Increasing source to image distance for AP pelvis imaging – Impact on radiation dose and image quality

AimA quantative primary study to determine whether increasing source to image distance (SID), with and without the use of automatic exposure control (AEC) for antero-posterior (AP) pelvis imaging, reduces dose whilst still producing an image of diagnostic quality.MethodsUsing a computed radiography (CR) system, an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom was positioned for an AP examination using the table bucky. SID was initially set at 110 cm, with tube potential set at a constant 75 kVp, with two outer chambers selected and a fine focal spot of 0.6 mm. SID was then varied from 90 cm to 140 cm with two exposures made at each 5 cm interval, one using the AEC and another with a constant 16 mAs derived from the initial exposure. Effective dose (E) and entrance surface dose (ESD) were calculated for each acquisition. Seven experienced observers blindly graded image quality using a 5-point Likert scale and 2 Alternative Forced Choice software. Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) was calculated for comparison. For each acquisition, femoral head diameter was also measured for magnification indication.ResultsResults demonstrated that when increasing SID from 110 cm to 140 cm, both E and ESD reduced by 3.7% and 17.3% respectively when using AEC and 50.13% and 41.79% respectively, when the constant mAs was used. No significant statistical (T-test) difference (p = 0.967) between image quality was detected when increasing SID, with an intra-observer correlation of 0.77 (95% confidence level). SNR reduced slightly for both AEC (38%) and no AEC (36%) with increasing SID.ConclusionFor CR, increasing SID significantly reduces both E and ESD for AP pelvis imaging without adversely affecting image quality.     

Isotropic 3D fast spin-echo imaging versus standard 2D imaging at 3.0 T of the knee—image quality and diagnostic performance

The objective of this study was to compare a newly developed fat-saturated intermediate-weighted (IM-w) 3D fast spin-echo (FSE) sequence with standard 2D IM-w FSE sequences regarding image quality and diagnostic performance in assessing abnormal findings of the knee. MR imaging was performed at 3.0 T in 50 patients. Images were assessed independently by three radiologists. Image quality was rated significantly higher (p < 0.05) for the 2D versus the 3D FSE sequences. Sensitivity for cartilage lesions was slightly higher for the 3D sequence, but specificity was lower. Low contrast objects were better visualized with 2D sequences, while high contrast objects were better shown with the 3D sequence. Confidence scores were higher for 2D than for 3D sequences, but differences were not significant. In conclusion, isotropic 3D FSE IM-w imaging may enhance standard knee MRI by increased visualization of high contrast lesions; however, 3D FSE image quality was lower.     

Quality use of diagnostic imaging in trauma,and the impact on emergency medical practice—a retrospective clinical audit

Purpose

The current study aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of the decisions made to order diagnostic imaging for emergency trauma patients.

Methods

A retrospective audit of 642 clinical decisions for 370 non-consecutive trauma cases was conducted at a level 1 adult trauma centre. Radiographs and computed tomography investigations were compared for compliance with the American College of Radiology/European Society of Radiology (ACR/ESR) imaging guidelines. The non-compliant imaging orders were evaluated for the following medical officer ranks: Junior Medical Officer (JMO), Senior Resident Medical Officer (SRMO), Emergency Medicine Registrar (EMR) and Consultants/Career Medical Officer (CMO). The time of imaging order (day/evening or night shift), whether the imaging led to conservative or surgical patient management, and whether the imaging order decisions led to a change in the clinical management of the patient were also considered.

Results

Non-compliance with the ACR/ESR guidelines was low. At least half of non-compliant decisions made by each level of medical officer resulted in a change in patient management. In total, 11 (65%), 25 (53%), 12 (63%) and 11 (52%) of non-compliant imaging orders placed by JMOs, SRMOs, EMRs and Consultants, respectively, resulted in change of patient management. JMOs and SRMOs ordered a significantly higher proportion of non-compliant imaging studies for conservatively managed patients in comparison to surgically managed patients.

Conclusion

This study highlighted that most non-compliant imaging orders benefited the patient.

     

Does diffusion-weighted imaging add diagnostic confidence in discriminating between benign and malignant solid focal liver lesions?

We investigated whether diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI) adds diagnostic confidence in assessing focal liver lesions (FLLs). By reviewing FLLs without and with DWI at 1.5 T, two radiologists scored the confidence in diagnosing benignancy/malignancy (confidence score), and DWI usefulness (usefulness score). We showed that adding DWI significantly decreased the confidence score of the most experienced radiologist and increased his confidence in false-negative diagnoses showing atypical features on conventional magnetic resonance imaging.     

Emergency CT head and neck imaging: effects of swimmer’s position on dose and image quality

Objectives

To compare the effects of different arm positions on dose exposure and image quality (IQ) in cervical spine CT after trauma in different patient groups.

Methods

Patients in standard (STD?=?126) and in swimmer’s position (SWIM?=?254) were included. Body mass index (BMI subgroup 1?=?underweight to subgroup 4?=?obese), anterior–posterior diameter (AP), left–right diameter (LR), area of an ellipse (AoE) and angle between the humeral heads (optimal STD?<?3°, optimal SWIM?>?10°) were used as grouping criteria. Computed tomography dose index (CTDI) was documented. Two radiologists rated the IQ at three levels (CV1/2, CV4/5, CV7/T1) using a semi-quantitative scale (0?=?not diagnostic, 1?=?diagnostic with limitations, 2?=?diagnostic without limitations). The Mann–Whitney U test correlations of grouping criteria with dose effects and intra-class correlation (ICC) were calculated.

Results

ICC was 0.87. BMI grouping showed the strongest correlation with dose effects: CTDI of optimal STD versus optimal SWIM positioning was 3.17 mGy versus 2.46 mGy (subgroup 1), 5.47 mGy versus 3.97 mGy (subgroup 2), 7.35 mGy versus 5.96 mGy (subgroup 3) and 8.71 mGy versus 8.18 mGy (subgroup 4). Mean IQ at CV7/T1 was 1.65 versus 1.23 (subgroup 1), 1.27 versus 1.46 (subgroup 2), 1.06 versus 1.46 (subgroup 3), 0.79 versus 1.5 (subgroup 4).

Conclusion

Patients with a BMI?>?20 kg/m² benefited from both potential dose reduction and improved image quality at the critical cervicothoracic junction when swimmer’s position was used.

Key Points

? BMI is a useful metric for personalized optimization in CT for the c-spine. ? Using swimmer’s position, patients can benefit from dose reduction. ? In some patients a superior image quality can be achieved with swimmer’s position. ? For swimmer’s positioning an angle of more than 10° is optimal.     

Correction to: Quality use of diagnostic imaging in trauma,and the impact on emergency medical practice—a retrospective clinical audit

Emergency Radiology - A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-021-01926-1     

Diagnosis of temporomandibular dysfunction syndrome—image quality at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging

The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in expert ratings of quality of magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the temporomandibular joint in 24 patients with suspected anterior disc displacement examined in randomized order at 1.5 and 3.0 T. Parasagittal (closed and opened mouth) and paracoronal sections were performed with a surface coil. Two experienced examiners blinded to patient status and type of MRI diagnosed the images according to position of condyle, position and changes in the signal, and disc shape. In addition, perceptibility of position and disc shape were assessed. A highly significant difference in the perceptibility of disc shape (P < 0.001) and position (P < 0.001) was obtained. With comparable examination sequences and identical resolution, the 3.0 T MRI of the temporomandibular joint increases the perceptibility of joint structures.     

Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy?

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the effect of single- versus two-segment image reconstruction on image quality and diagnostic accuracy at 64-section multidetector computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography by using conventional coronary angiography as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study design was approved by a human research committee; patients gave informed consent. The study was HIPAA compliant. Forty consecutive patients (22 men, 18 women; mean age, 61 years +/- 8 [standard deviation]) underwent both 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography and conventional angiography. All data sets were reconstructed by using single- and two-segment image reconstruction algorithms, with resulting temporal resolution of 82.5-165 msec. Two experienced observers independently evaluated image quality and signs of coronary artery disease. A five-level grading scheme was used to grade stenosis (0%, <50%, <70%, <99%, 100%) and image quality (1[unacceptable] to 5[excellent]). Interobserver correlation, Spearman correlation coefficients, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. RESULTS: Six hundred coronary artery segments were visible on conventional angiograms, of which 560 (93.3%) were seen by using single-segment and 561 (93.5%) were seen by using two-segment image reconstruction (P=.35). Mean quality scores were not significantly different (P=.22) for single- (3.1 +/- 0.9) and two-segment (3.2 +/- 0.8) reconstruction. Significantly (P=.03) better image quality was observed for two-segment reconstruction only at heart rates of 80-82 beats per minute, at which temporal resolution was approximately 83 msec. For grading coronary artery stenosis, correlation was 0.64 for single- and 0.66 for two-segment reconstruction (P=.43). Significant stenosis (>50%) was detected on a per-segment basis with 77.1% sensitivity and 98.6% specificity by using single-segment and with 79.2% sensitivity and 99.1% specificity by using two-segment image reconstruction. CONCLUSION: At heart rates of more than 65 beats per minute, use of two-segment reconstruction improves image quality at multidetector CT coronary angiography but does not significantly affect overall diagnostic accuracy compared with single-segment reconstruction.     

Can a revised paediatric radiation dose reduction CT protocol be applied and still maintain anatomical delineation,diagnostic confidence and overall imaging quality?

Objective:

To compare multidetector CT (MDCT) radiation doses between default settings and a revised dose reduction protocol and to determine whether the diagnostic confidence can be maintained with imaging quality made under the revised protocol in paediatric head, chest and abdominal CT studies.

Methods:

The study retrospectively reviewed head, chest, abdominal and thoracoabdominal MDCT studies, comparing 231 CT studies taken before (Phase 1) and 195 CT studies taken after (Phase 2) the implemented revised protocol. Image quality was assessed using a five-point grading scale based on anatomical criteria, diagnostic confidence and overall quality. Image noise and dose–length product (DLP) were collected and compared.

Results:

The relative dose reductions between Phase 1 and Phase 2 were statistically significant in 35%, 51% and 54% (p < 0.001) of head, chest and abdominal CT studies, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in overall image quality score comparisons in the head (p = 0.3), chest (p = 0.7), abdominal (p = 0.7) and contiguous thoracic (p = 0.1) and abdominal (p = 0.2) CT studies, with the exception of anatomical quality in definition of bronchial walls and delineation of intrahepatic portal branches in thoracoabdominal CTs, and diagnostic confidence in mass lesion in head CTs, liver lesion (>1 cm), splanchnic venous thrombosis, pancreatitis in abdominal CTs, and emphysema and aortic dissection in thoracoabdominal CTs.

Conclusion:

Paediatric CT radiation doses can be significantly reduced from manufacturer''s default protocol while still maintaining anatomical delineation, diagnostic confidence and overall imaging quality.

Advances in knowledge:

Revised paediatric CT protocol can provide a half DLP reduction while preserving overall imaging quality.The use of CT has been rapidly increasing all over the world during the past two decades, driven by advanced technology and the invention of the multidetector CT (MDCT). Use of MDCT has risen 12-fold in the UK and 20-fold in the USA during this time, and the mean effective dose from all medical X-rays in the USA has increased 7-fold during this period.^1–3 6–11% of all CT examinations in developed countries are performed on children aged from 0 to 15 years.^2,4–6 The organ-absorbed doses reported in adult and paediatric patients undergoing single CT examination are considerably lower than the threshold for initiation of a deterministic effect and the estimated effective doses are still within the annual exposure dose from natural background radiation.⁷ The UK Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency, the US National Council on Radiological Protection and Measurement and the US National Academy of Sciences Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation committees have proposed that, for doses <100 mSv, which is roughly equal to the dose range for multiple CT examinations, the radiation-induced cancers decrease linearly with decreasing dose with no threshold or a so called “linear no-threshold” model.^3,8,9 There was a linearly increasing risk for all solid cancers with increasing radiation dose and a higher radio sensitivity in children resulting in a larger attributable lifetime cancer risk in this patient group.^1,3Although the association of diagnostic medical radiation exposures in maternal pre-natal, children''s post natal and parental pre-conception periods with paediatric cancer risks are summarized in various studies, a CT scan-related cancer risk in children and adolescents has not been definitively proven.⁶ A retrospective cohort study by Pearce et al¹⁰ did, however, find a significant association between estimated cumulative radiation doses delivered by CT scan to the bone marrow and brain and subsequent increased risk of leukaemia and brain tumours in childhood.Diagnostic reference level (DRL) values are required for CT optimization, and these values are recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection; also each region or country is responsible for and authorized to enact details and implementation of their own DRLs.¹¹ Several age-based and weight-based DRLs for paediatric CT have been published.^12–17 General strategies for CT dose reduction in paediatric healthcare include such things as avoiding a CT scan if adequate clinical information can be obtained from ultrasound or MRI, avoiding multiphase examinations and designing CT protocols to minimize exposure time.¹⁸ Nowadays, many professional societies, regulators and manufacturers have been trying innovative new technologies for reducing radiation dose while maintaining optimal image quality.Two of the most commonly used image quality parameters in diagnostic imaging are high-contrast (spatial) resolution and low-contrast resolution. Spatial resolution is the ability to distinguish small objects close to one another on an image and is influenced by various factors such as focal spot size, detector width and ray, pixel size and properties of the reconstruction filter. Low-contrast resolution refers to the visibility of an object against the background. In the absence of artefacts, the low-contrast resolution scan is affected mostly by noise.^19,20 Although noise derivative is a quality index that is more relevant to assess image quality than image noise, it is difficult to translate in clinical practice.²¹ Image noise is measured by standard deviation (SD) of CT number, and it depends on milliamperes (mA), scan time, kilovoltage peak (kVp), patient size, pitch or table speed, slice thickness and reconstruction algorithm. If the milliampere–seconds value is reduced by 50%, the radiation dose will be reduced by the same amount, with an attendant noise increase of 41%, calculated by the equation (1/√2 = 1.41, a 41% increase). Tube voltage or beam energy has a direct influence on patient radiation dose. Reducing the peak kilovoltage results in a significant decrease in radiation dose owing to the square law relationship of these two values.^{19,20,22–25} Thus, the image noise and tissue contrast will be affected by adjusting kilovoltage; however, reduced peak tube potential is useful for chest, airway and skeletal studies owing to a high contrast-to-noise ratio requirement in imaging evaluation.¹⁸In our hospital (Songklanagarind Hospital, Hat Yai, Thailand), we began a revised CT dose reduction protocol in August 2010 that involved lowering kVp and mA, and using dose–length product (DLP) and DRLs based on the Nievelstein et al²³ protocol and national dose surveys from the UK and Canada^12,15 (

Evaluation of 100 brain examinations using a 3 Tesla MR-compatible incubator—safety, handling, and image quality

Introduction

Several studies have revealed the importance of brain imaging in term and preterm infants. The aim of this retrospective study was to review safety, handling, and image quality of MR brain imaging using a new 3 Tesla MR-compatible incubator.

Methods

Between 02/2011 and 05/2012 100 brain MRIs (84 infants, mean gestational age 32.2?±?4.7 weeks, mean postmenstrual age at imaging 40.6?±?3.4 weeks) were performed using a 3 Tesla MR-compatible incubator with dedicated, compatible head coil. Seventeen examinations (13 infants, mean gestational age 35.1?±?5.4 weeks, mean postmenstrual age at imaging 47.8?±?7.4 weeks) with a standard head coil served as a control. Image analysis was performed by a neuroradiologist and a pediatric radiologist in consensus.

Results

All but two patients with known apnea were transferred to the MR unit and scanned without problems. Handling was easier and faster with the incubator; relevant motion artifacts (5.9 vs. 10.8 %) and the need for repetitive sedation (43.0 vs. 86.7 %) were reduced. Considering only images not impaired by motion artifacts, image quality (4.8?±?0.4 vs. 4.3?±?0.8, p?=?0.047) and spatial resolution (4.7?±?0.4 vs. 4.2?±?0.6, p?=?0.011) of T2-weighted images were scored significantly higher in patients imaged with the incubator. SNR increased significantly (171.6?±?54.5 vs. 80.5?±?19.8, p?<?0.001) with the use of the incubator.

Conclusion

Infants can benefit from the use of a 3 Tesla MR-compatible incubator because of its safety, easier, and faster handling (compared to standard imaging) and possibility to obtain high-quality MR images even in unstable patients.     

Pseudotumour cerebri and optic hydrops—magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic and therapeutical considerations in a paediatric case

We report the case of a 4-year-old girl with progressive visual loss. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a perioptic subarachnoidal space dilatation. In this case, a clear differentiation between pseudotumour cerebri and optic hydrops was not possible. Administration of acetazolamid, furosemid and corticosteroids did not show any success. Progressive loss of visual function was halted with ventriculo-peritoneal shunting. We discuss MRI findings, aetiology and course of the disease, and its literature.     

Myocardial tagging with steady state free precession techniques and semi-automatic postprocessing—impact on diagnostic value

Our aim was to determine the diagnostic value of myocardial tagging sequences with regard to the evaluable share of the cardiac cycle. Thirty-three patients were examined at 1.5 T using tagging sequences with gradient-echo (GRE) readout, 18 patients at 1.5 T with steady-state free precession (SSFP), and 11 patients at 3 T using GRE. Two observers graded image quality and determined the share of the cardiac cycle for which postprocessing could be performed (1, optimal; 2, little interaction; 3, whole cycle assessable; 4, diastole non-assessable; 5, systole incomplete; 6, non-diagnostic). With GRE at 1.5 T, median image quality was 4.0 (95% CI 4.0–5.0), while it was significantly better with 2.0 (2.0–3.0) using the SSFP technique and similar at 3 T with 2.9 (1.7–3.5). With GRE at 1.5 T, systole could be assessed in 69% of patients, and an evaluation of the whole cardiac cycle was not possible. With the SSFP sequence at 1.5 T and GRE at 3 T, an evaluation of the whole cardiac cycle was possible in 71% and 70% of the patients, respectively, and systole was assessable in all patients. Tagging sequences with SSFP readout at 1.5 T make a semi-automatic evaluation of the whole cardiac cycle feasible in a large share of patients.     

Dynamic breast MR imaging: is parametric mapping superior to image subtraction in lesion detection?

We compared the detection of malignant lesions in two different methods of parametric-guided analysis to the widely used early subtraction images. The parametric colour-coded overlays were defined by the increase of signal intensity after contrast injection and the course of the time signal intensity curve. Exams of 30 patients with histopathological evidence of 32 invasive breast carcinomas were evaluated. Five hundred five areas of additional enhancing tissue were found in the early subtraction images. The sensitivity was 100 in the subtraction images and 100 and 93.8 in the parametric images, respectively, the specificity 67.5, 84.2 and 88.7, respectively. On average 4.4 ROI-measurements were needed to find the highest increase of signal intensity in the subtraction series compared to 1.9 in the parametric images. Properly selected thresholds in parametric imaging may be helpful in the differentiation of enhancing tissue. Furthermore the parametric image-guided ROI selection significantly speeds up the analysis and makes it safer as a lower rate of ROI-measurements is needed to find the strongest enhancement.     

Predictive model for contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the breast: Is it feasible in malignant risk assessment of breast imaging reporting and data system 4 lesions?

AIM: To build and evaluate predictive models for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of the breast to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. METHODS: A total of 235 breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 4 solid breast lesions were imaged via CEUS before core needle biopsy or surgical resection. CEUS results were analyzed on 10 enhancing patterns to evaluate diagnostic performance of three benign and three malignant CEUS models, with pathological results used as the gold standard. A logistic regression model was developed basing on the CEUS results, and then evaluated with receiver operating curve (ROC). RESULTS: Except in cases of enhanced homogeneity, the rest of the 9 enhancement appearances were statistically significant (P < 0.05). These 9 enhancement patterns were selected in the final step of the logistic regression analysis, with diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 84.4% and 82.7%, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve of 0.911. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the malignant vs benign CEUS models were 84.38%, 87.77%, 86.38% and 86.46%, 81.29% and 83.40%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The breast CEUS models can predict risk of malignant breast lesions more accurately, decrease false-positive biopsy, and provide accurate BI-RADS classification.     

Umbilical cord entanglement’s frequency and its impact on the newborn

International Journal of Legal Medicine - Neonaticide is a serious allegation that needs a complete chain of criminal investigations. In this context, a nuchal cord is considered to be responsible...     

How does arm positioning of polytraumatized patients in the initial computed tomography (CT) affect image quality and diagnostic accuracy?

Purpose

To evaluate the influence of different arm positions on abdominal image quality during initial whole-body CT (WBCT) in polytraumatized patients and to assess the risk of missing potentially life-threatening injuries due to arm artifacts.

Materials and methods

Between July 2011 and February 2013, WBCT scans of 203 patients with arms in the abdominal area during initial WBCT were analyzed. Six different arms-down positions were defined: patients with both (group A)/one arm(s) (group B) down alongside the torso, patients with both (group C)/one arm(s) (group D) crossed in front of the upper abdomen, patients with both (group E)/one arm(s) (group F) crossed in front of the pelvic area. A group of 203 patients with elevated arms beside the head served as a control group. Two observers jointly evaluated image quality of different organ regions using a 4-point scale system. Follow-up examinations (CT scans and/or ultrasound) were analyzed to identify findings missed during initial WBCT due to reduced image quality.

Results

Image quality for most of the organ regions analyzed was found to be significantly different among all groups (p < 0.05). Image quality was most severely degraded in group A, followed by groups E and C. Positioning with one arm up resulted in significantly better image quality than both arms down (p < 0.05). Overall, arms-up positioning showed significantly better image quality than arms-down positions (p < 0.05). In one case, liver hemorrhage missed in the initial WBCT because of arm artifacts, was revealed by follow-up CT.

Conclusion

In WBCT arms-down positioning significantly degrades abdominal image quality and artifacts might even conceal potentially life-threatening injuries. If the patient's status does not allow elevation of both arms, image quality can benefit from raising at least one arm. Otherwise, arms should be placed in front of the upper abdomen instead of alongside the torso.     

Anode heel effect: Does it impact image quality in digital radiography? A systematic literature review

IntroductionThe anode heel effect can be used to optimize image quality and/or patient dose in digital radiography (DR). In film-screen radiography, the effect can equalize optical density in regions of varying attenuation. Clinical experience suggests that the implementation of DR has led to less awareness of anode orientation. Post-processing is assumed to compensate, but may also alter image impression and potentially obscure image details. Published evidence was examined for the influence of the anode heel effect on image quality in DR.MethodA systematic literature search was carried out using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Title and abstracts were screened blinded by three authors, according to in-/exclusion criteria, followed by full-text analysis for final inclusion. Studies where technical and/or visual image quality were reported, was included. All studies were analyzed and assigned quality scores, according to relevant questions. The authors devised a scoring system based on reported information pertaining to reproducibility, interpretation, and generalizability of the methods and conclusions.ResultsFive studies were included of heterogeneous design, each with methodological shortcomings. Only a few anatomical areas were covered. Very few patients were examined, and in no studies were images evaluated by radiologists or reporting radiographers. Relevant information such as post-processing, image quality criteria and analysis was insufficient in most studies, making reproduction difficult. Results were contradictory, especially concerning technical vs visual image quality.ConclusionLimited published evidence was found quantifying the influence of the anode heel effect on image quality using DR technology. More methodologically, robust studies are needed. The published evidence neither proves nor disproves the impact of the heel effect on image quality in DR.Implications for practiceBased on a systematic review, no firm recommendations for anode orientation relating to image quality in DR can be provided.     

Scatter correction on its own increases image contrast in TI-201 myocardium perfusion scintigraphy,but does it also improve diagnostic accuracy?

Poor and variable spatial resolution of the gamma camera, the movement of the heart and, above all, the inclusion of scattered photons in the acquisition data contribute to the deterioration of image contrast in 201Tl myocardium perfusion studies. Scatter correction algorithms may correct for the latter factor by removing (most of) the scattered photons from the acquisition data. METHODS: In this study we investigated the contrast changes induced by the Triple Energy Window scatter correction method (TEW) applied to clinical 201Tl myocardium perfusion studies and its influence on the reading of the images. Stress and rest studies of 30 consecutive patients were used for this study. Maximum image contrasts were measured between the myocardium and the left ventricular cavity in four mid-ventricular short axis slices, as well as between normally and abnormally perfused myocardium using bull's-eye displays of the activity within the myocardium. To assess image quality and perfusion abnormalities, an experienced nuclear medicine physician, blind to patient characteristics, visually reviewed all studies. RESULTS: In all individual measurements, the maximum contrast after scatter correction was higher than without correction (p < 0.001). The average increase in contrast between the myocardium and the left ventricular cavity was 43% and 48% for stress and rest studies respectively. The contrast within the myocardium increased by 25% and 32% respectively. After TEW, image quality was rated lower in almost half of the studies, while in only one study the quality was rated higher. In stress studies 11 additional perfusion defects were observed, with rest studies revealing 15 more defects after TEW, but this difference was not significant. Cohen's kappa indicated a moderate agreement of the image reading between studies with and without scatter correction. CONCLUSION: We conclude that image contrast improves significantly by scatter correction. However, image quality decreased as a result of an unfavorable signal-to-noise ratio. As an overall result, no significant change in the clinical outcome of the studies could be shown. Additional training of the readers may be required to obtain optimal results.