The relation of hand functions with radiological damage and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis

The purpose of this study was to investigate specifically the correlation of hand functions determined by Duruoz hand index (DHI) with radiological findings and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Forty-eight RA patients were evaluated with DHI questionnaire, disease activity score (DAS) 28 and modified Larsen scoring method. Correlation between DAS-28 and DHI was assessed in all the patients. Mean DHI scores were compared between patients in remission (DAS-28 < 2.6) and patients who have more or less disease activity (DAS-28 ≥ 2.6). To exclude the probable conflicting effect of disease activity on hand functions, the correlation between radiological scores and DHI was investigated only in patients with remission. There was a positive correlation between DAS-28 and DHI in all patients group (r = 0.434, P < 0.002). No correlation between the radiological scores of any joint groups and DHI could be found in patients with remission. Hand functions seemed to be affected prominently from disease activity. Radiological scores demonstrating joint damage were not in relation with hand functions.     

Is hand bone mineral density a marker for hand function in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis? The correlation among bone mineral density of the hand, radiological findings and hand function

The objective of this study is to assess the role of hand bone mineral density (BMD) as a prospective marker for hand function and the correlation of hand BMD with X-ray findings and hand functioning in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Eighty-three female patients diagnosed with RA were enrolled. All BMD measurements were performed on both hands. The radiological evaluation was conducted according to the van der Heijde modification of the Sharp method (Sharp/van der Heijde). Duruöz Hand Index (DHI) was used to establish the disability in the hands. Furthermore, handgrip strength (HGS), pinch strength (PS), lateral pinch (LP), tip-to-tip pinch (TTP) and three-fingered pinch (TFP) on both the dominant and the non-dominant hands was measured. A significant positive correlation between hand BMD and HGS as well as all PSs with p?<?0.05 was observed, while no statistically significant relation was observed between BMD and DHI (p?>?0.05). The hand BMD and the Sharp/van der Heijde scores were significantly in reverse correlation (p?<?0.05). As for other DHI-related variants, HGS and PS and the total DHI scores were reversely correlated, while there was a positive significant association with radiological scores (p?<?0.05). HGS and TTP were found significant (p?<?0.05) as a result of a multivariant linear stepwise regression analysis among the sub-groups of DHI, HGS, LP, TTP, TFP and radiographic total scores. Our study demonstrated that a one-off hand BMD measurement failed to adequately indicate a loss in hand function as measured by DHI. Ultimately, HGS and TTP were shown to be the most effective indicators for measuring hand functions.     

Reliability and validity of the Duruoz Hand Index in persons with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma)

OBJECTIVE: To examine the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the Duruoz Hand Index (DHI) in persons with scleroderma. METHODS: Forty patients with scleroderma and no other major medical problems completed the DHI at 2 points in time to assess test-retest reliability. To assess validity, participants were administered the Arthritis Hand Function Test (AHFT), the Hand Mobility in Scleroderma Test (HAMIS), and the Keital Function Test (KFT), all performance-based tests. In addition, participants completed the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), a self report of functional ability. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability intraclass correlation coefficients for the DHI ranged from 0.81 to 0.97. Scores on the DHI did not correlate with HAMIS scores, but were significantly correlated with scores from the KFT (rs = 0.48, P < 0.01), HAQ (rs = 0.79, P < 0.01), and all sections of the AHFT (rs = 0.34-0.60, P < 0.05-0.01). CONCLUSION: The results from this study show the DHI to be a reliable and valid test for persons with scleroderma.     

Correlation of single time-point damage scores with observed progression of radiographic damage during the first 6 years of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: Aggressive treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is recommended to prevent irreversible joint damage. We evaluated the usefulness of single time-point joint radiographs for deciding whether early RA is erosive or nonerosive. METHODS: In an observational study, 179 patients with recent onset of RA symptoms (median 5.1 mo), positive rheumatoid factor, and active polyarthritis had 2 to 8 radiographic observations of hands, wrists, and forefeet during 6 to 60 months of followup. Linear regression lines for all available radiographs were used to determine progression rates of total Sharp score (TSS), erosion score (ES), and joint space narrowing score (JSNS) of each patient. RESULTS: Using the average of 2 readers' scores, intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.97 and smallest detectable difference was 3.07 for ES, 0.93 and 7.52 for JSNS, and 0.90 and 12.71 for TSS. Mean progression rates per year were 1.20 (ES), 0.67 (JSNS), and 1.85 (TSS). Single time-point radiographs taken within 6 months of symptom onset did not correlate with progression rates (r = 0.01 to 0.07); between 7 and 18 months correlations were weak (r = 0.23 to 0.35), but were better for ES between 19 and 72 months (r = 0.60 to 0.81). Among 53 patients (31%) with no progression of TSS, only 10 of them had zero scores at baseline. Among all 630 radiographs with TSS > or = 1, 25% were associated with progression rates < or = 0. CONCLUSION: Erosion scores of single radiographic examinations done > 18 months after onset of RA symptoms correlated with progression rates, but earlier radiographs did not sufficiently predict erosive or nonerosive status to guide disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment decisions.     

Association of early radiographic damage with impaired physical function in rheumatoid arthritis: a ten-year, longitudinal observational study in 238 patients

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the longitudinal relationship between physical disability, disease activity, and radiographic damage over 10 years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A cohort of 238 consecutively enrolled RA patients from the European Research on Incapacitating Disease and Social Support study (age range 20-70 years, mean disease duration 2.3 years, 68% rheumatoid factor [RF] positive) was followed up longitudinally for 10 years. Assessments at baseline and at years 1, 2, 5, and 10 comprised review of demographic variables, measurement of disease activity with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), functional evaluations using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and grip strength (average value of the right and left hand), and radiographs of the hands scored by the van der Heijde modification of the Sharp method. Marginal modeling by generalized estimating equations was used to study the longitudinal relationship between the ESR and modified Sharp radiographic damage score with respect to explaining the HAQ score and grip strength. Age, sex, RF status, and disease duration were entered as covariates. RESULTS: The HAQ score and grip strength were longitudinally associated with the momentary modified Sharp/van der Heijde score as well as with progression in this score, independent of the ESR. Therefore, an increase of 10 units in the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score will result in a 0.03-unit increase in HAQ score and a 0.95-kg decrease in grip strength, after adjustment for the ESR. CONCLUSION: This 10-year observational study provides evidence that both radiographic damage and disease activity are independent contributors to impaired physical function in RA, both early and late in the disease process.     

Long-term course and outcome of functional capacity in rheumatoid arthritis: the effect of disease activity and radiologic damage over time.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the evolution of functional capacity, disease activity, and joint destruction over time in a 12-year prospective cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and to study the relative contribution of disease activity and joint destruction to the loss of functional capacity. METHODS: One hundred thirty-two female patients with recent-onset RA were assessed at 0, 3, 6, and 12 years of followup for functional capacity (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] score), disease activity (Disease Activity Score [DAS]), and joint destruction (Sharp score of radiologic damage). RESULTS: The Sharp score deteriorated steadily over time, while the HAQ score and DAS showed a variable course. The DAS correlated strongly with the HAQ score throughout the disease course. The correlation between the Sharp score and the HAQ score was weak at study start, but became strong after 12 years. After 12 years of followup, disease activity was the main determinant of the HAQ score when entered in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Functional capacity is strongly influenced by disease activity throughout the course of RA. Even in longstanding RA, disease activity proves to be the main determinant of the HAQ score for functional capacity.     

Screening for atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of two in vivo tests of vascular function

OBJECTIVE: Inflammation appears to play a central role in atherosclerosis, and endothelial damage mediated by systemic inflammation may contribute to the increased cardiovascular mortality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and pulse wave analysis (PWA) are measures of vascular function. The aim of this study was to determine if FMD and PWA are abnormal in patients with RA. METHODS: Twenty-five RA patients and 25 matched healthy controls were studied. All were free of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. FMD was measured in all subjects. PWA was performed in 18 RA patients and 18 controls, with results expressed as large and small artery compliance (C1 and C2). Modified Sharp scores were calculated in 13 RA patients. RESULTS: Results (mean +/- SD) in RA patients and controls, respectively, were as follows: FMD 107.6 +/- 4.6% versus 108.5 +/- 4.1% (P = 0.49), C1 14.8 +/- 2.8 ml/mm Hg x 10 versus 17.9 +/- 3.1 ml/mm Hg x 10 (P = 0.0033), C2 4.5 +/- 2.3 ml/mm Hg x 100 versus 7.7 +/- 3.7 ml/mm Hg x 100 (P = 0.0039). There was an inverse correlation between C2 and modified Sharp scores in the RA patients (Spearman's rho -0.69, P = 0.0085). CONCLUSION: FMD was normal in these RA patients, whereas arterial compliance was markedly reduced. PWA appears to be a more sensitive measure of vascular dysfunction than FMD in RA and may be the preferred surrogate marker of vascular dysfunction in longitudinal studies of RA patients. The inverse correlation between C2 and the modified Sharp score, a measure that reflects disease activity over time, supports the notion that chronic inflammation plays a role in RA-associated atherosclerosis.     

The links between joint damage and disability in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: The characteristic joint damage and disability of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) increase slowly over 10-20 yr. Although it is generally believed that persisting inflammatory synovitis causes joint damage and subsequent disability, the strength of their relationship has not been systematically evaluated. This review describes their progression and interrelationship in treated RA. METHODS: MEDLINE and Current Contents databases were searched for the combined terms of rheumatoid arthritis AND X-rays, Health Assessment Questionnaire, slow-acting anti-rheumatic drugs and all identifiable synonyms. This search identified 1303 articles and from these we evaluated in detail 23 reports on the progression of joint damage, 12 reports on the progression of disability and 25 reports dealing with their interrelationship. Additional information was obtained from four data sets comprising 725 RA patients studied cross-sectionally and 33-126 cases followed prospectively for 1-5 yr. X-ray damage was primarily assessed by Larsen and Sharp indices, and disability by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). RESULTS: Joint damage and disability both increase throughout the duration of RA. Although disability (HAQ score) is correlated with disease duration (correlation coefficients between 0.27 and 0.30), the link between X-ray damage and disability is stronger (correlation coefficients between 0.30 and 0.70). In the earliest phases of RA, X-ray damage and HAQ scores are not related. By 5-8 yr, there are significant correlations with correlation coefficients between 0.30 and 0.50. In late RA (>8 yr), most studies show highly significant correlations between 0.30 and 0.70. CONCLUSIONS: Joint damage progresses constantly over the first 20 yr of RA. It accounts for approximately 25% of disability in established RA. The link between damage and disability is strongest in late (>8 yr) RA. However, avoiding or reducing joint damage in both early and established/late RA is likely to maintain function.     

Evaluation of hand function in patients undergoing long term haemodialysis

OBJECTIVE: Haemodialysis is associated with the deposition of beta(2) microglobulin in musculoskeletal structures, leading to the syndrome of dialysis related amyloidosis and impairment of hand function. This study aimed at assessing hand function using the Sollerman test in a cross section of patients undergoing haemodialysis. METHODS: Recipients of haemodialysis underwent the Sollerman test of hand grip function, which assesses 20 activities of daily living using eight grip types, and the JAMAR grip strength test, visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain (VAS-P) and function (VAS-F), and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) were determined. Results-Thirty five subjects (26 male), with mean age 53.2 years, participated. The average duration of haemodialysis was 6.2 years (range one month to 25 years). The median Sollerman score was 77, with 19/35 (54%) patients receiving haemodialysis having a score below the lower normal value of 78-80. The log Sollerman score correlated poorly with age (rs=0.16, p=0.35), and significantly with the HAQ score (r(s)=-0.66, p<0.00005), duration of haemodialysis (rs=-0.39, p<0.05), VAS-F (rs=-0.41, p<0.05), VAS-P (rs=-0.34, p<0.05), and JAMAR score (rs=0.57, p<0.05). Sollerman scores were highly correlated between dominant and non-dominant hands (rs=0.69, p<000005). CONCLUSIONS: Hand dysfunction is a common finding among patients undergoing long term haemodialysis. The Sollerman test accurately reflects patient function as measured by HAQ, VAS-F, and grip strength, but less so pain. Its use for the early detection of dialysis related amyloidosis and in the serial monitoring of the effects of hand treatment programmes is encouraged.     

Responsiveness of the Cochin rheumatoid hand disability scale after surgery

OBJECTIVE: To assess the responsiveness of the Cochin functional disability scale for the rheumatoid hand after surgery. METHOD: In a prospective study, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) scheduled for surgery of the wrist and/or fingers were evaluated within 48 h before surgery and at least 6 months after surgery. Clinical outcome measures included duration of morning stiffness, total score for tenderness, total score for swelling, visual analogue scale score for pain in the hands and wrists, a score for overall mobility of the wrist and the fingers, grip and pinch strength, the Hand Functional Index (HFI), the Kapandji index and the Cochin scale. Responsiveness was assessed with the paired t-test, the effect size (ES), the standardized response mean (SRM) and the non-parametric Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r(S)). RESULTS: Fifty patients (42 women) were evaluated twice at an interval of 7.16 +/- 2.10 months (mean +/- s.d.) (range 6-15 months). Thirty-six patients (72%) were very satisfied or satisfied with the results of surgery, seven (14%) were not satisfied or dissatisfied and seven (14%) were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. The Cochin scale score improved at the second visit (P < 0.0001), with SRM and ES values of 0.66 and 0.58 respectively. The correlation of the change in Cochin score with patient overall satisfaction was r(S) = 0.40. Among the impairment measures, grip strength showed the best responsiveness (SRM = - 0.43, ES = - 0.36, correlation with patient overall satisfaction r(S) = 0.46). The change in Kapandji index had the best correlation (r(S) = 0.51) with patient overall satisfaction but its SRM and ES values were low (- 0.19 and - 0.10 respectively). CONCLUSION: The Cochin scale is responsive and appropriate for the assessment of the effects of surgical treatments on disability in RA hands.     

Assessing disability and quality of life in systemic sclerosis: construct validities of the Cochin Hand Function Scale, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Systemic Sclerosis HAQ, and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey

OBJECTIVE: To assess the construct validity of the Cochin Hand Function Scale (CHFS) and the relevance of using aggregate scores for the scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (sHAQ) and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: We evaluated 50 patients with SSc (mean +/- SD age and disease duration 54 +/- 12 years and 9 +/- 8 years, respectively), of which 26 had limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and 23 diffuse SSc (dSSc). Quality of life was assessed by the SF-36, global disability by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and sHAQ, and hand disability by the CHFS. Construct validity was assessed by convergent and divergent validity (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient) and factor analysis. RESULTS: The CHFS had good construct validity and its total score explained 75% of the variance of the HAQ. The HAQ had better construct validity than the aggregate sHAQ and their scores correlated well (r = 0.88). The aggregate sHAQ was no better than the HAQ in discriminating between lcSSc and dSSc. SF-36 physical and mental components had acceptable convergent and divergent validity. Factor analysis of the 8 subscales extracted 3 factors explaining 72% of the variance, which differed from the a priori stratification with physical and mental subscales extracted in the same factor. CONCLUSION: In patients with SSc, the CHFS has good construct validity, the HAQ should be preferred over the aggregate sHAQ for assessing physical functioning, and use of SF-36 physical and mental components aggregate scores is questionable.     

Radiographic hand joint space width assessed by computer is a sensitive measure of change in early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in the computerized measurement of radiographic hand joint space width (JSW) to changes in modified Sharp scores in a retrospective 2-year study of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: First and last standard clinical hand radiographs of 245 patients with RA were analyzed blind using purpose-written computer software to measure changes in JSW for proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints in the 3 middle fingers of each hand. Before measurement, the radiographs were scored independently by 2 radiologists using a modification of Sharp scoring. RESULTS: The paired changes in JSW (-0.051 +/- 0.005 mm) and Sharp score (+3.81 +/- 0.50) were both significant over the study duration. In measured joints showing an increase in joint space narrowing (JSN) score, 92% had a corresponding reduction in JSW. In patients with an increase in total score, including JSN and erosion scores in fingers and wrists, 84% had a corresponding reduction in mean (PIP + MCP) JSW. Patients with no change in Sharp score (47%) still experienced a significant reduction in measured JSW (-0.027 +/- 0.006 mm). HLA-DR genetic markers of severe disease progression were associated with significantly greater reductions in JSW but not increases in Sharp score. (Values: mean +/- standard error of mean). CONCLUSION: Measured JSW averaged over 6 PIP and 6 MCP joints was a valid and more sensitive measure of change than total Sharp score in this study of early RA.     

Clinical characteristics of an anatomical hand index measured in patients with rheumatoid arthritis as a potential outcome measure

OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical characteristics of an anatomical hand index previously reported as a potential measure of joint deformity and outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: The hand index (open hand span - closed hand span/lateral height of the hand) was measured in a cross-sectional study of 145 out-patients with rheumatoid arthritis with disease durations 0-55 yr. Subsets of patients were restudied at mean follow-ups of approximately 9 months and 4 yr. RESULTS: The hand index fell gradually with disease duration. Correlations were demonstrated with the Sharp index (r = - 0.39, P = 0.000) and to a lesser extent with disease activity score (r = - 0.28, P = 0.001). At 260 +/- 115 days the hand index worsened by 0.09 units (P = 0.09, NS). At 51.6 +/- 5.4 months the index showed a fall from 1.96 +/- 0.73 to 1.61 +/- 0.65 (P = 0.000). During the same interval the Sharp index increased from 60 +/- 68 to 80 +/- 71 (P = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of simple hand dimensions can demonstrate worsening of hand deformity with time in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We suggest that more sophisticated analysis of digital hand images, as used in our original study, might yield additional information and increase the sensitivity of an anatomical hand index as an outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis.     

Hand bone densitometry in rheumatoid arthritis,a five year longitudinal study: an outcome measure and a prognostic marker

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether hand bone mineral content (BMC) measurement is an outcome measure for RA and whether the early changes in hand BMC predict functional disability. METHODS: Tender and swollen joints in hands and body, HAQ score, Larsen score on hand radiographs, serum CRP, and hand BMC measurement by DXA were studied every six months for five years in 40 patients with early RA. At the final visit, patients completed the SF-36 and Duruoz hand function questionnaires. RESULTS: All patients completed two years and 29 completed five years' follow up. Hand BMC worsened over the first three years (percentage loss from baseline: mean (SD) -5.5 (7.2), -7.5 (8.4), -9.8 (9.4)) and stabilised over last two years (-9.9 (8.8), -10 (7.8)). Baseline disease activity and function correlated with hand BMC loss at five years (swollen joints in hands: r=-0.38, p=0.043; swollen joints in body: r=-0.47, p=0.01; HAQ: r=-0.52, p=0.004). Percentage change in hand BMC over five years correlated with SF-36 physical function (r=0.61, p<0.01), hand function (r=-0.64, p<0.01), HAQ score (r=-0.63, p<0.01) at five years. Relative risk of bad hand functional outcome at five years was significantly higher for patients with hand BMC loss of >/=1.17 g (smallest detectable difference) than for patients with less bone loss within the first six months (OR=6.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 34.5, p<0.02). CONCLUSION: Early loss of hand BMC in patients with RA is a composite marker of disease activity and functional status and can predict poor functional outcome.     

Does the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire have potential as a monitoring tool for subjects with rheumatoid arthritis?

OBJECTIVE: To assist in the interpretation of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score changes for individual patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), by determining the minimum size of score change that can confidently be considered to reflect a significant change in disability from the patient's perspective. METHOD: HAQ score changes were calculated for 40 clinic patients with RA who had reported no change to health in general over two months. These were considered to reflect both inconsistencies in questionnaire completion and any true but minor changes not considered significant enough by the patients to represent a change to their health in general. HAQ score changes over one year were also calculated for 207 clinic patients with RA. RESULTS: The range within which 95% of score changes would be expected to lie in the absence of significant change was estimated as +/-0.48 points (+/-2SD of the score changes) and 80% within +/-0.31 points (+/-1.29SD). A chi(2) test showed no significant association between an HAQ score increase of >0.31 over one year and decline in health related to arthritis reported by the patient over the same period. CONCLUSION: As a general guideline, an HAQ score needs to change by 0.48 points or more for 95% confidence that it reflects significant change (0.31 for 80% confidence). Although the value of HAQ as a group outcome measure is well established, this study questions the usefulness of monitoring individual HAQ scores in a clinical setting.     

Hand bone loss in early undifferentiated arthritis: evaluating bone mineral density loss before the development of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES: (1) To examine the change in regional bone mineral density (BMD), including the hands, and assess its role as a predictor of outcome in patients presenting with an early undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis; (2) to examine for associations with the changes in hand BMD. METHODS: 74 patients with undifferentiated hand arthritis of less than 12 months' duration were examined at baseline and then at three, six, and 12 months follow up, including BMD measurement of the femoral neck, spine (L2-4), and the whole hands using dual energy absorptiometry (DXA). RESULTS: During the study, 13 patients were diagnosed as having rheumatoid arthritis, 19 as having inflammatory non-rheumatoid joint disorders, and 42 as having non-inflammatory joint disorders. At the femoral neck and lumbar spine no significant bone loss was seen in any of the three subgroups. At the 12 months follow up the mean (95% confidence interval) hand BMD loss in the patients with rheumatoid arthritis was -4.27% (-1.41 to -7.13); in the inflammatory non-rheumatoid group, -0.49% (-1.33 to +0.35); and in the non-inflammatory joint disorder group, -0.87% (-1.51 to -0.23). In a multivariate linear regression model (including age, rheumatoid factor, mean C reactive protein, mean HAQ score, and cumulative glucocorticoid dose), only mean C reactive protein (p<0.001) and rheumatoid factor (p = 0.04) were independently associated with change in hand BMD during follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Hand DXA provides a very sensitive tool for measuring bone loss in early rheumatoid arthritis and may be useful in identifying patients at high risk of developing progressive disease. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of hand bone loss as a prognostic factor and outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis.     

Prognostic factors for joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective longitudinal study of 318 patients

OBJECTIVE: To quantify articular damage and to investigate prognostic factors for joint damage progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: RA patients satisfying the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria and with disease duration under 5 years were sampled from the EURIDISS longitudinal cohort study in Norway, The Netherlands, and France. Hand radiographs were assessed at baseline and at 2 to 3 year followup using Sharp score modified by van der Heijde. Assessment of erosion and joint space narrowing, performed in sequential order by a single reader blinded to patients' characteristics, had high intraobserver reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.98-0.99). Baseline prognostic factors were analyzed in a multivariate linear regression model. RESULTS: A total of 318 patients with RA aged 52.4 years (70.4% were female) and with a mean 2 years' disease duration at baseline were followed over 30 months. Median (quartiles) baseline and followup modified Sharp scores were 3 (0-11) and 9 (1-27), respectively, with 35.8% and then 22.3% of patients with no radiological damage. Controlling for age, sex, and country, the final joint damage was predicted by baseline modified Sharp score, rheumatoid factor positivity, time from disease diagnosis, patient global health assessment, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and by followup duration, explaining 76.8% of the outcome variance. CONCLUSION: This multinational study confirmed the prognostic role in RA of a set of features previously identified in smaller cohorts. It indicates which disease characteristics should be focused on in the early years of RA to identify patients at higher risk of developing severe disease and who are candidates for aggressive therapy.     

The effects of the diabetes related soft tissue hand lesions and the reduced hand strength on functional disability of hand in type 2 diabetic patients

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to examine the effects of diabetes related soft tissue hand lesions such as Dupuytren's disease, trigger finger and limited joint mobility (LJM) and the reduced hand strength on the functional disability of the hand in type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS: Forty-four type 2 diabetic patients and 60 age and sex matched controls were included in the study. Subjects were examined for the presence of Dupuytren's disease, trigger finger and LJM. Grip strength was tested first with Jamar dynamometer followed by pinch strength measurements using by a manual pinchmeter. Electrophysiological studies were performed in both groups. Duru?z Hand Index (DHI) was used to assess the functional hand disability. RESULTS: The mean DHI score of the diabetics was significantly higher than controls (p<0.0001). Dupuytren's disease, trigger finger or LJM was not correlated with DHI in diabetic patients (p>0.05). The grip and pinch strengths were significantly lower in diabetic patients than the non-diabetic controls (p<0.05) and the grip and pinch strengths were negatively correlated with DHI in type 2 diabetic patients (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Dupuytren's disease, trigger finger and LJM did not cause to functional disability of hand but low hand strength was found to cause functional disability of hand in our type 2 diabetic patients.     

Use of the Sharp and Larsen scoring methods in the assessment of radiographic progression in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the applicability of the Sharp and Larsen scoring methods for radiographic damage in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Wrist/hand radiographs of 25 patients with polyarthritis obtained at first observation and then yearly for 4-5 years were assessed independently by 2 pediatric rheumatologists according to the Sharp and Larsen methods. To facilitate score assignment, each patient radiograph was compared with a bone age-related standard. A third pediatric rheumatologist measured the Poznanski score, and a pediatric radiologist provided a semiquantitative assessment of radiographic damage severity. RESULTS: Interobserver and intraobserver agreement on longitudinal scores were good for both Sharp and Larsen methods, with intraclass correlation coefficient >0.9. Agreement on change assessment was good for the Sharp method and moderate for the Larsen method. Both methods yielded a steady increase in scores during the study, with score change being more marked in the first year. Sharp and Larsen scores were highly correlated (r(s) = 0.96). Correlations of both scores with the Poznanski score were moderate to high (r(s) from -0.62 to -0.72). Radiologist score was correlated at borderline-high level with both Sharp (r(s) = 0.70) and Larsen (r(s) = 0.71) scores. Sharp and Larsen score change from baseline to final visit was moderately to highly correlated with the number of joints with active arthritis and restricted motion and the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire score at final visit. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that the Sharp and Larsen scoring systems are potentially reliable and valid for assessment of radiographic progression in patients with polyarticular JIA.     

Mapping hand functioning in hand osteoarthritis: Comparing self‐report instruments with a comprehensive hand function test

Objective

To determine which self‐report instruments best explain hand functioning measured by a generic comprehensive hand function test.

Methods

Six questionnaires currently used in hand osteoarthritis (OA), namely, the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 Short Form (AIMS2‐SF), the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN), the Cochin scale, the Functional Index of Hand OA (FIHOA), the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and the Score for Assessment and Quantification of Chronic Rheumatoid Affections of the Hands (SACRAH), were administered once in 100 patients with hand OA together with the Jebsen‐Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT). In addition, 3 other hand function tests with short administration time were used: the Moberg Picking‐Up Test (MPUT), the Button Test (BT), and grip strength. The Short Form 36 was used to describe health status. The relationship between the instruments and the JTHFT was determined by correlation analyses.

Results

AIMS2‐SF total scores had the highest raw correlation coefficient to the JTHFT, followed by AIMS2‐SF upper body limitation subscale, SACRAH stiffness subscale, and SACRAH total score. If controlled for age, the HAQ had the highest correlation coefficient. Of the 3 short hand function tests, the MPUT showed the highest raw correlation coefficient to the JTHFT; if controlled for age, the BT had the highest correlation coefficient.

Conclusion

To comprehensively assess hand functioning in patients with hand OA, we recommend using both a self‐report instrument used more generally in various arthritides and a self‐report instrument specifically developed for hand OA. If a short test is preferred, we recommend using the MPUT or BT.