The effect of different doses of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection on corneal neovascularization

To evaluate the effects of various doses of subconjunctival bevacizumab injections in the treatment of patients with corneal neovascularization. During the 6-month-follow-up, no significant ocular or systemic adverse events were observed related to the subconjunctival bevacizumab injection. In Group 1, the total area of corneal neovascularization before injection was 14.8 ± 3.2 % of the corneal surface and 10.2 ± 2.8 % 6 months after injection (p < 0.01). The mean decrease in Group 1 was 32.0 ± 3.0 %. In Group 2, the total area of corneal neovascularization before and 6 months after the injection was 14.2 ± 2.5 and 9.8 ± 2.3 %, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean decrease in Group 2 was 31.0 ± 2.3 %. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Twenty-four eyes of 24 patients with corneal neovascularization who were treated with a subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab were included in this retrospective study. Fourteen eyes were treated with 2.5 mg/0.1 ml (Group 1), and 10 eyes were treated with 5.0 mg/0.2 ml (Group 2) of subconjunctival bevacizumab. Digital photographs of the cornea were used to determine the area of corneal neovascularization before injection and at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment. Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab is well tolerated and associated with a partial regression of corneal neovascularization. The efficacy of this treatment is not correlated to the injection dose.     

The Effect of Bevacizumab on Corneal Neovascularization in Rabbits

Purpose

To determine the efficacy of topical application and subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab in the treatment of corneal neovascularization.

Methods

Corneal neovascularization was induced with a silk suture of the corneal stroma in 12 rabbits (24 eyes). One week after suturing, four rabbits were treated with topical bevacizumab at 5 mg/mL (group A) and another four rabbits were treated with topical bevacizumab 10 mg/mL (group B) in the right eyes twice a day for two weeks. A subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab 1.25 mg/mL was done in the right eyes of four rabbits (group C). All of the left eyes (12 eyes) were used as controls. The area of corneal neovascularization was measured after one and two weeks, and the concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in corneal tissue was measured after two weeks.

Results

The neovascularized area was smaller in all treated groups than in the control group (p<0.001). Upon analysis of the neovascularized area, there was no significant difference between groups A and B. However, the mean neovascularized area of group B was significantly smaller than that of group C after two weeks of treatment (p=0.043). The histologic examination revealed fewer new corneal vessels in all treated groups than the control group. The concentration of VEGF was significantly lower in all treated groups compared to the control group (p<0.01), but no difference was shown between treated groups.

Conclusions

Topical and subconjunctival bevacizumab application may be useful in the treatment of corneal neovascularization and further study is necessary.     

Inhibition of corneal neovascularization after alkali burn: comparison of different doses of bevacizumab in monotherapy or associated with dexamethasone

Background: To compare the effects of different doses of bevacizumab with both saline and dexamethasone on inflammatory angiogenesis in the rat cornea induced by small chemical lesions. Methods: Corneal chemical cauterization was performed on 24 rats. Animals were divided randomly into six groups and received a daily subconjunctival injection for 7 days of: balanced salt solution 0.1 mL or dexamethasone phosphate 4 mg/day or bevacizumab 2.5 mg/day, 3.75 mg/day, 5.0 mg/day or bevacizumab 5.0 mg/day + dexamethasone phosphate 4 mg/day. Clinical examination under slit lamp was performed daily for 7 days to evaluate corneal opacity and vessel size evolution. Computer‐assisted quantitative image analysis was used to measure the total corneal area covered by neovascularization. Results: At final examination, the dexamethasone, bevacizumab 5.0 mg/day and dexamethasone + bevacizumab groups showed a significant lowering in corneal opacity score as compared with control (P = 0.024, P = 0.006 and P = 0.013, respectively). Also, a significant reduction on new vessels size score was observed. Surface of corneal neovascularization was significantly reduced in dexamethasone, bevacizumab 5.0 mg/day and dexamethasone + bevacizumab groups compared with control (P = 0.045, P = 0.047 and P = 0.044, respectively). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the ability of a 5.0 mg/day bevacizumab subconjunctival injection, in monotherapy or associated with dexamethasone, to cause a short‐term involution of corneal neovascularization after corneal alkali burn. Combination of both of these treatments may have advantages to monotherapy approaches.     

Comparison of subconjunctivally injected bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib for inhibition of corneal neovascularization in a rat model

AIM:To compare the efficacies of subconjunctival bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib sodium injections for the inhibition of corneal neovascularization in an experimental rat model. METHODS:Sixteen corneas of 16 rats were chemically cauterized and randomized into four groups:bevacizumab group that treated with 0.05mL/1.25mg bevacizumab, ranibizumab group that treated with 0.05mL/0.5mg ranibizumab, pegaptanib group that treated with 0.05mL/0.15mg pegaptanib sodium, and control group that treated with 0.05mL saline solution. Digital photographs of the corneas were taken and analyzed using an image analysis software program. All corneas were excised and examined histologically on the 15^th day. RESULTS: Each treatment group had significantly less neovascularized corneal areas and fewer blood vessels than the control group (all P<0.05). In addition, bevacizumab group had significantly less neovascularized corneal areas and fewer blood vessels than ranibizumab and pegaptanib groups (both P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the ranibizumab and pegaptanib groups regarding percentage of neovascularized corneal areas and number of blood vessels (both P>0.05). CONCLUSION:Subconjunctival bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib sodium were effective with no corneal epitheliopathy for inhibiting corneal neovascularization after corneal burn in rats. Bevacizumab was more effective than ranibizumab and pegaptanib sodium.     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab for corneal neovascularization

Acta Ophthalmol. 2010: 88: 868–871

Abstract.

Purpose: This work aimed to study and evaluate the effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection in patients with corneal neovascularization (CNV) resulting from different ocular surface disorders. Methods: Ten eyes with CNV caused by different ocular surface disorders were studied. All eyes had both major and minor vessel CNV caused by factors such as healed corneal ulcers, long‐standing chronic inflammatory diseases and corneal ischaemia (caused by contact lenses). All eyes received a single subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg (0.1 ml) bevacizumab. Morphological changes in the major and minor vessels were evaluated using slit‐lamp biomicroscopy and corneal photography. Results: Conspicuous recession of the minor vessels of CNV was observed in all eyes at 2 weeks post‐injection. The extent of CNV of the major vessels was significantly decreased at 2 weeks post‐injection. The level of CNV continued to decrease noticeably for 3 months and then stabilized for the remainder of the 6‐month follow‐up period. Parameters used for evaluation included the total area of CNV, which amounted to 14.0 ± 5.4% of the corneal surface pre‐injection, compared with 9.4 ± 3.9% post‐injection (p < 0.01), reflecting a mean decrease in CNV of 33 ± 8%, and the extent of neovascularization, which decreased from 4.3 ± 1.5 clock hours pre‐injection to 2.4 ± 1.1 clock hours post‐injection (p < 0.01). During the 6‐month follow‐up, none of the 10 eyes showed any complication that could be related to subconjunctival bevacizumab injection. Conclusions: Bevacizumab can be used safely and effectively for CNV resulting from different ocular surface disorders. It represents an effective treatment for minor vessel neovascularization caused by long‐standing chronic inflammation (e.g. trachoma) or long‐standing corneal ischaemia (e.g. contact lenses), as well as for major vessel neovascularization resulting from different causes. Bevacizumab was well tolerated over the 6‐month follow‐up period.     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab for corneal neovascularization

Objective To report the efficacy of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection in patients with corneal neovascularization (NV). Methods This retrospective interventional case study included two eyes of two patients with corneal NV due to aqueous-deficient dry eye with filamentary keratitis in the first case, and corneal graft failure in the second case. Patients received a subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg (0.1 ml) bevacizumab. Morphologic changes were investigated by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and corneal photography. Results Corneal NV was dramatically regressed a week after injection in the first case. In the second case, minor vessels were regressed while the major one did not. No infection or inflammation was observed. No relapse was seen within the follow-up of two to three months. Conclusion Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab may offer an additional strategy for the treatment of corneal NV.     

Inhibitory effects of bevacizumab on angiogenesis and corneal neovascularization

Background

To evaluate the inhibitory effects of bevacizumab (Avastin®) on angiogenesis using cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in vitro and on corneal neovascularization by subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab in vivo.

Methods

After the HUVECs were exposed to different concentrations of bevacizumab stimulated with VEGF (10 ng/ml) for 2, 6, and 24 hours, cellular-activity-like proliferation, migration and tube formation were assessed. Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 ml) was performed after corneal chemical burn injury. Then the cornea was evaluated by biomicroscopy, fluorescein angiography, and light microscopy.

Results

The inhibitory effects of bevacizumab on VEGF-induced HUVECs proliferation showed a dose-dependent response for 2 and 6 hours, but all groups were effectively inhibited regardless of the concentration of bevacizumab for 24 hours. The inhibitory effects of bevacizumab on the migration of VEGF-induced HUVECs showed a time- and dose-dependent response. The inhibitory effects of bevacizumab on VEGF-induced HUVECs tube formation showed a dose-dependent response only for 24 hours. On days 3 and 8 after the subconjunctival injection, bevacizumab-treated eyes showed less neovascular growth than BSS-treated eyes in biomicroscopic, fluorescein angiographic, and light microscopic findings in vivo.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab effectively inhibits angiogenesis and corneal neovascularization, and could be used as a inhibitor of corneal neovascularization in the future.

     

贝伐单抗联合曲安奈德治疗穿透性角膜移植术后新生血管

目的：观察球结膜下注射贝伐单抗和曲安奈德治疗穿透性角膜移植术后新生血管的临床疗效。
　　方法：对19例20眼因眼外伤行穿透性角膜移植术后3mo,新生血管增生达到Ⅲ度以上患眼随机分为四组。 A组：对照组;B组：贝伐单抗2.5mg(0.1mL);C组：贝伐单抗及曲安奈德各0.1mL;D 组：曲安奈德0.1mL;每月1次,共两次球结膜下注射药物。
　　结果：平均随访3a,B组和C组视力保持稳定或稍有增进,新生血管和免疫反应明显减退(P<0.01),患者眼痛、畏光流泪症状减轻。
　　结论：贝伐单抗联合曲安奈德在治疗穿透性角膜移植术后新生血管的过程中能够有效减退新生血管,并减轻排斥反应,对保持植片的透明性有积极的治疗作用。     

Bevacizumab inhibits corneal neovascularization in an alkali burn induced model of corneal angiogenesis

BACKGROUND: New and uncontrolled blood vessel development in the cornea is a pivotal process in the pathogenesis of several corneal diseases. These corneal diseases may finally cause blindness and managing them therapeutically is problematic. The data supporting a causal role for vascular endothelial growth factor in corneal neovascularization are extensive. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) on experimental corneal neovascularization in rabbits. METHODS: Chemical cauterization of the cornea was performed by touching central cornea with a 5-mm-diameter NaOH-soaked cotton applicator for 10 s in 20 eyes of 20 White New Zealand rabbits. The rabbits were then divided randomly into two equal groups. Bevacizumab (2.5 mg) was administered to 10 eyes (group 1) by a subconjunctival injection immediately after chemical cauterization of corneal surface. As a control, 10 eyes (group 2) received an injection of distilled water. Rabbits were examined daily for detection of the first signs of neovascularization. Three weeks later, the extent of corneal neovascularization was evaluated by direct examination and photograph analyses. Total corneal neovascularization area, degree of circumference involved and longest neovascular pedicle length were assessed. RESULTS: Bevacizumab significantly decreased the total neovascularization area (P < 0.009), the circumference involved (P < 0.011) and the longest neovascular pedicle length (P < 0.023). CONCLUSION: Local injection of bevacizumab has a significant effect on inhibition of alkali burn-induced corneal neovascularization. This shows the potential value of bevacizumab in the treatment of corneal neovascularization.     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab in the impending recurrent pterygia

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection(s) in the treatment of impending recurrent pterygia. Twenty-three eyes of 23 patients who developed impending recurrence after pterygium surgery with conjunctival autografting and were treated with subconjunctival bevacizumab injection(s) (2.5 mg/0.1 mL) were included in the study. Anterior segment photographs were taken prior to and at 1 week, 1, 3 and 6 months after the injection, and at the end of the follow-up period. Image analysis was performed using an image processing and analysis software program. Recurrence rate and complications were recorded. The mean age and follow-up time of the patients were 51.2 ± 6.2 (31–60 years) and 16.8 ± 3.1 (12–22 months), respectively. The average number of injections was 2 ± 0.78 (1–3). Sixteen eyes required re-injection (two injections in nine eyes, three injections in seven eyes), due to progression of vascularization. There were significant differences between size percentage of lesions before injection and at 1 week, 1, 3 and 6 months after the injection (p < 0.05 for all). Corneal recurrence developed in only one patient and no ocular or systemic side-effects of bevacizumab were observed. Repeated injections of bevacizumab may help to prevent the high recurrence rate of residual impending pterygium, due to its adjuvant role in decreasing lesion size, especially in the first year after surgery.     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab injection for corneal neovascularization

PURPOSE: To report on the clinical use of subconjunctival bevacizumab in patients with corneal neovascularization. METHODS: The charts of 10 consecutive patients with corneal neovascularization who received subconjunctival injections of bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 mL) were reviewed. Digital photographs of the cornea were graded by 2 masked observers for density, extent, and centricity of corneal vascularization. Image analysis was used to determine the area of cornea covered by neovascularization as a percentage of the total corneal area. RESULTS: No significant ocular or systemic adverse events were observed during 3.5 +/- 1.1 months of follow-up. Seven patients showed partial regression of vessels. The extent decreased from 6.0 +/- 1.2 (SD) clock hours before the injection to 4.6 +/- 1.0 clock hours after bevacizumab injection (P = 0.008). Density decreased from 2.7 +/- 0.2 to 1.9 +/- 0.3, respectively. (P = 0.007). No change was noticed in the centricity of corneal vessels. Corneal neovascularization covered, on average, 14.8% +/- 2.5% (SD) of the corneal surface before the injections, compared with 10.5% +/- 2.8% (P = 0.36, t test) after bevacizumab injection. Therefore, bevacizumab decreased corneal neovascularization by 29%. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term results suggest that subconjunctival bevacizumab is well tolerated and associated with a partial regression of corneal neovascularization.     

Corneal endothelial safety following subconjunctival and intrastromal injection of bevacizumab for corneal neovascularization

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect on endothelial cell density and morphology of combined subconjunctival and intracorneal injection of bevacizumab for the treatment of corneal neovascularization (NV). The charts and specular microscopy images of ten consecutive patients with corneal NV, who received combined subconjunctival+intracorneal injections of bevacizumab were reviewed. Patients received three injections of bevacizumab 25 mg/mL (1.25 mg/0.05 mL subconjunctival and 1.25 mg/0.05 mL intrastromal) 4–6 weeks apart. Endothelial cell counts (ECCs) and morphological changes were assessed by non-contact specular microscopy performed at baseline, 1 month after each injection and at 3 and 6 months after the last injection. There were no significant changes in ECCs (p = 0.663), coefficient of variation (p = 0.076), percentage of hexagonal cells (p = 0.931) or mean corneal thickness (p = 0.462) from pre-injection values to the 6-month follow-up values. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. In our series, the use of combined subconjunctival and intracorneal bevacizumab did not cause any decrease in ECCs or morphological alterations up to 6 months after the last of three injections. Further studies are required to confirm long-term safety in a larger sample population with longer follow-up, as well as the ideal dose, route of administration and frequency of bevacizumab administration.     

Inhibition of experimental corneal neovascularization by using subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab (Avastin)

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) administration on corneal neovascularization (NV) in rabbits. METHODS: NV was induced by placing a suture at the corneal periphery of the right eye of 20 rabbits. Immediately after suturing and again 1 week later, rabbits were divided into 2 groups and administered a subconjunctival injection of normal saline (control) or bevacizumab (Avastin; 5 mg/0.2 mL), respectively. On day 14, digital photographs of the cornea were taken and analyzed to determine the area of the cornea covered by NV. In addition, immunohistochemical analysis was used to determine CD31 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in corneal tissue. RESULTS: Analysis of digital photographs showed that there was less corneal NV in bevacizumab-treated eyes than in controls (P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). In addition, there was less staining for VEGF and CD31 in corneas from bevacizumab-treated eyes than in control eyes. Subconjunctival bevacizumab injections were not associated with any complications during observation. CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival bevacizumab administration decreased suture-induced corneal neovascularization in rabbits.     

Avastin use in high risk corneal transplantation

Background

Corneal neovascularization is a major risk factor for graft failure after corneal transplantation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of subconjunctival, perilimbal, and/or intrastromal bevacizumab (Avastin®) on corneal neovascularization in patients with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).

Methods

Fourteen eyes of 14 patients with high risk corneal transplantation and corneal neovascularization after PKP (nine men and five women with a mean age of 63 years) were included in this non-comparative interventional case series. Indications for PKP were: vascularized leucomas after herpetic keratitis and chemical burn, advanced pseudophakic bullous keratopathy with superficial and deep corneal vascularization, keratoconus, severe infection in hereditary corneal dystrophy, and failed corneal grafts. Subconjunctival, perilimbal, and/or intrastromal bevacizumab of dose of 2.5 mg/ 0.1 ml/ per affected quadrant was injected at the site of neovascularization in each patient at the end of surgery and/or at follow up visits. One or two injections were applied. At each visit a full eye examination with photo documentation was performed. Follow-up period was 2 to 8 months (mean 7.1 months).

Results

Decrease of corneal neovascularization was observed in eleven patients (78.6%). Regression of neovascularization with fading of small vessels was demonstrated. Despite high- risk patient pool, twelve grafts (85.7%) remained transparent for the period of observation, and patients maintained good visual acuity. In two patients with initial graft rejection and vascularization, subconjunctival and perilimbal application of bevacizumab was beneficial in overcoming the corneal inflammation and initial rejection. No adverse reactions have been detected to date in patients with subconjunctival, perilimbal, and/or intrastromal injection of bevacizumab.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab is an efficient and safe additional treatment option for improvement of prognosis in high-risk corneal transplantation with pre- and postoperative corneal neovascularization.

     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab for vascularized rejected corneal grafts

We describe 3 patients who experienced corneal neovascularization following keratoplasty and were treated with a single subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg bevacizumab. Although there was immediate regression of the corneal vascularization and haze, as well as improvement in the anterior chamber reaction, the effects were short-lived and starting from the second week, the corneal vessels began to progress. All 3 cases ended in permanent graft failure. The series suggests a possible role for bevacizumab in the management of graft rejection with vascularization.     

结膜下注射贝伐单抗对兔角膜新生血管的抑制作用

目的 观察碱烧伤后不同时间结膜下注射贝伐单抗（Bevacizumab）角膜新生血管（CNV）的形成与转归.方法 新西兰白兔54只,制成单眼碱烧伤模型,随机分为3组,每组18只眼,A组碱烧伤后结膜下立即注射贝伐单抗2.5 mg（0.1 ml）,B组碱烧伤后3d结膜下注射贝伐单抗2.5 mg（0.1 ml）,C组结膜下注射生理盐水0.1ml,为对照组.共观察28 d.裂隙灯显微镜下观察角膜新生血管生长情况,行眼前段照相并计算其面积,伤后7、14、28 d各组随机取6例角膜行共焦显微镜检查,观察角膜组织炎性细胞浸润情况及角膜新生血管形态学变化.结果 A、B及C组角膜新生血管开始出现的时间分别为（5.9＋0.8）d、（3.5＋0.6）d及（3.4＋1.1）d,其中A组明显较C组延长（P＜0.05）,B组与C组差异无统计学意义（P =0.068）.伤后各时间点A、B组角膜新生血管的生长面积均明显较C组减少（P＜0.05）,A组与B组角膜新生血管面积比较,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.共焦显微镜检查可见C组烧伤区大量炎性细胞浸润及新生血管形成,而A组角膜炎性细胞较少,烧伤区无新生血管形成,B组见少量新生血管侵入烧伤区.3组基质层均可见纤维及瘢痕组织增生,其中治疗组纤维增生程度与瘢痕组织均较对照组轻.结论 结膜下注射贝伐单抗可抑制角膜炎性细胞形成,改善损伤角膜基质,促进角膜愈合,从而减少碱烧伤引起的角膜新生血管的生长,在早期注射能取得更好的疗效.     

Effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) on experimental corneal neovascularization in guinea pigs

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) on experimental corneal neovascularization in guinea pigs. METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 guinea pigs were chemically cauterized with 75% silver nitrate and 25% potassium nitrate sticks. Fifteen eyes (group 1) received 2 subconjunctival injections of bevacizumab (0.1 mL, 1.25 mg) simultaneously with cauterization and 3 days later. Fifteen eyes (group 2) received 2 subconjunctival injections of bevacizumab (0.1 mL, 1.25 mg) 3 and 5 days after cauterization. Ten eyes (group 3, control group) received 2 subconjunctival injections of 0.1 mL of balanced salt solution 3 and 5 days after cauterization. After we determined the burn and neovascularization scores for all groups, the animals were killed on the 10th day. The percentages of neovascularization on the surface of the cornea were measured in terms of pixels on digital photographs. The average number of vessels at maximally vascularized areas was determined for each specimen. RESULTS: Neovascularization score was 1.1 +/- 0.3 in group 1, 2.46 +/- 1.3 in group 2, and 3.5 +/- 0.5 in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The area of neovascularization at the cornea surface was 15.6% +/- 10.1% in group 1, 19.74% +/- 11.2% in group 2, and 23.5% +/- 7.4% in the control group (P = 0.194). The average number of neovascular vessels at group 1 was significantly reduced in comparison with group 2 and the control group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab decreases the extent of chemically induced corneal neovascularization in guinea pigs. The antineovascular effect of bevacizumab is higher if the injection is performed simultaneously with the chemical cauterization.     

Bevacizumab (Avastin) eye drops inhibit corneal neovascularization

Background To analyze the ability of bevacizumab (Avastin) eye drops to inhibit corneal neovascularization. Design: interventional case series involving five patients (age: 42 ± 14 years). Methods Patients with aggressive corneal neovascularisation not responding to conventional therapy were treated with bevacizumab (Avastin) eye drops (5x/day; 5 mg/ml) for 0.5 to 6 months (mean: 3.6 ± 2; four patients with limbal stem cell deficiency [three due to chemical burns and one inherited] and one after perforating keratoplasty). Results Bevacizumab eye drops were well tolerated without obvious corneal side-effects. All five patients showed a reduction in the neovascularized area (decrease 48 ± 28%; 13–75%). Conclusions Bevacizumab eye drops seem to inhibit corneal neovascularization without obvious corneal epithelial side-effects.     

The Effect of Bevacizumab versus Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Corneal Neovascularization: A Preliminary Study

Purpose

To compare the short term effects of bevacizumab and ranibizumab injections on the regression of corneal neovascularization (NV).

Methods

Sixteen eyes of 16 patients with corneal NV were randomly assigned for an injection with 2.5 mg of bevacizumab (group 1, n = 8) or 1 mg of ranibizumab (group 2, n = 8) through subconjunctival and intrastromal routes. The patients were prospectively followed-up for one month after the injections. Corneal NV areas, as shown on corneal slit-lamp photographs stored in JPEG format, were calculated using Image J software before the injection, one week after the injection, and one month after the injection. The corneal NV areas were compared before and after the injections.

Results

Seven women and nine men, with an average age of 51 years, presented with corneal NV secondary to herpetic keratitis (7 cases), graft rejection (6), chemical burn (1), pemphigoid (1), and recurrent ulcer (1). In group I, the preoperative corneal NV area (8.75 ± 4.33%) was significantly decreased to 5.62 ± 3.86% one week after the injection and to 6.35 ± 3.02% one month after the injection (p = 0.012, 0.012, respectively). The corneal NV area in group 2 also exhibited a significant change, from 7.37 ± 4.33% to 6.72 ± 4.16% one week after the injection (p = 0.012). However, no significant change was observed one month after the injection. The mean decrease in corneal NV area one month after injection in group 1 (28.4 ± 9.01%) was significantly higher than in group 2 (4.51 ± 11.64%, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Bevacizumab injection resulted in a more effective and stable regression of corneal NV compared to the ranibizumab injection. The potency and dose of these two drugs for the regression of corneal NV require further investigation.     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab injection for corneal neovascularization in recurrent pterygium

PURPOSE: We report on the use of subconjunctival bevacizumab on corneal vessel density in recurrent pterygia. METHODS: The charts of 5 patients with recurrent pterygium, who received subconjunctival injections of bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 ml) were retrospectively reviewed. Ophthalmic evaluation included Snellen visual acuity (VA), tonometry and complete examination before the injection and at 1 week and 1 and 3 months thereafter. Digital photographs of the eyes were analyzed by image analysis software to determine the area of cornea covered by new vessels as a percentage of the total corneal area. RESULTS: No ocular or systemic adverse events were observed. No change in visual acuity was noted in any patient following the injection. The mean change in corneal vascularization after one bevacizumab injection was 0.03%+/-0.45, while after two injections the change was 0.025%+/-0.19 (both not statistically different than zero, t-test). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term results suggest that subconjunctival bevacizumab is well tolerated but does not cause regression of corneal vessels in recurrent pterygium.