Rizatriptan, a novel 5-HT1B/1D agonist for migraine: single- and multiple-dose tolerability and pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects

Rizatriptan is a novel 5-HT1D/1B agonist for relief of migraine headache. The pharmacokinetics, metabolite profiles, and tolerability of rizatriptan were examined in a multiple-dose study in healthy subjects. Rizatriptan (N = 24) (or placebo, N = 12) was administered as a single 10 mg dose, followed 48 hours later by administration of one 10 mg dose every 2 hours for three doses on 4 consecutive days, corresponding to the maximum daily dose for a migraine attack. The AUC of rizatriptan and its active N-monodesmethyl metabolite after three 10 mg doses was approximately threefold greater than the plasma concentrations following a single 10 mg dose. Metabolite profiles were similar after single and multiple doses. Adverse events during rizatriptan were mild and transient; similar events occurred during placebo, with a somewhat reduced incidence. Diastolic blood pressure tended to increase compared with placebo (approximately 5 mmHg), particularly on the first multiple-dose day (p < .01 vs. placebo). In conclusion, rizatriptan is well tolerated by healthy subjects during multiple-dose administration, with no unexpected accumulation of drug in plasma.     

Efficacy and safety of rofecoxib 12.5 mg and celecoxib 200 mg in two similarly designed osteoarthritis studies

OBJECTIVE: To compare the lower osteoarthritis (OA) dose of rofecoxib to the recommended dose of celecoxib in two identically designed studies. METHODS: Patients with knee OA were randomized (2:2:1 ratio: rofecoxib 12.5 mg once daily (qd), celecoxib 200 mg qd, or placebo, respectively). The primary endpoint was patient global assessment of response to therapy (PGART) averaged over 6 weeks on a five-point scale. Rofecoxib would be declared at least as effective as celecoxib if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for difference in means was no lower than -0.5. Additional endpoints included Pain and Physical Function subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) OA Index. Adverse experiences (AEs) were recorded and combined from the two studies for analysis. RESULTS: Study 1 enrolled 395 patients (rofecoxib, n = 160; celecoxib, n = 157; placebo, n = 78). Study 2 enrolled 413 patients (rofecoxib, n = 159; celecoxib, n = 169; placebo, n = 85). Rofecoxib 12.5 mg was at least as effective as celecoxib 200 mg by PGART (Study 1 difference -0.09 [95% CI: -0.32, 0.14] and Study 2 difference 0.02 [95% CI: -0.20, 0.24]), and both were significantly (p < 0.001) more effective than placebo. Comparable efficacy was also seen for WOMAC Pain and Physical Function subscales with the active treatments. There was a significantly higher (p < 0.05) incidence of serious AEs with celecoxib than rofecoxib or placebo, none of which was drug-related. There were no significant differences in the pre-specified measurements of safety including drug-related AEs or discontinuations due to AEs, and the medications demonstrated similar safety as assessed by spontaneous reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Rofecoxib 12.5 mg and celecoxib 200 mg provided comparable efficacy over 6 weeks, and both were significantly more efficacious than placebo. The medications demonstrated similar safety compared to one another and placebo. The primary limitations of these studies were that they were only 6 weeks long and were powered for efficacy. Therefore, conclusions about long-term safety cannot be inferred.     

The safety of green tea extract supplementation in postmenopausal women at risk for breast cancer: results of the Minnesota Green Tea Trial

Green tea is thought to provide health benefits, though adverse reactions to green tea extract (GTE) have been reported. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of GTE on breast cancer biomarkers, including mammographic density, in which 1075 postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to consume GTE containing 843 mg (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) or placebo daily for one year. There were no significant differences in % of women with adverse events (AEs, 75.6% and 72.8% of the GTE group and placebo group, respectively) or serious AEs (2.2 % and 1.5% of GTE and placebo groups, respectively). Women on GTE reported significantly higher incidence of nausea (P < 0.001) and dermatologic AEs (P = 0.05) and significantly lower diarrhea incidence (P = 0.02). More women in the GTE group experienced an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation compared with placebo group (n = 36, (6.7%) vs. n = 4, (0.7%); P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in frequencies of other AEs. Overall, AEs were mainly mild and transient, indicating that daily consumption of GTE containing 843 mg EGCG is generally well tolerated by a group of predominantly Caucasian postmenopausal women. However, 6.7% of GTE consumers experienced ALT elevations, with 1.3% experiencing ALT-related serious AEs.     

Efficacy and tolerability of twice-daily pregabalin for treating pain and related sleep interference in postherpetic neuralgia: a 13-week, randomized trial

OBJECTIVE: This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of pregabalin dosed twice daily (BID) for relief of neuro-pathic pain associated with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The 13-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized 370 patients with PHN to pregabalin (150, 300, or 600 mg/day BID) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary efficacy measure was endpoint mean pain score from daily pain diaries. Secondary efficacy measures included endpoint mean sleep-interference score from daily sleep diaries and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Safety evaluations included adverse events (AEs), physical and neurologic examinations, 12-lead ECG, vital signs, and laboratory testing. RESULTS: Pregabalin provided significant, dose-proportional pain relief at endpoint: difference from placebo in mean pain score, 150 mg/day, -0.88, p = 0.0077; 300 mg/day, -1.07, p = 0.0016; 600 mg/day, -1.79, p = 0.0003. Weekly mean pain scores significantly improved as early as week 1. Sleep interference in all pregabalin groups was also significantly improved at endpoint, compared with placebo (p < 0.001), beginning at week 1 (p < 0.01). At study termination, patients in the 150 (p = 0.02) and 600 mg/day (p = 0.003) groups were more likely to report global improvement than were those in the placebo group.Most AEs were mild or moderate. Among pregabalin-treated patients, 13.5% withdrew due to AEs, most commonly for dizziness (16 patients, 5.8%), somnolence (8, 2.9%), or ataxia (7, 2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin, dosed BID, reduced neuropathic pain associated with PHN and was well tolerated. It also reduced the extent to which pain interfered with sleep. Pregabalin's effects were seen as early as week 1 and were sustained throughout the 13-week study.     

The efficacy of tadalafil in improving sexual satisfaction and overall satisfaction in men with mild, moderate, and severe erectile dysfunction: a retrospective pooled analysis of data from randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Satisfaction with the sexual experience is considered important when evaluating the impact of treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED), yet satisfaction has been infrequently assessed in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate satisfaction with, and enjoyment of, the sexual experience in men with ED enrolled in 11 placebo-controlled clinical trials of tadalafil. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective pooled analysis of data from 11 randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of tadalafil. Men with mild (N = 838), moderate (N = 558), or severe (N = 703) ED who were randomized to tadalafil 10 mg or 20 mg or placebo taken as needed for 12 weeks were included in this analysis. Efficacy measures included the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Reported herein are the scores on the IIEF overall satisfaction domain and individual IIEF questions (IIEF-Q7, satisfaction with intercourse; and IIEF-Q8, enjoyment of intercourse). RESULTS: At least moderate satisfaction (IIEF overall satisfaction domain) was reported by 55% and 72% of patients with mild ED taking tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg, respectively, compared with 33% taking placebo (p < 0.002); 60% and 65% vs. 19% of patients with moderate ED (p < 0.001); and 32% and 49% vs. 9% with severe ED (p < 0.001). Satisfactory intercourse during most attempts or almost always/always (IIEF-Q7) was reported by 59% and 79% of patients with mild ED taking tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg vs. 32% taking placebo (p < 0.001); 52% and 65% vs. 18% with moderate ED (p < 0.001); and 28% and 49% vs. 5% with severe ED (p < 0.001). Highly or very highly enjoyable intercourse (IIEF-Q8) was reported by 45% and 63% of patients with mild ED taking tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg vs. 21% taking placebo (p < 0.001); 43% and 56% vs. 16% with moderate ED (p < 0.001); and 19% and 44% vs. 5% with severe ED (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg improved overall satisfaction with the sexual experience, intercourse satisfaction, and intercourse enjoyment in men with mild, moderate, and severe ED.     

The Safety and Tolerability Profile of Vilazodone,A Novel Antidepressant for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

Objective

Vilazodone is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and 5-HT_1A receptor partial agonist approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). This report summarizes the safety and tolerability of vilazodone 40 mg/day during short- and long-term treatment of adult MDD.

Methods

Pooled data from two 8-week, double-blind studies of vilazodone (n = 436) vs placebo (n = 433) and data from one 52-week, open-label study (n = 616, vilazodone only) were analyzed. Patients aged 18-70 with DSM-IV-TR-defined MDD received vilazodone or placebo (8-week studies only) once daily, with food, titrated to 40 mg/day over 2 weeks. Safety and tolerability assessments included adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiograms, and weight.

Results

The most common AEs in all studies were diarrhea, nausea, and headache. Vilazodone-associated AEs in the two 8-week studies, defined as an incidence rate of ≥5% in the vilazodone group and at least twice that for placebo, were diarrhea (28.0% vs 9.2%), nausea (23.4% vs 5.1%), and insomnia (6.0% vs 2.1%), with the majority reported as mild to moderate and <5% of those patients requiring concomitant (directed) treatment for these conditions. Discontinuation rates due to AEs were 7.1% (vilazodone) and 3.2% (placebo) in the 8-week studies and 20.7% in the 52-week study. Vilazodone had no clinically significant effects on vital signs, laboratory tests, or electrocardiograms.

Conclusion

Vilazodone 40 mg/day was well tolerated during short- and long-term MDD treatment in these trials. Safety profiles associated with 8- and 52-week exposure were consistent.     

Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of inhaled bimosiamose disodium in healthy males

AIMS: The aim of these first-in-human studies was to investigate the tolerability and the pharmacokinetics of bimosiamose disodium (TBC1269Z) administered by inhalation. METHODS: Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase I trials were performed in healthy males. In a single-dose escalating study 48 subjects received doses of 2-140 mg bimosiamose disodium by inhalation and in a multiple-dose study 32 subjects received 8-70 mg bimosiamose disodium twice daily. In both studies 4 ml of the drug solution was administered via nebulizer over 15 min. Adverse events, vital signs, ECG, clinical laboratory parameters and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) data were recorded and nasopharyngeal examinations were performed to address the safety and tolerability. Blood was collected for the determination of plasma concentrations of bimosiamose. RESULTS: All subjects completed the study. No deaths or severe adverse events occurred. Eleven mild adverse events occurred in the dose-escalation study and 34 in the multiple-dose study after inhalation of bimosiamose disodium. Adverse events were more frequent at the highest dose (140 mg) of the dose-escalation study. For placebo treatment one moderate adverse event was observed in the dose-escalation study after placebo treatment, eight mild and three moderate adverse events occurred in the multiple-dose study. Bimosiamose was detected in plasma (maximum concentration 64 ng ml(-1)) only at doses > or =50 mg given twice daily and 105 mg once daily. For the highest dose a median value of 5746 h ng ml(-1) was determined for the AUC over the entire period of treatment of the multiple-dose study. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that single and multiple inhalation of bimosiamose disodium up to 70 mg is well tolerated in healthy males. Systemic bioavailability after inhalation is low.     

Efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release for the management of chronic low back pain: results of a prospective,randomized, double-blind,placebo- and active-controlled Phase III study

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release (ER) for the management of moderate to severe chronic low back pain.

Research design: Patients (N = 981) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive tapentadol ER 100 – 250 mg b.i.d., oxycodone HCl controlled release (CR) 20 – 50 mg b.i.d., or placebo over 15 weeks (3-week titration period, 12-week maintenance period).

Main outcome measures: Efficacy was assessed as change from baseline in average pain intensity (11-point NRS) at week 12 of the maintenance period and throughout the maintenance period; last observation carried forward was used to impute missing pain scores. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study.

Results: Tapentadol ER significantly reduced average pain intensity versus placebo at week 12 (least squares mean difference vs placebo [95% confidence interval], ?0.8 [?1.22, ?0.47]; p < 0.001) and throughout the maintenance period (?0.7 [?1.06,?0.35]; p < 0.001). Oxycodone CR significantly reduced average pain intensity versus placebo at week 12 (?0.9 [?1.24,?0.49]; p < 0.001) and throughout the maintenance period (?0.8 [?1.16,?0.46]; p < 0.001). Tapentadol ER was associated with a lower incidence of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) than oxycodone CR. Gastrointestinal TEAEs, including constipation, nausea, and vomiting, were among the most commonly reported TEAEs (placebo, 26.3%; tapentadol ER, 43.7%; oxycodone CR, 61.9%). The odds of experiencing constipation or the composite of nausea and/or vomiting were significantly lower with tapentadol ER than with oxycodone CR (both p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Tapentadol ER (100 – 250 mg b.i.d.) effectively relieved moderate to severe chronic low back pain over 15 weeks and had better gastrointestinal tolerability than oxycodone HCl CR (20 – 50 mg b.i.d.).     

安纳拉唑钠肠溶片在健康受试者中多次给药的药代动力学、药效学和耐受性研究

目的 研究安纳拉唑钠肠溶片60,80或100 mg连续给药在健康受试者中的药代动力学、药效学和安全耐受性.方法 采用随机、双盲双模拟、安慰剂和阳性药对照的试验设计,共计纳入45例中国健康受试者.各剂量组中10例受试者服用试验药物(安纳拉唑钠肠溶片60,80或100 mg),2例受试者服用阳性对照药(雷贝拉唑钠肠溶片20...     

Short-term acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) use for pain, fever, or colds - gastrointestinal adverse effects: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Background and Aim: Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA [aspirin]) is a commonly used over-the-counter drug for the treatment of pain, fever, or colds, but data on the safety of this use are very limited. The aim of this study was to provide data on the safety of this treatment pattern, which is of interest to clinicians, regulators, and the public.Methods: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from 67 studies sponsored by Bayer HealthCare was completed. The primary endpoints were patient-reported gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs); the secondary endpoints were the incidence of patient-reported non-GI AEs. Event incidence and odds ratios (ORs) based on Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel estimates are reported. In total, 6181 patients were treated with ASA, 3515 with placebo, 1145 with acetaminophen (paracetamol), and 754 with ibuprofen. Exposure to ASA was short term (82.5% of patients had a single dose).Results: GI AEs were more frequent with ASA (9.9%) than with placebo (9.0%) [OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1, 1.5]. Dyspeptic symptoms were infrequent (4.6% in placebo subjects). The ORs for ASA were 1.3 (95% CI 1.1, 1.6) versus placebo; 1.55 (95% CI 0.7, 3.3) versus ibuprofen; and 1.04 (95% CI 0.8, 1.4) versus acetaminophen. There were very few serious GI AEs (one ASA case; three placebo cases). No differences were found for non-GI AEs and no cases of cerebral hemorrhage were reported.Conclusion: Short-term, mostly single-dose exposure to ASA for the treatment of pain, fever, or colds was associated with a small but significant increase in the risk of dyspepsia relative to placebo.No serious GI complications were reported.     

Efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: significant placebo/practice effects in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Altered expression of central muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in hippocampal and cortical regions may contribute to the cognitive impairment exhibited in patients with schizophrenia. Increasing cholinergic activity through the use of a cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) therefore represents a possible strategy for cognitive augmentation in schizophrenia. We examined the efficacy and safety of the ChEI donepezil as cotreatment for mild to moderate cognitive impairment in schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in a prospective, 12-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study. In total, 250 patients (18-55 years) with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were clinically stabilized on risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, or aripiprazole, alone or in combination, were enrolled at 38 outpatient psychiatric clinics in the United States. Patients were randomized to donepezil 5 mg q.d. for 6 weeks then 10 mg q.d. for 6 weeks, or placebo administered as oral tablets. The primary outcome measure was the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) neurocognitive battery composite score. In the intent-to-treat sample (donepezil, n=121; placebo, n=124), both treatments showed improvement in the composite score from baseline to week 12. At week 12, cognitive improvement with donepezil was similar to that with placebo (last-observation-carried-forward effect size, 0.277 vs 0.411; p=0.1182) and statistically significantly inferior for the observed-cases analysis (0.257 vs 0.450; p=0.044). There was statistically significant improvement in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Assessment Scale negative symptoms score for placebo compared with donepezil, while total and positive symptom scores were similar between both treatments. Statistically significant improvements in positive symptoms score and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement for donepezil compared with placebo were noted at Week 6. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were observed for 54.5% of donepezil- and 61.3% of placebo-treated patients; most AEs were rated as mild to moderate in severity. Donepezil was safe and well-tolerated but was not effective compared with placebo as a cotreatment for the improvement of cognitive impairment in this patient population. A significant and surprisingly large placebo/practice effect was observed among placebo-treated patients, and is a serious consideration in future clinical trial study designs for potential cognitive enhancing compounds in schizophrenia.     

Effects of galantamine in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND: Galantamine is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that modulates nicotinic receptors. It is effective in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) but no trial has focused exclusively on mild AD. We performed a post-hoc sub-set analysis using data from four randomised trials to explore the efficacy of galantamine versus placebo in mild AD. METHODS: Participants in all studies met NINCDS-ADRDA criteria for probable AD. We examined data from patients with baseline Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) 21-24 who received galantamine 24 mg/day (GAL) or placebo (PLAC). Scores for the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subset (ADAS-cog), Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change (CIBIC), Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD), and ACDS-ADL scales were compared. RESULTS: Of the 694 patients (362 GAL, 332 PLAC, mean baseline MMSE 22.4 +/- 1.1, mean age 74 +/- 7.9 years), 65% completed 6 months treatment (223 GAL, 229 PLAC). Mean change in ADAS-cog at 6 months was -1.5 (95% confidence interval -2.2, -0.8, p < 0.001) for GAL and +0.2 (-0.6, 0.9, p = 0.72) for PLAC. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Significantly more patients receiving galantamine were classified as 'improved' using the CIBIC (26.9% GAL vs 14.3% PLAC, p < 0.001). Galantamine was generally well tolerated; most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. CONCLUSIONS: Pooled data from four randomised trials of patients with mild AD indicate that patients who received galantamine 24 mg/day for 6 months improved cognition more often than those who received placebo and that a higher proportion receiving galantamine were globally improved. This suggests that patients with mild AD benefit from galantamine treatment.     

Budesonide (Entocort EC Capsules): a review of its therapeutic use in the management of active Crohn's disease in adults

Budesonide (Entocort EC Capsules) is an oral corticosteroid with a high degree of topical activity and low systemic bioavailability (approximately 11%). This action is achieved by a high affinity for the glucocorticoid receptor and an extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism. The budesonide capsule has been formulated to dissolve in a pH dependent manner, delivering most of the drug to the ileum and ascending colon, areas of the intestine most commonly affected by Crohn's disease. In large (n > or = 176), well designed clinical trials of 10 to 12 weeks' duration in patients with active, mild to moderate Crohn's disease, budesonide (9 mg/day) was significantly more effective in inducing remission than placebo or mesalazine (mesalamine) slow release, and demonstrated similar efficacy to recommended dosages of prednisolone. Results of health-related quality-of-life assessments support clinical data, showing a significantly greater improvement among patients treated with budesonide than with placebo or mesalazine slow release. Oral budesonide was well tolerated in clinical trials of up to 16 weeks' duration. In these studies, the incidence of adverse events associated with budesonide (9 mg/day) was similar to that seen with placebo and mesalazine slow release. The rate of glucocorticoid-related adverse effects observed with budesonide was significantly less than that reported with prednisolone. CONCLUSION: Oral budesonide 9 mg/day offers efficacy that is superior to mesalazine slow release and placebo, and similar to prednisolone in the treatment of patients with active mild to moderate Crohn's disease involving the ileum and/or ascending colon. Budesonide is generally well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events is similar to that seen with placebo or mesalazine slow release. Glucocorticoid-related adverse effects are significantly less frequent during short-term therapy with budesonide than with prednisolone. Thus, for the medical management of patients with active mild to moderate Crohn's disease, oral budesonide has superior efficacy to mesalazine slow release and a more favourable tolerability profile than prednisolone.     

Delayed-release Multi Matrix System (MMX) mesalazine: in ulcerative colitis

* Mesalazine appears to act locally on the mucosa of the colon and reduces the inflammation associated with ulcerative colitis. * Following oral administration, the majority (*78%) of a dose of delayed-release Multi Matrix System (MMX) mesalazine passes unabsorbed through the upper gastrointestinal tract to reach and traverse the entire length of the colon. * In a well designed phase III trial in patients with active, mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (n = 262), significantly (p < 0.01) more MMX mesalazine 2.4 (34%) or 4.8 g/day (29%) recipients than placebo recipients (13%) achieved clinical and endoscopic remission after 8 weeks of treatment.* In a second phase III trial (n = 341), clinical and endoscopic remission rates with MMX mesalazine 2.4 (40.5%) and 4.8 g/day (41.2%) were significantly (p < 0.01) greater than with placebo (22.1%) after 8 weeks, while the remission rate with non-MMX delayed-release mesalazine (Asacol) [32.6%] did not differ from placebo.* Overall, MMX mesalazine was generally well tolerated in controlled clinical trials, with a similar incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in placebo (66%) and MMX mesalazine (56%) recipients in a pooled analysis; most adverse events were of mild or moderate severity. Two of 434 MMX mesalazine recipients experienced serious adverse events that were considered treatment related (pancreatitis caused by mesalazine sensitivity).     

Efficacy and safety of rofecoxib 12.5 mg and celecoxib 200 mg in two similarly designed osteoarthritis studies

ABSTRACT

Objective:?To compare the lower osteoarthritis (OA) dose of rofecoxib to the recommended dose of celecoxib in two identically designed studies.

Methods:?Patients with knee OA were randomized (2:2:1 ratio: rofecoxib 12.5?mg once daily (qd), celecoxib 200?mg qd, or placebo, respectively). The primary endpoint was patient global assessment of response to therapy (PGART) averaged over 6 weeks on a five-point scale. Rofecoxib would be declared at least as effective as celecoxib if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for difference in means was no lower than –0.5. Additional endpoints included Pain and Physical Function subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) OA Index. Adverse experiences (AEs) were recorded and combined from the two studies for analysis.

Results:?Study 1 enrolled 395 patients (rofecoxib, n = 160; celecoxib, n = 157; placebo, n = 78). Study 2 enrolled 413 patients (rofecoxib, n = 159; celecoxib, n = 169; placebo, n = 85). Rofecoxib 12.5?mg was at least as effective as celecoxib 200?mg by PGART (Study 1 difference –0.09 [95% CI: –0.32, 0.14] and Study 2 difference 0.02 [95% CI: –0.20, 0.24]), and both were significantly (?p < 0.001) more effective than placebo. Comparable efficacy was also seen for WOMAC Pain and Physical Function subscales with the active treatments. There was a significantly higher (?p < 0.05) incidence of serious AEs with celecoxib than rofecoxib or placebo, none of which was drug-related. There were no significant differences in the pre-specified measurements of safety including drug-related AEs or discontinuations due to AEs, and the medications demonstrated similar safety as assessed by spontaneous reporting.

Conclusions:?Rofecoxib 12.5?mg and celecoxib 200?mg provided comparable efficacy over 6 weeks, and both were significantly more efficacious than placebo. The medications demonstrated similar safety compared to one another and placebo. The primary limitations of these studies were that they were only 6 weeks long and were powered for efficacy. Therefore, conclusions about long-term safety cannot be inferred.     

An analysis of safety and tolerability data from controlled, comparative studies of quetiapine in patients with schizophrenia, focusing on extrapyramidal symptoms

AIM: This analysis evaluated the tolerability profile of quetiapine using data from all comparative controlled studies in patients with schizophrenia or related disorders in the AstraZeneca clinical trials database, focusing on extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). METHODS: Adverse event (AE) data from randomised, double-blind, controlled studies in the AstraZeneca clinical trials database were pooled, allowing comparison of quetiapine (mean daily doses 357-496 mg/day) with placebo, haloperidol (10.4 mg/day), risperidone (5.5 mg/day) or chlorpromazine (552 mg/day). Incidence of EPS-related AEs in relation to quetiapine dose was also analysed using a subset of data from fixed-dose studies. RESULTS: Data from 4956 patients were analysed. Quetiapine was well tolerated, and did not increase EPS-related AEs when compared with placebo (9.6 vs. 10.6%, respectively). The incidence of EPS-related AEs with quetiapine was consistent across the dose range (4.2-13.2% vs. 11.1% with placebo). Patients receiving haloperidol, risperidone and chlorpromazine experienced significantly higher levels of EPS-related AEs than those on quetiapine. The most common quetiapine- associated AEs, with significantly higher incidence than placebo, were sedation, somnolence and orthostatic hypotension. CONCLUSION: Quetiapine is generally well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia or related disorders, with placebo-level EPS-related AEs. Quetiapine has a more favourable EPS profile than haloperidol, chlorpromazine or risperidone.     

Randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of early use of frovatriptan in a migraine attack versus dosing after the headache has become moderate or severe

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether frovatriptan would provide greater relief if given early during a migraine attack. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Adults with a history of migraine of at least 1 year, and who had 2-8 headaches in the previous month were recruited from 19 US centres for a prospective, placebo-controlled crossover study over 2 migraine attacks. Dose 1 was taken at the onset of mild migraine headache, Dose 2 was taken at least 2 h later if the headache progressed to moderate/severe. Patients were randomized to receive Dose 1 frovatriptan then Dose 2 placebo or Dose 1 placebo followed by Dose 2 frovatriptan. Treatment order was reversed for the second attack. This schedule enabled a comparison of frovatriptan with placebo and a comparison of early and later treatment with frovatriptan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Freedom from pain at 2 h for frovatriptan versus placebo as Dose 1; use of Dose 2 and/or rescue medication, pain severity, functional impairment and headache recurrence. RESULTS: In 241 patients who each treated 2 migraine attacks, Dose 1 frovatriptan was more effective than placebo in terms of the proportion of patients who were pain free at 2 h (28% vs 20%, p = 0.04). This benefit was sustained up to 4 h post-dose (p = 0.003). Early use of frovatriptan significantly reduced re-medication (p < 0.001). Twenty-four-hour headache recurrence was low in both early (4%) and later use (6%) groups. Sustained pain-free response occurred in 40% of frovatriptan early use patients compared with 31% of later use patients (p < 0.05). Early use prevented headache progression: 69%-78% had mild/no headache 2-4 h after Dose 1 frovatriptan compared with 54%-63% taking Dose 1 placebo (p < 0.001). Early use reduced pain burden and functional disability (p < or = 0.001). More patients rated early use of frovatriptan as excellent or good (57% vs 46%). CONCLUSIONS: Early use of frovatriptan resulted in a higher, earlier and sustained pain-free response, prevented progression to moderate/severe headache and reduced pain burden and functional disability.     

Effects of addition of policosanol to omega-3 fatty acid therapy on the lipid profile of patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia

BACKGROUND: Policosanol is a mixture of higher aliphatic primary alcohols purified from sugar-cane wax. The mixture has cholesterol-lowering efficacy, its specific effects being to reduce serum total (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and to increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). The effects of policosanol on triglycerides (TG) are modest and inconsistent. Omega-3 fatty acids (FA) from fish oil protect against coronary disease, mainly through antiarrhythmic and antiplatelet effects. Omega-3 FA also have lipid-modifying effects, mostly relating to TG reduction. Thus, potential benefits could be expected from combined therapy with omega-3 FA and policosanol. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether combined therapy with omega-3 FA + policosanol offers benefits compared with omega-3 FA + placebo with respect to the lipid profile of patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind study was conducted in 90 patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia. After 5 weeks on a cholesterol-lowering diet, patients were randomised to omega-3 FA + placebo, omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 mg/day or omega-3 FA + policosanol 10 mg/day for 8 weeks. Omega-3 FA was supplied as 1g capsules (two per day); placebo and policosanol were provided in tablet form. Physical signs and laboratory markers were assessed at baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks on therapy. Drug compliance and adverse experiences (AEs) were assessed at weeks 4 and 8. The primary efficacy variable was LDL-C reduction; other lipid profile markers were secondary variables. RESULTS: After 8 weeks, omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 and 10 mg/day, but not omega-3 FA + placebo, significantly reduced LDL-C by 21.1% and 24.4%, respectively (both p < 0.0001). Omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 mg/day also significantly lowered TC (12.7%; p < 0.01) and TG (13.6%; p < 0.05), and significantly increased HDL-C (+14.4%; p < 0.001). Omega-3 FA + policosanol 10 mg/day significantly decreased TC (15.3%; p < 0.001) and TG (14.7%; p < 0.01), and significantly increased HDL-C (+15.5%; p < 0.0001). Omega-3 FA + placebo significantly reduced TG (14.2%; p < 0.05) but had no significant effect on other lipid profile variables. The proportion of randomised patients in the omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 or 10 mg/day groups that achieved LDL-C targets or reductions 15% was significantly greater than in the omega-3 FA + placebo group (p < 0.001). Combined therapy with omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 or 10 mg/day resulted in significantly greater changes in LDL-C, TC and HDL-C than treatment with omega-3 FA + placebo, but did not modify the TG response compared with the omega-3 FA + placebo group. Four patients (two in the omega-3 FA + placebo group and two in the omega-3 FA + policosanol 10 mg/day group) withdrew from the study; none of these withdrawals was due to AEs. Two patients reported mild AEs, namely nausea/headache (one in the omega-3 FA + placebo group) and heartburn (one in the omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 mg/day group). CONCLUSIONS: Policosanol 5 or 10 mg/day administered concomitantly with omega-3 FA 1 g/day improved LDL-C, TC and HDL-C, maintained the reduction in TG attributable to omega-3 FA monotherapy, and was well tolerated. Treatment with omega-3 FA + policosanol could be useful for regulating lipid profile in patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia, but further studies involving larger sample sizes are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn.