Consolidative Radiotherapy After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Introduction

We evaluated the role of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Ibrutinib Monotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory,Transformed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

BackgroundHistologic transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (tDLBCL) occurs in a significant proportion of indolent lymphomas. However, few studies of novel agents inform its management, particularly when relapsed after or refractory (R/R) to prior treatment.Patients and MethodsWe prospectively evaluated ibrutinib monotherapy in pathologically documented patients with R/R tDLBCL in a single-arm study. The primary endpoint was overall response rate.ResultsTwenty patients who had received a median of 4 (range, 2-9) prior lines of therapy overall (median, 2.5; range, 1-9 for tDLBCL) were treated. The overall response rate was 35%, including complete responses in 15%. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.1 months (95% confidence interval, 2.4-6.2 months) and 22.4 months (95% confidence interval, 7.5 months to not reached), respectively. Disease control > 2 months was seen in 75% and > 1 year in 15%. Response was associated with either low tumor bulk or low metabolic tumor volume (P = .05) but not with antecedent lymphoma histology (P = 1.0). Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with prior studies of ibrutinib.ConclusionsIbrutinib showed low toxicity and meaningful efficacy in R/R tDLBCL, including short-term disease control in most cases. Results demonstrate the potential utility of ibrutinib in this challenging clinical setting, including as a potential bridge to more definitive treatments.     

Phase 2 Study of Daratumumab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle-Cell Lymphoma,Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma,and Follicular Lymphoma

BackgroundDaratumumab is a CD38 monoclonal antibody approved for treating relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Preclinical daratumumab studies demonstrated cytotoxic activity and reduced tumor growth in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL).Patients and MethodsThis was a phase 2, open-label, multicenter, 2-stage trial. Patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, FL, or MCL with ≥ 50% CD38 expression were eligible for stage 1. Daratumumab (16 mg/kg; 28-day cycles) was administered intravenously weekly for 2 cycles, every 2 weeks for 4 cycles, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Overall response rate was the primary end point. Pharmacokinetic and safety were also evaluated. Stage 2 was planned to further assess daratumumab in larger populations of NHL subtypes if futility criteria were not met. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02413489).ResultsThe trial screened 138 patients resulting in accrual of 15 patients with DLBCL, 16 with FL, and 5 with MCL. Median CD38 expression across treated patients was 70%. Overall response rate was 6.7%, 12.5%, and not evaluable in DLBCL, FL, and MCL cohorts, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event was thrombocytopenia (11.1%), and 4 (11.1%) patients discontinued treatment because of treatment-emergent adverse events. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 72.2% of patients (3 patients with grade 3; no grade 4).ConclusionIn NHL, the safety and pharmacokinetics of daratumumab were consistent with myeloma studies. Screen-fail rates were high, prespecified futility thresholds were met in 2 cohorts, and the study was terminated. Studies in other hematologic malignancies and amyloidosis are ongoing.     

Clinical Efficacy and Safety in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Literature Review

This systematic literature review was designed to assess information on the clinical efficacy and safety of interventions used in the treatment of refractory or relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) and to perform a meta-analysis if possible. We searched databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for articles from 1997 to August 2, 2012 reported in English), conference abstracts, bibliographic reference lists, and the ClinicalTrials.gov database for phase II to IV studies with results. Studies had to report on patients with R/R DLBCL who were not eligible to receive high-dose therapy (HDT) with stem cell transplantation (SCT) (autologous or allogeneic). Mixed-type non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) studies were required to report R/R DLBCL outcomes separately. We identified 55 studies that presented outcomes data separately for patients with R/R DLBCL. Of 7 comparative studies, only 4 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In the 2 RCTs with a common regimen, the patient populations differed too greatly to perform a valid meta-analysis. The 48 single-arm studies identified were typically small (n < 50 in most), with 31% reporting median progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) specifically for the R/R DLBCL population. In these studies, median OS ranged from 4 to 13 months. The small number of RCTs in R/R DLBCL precludes identifying optimal treatments. Small sample size, infrequent reporting of OS and PFS separated by histologic type, and limited information on patient characteristics also hinder comparison of results. Randomized studies are needed to demonstrate which current therapies have advantages for improving survival and other important clinical outcomes in patients with R/R DLBCL.     

BCL2 Expression in First-Line Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Identifies a Patient Population With Poor Prognosis

IntroductionThe prognostic value of B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) expression in de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with immunochemotherapy is of interest to define a target patient population for clinical development of BCL2 inhibitors. We aimed to develop a reproducible immunohistochemistry algorithm and assay to determine BCL2 protein expression and assess the prognostic value of BCL2 in newly diagnosed DLBCL cohorts.Patients and MethodsThe prospectively defined algorithm incorporated BCL2 staining intensity and percentage of BCL2-positive cells. Functionally relevant cutoffs were based on the sensitivity of lymphoma cell lines to venetoclax. This assay was highly reproducible across laboratories. The prognostic impact of BCL2 expression was assessed in DLBCL patients from the phase 3 MAIN (n = 230) and GOYA (n = 366) trials, and a population-based registry (n = 310).ResultsApproximately 50% of tumors were BCL2 positive, with a higher frequency in high International Prognostic Index (IPI) and activated B-cell–like DLBCL subgroups. BCL2 expression was associated with poorer progression-free survival in the MAIN study (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-3.40; multivariate Cox regression adjusted for IPI and cell of origin). This trend was confirmed in the GOYA and registry cohorts in adjusted multivariate analyses (GOYA: HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.05-2.82; registry: HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.29-2.78). Patients with BCL2 immunohistochemistry-positive and IPI-high disease had the poorest prognosis: 3-year progression-free survival rates were 51% (GOYA) and 37% (registry).ConclusionFindings support use of our BCL2 immunohistochemistry scoring system and assay to select patients with BCL2-positive tumors for future studies.     

Thiotepa,Etoposide, Cyclophosphamide,Cytarabine, and Melphalan (TECAM) Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Lymphoma

Background

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the current standard of care for relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Conditioning regimens with high-dose carmustine have been associated with idiopathic pneumonitis syndrome. We, therefore, created a modified alternative TECAM conditioning regimen, consisting of etoposide, thiotepa, cytarabine, cyclophosphamide, and melphalan.

Late Relapses After High-dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in the Rituximab Era

BackgroundThe standard of care for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapsing after front-line therapy is high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Evidence has suggested that early relapses (ie, within 1 year) after this approach portends exceptionally poor outcomes. However, data examining relapses > 1 year after ASCT for patients with refractory or relapsed DLBCL are limited, in particular, in the rituximab era. We sought to examine the effect of early (≤ 1 year) and late (> 1 year) relapse after ASCT in a single-institution cohort of patients with relapsed and refractory DLBCL treated with chemoimmunotherapy.Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the data from 85 consecutive patients who had undergone ASCT for biopsy-confirmed relapsed or refractory DLBCL from 2001 to 2010 at the University of Rochester Medical Center. All patients had received rituximab as a part of treatment. Of the 85 patients, 35 developed relapse after ASCT. These 35 patients were divided into 2 groups according to the timing of the relapse (≤ 1 year and > 1 year after ASCT).ResultsThe median follow-up period was 6.4 years. For all patients, the overall survival (OS) from post-ASCT relapse was 5.2 years. For the 27 patients developing relapse at ≤ 1 year after ASCT, the median OS was 0.6 year and progression-free survival was 0.4 year. For the 8 patients developing relapse at > 1 year after ASCT, the median OS was 5.9 years and progression-free survival was 2.9 years.ConclusionPatients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL experiencing relapse > 1 year after ASCT had good outcomes. Despite the relative rarity in incidence, a significant risk of relapse of DLBCL after ASCT remains, suggesting the need for continued monitoring because of the possibility of later progression.     

Impact of Cell of Origin on Outcomes After Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B cell lymphoma (GCB-DLBCL) at diagnosis is associated with superior long-term outcomes compared to non-GCB-DLBCL in patients treated with conventional chemo-immunotherapy. Whether cell of origin (COO) by Hans algorithm retains its prognostic significance in patients with (R/R) relapsed/refractory DLBCL undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (auto-HCT) is not well established. Three hundred and fifty-seven patients underwent auto-HCT between 2005 and 2018. The COO status was determined in 284 patients and these were included in the analysis. One hundred ninety-four patients had GCB-DLBCL while 90 had non-GCB-DLBCL. Median follow up was 1.7 (0-13) years. The GCB-DLBCL was associated with inferior 5-year overall survival at 44% (95%CI, 36-52) versus 64% (95%CI, 54-77) (P = .004) and a higher relapse incidence at 67% (95%CI, 58-74) versus 49% (95%CI, 35-60) (P = .01) in the non-GCB-DLBCL. The difference between GCB and non-GCB-DLBCL remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis. Additionally, response at the time of transplant was an independent prognostic factor. GCB-DLBCL was enriched in double-hit and triple hit phenotype based on available fluorescence in situ hybridization data. These results suggest an enrichment of high-risk genetic rearrangements in R/R GCB-DLBCL resulting in limited efficacy of auto-HCT.     

Phase II Study of Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection (Marqibo) and Rituximab for Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma or Mantle Cell Lymphoma in Need of Palliative Therapy

BackgroundVSLI (Marqibo) is active in advanced non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and untreated aggressive NHL. Because of its favorable hematologic toxicity profile, VSLI might be useful in patients unable to tolerate myelosuppressive therapies.Patients and MethodsTwenty-two patients with heavily pretreated, advanced CD20⁺ DLBCL or MCL were treated with VSLI 2.0 mg/m², without a dose cap, every 2 weeks plus 4 weekly doses of rituximab 375 mg/m². ORR, complete response (CR), or partial response (PR), was the primary end point. Secondary end points included response duration, time to progression (TTP), and OS. Safety variables included adverse events and neurologic assessments.ResultsThe ORR was 13 of 22 (59%); 6 patients achieved a CR (27%), and 7 patients achieved a PR (32%). Median response duration, TTP, and OS were 147 days, 121 days, and 322 days, respectively. The median number of VSLI doses was 5, the median individual VSLI dose was 3.5 mg, and the maximum cumulative VSLI dose was 43 mg. Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy, febrile neutropenia, and constipation were reported in 4, 2, and 1 patients, respectively.ConclusionVSLI plus rituximab resulted in durable responses in patients with heavily pretreated advanced stage DLBCL and MCL. The toxicity profile was predictable and manageable with limited hematologic toxicity. Despite near-universal previous VCR exposure (96%) and doses of VSLI unachievable with standard VCR treatment, peripheral neuropathy and constipation were modest. This study supports further evaluation of VSLI as a component of DLBCL management.     

造血干细胞支持下大剂量LACE方案对27例难治复发性淋巴瘤疗效观察

目的:评价在造血干细胞支持下,LACE预处理方案对难治性、复发性淋巴瘤临床疗效.方法:自2001年3月至2003年7月对27例难治性、复发性淋巴瘤在造血干细胞支持下,应用LACE预处理方案:罗氮芥(L)200mg/m2,1次口服(移植前第7天),足叶乙甙(E)1g/m2,静脉点滴(移植前第7天),阿糖胞苷(A)2g/m2×d-1,静脉点滴(移植前第6、5天),环磷酰胺(C)1.8/m2×d-1,静脉点滴(移植前第4、3、2天),0天进行自体干细胞输注并进行随访观察.结果:27例患者均可耐受化疗,无移植相关死亡病例,并对移植后的患者进行随访观察,随访中位期14个月(7～35),6例复发,21例缓解.统计分析2年无瘤生存率可达70%,预计5年生存率可达55%.结论:对难治性复发性淋巴瘤,在造血干细胞支持下,LACE方案是较好的一种预处理方案.     

Gemcitabine,Cisplatin, and Dexamethasone as a Salvage and Mobilization Chemotherapy Before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation is Effective and Safe Outpatient Regimen in Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients

BackgroundSecond line salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the current standard treatment for eligible patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Several salvage regimens have been used before ASCT. However the optimal salvage regimen is still unclear. We report outcome of patients with R/R HL treated with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and dexamethasone (GDP) regimen before ASCT in this retrospective study aiming at evaluating efficacy, stem cell mobilization activity and safety of GDP in a real-life setting.Patients and MethodsForty-five patients with R/R HL who were treated with GDP as salvage and mobilization regimen before ASCT were analyzed retrospectively. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were collected after GDP. All patients underwent ASCT after 2 cycles of GDP.ResultsThirty-six (80%) patients achieved overall response including 24 (53.3%) complete response (CR). PBSC collections were adequate in all patients with a median number of 11.01 × 10⁶/kg CD34+ cells. The most common grade 3/4 hematological adverse events were thrombocytopenia (31.1%) and neutropenia (22.2%). There were no febrile neutropenic episodes. Grade 3 or 4 renal, hepatic, or cardiac toxicity was not observed. The 4 year progression-free survival and overall survival for patients receiving GDP followed by ASCT were 72% and 92%, respectively.ConclusionOur results suggest that GDP is a viable therapeutic option before ASCT with high response rate, favorable toxicity profile and excellent mobilization potential. Applicability of GDP on an outpatient setting also provides advantage over other effective salvage regimens.     

Upfront Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Untreated High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Patients Up to 60 Years of Age

BackgroundAlthough rituximab added to CHOP (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) is the standard chemotherapy for untreated DLBCL, its therapeutic effect is limited in younger patients with high-intermediate risk or high-risk disease according to the age-adjusted international prognostic index. In fact, the efficacy and safety of HDT plus rituximab followed by ASCT for such patients remain unclear.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively investigated the safety and effectiveness of HDT/ASCT in patients with untreated DLBCL. Twenty-two patients, aged 60 years and younger, with untreated DLBCL (classified as high-intermediate [n = 14 (64%)] or high [n = 8 (32%)] risk) underwent upfront HDT/ASCT between January 2004 and December 2008, achieving either a complete response (CR; n = 15 (68%)) or a partial response (PR; n = 7 (32%)).ResultsThe 5-year overall survival rate was 81.0% and the progression-free survival rate was 73.0%, with no significant difference between risk groups based on the international prognostic index. The most common nonhematologic toxicity was febrile neutropenia [n = 9 (41%)]. The cause of all 3 fatalities was exacerbation of the underlying disease, and no treatment-related mortality was observed. No variables with a significant influence on overall survival were identified, but a correlation of the treatment response before transplanation with progression-free survival was suggested (CR vs. PR: 92% vs. 30%, P = .002).ConclusionThese results suggest that adding rituximab to upfront HDT/ASCT is feasible and can improve the outcome in untreated patients with poor-prognosis DLBCL. In the future, upfront HDT/ASCT should be more extensively evaluated in clinical trials.     

Safety and Efficacy of a DNA Oligonucleotide Therapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

BackgroundPNT2258 is a liposomal formulation that encapsulates multiple copies of PNT100, a native, chemically unmodified, 24-base DNA oligonucleotide designed to target the regulatory region upstream of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) gene.MethodsThis phase II, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, 2-stage design study investigated the single-agent activity of PNT2258 in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Initially, patients had to have a performance status (PS) of ≤2 and prior exposure to CD20-targeted therapy, an alkylating agent, and a steroid with no upper limit. Criteria were modified to PS of 0 or 1 and at least 1 to ≤3 prior therapies (identified as the target population) after observing an initially high frequency of rapid disease progression in patients with extensive prior therapies or poor PS.ResultsThe study was stopped early following an interim analysis, despite surpassing the protocol predetermined futility boundary, because the ORR was below the expectations of response in an evolving DLBCL treatment landscape. The final analysis included all 45 enrolled patients and demonstrated an ORR of 11%. In the response evaluable subset (n = 26), defined as patients in the target population with exposure to ≥8 doses of PNT2258 within the first 35 days and evaluable baseline/post-baseline scans, the ORR was 19%. The most common adverse events were fatigue (44%), nausea (42%), diarrhea (40%), pyrexia (36%), anemia (32%), and vomiting (27%).ConclusionsPNT2258 was well-tolerated in a chemotherapy refractory DLBCL population. Despite demonstration of single-agent activity, ORR was lower than acceptable for further new therapy development.     

A Phase I/II Trial of Panobinostat in Combination With Lenalidomide in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

BackgroundLenalidomide and panobinostat have shown single-agent efficacy of 14% to 50% and 27% to 58%, respectively, in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This phase I/II study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of lenalidomide combined with panobinostat in relapsed/refractory HL.Patients and MethodsIn the phase I trial, previously treated patients with classical or lymphocyte-predominant HL received escalating doses of lenalidomide on days 1 to 21 and panobinostat 3 times a week (TIW) every 28 days. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined during cycle 1. When the MTD was determined, a phase II study was conducted to determine overall response (OR).ResultsTwenty-four patients enrolled; 11 in the phase I and 13 in phase II portions. No DLTs were observed but 2 patients who received 25 mg lenalidomide and 20 mg panobinostat experienced neutropenia and thrombocytopenia > 14 days in cycle 2, leading to selection of 25 mg lenalidomide on days 1 to 21 and 15 mg panobinostat TIW for the phase II dose. In all 24 patients, Grade 3 to 4 toxicities consisted of neutropenia (58%), thrombocytopenia (42%), lymphopenia (25%), and febrile neutropenia (25%). OR was 16.7% (2 complete response [CR] and 2 partial response). One patient with CR had lymphocyte-predominant HL and received 22 cycles. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.8 and 16.4 months, respectively.ConclusionAlthough the combination of panobinostat and lenalidomide appears safe in patients with relapsed/refractory HL, the limited efficacy and significant rates of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia observed do not support further evaluation of this combination in HL.