Single Institution Experience of Proton and Photon-based Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionPostoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non–small-cell lung cancer remains controversial with studies showing no overall survival (OS) benefit in the setting of excessive cardiopulmonary toxicity. Proton beam therapy (PBT) can potentially reduce toxicity with improved organ-at-risk sparing. We evaluated outcomes of PORT patients treated with PBT and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).Materials and MethodsThis is a retrospective review of 136 PORT patients (61 PBT, 75 IMRT) treated from 2003 to 2016. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess oncologic outcomes. A Cox regression was conducted to identify associated factors. Total toxicity burden (TTB) was defined as grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis, cardiac, or esophageal toxicity.ResultsMedian OS was 76 and 46 months for PBT and IMRT with corresponding 1- and 5-year OS of 85.3%, 50.9% and 89.3%, 37.2% (P = .38), respectively. V30 Gy heart (odds ratio [OR], 144.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91-7214; P = .013) and V5 Gy lung (OR, 15.8; 95% CI, 1.22-202.7; P = .03) were predictive of OS. Organ-at-risk sparing was improved with PBT versus IMRT; mean heart 2.0 versus 7.4 Gy (P < .01), V30 Gy heart 2.6% versus 10.7% (P < .01), mean lung 7.9 versus 10.4 Gy (P = .042), V5 Gy lung 23.4% versus 42.1% (P < .01), and V10 Gy lung 20.4% versus 29.6% (P < .01). TTB was reduced with PBT (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.83; P = .017). Rates of cardiac toxicity were 14.7% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .09). Rates of ≥ grade 2 pneumonitis were 17.0% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .104).ConclusionPBT improved cardiac and lung sparing and reduced toxicity compared with IMRT. Considering the impact of cardiopulmonary toxicity on PORT outcomes, PBT warrants prospective evaluation.     

Women at increased risk for cardiac toxicity following chemoradiation therapy for esophageal carcinoma

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with cardiac toxicity in patients treated with chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for esophageal carcinoma.Methods and MaterialsOne hundred twenty-seven patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus treated from July 2002 to June 2011 at 2 academic institutions with preoperative or definitive CRT were retrospectively reviewed. Association of cardiac toxicity with a number of variables was investigated, including heart disease, cardiac bypass and angioplasty, diabetes, insulin use, smoking, chemotherapy regimen, and tumor location. T test assessed risk of cardiac toxicity secondary to age. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were evaluated for percentage of heart volume receiving > 20, 30, 40, and 50 Gy (V20-V50). The Fisher exact test analyzed for an association between dose volume parameters and cardiac toxicity.ResultsPatient population included 100 men and 27 women with a mean age of 64 years. Median follow-up was 12.7 months (range, 0.3-99.6 months). Any cardiac toxicity occurred in 28 patients, the majority of which were pericardial effusion (23/28). Odds ratio for toxicity in women was 4.15 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63-10.50; P = .0017) and time to cardiac toxicity by sex was significant (P = .0003). Patients above the median cutoff for V20, V30, and V40 had increased odds of developing cardiac toxicity (P = .03, .008, .002). There was 4.0 increased odds of developing cardiac toxicity with V40 > 57% (95% CI, 1.5-10.3, P = .002). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, sex was the only variable associated with any cardiac toxicity and pericardial effusion (P = .0016, P = .0038). None of the other investigated variables were associated with increased risk of cardiac toxicity.ConclusionsFemale patients and dose greater than the median for V20-V40 were associated with the development of cardiac toxicity, specifically pericardial effusion. These data suggest exercising increased care when designing radiation fields in women undergoing CRT for esophageal carcinoma, as pericardial effusion may be a long-term complication.     

Statin Use,Heart Radiation Dose,and Survival in Locally Advanced Lung Cancer

PurposePatients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) have a high prevalence of pre-existing coronary heart disease and face excess cardiac risk after thoracic radiation therapy. We sought to assess whether statin therapy is a predictor of overall survival (OS) after thoracic radiation therapy.Methods and MaterialsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 748 patients with LA-NSCLC treated with thoracic radiation therapy, using Kaplan-Meier OS estimates and Cox regression.ResultsStatin use among high cardiac risk patients (Framingham risk ≥20% or pre-existing coronary heart disease; n = 496) was 51.2%. After adjustment for baseline cardiac risk and other prognostic factors, statin therapy was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.91; P = .048) but not major adverse cardiac events (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.52-2.68; P = .69). Among statin-naïve patients, mean heart dose ≥10 Gy versus <10 Gy was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.68; P = .022), with 2-year OS estimates of 46.9% versus 60.0%, respectively. However, OS did not differ by heart dose among patients on statin therapy (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.76-1.32; P = 1.00; P-interaction = .031), with 2-year OS estimates of 46.9% versus 50.3%, respectively.ConclusionsAmong patients with LA-NSCLC, only half of statin-eligible high cardiac risk patients were on statin therapy, reflecting the highest cardiac risk level of our cohort. Statin use was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality but not major adverse cardiac events. Elevated mean heart dose (≥10 Gy) was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality in statin-naïve patients but not among those on statin therapy, identifying a group of patients in which early intervention with statins may mitigate the deleterious effects of high heart radiation therapy dose. This warrants evaluation in prospective trials.     

Factors Associated With Acute Toxicity in Pediatric Patients Treated With Proton Radiation Therapy: A Report From the Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry

PurposeLimited prospective information regarding acute toxicity in pediatric patients receiving proton therapy (PT) exists. In this study, Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry (PPCR) data was analyzed for factors associated with development of acute toxicity in children receiving passively scattered or pencil beam scanning PT.Methods and MaterialsPediatric patients treated with PT and enrolled on the PPCR from 2016 to 2017 at 7 institutions were included. Data were entered on presence versus absence of acute general, cardiac, endocrine, eye, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, hematologic, mouth, musculoskeletal, neurologic, psychological, respiratory, and skin toxicities before (baseline) and at the end of PT (acute). Associations between patient and treatment variables with development of acute toxicity were assessed with multivariable modeling.ResultsOf 422 patients included, PT technique was passively scattered in 241 (57%), pencil beam scanning in 180 (43%), and missing in 1 (<1%) patient. Median age was 9.9 years. Daily anesthesia for treatment was used in 169 (40%). Treatments were categorized as craniospinal irradiation (CSI; n = 100, 24%), focal central nervous system PT (n = 157, 38%), or body PT (n = 158, 38%). Passively scattered PT was associated with increased risk of hematologic toxicity compared with pencil beam scanning PT (odds ratio [OR]: 3.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-6.70; P = .006). There were no other differences toxicities between PT techniques. Uninsured patients had increased risk of GI (OR: 2.71; 95% CI, 1.12-6.58; P = .027) and hematologic toxicity (OR: 10.67; 95% CI, 2.68-42.46; P <.001). Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy were more likely to experience skin (OR: 2.45; 95% CI, 1.23-4.88; P = .011), hematologic (OR: 2.87; 95% CI, 1.31-6.25; P = .008), GI (OR: 2.37; 95% CI, 1.33-4.21; P = .003), and mouth toxicities (OR: 2.03; 95% CI, 1.10-3.73; P = .024). Patients receiving 49 to 55 Gy were more likely to experience skin (OR: 2.18; 95% CI, 1.06-4.44; P = .033) toxicity than those receiving <49 Gy.ConclusionsThe PPCR registry highlights broad differences in acute toxicity rates in children receiving PT, and identifies opportunities for improvements in prevention, monitoring, and treatment of toxicities.     

New Cardiac Abnormalities After Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Trastuzumab

PurposeTo evaluate cardiac imaging abnormalities after modern radiotherapy and trastuzumab in breast cancer patients.Patients and MethodsAll patients treated with trastuzumab and radiotherapy for breast cancer between 2006 and 2014 with available cardiac imaging (echocardiogram or multigated acquisition scan) were retrospectively analyzed. Cardiac abnormalities included myocardial abnormalities (atrial or ventricular dilation, hypertrophy, hypokinesis, and impaired relaxation), decreased ejection fraction > 10%, and valvular abnormalities (thickening or stenosis of the valve leaflets). Breast laterality (left vs. right) and heart radiation dose volume parameters were analyzed for association with cardiac imaging abnormalities.ResultsA total of 110 patients with 57 left- and 53 right-sided breast cancers were evaluated. Overall, 37 patients (33.6%) developed a new cardiac abnormality. Left-sided radiotherapy was associated with an increase in new cardiac abnormalities (relative risk [RR] = 2.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-4.67; P = .002). Both myocardial and valvular abnormalities were associated with left-sided radiotherapy (myocardial: RR = 2.21; 95% CI, 1.06-4.60; P = .029; valvular: RR = 3.30; 95% CI, 0.98-10.9; P = .044). There was no significant difference in decreased ejection fraction between left- and right-sided radiotherapy (9.6% vs. 2.1%; P = .207). A mean heart dose > 2 Gy as well as volume of the heart receiving 20 Gy (V20), V30, and V40 correlated with cardiac abnormalities (mean heart dose > 2 Gy: RR = 2.00; P = .040).ConclusionNew cardiac abnormalities, including myocardial and valvular dysfunction, are common after trastuzumab and radiotherapy. The incidence of new abnormalities correlates with tumor laterality and cardiac radiation dose exposure. Long-term follow-up is needed to understand the clinical significance of these early imaging abnormalities.     

Impact of Treating Physician on Radiation Therapy Related Severe Toxicities in Men with Prostate Cancer

PurposeThe impact of treating physician on radiation therapy (RT) related toxicity is unclear. We carried out a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled study to determine whether the risk of RT–related late toxicities in patients with prostate cancer varies depending on the treating radiation oncologist.Methods and MaterialsThis is a secondary analysis of a phase 3 randomized controlled study in which patients with prostate cancer with Gleason score ≤7, clinical stage T1b-T3a, and prostate-specific antigen <30 ng/mL were randomized to receive androgen suppression for 6 months, starting either 4 months before or concurrently with definitive prostate radiation therapy. Incidence of late RT–related toxicity was estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. We applied multivariable semiparametric shared frailty models with gamma distribution to determine the between-physician variation in the hazard of late RT–related grade ≥3 gastrointestinal, genitourinary, or overall toxicity. Patient level covariables included age, risk group, year of enrollment, and treatment regimen. Frailty variance, a measure of unexplained heterogeneity, was estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was suggested when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the frailty variance was >0. The Commenges–Andersen test was used for P value estimation.ResultsOverall, 426 patients were treated by 9 radiation oncologists. On log-rank test, there was a significant difference in the cumulative incidence of overall grade ≥3 toxicities (P = .001) and grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity (P = .01) among the physician-based clusters. The frailty variance for overall late grade ≥3 toxicity was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.02-1.39; P = .01). The frailty variance for the grade ≥3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.00-4.20; P = .11) and 0.11 (95% CI, 0.00-1.13; P = .31), respectively.ConclusionsIn our study, the hazard of overall RT-related late grade ≥3 toxicity varied significantly depending on treating radiation oncologist. Further studies are required to explore the underlying processes that lead to such variations in clinical trials involving radiation therapy in prostate cancer.     

Risk of treatment-related esophageal cancer among breast cancer survivors

BackgroundRadiotherapy for breast cancer may expose the esophagus to ionizing radiation, but no study has evaluated esophageal cancer risk after breast cancer associated with radiation dose or systemic therapy use.DesignNested case–control study of esophageal cancer among 289 748 ≥5-year survivors of female breast cancer from five population-based cancer registries (252 cases, 488 individually matched controls), with individualized radiation dosimetry and information abstracted from medical records.ResultsThe largest contributors to esophageal radiation exposure were supraclavicular and internal mammary chain treatments. Esophageal cancer risk increased with increasing radiation dose to the esophageal tumor location (P_trend < 0.001), with doses of ≥35 Gy associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 8.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7–28]. Patients with hormonal therapy ≤5 years preceding esophageal cancer diagnosis had lower risk (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.8). Based on few cases, alkylating agent chemotherapy did not appear to affect risk. Our data were consistent with a multiplicative effect of radiation and other esophageal cancer risk factors (e.g. smoking).ConclusionsEsophageal cancer is a radiation dose-related complication of radiotherapy for breast cancer, but absolute risk is low. At higher esophageal doses, the risk warrants consideration in radiotherapy risk assessment and long-term follow-up.     

Minimising critical organ irradiation in limited stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a dosimetric study of the benefit of involved node radiotherapy

BackgroundChemotherapy plus radiotherapy is the standard of care for patients with limited stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Radiotherapy is evolving from involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) to involved node radiotherapy (INRT) to decrease radiotherapy-related morbidity. In the absence of long-term toxicity data, dose–volume metrics of organs at risk (OAR) provide a surrogate measure of toxicity risk.Patients and methodsTen female patients with stage I–IIA supradiaphragmatic HL were randomly selected. All patients had pre-chemotherapy computerised tomography (CT) and CT–positron emission tomography staging. Using CT planning, three radiotherapy plans were produced per patient: (i) IFRT, (ii) INRT using parallel-opposed beams and (iii) INRT using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Radiotherapy dose was 30.6 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions. OAR evaluated were lungs, breasts, thyroid, heart and coronary arteries.ResultsCompared with IFRT, INRT significantly reduced mean doses to lungs (P < 0.01), breasts (P < 0.01), thyroid (P < 0.01) and heart (P < 0.01), on Wilcoxon testing. Compared with conventional INRT, VMAT improved dose conformality but increased low-dose radiation exposure to lungs and breasts. VMAT reduced the heart volume receiving 30 Gy (V30) by 85%.ConclusionsReduction from IFRT to INRT decreased the volumes of lungs, breasts and thyroid receiving high-dose radiation, suggesting the potential to reduce long-term second malignancy risks. VMAT may be useful for patients with pre-existing heart disease by minimising further cardiac toxicity risks.     

The dosimetric impact of supraclavicular nodal irradiation on the thyroid gland in patients with breast cancer

PurposeThe thyroid is not routinely considered an organ at risk in supraclavicular (SC) nodal radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer. We compared the dosimetric impact of the following 2 RT planning techniques on the thyroid: (1) conventional single anterior field to encompass the SC nodal volume defined clinically; and (2) 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) planning to encompass the computed tomography (CT)-contoured SC nodal volume.Methods and MaterialsThe thyroid, SC nodal volumes, and organs at risk were contoured on the planning CT of 20 patients who received 50 Gy in 2-Gy daily fractions to the breast or chest wall, and SC nodes. Comparisons of dosimetric parameters between the techniques were performed: thyroid, mean and maximum dose, V5, V30, and V50 (percentage of thyroid receiving ≥ 5 Gy, ≥ 30 Gy, and ≥ 50 Gy, respectively); SC nodal volume, homogeneity index (HI, percentage volume receiving 95%-107% of prescribed dose); and maximum doses of spinal cord and brachial plexus. Anatomic characteristics that influenced the dose distributions were investigated.ResultsThe 3DCRT planning technique significantly increased all thyroid dosimetric measures (mean dose 17.2 Gy vs 26.7 Gy; maximum dose 48.5 Gy vs 51.9 Gy; V5 45.7% vs 64.9%; V30 33.7% vs 48%; and V50 0.6% vs 26.7%; P < .001). It improved HI for the SC nodal volumes (P < .001) but resulted in higher maximum doses to the spinal cord (6.1 Gy vs 30 Gy) and brachial plexus (43.2 Gy vs 51.4 Gy). The thyroid volume and depth of SC nodes did not influence the thyroid dose distribution. The depth of SC nodes impacted on the HI of SC nodal volumes in the conventional technique (P = .004).ConclusionsThe 3DCRT planning improved dosimetric coverage of the SC nodal volume but increased thyroid radiation doses. The potential adverse effects of incidental thyroid irradiation should be considered while improving dosimetric coverage in SC nodal irradiation for breast cancer.     

Patient-Specific Heart Constraint: A Tool for Optimization and Evaluation of Mean Heart Dose in Breast Cancer Patients

PurposeOur institution introduced a patient-specific heart constraint (PSHC) and a mean heart dose (MHD) constraint of 4 Gy for all patients receiving breast radiation therapy (RT) with a simultaneous boost (SIB). This was introduced as a method to calculate the predicted MHD before optimizing IMRT fields. We sought to determine whether the introduction of a PSHC reduced MHD, while maintaining optimally dosed treatment plans.Material/MethodsPatients were retrospectively divided into 2 groups, pre- and postintroduction of the PSHC. The breast and SIB Planning Target Volumes (PTVs) were prescribed to 50 Gy and 57 Gy, respectively, in 25 fractions. Plans were generated using a hybrid IMRT technique, 30 Gy using an open tangential field arrangement, and 27 Gy using IMRT fields. The PSHC was calculated using MHD of open tangential field × 2. A paired t test compared PTV coverage and heart doses between cohorts (P < .05 significant).ResultsA total of 264 patients were included (138 pre-PSHC and 126 post-PSHC) with 137 right-sided and 127 left-sided treatments. MHD was significantly reduced across both right-sided (–0.4 Gy, P < .0001) and left-sided (–1.2 Gy, P < .0001) treatments overall. Left-sided treatments were further examined between free breathing and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). DIBH showed reduction in MHD, although it was not significant (–0.46 Gy, P = .34). Heart V5 Gy showed reduction in right-sided (–1%, P = .002) and left-sided (–9.2%, P < .0001) treatments overall. Left-sided free breathing showed significant reduction (–8.8%, P < .0001), and DIBH also showed significant reduction (–5.1%, P = .0034). Tumor bed doses remained above the 54.15 Gy (95% of 57 Gy) threshold for all plans.ConclusionIntroduction of a PSHC can reduce MHD and V5 Gy for patients receiving whole breast RT with SIB while maintaining optimally dosed plans, with the greatest benefit shown for left-sided, free-breathing treatments.     

Dosimetric Predictors of Cardiotoxicity in Thoracic Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer

BackgroundHigher cardiac radiotherapy (RT) doses when treating lung cancer are associated with worse overall survival (OS), although the direct association between cardiac dose and early cardiotoxicity is poorly understood. We hypothesized that RT doses to the heart and cardiac substructures are associated with under-reported early cardiotoxicity and worse OS.Patients and MethodsWe conducted an institutional retrospective review of lung cancer patients treated with conventionally fractionated RT from 2010 to 2015. Collected data included pre-RT cardiac risk factors, post-RT cardiotoxicities, and dose-volume parameters for cardiac substructures. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of cardiotoxicity and OS.ResultsSeventy-six cases were evaluated with 1.2 years median follow-up. Cardiotoxicities included atrial arrhythmia (n = 5), pericardial effusion (n = 16), and valvular disease (n = 1). In univariate analysis, significant dose-volume predictors for cardiotoxicity included mean RT dose to structure of interest, volume of structure of interest receiving ≥30 Gy RT dose, and volume of structure of interest receiving ≥45 Gy RT dose (V45) to the atria, ventricles, and pericardium. Higher ventricular V45 was associated with post-RT cardiotoxicity in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; P = .027). Cardiotoxicity occurrence was a highly significant predictor of OS in multivariate analysis (HR, 12.7; P < .001), but higher ventricular V45 alone was not (HR, 0.78; P = .450).ConclusionEarly cardiac events were relatively common after lung cancer RT and associated with multiple cardiac dose-volume parameters. Occurrence of early cardiotoxicity was strongly associated with worse OS. In practice, early cardiotoxicity is under-reported, supporting the need for more detailed cardiac evaluations in high-risk patients to detect and address early cardiotoxicity.     

Radiation dose and cardiac risk in breast cancer treatment: An analysis of modern radiation therapy including community settings

Purpose

Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer improves outcomes, but prior studies have documented substantive cardiac dose and cardiac risk. We assessed the mean heart dose (MHD) of RT and estimated the risk of RT-associated cardiac toxicity in women undergoing adjuvant RT for breast cancer in contemporary (predominantly) community practice.

Safety and Efficacy of Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost for the Treatment of Spinal Metastases

PurposeIntensity modulated radiation therapy (RT) for spine metastases using a simultaneous integrated boost (SSIB) was shown as an alternative to the treatment of select osseous metastases that are not amenable to spine stereotactic radiosurgery. We sought to update our clinical experience using SSIB in patients for whom dose escalation was warranted but spine stereotactic radiosurgery was not feasible.Methods and MaterialsA total of 58 patients with 63 spinal metastatic sites treated with SSIB between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The gross tumor volume and clinical target volume were prescribed 40 and 30 Gy in 10 fractions, respectively.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 31 months. Of 79% of patients who reported pain before RT with SSIB, 82% reported an improvement following treatment. Patient-reported pain scores on a 10-point scale revealed a significant decrease in pain at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after SSIB (P < .0001). Additionally, there were limited toxicities; only 1 patient suffered grade 3 toxicity (pain) following RT. There were no reports of radiation-induced myelopathy at last follow-up, and 8 patients (13%) experienced a vertebral column fracture post-treatment. Local control was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80%-98%) and 74% (95% CI, 59%-91%) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Overall survival was 64% (95% CI, 53%-78%) and 45% (95% CI, 34%-61%) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The median overall survival was 18 months (95% CI, 13-27 months). Multivariable analysis using patient, tumor, and dosimetric characteristics revealed that a higher Karnofsky performance status before RT (hazard ratio, 0.44, 0.22-0.89; P = .02) was associated with longer survival.ConclusionsThese data demonstrate excellent pain relief and local control with limited acute toxicities following treatment with RT using SSIB to 40 Gy. Collectively, our data suggest that dose escalation to spine metastases using SSIB can be safe and efficacious for patients, especially those with radioresistant disease. Further investigation is warranted to validate these findings.     

Active breathing control for patients receiving mediastinal radiation therapy for lymphoma: Impact on normal tissue dose

PurposeActive breathing control (ABC) is emerging as a tool to reduce heart and lung dose for lymphoma patients receiving mediastinal radiation therapy (RT). The objective of this study was to report our early institutional experience with this technique, with emphasis on quantifying the changes in normal tissue dose and exploring factors that could be used to select patients with the greatest benefit.Methods and materialsPatients receiving mediastinal involved-field RT (IFRT) for lymphoma were eligible. The ABC was performed using a moderate deep-inspiration breath-hold (mDIBH) technique. All patients were replanned with free-breathing (FB) computed tomographic data sets and comparisons of lung, cardiac, and female breast tissue doses were made between mDIBH and FB plans. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with improvement in mean lung and heart dose with mDIBH.ResultsForty-seven patients were analyzed; the majority (87.2%) had Hodgkin lymphoma. Median prescribed dose was 30 Gy (range, 20-36 Gy), with 78.7% of cases being treated with parallel-opposed beams. The use of mDIBH significantly improved average mean lung dose (FB: 11.0 Gy; mDIBH: 9.5 Gy; P < .0001), lung V20 (28% vs 22%; P < .0001), and mean heart dose (14.3 Gy vs 11.8 Gy; P = .003), but increased the mean breast dose (FB: 3.0 Gy; mDIBH 3.6 Gy; P = .0005). The magnitude of diaphragmatic excursion on the inhale scan was significantly associated with dosimetric improvement in both heart and lung dose with mDIBH.ConclusionsMediastinal IFRT for lymphoma delivered with mDIBH can significantly reduce lung and heart dose compared with FB, although not for all patients, and may increase breast dose in females. Its implementation is achievable in both adult and pediatric populations. Further work is necessary to better predict which patients benefit from this technique.     

Influence of MTHFR C677T Polymorphism on High-Dose Methotrexate-Related Toxicity in Patients With Primary Central Nervous System Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

BackgroundPrimary central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PCNS-DLBCL) is a relatively rare and aggressive neoplasm. High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is an effective regimen for the treatment of PCNS-DLBCL, but MTX–related toxicity remains a problem. The aim of this analysis study was to investigate the influence of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene C677T polymorphism on HD-MTX–related toxicity in patients with PCNS-DLBCL.Material/MethodsA prospective, observational study was conducted to analyze 148 MTX courses in 32 patients with PCNS-DLBCL.ResultsThe delayed MTX clearance was observed in 53 cycles (35.8%). The patients carrying the homozygous variant genotype had a higher risk of developing nephrotoxicity than those carrying the wild-type genotype (odds ratio [OR] 13.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-103.86; P = .002) or heterozygous variant genotype (OR 8.43; 95% CI, 2.31-30.70; P < .001). Significant differences were observed in hepatotoxicity (OR 9.33; 95% CI, 2.54-34.27; P < .001) and hematologic toxicity (OR 3.09; 95% CI, 1.18-8.07; P = .024) in addition to nephrotoxicity between the homozygous variant genotype and the wild-type genotype.ConclusionThe homozygous mutation of C to T at nucleotide 677 increases the risk on HD-MTX–related toxicity. The MTHFR C677T polymorphism can be used to predict HD-MTX–related toxicity for patients with PCNS-DLBCL.     

Acute toxicity of curative radiotherapy for intermediate- and high-risk localised prostate cancer in the EORTC trial 22991

IntroductionThis trial randomly assessed short-term adjuvant hormonal therapy added to radiotherapy (RT) for intermediate- and high-risk (UICC 1997 cT2a or cT1b-c with high PSA or Gleason score) localised prostate cancer. We report acute toxicity (CTCAE v2) assessed weekly during RT in relation to radiation parameters.Patients and methodsCentres selected the RT dose (70, 74 or 78 Gy) and RT technique. Statistical significance is at 0.05.ResultsOf 791 patients, 652 received 3D-CRT (70 Gy: 195, 74 Gy: 376, 78 Gy: 81) and 139 received IMRT (74 Gy: 28, 78 Gy: 111). During RT, grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were reported by7 (0.8%) and 50 (6.3%) patients, respectively. No grade 4 was reported. The risk of grade ?2 GI toxicity increased significantly with increasing D50%-rectum (p = 0.004) and that of grade ?2 GU toxicity correlated only to Dmax-bladder (p = 0.051). 3D-RT technique, increasing total dose and V95% >400 cc increased D50% and Dmax. One month after RT, only 14 patients (1.8%) reported grade 3 toxicity. AST did not seem to influence the risk of GU or GI acute toxicity.ConclusionRT up to 78 Gy was well tolerated. Dmax-bladder and D50%-rectum influenced the risk of grade ?2 GU toxicity and GI toxicity, respectively. Both were lower with IMRT but remained high for an irradiated RT volume > 400 cc for 3D-RT and for a dose of 78 Gy. Hormonal treatment did not influence acute toxicity.     

Combining Adjuvant Radiotherapy With Capecitabine in Chemotherapy-resistant Breast Cancer: Feasibility,Safety, and Toxicity

BackgroundIn a randomized trial (CREATE-X), patients with residual disease after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy had improved survival with the addition of adjuvant capecitabine. For patients who required radiotherapy (RT), capecitabine was given sequentially. Concurrent capecitabine-RT might be more efficacious. We hypothesized that the safety, feasibility, and toxicity of adjuvant capecitabine-RT would not be significantly different compared with adjuvant RT alone.Patient and MethodsWe retrospectively studied the data from patients with stage I-III invasive mammary carcinoma. Patients who had received capecitabine-RT were matched 1:3 with control patients who had received RT alone. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the predictors of radiation dermatitis.ResultsA total of 64 patients were enrolled, including 16 who had received capecitabine-RT and 48 who had received RT alone. The cohorts were balanced regarding the clinicopathologic factors. No treatment in either cohort resulted in hospitalization, short-term disability, or fatality. Most toxicities of capecitabine-RT were related to radiation dermatitis. Radiation dermatitis was not significantly different between the capecitabine-RT and RT cohort at either grade 2 (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-4.93; P = .63) or grade 3 (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 0.85-10.63; P = .09) or after multivariable analysis. However, the capecitabine-RT group was more likely to require modifications in the RT schedule, including treatment breaks or cancelled fractions (44% vs. 17%; OR, 3.89; 95% CI, 1.12-13.52; P = .03).ConclusionCapecitabine-RT appears to be safe in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with comparable toxicity to RT alone. It might require more treatment adjustments. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of this combination.     

Tolerance and efficacy of dose escalation using IMRT combined with chemotherapy for unresectable esophageal carcinoma: Long-term results of 51 patients

PurposeThe optimal dose in esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation (CRT) remains debated. We herein report on the dosimetric results, treatment-related toxicities and long-term outcomes of escalated dose up to 60 Gy delivered with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Materials and methodsAll consecutive patients that received a definitive CRT > 50 Gy for an unresectable esophageal carcinoma between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated for this study. Methodology included data base search, delayed toxicity grading, statistical testing including frequency analysis and survival analysis.ResultsA total of 51 patients were irradiated for a squamous cell carcinoma (86.3%) or an adenocarcinoma (13.7%). The median age at diagnosis was 62 years. Seven patients were simultaneously irradiated for another synchronous primary tumor. Forty-six patients (90.2%) received concurrent platin-based chemotherapy. The median prescribed doses were 60 Gy (54–66) and 48 Gy (44.8–56) delivered in 30 (27–35) fractions to the high and the low risks PTV respectively. The mean dose delivered to the lungs was 11.4 Gy (IC 95%: 4.8–19.8), the median volumes receiving up to 20 Gy (V20) and 30 Gy (V30) were 13.5% (3.0–46.0) and 4.6% (0.7–19.8) respectively. The mean dose delivered to the heart was 13.9 Gy (IC 95%:0.3–31.3) with a median V40 of 3.3% (0.0–25.0). One treatment-related death occurred within days after RT completion (neutropenic aplasia). After a median follow-up of 2.7 years (95% CI: 1.9–4.3), the 2-year overall survival, disease free survival and loco-regional control rates were 53.6%, 42.0% and 72.8% respectively. Delayed treatment related-toxicities ≤ grade 3 occurred among 25 patients (62.5%) mostly esophageal stricture (79.2%).ConclusionWe demonstrated in this study that dose escalation using IMRT in combination with platin-based chemotherapy as a definitive treatment for esophageal carcinoma is safe and results in higher loco-regional and control survival when compared to previously reported data.     

Reduced acute toxicity associated with the use of volumetric modulated arc therapy for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PurposeNovel techniques to deliver intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) have resulted in improved treatment efficiency and dosimetric endpoints. We aimed to compare acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity in patients treated for adenocarcinoma of the prostate (ACP) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).Methods and MaterialsA total of 122 (71 IMRT and 51 VMAT) ACP patients treated from 2004 to 2011 with definitive external beam radiation therapy were analyzed. Dose-volume histogram endpoints (V40, V65, V70, and V75 of the bladder and rectum) were collected for each patient. Median follow-up for patients treated with VMAT was 269 days versus IMRT was 1121 days. Acute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GI and GU toxicity scores, obtained during each weekly treatment check, were compared across cohorts. The univariate (UV) association between the covariates and outcomes was assessed and multivariable (MV) cumulative logit models were fit for each outcome.ResultsMedian patient age was 68 years and median prostate-specific antigen was 8.3. Both bladder and rectal V40, V65, V70, and V75 were all higher in the IMRT group versus the VMAT group (P < .05), which was likely influenced by larger planning target volumes in the IMRT group. The VMAT group had significantly lower rates of acute GU and acute GI CTCAE toxicity on UV association analysis. On MV analysis, VMAT remained independently associated with acute GU (odds ratio [OR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.44; P < .001) and GI (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07-0.41; P < .001) toxicity.ConclusionsVMAT appears to be independently associated with lower rates of acute GI and GU toxicity when compared with traditional IMRT. Further exploration of toxicity improvements associated with VMAT use in the definitive treatment of ACP is needed.