Galvanically induced body sway in the anterior-posterior plane

Anterior-posterior body sway was evoked with monopolar bi-aural galvanic stimulus of the vestibular nerves in normal subjects and recorded with a force platform, two experiments being conducted. In an experiment of paired design, 9 normal subjects showed an increase in anterior-posterior sway as compared with lateral sway when exposed to the stimulus. In a second experiment another group of 10 normal subjects were exposed to a galvanic stimulus between a neck electrode and two electrodes placed on the arms, but there was no change in the relationship between anterior-posterior and lateral body sway. It is concluded that monopolar galvanic stimulus of the vestibular nerves can induce anterior-posterior body sway, a phenomenon which can be utilised to investigate the vestibulo-spinal contribution in postural control in the anterior-posterior plane.     

Significance of pressor input from the human feet in lateral postural control. The effect of hypothermia on galvanically induced body-sway

The significance to human postural control of pressor information from the feet was investigated during vestibular disturbance in seven normal subjects who were exposed to bipolar biaural galvanic stimulation of the vestibular nerves before and after their feet were anaesthetized with hypothermia. The increase in body sway in the lateral plane induced by the galvanic stimulus was enhanced when the feet were anaesthetized, and adaptation of postural control to the galvanic stimulus was delayed. It is concluded that pressor information from the feet contributes significantly to postural control in humans and is important in compensating for vestibular disturbance.     

Direction of galvanically-induced vestibulo-postural responses during active and passive neck torsion

The direction of a postural response induced by galvanic vestibular stimulation depends on the head and trunk position. The relative importance of afferent information (proprioception) and efferent motor command/corollary discharge is unknown. We studied the direction of body sway evoked by galvanic vestibular stimulation in 9 healthy subjects during active and passive head positioning at 0 degrees frontal position, 35 degrees to the left, and 75 degrees to the right, using a custom-built collar. At 0 degrees and 75 degrees there were no significant differences in sway direction between active and passive head positioning. The galvanic stimulation invoked sway toward the anode, mainly in the inter-aural direction. The sway direction differed significantly between active and passive positioning at 35 degrees to the side (p < 0.05). When the head was actively kept in this position, the body sway was mainly in an inter-aural direction. The sway shifted to a naso-occipital direction when the head was passively positioned at 35 degrees. Our results indicate that the afferent proprioceptive information has the largest influence on the direction of the galvanically-induced postural response, although some dependence on efferent motor commands and non-linear cervical proprioception cannot be ruled out entirely.     

Direction of Galvanically-induced Vestibulo-postural Responses during Active and Passive Neck Torsion

The direction of a postural response induced by galvanic vestibular stimulation depends on the head and trunk position. The relative importance of afferent information (proprioception) and efferent motor command/corollary discharge is unknown. We studied the direction of body sway evoked by galvanic vestibular stimulation in 9 healthy subjects during active and passive head positioning at 0° frontal position, 35° to the left, and 75° to the right, using a custom-built collar. At 0° and 75° there were no significant differences in sway direction between active and passive head positioning. The galvanic stimulation invoked sway toward the anode, mainly in the inter-aural direction. The sway direction differed significantly between active and passive positioning at 35° to the side (p&lt;0.05). When the head was actively kept in this position, the body sway was mainly in an inter-aural direction. The sway shifted to a naso-occipital direction when the head was passively positioned at 35°. Our results indicate that the afferent proprioceptive information has the largest influence on the direction of the galvanically-induced postural response, although some dependence on efferent motor commands and non-linear cervical proprioception cannot be ruled out entirely.     

Galvanic-Induced Postural Movements As a Test of Vestibular Function in Humans

Galvanic stimulation produces postural sway and eye movements in humans. Since galvanic currents are thought to exert their effect at the trigger zone of the vestibular nerve, an intact vestibular nerve should be necessary to produce a response. We have used galvanic stimulation in humans to test the hypothesis that intact vestibular nerve fibers are required to obtain a postural sway response. Experimental subjects included normal subjects, patients who had undergone resection of an acoustic neuroma, and patients who had undergone vestibular neurectomy and surgical labyrinthectomy. Our results support the hypothesis that an intact vestibular nerve is necessary to produce a response. Moreover, two patients with recurrent vertigo following vestibular neurectomy and labyrinthectomy, who had absent ice-water caloric test responses in the operated ears, were found to have a positive galvanic response. This result suggested that their recurrent vertigo was based on intact residual vestibular nerve fibers. Although previous research has not yielded a routine clinical use for galvanic stimulation, our results suggest that galvanic stimulation of the vestibular system can provide unique and valuable diagnostic information.     

Habituation to galvanic vestibular stimulation

OBJECTIVE: To examine the response decline that occurs upon repetitive galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) and hampers long-term clinical evaluations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective experimental study conducted in a tertiary referral centre. In a previous study we developed a standardized procedure for reproducible quantification of galvanic-induced body sway (GBS). The most reproducible responses were found using a continuous 1-cosinusoidal stimulus (0.5 Hz; 2 mA) preceded by a pre-habituating stimulus. This binaural prestimulation reduced the short-term (<5 min) response decline to a non-significant level. The response decline without prestimulation was interpreted as habituation to the galvanic stimulation. In the present study we evaluated possible long-term habituation to GVS, which may hamper longitudinal clinical evaluations. Possible long-term habituation using the short-term habituating prestimulus concept was studied by quantifying GBS in 40 subjects at 5 consecutive time points. Subjects were subdivided into four equal groups who were tested with four different time intervals between the five measurements, ranging from 1 day to 2 weeks. RESULTS: The absolute test results did not vary with the time interval (p=0.217; repeated measurement test). Irrespective of the time interval between the tests, habituation occurred after the first stimulation and remained stable at all consecutive measurements. GVS habituation did not depend on either the degree of daily life activity (moderate practice of sport) or on gender. CONCLUSION: The current protocol, using a prehabituating binaural stimulus, showed that reproducible assessment of the GVS over a time course of days to weeks was possible starting from the second test.     

Postural responses evoked by sinusoidal galvanic stimulation of the labyrinth. Influence of head position

In 15 healthy subjects we studied body sway reactions to sinusoidal 0.3 Hz binaural bipolar galvanic current up to 2 mA under three conditions. With the head forward and eyes closed, there is only a periodic lateral displacement of the centre of gravity, following the stimulation with a phase lag. In two other conditions, the head turned to the left or to the right without trunk torsion, the direction of sway was modified in such a way that there were mainly anteroposterior movements. It is thought that this experiment shows the modulatory influence of neck afferents on the direction of vestibulospinal motor effects in man.     

Habituation to galvanic vestibular stimulation for analysis of susceptibility to carsickness

OBJECTIVE: In a previous study we developed a standardized procedure for a reproducible quantification of galvanic-induced body sway (GBS). In line with other reports, GBS shows short-term (fast) habituation upon stimulus repetition. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the degree of short-term habituation to galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is correlated with susceptibility to carsickness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 24 female subjects underwent computer-controlled GVS as part of a prospective experimental study conducted in a tertiary referral center. A binaural 1-cosinusoidal stimulus of 0.5 Hz and 1 mA was repeated five times. Binaural stimulation was chosen to obtain maximum responses, making possible habituation to repetitive GVS obvious. The groups consisted of 12 subjects suffering from carsickness and 12 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Analysis of the repeated measurements test showed that the GBS-gain curve for the carsickness group was always superimposed on that for the healthy subjects. However, the (absolute) first to fifth GBS gains showed no significant differences (p = 0.134 - 0.995). When comparing short-term habituation in subjects suffering from carsickness versus healthy subjects, the results showed no differences in the mean values of the first (30.534% vs 27.024%), final (42.637% vs 38.544%) and average (35.544% vs 33.644%) habituations (p = 0.875, 0.991 and 0.951, respectively). CONCLUSION: We did not observe any significant differences in sensitivity or habituation of the GBS in carsick subjects compared to healthy subjects. This implies that carsick subjects show a similar ability to discard an irrelevant, non-motion sickness-inducing galvanic stimulus as healthy subjects.     

Background on methods of stimulation in galvanic-induced body sway in young healthy adults

The aim of this study was to develop a standardized procedure for reproducible quantification of galvanic-induced body sway (GBS). This was a prospective experimental study conducted in a tertiary referral centre. An exploratory study was first conducted to define the galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) method that resulted in the best reproducible responses. Ten subjects underwent computer-controlled GVS using five different types of monaural and binaural stimulation with 2-mA currents. Cosinusoidal stimulation gave the most reproducible responses. The frequency and current variability of this stimulus type were then tested in the same 10 subjects. A monaural continuous 1-cosinusoidal current of 0.5 Hz and 2 mA gave the most reproducible responses (< 20% test-retest variation) and the largest GBS amplitude. The other (sinusoidal) stimuli resulted in variabilities exceeding 50%. This stimulus was thus used for further testing in our normative study. In this study we measured GBS amplitude at 0.5 Hz in 60 subjects, with eyes closed and an inter-feet distance of 0 cm, using a force platform. In addition to body sway, responses included slight dizziness, taste sensations and a tingling sensation at the site of stimulation. Habituation to the applied stimulus was seen. Binaural prestimulation, performed in 50/60 test subjects, is necessary to reduce habituation and achieve optimal reproducibility in order to be able to compare the sensitivity of the left and right vestibular systems. The test-retest variability was determined in detail in 12 additional subjects. Prestimulation reduced habituation, but improved the sensitivity of the method; some test-retest variability persisted (< 20%).     

Habituation to galvanic vestibular stimulation for analysis of susceptibility to carsickness

Objective In a previous study we developed a standardized procedure for a reproducible quantification of galvanic-induced body sway (GBS). In line with other reports, GBS shows short-term (fast) habituation upon stimulus repetition. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the degree of short-term habituation to galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is correlated with susceptibility to carsickness.

Material and Methods A total of 24 female subjects underwent computer-controlled GVS as part of a prospective experimental study conducted in a tertiary referral center. A binaural 1–cosinusoidal stimulus of 0.5 Hz and 1 mA was repeated five times. Binaural stimulation was chosen to obtain maximum responses, making possible habituation to repetitive GVS obvious. The groups consisted of 12 subjects suffering from carsickness and 12 healthy subjects.

Results Analysis of the repeated measurements test showed that the GBS–gain curve for the carsickness group was always superimposed on that for the healthy subjects. However, the (absolute) first to fifth GBS gains showed no significant differences (p=0.134?0.995). When comparing short-term habituation in subjects suffering from carsickness versus healthy subjects, the results showed no differences in the mean values of the first (30.534% vs 27.024%), final (42.637% vs 38.544%) and average (35.544% vs 33.644%) habituations (p=0.875, 0.991 and 0.951, respectively).

Conclusion We did not observe any significant differences in sensitivity or habituation of the GBS in carsick subjects compared to healthy subjects. This implies that carsick subjects show a similar ability to discard an irrelevant, non-motion sickness-inducing galvanic stimulus as healthy subjects.     

Short-term Adaptation in the Peripheral Auditory System is Related to the AMPA Receptor

A pattern of sound-induced paroxysms of the eye and head and other spinal motor neuron synkinesis (Tullio's phenomenon) in human subjects always implies either a pathological contiguity of the tympano-ossicular chain and membranous labyrinth or a dehiscence of the bone overlying the superior semicircular canal. However, it has become clear in the last decade that sound-evoked vestibular stimulation is not only a sign of disease but also a physiological phenomenon. The examination of such physiologically sound-induced vestibular (saccular) responses contributes today to the clinical testing of the vestibular organ, mainly in the form of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials. In this study it was observed that, in a group of 20 normal subjects, a 500 Hz tonal stimulus of high intensity (105 dB HL=118.5 dB SPL), applied monoaurally, elicited postural responses. Each subject was studied under 4 different conditions: (i) head facing forwards, eyes open; (ii) head facing forwards, eyes closed; (iii) head rotated &;#44 90° to the right, eyes closed; and (iv) head rotated 90° to the left, eyes closed. Body sway, measured using a force platform, was recorded in all subjects, with eyes either open or closed. Postural responses, which were also elicited with a 250 Hz tonal stimulus, were not observed with a tone of 2000 Hz, with legs slightly flexed or with binaural stimulation. The postural sway (head facing forwards, eyes open or closed) was in a lateral direction towards the stimulated ear: with the stimulus applied to the right ear the subject had postural sway towards the right, with the stimulus applied to the left ear towards the left. When the head was rotated &;#44 90° sideways and the stimulus was given facing forwards (i.e. head rotated contralaterally to stimulated ear) the postural sway was in a forward direction; when the head was rotated &;#44 90° sideways and the stimulus was given facing backwards (i.e. head rotated ipsilaterally to stimulated ear) the postural sway was in a backward direction. The mean values (mm) of body sway obtained with the head facing forwards and the eyes closed were higher than those with the eyes open (21.7 and 22.8 vs 15.7 and 14.7 for the right and left ears, respectively); higher mean values were obtained with the head turned to the side contralateral to the ear stimulated and the eyes closed (29.3 and 24.8 for the right and left ears, respectively). Under this condition the body sway was mainly in a forward direction. The sound-evoked vestibulopostural reflex seems to be a useful test for exploring the saccular function and, as a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex, can be considered a physiological Tullio phenomenon.     

Patient and normal three-dimensional eye-movement responses to maintained (DC) surface galvanic vestibular stimulation.

HYPOTHESIS: That disease or dysfunction of vestibular end organs in human patients will reduce or eliminate the contribution of the affected end organs to the total eye-movement response to DC surface galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS). BACKGROUND: It was assumed that DC GVS (at current of 5 mA) stimulates all vestibular end organs, an assumption that is strongly supported by physiological evidence, including the activation of primary vestibular afferent neurons by galvanic stimulation. Previous studies also have described the oculomotor responses to vestibular activation. Stimulation of individual semicircular canals results in eye movements parallel to the plane of the stimulated canal, and stimulation of the utricular macula produces changes in ocular torsional position. It was also assumed that the total three-dimensional eye-movement response to GVS is the sum of the contributions of the oculomotor drive of all the vestibular end organs. If a particular vestibular end organ were to be diseased or dysfunctional, it was reasoned that its contribution to the GVS-induced oculomotor response would be reduced or absent and that patients thus affected would have a systematic difference in their GVS-induced oculomotor response compared with the response of normal healthy individuals. METHODS: Three-dimensional video eye-movement recording was carried out in complete darkness on normal healthy subjects and patients with various types of vestibular dysfunction, as diagnosed by independent vestibular clinical tests. The eye-movement response to long-duration bilateral and unilateral surface GVS was measured. RESULTS: The pattern of horizontal, vertical, and torsional eye velocity and eye position during GVS of patients independently diagnosed with bilateral vestibular dysfunction, unilateral vestibular dysfunction, CHARGE syndrome (semicircular canal hypoplasia), semicircular canal occlusion, or inferior vestibular neuritis differed systematically from the responses of normal healthy subjects in ways that corresponded to the expectations from the conceptual approach of the study. CONCLUSION: The study reports the first data on the differences between the normal response to GVS and those of patients with a number of clinical vestibular conditions including unilateral vestibular loss, canal block, and vestibular neuritis. The GVS-induced eye-movement patterns of patients with vestibular dysfunction are consistent with the reduction or absence of oculomotor contribution from the end organs implicated in their particular disease condition.     

Sound-evoked postural responses in normal subjects

A pattern of sound-induced paroxysms of the eye and head and other spinal motor neuron synkinesis (Tullio's phenomenon) in human subjects always implies either a pathological contiguity of the tympano-ossicular chain and membranous labyrinth or a dehiscence of the bone overlying the superior semicircular canal. However, it has become clear in the last decade that sound-evoked vestibular stimulation is not only a sign of disease but also a physiological phenomenon, The examination of such physiologically sound-induced vestibular (saccular) responses contributes today to the clinical testing of the vestibular organ, mainly in the form of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials. In this study it was observed that, in a group of 20 normal subjects, a 500 Hz tonal stimulus of high intensity (105 dB HL = 118.5 dB SPL), applied monoaurally, elicited postural responses. Each subject was studied under 4 different conditions: (i) head facing forwards, eyes open; (ii) head facing forwards, eyes closed; (iii) head rotated approximately 90 degrees to the right, eyes closed: and (iv) head rotated approximately 90 degrees to the left, eyes closed. Body sway, measured using a force platform, was recorded in all subjects, with eyes either open or closed. Postural responses, which were also elicited with a 250 Hz tonal stimulus, were not observed with a tone of 2000 Hz, with legs slightly flexed or with binaural stimulation. The postural sway (head facing forwards, eyes open or closed) was in a lateral direction towards the stimulated ear: with the stimulus applied to the right ear the subject had postural sway towards the right, with the stimulus applied to the left ear towards the left. When the head was rotated approximately 90 degrees sideways and the stimulus was given facing forwards (i.e. head rotated contralaterally to stimulated ear) the postural sway was in a forward direction; when the head was rotated approximately 90 degrees sideways and the stimulus was given facing backwards (i.e. head rotated ipsilaterally to stimulated ear) the postural sway was in a backward direction. The mean values (mm) of body sway obtained with the head facing forwards and the eyes closed were higher than those with the eyes open (21.7 and 22.8 vs 15.7 and 14.7 for the right and left ears, respectively); higher mean values were obtained with the head turned to the side contralateral to the ear stimulated and the eyes closed (29.3 and 24.8 for the right and left ears, respectively). Under this condition the body sway was mainly in a forward direction. The sound-evoked vestibulopostural reflex seems to be a useful test for exploring the saccular function and, as a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex, can be considered a physiological Tullio phenomenon.     

Response to galvanic vestibular stimulation in patients with unilateral vestibular loss

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize various responses to galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) by comparing GVS-induced eye movements in healthy subjects and patients with vestibular function loss. The study also aimed to estimate the clinical significance of GVS tests. Finally, an effort was made to localize the primary excitation site of stimulation in the vestibular system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three parameters of response to GVS, spontaneous nystagmus, galvanic stimulating nystagmus (GSN), and postgalvanic stimulating nystagmus (PGSN), were evaluated in 20 normal subjects and 14 patients with complete unilateral vestibular function loss resulting from labyrinthectomy or vestibular neurectomy using a three-dimensional video-electronystagmography technique. RESULTS: In normal subjects, GSN was detected in all subjects and was directed toward the negative electrode. PGSN was also detected but was directed toward the opposite electrode. When the negative electrode was attached to the intact side in unilateral vestibular loss subjects, GSN was always directed toward the negative electrode and PGSN was never observed. When the negative electrode was attached to the lesion side, however, GSN was detected in only one case, and PGSN was observed and directed to the intact side in 13 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The response to GVS in vestibular loss patients differed from that in normal subjects, which suggests that GVS could be useful for estimating the extent of vestibular function loss. The fact that the patterns of GVS response differed so significantly suggests that the primary site of excitation is not central but is instead the peripheral vestibular organ.     

Postural control in patients with unilateral vestibular lesions is more impaired in the roll than in the pitch plane: a static and dynamic posturography study

The postural instability of patients with vestibular loss (11 with bilateral and 101 with unilateral vestibular loss) at different times following the lesion was investigated by means of posturography and compared to healthy subjects. In addition, subjects submitted to galvanic vestibular stimulation were also studied to compare their postural performances with those of patients with complete unilateral vestibular lesion. The platform consisted of a static computerized force platform, on which a seesaw platform could be placed to test the subjects in dynamic conditions. The displacement of the center of foot pressure was measured under different conditions: subjects standing on the fixed platform, eyes open and eyes closed and subjects standing on the seesaw platform, eyes open and eyes closed. In the last condition, balance was tested in the subject's pitch plane by allowing the platform to rotate forwards and backwards only and in the patient's roll plane by allowing the platform to rotate to the left and to the right. The results showed that in static conditions, only bilateral vestibular loss patients had abnormal values compared to controls. In contrast, in dynamic eyes-closed conditions, both bilateral and unilateral patients could be differentiated from controls. Bilateral patients were unable to stand up without falling in both pitch and roll planes. Unilateral patients fell in the first week following the lesion and exhibited increased postural oscillations in both planes from the 2-week up to the 1-year postlesion stage. In addition and more importantly, they fell more often or had higher sway in the roll than in the pitch plane. Therefore, this study suggests that dynamic posturography on a seesaw platform could be a valuable tool for clinical diagnosis and quantitative analysis of imbalance in patients suffering from a unilateral vestibular loss up to 1 year after the lesion.     

Paraspinal muscle response to electrical vestibular stimulation

Galvanic (electrical) vestibular stimulation (GVS) has been used to study the role of the vestibular system in postural control by inducing postural sway in standing subjects. The purpose of this study was to determine the timing and pattern of activation in the paraspinal muscles in response to GVS and to compare these responses with those in the muscles of the lower leg. Binaural-bipolar GVS was applied to the skin overlying the mastoid processes of 10 subjects while they stood on a force plate with their eyes closed. The stimulus consisted of a 0.6 mA 5-pulse sequence. Each pulse lasted for 2 s, followed by 4 s of rest. The centre of pressure (COP) vs. time for each trial was calculated from the reaction forces and moments. Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals from the paraspinal and gastrocnemius muscles were recorded bilaterally. The EMG signals were rectified and integrated (iEMG). The iEMG from the muscles on the cathodal side of the body were then subtracted from the iEMG of the anodal side muscles, to yield a differential EMG (dEMG). Both the paraspinal and gastrocnemius muscles became activated in response to the stimulus. The pattern of activation was consistent with the changes observed in the centre of pressure. The primary response in both muscles acted to move the body toward the anode. This primary response began at 74 +/- 20 ms in the paraspinal muscles and at 118 +/- 18 ms in the gastrocnemius. A second component of the response began at 232 +/- 27 ms in the paraspinal muscles and 262 +/- 54 ms in the gastrocnemius muscles. This second phase of the response was opposite in direction to the primary response and was responsible for decelerating the body and maintaining the deviated position of the centre of mass over the base of support. Following the termination of the stimulus, the opposite pattern of muscle activation in both the paraspinal and the gastrocnemius muscles was observed. The results of this study suggest that the paraspinal muscles may play a significant role in the frontal plane response to vestibular stimulation during stance in humans.     

Head and body sway in response to vertical visual stimulation

CONCLUSIONS: Postural responses differed according to the stimulus direction, i.e. vertical visual stimulation induced head rather than trunk displacements. Accordingly, it could be that center of foot pressure (COP) responses tended to underestimate the postural sway during visual stimulation. OBJECTIVES: To investigate head and body sway in response to vertical visual surround motion, and to examine the correlation between the displacements of head and body segments derived from video-motion analysis and COP measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Postural sway was assessed in 10 young female subjects by video-motion analysis of four different head and body segments, and by use of force-plate posturography. Head and body sway in the pitch plane was induced by rotating a random pattern of dots about the subject's inter-aural axis at a constant acceleration of 1 degree/s(2) or a constant velocity of 60 degrees/s in darkness. RESULTS: Generally, head displacement was greater than that of other body parts during vertical optokinetic stimulation (OKS). In most subjects, maximum head displacements were induced in the same direction as the visual motion. Downward OKS induced a forward head and body sway. The COP trajectory correlated well with the displacements of each head and body segment during downward OKS. In contrast, postural responses to upward OKS were complicated in terms of their time course. The correlation coefficient between each head and body segment and the COP varied among individuals for upward OKS.     

Influence of Neck Proprioception on Vibration-induced Postural Sway

Objective --Several reports have shown that the direction of the postural responses induced by vestibular stimulation is affected by the positions of the neck and torso. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the postural responses to vibratory proprioceptive stimulation of the calf muscles are affected by the position of the head and thus by proprioceptive and vestibular information from the neck and head. Material and Methods --Ten normal subjects were exposed to vibratory proprioceptive stimulation of the calf muscles when the head was maintained in five different positions: in a neutral position facing forwards, with the head turned to the right or left sides or with the head tilted backwards or forwards. Body movements were evaluated by analyzing the anteroposterior and lateral torques induced towards the supporting surface. Results --The analysis showed that only the anteroposterior body sway was significantly affected by the position of the head. The anteroposterior postural responses were primarily increased during the tests with the head tilted backwards or forwards, whereas the postural responses were unaffected by head torsion towards the sides. The lateral responses were primarily affected by vision and not by the position of the head. Conclusion --The findings suggest that the responses evoked by vibratory proprioceptive stimulation of the calf muscles may be affected by different mechanisms, either by purely proprioceptive information or by an interaction between proprioceptive and vestibular information. Moreover, the increasing difference between the test conditions over time suggests that fatigue of the neck muscles may be one of the factors affecting the responses induced by the perturbations.     

Influence of neck proprioception on vibration-induced postural sway

OBJECTIVE: Several reports have shown that the direction of the postural responses induced by vestibular stimulation is affected by the positions of the neck and torso. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the postural responses to vibratory proprioceptive stimulation of the calf muscles are affected by the position of the head and thus by proprioceptive and vestibular information from the neck and head. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten normal subjects were exposed to vibratory proprioceptive stimulation of the calf muscles when the head was maintained in five different positions: in a neutral position facing forwards, with the head turned to the right or left sides or with the head tilted backwards or forwards. Body movements were evaluated by analyzing the anteroposterior and lateral torques induced towards the supporting surface. RESULTS: The analysis showed that only the anteroposterior body sway was significantly affected by the position of the head. The anteroposterior postural responses were primarily increased during the tests with the head tilted backwards or forwards, whereas the postural responses were unaffected by head torsion towards the sides. The lateral responses were primarily affected by vision and not by the position of the head. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the responses evoked by vibratory proprioceptive stimulation of the calf muscles may be affected by different mechanisms, either by purely proprioceptive information or by an interaction between proprioceptive and vestibular information. Moreover, the increasing difference between the test conditions over time suggests that fatigue of the neck muscles may be one of the factors affecting the responses induced by the perturbations.     

Effect of head orientation on human postural stability following unilateral vestibular ablation.

Effective interpretation of vestibular inputs to postural control requires that orientation of head on body is known. Postural stability might deteriorate when vestibular information and neck information are not properly coupled, as might occur with vestibular pathology. Postural sway was assessed in unilateral vestibulopathic patients before and acutely, 1, 4, and 18+ months after unilateral vestibular ablation (UVA) as well as in normal subjects. Postural equilibrium with eyes closed was quantified as scaled pk-pk sway during 20 s trials in which the support surface was modulated proportionally with sway. Subjects were tested with the head upright and facing forward, turned 45 degrees right, and 45 degrees left. Equilibrium was uninfluenced by head orientation in normal subjects. In contrast, patients after UVA showed both a general reduction in stability and a right/left head orientation-dependent asymmetry. These abnormalities adaptively recovered with time. It is concluded that vestibular inputs to postural control are interpreted within a sensory-motor context of head-on-body orientation.