Role of imaging in evaluating the response after neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy. Despite the development of multimodality treatments, including surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, the long-term prognosis of patients with PDAC remains poor. Recently, the introduction of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) has made more patients amenable to surgery, increasing the possibility of R0 resection, treatment of occult micro-metastasis, and prolongation of overall survival. Imaging plays a vital role in tumor response evaluation after NAT. However, conventional imaging modalities such as multidetector computed tomography have limited roles in the assessment of tumor resectability after NAT for PDAC because of the similar appearance of tissue fibrosis and tumor infiltration. Perfusion computed tomography, using blood perfusion as a biomarker, provides added value in predicting the histopathologic response of PDAC to NAT by reflecting the changes in tumor matrix and fibrosis content. Other imaging technologies, including diffusion-weighted imaging of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography, can reveal the tumor response by monitoring the structural changes in tumor cells and functional metabolic changes in tumors after NAT. In addition, with the renewed interest in data acquisition and analysis, texture analysis and radiomics have shown potential for the early evaluation of the response to NAT, thus improving patient stratification to achieve accurate and intensive treatment. In this review, we briefly introduce the application and value of NAT in resectable and unresectable PDAC. We also summarize the role of imaging in evaluating the response to NAT for PDAC, as well as the advantages, limitations, and future development directions of current imaging techniques.     

Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on gut microbiome in patients with resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background/Objectives: Effects of chemotherapy on gut microbiota have been reported in various carcinomas. The current study aimed to evaluate the changes in the gut microbiota before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and understand their clinical implications.MethodsTwenty patients diagnosed with R/BR-PDAC were included in this study. Stool samples were collected at two points, before and after NAC, for microbiota analysis using 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene sequences.ResultsOf the 20 patients, 18 (90%) were treated with gemcitabine plus S-1 as NAC, and the remaining patients received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and a fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination. No significant differences were observed in the α- and β-diversity before and after NAC. Bacterial diversity was not associated with Evans classification (histological grade of tumor destruction by NAC) or postoperative complications. The relative abundance of Actinobacteria phylum after NAC was significantly lower than that before NAC (P = 0.02). At the genus level, the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium before NAC in patients with Evans grade 2 disease was significantly higher than that in patients with Evans grade 1 disease (P = 0.03). Patients with Evans grade 2 lost significantly more Bifidobacterium than patients with Evans grade 1 (P = 0.01).ConclusionsThe diversity of gut microbiota was neither decreased by NAC for R/BR-PDAC nor associated with postoperative complications. Lower incidence of Bifidobacterium genus before NAC may be associated with a lower pathological response to NAC.     

Pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

BackgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated the prognostic significance of pathologic tumor response in pancreatic adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of significant pathologic response to NAT in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), and association of NAT regimen and other clinico-pathologic characteristics with pathologic response.MethodsPatients with BRPC who underwent NAT and pancreatic resection between January 2012 and June 2017 were included. Pathologic response was assessed on a qualitative scale based on the College of American Pathologists grading system. Demographics and baseline characteristics, oncologic treatment, pathology, and survival outcomes were compared.ResultsSeventy-one patients were included for analysis. Four patients had complete pathologic responses (tumor regression score 0), 12 patients had marked responses (score 1), 42 had moderate responses (score 2), and 13 had minimal responses (score 3). Patients with complete or marked responses were more likely to have received neoadjuvant gemcitabine chemoradiation (62.5%, 38.1%, and 23.1% of the complete/marked, moderate, and minimal response groups, respectively; P = 0.04). Of the complete/marked, moderate, and minimal response groups, margins were negative in 75.0%, 78.6%, and 46.2% (P = 0.16); node negative disease was observed in 87.5%, 54.8%, and 15.4% (P < 0.01); and median overall survival was 50.0 months, 31.7 months, and 23.2 months (P = 0.563). Of the four patients with pathologic complete responses, three were disease-free at 66.1, 41.7 and 31.4 months, and one was deceased with metastatic liver disease at 16.9 months.ConclusionsA more pronounced pathologic tumor response to NAT in BRPC is correlated with node negative disease, but was not associated with a statistically significant survival benefit in this study.     

Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: The need for patient-centered research

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive cancer with high recurrence rates following surgical resection.While adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival,a significant proportion of patients are unable to initiate or complete all intended therapy following pancreatectomy due to postoperative complications or poor performance status.The administration of chemotherapy prior to surgical resection is an alternative strategy that ensures its early and near universal delivery as well as improves margin-negative resection rates and potentially improves long-term survival outcomes.Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly being recommended to patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,however,patient-centered research on its use is lacking.In this review,we highlight opportunities to focus research efforts in the domains of patient preferences,patient-reported outcomes,patient experience,and survivorship.Novel research in these areas may identify relevant barriers and facilitators to the use of neoadjuvant therapy thereby increasing its utilization,improve shareddecision making for patients and providers,and optimize the experience of those undergoing neoadjuvant therapy.     

Preoperative risk factors for positivity of peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the era of neoadjuvant therapy

BackgroundThe preoperative risk factors for positive peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) are unknown, especially in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, the optimal indications for staging laparoscopy (SL) are still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the preoperative risk factors of CY positivity in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with surgical resection and to determine the optimal indications for SL.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 493 patients with PDAC, including 356 treated with upfront surgery and 137 treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The preoperative risk factor for CY positivity was investigated along with stratification according to NAC.ResultsAmong the 493 patients, 36 (7.3%) were CY-positive. The CY-positive frequency in patients who received and did not receive NAC was 9 (6.6%) and 27 (7.6%), respectively. In the multivariate analyses, no independent preoperative predictive factor was found in patients who received NAC, whereas body and tail PDAC were identified as an independent risk factor for CY positivity in patients who did not receive NAC.ConclusionsThe preoperative risk factors of CY-positive PDAC are body and tail PDAC in 356 patients who did not receive NAC. However, there is no useful predictive factor for CY positivity in patients treated with NAC. Based on these results, it was difficult to determine the optimal indication for SL especially in NAC cases.     

GRP78 expression and prognostic significance in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant therapy versus surgery first

BackgroundGlucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) plays an essential role in protein folding, transportation, and degradation, thus regulates ER homeostasis and promotes cell survival, proliferation and invasion. GRP78 expression in PDAC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy has not been reported.MethodsThis retrospective study of resected PDAC patients included 125 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and 140 patients treated with surgery first (SF). The expression of GRP78 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays and the results were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and survival.ResultsGRP78 expression was higher in SF patients compared to NAT patients (P < 0.001). In SF cohort, the median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with GRP78-positive tumors were 11.2 months and 25.0 months, respectively, compared to DFS of 52.1 months (P = 0.008) and OS of 69.5 months (P = 0.02) for those with GRP78-negative tumors. GRP78 expression correlated with higher frequency of recurrent/metastasis (P = 0.045). In NAT cohort, GRP78 expression correlated with shorter OS (P = 0.03), but not DFS (P = 0.08). GRP78 expression was an independent prognosticator for both DFS (P = 0.02) and OS (P = 0.049) in SF cohort and was an independent prognosticator for OS (P = 0.03), but not for DFS (P = 0.06) in NAT cohort by multivariate analysis.ConclusionsOur study showed that GRP78 expression in NAT cohort is lower than that in SF cohort. GRP78 expression correlated with shorter survival in both SF and NAT patients. Our findings suggest that targeting GRP78 may help to improve the prognosis in PDAC patients.     

Therapeutic drug monitoring of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundDespite a potentially curative treatment, the prognosis after upfront surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is poor. Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) is a cornerstone in the systemic treatment of PDAC, including the neoadjuvant setting. Pharmacokinetic-guided (PKG) dosing has demonstrated beneficial effects in other tumors, but scarce data is available in pancreatic cancer.MethodsForty-six patients with resected PDAC after mFOLFIRINOX neoadjuvant approach and included in an institutional protocol for anticancer drug monitoring were retrospectively analyzed. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) dosage was adjusted throughout neoadjuvant treatment according to pharmacokinetic parameters and Irinotecan (CPT-11) pharmacokinetic variables were retrospectively estimated.ResultsBy exploratory univariate analyses, a significantly longer progression-free survival was observed for patients with either 5-FU area under the curve (AUC) above 28 mcg·h/mL or CPT-11 AUC values below 10 mcg·h/mL. In the multivariate analyses adjusted by age, gender, performance status and resectability after stratification according to both pharmacokinetic parameters, the risk of progression was significantly reduced in patients with 5-FU AUC ≥28 mcg·h/mL [HR = 0.251, 95% CI 0.096–0.656; p = 0.005] and CPT-11 AUC <10 mcg·h/mL [HR = 0.189, 95% CI 0.073–0.486, p = 0.001].ConclusionsPharmacokinetically-guided dose adjustment of standard chemotherapy treatments might improve survival outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.     

Prognostic impact of intraoperative peritoneal cytology after neoadjuvant therapy for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer

BackgroundNeoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is considered a potential approach to improve survival for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA). The objective of this study was to identify the clinical implications of washing peritoneal cytology (CY) status after NAT.MethodsBetween 2005 and 2016, 151 consecutive patients with resectable (R)/borderline resectable (BR) PA underwent NAT with intention of subsequent resection at our institution. Of them, 13 and 123 patients underwent pancreatectomies with positive (CY+) and negative (CY-) cytology, respectively, while the remaining 15 patients did not undergo resection due to gross metastases at laparotomy. The clinicopathological factors influencing overall survival were clarified by the uni- and multivariate analyses.ResultsThe postoperative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were markedly worse in patients who underwent resection with CY+, compared with those who were CY- (median OS, 14.8 m vs 30.8 m, p = 0.026, and median DFS 6.0 m vs 15.1 m, p = 0.008). According to the resectability by NCCN guidelines, CY+ indicates worse prognosis than CY- in R-PA patients (mOS: 30.1 m vs 71.1 m: p = 0.080). Similarly, in BR-PA patients, CY+ showed the significantly worse prognosis than CY- (mOS: 13.8 m vs 24.5 m: p = 0.048), which prognosis is comparable with patients who did not undergo resection. The multivariate analysis revealed that resectability, CY status and the induction of adjuvant therapy were significant predictors of postoperative OS (p = 0.007: Hazard ratio 2.264, 0.040:2.094 and 0.002:3.246, respectively).ConclusionsCY+ is a significant predictor of poorer prognosis in PA patients after NAT. The subsequent pancreatectomies with CY+ after NAT do not contribute to prolonged survival.     

International consensus on definition and criteria of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 2017

This statement was developed to promote international consensus on the definition of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) which was adopted by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) in 2006, but which has changed yearly and become more complicated. Based on a symposium held during the 20th meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) in Sendai, Japan, in 2016, the presenters sought consensus on issues related to BR-PDAC. We defined patients with BR-PDAC according to the three distinct dimensions: anatomical (A), biological (B), and conditional (C). Anatomic factors include tumor contact with the superior mesenteric artery and/or celiac artery of less than 180° without showing stenosis or deformity, tumor contact with the common hepatic artery without showing tumor contact with the proper hepatic artery and/or celiac artery, and tumor contact with the superior mesenteric vein and/or portal vein including bilateral narrowing or occlusion without extending beyond the inferior border of the duodenum. Biological factors include potentially resectable disease based on anatomic criteria but with clinical findings suspicious for (but unproven) distant metastases or regional lymph nodes metastases diagnosed by biopsy or positron emission tomography-computed tomography. This also includes a serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19–9 level more than 500 units/ml. Conditional factors include the patients with potentially resectable disease based on anatomic and biologic criteria and with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or more. The definition of BR-PDAC requires one or more positive dimensions (e.g. A, B, C, AB, AC, BC or ABC). The present definition acknowledges that resectability is not just about the anatomic relationship between the tumor and vessels, but that biological and conditional dimensions are also important. The aim in presenting this consensus definition is also to highlight issues which remain controversial and require further research.     

Patient outcome according to the 2017 international consensus on the definition of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background/objectiveWe evaluated the usefulness of the 2017 definition of borderline pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) in fit patients (performance status 0–1) based on anatomical (A) and biological dimensions (B).MethodsFrom 2011 to 2018, 139 resected patients with BR-PDAC according to the 2017 definition were included: 18 patients underwent upfront pancreatectomy (CA 19-9 > 500 U/mL and/or regional lymph node metastasis; BR-B group), and 121 received FOLFIRINOX (FX) induction chemotherapy and were divided into BR-A (CA 19-9 < 500 U/mL, no regional lymph node metastasis; n = 68) and BR-AB (CA 19-9 > 500 U/mL and/or regional lymph node metastasis; n = 53) groups.ResultsThe 3 groups were comparable according to patient characteristics (except for back pain (P < .01) and CA 19-9 (P < .01)), intraoperative data, and postoperative courses. BR-AB patients required more venous resections (P < .01). The 3 groups were comparable on pathologic findings, except that BR-B patients had more lymph node invasions (P = .02). Median overall survival (OS) of the 121 patients was 45 months. In multivariate analysis, venous resection (P = .039) and R1 resection (P = .012) were poorly linked with OS, whereas BR-A classification (P < .01) independently favored OS. Median survival times of BR-A, BR-AB, and BR-B groups were undetermined, 27 months, and 20 months (P < .001), respectively.ConclusionsThe 2017 definition was relevant for sub-classifying patients with BR-PDAC. The anatomical dimension (BR-A) was a favorable prognostic factor, whereas the biological dimension (BR-AB and BR-B) poorly impacted survival.     

Prognostic value of the preoperative fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients undergoing R0 resection

BACKGROUNDInflammation plays an important role in tumor progression, and growing evidence has confirmed that the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) is an important prognostic factor for overall survival in malignant tumors.AIMTo investigate the prognostic significance of FAR in patients undergoing radical R0 resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed the data of 282 patients with PDAC who underwent radical R0 resection at The Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2010 to December 2019. The surv_cutpoint function of the R package survminer via RStudio software (version 1.3.1073, http://www.rstudio.org) was used to determine the optimal cut-off values of biological markers, such as preoperative FAR. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used for univariate survival analysis, and a Cox regression model was used for multivariate survival analysis for PDAC patients who underwent radical R0 resection.RESULTSThe optimal cut-off value of FAR was 0.08 by the surv_cutpoint function. Higher preoperative FAR was significantly correlated with clinical symptoms (P = 0.001), tumor location (P < 0.001), surgical approaches (P < 0.001), preoperative plasma fibrinogen concentration (P < 0.001), and preoperative plasma albumin level (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that degree of tumor differentiation (P < 0.001), number of metastatic lymph nodes [hazard ratio (HR): 0.678, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.509-0.904, P = 0.008], adjuvant therapy (HR: 1.604, 95%CI: 1.214-2.118, P = 0.001), preoperative cancer antigen 19-9 level (HR: 1.740, 95%CI: 1.288-2.352, P < 0.001), and preoperative FAR (HR: 2.258, 95%CI: 1.720-2.963, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with PDAC who underwent radical R0 resection.CONCLUSIONThe increase in preoperative FAR was significantly related to poor prognosis in patients undergoing radical R0 resection for PDAC. Preoperative FAR can be used clinically to predict the prognosis of PDAC patients undergoing radical R0 resection.     

Prior history of acute pancreatitis predicts poor survival in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background/objectivesMounting evidence has suggested that acute pancreatitis (AP) is a risk factor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but its role in survival in PDAC patients was rarely investigated. The objective was to investigate the association of a history of AP with survival among PDAC patients who underwent surgical resection.MethodsA retrospective cohort study comprising 632 patients who were diagnosed with resectable PDAC was conducted. Survival was evaluated by history of AP prior to a diagnosis of PDAC using Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests. Multivariate analyses for mortality were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score matching methods were used to balance the difference of clinical characteristics between patients with and without AP history.ResultsThe log-rank tests showed that patients with a history of AP had a worse overall survival than those without a history of AP (p = 0.006). The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for mortality comparing participants with AP to those without AP was 1.808 (95% CI: 1.241–2.632, p = 0.002). Patients with a recent history of AP (<2 years), rather than patients with a remote history of AP (≥2 years), were found to have significantly worse survival (p = 0.014) than those without a history of AP. After adjusted for PSM, history of AP remained an independent survival predictor of PDAC following surgical resection.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that a history of AP, especially a recent history of AP, is associated with poor survival among patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.     

Prospective assessment of resection margin status following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after standardisation of margin definitions

BackgroundSurgical resection remains the only curative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The prognostic value of resection margin status following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains controversial. Standardised pathological assessment increases positive margins but limited data is available on the significance of involved margins. We investigated the impact of resection margin status in PDAC on patient outcome.MethodWe identified all patients with PD for PDAC at one pancreatic cancer centre between August 2008 and December 2014. Demographic, operative, adjuvant therapeutic and survival data was obtained. Pathology data including resection margin status of specific anatomic margins was collected and analysed.Results107 patients were included, all pathologically staged as T3 with 102 N1. 87.9% of patients were R1 of which 53.3% showed direct extension to the resection margin. Median survival for R0 patients versus R1<1 mm and R1 = 0 mm was 28.4 versus 15.4 and 25.1 versus 13.4 months. R1 = 0 mm status remained a predictor of poor outcome on multivariate analysis. Evaluation of individual margins (R1<1 mm) showed the SMV and SMA margins were associated with poorer overall survival. Multiple involved margins impacted negatively on outcome. SMA margin patient outcome with R1 = 1–1.9 mm was similar to R1=>2 mm.ConclusionUsing an R1 definition of <1 mm and standardised pathology we demonstrate that R1 rates in PDAC can approach 90%. R1 = 0 mm remained an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. Using R1<1 mm we have shown that involvement of medial margins and multiple margins has significant negative impact on overall survival. We conclude that not all margin positivity has the same prognostic significance.     

High CA19-9 level in resectable pancreatic cancer is a potential indication of neoadjuvant treatment

BackgroundPrevious studies on borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic cancer (PC) included patients with heterogenous preoperative states; however, the definition of resectability for PC has evolved. We aimed to investigate the prognostic factors for PC other than anatomical resectability in those who underwent upfront resection and discuss the optimal treatment strategy for PC.MethodsWe retrospectively examined 431 patients who underwent upfront surgery with curative intent between 2007 and 2014. The association between clinical characteristics and survival outcomes was assessed by stratifying patients according to risk factors. The patients were categorized into four groups based on anatomical (resectable [R]/BR) and biological features (CA19-9 ≤500/>500 U/mL): anatomical R with CA19-9 ≤500 U/mL (favorable-R); anatomical BR with CA19-9 ≤500 U/mL (favorable-BR); anatomical R with CA19-9 >500 U/mL (risky-R); and anatomical BR with CA19-9 >500 U/mL (risky-BR).ResultsOverall, 320 and 111 patients had anatomical R- and BR-PC, respectively. A modified Glasgow prognostic score = 2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.73), NLR>5 (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.54), CA19-9 >500 U/mL (HR: 1.86), and anatomical BR (HR: 1.38) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. The risky-R group had likely worse prognosis (16 months vs. 19 months, P = 0.0605) and a significantly higher early recurrence rate (36% vs 18%, P = 0.0231) than the favorable-BR group.ConclusionsIt is essential to stratify and distinguish PC patients at a high risk of worse prognosis. Risky-R was an unfavorable prognostic factor and should thus be considered in the decision-making for treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in addition to anatomical BR-PC.     

Recent advances in artificial intelligence for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains the most lethal type of cancer. The 5-year survival rate for patients with early-stage diagnosis can be as high as 20%, suggesting that early diagnosis plays a pivotal role in the prognostic improvement of PDAC cases. In the medical field, the broad availability of biomedical data has led to the advent of the “big data” era. To overcome this deadly disease, how to fully exploit big data is a new challenge in the era of precision medicine. Artificial intelligence (AI) is the ability of a machine to learn and display intelligence to solve problems. AI can help to transform big data into clinically actionable insights more efficiently, reduce inevitable errors to improve diagnostic accuracy, and make real-time predictions. AI-based omics analyses will become the next alterative approach to overcome this poor-prognostic disease by discovering biomarkers for early detection, providing molecular/genomic subtyping, offering treatment guidance, and predicting recurrence and survival. Advances in AI may therefore improve PDAC survival outcomes in the near future. The present review mainly focuses on recent advances of AI in PDAC for clinicians. We believe that breakthroughs will soon emerge to fight this deadly disease using AI-navigated precision medicine.     

McGill Brisbane Symptom Score for patients with resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the ability of the McGill Brisbane Symptom Score (MBSS) to predict survival in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma (PHA) patients.METHODS: All PHA patients (n = 83) undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at the McGill University Health Center, Quebec between 1/2001-1/2010 were evaluated. Data related to patient and cancer characteristics, MBSS variables, and treatment were collected; univariable and multivariable survival analyses were performed. We obtained complete follow-up until February 2011 in all patients through the database of the provincial health insurance plan of Quebec. The unique health insurance numbers of these patients were used to retrieve information from this database which captures all billable clinical encounters, and ensures 100% actual survival data.RESULTS: Median survival was 23 mo overall: 45 mo for patients with low MBSS, 17 mo for high MBSS (P = 0.005). At twelve months survival was 83.3% (95%CI: 66.6-92.1) vs 58.1% (95%CI: 42.1-71.2) in those with low vs high MBSS, and24 mo survival was 63.8% (95%CI: 45.9-77.1) and 34.0% (95%CI: 20.2-48.2) respectively. In the multivariate Cox model (stratified by chemotherapy), after addition of clinically meaningful covariates, MBSS was the variable with the strongest association with survival (HR = 2.63; P = 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy interacted with MBSS category such that only high MBSS patients accrued a benefit. In univariate analysis we found a lower mortality in high MBSS but not low MBSS patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. This interaction variable, on Cox model, resulted in an adjusted mortality HR for the high MBSS (compared to low MBSS) of 4.14 (95%CI: 1.48-11.64) without chemotherapy and 2.11 (95%CI: 1.06-4.17) with chemotherapy.CONCLUSION: The MBSS is a simple prognostic tool for resectable PHA. Preoperative categorization of patients according to the MBSS allows effective stratification of patients to guide therapy.     

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is one of the most aggressive human malignancies, ranking 4th among causes for cancer-related death in the Western world including the United States. Surgical resection offers the only chance of cure, but only 15 to 20 percent of cases are potentially resectable at presentation. Different studies demonstrate and confirm that advanced pancreatic cancer is among the most complex cancers to treat and that these tumors are relatively resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Currently there is no consensus around the world on what constitutes "standard" adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. This controversy derives from several studies, each fraught with its own limitations. Standards of care also vary somewhat with regard to geography and economy, for instance chemo-radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy or vice versa is considered the optimal therapy in North America while chemotherapy alone is the current standard in Europe. Regardless of the efforts in adjuvant and neoadjuvant improved therapy, the major goal to combat pancreatic cancer is to find diagnostic markers, identifying the disease in a pre-metastatic stage and making a curative treatment accessible to more patients. In this review, authors examined the different therapy options for advanced pancreatic patients in recent years and the future directions in adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments for these patients.     

Positron emission tomography and pathological evidence of response to neoadjuvant therapy in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

SUMMARY.  Our aim was to determine if fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) could be correlated with a pathological response in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation therapy. Patients with resectable, histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were entered in the study. Preoperative chemotherapy comprised two cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Radiation therapy commenced with the second cycle on day 22. FDG-PET images were obtained pre-treatment and on completion of intended neo-adjuvant treatment. Quantification was achieved by the calculation of both standardized uptake values (SUV) and tumor/liver ratios (TLR). Evidence of histopathological response was identified according to the Mandard tumor regression scoring system. There were 45 patients, 22 receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 23 chemoradiation therapy. Forty patients underwent surgical resection. Seven patients (16%) had a histopathological response. The mean percentage change in SUV in the histological responders group was –56.8% (SD 29) and in the non-responders –27.8% (SD 32.1) ( P =  0.035). The mean percentage change in TLR was –49.1% (SD 44.8) in the responders and in the non-responders –27.3% (SD 31.3) ( P =  0.128). There was no difference between the two methods of assessment, however there was less variation with SUV. There was no correlation between the FDG-PET response and the histopathological response. Presently an FDG-PET scan performed 3–6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus should not be used as a marker of the potential result of the treatment. The optimal timing of a second FDG-PET remains unclear.