Adenocarcinoma in the ileal pouch: late risk of cancer after restorative proctocolectomy

Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the surgical treatment of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis. As a long-term complication of this procedure, chronic pouchitis impairs the outcome in a number of patients. Aneuploidia and dysplasia have been observed after long-lasting inflammation of ileal mucosa. The question arises whether chronic inflammation of ileal mucosa predisposes to malignant transformation similar to the situation in the chronically inflamed colon. Cancer of the ileal mucosa has been reported in patients with Brooke's ileostomy and in patients with Kock pouch but not as yet in those with an ileoanal pouch. We report a patient with carcinoma in an ileoanal pouch originating from terminal ileal mucosa who had been suffering from pancolitis with long-term backwash ileitis before, and from chronic pouchitis after, restorative proctocolectomy. This case demonstrates the importance of regular follow-up with pouchoscopy and random biopsies in all patients with long-standing inflammation of the ileal mucosa.     

Long-term quality of life after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has evolved as the surgical procedure of choice for ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of our study was to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of UC patients who underwent this procedure over 5 years ago. Thirty-nine UC patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA were interviewed by the validated inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ). Each patient was assigned a score, ranging from 32 to 224, in which the highest score indicates the best QOL. QOL for postoperative patients was good in 15 (38.5 %), regular in 23 (59 %), and bad in 1 (2.6 %) patient. QOL was not significantly influenced by age or gender of the patient. The emotional aspect received the highest score in the IBDQ and for each question that was analyzed separately; most of the patients were pleased and thankful with their lives and this question received the highest score. Long-term QOL was good in UC patients who underwent IPAA. This operation should be considered as the first choice since the patients were stable after long-term follow up.     

Confocal laser endomicroscopy for the detection of mucosal changes in ileal pouch after restorative proctocolectomy

BackgroundPouchitis and dysplasia may affect the reservoir after restorative proctocolectomy.AimsTo assess the suitability of confocal laser endomicroscopy for the in vivo diagnosis of mucosal changes in ileal pouch for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.MethodsStandard endoscopy and endomicroscopy were performed in 18 pouches. Confocal images were scored for the presence of villous atrophy, inflammation, ulceration, colonic metaplasia and dysplasia. Targeted biopsies were taken. Endomicroscopic and histological findings were compared.ResultsAt standard endoscopy, the signs of pouchitis were recorded in 7/18 (38.9%) patients. At endomicroscopy, pathological features were found in 16/18 (88.9%), villous atrophy in 15/18 (83.3%), inflammation in 13/18 (72.2%), ulceration in 3/18 (16.7%), and colonic metaplasia in 12/18 (67.7%). No dysplasia was observed. At histology, abnormalities were present in 17/18 (94.4%): villous atrophy in 15/18 (83.3%), inflammation in 17/18 (94.4%), ulceration in 6/18 (33.3%), colonic metaplasia in 15/18 (83.3%). Morphological changes of the ileal pouch could be predicted with an accuracy of 94.4% (95% CI: 74.2–99.0). The k-value for intra- and interobserver agreement was 0.93 and 0.78, respectively.ConclusionsEndomicroscopy may be helpful in the evaluation of morphologic changes in ileal pouch. The small size of the population sample requires further studies for the results to be confirmed.     

Incidence of neoplastic polyps in the ileal pouch of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after restorative proctocolectomy

PURPOSE: Although adenomatous polyps and even adenocarcinomas have been found in the terminal ileum of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, the prevalence of neoplastic changes in the pouches of patients who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of pelvic pouch neoplasia in famial adenomatous polyposis patients after restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS: Patients in a polyposis registry who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy were recruited. Demographic, surgical, pathologic, and endoscopic data were obtained from patient records. Video pouchoscopy was done after two enemas and representative biopsies were taken. RESULTS: Of 102 eligible patients, 26 (17 males and 9 females) participated. Median age at ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was 31 (range, 12–58) years. Median follow-up period was 66 (11–156) months. Adenomas were found in the pouch of 11 (42 percent) patients, in the terminal ileum above the pouch in 1 patient, and in the anal canal of 4 patients. Among patients with pouch polyps, three patients had one lesion, three patients had two lesions, and five patients had more than ten lesions. The incidence of polyps increased steadily with time from restorative proctocolectomy. There was no relation between the incidence of pouch polyposis and the severity of colonic or duodenal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is associated with a significant risk of pouch neoplasia in familial adenomatous polyposis patients. The severity of pouch adenomas was not related either to the severity of colonic or duodenal disease. The pelvic pouches of all patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy should be examined periodically.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 22 to 26, 1997.     

Anti-reflux pouch-esophagostomy after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal pouch interposition reconstruction

Reflux esophagitis is a serious postoperative complication for patients undergoing gastrectomy. We designed a new jejunal pouch-esophagostomy to prevent reflux after proximal gastrectomy. After proximal gastrectomy, ajejunal segment about 17 cm long was folded. Side-to-side jejuno-jejunostomy was made using a linear stapler with 100-mm staples along the length at the anti-mesenteric side. A 10-cm-longjejunal pouch with a 7-cm-long apical bridge was made. Esophago-jejuno end-to-side anastomosis (pouch-esophagostomy) was made with circular stapler at the right anterior wall the apical bridge. We add "partial posterior fundoplication" like wrapping using the apical bridge of the jejunal pouch. Patients with this new anti-reflux anastomosis showed no reflux on barium meal study even in the right anterior oblique deep Trendelenburg's position. Jejunal pouch reconstruction with partial posterior wrapping provides a satisfactory result with regard to preventing reflux esophagitis.     

How I do it: the stapled ileal J pouch at restorative proctocolectomy

Background  

Ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy is the preferred option for patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis, indeterminate colitis, and familial adenomatous polyposis. However, it remains a procedure associated with morbidity and mortality. Pelvic sepsis, pouch fistulae, and anastomotic dehiscence predispose to pouch failure. We report our experience with an adaptation for the formation of the stapled ileal J pouch using the GIA™ 100 stapling device (Covidien, Mansfield, Massachusetts, USA). When creating the J pouch, we remove the bevelled plastic protector from the thin fork of the stapling device, allowing the staple line to be completed to the tip of the stapled efferent limb of the pouch, thereby minimizing potential blind ending in the efferent limb and injury to the transverse staple line.     

Serious complications after a proximal gastrectomy with a jejunal pouch interposition for gastric cancer

Proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition is a common surgical method in Japan, because the procedure has been shown to give a better post-operative quality of life. Some complications are associated with it. However, esophageal candidiasis and linear marginal ulcer along the gastrojejunal anastomosis after the surgical method has never previously been reported. We herein report a case of a patient who developed serious complications after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition. A 68-year-old man underwent proximal gastrectomy with a jejunal pouch interposition for reconstruction for type 1 gastric cancer. Twenty-three months after the procedure, he complained of dysphagia and epigastric pain. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed esophageal candidiasis. The patient improved symptomatically following antifungal medication with fluconazole. Eleven months later, the patient developed severe pneumonia. In subsequent days, a melena episode occurred. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a linear marginal ulcer along three-fourths of the gastrojejunal anastomosis. The ulcer was drug resistant. The patient died of respiratory failure. Jejunal pouch interposition after a proximal gastrectomy can be associated with significant complications. Further studies are required to identify the best condition of the procedure.     

Ileal pouch fistulas after restorative proctocolectomy: management and outcomes

Background

Fistula between an ileal pouch and the vagina, anus, or perineum is an uncommon complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and is a cause of considerable morbidity. Its optimal management has not been determined because of its low incidence. The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of patients who presented with symptomatic ileal pouch-associated fistulas after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) and to present a diagnostic and treatment algorithm.

Methods

Retrospective review of patients treated for symptomatic ileal pouch-associated fistulas after RPC from 1989 to 2011.

Results

Twenty-five patients (14 men, mean age 40 years) were presented with symptomatic ileal pouch-associated fistulas. Median time to pouch fistula following RPC was 6.9 years (range 1 month–20 years). Fistulas were classified as pouch-anal (n = 12, 48 %), pouch-vaginal (n = 7, 28 %), complex (n = 4, 16 %), and pouch-perineal (n = 2, 8 %). Etiology included Crohn’s disease (n = 15, 60 %), cryptoglandular (n = 6, 24 %), and anastomotic failure (n = 4, 16 %). Each patient underwent an average of 2.8 local procedures or repairs. Overall healing rate was 64 % at a median follow-up of 29 (range 2–108) months. None of the complex fistulas were healed. Postoperative pelvic sepsis, fecal diversion, anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy, and fistula etiology did not significantly impact fistula healing. Three patients required pouch excision with end ileostomy.

Conclusions

Operative treatment of pouch fistulas after RPC resulted in complete healing in 64 % of patients following a stepwise diagnostic and therapeutic approach.     

Evaluation of reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy: prospective comparative study of jejunal interposition and jejunal pouch interposition

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To prevent various distresses after proximal gastrectomy, reconstruction by interposed jejunal pouch has been advocated as an organ-preserving surgical strategy to ensure favorable quality of life for the patients. METHODOLOGY: Proximal gastrectomy was performed in 9 patients with gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Four patients were randomly selected for reconstruction by jejunal pouch interposition (JPI group), while 5 had reconstruction by jejunal interposition (JI group). The patients who underwent JPI and JI were followed up to evaluate resumption of normal diet, change in body weight, and clinical symptoms. RESULTS: The JPI group showed a significant dietary advantage. Three months after surgery, JPI patients could eat more than 80% of the volume of their preoperative meals, whereas JI patients ate less than 50%. The percentage of postoperative body weight loss was higher in the JI group than in the JPI group because the volume of the remnant stomach was more adequate in the latter. Moreover, it was easier to enter the remnant stomach and duodenum for endoscopic fiberscopy in the JPI group for the treatment of hepato-biliary pancreatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: JPI is an effective method for preservation of gastric function after proximal gastrectomy.     

Motility of the jejunum after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anastomosis

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anastomosis could modify motility of the small intestine through two mechanisms: obstruction or bacterial overgrowth. Motility of the jejunum was measured in 11 patients with ileoanal anastomosis six (n = 6), or 12 (n = 5) months after closure of the loop ileostomy. Manometric recording from the jejunum were made during fasting (four hours) and after a liquid meal (one hour). These findings were compared with those of six healthy volunteers. Motor events were classified as follows: migrating motor complex (MMC), propagated contractions, or discrete clustered contractions. All patients were investigated for bacterial overgrowth (D-glucose breath test). Only two patients had bacterial overgrowth. The frequency of MMC remained unchanged after ileo-anal anastomosis (2.83 (0.37)/four hours) compared with normal volunteers (2.81 (0.29)/four hours). During fasting, four patients had numerous propagated contractions in the jejunum. This condition was associated in two with bacterial overgrowth and in two with intubation of the reservoir. Discrete clustered contractions were found in the seven patients studied postprandially (7.6 (2.5)/h), but not in volunteers. These seven patients emptied their pouch spontaneously and bacterial overgrowth was found in only one. As this motility pattern was previously described in partial small intestinal obstruction, it is postulated that discrete clustered contractions could be the consequence of a functional obstruction as a result of anastomosis of the small intestine to the high pressure zone of the anal sphincters.     

Persistent ileitis after ileal salvage from a failed Kock pouch

A case of persistent ileitis following the refashioning of a Kock ileal pouch into a Brooke ileostomy for severe pouchitis is reported. Preserving the terminal ileum by a salvage procedure may not be a safe alternative to pouch excision with the formation of a new end ileostomy in the surgical management of pouchitis refractory to medical treatment.     

New method for jejunal pouch interposition reconstruction after distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recently pouch reconstruction has been reported to improve quality of life and functional results after surgery for gastric cancer. Although jejunal pouch reconstruction after distal gastrectomy has favorable results for patients' quality of life, it is complicated and takes a long time to complete. We developed a new technique using a linear stapling device to avoid this problem. METHODOLOGY: The duodenum and the jejunum are simultaneously divided with a 100-mm linear stapler 0.5 cm distal to the pyrolus ring and 20 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz, respectively. A 100-mm linear stapler is introduced into two approximated segments of the jejunum through two small stab wounds 10 cm and 15 cm distal to the stump, respectively, and side-to-side anastomosis is performed along the antimesenteric borders. The anterior wall of the pouch is cut along the prospective line of anastomosis with the gastric remnant. The anterior wall of the stomach is cut along the planned suture line having a length similar to that of the pouch. The posterior walls of the stomach and the jejunal pouch are placed back-to-back on the planned anastomotic line. End-to-end posterior anastomosis between the gastric remnant and the jejunal pouch is simultaneously performed with gastrectomy using a 100-mm linear stapler. End-to-end anterior anastomosis is created by hand. RESULTS: This technique has been used in 4 patients, and there have been no complications related to the pouch or anastomoses. Mean operative time was 255 +/- 37 min (range: 205-290 min). CONCLUSIONS: Shortening of operative time can be attributed to adoption of end-to-end posterior anastomosis between the stomach and the jejunal pouch using the linear stapling device simultaneously with gastrectomy.     

Neoplasia in ileal pouch mucosa after total proctocolectomy for juvenile polyposis

PURPOSE: Patients treated with restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis or ulcerative colitis occasionally develop disease in the ileal pouch similar to that originally present in the colon. We investigated the possibility of analogous involvement in the ileal pouch of juvenile polyposis patients. METHODS: Endoscopic surveillance for neoplasia throughout the gastrointestinal tract was performed, with retrieval of all polypectomy specimens for histologic classification using the criteria of Morson. RESULTS: Multiple large juvenile polyps were found in the ileal pouch of one patient less than 10 years after restorative proctocolectomy for hereditary juvenile polyposis. The pouch was much more severely affected than the proximal ileum, small intestine, or stomach. Although most polyps had a completely benign histologic appearance, three had moderate to severe dysplasia. DISCUSSION: Mucosal changes induced by bacteria or stasis of luminal contents may promote manifestation in the ileal pouch of the disease phenotype usually more evident in the colon. Patients with severe or generalized juvenile polyposis should be considered for periodic endoscopic surveillance of the ileal pouch beginning several years after restorative proctocolectomy. Supported by National Institutes of Health Grants P30 CA14520 and U01 CA59352, Bethesda, Maryland, and a Merit Review grant to Dr. Stoltenberg from the United States Department of Veteran's Affairs, Washington, D.C.     

Prediction of late-onset pouch failure in patients with restorative proctocolectomy with a nomogram

BackgroundA proportion of UC patients with restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA develop pouch failure. Accurate risk assessment is critical for making proper evaluation and treatment. Information on factors that may reliably predict pouch failure for the patients requiring referral to a specialized care unit is minimal.AimWe sought to develop and internally validate a nomogram for the prediction of late-onset pouch failure.MethodsThe study cohort included all eligible UC patients with restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA at the subspecialty Pouchitis Clinic from 2002 to 2009. Inclusion criteria were patients having: 1) inflammatory bowel disease; 2) ileal pouches; and 3) regular follow-up at the Pouchitis Clinic. Demographic and clinical variables were prospectively collected. Multivariable accelerated failure time regression model was developed to predict pouch failure defined as pouch excision or permanent diversion. Discrimination and calibration of the model were assessed following bootstrapping methods for correcting optimism, and the model was presented as a nomogram.ResultsA total of 921 patients were included for the model. The mean age for this cohort was 45.5 years old. The mean follow-up at the Pouchitis Clinic was 5.8 years. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the probabilities for pouch retention are 0.939, 0.916 and 0.907 at 3, 5 and 7 years, respectively. The predictor variables which were included in the nomogram were smoking, duration of the pouch, baseline pouch diagnosis, and pre- and post-op use of biologics. The concordance index was 0.824. The nomogram seemed well calibrated based on the calibration curve.ConclusionsThe nomogram model appeared to predict late-onset pouch failure reasonably well with satisfactory concordance index and calibration curve. The nomogram is readily applicable for clinical practice in pouch patients.     

Complication of jejunal pouch interposition after proximal gastrectomy: case report

Interposition of a jejunal pouch after proximal gastrectomy is a popular reconstruction method in Japan, because it produces a good quality of life soon after surgery. Many reports have described its usefulness. However, there are few reports describing its complications. We report here for the first time a case of pouch stasis needing surgery. A 23-year-old man underwent proximal gastrectomy with interposed jejunal pouch for traumatic strangulated diaphragmatic hernia. Three years later, he complained of persistent vomiting. Since surgery, he had eaten as much as other young people. An upper gastrointestinal series showed dilatation of the jejunal pouch and stasis of contrast medium. Since conservative therapy was not effective, surgery was performed. In the operative findings, the jejunal pouch was extremely dilated, the remaining stomach had become atrophic, and moreover, the anastomosis was severely distorted. It was considered that frequent excessive ingestion caused irreversible dilatation of the jejunal pouch, resulting in pouch stasis. Even though the jejunal pouch is interposed for reconstruction, it is very important to give nutritional guidance to patients, especially young patients, to prevent pouch stasis caused by excessive food ingestion.     

An assessment of inflammation in the reservoir after restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal ileal reservoir

The significance of inflammation of the mucosa of the ileal reservoir after restorative proctocolectomy is not known although in some cases it appears to be associated with symptoms when the condition has been referred to as pouchitis. This investigation has aimed to determined the prevalence of inflammation, to define pouchitis and to examine some factors which might be related to inflammation. Mucosal biopsies from the ileal reservoir were studied in 90 patients at up to 62 months after closure of the ileostomy. A histological grading system (0-6) was used to assess the severity of inflammation. Some degree of chronic and acute inflammation was found in 87% and 30% of cases respectively. The prevalence of a grade of 4 or more was 23% and 3.5%. There was a correlation between severity of chronic and acute inflammation. Severe histological acute inflammation (grade 4-6) was associated with sigmoidoscopic features of inflammation and with increased frequency of defaecation. Of 55 patients sigmoidoscoped by one clinician, 6 (11%) had pouchitis which was characterised by macroscopic inflammation of the reservoir, diarrhoea and a histological grade of 4 or more. The severity of chronic inflammation was not related to frequency of defaecation. Histological inflammation could not be correlated with the type of reservoir, residual volume after evacuation of a known volume of stool substitute introduced per anum into the reservoir or compliance of the reservoir. Acute inflammation was significantly more severe in patients with ulcerative colitis than in those with familial adenomatous polyposis.