Global health training in pediatric residency: a qualitative analysis of faculty director insights

ObjectiveInterest and participation in global health (GH) has been growing rapidly among pediatric residents. Residency programs are responding by establishing formal GH programs. We sought to define key insights in GH education from pediatric residency programs with formal GH tracks.MethodsSeven model pediatric residency programs with formal GH training were identified in 2007. Faculty directors representing 6 of these programs participated in expert interviews assessing 6 categories of questions about GH tracks: understanding how GH tracks establish partnerships with global sites; defining organizational and financing structure of GH tracks; describing resident curriculum and pre-trip preparation; describing clinical experiences of residents in GH tracks; defining evaluation of residents and GH tracks; and defining factors that affect development and ongoing implementation of GH tracks. Data were analyzed using qualitative methodology.ResultsAll programs relied on faculty relationships to establish dynamic partnerships with global sites. All programs acknowledged resident burden on GH partners. Strategies to alleviate burden included improving resident supervision and providing varying models of GH curricula and pre-trip preparation, generally based on core residency training competencies. Support and funding for GH programs are minimal and variable. Resident experiences included volunteer patient care, teaching, and research. Commitment of experienced faculty and support from institutional leadership facilitated implementation of GH programs.ConclusionsDirectors of 6 model GH programs within pediatric residencies provided insights that inform others who want to establish successful GH partnerships and resident training that will prepare trainees to meet global child health needs.     

Look Who's Talking: A Survey of Pediatric Program Directors on Communication Skills Education in Pediatric Residency Programs

ObjectiveTo determine current practices for communication skills curriculum and assessment in pediatric residency programs and to identify programs’ greatest needs regarding communication curricula and assessment.MethodsWe surveyed pediatric residency program directors about their programs’ approach to teaching and assessing residents’ communication skills and how satisfied they were with their curricula and assessment of competence. Respondents were asked about their programs’ greatest needs for teaching and assessing communication skills.ResultsResponse rate was 41% (82/202). Most programs did teach communication skills to residents; only 14% provided no formal training. Programs identified various 1) educational formats for teaching communication skills, 2) curricular content, and 3) assessment methods for determining competence. Many programs were less than satisfied with their curriculum and the accuracy of their assessments. The greatest programmatic need regarding curricula was time, while the greatest need for assessment was a tool.ConclusionsWhile teaching and assessment of communication skills is common in pediatric residency programs, it is inconsistent and variable, and many programs are not satisfied with their current communication training. There is need for development of and access to appropriate and useful curricula as well as a practical tool for assessment which has been evaluated for validity evidence.     

Three Years of X + Y Scheduling: Longitudinal Assessment of Resident and Faculty Perceptions

ObjectiveFive pediatric residency programs implemented true X + Y scheduling in 2018 where residents have continuity clinic in “blocks” rather than half-day per week experiences. We report the impact X + Y scheduling has on pediatric resident and faculty perceptions of patient care and other educational experiences over a 3-year timeframe.MethodsElectronic surveys were sent to residents and faculty of the participating programs prior to implementing X + Y scheduling and annually thereafter (2018–2021). Survey questions measured resident and faculty perception of continuity clinic schedule satisfaction and the impact of continuity clinic schedules on inpatient and subspecialty rotations. Data were analyzed using z-tests for proportion differences.ResultsOne hundred and eight six residents were sent the survey preimplementation and 254 to 289 postimplementation with response rates ranging from 47% to 69%. Three hundred and seventy-eight to 395 faculty members were sent the survey with response rates ranging from 26% to 51%. Statistically significant (P < .05) sustained perceived improvements over 3 years with X+Y were seen in outpatient continuity, inpatient workflow, and time for teaching both inpatient and in continuity clinic.ConclusionsX + Y scheduling can lead to perceived improvements in various aspects of pediatric residency programs. Our study demonstrates these improvements have been sustained over 3 years in the participating programs.     

Impact of X+Y Scheduling on Pediatric Resident and Faculty Perceptions of Education and Patient Care

PurposeTraditional half-day per week continuity clinic experiences can lead to fragmented education in both the inpatient and outpatient arenas. Five pediatric residency programs were granted the ability from the ACGME to create X+Y scheduling where residents have continuity clinic in “blocks” rather than half-day per week experiences. The aim of this study is to assess the impact X+Y scheduling has on pediatric resident and faculty perceptions of patient care and other educational experiences.MethodsElectronic surveys were sent to residents and faculty of the participating programs both prior to and 12 months after implementing X+Y scheduling. Survey questions measured resident and faculty perception of continuity clinic schedule satisfaction and the impact of continuity clinic schedules on inpatient and subspecialty rotation experiences using a 5-point Likert Scale. Data were analyzed using z-tests for proportion differences for those answering Agree or Strongly Agree between baseline and post-implementation respondents.ResultsHundred and twenty-six out of 186 residents (68%) responded preimplementation and 120 out of 259 residents (47%) responded post-implementation. 384 faculty members were sent the survey with 51% response pre-implementation and 26% response at 12 months. Statistically significant (P < .05) improvements were noted in resident and faculty perceptions of ability to have continuity with patients and inpatient workflow affected by clinic scheduling.ConclusionsFrom both resident and faculty perspectives, X+Y scheduling may improve several aspects of patient care and education. X+Y scheduling could be considered as a potential option by pediatric residency programs, especially if validated with more objective data.     

The Development of an Instrument for Faculty to Assess Resident-Led Large Group Teaching

ObjectiveThe Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education requires residents to teach and many residency programs assess resident teaching competency. While much formal resident-led teaching is for large groups, no corresponding published assessment instrument with validity evidence exists. We developed an instrument for faculty to assess pediatric resident-led large group teaching and gathered preliminary validity evidence.MethodsLiterature review and our experience leading resident-as-teacher curricula informed initial instrument content. Resident focus groups from 3 northeastern pediatric residency programs provided stakeholder input. A modified Delphi panel of international experts provided iterative feedback. Three investigators piloted the instrument in 2018; each assessed 8 video recordings of resident-led teaching. We calculated Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and intraclass correlation (ICC) for inter-rater reliability.ResultsThe instrument has 6 elements: learning climate, goals/objectives, content, promotion of understanding/retention, session management, and closure. Each element contains behavioral subelements. Cronbach's alpha was .844. ICC was excellent for 6 subelements, good for 1, fair for 1, and poor for 3.ConclusionsWe developed an instrument for faculty assessment of resident-led large group teaching. Pilot data showed assessed behaviors had good internal consistency, but inconsistent interrater reliability. With further development, this instrument has potential to assess resident teaching competency.     

Faculty and Peer Support During Pediatric Residency: Association With Performance Outcomes,Race, and Gender

PurposeTo examine the association of resident perception of colleague and faculty support with performance, as measured by milestones-based competency scores, exploring associations between race and gender and perception of support and milestone scoring.MethodsResident satisfaction was measured using an annual survey of residents at 49 pediatric residency programs in 2016, 2017, and 2018. Satisfaction with colleague and faculty support was measured using Likert scale survey questions. Pediatric Milestone Competency scores were obtained from the Association of Pediatric Program Directors’ Longitudinal Educational Assessment Research Network. Analysis included linear fixed-effects models to examine the relationship between support satisfaction, race, gender, and spring milestone scores.ResultsOver 60% of eligible residents responded to the survey. The majority of residents were satisfied with colleague and faculty support, with those identifying as Asian or underrepresented in medicine (URM) reporting lower rates of satisfaction than White peers. Residents satisfied with colleague support had higher milestone scores compared to those with a neutral degree of satisfaction. Residents reporting dissatisfaction with colleague and faculty support had lower milestone scores in most competency domains. Residents identifying as URM had lower milestone scores than White residents, which was partially mediated by lower rates of support satisfaction.ConclusionsResident satisfaction with colleague and faculty support correlates with milestone performance. In particular, dissatisfied residents have lower scores than those who are neutral or satisfied. Racial inequities in resident milestone scores may be partially driven by lower rates of support satisfaction among underrepresented residents.     

Training in community pediatrics: a national survey of program directors.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the spectrum of residency training in community-based settings, assess the extent of resident education on community pediatrics topics, and determine whether educational activities vary by program size or availability of primary care tracks. METHODS: Survey of US pediatric residency program directors from May-September 2002. A 10-item self-administered questionnaire assessed the programs' extent of resident involvement in 15 selected community-based settings and inclusion of didactic or practical education regarding 13 community health topics. RESULTS: Of 168 programs surveyed (81% response rate), 40% were small (< or =30 residents), 35% were medium (31-50 residents), 25% were large (>50 residents), and 15% had primary care tracks. Frequently required community-based settings included schools (69%), child protection teams (62%), day care centers (57%), and home visiting (48%). Of 15 community-based settings, 28% required involvement in fewer than 4, 41% required involvement in 4-6, and 31% required involvement in 7 or more. More than two-thirds offered didactic teaching and practical experience on issues related to managed care, cultural competency, and the mental health and social service systems. There were no differences in the number of required community-based settings by program size or presence of primary care tracks. CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatric residency programs require exposure to community-based settings and provide education on various community health topics. Ongoing challenges include continued implementation amid work duty hour limitations, best practice models for practical implementation of community-based experience into residency training, and the impact of such training on future involvement in the community and physician practice.     

A Proposed Model Curriculum in Global Child Health for Pediatric Residents

ObjectiveIn response to the increasing engagement in global health (GH) among pediatric residents and faculty, academic GH training opportunities are growing rapidly in scale and number. However, consensus to guide residency programs regarding best practice guidelines or model curricula has not been established. We aimed to highlight critical components of well-established GH tracks and develop a model curriculum in GH for pediatric residency programs.MethodsWe identified 43 existing formal GH curricula offered by U.S. pediatric residency programs in April 2011 and selected 8 programs with GH tracks on the basis of our inclusion criteria. A working group composed of the directors of these GH tracks, medical educators, and trainees and faculty with GH experience collaborated to develop a consensus model curriculum, which included GH core topics, learning modalities, and approaches to evaluation within the framework of the competencies for residency education outlined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.ResultsCommon curricular components among the identified GH tracks included didactics in various topics of global child health, domestic and international field experiences, completion of a scholarly project, and mentorship. The proposed model curriculum identifies strengths of established pediatric GH tracks and uses competency-based learning objectives.ConclusionsThis proposed pediatric GH curriculum based on lessons learned by directors of established GH residency tracks will support residency programs in creating and sustaining successful programs in GH education. The curriculum can be adapted to fit the needs of various programs, depending on their resources and focus areas. Evaluation outcomes need to be standardized so that the impact of this curriculum can be effectively measured.     

Going Virtual: Objective Structured Teaching Exercises as an Innovative Method for Formative Resident Education

BackgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic forced residency programs to adapt teaching to the virtual arena. Objective Structured Teaching Exercises (OSTEs) are a simulation-based session we previously implemented in our in-person pediatric curriculum. We aimed to assess feasibility of and resident satisfaction with the transition to virtual learning for simulation-based OSTEs.MethodsThe pediatrics residency program at our hospital has a weekly academic half-day for residents where the OSTEs were held annually in person 2018 to 2019 and virtually in 2020. Surveys were collected from participating residents and faculty to compare teaching experience, feedback quality, and satisfaction with the session.ResultsOver 3 academic years, there were 159 total teaching sessions, 3 of which were OSTEs. The OSTE session was highly rated each year and was the second highest rated virtual session. Residents felt the OSTEs improved their teaching regardless of the virtual versus in-person platform (P = .77), and the quality of feedback as rated by the resident teacher was higher for virtual sessions (P < .001).ConclusionsTransitioning the OSTE to a virtual platform was both feasible and effective when compared to the in-person OSTE. In the transition to virtual learning, educators should consider opportunities for simulation-based teaching such as OSTEs.     

Substance abuse education in pediatrics

Historically, physicians have received little formal education related to alcohol or other drug abuse and dependence. A survey of all pediatric programs in the United States was conducted to assess the current status of alcohol/drug education in pediatrics. At the medical student and residency training levels, only 44% and 40% of programs, respectively, required any formal instruction, and only 27% and 34%, respectively, offered an elective for medical students or residents. Although most respondents endorsed the inclusion of both required and elective alcohol and drug education in the curriculum, few programs that did not include it already had a future plan for it. Major impediments identified were curriculum time constraints (86% medical student level, 68% resident level) and the lack of a qualified instructor (55% medical student level, 50% resident level). The survey results suggest a strong need for development of faculty and structured alcohol and drug abuse educational plans specific to pediatrics.     

Observation of resident clinical skills: outcomes of a program of direct observation in the continuity clinic setting

ObjectiveTo assess the feasibility of a new multi-institutional program of direct observation and report what faculty observed and the feedback they provided.MethodsA program of direct observation of real patient encounters was implemented in 3 pediatric residency programs using a structured clinical observation (SCO) form to document what was observed and the feedback given. Outcome variables included the number of observations made, the nature of the feedback provided, resident attitudes about direct observation before and after implementation, and the response of the faculty.ResultsSeventy-nine preceptors and 145 residents participated; 320 SCO forms were completed. Faculty provided feedback in 4 areas: content, process of the encounter, patient-centered attitudes and behaviors, and interpersonal skills. Feedback was 85% specific and 41% corrective. Corrective feedback was most frequent for physical examination skills. After program implementation, residents reported an increase in feedback and a decrease in discomfort with direct observation; in addition, they agreed that direct observation was a valuable component of their education. Participation rates among faculty were high.ConclusionsDirect observation using SCOs results in timely and specific feedback to residents about behaviors rarely observed in traditional precepting models. Resident competency in these clinical skill domains is critical for assessing, diagnosing, and managing patients. The SCO methodology is a feasible way to provide formative feedback to residents about their clinical skills.     

Community pediatrics: a consistent focus in residency training from 2002 to 2005.

OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in community pediatrics training from 2002 to 2005. METHODS: Pediatric residency program directors were surveyed in 2002 and 2005 to assess resident training experiences in community pediatrics. Program directors reported on the following: provision of training in community settings; inclusion of didactic and practical teaching on community health topics; resident involvement in legislative, advocacy, and community-based research activities; and emphasis placed on specific resources and training during resident recruitment. Cross-sectional and matched-pair analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 168 program directors participated in 2002 (81% response rate), and 161 participated in 2005 (79% response rate). In both years, more than 50% of programs required resident involvement with schools, child care centers, and child protection teams. Compared with 2002, in 2005, more programs included didactic training on legislative advocacy (69% vs 53%, P < .01) and offered a practical experience in this area (53% vs 40%, P < .05). In 2005, program directors reported greater resident involvement in providing legislative testimony (P < .05), and greater emphasis was placed on child advocacy training during resident recruitment (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In the last several years, there has been a consistent focus on legislative activities and child advocacy in pediatric residency programs. These findings suggest a strong perceived value of these activities and should inform efforts to rethink the content of general pediatric residency training in the future.     

Justifications for Discrepancies Between Competency Committee and Program Director Recommended Resident Supervisory Roles

ObjectiveTo explore justifications for differences between summative entrustment decisions made about pediatric residents by individuals who are charged with the review of residents (clinical competency committee, or CCC, members) and those who ultimately make final summative decisions about resident performance (program directors, or PDs).MethodsIndividual CCC member and PD supervisory role categorizations were made in the 2015 to 2016 academic year at 14 pediatric residency programs, placing residents into 1 of 5 progressive supervisory roles. When PD recommendations differed from CCC members, a free-text justification was requested. Free-text responses were analyzed using manifest content analysis.ResultsIn total, 801 supervisory role categorizations were made by both CCC members and PDs, with the same recommendations made in 685 cases. In the 116 instances of discrepancy, PDs assigned a lower level of supervisory responsibility (n = 73) more often than a greater one (n = 43). When moving residents to a greater supervisory role category, PDs had more justifications anchored in resident performance than experience. When moving residents to a lower supervisory role categorization, PDs conversely noted experience more than performance.ConclusionsPDs provide more justifications anchored in resident performance when moving residents to a greater supervisory role category compared with CCC members. However, when moving residents to a lower supervisory role categorization, they note experience more than performance. These patterns may or may not be entirely consistent with a competency-based approach and should be explored further.     

A nationwide survey of behavioral pediatric residency training

This survey assessed the prevalence of behavioral pediatric residency training in the U.S., the professional background of faculty, training methods utilized, curriculum content, and barriers to expansion of behavioral training. Questionnaires were returned by 60% of 246 accredited pediatric residency programs; of these, 49% had a "formal" behavioral training program, 38% offered some training, and 13% offered none. Formal programs identified 419 faculty members involved in teaching behavioral pediatrics to residents: physicians (48%), psychologists (21%), social workers (19%), nurses (8%), other (4%). Mandatory training was more frequent than elective training; continuous training was more likely than block rotations to be mandatory. "Inadequate funding" and "lack of appropriately trained faculty" were most frequently cited as barriers to expansion of the teaching of behavioral pediatrics.     

Pediatric Chief Resident Exchange Program—A Novel Method to Share Educational Ideas Across Training Programs

BackgroundPediatric residency programs offer many conferences and activities to meet the educational needs of their residents. We developed and assessed the Pediatric Chief Resident Exchange Program where pediatric chief residents visited another institution for a day with the goal of sharing educational and curricular innovations between residency programs in an experiential manner.Approach/InnovationPediatric chief residents participated in various activities during the exchange including educational conferences and discussions with residency program leadership at the host institutions. Surveys were administered to all participating chiefs to determine if any changes to educational conferences or curriculum were made or planned to be made at their home program based upon what they observed at the other institution and to have chiefs reflect on what they gained from the experience.ResultsTwenty-eight chief residents from 9 programs participated in the exchange program over 3 academic years (2015–2018). All respondents felt the exchange experience was worthwhile. The majority (67%) of programs planned to implement a change at their institution based on participation in the exchange with over half actually making a change by the end of the academic year. Participating chiefs gained a sense of camaraderie, appreciated that other programs experienced similar struggles, and developed further insight into the chief resident role.DiscussionThe Pediatric Chief Resident Exchange Program is a novel method of sharing educational practices between institutions that can lead to curricular changes at participating programs. It can also be an opportunity for chief resident professional development.     

Pediatric Resident Training in the Community Hospital Setting: A Survey of Program Directors

Background and ObjectiveThe role of a hospitalist differs in a community hospital (CH) compared to a university/children's hospital. Residents are required to practice in a variety of relevant clinical settings, but little is known about current trends regarding pediatric resident training in different hospital settings. This study explores CH rotations including their value for resident training, characteristics, benefits, and drawbacks. This study also seeks to define “community hospital.”MethodsAuthors conducted an online cross-sectional survey of pediatric residency program directors distributed by the Association of Pediatric Program Directors. The survey was developed and revised based on review of the literature and iterative input from experts in pediatric resident training and CH medicine. It assessed residency program demographics, availability of CH rotations, value of CH rotations, and their characteristics including benefits and drawbacks.ResultsResponse rate was 56%. CH rotations were required at 24% of residency programs, available as an elective at 46% of programs, and unavailable at 48% of programs. Residency program directors viewed these rotations as valuable for resident training. CH rotations were found to have multiple benefits and drawbacks. Definitions of “community hospital” varied and can be categorized according to positive or negative characteristics.ConclusionsResident rotations at a CH provide valuable learning opportunities with multiple potential benefits that should be weighed against drawbacks in the context of a residency program's curriculum. There are many characteristics that potentially distinguish CH from university/children's hospitals.