A phase II study of interleukin-2 with and without beta-interferon in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma

Background Biologic response modifiers have activity in renal cell carcinoma. The combination of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and beta-interferon (B-IFN) is synergisticin vitro. This trial was initiated to determine the efficacy of IL-2 alone and with B-IFN in advanced RCC.Methods Ambulatory patients with advanced RCC were randomly allocated to either IL-2 6×10⁶ units/ M² intravenously (IV) three days a week for four weeks or IL-2 5×106 units/M² IV plus B-IFN 6×10⁶ units/ M² IV three days a week for 4 weeks. This induction phase was followed by a maintenance phase of the same drugs and doses administered for two weeks out of every four.Results 84 patients were entered onto this phase II trial with 75 considered eligible for response and survival. Toxicity is reported for the 81 patients on whom data was received, irrespective of eligibility. The overall response rate (RR) was 9.3% (7/75). Of the 3 responses in the IL-2 arm (RR=8.3%), one was a complete response. 4 patients in the IL-2 + B-IFN arm (RR=10.3%) achieved a partial response. Median survival was estimated to be 8.4 months for patients given IL-2 and 8.0 months for patients given the IL-2 and B-IFN combination. Multivariate analysis of survival data identified initial performance status, metastases of >1 site, and weight loss as being important prognostic factors for survival. There were 2 lethal and 3 life threatening toxicities with the IL-2 treatment. While there were no lethal toxicities on the combination arm, there were 4 life threatening toxicities.Conclusions The results of this study indicate that further investigation of IL-2 with or without B-IFN at this dose and schedule as treatments for renal cell carcinoma is probably not warranted.Deceased; formerly at Lanenkau Hospital Cancer Treatment Center, Wynnewood, PA.     

Phase II study of S-1 monotherapy as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: the Central Japan Lung Study Group trial 0404

Although S-1 has been shown to have activity against advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its efficacy for elderly patients remains unclear. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1 as a first-line treatment for elderly patients. Chemotherapy-na?ve patients aged 70 years or older with stages IIIB to IV or postoperative NSCLC and performance status 1 or lower were eligible. Patients received S-1 approximately equivalent to 80 mg/m/day for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the response rate. Secondary end points were toxicity, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Twenty-nine patients were eligible. The median age was 78 years (range, 70-85 years). The overall response rate and the disease control rate were 27.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.3-43.9%] and 65.5% (95% CI: 48.2-82.8%), respectively. The median progression-free survival time was 4.0 months (95% CI: 4.0-9.8 months). The median overall survival was 12.1 months (95% CI: 13.8-25.5 months) and the 1-year survival rate was 53.6%. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. The only hematological toxicity of grade 3 was anemia in 6.9% of patients. The grade 3 nonhematological toxicities included hyponatremia, anorexia, nausea, oral mucositis, and diarrhea in 3.4% of patients and infection in 6.9% of patients. S-1 monotherapy was effective and well tolerated as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. The results of this study warrant further investigations of this regimen, including a randomized controlled trial.     

Paclitaxel and cetuximab combination efficiency after the failure of a platinum-based chemotherapy in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

The addition of cetuximab (CTX) to the combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil increases the overall survival (OS) in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Only a few patients are eligible for this treatment because of its toxicity. The combination of CTX and paclitaxel (TXL) could be included in sequential treatment strategies. Patients were treated with CTX (400/250 mg/m) and TXL (60-80 mg/m) weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy and safety outcomes were determined retrospectively. A total of 42 patients were included in this analysis. The overall response rate was 38% [95% confidence interval (CI); 23-53%]. The disease control rate with TXL and CTX combination was 74%. Seven (17%) patients progressed before the first evaluation. The median progression-free survival was 3.9 months [95% CI; 3.1-4.7 months] and the median OS was 7.6 months [95% CI; 5.3-9.9 months]. Neurotoxicity and skin rash were the most frequent grade≥2 toxicities, reported in 17 and 12% of patients, respectively. Previous chemotherapy seems to be associated with a lower response rate and progression-free survival but not with the OS. The combination of CTX and TXL was an active and well-tolerated treatment in this series of patients with a poor prognosis and who were mostly symptomatic.     

Phase II study of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

We conducted a phase II study to examine the efficacy and safety of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Forty chemotherapy-naive patients (10 with stage IIIB and 30 with stage IV NSCLC) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and adequate organ functions were enrolled. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (80 mg/m2) on day 1, and docetaxel (35 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15, delivered in 4-week cycles consisting of three weekly treatments followed by 1 week of rest. There were 18 partial responses, with an overall response rate of 45% (95% confidence interval 29.6-60.4%) in 40 treated patients. The median survival period was 19.9 months, median progression-free survival was 5.5 months and 1-year survival rate was 69.4%. Hematologic toxicities were mild and included grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 37.5%. There were no severe infections or septic deaths. Non-hematologic toxicities were generally mild. Grade 3 or 4 transaminase elevations were observed in two patients. Grade 3 events included two cases each of vomiting, and one case each of hypokalemia, diarrhea and creatinine elevations. Weekly docetaxel and cisplatin is an effective and safe combination in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.     

A phase II trial of modified FOLFOX as first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer

The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of leucovorin plus 5-fluorouracil combined with oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX regimen) every 2 weeks on previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer patients in the Chinese population. Fifty-one inpatients were enrolled to receive 85 mg/m oxaliplatin intravenously over a 2- h period on day 1, together with 400 mg/m2 leucovorin over 2- h, followed by a 46-h infusion of 5-fluorouracil at 2600 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. Treatment was given until progression or unmanageable toxicity ensued. In all, 51 patients received three or more oxaliplatin doses and a median of nine treatment cycles (range 3-16 cycles). Of the 51 eligible patients, two complete responses and 22 partial responses were observed for an overall response rate of 47.0% (95% confidence interval 35-64%). Median progression-free survival was 7.7 months (95% confidence interval 6.8-8.6) and median overall survival was 15.0 months (95% confidence interval 13.1-16.9). Toxicities were mild: five patients (9.8%) reported grade 3-4 neutropenia, 33 patients (64.8%) experienced grade 1-3 neurotoxicity and only six patients (11.8%) experienced grade 3 neurotoxicity. The leucovorin plus 5-fluorouracil combined with oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX) regimen is active and well tolerated in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer in the Chinese population.     

Feasibility of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma and a performance status of 2

The use of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin is well documented in selected patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC), but little is known on the feasibility of systemic treatments in patients with a performance status (PS) of 2. We retrospectively examined the medical records of consecutive BTC patients with a PS of 2 receiving gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) plus oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks from January 2003 to December 2011 in our institution. Body composition was analysed by computed tomography scan to detect sarcopenia. The primary evaluation criterion was safety. The secondary evaluation criteria were the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Twenty-eight patients (median age: 63 years, range 41-83) received a total of 175 cycles (median per patient: 6, range 2-12). Ten patients (35.7%) had sarcopenia on the pretreatment computed tomography scan. The most frequent toxicities were thrombocytopenia (grades 2-4: n=4, 14.3%), peripheral neuropathy (grades 2-3: n=9, 32.1%) and cholangitis (n=4, 14.3%). The best response was a partial response in 10.7% of patients [95% confidence interval (CI): 0-22.2] and stable disease in 42.9% of patients. The median PFS and OS were 4.6 (95% CI: 2.5-6.3) and 7.5 (95% CI: 5.2-9.5) months, respectively. The median PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients without sarcopenia: 7.0 months (95% CI: 4.4-8.0) vs. 2.2 months (95% CI: 2.0-2.5), P less than 0.01, and 10.4 months (95% CI: 7.5-11.6) vs. 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.7-5.2), P less than 0.01, respectively. In our experience, gemcitabine-oxaliplatin was feasible and induced effective palliation in PS2 patients with advanced BTC. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.     

Capecitabine as third-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after failing immunotherapy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of capecitabine as third-line treatment in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma for whom immunotherapy had failed. Twenty-one patients with metastatic clear renal cell carcinoma were enrolled. Capecitabine was administered orally twice daily at a dosage of 2500 mg/m(2) for 14 days, followed by 7 days of rest. The median number of administered cycles was five (1-13). One patient (4.8%) achieved a remission after eight treatment cycles. Stable disease was observed in nine patients (42.8%), whereas 11 progressed (52.4%). The estimated median time to progression was 3.6 months (confidence interval: 1.4 to 5.2). The estimated median overall survival was 7.2 months (confidence interval: 4.6 to 8.8). The regimen was well tolerated and no unexpected toxic effects were observed. Capecitabine as third-line treatment showed a favourable toxicity profile, but exhibited low activity in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma after failing immunotherapy.     

Capecitabine monotherapy and in combination with immunotherapy in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

This prospective trial aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects and systemic toxicities of capecitabine monotherapy and capecitabine treatment combined with biological response modifiers in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Fifty-four patients suffering from metastatic renal cell carcinoma progressing under first-, second- or third-line treatment entered the trial. Capecitabine was given orally at a dose of 2500 mg/m2 daily divided into two doses for 14 days, followed by a 7-day rest in the monotherapy as well as in the combination treatment. This schedule was repeated in 3-week cycles. The combination therapy consisted of capecitabine and an immunotherapy treatment, which consisted either of interferon (IFN)-gamma1b (100 mg/day) administered consecutively 5 times weekly during weeks 1 and 2, and recombinant interleukin (IL)-2 (4.5 MU/day) administered on 4 consecutive days during weeks 3 and 4, every 6 weeks, or IFN-alpha (6 MioIE/day) administered 3 times a week. Fifty-two patients are now evaluable for response and 54 patients for toxicity. We observed a partial response to treatment in five patients (9.6%), minor response in five patients (9.6%), stable disease in 32 patients (61.6%) and only 10 patients (19.2%) showed continued disease progression despite treatment. Outpatient capecitabine was well tolerated. We did not observe any WHO grade IV toxicities. We conclude that capecitabine monotherapy and capecitabine treatment in combination with biological response modifiers appear to be effective regimens with favorable toxicity profiles in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Capecitabine monotherapy seems to be superior than the combination treatment because of its easier application form.     

Phase II trial of echinomycin for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma

Summary Forty-nine patients with metastatic or recurrent renal cell carcinoma were treated on a phase II trial of Echinomycin. Treatment consisted of Echinomycin 1.25 mg/m² intravenously every 28 days. Among the 47 evaluable patients there were no complete responses and only one partial response for an overall response rate of 2% (95% confidence interval, 0–11%). Eighteen patients (38%) experienced toxicity of grade 3 or worse. The most common toxicities were nausea and vomiting. The results of this study indicate that Echinomycin is not sufficiently active to warrant further trials for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.     

A phase II study of everolimus in combination with imatinib for previously treated advanced renal carcinoma

Purpose: This phase II study evaluated the activity of combined treatment with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and the PDGFR inhibitor imatinib in patients with previously-treated, advanced renal carcinoma. The primary endpoint was estimation of the 3-month progression-free rate. Patients and methods: Eligible patients had metastatic or unresectable clear cell renal carcinoma, at least one prior systemic therapy, no prior mTOR inhibitor therapy, performance status 0–2, and measurable disease. Treatment consisted of everolimus 2.5 mg p.o. daily and imatinib 600 mg p.o. daily. The primary endpoint was the 3-month progression-free rate. Results: The study was closed after the first 19 patients because of an insufficient number of patients who were progression-free at 3 months. The 3-month progression-free rate was 49% (95% C.I. 23%, 72%) and the median progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% C.I. 1.9, 6.2). Toxicities with an incidence of > 50% included nausea, elevated serum creatinine, edema, anemia, hypocalcemia, fatigue, diarrhea, vomiting, and dyspnea, and leukopenia. Conclusion: The combination of everolimus with imatinib in previously treated patients with advanced renal carcinoma did not result in a sufficient 3-month progression-free rate to warrant further investigation of this combination.     

ET-743: the US experience in sarcomas of soft tissues

Ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743) has shown promise as a new and effective treatment for soft-tissue sarcomas. Two independent, multicenter, Phase II studies have been performed in the USA for patients with unresectable soft-tissue sarcomas (either chemotherapy-na?ve or pretreated patients). The patients received ET-743 at a dose of 1500 micrograms/m2 as a 24 h continuous intravenous infusion every 3 weeks on an outpatient basis. Assessments were conducted every 6 weeks until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Responses were assessed in accordance with conventional oncological criteria and toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria. A total of 72 patients were enrolled: 36 patients to each study. Confirmed objective response rates were 14% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5 to 30%) and 8% (95% CI 2 to 23%) in chemotherapy-na?ve and pretreated patients, respectively. In chemotherapy-na?ve patients, 12-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 18% (95% CI 4 to 32%) and 49% (95% CI 20 to 78%), respectively. For patients with progressive disease despite prior conventional chemotherapy, 12-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 11% (95% CI 2 to 24%) and 55% (95% CI 35 to 75%), respectively. The median duration of response was 11 months. The durability of major responses in a subset of patients was impressive, as was the number of patients who achieved disease stabilization without showing objective response. Overall, ET-743 had a favorable safety profile. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia and transiently increased transaminase concentrations. ET-743 did not cause alopecia, mucositis, cardiotoxicity or neurotoxicity. The side effects were reversible, non-cumulative and manageable. There were no treatment-associated deaths. In conclusion, ET-743 is an active chemotherapeutic agent that can induce objective responses and clinical benefit in a subset of patients with metastatic or advanced soft-tissue sarcoma.     

A phase II study of tandutinib (MLN518), a selective inhibitor of type III tyrosine receptor kinases, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Therapies which target VEGF and mTOR are now available for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, but there is a continued need to develop agents for patients who become refractory to these initial agents. Tandutinib is a relatively selective inhibitor of type III tyrosine kinase receptor kinases with promising activity in some tumors. In this trial, 10 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma refractory to previous therapy with sunitinib or sorafenib (median age 61 years, 80% performance status 0, 60% intermediate MSKCC risk classification) received tandutinib 500 mg bid daily with RECIST-defined response as the primary endpoint and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoints. No patient had more than 2 cycles of therapy and 50% of patients only received 1 cycle with 70% of patients discontinuing for progressive disease and 30% for toxicity. Tandutinib was not well tolerated with dose reduction in 60% of patients due to adverse events. The most common grade 3 toxicity was fatigue (30%). Tandutinib had no clinical activity and due to the excessive toxicity should not be developed further in patients with sunitinib or sorafenib-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma.     

Gemcitabine plus docetaxel as first-line biweekly therapy in locally advanced and/or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a phase II study

The purpose of the study was to evaluate objective response rate, survival and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine-docetaxel administered on a biweekly schedule as first-line treatment in advanced/relapsed or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Treatment consisted of the sequenced administration of gemcitabine 1500 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) (2 h intravenous infusion) on days 1, 14 of a 28-day cycle for 6 months. A total of 33 patients, 22 men and 11 women, were enrolled, aged 41-75 years (median 64 years). The majority of patients had a good performance status (94%; status<2). Thirteen patients had locally advanced disease (39%) and 20 metastasic disease (41%). A total of 178 treatment cycles were administered with a median number of 5.4 cycles for a patients (range 2-8). Toxicity was primarily hematologic with the most frequent grade >2 being neutropenia (11%), with three episodes of febrile neutropenia. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were milder and had a lower incidence. The most frequent nonhematological toxicities were alopecia, followed by asthenia. Cardiac and pulmonary toxicity was minimal. No toxic deaths were recorded during study and follow-up. Overall response rate was 53.1%, including four complete responses (12.5%) and 13 partial responses (40.6%), whereas six patients (18.8%) had disease stabilization. Median time to progression was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval: 5.1-13.7), with a median survival of 14.8 months (95% confidence interval: 9.4-20.2) after an observation of 30 months (range 4-30+). The results of this study suggested that combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel administered twice a week is particularly active and well tolerated as first-line treatment in advanced and/or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Once data are confirmed in a larger study and longer follow-up, the favorable toxicity profile of this regimen may offer an interesting alternative to the cisplatin-based regimen.     

Multicenter phase II study of chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of metastatic melanoma

Combining chemotherapy and immunotherapeutic agents such as interleukin-2 and interferon alpha-2b might improve treatment results in metastatic melanoma (MM) patients compared with chemotherapy alone. This prospective study evaluated the potential efficacy of a biochemotherapy regimen followed by maintenance biotherapy for the treatment of MM. Twenty-two patients with stage IV melanoma were treated for 5 consecutive days with cisplatin at 20 mg/m, vinblastine at 1.6 mg/m, and dacarbazine at 160 mg/m. Pegylated interferon alpha-2b at a dose of 50 microg every week, subcutaneous interleukin-2, 1.8 MIU, and oral 13-cis-retinoic acid (13-cis-RA) at 0.5 mg/kg were given 5 days/week for 3 weeks each month during the period of chemotherapy administration. Maintenance biotherapy was continued in patients who had a complete or partial response or disease stability (clinical benefit) after six courses of biochemotherapy. The primary endpoint was response; secondary endpoints were the evaluation of the immunologic parameters, toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Twelve patients (54.5%) achieved a response, and seven (31.8%) maintained stable disease for at least 6 months with maintenance biotherapy. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 23.3 and 45.7 months, respectively. The most important toxicities from chemotherapy were grades 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 41 and 18% of patients, respectively, whereas grade 2 autoimmune reactions were observed in 21% of patients after maintenance biotherapy. A prolonged enhancement of immunologic function was observed in the 19 patients treated with maintenance therapy. A regimen of six cycles of biochemotherapy followed by maintenance immunotherapy is well tolerated, and shows significant activity in patients with MM.     

替莫唑胺联合全脑放疗治疗脑转移瘤的疗效评价

目的:评价替莫唑胺联合全脑放疗治疗脑转移瘤患者的疗效及安全性。方法:将55例脑转移瘤患者(转移灶>3个)随机分为替莫唑胺联合放疗组及放疗组。替莫唑胺联合放疗组予以常规分割行全脑放疗,DT:40 Gy(2 Gy.d-1,每周5 d),于放疗d1开始给予替莫唑胺口服治疗(75 mg.m-2.d-1),放疗结束后每28 d予以替莫唑胺口服5 d(200 mg.m-2.d-1)化疗,共6周期。放疗组全脑放疗,DT:40 Gy(2 Gy.d-1,每周5 d)。使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算生存率、无进展生存率及生存曲线,组间生存率比较应用Log-rank检验。结果:替莫唑胺联合放疗组与放疗组的客观缓解率分别为76.9%和48.0%(P=0.033);中位生存期分别为8.0和5.5个月,差异达统计学显著性(P=0.025);中位无进展生存期为分别为5.0和3.1个月,差异达统计学显著性(P=0.020)。替莫唑胺联合放疗组发生恶心、呕吐的患者显著高于单纯放疗组,但大部分患者可耐受。结论:替莫唑胺联合全脑放疗有可能提高脑转移瘤患者的局部控制及远期生存,且耐受性良好。     

Multi-institutional phase II trial of S-1 in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of an oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer agent, S-1, in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with pathologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma and at least one measurable lesion were enrolled. Oral administration of S-1 (40 mg/m2 twice daily) for 28 days was followed by a 14-day rest period. A total of 41 consecutive eligible patients were enrolled in the study between October 2002 and August 2004. The sites of the primary tumor were the gingiva (n=18), the tongue (n=12), the palate (n=5), the oral floor (n=4), the buccal mucosa (n=1), and the labial mucosa (n=1). A median of two cycles of treatment (range, 1-5) was administered. A complete response was achieved in nine patients and a partial response in eight patients, for an overall response rate of 41.5% (95% confidence interval, 26.4-56.5%). The 3-year survival rate was 76.4% (95% confidence interval, 62.8-90.0%). Although grade 3 anemia and anorexia occurred in two patients each (4.9%), and grade 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and diarrhea in one patient each (2.4%), no grade 4 toxicities were observed. S-1 exhibits definite antitumor activity in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and is well tolerated.     

A multicenter phase II study of the stop-and-go modified FOLFOX6 with bevacizumab for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Currently, no prospective data exists to support a "stop-and-go" modified FOLFOX6 regimen with bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this regimen in first-line mCRC patients. Eligible patients (age ≥20 years) had previously untreated mCRC; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2; and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. The modified FOLFOX6 regimen and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks. After 8 cycles, patients received maintenance therapy with simplified LV5FU2 and bevacizumab until completion of 8 cycles or disease progression. After maintenance therapy, patients received another 8 cycles of modified FOLFOX6 with bevacizumab until completion of 8 cycles or disease progression. We recruited 50 patients between August 2007 and January 2009. The overall response rate was 48% (80% confidence interval [CI]; 38.2-58) with outcomes as follows: complete response, n?=?1; partial response, n?=?23; stable disease, n?=?21; progression, n?=?1; and not evaluated, n?=?4. Median time to treatment failure was 7.7 months (80% CI: 6.2-8.0), and median progression-free survival was 12.8 months (80% CI: 10.8-14). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (40%), nausea (4%), diarrhea (14%), thrombosis (4%), and hypertension (4%) et al. Grade 1, 2, or 3 peripheral neuropathy was reported in 38%, 40%, and 10% of patients, respectively. The stop-and-go modified FOLFOX6 and bevacizumab regimen is effective and well tolerated as first-line chemotherapy for mCRC patients.     

Phase II trial of vinorelbine tartrate in patients with treatment-naive metastatic melanoma

Metastatic melanoma carries a dismal prognosis and there is a need to develop new treatment strategies. Vinca alkaloids have shown consistent activity in melanoma patients, as monotherapy and as part of combination regimens. The current study evaluates the clinical activity and tolerability of vinorelbine as first-line monotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients were eligible if they presented metastatic melanoma not amenable to curative resection, had received no prior systemic therapy for advanced disease and had an adequate performance status (ECOG 0-1). Patients received vinorelbine at a dose of 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, on an outpatient basis. Thirteen patients were accrued into the study and received 64 cycles. All patients were assessable for response, toxicity and survival. No objective responses were documented, for an overall response rate of 0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0-19%] and the trial was terminated in accordance to the predetermined early discontinuation rule. The median progression-free survival was 3.3 months (95% CI 2.3-4.3 months) and the estimated median overall survival was 8.1 months (95% CI 6.0-10.2 months). No life-threatening toxicities occurred. Neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity, but none of the three episodes of grade 3-4 neutropenia were complicated by infection. The most common non-hematologic toxicities were asthenia, nausea, neuropathy and myalgia. We conclude that vinorelbine as a single agent on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle has a favorable toxicity profile, but appears to have no relevant clinical activity in patients with metastatic melanoma.     

Biweekly administration of docetaxel and vinorelbine as second-line chemotherapy for patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the Galician Lung Cancer Group (GGCP 013-02)

The current report aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of a biweekly administration of docetaxel and vinorelbine to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, who had previously been treated for this disease. In a prospective, multicenter, open-label, phase II trial, patients received 40 mg/m of docetaxel and 20 mg/m of vinorelbine on days 1 and 15, every 28 days. Treatment continued for up to a maximum of six cycles, unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred, or consent was withdrawn. Fifty patients were enrolled in the study and they received 174 cycles of chemotherapy, with a median of three cycles per patient. All patients were evaluated for efficacy and toxicity in an intention-to-treat analysis. The overall response rate was 10% [95% confidence interval (CI): 1-19], including one complete response (2%) and four partial responses (8%). Previous chemotherapy of 80% of the responders included paclitaxel. Median time to disease progression was 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.2-4.3) and median overall survival was 6.5 months (95% CI: 2.5-9.2). The survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 18% (95% CI: 7-29) and 4% (95% CI: 0-10), respectively. The most frequent severe toxicities were neutropenia (20% of patients) and leukopenia (8% of patients). Other toxicities appeared in 4% or fewer of the patients. Biweekly administration of docetaxel and vinorelbine is feasible as a second-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer patients, but its level of activity and toxicity does not suggest any advantage compared with the results obtained with single-agent docetaxel in the same setting.     

Phase II trial of topotecan in advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

SummaryPurpose A phase II trial of topotecan, an inhibitor of topoisomerase I, was conducted in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas to determine the activity and toxicity of topotecan.Patients and Materials 35 patients, previously untreated with chemotherapy, received topotecan 1.5 mg/ m²/d for five days intravenously and repeated every 21 days. Patients were assessed for response after 3 cycles. Those with either clinical response or stable disease received additional cycles of the drug until toxicity developed or disease progression occurred.Results Among 30 patients evaluable for response there were no complete responses and 3 partial responses (10%) for a total response rate of 10% (95% confidence interval = 0–20.6%). Stable disease for at least eight weeks was seen in 11 patients (36%). Median survival was 19 weeks (95% confidence interval 11 to 26 weeks). Therapy was generally well tolerated, with reversible granulocytopenia being the most common toxicity.Conclusion Topotecan given on a 5 day, short infusion schedule, demonstrated limited activity in pancreatic carcinoma with minimal toxicity. Further exploration of topotecan in pancreatic carcinoma using different dosing schedules is warranted.