乳腺导管原位癌病理形态及c-erbB-2、p53和PCNA表达

目的：对乳腺导管原位癌进行病理形态分析，并行ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２、ｐ５３癌基因蛋白、增殖细胞核抗原（ＰＣＮＡ）表达以及相关性的研究，以期为临床判断潜在恶性程度及预后提供参考指标。方法：运用病理形态分析以及枸橼酸－微波－ＡＢＣ免疫组化法对２５例常规福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋乳腺导管原位癌组织进行回顾性研究。结果：（１）２５例乳腺原位导管癌ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２、ｐ５３、ＰＣＮＡ表达的阳性率分别为３６．０％，４０．０％和４０．０％；（２）粉刺型ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２、ｐ５３、ＰＣＮＡ表达的阳性率均高于非粉刺型，而且ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２阳性率相差有显著性（Ｐ＜０．０５）；（３）坏死、核异型性、核分裂数与ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２、ｐ５３、ＰＣＮＡ的表达有关，其中，坏死与ＰＣＮＡ阳性表达显著相关（Ｐ＜０．０５），核异型性与ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２蛋白表达显著相关（Ｐ＜０．０５）。结论：乳腺导管原位癌无论病理形态还是生物学行为都是异质性的，除了组织学亚型，某些形态指标以及ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２癌基因蛋白的表达也可作为恶性度指标。     

Neuroendocrine ductal carcinoma in situ (NE-DCIS) of the breast--comparative clinicopathological study of 20 NE-DCIS cases and 274 non-NE-DCIS cases

Aims:  To clarify the clinicopathological significance of breast neuroendocrine ductal carcinoma in situ (NE-DCIS), i.e. DCIS in which >50% of cells immunohistochemically express NE markers (chromogranin A and/or synaptophysin), 20 NE-DCIS were studied and the findings compared with those of 274 non-NE-DCIS.
Methods and results:  NE-DCIS accounted for 6.8% of all DCIS. Mean patient age was 50.4 years for NE-DCIS and 49.6 years for non-NE-DCIS ( P  = 0.66). The main clinical presentation of NE-DCIS was a bloody nipple discharge, seen in 72%, significantly different from the 5% in non-NE-DCIS cases ( P  < 0.01). Carcinoma was preoperatively diagnosed in 67% of NE-DCIS and 95% of non-NE-DCIS cases ( P  < 0.01). NE-DCIS was histologically characterized by a predominantly solid growth of cancer cells with fine-granular cytoplasm and ovoid, or occasionally spindle-shaped nuclei. A well-developed vascular network was also common. Nuclear grades and Van Nuys classification were significantly lower for NE-DCIS than for non-NE-DCIS ( P  < 0.01). The mean MIB-1 labelling index was 4.3% in NE-DCIS and 8.1% in non-NE-DCIS ( P  < 0.01). Furthermore, NE-DCIS cases had significantly higher oestrogen and progesterone receptor and lower HER2 scores than non-NE-DCIS cases ( P  < 0.01).
Conclusions:  NE-DCIS has characteristic clinicopathological features and can, therefore, be regarded as a distinct variant of DCIS.     

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPCa) of the breast refers to a unique variant of invasive ductal carcinoma, but its biological behavior has not been elucidated well. We analyzed 16 IMPCa cases (10 pure type, six mixed type). The incidence of IMPCa was 1.0% of all primary breast carcinoma. High nuclear grade (75.0%), as well as poorly differentiated histological grade (81.3%), was frequently seen. Lymph node metastases were evident in 92.9% of the examined cases, and about half of them showed more than 10 positive nodes. Comparison between serially experienced invasive ductal carcinoma, not otherwise specified (IDC-NOS), revealed that both high nuclear grade and poor histological grade were significantly more frequent ( P  < 0001), there was a lower frequency of positive estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor ( P  < 0.05, P  < 0.01), a higher frequency of HER-2 overexpression ( P  < 0.025), and more frequent lymph node metastases ( P  < 0.05) in IMPCa. The comparison between lymph node positive IDC-NOS did not show any statistically significant differences in frequency for positive p53, matrix metalloproteinase protein-2 (MMP-2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or E-cadherin. However, IMPCa showed a significantly increased number of blood vessels counted by CD34 immunostains ( P  < 0.05). These results suggest that IMPCa is, at least, the same or more aggressive than lymph node positive cases of IDC-NOS. Hence, not only the high incidence of lymph node metastases but also distant, blood-borne metastases may be important.     

Cyclin D1 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ, atypical ductal hyperplasia and usual ductal hyperplasia: an immunohistochemical study

The cell cycle regulatory gene, Cyclin D1, plays a critical role in the growth and progression of several types of human cancer, including breast cancer. Immunohistochemical study of Cyclin D1 expression has been extensively reported in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). In contrast, there have been few reports concerning Cyclin D1 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and their positive rates are variable. The differences in the reported frequency may be largely due to the differences in antibodies used, immunohistochemical methods and the positive cut-off point. However, we speculated that the strictness of diagnosis of DCIS might be somewhat responsible for these differences in frequency. Therefore, we selected cases of DCIS by carefully eliminating cases of predominantly intraductal carcinoma (PIC). Moreover, to clarify whether Cyclin D1 expression is involved in multistep carcinogenesis or the progression of human breast cancer, we immunohistochemically investigated Cyclin D1 expression in 57 DCIS, 10 atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), 70 usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), 44 PIC and 92 IDC. Cyclin D1 expression was detected in 41 DCIS cases (72%), 22 PIC cases (50%) and 40 IDC cases (43%). No expression of Cyclin D1 was observed in either ADH or UDH. There were no significant correlations between Cyclin D1 expression and histological grade or estrogen receptor expression in DCIS. These results suggest that Cyclin D1 expression may play an important role in the early stages of carcinogenesis, and that immunohistochemical detection of Cyclin D1 expression may be helpful in differentiating low-grade DCIS from ADH.     

乳腺小管癌与浸润性导管癌中NY-BR-1表达的对比观察

目的 探讨乳腺癌分化抗原NY-BR-1在乳腺小管癌中的表达,并与其在浸润性导管癌中表达进行对比.方法 收集29例小管癌和101例浸润性导管癌石蜡标本,采用免疫组化PV-9000通用型两步法分别进行NY-BR-1、ER、PR、Her-2、Ki-67、nm23、MDR-1及LRP的研究.结果 NY-BR-1在乳腺小管癌和浸润性导管癌中的表达率分别为51.7%、49.5%.NY-BR-1与组织学分化程度密切相关,其在浸润性导管癌组织学Ⅰ～Ⅲ级的阳性率逐渐降低分别为60%、52%、17%.NY-BR-1在小管癌中的表达明显高于浸润性乳腺癌组织学Ⅲ级的表达,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).NY-BR-1在小管癌和Luminal A型乳腺癌中的表达无差异,在小管癌和浸润性导管癌组织学Ⅰ、Ⅱ级中的表达无差异.NY-BR-1与ER(rs=0.286,P=0.004)、PR(rs=0.252,P=0.010)的表达呈正相关.结论 作为分化抗原的一种,NY-BR-1在低分化的高级别癌中的表达率低,而在高分化的低级别癌中的表达率高.本研究结果显示NY-BR-1在小管癌和低级别浸润性导管癌中的表达率相似,提示小管癌与低级别、luminal型乳腺癌之间具有相似的组织学分化程度.     

The expression pattern of MUC1 (EMA) is related to tumour characteristics and clinical outcome in 'pure' ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

AIMS: To classify MUC1 according to five predefined expression patterns in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and related clinicopathological parameters, coexpression of other biological markers and prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: With a manual tissue arrayer, 92% (n = 80) of the 87 DCIS samples were successfully targeted. Immunohistochemistry was carried out for MUC1, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Her2/Neu, p53 and cyclin D1. Entire membrane expression was related to Her2/neu negativity (P =0.042). Apical membrane expression was associated with low grade (P = 0.027), Her2/neu negativity (P = 0.014) and PR positivity (P = 0.005). Focal cytoplasmic expression was related to high grade (P = 0.006). Diffuse cytoplasmic expression was associated with high grade (P = 0.004), large tumour size (P = 0.046), Her2/neu positivity (P =0.042) and cyclin D1 positivity (P = 0.002). On the basis of these analyses the four patterns were reclassified as membranous or cytoplasmic expression. On multivariate analysis, cytoplasmic MUC1 expression (hazard ratio 8.5, 95% confidence interval 1.0, 73.0; P = 0.04) was the only independent predictor of local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Four patterns of MUC1 expression are recognized in DCIS that suggest a relationship to functional differentiation and can be simplified into two types that are clinically relevant and could therefore be helpful in the distinction between different subgroups of DCIS.     

Pleomorphic carcinoma of the breast: clinicopathological analysis of 26 cases of an unusual high-grade phenotype of ductal carcinoma

AIMS: Pleomorphic carcinoma is a poorly described entity whose phenotype is not well recognized as within the morphological spectrum of breast carcinoma. The purpose of this report is to describe the clinicopathological features of this tumour, and to promote its recognition as an unusual high-grade morphological variant of mammary ductal carcinoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: Histological slides of breast carcinomas (N = 64) coded between 1978 and 1995 as having pleomorphic or anaplastic features were reviewed. Pleomorphic carcinoma (N = 26) was diagnosed when > or = 50% of the tumour manifested a pleomorphic cell population (> sixfold variation in nuclear size). Tumours of lobular origin were excluded. All neoplasms occurred in women with a mean age of 53 years. Patients underwent biopsy and/or mastectomy (n = 24) or lumpectomy (n = 2). The tumours' mean size was 54 mm. All were high-grade neoplasms. The pleomorphic cell population comprised 50-100% of the tumour; 31% had a prominent spindled morphology. Fifty-eight per cent of the tumours were initially misclassified by referring pathologists as sarcomas or carcinomas, possibly metastatic. Adjacent DCIS or a transition to classic ductal carcinoma was present in 73%. Five (19%) patients were stage I and three (12%) had stage IV disease. Axillary dissections yielded > or = 3 (mean 7.2) positive lymph nodes in 52%. Most (68%) tumours were aneuploid; a high S-phase (> 10%) was present in 63%. All neoplasms were ER negative and all but one were PR negative. p53 expression was present in 71%; none expressed bcl-2. c-erbB-2 was detected in four (19%) node-positive and in 0 (0%) node-negative cases (P = 0.01). Of 16 patients with follow-up, 6 (38%) were disease-free (mean, 74 months), four (25%) alive with disease (mean, 33 months) and six (38%) dead of disease at a mean of 22 months. CONCLUSIONS: Pleomorphic carcinoma is a prognostically unfavourable lesion and represents the extreme end of the morphological spectrum of grade III infiltrating ductal carcinoma.     

The expression pattern of MUC1 (EMA) is related to tumour characteristics and clinical outcome of invasive ductal breast carcinoma

AIMS: To clarify MUC1 patterns in invasive ductal breast carcinoma and to relate them to clinicopathological parameters, coexpression of other biological markers and prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Samples from 243 consecutive patients with primary ductal carcinoma were incorporated into tissue microarrays (TMAs). Slides were stained for MUC1, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Her2/neu, p53 and cyclin D1. Apical membrane MUC1 expression was associated with smaller tumours (P = 0.001), lower tumour grades (P < 0.001), PR positivity (P = 0.003) and increased overall survival (OS; P = 0.030). Diffuse cytoplasmic MUC1 expression was associated with cyclin D1 positivity (P = 0.009) and increased relapse-free survival (RFS; P = 0.034). Negativity for MUC1 was associated with ER negativity (P = 0.004), PR negativity (P = 0.001) and cyclin D1 negativity (P = 0.009). In stepwise multivariate analysis MUC1 negativity was an independent predictor of both RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5, 8.5; P = 0.005] and OS (HR 14.7, 95% CI 4.9, 44.1; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The expression pattern of MUC1 in invasive ductal breast carcinoma is related to tumour characteristics and clinical outcome. In addition, negative MUC1 expression is an independent risk factor for poor RFS and OS, besides 'classical' prognostic indicators.     

Stromal metachromasia: a marker for areas of incipient invasion in ductal carcinoma of the breast?

This morphological study of small ducts with in situ breast carcinoma demonstrates the changes that occur in the adjacent stroma when it stains metachromatically with toluidine blue. They are indistinguishable from those reported in areas with infiltrative tumour growth, and are accompanied by progressive damage to the duct wall. The latter may be destroyed as a result of this reaction that starts in the stroma, the tumour cells being thus provided with a possible means of escape from their in situ localization. This interpretation is in contrast to accepted teaching that the factors that facilitate infiltration are provided by the tumor cells. The observation is also of potential diagnostic interest.     

乳腺导管内癌分子分型应用研究

目的 采用免疫组织化学检测方法 对乳腺导管内癌进行分子分型.方法 收集50例乳腺导管内癌存档蜡块,用单克隆抗体CK5/6、CK8、CK18、34βE12、p63、S-100、SMA、CD10、CD117、EGFR、ER、PR和HER2进行免疫组织化学EnVision法染色,按照免疫表型分为5种类型:腺腔A型(ER+/PR+/HER2-)、腺腔B型(ER+/PR+/HER2+)、正常乳腺样型(ER-/PR-/HER2-且不表达基底/肌上皮标记及EGFR)、HER2过表达型(ER-/PR-/HER2+)和基底细胞样型(ER-/PR-/HER2-,且至少表达一种基底型角蛋白和(或)肌上皮标记物或EGFR).结果 腺腔A型16例(32%),腺腔B型19例(38%),HER2过表达型13例(26%),基底细胞样型2例(4%),无正常乳腺型.2例基底细胞样型,均表达CK5/6、CD117,例1同时表达SMA,例2表达CK8、CK18、34βE12、S-100,均为高级别导管内癌.结论 乳腺导管内癌可按免疫表型进行分子分型,部分导管内癌具有与基底细胞样癌相同的免疫表型,可能是基底细胞样癌的前驱病变,其诊断依赖于免疫组化检测.     

Usual ductal hyperplasia of the breast is a committed stem (progenitor) cell lesion distinct from atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ

Current classification systems in proliferative mammary gland pathology are based on a two-cell system, recognizing only glandular and myoepithelial lines of differentiation. A third cell type has recently been characterized in normal breast tissue by double-immunofluorescence analysis to express cytokeratin 5 (Ck5) only. These cells were shown to represent progenitor or adult stem cells that give rise to the glandular and myoepithelial cell lineage. The double-labelling technique has been applied to characterize a spectrum of intraductal epithelial proliferations, namely benign usual ductal hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia, and ductal carcinoma in situ, all of which are thought to represent the gradual steps of a sequence in the development of breast cancer. Immunofluorescence studies with specific antibodies against Ck5, Ck8/18/19, and smooth muscle actin were complemented by western blotting analysis of Ck5 and Ck8/18/19 expression in normal breast tissue and in proliferative lesions. Usual ductal hyperplasia appears to be a Ck5-positive committed stem (progenitor) cell lesion with the same differentiation potential as seen in the normal breast. This is in sharp contrast to atypical ductal hyperplasia/ductal carcinoma in situ, which display the differentiated glandular immunophenotype (Ck8/18/19-positive, but Ck5-negative). These data require the abandonment of the idea of an obligate biological continuum of intraductal proliferations from benign to malignant. This study provides evidence that cells undergoing malignant transformation tend to be fairly advanced in the glandular lineage of differentiation. The committed stem (progenitor) cell model may contribute to a better understanding of both benign proliferative breast disease and breast cancer development.     

Expression of maspin is up-regulated during the progression of mammary ductal carcinoma

AIMS: The tumour suppressor gene maspin is reported to inhibit the motility, invasiveness and metastasis of breast cancer cells. Maspin is expressed in normal mammary myoepithelial cells but is down-regulated during the progression of ductal carcinoma. However, we recently reported that maspin expression was frequently observed in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) with an aggressive phenotype, and it was a strong indicator of a poor prognosis. To our knowledge, to date, there has been no report investigating maspin expression in a large series of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS AND RESULTS: To clarify whether there is down-regulation during the progression of ductal carcinoma, we immunohistochemically investigated the expression of maspin in 145 DCIS, 92 invasive ductal carcinomas with a predominant intraductal component as well as 94 usual ductal hyperplasias and 27 atypical ductal hyperplasias. The expression of maspin in carcinoma cells was observed in 9.6% (14 of 145) of DCIS and 18.5% (17 of 92) of IDC with a predominant intraductal components. It significantly correlated with larger tumour size (P = 0.013; P = 0.042), higher histological grade (P = 0.015; P = 0.0003) and the presence of comedo-necrosis (P = 0.000005; P = 0.0074) in DCIS and IDC with a predominant intraductal components, respectively. In epithelial cells, the expression of maspin was observed in only one case of usual ductal hyperplasia, and all cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia were negative. CONCLUSIONS: These results and our previous investigation in which 27.4% of IDC were positive for maspin suggest that the expression of maspin in epithelial cells could be up-regulated during the progression of ductal carcinoma, and that it could be correlated with the acquisition of an aggressive phenotype.     

A critical appraisal of six modern classifications of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS): correlation with grade of associated invasive carcinoma

The in-situ component of 180 cases of screen detected infiltrating duct carcinoma of the breast was classified according to six published classifications for ductal carcinoma in situ based on architecture, necrosis and cytology. All cases were assessed independently by two experienced observers to assess inter-observer variation. The differentiation of ductal carcinoma in situ as assessed by all the classification systems correlated with the grade of the associated invasive carcinoma (chi-squared between 50 and 107: P <0.0001). Disagreements were commonest in the assessment of architecture and least common in the assessment of necrosis. For cytonuclear grade most disagreements (62.2%) involved the distinction between low and intermediate as against 33.9% disagreements for intermediate vs. high. Nuclear grade alone and necrosis alone were correlated with the grade of invasive carcinoma associated with the ductal carcinoma in situ and the Nottingham prognostic index of the patient. The Van Nuys classification of ductal carcinoma in situ is commended because it has a low inter-observer disagreement, is significantly correlated with the grade of the infiltrating carcinoma, uses simple well-defined criteria (with no requirement for percentage estimations), is applicable to small numbers of ducts and, most importantly, appears to correlate with disease-free survival.     

Cytological criteria for the diagnosis of intraductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma of the breast

The advent of mammography screening presents a diagnostic challenge to the cytopathologist as an increasing proportion of breast lesions requiring investigation will be nonpalpable and up to 40% will be accounted for by atypical intraductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ, as opposed to previously, when these lesions represented less than 10% of palpable tumors. We studied 133 fine-needle aspirates from breast tumors and found that nuclear morphology, myoepithelial cells, signs of invasion, and degree of cellular dissociation are among the most potent factors discriminating between benign epithelial proliferations, atypical intraductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma.     

Recognizing breast ductal carcinoma in situ on fine‐needle aspiration: A diagnostic dilemma

In this study, we evaluated cytomorphologic features of different subgroups of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); we compared seven cytologic features between DCIS and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) aspirates to determine whether diagnosis of stromal invasion can be made based on fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) findings. There were 142 cases of DCIS and 1,978 cases of IDC enrolled in our study. FNA analysis revealed 80.3% sensitivity for DCIS and 94.7% sensitivity for IDC. High and intermediate grade DCIS exhibited marked nuclear abnormality (92.1% vs. 35.7%, 30.0%; P1 < 0.001, P2 < 0.001) and necrosis (69.7% vs. 0%, 10.0%; P1 < 0.001, P2 = 0.001) in a higher percentage of cases compared to low grade DCIS and intraductal/intracystic papillary carcinoma. The rates of background macrophages (71.3% for DCIS and 21.9% for IDC, P < 0.001) and extensive necrosis (54.0% for DCIS and 16.7% for IDC, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in DCIS compared to IDC. Lymphocytes were observed in conjunction with tumor cells more frequently in IDC (81.3%) compared to DCIS (36.8%, P < 0.001). Stromal fragments associated with tumor cells were only observed in invasive lesions (11.9% micro‐invasive DCIS and 52.1% IDC). Tubular structures were found exclusively in IDC (11.5%). Cytologic criteria for diagnosis of high and low grade DCIS are different. The suspicion of DCIS is raised when background macrophages and extensive necrosis are observed. Stromal invasion is suggested by FNA if lymphocytes are entwined around tumor cells or if stromal fragments associated with tumor cells or tubular structures are observed. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013;41:710–715. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Combined evaluation of CK5/6, ER, p63, and MUC3 for distinguishing breast intraductal papilloma from ductal carcinoma in situ

The differentiation of intraductal papilloma (IDP) in the breast from ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is sometimes difficult. Fifty papillary lesions (25 DCIS and 25 IDP) were immunohistochemically examined using a panel of antibodies, including CK5/6, ER, p63, Ki-67, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, neuron specific enolase, CD56, MUC1, MUC3, CD44, p21, p27, and p53. The immunohistochemical staining pattern of each antibody was evaluated using the Allred scoring system. Then, the area under curve (AUC) for each antibody was computed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. DCIS typically showed high scores for ER and MUC3 reactivity compared with IDP, and the AUC for ER and MUC3 were 0.941 and 0.908, respectively. In contrast, IDP showed high scores for CK5/6 and p63 reactivity compared with DCIS, and the AUC for CK5/6 and p63 were 1.00 and 0.954, respectively. We devised a 'Differential Index' (DI) using the following formula: [S(ER) + S(MUC3)]/[S(CK5/6) + S(p63) + 1]. The distributions of the DI for IDP and DCIS did not overlap when the cutoff value was placed arbitrarily at DI = 1.0. From these results, it is concluded that a panel of four CK5/6, ER, p63, and MUC3 antibodies provide valuable information for differentiating IDP from DCIS.     

HER2 status in pure ductal carcinoma in situ and in the intraductal and invasive components of invasive ductal carcinoma determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry

AIM: To determine the HER2 status of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast. The increased prevalence of HER2 amplification and overexpression in DCIS is considered to be maintained in the intraductal component of IDC; however, HER2 amplification and overexpression are detected much less in IDC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed to detect HER2 in 270 IDCs with an intraductal component and in 50 pure DCIS samples; IHC was also performed in 116 metastatic nodes. HER2 was found to be amplified in 77 cases (28.5%) and overexpressed in 79 (29.3%) of the 270 IDCs. HER2 amplification was similar between intraductal and invasive components of the same tumour. The concordance for HER2 status between invasive and intraductal components of individual tumours was 98.5% and 99.3% by FISH and IHC, respectively. HER2 was amplified in 25 (50%) of the 50 pure DCIS samples. HER2 overexpression in metastatic nodes resembled the HER2 status in the primary tumour for 108 (93.1%) of 116 cases (kappa =0.831). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that the intraductal component of IDC may differ biologically when compared with pure DCIS. HER2 appears to lack a critical role in the progression from DCIS to IDC and HER2 status is maintained in metastatic lesions.     

Oestrogen receptor negativity as a marker for high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

AIMS: To compare the morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative and ER-positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast, in an attempt to establish more objective criteria for the classification of DCIS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sections of 64 cases of in-situ carcinoma of the breast were stained for ER, progesterone receptors (PgR), androgen receptors (AR), c-erbB-2 and p53, using the immunoperoxidase technique. The cases included 60 DCIS and four lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Four DCIS lesions were associated with foci of microinvasion. The 60 DCIS cases included 31 high grade, 23 intermediate grade and six low grade. Twenty-four DCIS cases (40%) were ER-negative and 36 were positive. ER negativity was significantly associated with high nuclear grade (88% versus 27% for ER-positive cases, P < 0.001), PgR negativity (100% versus 25%, P < 0.001), c-erbB-2 positivity (79% versus 14%, P < 0.001) and p53 positivity (58% versus 6%, P < 0.001). There was no difference between ER-negative and -positive DCIS as regards AR expression, with 91% of cases in each group being AR-positive. Of the four cases of DCIS with microinvasion, three were ER- and PgR-negative, all four were c-erbB-2-positive and AR-positive and one was p53-positive. None of the four LCIS was ER, PgR or AR-negative and none was c-erbB-2- or p53-positive. CONCLUSIONS: There is a highly significant direct relationship between ER negativity in DCIS and high nuclear grade, PgR negativity and c-erbB-2 and p53 positivity. We suggest that immunohistological assessment of ER status may help in providing a more objective way of classifying DCIS.