Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: A comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography

We compared quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with respect to their ability to discriminate subjects with and without prevalent vertebral fractures. In 240 post-menopausal women (mean age 63.7±6.9 years) lateral spine radiographs (T4-L4) were reviewed for the presence of vertebral fracture. Using a semiquantitative technique to grade the severity of vertebral deformities, we classified fractures as mild, moderate or severe (grade 1 to 3, respectively). Postero-anterior DXA (PA-DXA) and lateral DXA (L-DXA) measurements (L2–4) as well as QCT measurements of the lumbar spine (T12-L3 or L1–14) were obtained in all women. Seventy-two women were diagnosed with at least one fracture, and of these 40 were graded as mild. Comparing normal women with fractured women, we found the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves to be greatest for QCT (0.81), followed by L-DXA (0.72) and PA-DXA (0.65). The differences among all three techniques were significant. Comparing the normal women with women having only mild fractures, the areas under the ROC curves were 0.79, 0.73 and 0.63 for QCT, L-DXA and PA-DXA, respectively. Significant differences existed between QCT and PA-DXA as well as between L-DXA and PA-DXA. Logistic regression analysis also revealed the highest age-adjusted odds ratios for QCT (3.67; 2.25–5.97) while L-DXA and PA-DXA showed substantially lower odds ratios (2.00; 1.39–2.87, and 1.54; 1.11–2.15, respectively). We conclude that low bone density as measured by QCT, PA-DXA or L-DXA is significantly associated with the prevalence of vertebral fractures. Of the methods studied, QCT of trabecular bone offered the best discriminatory capability. L-DXA proved to be superior to PA-DXA in its diagnostic sensitivity, particularly in women with mild fracture. Mild vertebral fractures are associated with decreased spinal bone density and may be regarded as osteoporotic deformities.     

Normal Changes in Spinal Bone Mineral Density in a Chinese Population: Assessment by Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry

This study was designed to determine age- and gender-based normative values for spinal bone mineral density (BMD) in a Chinese population. In addition, we compared our data with those of other countries and populations. Four hundred and forty-three healthy Chinese subjects, aged 10–79 years (189 males, mean age 46.9 years; 254 females, mean age 45.7 years) were recruited for BMD assessment. BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), including postero-anterior DXA (PA-DXA), lateral DXA (L-DXA) and midlateral DXA (mL-DXA). For both genders, BMD values peaked in the 10–19 year age group when measured by QCT, and in the 30–39 year age group when measured by PA-DXA. BMD values decreased with age after reaching peak bone density in males and females for all measurements, except for PA-DXA in males. Male BMD values by DXA tended to increase beginning with the 60–69 age group through the 70–79 age group whether by PA-DXA, or L-DXA and mL-DXA. However, male QCT data showed stable BMD values among these two older groups. Comparative results showed female QCT data were higher in the 20–39 age group and lower after the 40–49 age group compared with American females. The peak BMD value by PA-DXA in Chinese females was reached in the same age group as American and European females and was similar in magnitude (p > 0.05). However, the peak BMD value for Chinese females was reached earlier and was significantly higher than that observed in Japanese females (p < 0.001). We conclude that the age group in which the peak BMD values are reached is different depending on the technique used, as is the calculated age-related rate of bone loss. It can be speculated that such differences reflect different timing for bone maturation in cancellous and cortical bone. Received: 21 February 1998 / Accepted: 28 May 1998     

A comparison of spinal quantitative computed tomography with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in European women with vertebral and nonvertebral fractures

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) was compared to dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured in the lumbar spine of 508 European women defined as normal without fracture (NoF), or osteoporotic (OP), with either vertebral fracture (VF), or peripheral fracture (PF). The correlations between QCT and DXA BMD measurements were significantly different in normal and in osteoporotic patients, indicating that the two exams do not measure the same bone aspects. According to ROC curves results, QCT Z-scores separate OP from NoF with better sensitivity than all other measurements. A threshold to differentiate OP from NoF was chosen at Z-score=−1 for DXA-BMD and −1.5 for QCT-BMD. VF patients showed a highly significant decrease in BMD by DXA or QCT. PF patients revealed measurements lower than those of normal subjects but greater than those of VF, calling into question the idea of a diffuse osteoporosis causing nonvertebral fractures that is measurable by spinal DXA or QCT. DXA is weakly dependent upon age, and T-score or Z-score are equivalent for evaluating osteoporosis. QCT depends greatly upon age, and Z-score appears to be more efficient.     

Converted Lumbar BMD Values Derived from Sagittal Reformations of Contrast-Enhanced MDCT Predict Incidental Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

We obtained baseline and follow-up bone mineral density (BMD) values of the lumbar spine from sagittal reformations of routine abdominal contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) using a reference phantom and assessed their performance in differentiating patients with no, existing, and incidental osteoporotic fractures of the spine. A MDCT-to-QCT (quantitative computed tomography) conversion equation for lumbar BMD measurements was developed by using 15 postmenopausal women (63 ± 12 years), who underwent standard lumbar QCT (L1-L3) and afterward routine abdominal contrast-enhanced MDCT. Sagittal reformations were used for corresponding lumbar BMD measurements. The MDCT-to-QCT conversion equation was applied to baseline and follow-up routine abdominal contrast-enhanced MDCT scans of 149 postmenopausal women (63 ± 10 years). Their vertebral fracture status (no, existing, or incidental osteoporotic fracture) was assessed in the sagittal reformations. A correlation coefficient of r = 0.914 (p < 0.001) was calculated for the BMD values of MDCT and standard QCT with the conversion equation BMD(QCT) = 0.695 × BMD(MDCT) - 7.9 mg/mL. Mean follow-up time of the 149 patients was 20 ± 12 months. Fifteen patients (10.1 %) had an existing osteoporotic vertebral fracture at baseline. Incidental osteoporotic vertebral fractures were diagnosed in 13 patients (8.7 %). Patients with existing and incidental fractures showed significantly (p < 0.05) lower converted BMD values (averaged over L1-L3) than patients without fracture at baseline and at follow-up. In this longitudinal study, BMD values of the lumbar spine derived from sagittal reformations of routine abdominal contrast-enhanced MDCT predicted incidental osteoporotic vertebral fractures.     

Imaging Technologies for Assessment of Skeletal Health in Men

Conventional radiography can detect most fractures, evaluate their healing, and visualize characteristic skeletal abnormalities for some metabolic bone diseases. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used to measure areal bone mineral density (BMD) in order to diagnose osteoporosis, estimate fracture risk, and monitor changes in BMD over time. Vertebral fracture assessment by DXA can diagnose vertebral fractures with less ionizing radiation, greater patient convenience, and lower cost than conventional radiography. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measures volumetric BMD separately in cortical and trabecular bone compartments. High resolution peripheral QCT and high resolution magnetic resonance imaging are noninvasive research tools that assess the microarchitecture of bone. The use of these technologies and others has been associated with special challenges in men compared with women, provided insights into differences in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis in men and women, and enhanced understanding of the mechanisms of action of osteoporosis treatments.     

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH): relation to vertebral fractures and bone density

Summary

Radiographs and spinal bone mineral density (BMD) were evaluated from 342 elderly men regarding possible effects of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) on vertebral fractures and densitometry measurements. Prevalent vertebral fractures were more frequent among men with DISH compared to men with no DISH even after fracture prevalence was adjusted for BMD. Paravertebral calcifications should be considered in patients with DISH when interpreting BMD measurements because both dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative CT (QCT) densitometry may not be reliable.

Introduction

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of DISH in older men and its association with vertebral fractures and with BMD determined by DXA and QCT.

Methods

Lateral radiographs of the spine were analyzed in a sample of 342 men aged ??65?years participating in the MrOS Study concerning the presence and grade of DISH and vertebral fractures. Lumbar BMD was measured by both DXA (areal, grams per square centimeter) and QCT (volumetric, grams per cubic centimeter). The association between DISH, BMD, and presence of fractures was studied using ?? ² and t tests.

Results

DISH was present in 52% (178/342) of the men. Men with DISH were older (mean, 75.1 vs 73.3, p?<?0.05) and more likely to have prevalent fractures (28% vs 20%, p?<?p?=?0.09). BMD assessed with DXA (1.08 vs 1.00?g/cm², p????0.0001), but not with QCT (0.11 vs 0.11?g/cm3, p?=?0.65), was significantly higher in men with DISH compared to men without DISH. Significantly lower BMD of men with both DISH and fractures compared to men with DISH but without fractures was only detected by QCT (?25%, 0.09 vs 0.12, p?<?0.05). Both DXA BMD and QCT BMD were significantly higher in severe lumbar DISH (+22% and +31%, p?<?0.0001), respectively.

Conclusion

DISH was associated with a higher prevalence of vertebral fractures in elderly men. Lumbar ossifications related to DISH should be considered when interpreting BMD measurements to predict their fracture risk.     

Measurement of bone mineral density at the spine and proximal femur by volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in elderly women with and without vertebral fractures.

The goal of this study was to determine the effect of vertebral fracture status on trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) measurements obtained in the proximal femur and spine by helical volumetric quantitative computed tomography (vQCT). The study population consisted of 71 Italian women (average age 73 +/- 6) years. This group included 26 subjects with radiographically confirmed atraumatic vertebral fractures and 45 controls. The subjects received helical CT scans of the L1 and L2 vertebral bodies and the hip. The three-dimensional CT images were processed using specialized image analysis algorithms to extract measurements of trabecular, cortical, and integral BMD in the spine and hip. To compare the vQCT results with the most widely used clinical BMD measurement, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the anteroposterior (AP) spine and proximal femur were also obtained. The difference between the subjects with vertebral fractures and the age-matched controls was computed for each BMD measure. All BMD measurements showed statistically significant differences, which ranged from 7% to 22% between subjects with fractures and controls. Although, given our small sample size, we could not detect statistically significant differences in discriminatory power between BMD techniques, integral BMD of the spine measured by vQCT and DXA tended to show stronger associations with fracture status (0.001 < p < 0.004). Measurements by QCT and DXA at the hip were also associated with vertebral fracture status, although the association of DXA BMD with fracture status was explained largely by differences in body weight between subjects with vertebral fractures and controls.     

DXA、QCT和SPA方法测量47例绝经后妇女骨质疏松症的比较

以骨密度测量应用最广的３种方法（ＤＸＡ─双能ｘ线吸收法，ＱＣＴ─定量ＣＴ法和ＳＰＡ─单光子吸收法）测量绝经后妇女的骨矿密度，比较其测量值、诊断结果和相关关系。首先用ＳＰＡ法测量绝经后妇女１８１例，诊断骨质疏松（ＯＰ）４７例。三种方法测量骨矿密度的均值分别低于峰值骨量的Ｍ─２ｓ的９％、２１．４％和２１％，且ＤＸＡ和ＱＣＴ两种方法测量的均值都在骨折阈值范围内。ＤＸＡ和ＱＣＴ诊断４７例ＯＰ之间无显著性差异，当排除椎骨骨质增生后的ｘ２＝０．２３７，且ＤＸＡ和ＱＣＴ测量值之间为正相关，ｒ＝０．７９９，而ＤＸＡ、ＱＣＴ和ＳＰＡ之间的相关系数，ｒ＝０．１８５和０．２８５，ＤＸＡ诊断ＯＰ的敏感性为８６．６％，特异性为７０％。     

What is the future of patient-specific vertebral fracture prediction?

This paper aims to introduce a few alternative methodologies for prediction of vertebral fractures, the most common type being fragility fracture in the elderly. Current methods, such as DXA, for diagnosing osteoporosis and predicting the risk of vertebral failure, are often not accurate thereby preventing those patients at risk from receiving adequate treatment. Robust fracture prediction models for vertebral fracture risk should not only include BMD, as measured by DXA, but should incorporate a wide range of factors including bone geometry, bone mineral distribution within the vertebral body, daily living activities, and spine musculature. One promising technique is finite element modeling, which has been developed over the past several decades and implements clinical imaging, such as quantitative computed tomography (QCT), and engineering fundamentals to more accurately predict the risk of fracture. Other imaging tools that assess bone mineral distribution and structure at the microscopic level include micro-CT or high-resolution peripheral QCT (HR-pQCT). These newer techniques hold the promise of more accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis and those at risk for vertebral insufficiency fractures before they occur.     

Prediction of clinical non-spine fractures in older black and white men and women with volumetric BMD of the spine and areal BMD of the hip: the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study*.

In a prospective study of 1446 black and white adults 70-79 yr of age (average follow-up, 6.4 yr), vertebral TrvBMD from QCT predicted non-spine fracture in black and white women and black men, but it was not a stronger predictor than total hip aBMD from DXA. Hip aBMD predicted non-spine fracture in black men. INTRODUCTION: Areal BMD (aBMD) at multiple skeletal sites predicts clinical non-spine fractures in white and black women and white men. The predictive ability of vertebral trabecular volumetric BMD (TrvBMD) for all types of clinical non-spine fractures has never been tested or compared with hip aBMD. Also, the predictive accuracy of hip aBMD has never been tested prospectively for black men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured vertebral TrvBMD with QCT and hip aBMD with DXA in 1446 elderly black and white adults (70-79 yr) in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. One hundred fifty-two clinical non-spine fractures were confirmed during an average of 6.4 yr of >95% complete follow-up. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to determine the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs of non-spine fracture per SD reduction in hip aBMD and vertebral TrvBMD. RESULTS: Vertebral TrvBMD and hip aBMD were both associated with risk of non-spine fracture in black and white women and black men. The age-adjusted HR of fracture per SD decrease in BMD was highest in black men (hip aBMD: HR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.03, 4.04; vertebral TrvBMD: HR = 3.00, 95% CI = 1.29, 7.00) and lowest in white men (hip aBMD: HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.85, 1.78; vertebral TrvBMD: HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.73, 1.54). Adjusted for age, sex, and race, each SD decrease in hip aBMD was associated with a 1.67-fold (95% CI = 1.36, 2.07) greater risk of fracture, and each SD decrease in vertebral TrvBMD was associated with a 1.47-fold (95% CI = 1.18, 1.82) greater risk. Combining measurements of hip aBMD and vertebral TrvBMD did not improve fracture prediction. CONCLUSIONS: Low BMD measured by either spine QCT or hip DXA predicts non-spine fracture in older black and white women and black men. Vertebral TrvBMD is not a stronger predictor than hip aBMD of non-spine fracture.     

Image-Based Assessment of Spinal Trabecular Bone Structure from High-Resolution CT Images

The goal of this study was to assess whether a high-resolution CT measure of trabecular bone structure can enhance the discrimination between subjects with or without a vertebral fracture and having overall low hip or spine bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Sixty-one women with low BMD by DXA (T-score <–2.5 at hip or spine) were examined. Twenty women had sustained a vertebral fracture. Quantitative CT (QCT) BMD and high-resolution CT spinal scans were performed on a whole-body CT scanner. For the high-resolution images (0.31 mm pixel, 1.5 mm thick slice), trabecular bone was segmented from marrow using an adaptive threshold, region growth and skeletonization step. From the processed image we measured the apparent trabecular bone fraction (BV/TV), apparent trabecular thickness (I.Th) and apparent trabecular spacing (I.Sp). We also assessed the connectivity of the marrow space using region growing to derive a mean (H_A) and maximum (H_M) hole size. Despite the fact that the study population was preselected to have a low BMD by DXA, QCT BMD was highly associated with (p <0.005) with fracture status. All structural parameters were correlated (r ~ 0.64 to 0.79) with BMD with p <0.003 and showed significant differences between the fracture and non-fracture group. However, except for H_A, this difference did not remain significant after adjustment for BMD. When BMD and then H_A was entered into a paired linear regression model to predict fracture outcome, H_A contributed with p= 0.03 and BMD with p= 0.86. ROC analysis was applied and showed that H_A, BMD, I.Th and I.Sp discriminated the two groups with areas of 0.76, 0.75, 0.71 and 0.68, respectively. These findings suggest that an assessment of vertebral trabecular structure from high-resolution CT images is useful in discriminating subjects with vertebral fractures and potentially useful for predicting future fractures. Received: 10 October 1997 / Accepted: 4 December 1997     

Mild versus definite osteoporosis: comparison of bone densitometry techniques using different statistical models

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the ability of three bone densitometry techniques to discriminate subjects with mild vertebral deformities from those with definite compression fractures. We determined bone mineral density (BMD) in 68 postmenopausal women by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) of the spine, as well as single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) of the radius. Forty four individuals were classified as having mild deformities of the spine and 24 were considered to have definite vertebral compressions. Several statistical approaches were used to compare these subgroups and to estimate the relative risk of vertebral fracture. Included among these were percent decrements and zeta-scores, ROC curves, odds ratio estimations, and logistic regression analysis. Individuals with definite vertebral fractures had lower bone mineral density at all sites, but measurement of radial compact bone by SPA failed to reach significance. Using ROC analysis to distinguish mild deformities from true compressions, we found that measurement of spinal trabecular bone by QCT to be the most sensitive discriminator; although measurement of spinal integral bone by DPA also gave satisfactory discrimination, whereas assessment of radial compact bone did not adequately differentiate patients with mild deformities from those with definite compressions. Likewise, we found determination of spinal trabecular bone to be the most robust predictor of relative risk of definite fracture using either odds ratios or logistic regression analysis. Measurement of BMD in the peripheral cortical skeleton offered no predictive power for true vertebral fracture. We concluded that direct assessment of the spine, particularly of the trabecular portion, offered the strongest discrimination and relative risk prediction for definite osteoporotic fractures compared with milder forms of this condition.     

Vertebral body index and bone mineral density in women with spinal fractures: 66 probands compared with controls

The bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in 61 women with compression fractures of the spine and 66 normal pre-menopausal women. Radiographs of the lateral spine were also obtained and the vertebral body index (VBI) was measured in the region L2-L4. Women with spinal fractures had lower BMD and VBI values. Using both BMD and VBI, 3 regions of fracture risk were defined. All but 2 of the fracture patients were in the moderate- or high-risk region for fracture.     

Disc space narrowing is associated with an increased vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women: the OFELY Study.

We have analyzed the relationship between spine osteoarthritis and fractures in the OFELY cohort. Despite a higher BMD associated with spine OA, the risk of fragility fractures is not reduced. Disc space narrowing is associated with an increased risk of vertebral fracture. These data indicate that the risk of osteoporotic fracture should not be underestimated in women with spine OA. INTRODUCTION: Although osteoarthritis (OA) and osteoporosis both increase with age, their co-existence is uncommon. A higher BMD in OA is well documented, but a reduction of the fracture risk is still controversial. Our objective was to analyze the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women with spine OA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, spine OA was evaluated by lateral radiographs according to the method of Lane, and BMD was measured by DXA in 559 postmenopausal women from the OFELY cohort (mean age, 68 +/- 8 years; range, 58-94 years) 8 years after their inclusion into the study. Previous fragility fractures, all confirmed by radiographs, were prospectively registered during the annual follow-up for 8 years, and vertebral fractures were evaluated with spine radiographs. Severity of OA was assessed by scoring on osteophytes and disc narrowing on a four-point scale from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe) and graded as 0 (normal), 1 (mild osteophyte and/or narrowing), or 2 (moderate or severe osteophyte and/or narrowing). RESULTS: Osteophytes and disc narrowing were present in 75% and 64%, respectively, of women at the lumbar spine and in 88% and 51%, respectively, at the thoracic spine, increasing with age. BMD of the spine, hip, and whole body increased with the severity of osteophytosis, whereas severity of narrowing was associated with a higher BMD only at the spine. Ninety-six fractures, including 48 vertebral fractures, occurred before OA assessment. No significant association was found between spine OA and all fragility fractures. In contrast, disc narrowing was associated with an increased risk of vertebral fracture with an odds ratio (95% CI) of 3.2 (1.1-9.3) after adjusting for age, body mass index, and BMD. The risk of vertebral fracture increased with the severity of disc narrowing. In comparison with the score 0, the odds ratio increased from 2.8 (0.9-8.7) to 4.6 (1.2-16.9) in women with mild to severe disc narrowing score. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher BMD, women with spine OA do not have a reduced risk of fracture. Disc narrowing is associated with a significant increased vertebral fracture risk.     

Impact of Spinal Degenerative Changes on the Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density with Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate degenerative factors in a postmenopausal patient group and differentiate the influence on bone mineral density (BMD) measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The patients and methods included an investigation of 144 postmenopausal women (mean 63.3 years) with PA-DXA of the spine. Degenerative factors (osteophytes, osteochondrosis, scoliosis, and vascular calcification) were evaluated from plain lumbar radiographs, their estimated probability was analyzed as a function of age, and their influence on BMD measured by PA-DXA was determined. The results of the study revealed osteophytes in 45.8%, vascular calcifications in 24.3%, scoliosis in 22.2%, osteochondrosis in 21.5%. The estimated probability for degenerative factors increased from 35 to 80% in the 55- to 70- year age group. Osteophytes and osteochondrosis were associated with up to a 14% increase in BMD values (P < 0.001). Vascular calcifications showed a positive trend, whereas scoliosis did not show a discernible influence. We concluded that degenerative factors, except for scoliosis, showed an influence on BMD as measured by DXA. Their prevalence increased rapidly between 55 and 70 years of age. Interpretation of PA-DXA spine data for subjects of or above this age range should be complemented by plain film radiographs. Received: 30 May 1996 / Accepted: 24 July 1996     

Bone marrow fat composition as a novel imaging biomarker in postmenopausal women with prevalent fragility fractures

The goal of this magnetic resonance (MR) imaging study was to quantify vertebral bone marrow fat content and composition in diabetic and nondiabetic postmenopausal women with fragility fractures and to compare them with nonfracture controls with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sixty‐nine postmenopausal women (mean age 63 ± 5 years) were recruited. Thirty‐six patients (47.8%) had spinal and/or peripheral fragility fractures. Seventeen fracture patients were diabetic. Thirty‐three women (52.2%) were nonfracture controls. Sixteen women were diabetic nonfracture controls. To quantify vertebral bone marrow fat content and composition, patients underwent MR spectroscopy (MRS) of the lumbar spine at 3 Tesla. Bone mineral density (BMD) was determined by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the hip and lumbar spine (LS) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the LS. To evaluate associations of vertebral marrow fat content and composition with spinal and/or peripheral fragility fractures and diabetes, we used linear regression models adjusted for age, race, and spine volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) by QCT. At the LS, nondiabetic and diabetic fracture patients had lower vBMD than controls and diabetics without fractures (p = 0.018; p = 0.005). However, areal bone mineral density (aBMD) by DXA did not differ between fracture and nonfracture patients. After adjustment for age, race, and spinal vBMD, the prevalence of fragility fractures was associated with ?1.7% lower unsaturation levels (confidence interval [CI] ?2.8% to ?0.5%, p = 0.005) and +2.9% higher saturation levels (CI 0.5% to 5.3%, p = 0.017). Diabetes was associated with ?1.3% (CI –2.3% to ?0.2%, p = 0.018) lower unsaturation and +3.3% (CI 1.1% to 5.4%, p = 0.004) higher saturation levels. Diabetics with fractures had the lowest marrow unsaturation and highest saturation. There were no associations of marrow fat content with diabetes or fracture. Our results suggest that altered bone marrow fat composition is linked with fragility fractures and diabetes. MRS of spinal bone marrow fat may therefore serve as a novel tool for BMD‐independent fracture risk assessment.     

Spinal and Femoral DXA for the Assessment of Spinal Osteoporosis

The objective was to determine the diagnostic sensitivity of spinal and femoral dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to study whether a combination of both sites may enhance discriminatory capability in regard to the presence of vertebral fractures. Spinal and femoral DXA were obtained in 324 postmenopausal women, of whom 90 had at least one vertebral fracture. Age-adjusted logistic regression analyses, ROC analyses, and sensitivity-specificity statistics were used to assess the discriminatory ability of spinal and femoral bone density (BMD) alone and in combination. The age-adjusted odds ratios per standard deviation decrease in BMD (OR) for spinal and femoral measurements were comparable (Ward's triangle: OR = 1.62; femoral neck: OR = 1.51; total hip: OR = 1.47; spine: OR = 1.34). Combining spinal and femoral bone density measurements did not improve diagnostic sensitivity of DXA considerably as compared to using BMD of a single site and adjusting the ``fracture threshold.' The conclusion drawn is that spinal and femoral BMD measurements using DXA have a comparable diagnostic sensitivity for vertebral fracture discrimination. Different individuals at risk for osteoporosis may be identified using both methods. The clinical usefulness of a combination of two bone density measurements needs further study in a prospective setting. Received: 7 January 1997 / Accepted: 5 June 1997     

High resolution quantitative computed tomography-based assessment of trabecular microstructure and strength estimates by finite-element analysis of the spine,but not DXA,reflects vertebral fracture status in men with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

High-resolution quantitative computed tomography (HRQCT)-based analysis of spinal bone density and microstructure, finite element analysis (FEA), and DXA were used to investigate the vertebral bone status of men with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO). DXA of L1–L3 and total hip, QCT of L1–L3, and HRQCT of T12 were available for 73 men (54.6 ± 14.0 years) with GIO. Prevalent vertebral fracture status was evaluated on radiographs using a semi-quantitative (SQ) score (normal = 0 to severe fracture = 3), and the spinal deformity index (SDI) score (sum of SQ scores of T4 to L4 vertebrae). Thirty-one (42.4%) subjects had prevalent vertebral fractures. Cortical BMD (Ct.BMD) and thickness (Ct.Th), trabecular BMD (Tb.BMD), apparent trabecular bone volume fraction (app.BV/TV), and apparent trabecular separation (app.Tb.Sp) were analyzed by HRQCT. Stiffness and strength of T12 were computed by HRQCT-based nonlinear FEA for axial compression, anterior bending and axial torsion. In logistic regressions adjusted for age, glucocorticoid dose and osteoporosis treatment, Tb.BMD was most closely associated with vertebral fracture status (standardized odds ratio [sOR]: Tb.BMD T12: 4.05 [95% CI: 1.8–9.0], Tb.BMD L1–L3: 3.95 [1.8–8.9]). Strength divided by cross-sectional area for axial compression showed the most significant association with spine fracture status among FEA variables (2.56 [1.29–5.07]). SDI was best predicted by a microstructural model using Ct.Th and app.Tb.Sp (r² = 0.57, p < 0.001). Spinal or hip DXA measurements did not show significant associations with fracture status or severity.In this cross-sectional study of males with GIO, QCT, HRQCT-based measurements and FEA variables were superior to DXA in discriminating between patients of differing prevalent vertebral fracture status. A microstructural model combining aspects of cortical and trabecular bone reflected fracture severity most accurately.     

Bone Density Reduction in Various Measurement Sites in Men and Women with Osteoporotic Fractures of Spine and Hip: The European Quantitation of Osteoporosis Study

We have measured bone mineral density (BMD) using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the spine and hip, spinal quantitative computed tomography (QCTspi), and peripheral radial quantitative computed tomography (pQCTrad) in 334 spine and 51 hip fracture patients. The standardized hip and spine BMD for each patient was calculated and compared with the combined reference ranges published previously, each densitometer having been cross-calibrated with the prototype European Spine Phantom (ESPp) or the European Forearm Phantom (EFP). Male and female fracture cases had similar BMD values after adjusting for body size, where appropriate. This suggests that the relationship between bone density (mass per unit volume) and fracture risk is similar between men and women. However, compared with age-matched controls, mean decreases in BMD ranged from 0.78 SD units (women with hip fracture, DXAspi) to 2.57 SD units (men with spine fractures, QCTspi). The proportion of spine and hip fracture patients falling below the cutoff for osteoporosis (T-score <−2.5 SD) proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) study group varied according to different BMD measurement procedures (range 18–94%). This finding suggests that the WHO definition requires different thresholds when used with non-DXA BMD measurement techniques. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare measurement techniques for their ability to discriminate between cases and controls. Among DXA sites, the proximal femur was preferred when evaluating generalized bone loss, particularly in elderly people. An additional spinal BMD measurement may add clinical value if spine fracture risk assessment has a high priority. Both axial and peripheral QCT techniques performed comparably to DXA in spinal osteoporosis, so investigators and clinicians may use any of the three technologies with similar degrees of confidence for the diagnosis of generalized or site-specific bone loss providing straightforward clinical guidelines are followed. Received: 21 May 1997 / Accepted: 24 June 1998     

Quantitative Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Spinal Osteoporosis Following Spinal Cord Injury

Disuse osteoporosis occurs in the lower extremities of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, spinal osteoporosis is not usually observed in these patients. We investigated lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in SCI patients using single energy quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Our study population consisted of 64 patients with long-standing SCI. Spine BMD (g/cm³) was assessed by QCT at four vertebrae ranging from T11 to L4 with single midvertebral CT slices 1 cm thick parallel to the vertebral end-plates. Confounding variables affecting normal trabecular bone pattern, such as compression fractures, surgical hardware or fat replacement, were excluded. For a subset of 29 patients, DXA values of the spine and femoral neck were also measured, and QCT and DXA Z-scores were compared On the average, the 64 SCI patients had Z-scores 2.0 ± 1.2 below those of age-matched controls. In the subset of 29 patients with both QCT and DXA measurements, the QCT and DXA Z-scores were 2.4 ± 1.1 below and 1.3 ± 2.3 above the mean, respectively (p<0.0001). Our results indicate that QCT reveals osteoporosis of the spine after SCI, in contrast to DXA. We postulate that QCT is more valuable for evaluating spinal osteoporosis following SCI than DXA and thus recommend QCT for spinal BMD studies in SCI. Received: 20 December 1999 / Accepted: 17 April 2000