Black patients had longer time between MM diagnosis and daratumumab initiation (43.2 vs. 34.1 months) and received more prior LOTs (median 3.0 vs. 2.0). ORR for black and white patients initiating daratumumab in 1L was 100.0%, with very good partial response or better in 75.0% and 66.7%, respectively. Similar trends were observed in 2L and 3L+. There were no significant differences in ORR, PFS, or TTNT between groups.ConclusionDaratumumab had similar clinical outcomes (ORR, PFS, and TTNT) in black and white patients. Black patients initiated daratumumab later in their treatment, suggesting potential discrepancies in access to new MM treatments.     

Feasibility study of a Response Surveillance Program in locally advanced mid and low rectal cancer to increase organ preservation

BackgroundAssessment of tumor response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment by MRI (Tumour Regression Grade, TRG 1–5) is well standardized. The overall timing and method of defining complete response (cCR) remain controversial. The aim of this work was to evaluate the feasibility of a defined Response Surveillance Program (RSP) to increase organ preservation for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment.MethodsA standardized program of clinical (CR), radiological (RR) and metabolic (MR) assessment of tumor response is defined over a 6 month period from completion of NACRT with formal assessment performed every 2 months (M). Patients with TRG1-3 at M2 and TRG1-2 at M4 continue in the program up to M6 assessment. Patients managed with this protocol from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was rectal preservation rate. Secondary endpoints included disease-free survival and overall survival at 3 years.Result314 potentially suitable patients were enrolled in the RSP and 50 patients completed the six month program and were successfully enrolled into watch and wait. Fourteen (28%) were T2 tumor stage, 27 (54%) T3 and nine (18%) were T4. During watch and wait, patients with locoregional recurrence (n = 11) were treated with local excision (n = 3), endocavitary radiotherapy (n = 1), TME (n = 5) and APR (n = 2). With a median follow-up of 32 months, the rectal preservation rate was 88%, with a 3-year disease-free survival of 67% and an overall survival of 98%.ConclusionThis study validates the feasibility of the practical implementation of a Response Surveillance Program to increase organ preservation rates without compromising oncological outcomes in rectal cancer.     

Adding cetuximab to capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research SAKK

BackgroundTo determine the activity and tolerability of adding cetuximab to the oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) combination in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC).Patients and methodsIn a multicenter two-arm phase II trial, patients were randomized to receive oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14 every 3 weeks alone or in combination with standard dose cetuximab. Treatment was limited to a maximum of six cycles.ResultsSeventy-four patients with good performance status entered the trial. Objective partial response rates after external review and radiological confirmation were 14% and 41% in the XELOX and in the XELOX + Cetuximab arm, respectively. Stable disease has been observed in 62% and 35% of the patients, with 76% disease control in both arms. Cetuximab led to skin rash in 65% of the patients. The median overall survival was 16.5 months for arm A and 20.5 months for arm B. The median time to progression was 5.8 months for arm A and 7.2 months for arm B.ConclusionDifferences in response rates between the treatment arms indicate that cetuximab may improve outcome with XELOX. The correct place of the cetuximab, oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine combinations in first-line treatment of MCC has to be assessed in phase III trials.