Prognostic Value of Initial Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients With Reperfused STEMI

ObjectivesThis study sought to establish the best definition of left ventricular adverse remodeling (LVAR) to predict outcomes and determine whether its assessment adds prognostic information to that obtained by early cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).BackgroundLVAR, usually defined as an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) is the main cause of heart failure after an ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction; however, the role of assessment of LVAR in predicting cardiovascular events remains controversial.MethodsPatients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction who received percutaneous coronary intervention within 6 h of symptom onset were included (n = 498). CMR was performed during hospitalization (6.2 ± 2.6 days) and after 6 months (6.1 ± 1.8 months). The optimal threshold values of the LVEDV increase and the LV ejection fraction decrease associated with the primary endpoint were ascertained. Primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, or ventricular arrhythmia.ResultsThe study was completed by 374 patients. Forty-nine patients presented the primary endpoint during follow-up (72.9 ± 42.8 months). Values that maximized the ability to identify patients with and without outcomes were a relative rise in LVEDV of 15% (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.1; p = 0.007) and a relative fall in LV ejection fraction of 3% (HR: 2.5; p = 0.001). However, the predictive model (using C-statistic analysis) failed to demonstrate that direct observation of LVAR at 6 months adds information to data from early CMR in predicting outcomes (C-statistic: 0.723 vs. 0.795).ConclusionsThe definition of LVAR that best predicts adverse cardiovascular events should consider both the increase in LVEDV and the reduction in LV ejection fraction. However, assessment of LVAR does not improve information provided by the early CMR.     

Prognostic Value of Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Function

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function.BackgroundPatients with ischemic cardiomyopathy are at risk from both myocardial ischemia and heart failure. Invasive testing is often used as the first-line investigation, and there is limited evidence as to whether stress testing can effectively provide risk stratification.MethodsIn this substudy of a multicenter registry from 13 U.S. centers, patients with reduced LV ejection fraction (<50%), referred for stress CMR for suspected myocardial ischemia, were included. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. The secondary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina or congestive heart failure, and unplanned late coronary artery bypass graft surgery.ResultsAmong 582 patients (mean age 62 ± 12 years, 34% women), 40% had a history of congestive heart failure, and the median LV ejection fraction was 39% (interquartile range: 28% to 45%). At median follow-up of 5.0 years, 97 patients had experienced the primary outcome, and 182 patients had experienced the secondary outcome. Patients with no CMR evidence of ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) experienced an annual primary outcome event rate of 1.1%. The presence of ischemia, LGE, or both was associated with higher event rates. In a multivariate model adjusted for clinical covariates, ischemia and LGE were independent predictors of the primary (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68 to 4.14; p < 0.001; and HR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.05 to 3.29; p = 0.03) and secondary (HR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.55 to 2.95; p < 0.001; and HR 1.70; 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.49; p = 0.007) outcomes. The addition of ischemia and LGE led to improved model discrimination for the primary outcome (change in C statistic from 0.715 to 0.765; p = 0.02). The presence and extent of ischemia were associated with higher rates of use of downstream coronary angiography, revascularization, and cost of care spent on ischemia testing.ConclusionsStress CMR was effective in risk-stratifying patients with reduced LV ejection fractions. (Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in the United States [SPINS] Study; NCT03192891)     

Empagliflozin Ameliorates Diastolic Dysfunction and Left Ventricular Fibrosis/Stiffness in Nondiabetic Heart Failure: A Multimodality Study

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of empagliflozin on diastolic function in a nondiabetic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) scenario and on the pathways causing diastolic dysfunction.BackgroundThis group demonstrated that empagliflozin ameliorates adverse cardiac remodeling, enhances myocardial energetics, and improves left ventricular systolic function in a nondiabetic porcine model of HF. Whether empagliflozin also improves diastolic function remains unknown. Hypothetically, empagliflozin would improve diastolic function in HF mediated both by a reduction in interstitial myocardial fibrosis and an improvement in cardiomyocyte stiffness (titin phosphorylation).MethodsHF was induced in nondiabetic pigs by 2-h balloon occlusion of proximal left anterior descending artery. Animals were randomized to empagliflozin or placebo for 2 months. Cardiac function was evaluated with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), 3-dimensional echocardiography, and invasive hemodynamics. In vitro relaxation of cardiomyocytes was studied in primary culture. Myocardial samples were obtained for histological and molecular evaluation. Myocardial metabolite consumption was analyzed by simultaneous blood sampling from coronary artery and coronary sinus.ResultsDespite similar initial ischemic myocardial injury, the empagliflozin group showed significantly improved diastolic function at 2 months, assessed by conventional echocardiography (higher e′ and color M-mode propagation velocity, lower E/e′ ratio, myocardial performance Tei index, isovolumic relaxation time, and left atrial size), echocardiography-derived strain imaging (strain imaging diastolic index, strain rate at isovolumic relaxation time and during early diastole, and untwisting), and CMR (higher peak filling rate, larger first filling volume). Invasive hemodynamics confirmed improved diastolic function with empagliflozin (better peak LV pressure rate of decay (–dP/dt), shorter Tau, lower end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (EDPVR), and reduced filling pressures). Empagliflozin reduced interstitial myocardial fibrosis at the imaging, histological and molecular level. Empagliflozin improved nitric oxide signaling (endothelial nitric oxide synthetase [eNOS] activity, nitric oxide [NO] availability, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) content, protein kinase G [PKG] signaling) and enhanced titin phosphorylation (which is responsible for cardiomyocyte stiffness). Indeed, isolated cardiomyocytes exhibited better relaxation in empagliflozin-treated animals. Myocardial consumption of glucose and ketone bodies negatively and positively correlated with diastolic function, respectively.ConclusionsEmpagliflozin ameliorates diastolic function in a nondiabetic HF porcine model, mitigates histological and molecular remodeling, and reduces both left ventricle and cardiomyocyte stiffness.     

Spironolactone in Patients With Heart Failure,Preserved Ejection Fraction,and Worsening Renal Function

BackgroundTreatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with spironolactone is associated with lower risk of heart failure hospitalization (HFH) but increased risk of worsening renal function (WRF). The prognostic implications of spironolactone-associated WRF in HFpEF patients are not well understood.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate the association between WRF, spironolactone treatment, and clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF.MethodsIn 1,767 patients randomized to spironolactone or placebo in the TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial)-Americas study, we examined the incidence of WRF (doubling of serum creatinine) by treatment assignment. Associations between incident WRF and subsequent risk for the primary study endpoint of cardiovascular (CV) death, HFH, or aborted cardiac arrest and key secondary outcomes, including CV death, HFH, and all-cause mortality according to treatment assignment, were examined in time-updated Cox proportional hazards models with an interaction term.ResultsWRF developed in 260 (14.7%) patients with higher rates in those assigned to spironolactone compared to placebo (17.8% vs. 11.6%; odds ratio: 1.66; 95% confidence interval: 1.27 to 2.17; p < 0.001). Regardless of treatment, incident WRF was associated with increased risk for the primary endpoint (hazard ratio: 2.04; 95% confidence interval: 1.52 to 2.72; p < 0.001) after multivariable adjustment. Although there was no statistical interaction between treatment assignment and WRF regarding the primary endpoint (interaction p = 0.11), spironolactone-associated WRF was associated with lower risk of CV death (interaction p = 0.003) and all-cause mortality (interaction p = 0.001) compared with placebo-associated WRF.ConclusionsAmong HFpEF patients enrolled in TOPCAT-Americas, spironolactone increased risk of WRF compared with placebo. Rates of CV death were lower with spironolactone in both patients with and without WRF.     

3-Dimensional Versus 2-Dimensional STE for Right Ventricular Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients With End-Stage Heart Failure

BackgroundLongitudinal strain of the right ventricular (RV) free wall (RVFWLS) assessed by 2-dimensional (2D) speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) has been recently demonstrated to correlate with the extent of RV myocardial fibrosis (MF). However, the value of 3-dimensional (3D) STE–derived strain parameters in predicting RV MF has not been investigated in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF).ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine which RV strain parameter assessed by 2D-STE and 3D-STE was the most reliable parameter for predicting RV MF in patients with end-stage HF against histological confirmation of MF.MethodsA total of 105 consecutive patients with end-stage HF undergoing heart transplantation were enrolled in our study. The conventional RV function parameters, 2D-RVFWLS, and 3D-RVFWLS were obtained in these patients. The degree of MF was quantified by Masson trichrome staining in RV myocardial samples. The study population was divided into 3 groups according to the degree of MF on histology.ResultsPatients with severe MF had lower 3D-RVFWLS, 2D-RVFWLS, and conventional parameters of RV function compared with those with mild and moderate MF. RV MF strongly correlated with 3D-RVFWLS (r = ?0.72; p < 0.001), modestly with 2D-RVFWLS (r = ?0.53; p < 0.001), and weakly with conventional RV function parameters (r = ?0.21 to ?0.49; p < 0.01). 3D-RVFWLS correlated best with the degree of MF (r = ?0.72 vs. ?0.21 to ?0.53; p < 0.05) compared with 2D-RVFWLS and conventional RV function parameters. 3D-RVFWLS had the highest accuracy for detecting severe MF (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.90 vs. 0.24–0.80; p < 0.05) compared with 2D-RVFWLS and conventional RV parameters. The model with 3D-RVFWLS (R² = 0.63; p < 0.001) was better in predicting the degree of RV MF than that with 2D-RVFWLS (R² = 0.54; p < 0.001).Conclusions3D-RVFWLS may be the most robust echocardiographic measure for predicting the extent of RV MF in patients with end-stage HF.     

Reverse Remodeling Assessed by Left Atrial and Ventricular Strain Reflects Treatment Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan

BackgroundThe left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) and left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) are considered as sensitive and reliable markers of cardiac remodeling and function. However, their temporal changes during optimal management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are unknown.ObjectivesThis study investigated the time trajectories of the LARS and LVGLS in patients with HFrEF treated with angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors, and assessed whether the LARS and LVGLS could define left heart reverse remodeling (LHRR) and reflect the treatment response and prognosis.MethodsUsing a retrospective cohort of patients with HFrEF prescribed sacubitril/valsartan, we assessed the time trajectories of the LVGLS and LARS in 409 patients (1,258 echocardiograms), and investigated their association with the occurrence of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), after the determination of LHRR, during a median follow-up of 27.1 (IQR: 18.3-36.3) months.ResultsAmong patients with HFrEF prescribed sacubitril/valsartan, both the LVGLS and LARS improved over time. The improvements in the LVGLS and LARS were prominent within 6 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment: the LVGLS improved from 10.2% (IQR: 7.9%-12.7%) to 13.9% (IQR: 10.5%-16.3%) (P < 0.001), and the LARS improved from 11.4% (IQR: 8.4%-15.6%) to 15.9% (IQR: 11.5%-21.4%) (P < 0.001). These improvements were larger among patients who did not experience the study outcome than in patients with events. Improvement in the LVGLS to ≥13% and LARS to ≥12.5% (ie, complete LHRR) was significantly associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death and HHF, and this association was stronger than that of changes in other conventional echocardiographic parameters.ConclusionsIn patients with HFrEF treated with sacubitril/valsartan, the LVGLS and LARS were improved, typically within 6 months of treatment. Complete LHRR, defined by improvement in the LVGLS and LARS, can be an indicator of treatment response and prognosis.     

Pericardial Fat and the Risk of Heart Failure

BackgroundObesity is a well-established risk factor for heart failure (HF). However, implications of pericardial fat on incident HF is unclear.ObjectivesThis study sought to examine the association between pericardial fat volume (PFV) and newly diagnosed HF.MethodsThis study ascertained PFV using cardiac computed tomography in 6,785 participants (3,584 women and 3,201 men) without pre-existing cardiovascular disease from the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate PFV as continuous and dichotomous variable, maximizing the J-statistic: (Sensitivity + Specificity – 1).ResultsIn 90,686 person-years (median: 15.7 years; interquartile range: 11.7 to 16.5 years), 385 participants (5.7%; 164 women and 221 men) developed newly diagnosed HF. PFV was lower in women than in men (69 ± 33 cm³ vs. 92 ± 47 cm³; p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, every 1-SD (42 cm³) increase in PFV was associated with a higher risk of HF in women (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21 to 1.71; p < 0.001) than in men (HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.27; p = 0.03) (interaction p = 0.01). High PFV (≥70 cm³ in women; ≥120 cm³ in men) conferred a 2-fold greater risk of HF in women (HR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.48 to 2.87; p < 0.001) and a 53% higher risk in men (HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.07; p = 0.006). In sex-stratified analyses, greater risk of HF remained robust with additional adjustment for anthropometric indicators of obesity (p ≤ 0.008), abdominal subcutaneous or visceral fat (p ≤ 0.03) or biomarkers of inflammation and hemodynamic stress (p < 0.001) and was similar among Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, and Chinese (interaction p = 0.24). Elevated PFV predominantly augmented the risk of HF with preserved ejection fraction (p < 0.001) rather than reduced ejection fraction (p = 0.31).ConclusionsIn this large, community-based, ethnically diverse, prospective cohort study, pericardial fat was associated with an increased risk of HF, particularly HF with preserved ejection fraction, in women and men.     

Improving the Characterization of Stage A and B Heart Failure by Adding Global Longitudinal Strain

BackgroundCurrent guidelines distinguish stage B heart failure (SBHF) (asymptomatic left ventricular [LV] dysfunction) from stage A heart failure (SAHF) (asymptomatic with heart failure [HF] risk factors) on the basis of myocardial infarction, LV remodeling (hypertrophy or reduced ejection fraction [EF]) or valvular disease. However, subclinical HF with preserved EF may not be identified with these criteria.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the prediction of incident HF with global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with SAHF and SBHF.MethodsThe authors analyzed echocardiograms (including GLS) in 447 patients (age 65 ± 11 years; 77% male) enrolled in a prospective study of HF in individuals at risk of incident HF, with normal or mildly impaired EF (≥40%). Long-term follow-up was obtained via data linkage. Analysis was performed using a competing risks model.ResultsAfter a median of 9 years of follow-up, 50 (10%) of the 447 patients had new HF admissions, and 87 (18%) died. In multivariable analysis, all imaging variables were independent predictors of HF admissions, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HR: 0.97 [95% CI: 0.94-0.99]), LV mass index (HR: 1.01 [95% CI: 1.00-1.02]), left atrial volume index (HR: 1.02 [95% CI: 1.00-1.05]), and E/e′ (HR: 1.05 [95% CI: 1.01-1.24]), incremental to clinical variables (age and Charlson comorbidity score). However, the addition of GLS provided value incremental to both clinical and other echocardiographic parameters (P = 0.004). Impaired GLS (<18%) (HR: 4.09 [95% CI: 1.87-8.92]) was independent and incremental to all clinical and other echocardiographic variables in predicting HF, and impaired LVEF, left ventricular hypertrophy, left atrial enlargement, high E/e′, or SBHF were not predictive.ConclusionsThe inclusion of GLS as a criterion for SBHF would add independent and incremental information to standard markers of SBHF for the prediction of subsequent HF admissions.     

Moderate Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

BackgroundThe study investigators previously reported that moderate aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HFrEF). However, the respective contribution of moderate AS versus HFrEF to the outcomes of these patients is unknown.ObjectivesThis study sought to determine the impact of moderate AS on outcomes in patients with HFrEF.MethodsThe study included 262 patients with moderate AS (aortic valve area >1.0 and <1.5 cm²; and peak aortic jet velocity >2 and <4 m/s, at rest or after dobutamine stress echocardiography) and HFrEF (LVEF <50%). These patients were matched 1:1 for sex, age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, New York Heart Association functional class III to IV, presence of diabetes, LVEF, and body mass index with patients with HFrEF but no AS (i.e., peak aortic jet velocity <2 m/s). The endpoints were all-cause mortality and the composite of death and HF hospitalization.ResultsA total of 262 patients with HFrEF and moderate AS were matched with 262 patients with HFrEF and no AS. Mean follow-up was 2.9 ± 2.2 years. In the moderate AS group, mean aortic valve area was 1.2 ± 0.2 cm², and mean gradient was 14.5 ± 4.7 mm Hg. Moderate AS was associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.08 to 4.31; p < 0.0001) and of the composite of HF hospitalization and mortality (HR: 2.34; 95% CI: 1. 72 to 3.21; p < 0.0001). In the moderate AS group, aortic valve replacement (AVR) performed in 44 patients at a median follow-up time of 10.9 ± 16 months during follow-up was associated with improved survival (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.98; p = 0.04). Notably, surgical AVR was not significantly associated with improved survival (p = 0.92), whereas transcatheter AVR was (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.18 to 1.00; p = 0.05).ConclusionsIn this series of patients with HFrEF, moderate AS was associated with a marked incremental risk of mortality. AVR, and especially transcatheter AVR during follow-up, was associated with improved survival in patients with HFrEF and moderate AS. These findings provide support to the realization of a randomized trial to assess the effect of early transcatheter AVR in patients with HFrEF and moderate AS.     

Relation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function to Global Fibrosis Burden: Implications for Heart Failure Risk Stratification

BackgroundLeft ventricular (LV) diastolic function is primarily assessed by means of echocardiography, which has limited utility in detecting fibrosis. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) readily detects and quantifies fibrosis.ObjectivesIn this study, the authors sought to determine the association of LV diastolic function by echocardiography with CMR-determined global fibrosis burden and the incremental value of fibrosis with diastolic function grade in prediction of total mortality and heart failure hospitalizations.MethodsA total of 549 patients underwent comprehensive echocardiography and CMR within 30 days. Echocardiography was used to assess LV diastolic function, and CMR was used to determine LV volumes, mass, ejection fraction, replacement fibrosis, and percentage extracellular volume fraction (ECV).ResultsNormal diastolic function was present in 142 patients; the rest had diastolic dysfunction grades I to III, except for 18 (3.3%) with indeterminate results. The event rate was higher in patients with diastolic dysfunction compared with patients with normal diastolic function (33.4% vs 15.5; P < 0.001). The model including LV diastolic function grades II and III predicted composite outcome (C-statistic: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.67-0.76), which increased by adding global fibrosis burden (C-statistic: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.70-0.78; P = 0.02). For heart failure hospitalizations, the competing risk model with LV diastolic function grades II and III was good (C-statistic: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.74-0.83) and increased significantly with the addition of global fibrosis burden (C-statistic: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.76-0.85; P = 0.03).ConclusionsHigher grades of diastolic dysfunction are seen in patients with replacement fibrosis and increased ECV. Fibrosis burden as determined with the use of CMR provides incremental prognostic information to echocardiographic evaluation of LV diastolic function.     

Clonal Hematopoiesis and Risk of Progression of Heart Failure With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

BackgroundClonal hematopoiesis driven by somatic mutations in hematopoietic cells, frequently called clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), has been associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in population-based studies and in patients with ischemic heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Yet, the impact of CHIP on HF progression, including nonischemic etiology, is unknown.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the clinical impact of clonal hematopoiesis on HF progression irrespective of its etiology.MethodsThe study cohort comprised 62 patients with HF and LVEF <45% (age 74 ± 7 years, 74% men, 52% nonischemic, and LVEF 30 ± 8%). Deep sequencing was used to detect CHIP mutations with a variant allelic fraction >2% in 54 genes. Patients were followed for at least 3.5 years for various adverse events including death, HF-related death, and HF hospitalization.ResultsCHIP mutations were detected in 24 (38.7%) patients, without significant differences in all-cause mortality (p = 0.151). After adjusting for risk factors, patients with mutations in either DNA methyltransferase 3 alpha (DNMT3A) or Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2 (TET2) exhibited accelerated HF progression in terms of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31 to 5.92; p = 0.008), death or HF hospitalization (HR: 3.84; 95% CI: 1.84 to 8.04; p < 0.001) and HF-related death or HF hospitalization (HR: 4.41; 95% CI: 2.15 to 9.03; p < 0.001). In single gene-specific analyses, somatic mutations in DNMT3A or TET2 retained prognostic significance with regard to HF-related death or HF hospitalization (HR: 4.50; 95% CI: 2.07 to 9.74; p < 0.001, for DNMT3A mutations; HR: 3.18; 95% CI: 1.52 to 6.66; p = 0.002, for TET2 mutations). This association remained significant irrespective of ischemic/nonischemic etiology.ConclusionsSomatic mutations that drive clonal hematopoiesis are common among HF patients with reduced LVEF and are associated with accelerated HF progression regardless of etiology.     

Prior Heart Failure Hospitalization,Clinical Outcomes,and Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Valsartan in HFpEF

BackgroundThe period shortly after hospitalization for heart failure (HF) represents a high-risk window for recurrent clinical events, including rehospitalization or death.ObjectivesThis study sought to determine whether the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan varies in relation to the proximity to hospitalization for HF among patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).MethodsIn this post hoc analysis of PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI [Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor] with ARB [Angiotensin Receptor Blocker] Global Outcomes in HFpEF), we assessed the risk of clinical events and response to sacubitril/valsartan in relation to time from last HF hospitalization among patients with HFpEF (≥45%). The primary outcome was composite total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death, analyzed by using a semiparametric proportional rates method, stratified by geographic region.ResultsOf 4,796 validly randomized patients in PARAGON-HF, 622 (13%) were screened during hospitalization or within 30 days of prior hospitalization, 555 (12%) within 31 to 90 days, 435 (9%) within 91 to 180 days, and 694 (14%) after 180 days; 2,490 (52%) were never previously hospitalized. Over a median follow-up of 35 months, risk of total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death was inversely and nonlinearly associated with timing from prior HF hospitalization (p < 0.001). There was a gradient in relative risk reduction in primary events with sacubitril/valsartan from patients hospitalized within 30 days (rate ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.53 to 0.99) to patients never hospitalized (rate ratio: 1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.80 to 1.24; trend in relative risk reduction: p_interaction = 0.15). With valsartan alone, the rate of total primary events was 26.7 (≤30 days), 24.2 (31 to 90 days), 20.7 (91 to 180 days), 15.7 (>180 days), and 7.9 (not previously hospitalized) per 100 patient-years. Compared with valsartan, absolute risk reductions with sacubitril/valsartan were more prominent in patients enrolled early after hospitalization: 6.4% (≤30 days), 4.6% (31 to 90 days), and 3.4% (91 to 180 days), whereas no risk reduction was observed in patients screened >180 days or who were never hospitalized (trend in absolute risk reduction: p_interaction = 0.050).ConclusionsRecent hospitalization for HFpEF identifies patients at high risk for near-term clinical progression. In the PARAGON-HF trial, the relative and absolute benefits of sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan in HFpEF appear to be amplified when initiated in the high-risk window after hospitalization and warrant prospective validation. (PARAGON-HF; NCT01920711)     

Inflammation in Heart Failure: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

It has long been observed that heart failure (HF) is associated with measures of systemic inflammation. In recent years, there have been significant advancements in our understanding of how inflammation contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of HF. However, although numerous studies have validated the association between measures of inflammation and HF severity and prognosis, clinical trials of anti-inflammatory therapies have proven mostly unsuccessful. On this backdrop emerges the yet unmet goal of targeting precise phenotypes within the syndrome of HF; if such precise definitions can be realized, and with better understanding of the roles played by specific inflammatory mediators, the expectation is that targeted anti-inflammatory therapies may improve prognosis in patients whose HF is driven by inflammatory pathobiology. Here, the authors describe mechanistic links between inflammation and HF, discuss traditional and novel inflammatory biomarkers, and summarize the latest evidence from clinical trials of anti-inflammatory therapies.     

Nuclear Imaging of the Cardiac Sympathetic Nervous System: A Disease-Specific Interpretation in Heart Failure

Abnormalities in the cardiac sympathetic nervous system have been documented in various heart diseases and have been directly implicated in their pathogenesis and disease progression. Noninvasive techniques using single-photon-emitting radiotracers for planar scintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography, and positron-emitting tracers for positron emissions tomography, have been used to characterize the cardiac sympathetic nervous system with norepinephrine analogs [¹²³I]meta-iodobenzylguanidine for planar and single-photon emission computed tomography imaging and [¹¹C]meta-hydroxyephedrine for positron emissions tomography. Their usefulness in prognostication and risk stratification for cardiac events has been demonstrated. This review bridges basic and clinical research and focuses on applying an understanding of tracer kinetics and neuronal biology, to aid in the interpretation of nuclear imaging of cardiac sympathetic innervation.     

Incidence and Outcomes of Pneumonia in Patients With Heart Failure

BackgroundThe incidence of pneumonia and subsequent outcomes has not been compared in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).ObjectivesThis study aimed to examine the rate and impact of pneumonia in the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) and PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction) trials.MethodsThe authors analyzed the incidence of investigator-reported pneumonia and the rates of HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death before and after the occurrence of pneumonia, and estimated risk after the first occurrence of pneumonia in unadjusted and adjusted analyses (the latter including N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide).ResultsIn PARADIGM-HF, 528 patients (6.3%) developed pneumonia after randomization, giving an incidence rate of 29 (95% CI: 27 to 32) per 1,000 patient-years. In PARAGON-HF, 510 patients (10.6%) developed pneumonia, giving an incidence rate of 39 (95% CI: 36 to 42) per 1,000 patient-years. The subsequent risk of all trial outcomes was elevated after the occurrence of pneumonia. In PARADIGM-HF, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the risk of death from any cause was 4.34 (95% CI: 3.73 to 5.05). The corresponding adjusted HR in PARAGON-HF was 3.76 (95% CI: 3.09 to 4.58).ConclusionsThe incidence of pneumonia was high in patients with HF, especially HFpEF, at around 3 times the expected rate. A first episode of pneumonia was associated with 4-fold higher mortality. (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure [PARADIGM-HF], NCT01035255; Prospective Comparison of ARNI [Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibitor] With ARB [Angiotensin Receptor Blocker] Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PARAGON-HF], NCT01920711)     

Left Atrial Strain for Assessment of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function: Focus on Populations With Normal LVEF

Left atrial (LA) strain has emerged as a useful parameter for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function and the estimation of LV filling pressures. Some have advocated using LA strain by itself, mainly reservoir strain, as a single stand-alone measurement for this objective. Recent data indicate several challenges for this application in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) because of the wide range for normal values and the load dependency of LA strain. Both findings can result in reduced left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) values in normal subjects that overlap those seen in patients with diastolic dysfunction. LARS for the estimation of LV filling pressures is most accurate in patients with depressed LVEF. It is less accurate in patients with normal ejection fraction. In this group of patients, LARS <18% has high specificity for increased LV filling pressures. There are promising data showing the association of LARS with outcome events in patients with normal ejection fraction, and additional data are needed to confirm that it provides incremental information over clinical and other echocardiographic measurements.     

Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Microvascular Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

BackgroundThe pathophysiological and clinical significance of microvascular dysfunction (MVD) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains uncertain.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to use cardiovascular magnetic resonance to: 1) quantify coronary microvascular function; 2) examine the relationship between perfusion and fibrosis; and 3) evaluate the impact of MVD and fibrosis on long-term clinical outcomes.MethodsIn a prospective, observational study, patients with HFpEF and control subjects underwent multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (comprising assessment of left ventricular volumetry, perfusion, and fibrosis [focal by late gadolinium enhancement and diffuse by extracellular volume]). The primary endpoint was the composite of death or hospitalization with heart failure.ResultsOne hundred and one patients with HFpEF (mean age 73 ± 9 years, mean ejection fraction 56% ± 5%) and 43 control subjects (mean age 73 ± 5 years, mean ejection fraction 58% ± 5%) were studied. Myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) was lower in patients with HFpEF versus control subjects (1.74 ± 0.76 vs 2.22 ± 0.76; P = 0.001). MVD (defined as MPR <2.0) was present in 70% of patients with HFpEF (vs 48% of control subjects; P = 0.014). There was no significant linear correlation between MPR and diffuse fibrosis (r = ?0.10; P = 0.473) and no difference in MPR between those with and without focal fibrosis (mean difference ?0.03; 95% CI: ?0.37 to 0.30). In the HFpEF group, during median follow-up of 3.1 years, there were 45 composite events. MPR was independently predictive of clinical outcome following adjustment for clinical, blood, and imaging parameters (1 SD increase: HR: 0.673 [95% CI: 0.463 to 0.978; P = 0.038]; HR: 0.694 [95% CI: 0.491 to 0.982; P = 0.039]; and HR: 0.690 [95% CI: 0.489 to 0.973; P = 0.034], respectively).ConclusionsMVD is highly prevalent among patients with HFpEF and is an independent predictor of prognosis. The lack of correlation between MVD and fibrosis may challenge the assertion of a direct causal link between these entities. (Developing Imaging and Plasma Biomarkers in Describing Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [DIAMONDHFpEF]; NCT03050593)     

Albuminuria and Heart Failure: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Although chronic kidney disease is characterized by low glomerular filtration rate (GFR) or albuminuria, estimated GFR (eGFR) is more widely utilized as a marker of risk profile in cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure (HF). The presence and magnitude of albuminuria confers a strong prognostic association in forecasting risk of incident HF as well as its progression, irrespective of eGFR. Despite the high prevalence of albuminuria in HF, whether it adds incremental prognostic information in clinical practice and serves as an independent risk marker, and whether there are any therapeutic implications of assessing albuminuria in patients with HF is less well-established. In this narrative review, we assess the potential role of albuminuria in risk profiling for development and progression of HF, strengths and limitations of utilizing albuminuria as a risk marker, its ability to serve in HF risk prediction models, and the implications of adopting albuminuria as an effective parameter in cardiovascular trials and practice.     

Myocardial Angiotensin Metabolism in End-Stage Heart Failure

BackgroundThe myocardium exhibits an adaptive tissue-specific renin-angiotensin system (RAS), and local dysbalance may circumvent the desired effects of pharmacologic RAS inhibition, a mainstay of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) therapy.ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate human myocardial tissue RAS regulation of the failing heart in the light of current therapy.MethodsFifty-two end-stage HFrEF patients undergoing heart transplantation (no RAS inhibitor: n = 9; angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor: n = 28; angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]: n = 8; angiotensin receptor neprilysin-inhibitor [ARNi]: n = 7) were enrolled. Myocardial angiotensin metabolites and enzymatic activities involved in the metabolism of the key angiotensin peptides angiotensin 1-8 (AngII) and Ang1-7 were determined in left ventricular samples by mass spectrometry. Circulating angiotensin concentrations were assessed for a subgroup of patients.ResultsAngII and Ang2-8 (AngIII) were the dominant peptides in the failing heart, while other metabolites, especially Ang1-7, were below the detection limit. Patients receiving an ARB component (i.e., ARB or ARNi) had significantly higher levels of cardiac AngII and AngIII (AngII: 242 [interquartile range (IQR): 145.7 to 409.9] fmol/g vs 63.0 [IQR: 19.9 to 124.1] fmol/g; p < 0.001; and AngIII: 87.4 [IQR: 46.5 to 165.3] fmol/g vs 23.0 [IQR: <5.0 to 59.3] fmol/g; p = 0.002). Myocardial AngII concentrations were strongly related to circulating AngII levels. Myocardial RAS enzyme regulation was independent from the class of RAS inhibitor used, particularly, a comparable myocardial neprilysin activity was observed for patients with or without ARNi. Tissue chymase, but not ACE, is the main enzyme for cardiac AngII generation, whereas AngII is metabolized to Ang1-7 by prolyl carboxypeptidase but not to ACE2. There was no trace of cardiac ACE2 activity.ConclusionsThe failing heart contains considerable levels of classical RAS metabolites, whereas AngIII might be an unrecognized mediator of detrimental effects on cardiovascular structure. The results underline the importance of pharmacologic interventions reducing circulating AngII actions, yet offer room for cardiac tissue-specific RAS drugs aiming to limit myocardial AngII/AngIII peptide accumulation and actions.     

LA Mechanics in Decompensated Heart Failure: Insights From Strain Echocardiography With Invasive Hemodynamics

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the effect of congestion and decongestive therapy on left atrial (LA) mechanics and to determine the relationship between LA improvement after decongestive therapy and clinical outcome in immediate or chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).BackgroundLA mechanics are affected by volume/pressure overload in decompensated HFrEF.MethodsA total of 31 patients with HFrEF and immediate heart failure (age 64 ± 15 years, 74% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 20 ± 12%) underwent serial echocardiography during decongestive therapy with simultaneous hemodynamic monitoring. LA function was assessed by strain (rate) imaging. Patients were re-evaluated 6 weeks after discharge and prospectively followed up for the composite endpoint of heart failure readmission and all-cause mortality.ResultsLA reservoir function was markedly reduced at baseline and improved with decongestion (peak atrial longitudinal strain from 6.4 ± 2.2% to 8.8 ± 3.0% and strain rate from 0.29 ± 0.11 s^–1 to 0.38 ± 0.13 s^–1), independent of changes in left ventricular global longitudinal strain, LA end-diastolic volume, and mitral regurgitation severity (p < 0.001). Both measures continued to rise at 6 weeks (up to 13.4 ± 6.1% and 0.50 ± 0.19 s^–1, respectively; p < 0.001). LA pump strain rate only increased 6 weeks after discharge (–0.25 ± 0.12 s^–1 to –0.55 ± 0.29 s^–1; p < 0.010). Changes in LA mechanics correlated with changes in wedge pressure (r = –0.61; p < 0.001). Lower peak atrial longitudinal strain values after decongestion were associated with increased risk for the composite endpoint of heart failure and mortality (p < 0.019).ConclusionsLA reservoir and booster function, while severely impaired during immediate decompensation, significantly improve during and after decongestive therapy. Poor LA reservoir function after decongestion is associated with worse outcome.