Treatment Intensification With Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Lenalidomide Maintenance Improves Survival Outcomes of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in Complete Response

Background

High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) and maintenance treatment with novel agents are the best options for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, increasing the rate of complete response (CR) and prolonging progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Indeed, the achievement of a CR is a predictor of long-term survival among transplant-eligible patients. However, it is unclear whether patients reaching a CR after induction treatment could receive less intense consolidation or avoid maintenance therapy.

造血干细胞支持下大剂量LACE方案对27例难治复发性淋巴瘤疗效观察

目的:评价在造血干细胞支持下,LACE预处理方案对难治性、复发性淋巴瘤临床疗效.方法:自2001年3月至2003年7月对27例难治性、复发性淋巴瘤在造血干细胞支持下,应用LACE预处理方案:罗氮芥(L)200mg/m2,1次口服(移植前第7天),足叶乙甙(E)1g/m2,静脉点滴(移植前第7天),阿糖胞苷(A)2g/m2×d-1,静脉点滴(移植前第6、5天),环磷酰胺(C)1.8/m2×d-1,静脉点滴(移植前第4、3、2天),0天进行自体干细胞输注并进行随访观察.结果:27例患者均可耐受化疗,无移植相关死亡病例,并对移植后的患者进行随访观察,随访中位期14个月(7～35),6例复发,21例缓解.统计分析2年无瘤生存率可达70%,预计5年生存率可达55%.结论:对难治性复发性淋巴瘤,在造血干细胞支持下,LACE方案是较好的一种预处理方案.     

Early Access Program Results From Turkey and a Literature Review on Daratumumab Monotherapy Among Heavily Pretreated Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma

BackgroundIn countries where frontline drug approval is limited to first-generation proteasome inhibitors or immunomodulatory drugs, relapses have been both more frequent and less durable. We investigated real world data on the efficacy and safety of daratumumab monotherapy among patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) from Turkey using a prospective early access program.Patients and MethodsA total of 42 patients with RRMM after a minimum of 3 previous lines of proteasome inhibitor/immunomodulatory drug-based treatments were included from 25 centers across Turkey. Daratumumab monotherapy was administered intravenously at a dose of 16 mg/kg weekly (cycles 1-2), on alternate weeks (cycles 3-6), and monthly thereafter.ResultsThe median daratumumab monotherapy duration was 5.5 months (range, 0.2-28.7 months). The overall response rate was 45.2%, including 14 (33.3%) partial responses, 4 (9.5%) very good partial responses, and 1 (2.4%) complete response. The median duration of response was 4.9 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 (95% confidence interval, 2.6-8.4 months) with 12- and 18-month PFS rates of 35.7% and 31.0%, respectively. The median overall survival was not reached; the 12- and 18-month overall survival rates were 64.3% and 59.5%, respectively. The depth of response had a significant effect on PFS (log-rank test, P = .026). Overall, of the 76 adverse events reported, 33 (43.4%) were grade ≥ 3; only 4 (9.52%) were grade 3 infusion-related reactions. No infusion-related reactions or adverse events led to treatment discontinuation.ConclusionThe present findings from our daratumumab early access program have confirmed the efficacy and safety profile of daratumumab monotherapy in heavily pretreated Turkish patients with RRMM.     

A Phase II Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundVenetoclax is a selective BCL-2 inhibitor with clinical activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Combinations of venetoclax with agents that have complementary mechanisms of action may improve venetoclax efficacy in RRMM. This study evaluated venetoclax with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (VenPd) in RRMM.Patients and MethodsThis phase II open label study (NCT03567616) evaluated VenPd in patients with RRMM who had received ≥ 1 prior therapy and were refractory to lenalidomide. Venetoclax was administered orally daily for days 1 to 28, pomalidomide was administered orally daily for days 1 to 21, and dexamethasone was administered weekly for each 28-day cycle. The primary objective was to characterize the safety and tolerability of VenPd. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the efficacy and pharmacokinetics. The study was terminated early due to partial clinical hold and decision to pursue biomarker driven strategy.ResultsEight patients were enrolled. Patients had a median age of 67.5 years. All patients received 400 mg venetoclax; 4 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities and the dose was not escalated. All patients had a grade ≥ 3 adverse event, and the most common was neutropenia (n = 6); cytopenias were the most prevalent adverse events. Five patients (63%) had a confirmed response, and the median duration of response was 12.9 months. The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months.ConclusionsGiven the limited enrollment, no clear safety or efficacy conclusions about VenPd can be drawn. Preliminary safety data, particularly the occurrence of cytopenias, can be used to guide dosing strategies for future combinations of venetoclax with immunomodulatory agents.     

Outcomes After Salvage Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Institution Experience

BackgroundThe role of salvage autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (sAHCT2) for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the era of modern therapeutics is unclear. As prospective data is limited, we conducted a retrospective analysis to determine the outcomes of sAHCT2.Patients and methodsWe conducted a single-institution, retrospective analysis of patients who received sAHCT2 at The Ohio State University from 2000 to 2018. Patients who received a second transplant as part of a planned tandem or autologous-allogeneic transplant were excluded.ResultsFifty-seven patients were treated with sAHCT2. Patients had a median of 2 lines of therapy after AHCT1 prior to their sAHCT2; 70% had prior immunomodulatory imide drugs, 82% had prior proteasome inhibitor, and 20% had prior anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies as part of re-induction therapy. Forty-two percent of patients attained ≥VGPR prior to sAHCT2. Seventy-four were treated with melphalan 200 mg/m² as conditioning regimen before infusion of a median of 3.8 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg. Fifty-eight percent patients had maintenance therapy and 81% patients attained CR/VGPR as the best response after sAHCT2. The median PFS and OS after sAHCT2 were 1.6 and 3.6 years, respectively. On multivariable analysis, high-risk cytogenetics, not having attained CR/VGPR, and having more than 2 lines of therapy post-AHCT1 were associated with inferior PFS. Melphalan 140 mg/m² compared to melphalan 200 mg/m² and no maintenance therapy compared to maintenance therapy were not associated with inferior PFS. There was no transplant-related mortality in this patient cohort.ConclusionsFor MM patients deriving durable remission after their AHCT1, sAHCT2 was safe and resulted in deep and durable remissions.     

Isatuximab-Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone in East Asian Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: ICARIA-MM Subgroup Analysis

BackgroundIn the pivotal phase III, randomized, multicenter ICARIA-MM study (NCT02990338), isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-Pd) improved progression-free survival and overall response rate versus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) in the overall population of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.Patients and MethodsIn this predefined subgroup analysis, efficacy, and safety between East Asian patients and the overall population were assessed.ResultsIn total, 36 East Asian patients were included (Japanese, n = 13; Korean, n = 9; Taiwanese, n = 14). At a median follow-up of 11.6 months, median progression-free survival was not reached (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.80–not calculable) in the Isa-Pd arm and was 7.9 months (95% CI 2.90–not calculable) in the Pd arm. The hazard ratio for the between-group difference was 0.52 (95% CI 0.19-1.39), which was similar to the overall population (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI 0.44-0.82). No new safety signals were observed, except that a higher proportion of patients in the East Asian population experienced Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia compared with the overall population.ConclusionThese results confirm the efficacy of Isa-Pd in East Asian patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, and the related safety data are consistent with those observed in the overall population and are manageable.     

Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: Effect of Age

BackgroundIn the novel and pre–novel agent era, high-dose therapy, followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT), has been shown to prolong survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in randomized trials. However, these trials only included patients aged ≤ 65 years. Given that the median age at diagnosis is 66 years, it is important to know the outcomes of AHCT in older patients. Similarly, definite outcomes of AHCT in very young patients (aged < 50 years) are also lacking because they represent a very small proportion of patients in clinical trials.Materials and MethodsWe analyzed a consecutive cohort of patients with MM receiving AHCT from 2000 to 2015 in 2 different age groups, older (> 70 years) and younger (≤ 50 years), and compared the outcomes. The primary objectives were to assess overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and nonrelapse mortality in these 2 groups.ResultsOf the 191 patients, 86 were young (age ≤ 50 years) and 105 were old (age > 70 years). The younger patients had better performance status and a lower comorbidity index, and most of the older patients had received a melphalan dose of 140 to 180 mg/m². The median follow-up period for the young group was 33 months (range, 2-164 months) compared with 22.5 months (range, 3-133 months) in the old group (P = .02). The PFS rate at 1 year was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46%-72%) for the young group and 58% (95% CI, 45%-69%) for the old group. The overall survival rate at 1 year was 92% (95% CI, 84%-96%) for the young group and 85% (95% CI, 76%-91%) for the old group. On multivariate analysis, age did not have any effect on survival (P = .82); however, the patients with high-risk cytogenetics (hazard ratio [HR], 2.2; 95% CI, 1.06-4.6; P = .04) had worse overall mortality. High-risk cytogenetics (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5; P = .004) and no disease response or progressive disease at transplantation (HR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.8-13.5; P = .02) were significantly associated with worse PFS.ConclusionAge should not be a limiting factor in considering the modality of AHCT. However, younger patients might also benefit from additional novel treatment approaches in the setting of clinical trials, given their similar outcomes with the older patients in our study.     

Oprozomib,pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

IntroductionThis phase Ib study evaluated oprozomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).Patients and MethodsPatients received oprozomib once-daily on days 1 to 5 and 15 to 19 (5/14 schedule; 150 mg/day starting dose) or on 2 consecutive days weekly (2/7 schedule; 210 mg/day starting dose) of 28-day cycles, pomalidomide on days 1 to 21 (4 mg/day starting dose), and dexamethasone 20 mg on 2 consecutive days weekly. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation schema was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose.ResultsThirty-one patients were treated (5/14, n = 4; 2/7, n = 27). Oprozomib maximum tolerated dose was not defined. The 2/7 schedule (oprozomib 210 mg/day, pomalidomide 4 mg/day) was selected for dose expansion based on overall safety (n = 17). In this group, the most common adverse events (AEs) were gastrointestinal (diarrhea [88.2%], nausea [58.8%], and vomiting [58.8%]); grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal AEs were uncommon. The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were hematologic (anemia [47.1%], neutropenia [35.3%], and thrombocytopenia [29.4%]). One dose-limiting toxicity (gastric hemorrhage) occurred; 3 patients discontinued owing to AEs. The overall response rate was 70.6%.ConclusionSafety and pharmacokinetic profiles were concerns with the oprozomib formulation used in this study and need to be improved. Oprozomib-pomalidomide-dexamethasone (2/7 schedule) had encouraging efficacy, supporting an ongoing phase Ib study evaluating new oprozomib formulations for this combination in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.     

Daratumumab,Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone versus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Chinese Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Analysis of LEPUS

BackgroundIn the phase 3 LEPUS study, daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-Vd) demonstrated significant clinical benefit versus Vd alone in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we report updated efficacy and safety results from LEPUS.Patients and MethodsChinese patients with ≥ 1 prior line of therapy were randomized 2:1 to bortezomib (1.3 mg/m²) and dexamethasone (20 mg) for eight cycles ± daratumumab (16 mg/kg) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsIn total, 211 patients were randomized to D-Vd (n = 141) or Vd (n = 70). At a 25.1-month median follow-up, D-Vd prolonged PFS versus Vd (median, 14.8 vs. 6.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.51; P < .00001). PFS benefit of D-Vd versus Vd was maintained across prespecified subgroups, including patients with prior bortezomib (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.53), patients who were refractory to last prior line of therapy (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.65), and patients with high-risk cytogenetics (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.71). Overall response rate (84.7% vs.66.7%; P = .00314) and rates of very good partial response or better (71.5% vs. 34.9%; P < .00001) and complete response or better (40.1% vs 14.3%; P = .00016) were higher with D-Vd versus Vd. No new safety concerns were identified.ConclusionsIn this updated analysis, D-Vd maintained significant efficacy benefits versus Vd alone and demonstrated a consistent safety profile, further supporting the use of D-Vd as a standard of care in Chinese patients with RRMM.     

Consolidative Radiotherapy After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Introduction

We evaluated the role of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Brazilian Experience Using High-Dose Sequential Chemotherapy Followed by Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

PurposeWe evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of high-dose sequential chemotherapy (HDS) as salvage therapy in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.Patients and MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis on 77 patients receiving HDS between 1998 and 2006. Patients enrolled were in disease progression or relapsed disease, or did not achieve a complete remission after first-line treatment. HDS consisted of the sequential administration of cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with stem cell harvesting, followed by methotrexate plus vincristine and etoposide.ResultsThe majority of patients had stage III/IV (64%) and B symptoms (71.4%). Disease status improvement after HDS was observed in 24 of 57 patients (42%) previously in disease progression or relapse. HDS-related deaths occurred in 8 of 77 patients (10.4%). Four patients (5.2%) developed acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome. Overall, disease-free and progression-free survival was 27%, 57%, and 25%, respectively.ConclusionDespite the treatment-related mortality, HDS is feasible, with satisfactory response rates, even in patients with poor prognosis.     

Optimal Supportive Care With Selinexor Improves Outcomes in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundSupportive care improves outcomes in many cancers. In the pivotal STORM study selinexor, a first-in-class, oral, selective exportin 1 inhibitor, and low-dose dexamethasone proved to be an effective treatment for patients with triple-class refractory myeloma. We conducted a post-hoc analysis to test the hypothesis that increased utilization of supportive care measures in a sub-cohort of the STORM study prolonged treatment duration with- and improved efficacy of- selinexor.Materials and MethodsThe STORM protocol included specific recommendations for dose modifications and supportive care to mitigate selinexor most common adverse events (AEs) including nausea, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. The Tisch Cancer Center at Mount Sinai School of Medicine (MSSM) incorporated additional supportive care strategies within the framework of the STORM protocol.ResultsOf 123 patients enrolled in STORM, 28 were enrolled at MSSM. The overall response rate was 26.2% in the overall STORM population and 53.6% in the MSSM cohort. Moreover, duration of response, progression free survival, and overall survival were longer in the MSSM cohort. AEs and dose modification events were similar in the 2 groups. The MSSM cohort had more dose reductions (67.9% vs. 50.5%), and higher use of multiple antiemetic agents (71.4% vs. 50.1%) and romiplostim (32.1% vs. 6.3%), but less discontinuations due to treatment-related AEs (3.6% vs. 25.3%).ConclusionThese results suggests that in addition to more frequent dose reductions, prompter and more aggressive supportive care may have contributed to the low discontinuation rate, longer duration therapy, and greater efficacy rates observed in the MSSM cohort. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02336815).     

Outcomes in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Treated With or Without Autologous or Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BackgroundOutcomes in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) have improved; however, a significant number of patients still relapse despite receiving all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic-based therapies.Patients and MethodsOutcomes of patients with relapsed APL who were treated at our institution (1980-2010) and who received HCT were compared with those who received chemotherapy (CT) only.ResultsAmong 40 patients, 24 received HCT (autologous [auto] HCT, 7; allogeneic [allo] HCT, 14; both, 3); 16 received CT only. The median age at diagnosis was 36 years (range, 13-50 years), 31 years (range, 16-58 years), and 44 years (range, 24-79 years) for the auto-HCT, allo-HCT, and CT groups, respectively. Ten (100%) patients who received auto-HCT and 12 (71%) who received allo-HCT were in complete remission at the time of the HCT. The median follow-ups in the auto-HCT, allo-HCT, and CT groups were 74 months (range, 26-135 months), 118 months (range, 28-284 months), and 122 months (range, 32-216 months), respectively. Transplantation-related mortality (1 year) after auto-HCT and allo-HCT were 10% and 29%, respectively. The 7-year event-free survival after auto-HCT and allo-HCT was 68.6% and 40.6%, respectively (P = .45). The 7-year overall survival was 85.7%, 49.4%, and 40% in the auto-HCT, allo-HCT, and CT groups, respectively (P = .48).ConclusionBoth auto-HCT and allo-HCT are associated with durable remission and prolonged survival. All 3 strategies (auto-HCT, allo-HCT, CT) were found to be feasible in the relapsed APL setting and result in long-term disease control in selected patients. In this retrospective analysis, overall survival for patients who received HCT was not significantly better than patients who received CT only, but a trend toward better outcomes was seen in patients who underwent auto-HCT, although not statistically significant.     

Randomized Clinical Trial Representativeness and Outcomes in Real-World Patients: Comparison of 6 Hallmark Randomized Clinical Trials of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundConcern has been increasing in oncology regarding randomized clinical trial (RCT) eligibility limiting the generalizability of the findings to real-world populations. Using a large US electronic health record database, we investigated the real-world generalizability of the findings from recent RCTs for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).Patients and MethodsPatients with RRMM initiating second-to fourth-line therapy with the control arm of the following RCTs were retrospectively identified and categorized as “RCT eligible” or “RCT ineligible” according to the eligibility criteria: (1) Rd (lenalidomide, dexamethasone)—ASPIRE, TOURMALINE-MM1, POLLUX, and ELOQUENT-2; and (2) Vd (bortezomib, dexamethasone)—CASTOR and ENDEAVOR. Predictors of RCT ineligibility and overall survival were analyzed using logistic regression and Cox regression analysis.ResultsVariations in the individual trial ineligibility rates were noted, with up to 72.3% (range, 47.9%-72.3%) of patients not meeting the eligibility criteria for 1 of the 6 hallmark RCTs (n = 788 for Rd; n = 477 for Vd). Other malignancies, cardiovascular disease, acute infection, and renal dysfunction were the common reasons for ineligibility. Advanced age, Charlson comorbidity score of ≥ 2, later therapy lines (3-4), and refractory status to the previous line were independently predictive of RCT ineligibility. RCT-ineligible versus RCT-eligible patients had a significantly greater mortality risk (hazard ratio, Rd, 1.46; Vd, 1.51).ConclusionMost real-world patients with RRMM were ineligible for the hallmark RCTs. The eligibility rates varied across the RCTs, underlining the flawed nature of cross-study comparisons without RCT validation. Overall survival was significantly affected by the inability to meet the criteria, highlighting the limited generalizability of the RCT results. Greater efforts are required to broaden the eligibility criteria to reflect real-world clinical characteristics and narrow the gap between RCT efficacy and the observed effectiveness in real-world patients with RRMM.     

Durable Survival Outcomes in Primary and Secondary Central Nervous System Lymphoma After High-dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Using a Thiotepa,Busulfan, and Cyclophosphamide Conditioning Regimen

BackgroundHigh-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been investigated in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with CNS involvement and has shown promising results.Patients and MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed of 48 consecutive patients who had undergone HDC/ASCT with TBC (thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide) conditioning for PCNSL (27 patients), secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) (8 patients), or relapsed disease with CNS involvement (13 patients) from July 2006 to December 2017. Of the 27 patients with PCNSL, 21 had undergone ASCT at first complete remission (CR1).ResultsThe 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 80.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.9-92.9) and the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 80.1% (95% CI, 69.2%-92.7%) among all patients. The 2-year PFS and OS rate for patients with PCNSL in CR1 was 95.2% (95% CI, 86.6%-100%) and 95.2% (95% CI, 86.6%-100%), respectively. On univariate analysis of the patients with PCNSL, ASCT in CR1 was the only variable statistically significant for outcome (P = .007 for PFS; P = .008 for OS). Among patients with SCNSL or CNS relapse, the 2-year PFS and OS rate were comparable at 75.9% (95% CI, 59.5%-96.8%) and 75.3% (95% CI, 58.6%-98.6%), respectively. The most common side effects were febrile neutropenia (89.6%; of which 66.7% had an infectious etiology identified), nausea/vomiting (85.4%), diarrhea (93.8%), mucositis (89.6%), and electrolyte abnormalities (89.6%). Four patients (8.3%) died of treatment-related overwhelming infection; of these patients, 3 had SCNSL.ConclusionHDC and ASCT using TBC conditioning for both PCNSL and secondary CNS NHL appears to have encouraging long-term efficacy with manageable side effects.     

Belantamab in Combination with Dexamethasone in Patients with Triple-class Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundTriple-class relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) has a poor prognosis. This study analyzed the clinical outcomes of Belantamab mafadotin in combination with dexamethasone (Bd) in triple-class RRMM.MethodsWe identified 35 patients with triple-class RRMM who received Bd at the University of Kansas from October 2019 to November 2021.ResultsThe median age was 66 years (42-85) and the median prior lines of therapy was 5 (3-15). Nineteen (54%) patients had R-ISS stage III disease, 15 (43%) patients had high-risk cytogenetics, and 15 patients (43%) had extramedullary disease (EMD). Eight patients received prior BCMA-targeted therapy. Overall response rate (ORR) was 43%, with 23% achieving very good partial response and better. At a median follow up of 10.7 months, the median progression-free survival and survival were 4.9 and 10.7 months, respectively. The most common adverse event was keratopathy, which occurred in 30 (86%) patients. Twenty-four patients required dose reduction or delay due to keratopathy. Other common toxicities included anemia (83%), thrombocytopenia (80%), neutropenia (34%), and elevated liver function tests (51%).ConclusionOur analysis shows Bd has good activity in triple-class RRMM. Keratopathy remains a challenging AE and the leading cause of dose reduction, delay and treatment cessation.     

Real-World Evidence of Daratumumab Monotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients and Efficacy on Soft-Tissue Plasmacytomas

IntroductionDaratumumab is an anti-CD38 agent that was first investigated as single agent in GEN501 and SIRIUS trials in patients with advanced multiple myeloma (MM). Overall response rate (ORR) was 30% with positive impact on progression-free survival (PFS). However, there is a lack of information regarding plasmacytoma response.Materials and MethodsHere, we described a heavily pretreated group of 43 patients who received daratumumab monotherapy after EMA approval and focused on plasmacytoma response.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 26 months, median time to best response was 2.9 months (range 0.8-13.1), median PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI 2.5 – 8.8) and median OS was 11.2 months (95% CI 6.3 – 17.0). Patients who achieved at least partial response had longer median PFS and OS (12.8 and 20.2 months, respectively) than those who achieved minimal response or stable disease (5.3 and 11.2 months, respectively). Ten patients (23%) had plasmacytomas (70% paraskeletal, 30% extramedullary). The clinical benefit for patients with and without plasmacytomas was 20% versus 42%. A dissociation between serological and plasmacytoma response was observed in 40% of the patients. Thus, 50% of the patients with plasmacytomas achieved at least serological minimal response but only 20% had plasmacytoma response.ConclusionThis is the first real-world study of daratumumab monotherapy that focuses on efficacy data regarding soft-tissue plasmacytomas in patients with relapsed/refractory mieloma, showing a limited benefit in this patient population.     

Modified HyperCVAD Versus Bortezomib-HyperCAD in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy, in which aggressive relapses might require salvage cytotoxic infusional chemotherapy. Several clinical trials that reported the efficacy of bortezomib led to institutional practice changes in which vincristine was replaced with bortezomib in the modified hyperCVAD regimen, creating a new treatment regimen, named “bortezomib-hyperCAD.”

Blood Transfusion Management and Transfusion-Related Outcomes in Daratumumab-Treated Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Introduction

Daratumumab, a human CD38 monoclonal antibody approved for multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, binds red blood cells (RBCs), resulting in panagglutination in compatibility tests. Published mitigation methods avoid additional testing, ensuring timely release of blood products. Blood transfusion management and transfusion-related outcomes of daratumumab-treated patients in the SIRIUS study are reported, with emphasis on 2 clinical sites.

Pomalidomide,Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Real-World Analysis of the Pethema-GEM Experience

IntroductionTreatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is highly challenging, especially for patients with disease refractory to initial therapy, and in particular for disease developing refractoriness to lenalidomide. Indeed, with currently approved treatments, median progression-free survival (PFS) in the lenalidomide-refractory setting is less than 10 months, reflecting the difficulty in treating this patient population. Pomalidomide is a second-generation immunomodulatory drug that has shown activity in lenalidomide-refractory disease in the setting of different combinations.Patients and MethodsA real-world study was conducted by the Spanish Myeloma group in a cohort of patients with RRMM treated with pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (PomCiDex). One hundred patients were treated with a median of 3 prior lines of therapy.ResultsOverall response rate was 39%, with a clinical benefit rate of 93%. Median PFS was 7.6 months; median overall survival (OS) was 12.6 months. Median PFS and OS survival were consistent across the different subgroups analyzed. Prolonged PFS and OS were found in patients with responsive disease.ConclusionOur results compared favorably with those obtained with different pomalidomide-based combinations in a similar patient population. PomCiDex remains a manageable, cost-effective, and all-oral triplet combination for RRMM patients.