Aging-related alterations in human upper esophageal sphincter function

Recent improvements in manometric catheters have made measurement of pharyngeal (P) and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) swallowing mechanics more reliable. Few studies have attempted to evaluate the effect of normal aging on P and UES mechanics. Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter dynamics were studied in 10 healthy elderly adults (age greater than 60; range 62-79 yr) and 10 younger adults (age less than 60; range 24-59 yr). A solid-state intraluminal transducer system was used with a proximal unidirectional Konigsberg microtransducer and a circumferential (sphincter) transducer located 5 cm distally. Mean resting UES pressure was significantly (p less than 0.05) lower in the elderly than in the younger subjects (52 +/- 5 vs 72 +/- 6 (SE)) mm Hg. A significant inverse relation (R = -0.54; p less than 0.02) was found between age and resting UES pressure. Time from peak of pharyngeal contraction to UES nadir was significantly (p less than 0.05) shortened in the healthy elderly vs younger controls (10 +/- 30 vs 90 +/- 20 ms) during dry swallows. Our studies indicate that aging is associated with lower resting UES pressure and delayed UES relaxation, relative to the pharyngeal peak.     

Esophageal manometry: a comparison of findings in younger and older patients

Objective: We sought to determine the utility of esophageal manometry in an older patient population.
Methods: Consecutively performed manometry studies (470) were reviewed and two groups were chosen for the study, those ≥ 75 yr of age (66 patients) and those ≤ 50 years (122 patients). Symptoms, manometric findings (lower esophageal sphincter [LES], esophageal body, upper esophageal sphincter [UES]) and diagnoses were compared between the groups.
Results: Dysphagia was more common (60.6% vs 25.4%), and chest pain was less common (17.9 vs 26.2%) in older patients. In the entire group, there were no differences in LES parameters. Older patients with achalasia had lower LES residual pressures after deglutition (2.7 vs 12.0 mm Hg), but had similar resting pressures (31.4 vs 35.2 mm Hg) compared with younger achalasia patients. Duration and amplitude of peristalsis were similar in both groups, whereas peristaltic sequences were more likely to be simultaneous in the older group (15% vs 4%). The UES had a lower resting pressure in the older patients (49.6 vs 77.6 mm Hg) and a higher residual pressure (2.0 vs −2.7 mm Hg). The older patients were less likely to have normal motility (30.3% vs 44.3%) and were more likely to have achalasia (15.2% vs 4.1%) or diffuse esophageal spasm (16.6% vs 5.0%). When only patients with dysphagia were analyzed, achalasia was still more likely in the older group (20.0% vs 12.9%).
Conclusions: When older patients present with dysphagia, esophageal manometry frequently yields a diagnosis to help explain their symptoms.     

Manometry and impedance characteristics of achalasia. Facts and myths

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is defined manometrically by an aperistaltic esophagus. Variations in the manometric findings occur in achalasia suggesting that all manometric features should not be required to diagnose achalasia. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry (MII-EM) allows both a functional and a manometric evaluation of esophageal motility and identifies chronic fluid retention. AIM: To compare manometric and MII characteristics in patients with achalasia. METHODS: Retrospective review of 73 MII-EM tracings from patients with achalasia done in our laboratory between October 2001 and December 2004 (38 females; mean age=53.5 y). Patients with previous esophageal interventions were excluded. Manometric and MII characteristics were identified and compared during 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows. Patients were also divided into 2 groups: vigorous achalasia (VA) and achalasia. RESULTS: Twenty-two of the seventy-one (31%) achalasia patients had a hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) for the 71 patients with achalasia was 37.9+/-21.2 mm Hg compared with 27.3+/-9.3 mm Hg (P<0.05) in the 73 patients with normal motility. The mean LESP in patients with achalasia was 36+/-20.3 mm Hg compared with 47+/-23.2 mm Hg (P<0.05) in patients with VA. Elevated intraesophageal pressure (IEP) was noted in 45/73 (61.6%). The mean LESP in this group was 41.1+/-22.9 mm Hg compared with 32.5+/-17 mm Hg (P<0.05) with normal IEP. The mean baseline impedance for achalasia was 801+/-732 compared with 1265.2+/-829.5 Omega (P<0.05) for the VA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with achalasia have elevated IEP, elevated LES residual pressure, normal LES pressure, and low baseline impedance. All manometric features should not be required to diagnose achalasia. Patients with an elevated IEP are likely to have an elevated LES pressure and LES residual pressure. Low MII values identify chronic fluid retention and helps confirm the diagnosis.     

Peppermint oil improves the manometric findings in diffuse esophageal spasm.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) is an uncommon condition that results in simultaneous esophageal contractions. Current medical treatment of DES is frequently unsatisfactory. We hypothesized that, as a smooth muscle relaxant, peppermint oil may improve the manometric findings in DES. STUDY: Eight consecutive patients with chest pain or dysphagia and who were found to have DES were enrolled during their diagnostic esophageal manometry. An eight-channel perfusion manometry system was used. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure and contractions of the esophageal body after 10 wet swallows were assessed before and 10 minutes after the ingestion of a solution containing five drops of peppermint oil in 10 mL of water. Each swallow was assessed for duration (seconds), amplitude (mm Hg), and proportion of simultaneous and multiphasic esophageal contractions. RESULTS: Lower esophageal sphincter pressures and contractile pressures and durations in both the upper and lower esophagus were no different before and after the peppermint oil. Peppermint oil completely eliminated simultaneous esophageal contractions in all patients (p < 0.01). The number of multiphasic, spontaneous, and missed contractions also improved. Because normal esophageal contractions are characteristically uniform in appearance, variability of esophageal contractions was compared before and after treatment. The variability of amplitude improved from 33.4 +/- 36.7 to 24.9 +/- 11.0 mm Hg (p < 0.05) after the peppermint oil. The variability for duration improved from 2.02 +/- 1.80 to 1.36 +/- 0.72 seconds (p < 0.01). Two of the eight patients had chest pain that resolved after the peppermint oil. CONCLUSIONS: This data demonstrates that peppermint oil improves the manometric features of DES.     

Intraesophageal pressure during esophageal speech in laryngectomized patients rehabilitated or no rehabilitated for oral communication

BACKGROUND: After laryngectomy for treatment of pharyngeal/laryngeal carcinomas the patients may be rehabilitated, for oral communication, with the esophageal speech. AIM: To study the intra-esophageal pressure during the esophageal speech. PATIENTS AND METHODS: It was measured the intra-esophageal pressure in 25 laryngectomized patients aged 40 to 70 years (median 57 years), 10 rehabilitated with esophageal speech and 15 unable to do so. The manometric method with continuous perfusion was used. The esophageal pressures was measured 3 to 5 cm below the upper esophageal sphincter when the patients tried to speak the vowel "a". Sometimes the air swallowed went to the stomach, with a peristaltic or simultaneous contraction in the esophageal body. RESULTS: During the attempt of esophageal speech the intra-esophageal pressure was higher in patients able to have esophageal speech (26.4 +/- 10.1 mm Hg, mean +/- SD) than in patients unable to do so (13.7 +/- 7.2 mm Hg). The esophageal contraction after a swallow of air was also higher in patients with esophageal speech (45.3 +/- 8.6 mm Hg) than in patients unable to do so (33.8 +/- 13.1 mm Hg). CONCLUSION: Laryngectomized patients rehabilitated with esophageal speech has a higher intra-esophageal pressure during speech than patients unable to do so, what may be consequence of the capacity to retain air inside the esophagus.     

Comparison of esophageal motility impairment caused by Chagas' disease in two age groups

BACKGROUND: Chagas' disease and the aging process cause loss of neurons of the esophageal myenteric plexus. AIM: To evaluate the esophageal motility impairment caused by Chagas' disease in two age groups. Our hypothesis was that the aging process may cause further esophageal motility impairment in patients with Chagas' disease. METHODS: We studied the esophageal motility of 30 patients with Chagas' disease and dysphagia, with esophageal retention of barium sulfate and an esophageal diameter within the normal range. Fifteen were 34 to 59 years old (younger group, median 51 years) and 15 were 61 to 77 years old (older group, median 66 years). As a control group we studied 15 subjects aged 33 to 58 years (median 42 years) and 7 subjects aged 61 to 73 years (median 66 years). The esophageal contractions were measured by the manometric method with continuous perfusion after five swallows of a 5 mL bolus of water at 2, 7, 12 and 17 cm below the upper esophageal sphincter. RESULTS: Patients with Chagas' disease had lower amplitude of contractions and fewer peristaltic, more simultaneous, and more non-conducted contractions than controls. Older patients with Chagas' disease had lower amplitude of contractions in the distal esophagus (mean +/- SE: 30.8 +/- 4.3 mm Hg) than younger patients (51.9 +/- 8.6 mm Hg). From 12 to 17 cm, older patients had more non-conducted (41%) and fewer peristaltic (8%) contractions than younger patients (non-conducted: 16%, peristaltic: 21%). CONCLUSION: Older patients with Chagas' disease with clinical and radiological examinations similar to those of younger patients had motility alterations suggesting that the aging process may cause further deterioration of esophageal motility.     

Barrett's metaplasia and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus in scleroderma

Gastroesophageal reflux is well documented in scleroderma, but the complications of Barrett's metaplasia and adenocarcinoma are not well described. The records of 75 patients with scleroderma seen over a four-year period at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania were retrospectively reviewed to determine the prevalence of Barrett's metaplasia and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and to identify clinical, manometric, laboratory, or radiographic criteria that might predict the presence of these lesions. Twenty-four of these patients underwent endoscopy. In this group, the prevalence of Barrett's metaplasia was 37 percent (nine patients) and adenocarcinoma was also present in two of these patients. The patients with and without Barrett's metaplasia were similar in age (range, 22 to 64 compared with 28 to 79, respectively), sex (six of nine compared with 12 of 15 female, respectively), frequency of esophageal motility disorders, presence of proximal skin involvement, digital ulceration, and pulmonary involvement as measured by diffusion capacity. Barrett's metaplasia was diagnosed on the basis of double-contrast esophagographic results in only one of eight patients with Barrett's metaplasia so-studied. Patients with Barrett's metaplasia tended to have longer duration of heartburn (90 +/- 40 months compared with 11 +/- 35 months) and dysphagia (39 +/- 22 months compared with 7 +/- 3 months). Patients with Barrett's metaplasia also tended to have greater impairment of lower esophageal sphincter pressure either at end-expiration (4.0 +/- 2.1 compared with 6.1 +/- 1.8 mm Hg) or mid-respiration (13.0 +/- 3.0 compared with 16.9 +/- 2.5 mm Hg). Using chi-square analysis, however, none of these differences reached statistical significance. Discrimination did occur on the basis of the presence of the CREST (calcinosis, Raynaud's phenomenon, esophageal manifestations of scleroderma, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasis) variant (55 percent compared with 7 percent, p less than 0.01), a duration of dysphagia of more than five months (p less than 0.03), and mid-respiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressure of less than 10 mm Hg (p less than 0.05). It is suggested that: Barrett's metaplasia of the esophagus occurs in one third of patients with scleroderma; clinical, manometric, laboratory, and radiographic features are poor predictors of the presence of Barrett's metaplasia; patients with CREST syndrome, prolonged dysphagia, or a very low lower esophageal sphincter pressure may have an increased risk for the development of metaplasia; patients with scleroderma and Barrett's metaplasia have an increased risk of complications such as stricture or adenocarcinoma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

End expiration is more accurate than mid respiration in measuring lower esophageal sphincter pressure

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Two ways popularly used to measure lower esophageal sphincter pressure are the mid-respiratory and end-expiratory methods. The aim of this study was to compare the suitability of these methods in the manometric assessment of patients with endoscopically documented esophagitis. METHODS: Manometry was performed on 22 consecutive patients to determine whether medical therapy or surgery was the more appropriate treatment strategy. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure was measured during a slow station pull-through. End-expiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressure was assessed by measuring the highest trough which coincided with end expiration. Mid-respiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressure was assessed by bracketing the highest pressure over >/=3 respiratory cycles and measuring the mid point. RESULTS: Mid-respiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressure (25.6 mm Hg) was higher (p < 0.0001) than end-expiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressure (15.7 mm Hg). Nine (41%) end-expiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressures were abnormally low (i.e., <10 mm Hg), whereas three (14%) mid-respiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressures were abnormally low (i.e., <14 mm Hg; p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS Mid-respiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressure measurement includes respiratory artifact and does not accurately measure lower esophageal sphincter pressure. End-expiratory sphincter pressure better identifies potential surgical candidates.     

Abnormal Esophageal Pressures in Reflux Esophagitis: Cause or Effect?

Thirteen patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent esophageal manometric evaluation during acute exacerbations and disease remission to evaluate lower esophageal sphincter and peristaltic pressure in response to treatment. No change was noted in lower esophageal sphincter pressure (15.2 +/- 2.6 mg versus 14.3 +/- 1.8 mm Hg) or peristaltic pressure (64.1 +/- 6.9 versus 62.1 +/- 7/8 mm Hg) with remission while both lower esophageal sphincter pressure and distal amplitude were lower in reflux patients than controls (p less than 0.05). Short-term treatment resulting in endoscopic and symptom improvement of gastroesophageal reflux disease does not appear to improve lower esophageal sphincter and peristaltic pressure.     

Manometric characteristics of the pharynx,upper esophageal sphincter,esophagus, and lower esophageal sphincter in patients with oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy

Improved techniques in esophageal manometry have made this test an attractive option for investigating pharyngeal or esophageal disorders in patients with dysphagia. We studied esophageal as well as upper esophageal sphincter/pharyngeal (UES/P) pressure dynamics in 11 patients with an established diagnosis of oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy with modern solidstate manometric techniques and then compared manometric and clinical findings. Esophageal manometric abnormalities were found in 10/11 patients, with the most common being simultaneous contractions and incomplete lower esophageal relaxation. 9/11 patients showed abnormal UES/P manometrics, with the most common abnormalities found in the pharynx. The presence of manometric abnormalities closely paralleled clinical assessment of degree of disease severity. Modern manometric techniques offer an opportunity for a quantitative assessment of swallow abnormalities.     

Incomplete Lower Esophageal Sphincter Relaxation in Subjects with Peristalsis: Prevalence and Clinical Outcome

Incomplete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation is recognized in achalasia and has been reported in subjects with esophageal spasm. We reviewed 500 consecutive manometric studies from a 3-yr period to determine the prevalence of this manometric finding, its association with other motility abnormalities, and the clinical outcome of subjects without associated aperistalsis (i.e., without achalasia). We identified 60 subjects with incomplete lower sphincter relaxation, 17 of whom had at least some normal peristalsis (3.4% of the total). Mean lower sphincter residual pressure for these 17 subjects (4.5 +/- 2.8 mm Hg) was intermediate between those with achalasia (11.7 +/- 6.8 mm Hg) and those with normal relaxation (0.1 +/- 0.2 mm Hg). Both peristaltic and contraction abnormalities in the esophageal body were prevalent in the 17 subjects compared with those who had normal relaxation. Outcome with conservative medical therapy after a mean follow-up of 3.3 yr was not significantly related to presence of peristaltic or contraction abnormalities at presentation, and 71% of subjects with or without these concomitant findings had improvement or complete resolution of symptoms. Only one subject worsened and was treated with pneumatic dilation. We conclude that incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter without aperistalsis is uncommon, symptom regression occurs with conservative therapy, and pneumatic dilation appears rarely required over a modest follow-up period.     

Manometric study in Kearns–Sayre syndrome

Although swallowing difficulties have been described in patients with Kearns-Sayre syndrome (KSS), the spectrum of manometric characteristics of dysphagia is not yet well known. Moreover, it is conceivable that a combination of various degrees of swallowing difficulties with different patterns in manometric studies exist, each playing a major role in the prognosis, natural history, and quality of life of KSS patients. An 18-year-old girl diagnosed at the age of 5 years with KSS (muscle biopsy) was admitted to our department with an upper respiratory tract infection and dysphagia. Clinical examination revealed growth retardation, external ophthalmoplegia, pigmentary retinopathy, impaired hearing, and ataxia. An electrocardiogram revealed cardiac conduction defects (long Q-T), and brain magnetic resonance imaging showed abnormalities in the cerebellar hemispheres. A manometric and motility study for dysphagia was conducted and the pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) resting pressures were similar to control group values, but the swallowing peak contraction pressure of the pharynx and the closing pressure of the UES were very low and could not promote effective peristaltic waves. Relaxation and coordination of the UES were not affected although pharyngeal and upper esophagus peristaltic waves proved to be very low and, consequently, were practically ineffective. The patient was started on treatment comprising a diet rich in potassium, magnesium, and calcium, and oral administration of vitamin D and co-enzyme Q10 100 mg daily; she was discharged 6 days later with apparent clinical improvement.     

Manometric and Radiologic Correlations in Achalasia

Achalasia is an esophageal motor disorder distinguished by clinical, radiologic, and manometric features. To evaluate the correlation among these features, we studied 109 achalasia patients. The four most common clinical complaints, the four most commonly encountered radiologic findings, and two manometric parameters were analyzed with a correlation matrix test and a multiple regression analysis. Significant correlation existed among symptoms of dysphagia, regurgitation, and weight loss. In contrast, chest pain inversely correlated with these symptoms. Dysphagia and weight loss significantly correlated with a bird-beak deformity but not with esophageal dilatation or a sigmoid esophagus. Moreover, no significant relationship between lower esophageal sphincter pressure and esophageal dilatation or sphincter pressure and sigmoid esophagus was found. However, in those patients with a resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure greater than 45 mm Hg, a reasonable correlation among clinical, radiologic, and manometric parameters did exist. In conclusion, although in a subset of patients with markedly increased lower esophageal sphincter pressure, a good correlation between clinical, radiologic, and manometric findings exists, such a correlation cannot be established in all of the achalasia patients; esophageal dilatation or a sigmoid esophagus may not be due to a hypertensive sphincter, and their presence must not necessarily be interpreted as an indication of severity of the disease; there is an inverse correlation between chest pain and symptoms of dysphagia, regurgitation, and weight loss; and finally, achalasia and hiatal hernia may coexist in 6% of the patients.     

Dilatation therapy for dysphagia in patients with upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction--manometric and symptomatic response.

Inability to maintain oral nutrition due to oropharyngeal dysphagia is common in patients with a variety of neurological and neuromuscular disorders and severely affects quality of life. Cricopharyngeal dilatation has been used as empiric therapy in these patients, but little data exist on symptom response and there is no data on the effect on the manometric characteristics of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and pharynx. We studied 10 patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia and either elevated upper esophageal sphincter resting pressure, or a high residual pressure or attenuated duration of relaxation on swallowing. Dilatation therapy was performed with an 18-20 mm Savary dilator and manometry was repeated after an average period of 4 weeks. Nine out of 10 patients had improvement in dysphagia and have maintained oral nutrition for a mean follow-up of 13 months. UES residual pressure decreased in nine out of 10 patients and the group median value decreased significantly from 10.8 mmHg pretreatment to 5.7 mmHg after therapy (P < 0.05). UES resting pressure decreased in eight out of 10 patients and the group median value decreased from 82 to 43 mmHg (P < 0.05). Duration of relaxation did not change significantly. Videoradiography was normal in five out of nine responders to therapy. For selected patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia and manometric signs of UES dysfunction, dilatation therapy may give excellent symptomatic relief, apparently by reducing UES resting pressure and/or increasing the duration and completeness of relaxation.     

Deterioration of esophageal motility with age: a manometric study of 79 healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE: Data are limited on the effect of age on esophageal function. We evaluated whether aging influences the motor activity of the esophagus. METHODS: Standard esophageal manometry was performed in 79 healthy, nonpaid volunteers of both sexes, 18-73 yr of age. Lower (LES) and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) characteristics and the properties of esophageal peristaltic waves were assessed by age groups: < or = 25 yr, 26-35 yr, 36-45 yr, 46-55 yr, 56-65 yr, and > 65 yr. RESULTS: Age correlated inversely with LES pressure and length, UES pressure and length, and peristaltic wave amplitude and velocity, and correlated directly with the proportion of simultaneous contractions. Age was inversely correlated with the upper limits of normality (95th percentiles) of LES pressure (r = -0.943, p = 0.005), UES pressure (r = -0.943, p = 0.005), middle and lower peristaltic wave amplitude (r = -0.947, p = 0.004, and r = -0.844, p = 0.035, respectively), upper/middle peristaltic progression speed (r = -0.943, p = 0.005), and the proportion of simultaneous contractions (r = 0.926, p = 0.008), but not with the lower normal limits (5th percentiles) of these variables. Gender did not affect esophageal motility variables. The 95th percentiles of LES pressure differed by 20 mm Hg, those of lower peristaltic amplitude by 82 mm Hg, and those of percent simultaneous contractions by a factor of 2, between the younger and the older age groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that normal esophageal motility deteriorates with advancing age. Thus, age-related normality limits of esophageal pressures should be considered before establishing the manometric diagnosis of hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders.     

Measurement of upper esophageal sphincter pressure. Effect of acute emotional stress

Recent studies suggest that resting upper esophageal sphincter pressure is more labile than previously thought, being augmented during rapid manometric pull-through and markedly decreased during sleep and anesthesia. The effect of acute emotional stress on resting upper esophageal sphincter pressure was evaluated in 13 normal subjects with a manometric sleeve assembly. Manometric sideholes were positioned in the pharynx and cervical and thoracic esophagus while the sleeve sensor straddled the upper esophageal sphincter. Subjects were stressed intermittently by 14-min periods of a dichotic listening task. As incentive, a financial reward was offered and made commensurate with performance. Alterations of heart rate, blood pressure, and skin conductance confirmed the effectiveness of the stressor. The overall mean upper esophageal sphincter pressure during control periods was 46.5 mmHg (SEM = 4.7). During stress there was a significant mean increase (11.8 +/- 2.9 mmHg; p = 0.002) in upper esophageal sphincter pressure from control levels, and the pressure increase during the first 2-min epoch of stress was 20.8 +/- 3.9 mmHg (p = 0.0003). Emotional stress causes significant elevation of upper esophageal pressure in normal subjects. This effect is likely to influence resting sphincter pressure measurements, particularly if measurement conditions are stressful to the subject.     

Classic and vigorous achalasia: a comparison of manometric, radiographic, and clinical findings

Compared with classic achalasia, vigorous achalasia has been defined as achalasia with relatively high esophageal contraction amplitudes, often with minimal esophageal dilation and prominent tertiary contractions on radiographs, and with the presence of chest pain. However, no study using current manometric techniques has compared manometric, radiographic, and clinical findings in vigorous and classic achalasia or questioned the usefulness of making this distinction. Fifty-four cases involving patients with achalasia whose radiographic and manometric studies were performed within 6 months of each other were available for review. Patients with vigorous achalasia (n = 17), defined by amplitude greater than or equal to 37 mm Hg, and patients with classic achalasia (n = 37), defined as amplitude less than 37 mm Hg, had substantial overlap in radiographic parameters of esophageal dilation, tortuosity, and tertiary contractions. Manometric properties of repetitive waves and lower esophageal sphincter pressure and clinical aspects of chest pain, dysphagia, heartburn, and satisfactory responses to pneumatic dilation were similar in both forms of achalasia. A separate analysis of patients with mean contraction amplitude greater than 60 mm Hg revealed similar findings. It is concluded that use of amplitude as a criterion for classifying achalasia is arbitrary and of dubious value.     

Concurrent Fluoroscopy and Manometry Reveal Differences in Laparoscopic Nissen and Anterior Fundoplication

A prospective double-blind randomized trial wasinitiated to examine two types of laparoscopicfundoplication (Nissen and anterior). Thirty-twopatients with proven gastroesophageal reflux diseasepresenting for primary laparoscopic antireflux surgerywere randomized to undergo either Nissen fundoplication(N = 13) or anterior hemifundoplication (N = 19).Postoperative fluoroscopic and manometric examinationwas carried out concomitantly. Nissenfundoplication resulted in significantly greaterelevation of resting (33.5 vs 23 mm Hg) and residuallower esophageal sphincter pressures (17 vs 6.5 mm Hg)and lower esophageal ramp pressure (26 vs 20.5 mm Hg) than theanterior partial fundoplication. A smallerradiologically measured sphincter opening diameter wasseen following Nissen fundoplication (9 mm) comparedwith anterior fundoplication (12 mm). Lower esophageal ramppressure correlated weakly (r = 0.37, P = 0.04) withpostoperative dysphagia. It is concluded that the typeof fundoplication performed significantly influences postoperative manometric and video bariumradiology outcomes. The clinical relevance of thisrequires further investigation.     

Manometric characteristics of cervical dysphagia in a patient with the Kearns-Sayre syndrome.

The manometric findings of deglutitive pharyngoesophageal function in a patient with the Kearns-Sayre syndrome and cervical dysphagia are described. These findings indicate that striated muscles of the pharynx, upper esophageal sphincter (UES), and proximal esophagus are involved. Near absence of pharyngeal peristalsis, abnormally low UES resting pressure, and absence of proximal esophageal peristalsis characterize the manometric findings in this patient. It is conceivable that in mild cases, a combination of various degrees of severity of the above findings may exist.