Acute diverticulitis--clinical presentation and differential diagnostics.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical presentation of acute diverticulitis in an emergency department and to characterize the natural history of diverticulitis in the short perspective. Comparisons are made with an important differential diagnosis, nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP). METHOD: Patients admitted to our hospital with abdominal pain of up to 7 days' duration were registered prospectively using a detailed schedule for history, symptoms and signs, from 1 February 1997 to 1 June 2000. Of 3349 patients initially included, 3073 (92%) were eligible for follow up after 1-3 years. RESULTS: Acute diverticulitis was the final diagnosis in 145 patients and NSAP in 1142 patients. The incidence of hospitalized patients with diverticulitis was 47 per year and 100 000 population, with a mean hospital stay of 3.3 days. Patients with diverticulitis, more frequently than NSAP, had a longer history and laboratory signs of inflammatory activity. Isolated left abdominal tenderness was more common in diverticulitis, whereas isolated right abdominal tenderness was more common in NSAP. Duration of symptoms on arrival was independent of age and was not correlated to C-reactive protein, leucocytes or body temperature. Sensitivity of diverticulitis as primary diagnosis was 64% and specificity 97%. Corresponding figures for NSAP were 43% and 90% respectively. Age and gender did not influence diagnostic accuracy or risk of surgery. CONCLUSION: Diverticulitis differs significantly from NSAP in clinical presentation and laboratory parameters. Sensitivity of primary diagnosis for diverticulitis and NSAP was low.     

Is abdominal wall tenderness a useful sign in the diagnosis of non-specific abdominal pain?

Pain arising from the abdominal wall has been implicated as a cause of non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP), and the presence of abdominal wall tenderness (AWT) has been proposed as an accurate diagnostic test for NSAP. One hundred and fifty eight patients admitted to hospital with abdominal pain were tested for the presence of positive AWT. In 53 patients the final diagnosis was appendicitis and positive AWT was found in five. Thirty eight patients were found to have a variety of other recognised pathological diagnoses, none of whom had a positive AWT. In 67 patients a diagnosis of NSAP was made in the absence of other pathological diagnosis, 19 of whom had positive AWT, which was significantly different from the other diagnostic groups. This study confirms the presence of AWT in up to 28% of patients with NSAP, and suggests that testing for AWT is of value in patients with abdominal pain, although a positive AWT is not as accurate a predictor of NSAP as previously reported.     

Diagnosis and treatment of enterovesical fistulae.

Presenting symptoms, diagnostic progression, etiology, therapy, and complications of 44 patients with enterovesical fistulae who came to three Yale teaching hospitals over a 9-year period were reviewed. Patients with diverticulitis as the cause of their fistula were older and came to the hospital with pneumaturia/fecaluria. Patients with pelvic cancer were more likely to have fecaluria, gastrointestinal symptoms, or hematuria. Patients with Crohn's disease were an average of 20 years younger than the patients with cancer or diverticulitis and they came to the hospital with pneumaturia, abdominal pain, abdominal mass, and tenderness. Computerized axial tomography scanning, cystoscopy, charcoaluria, and barium enema were useful in making the diagnosis; intravenous pyelography and colonoscopy were not. One-tenth of the patients were not candidates for operation, and one-quarter of the patients did not undergo complete operative resolution with restoration of enteric and urinary continuity. Nine patients underwent a two-stage repair consisting of resection/repair of the fistula with proximal fecal diversion and subsequent re-establishment of bowel continuity. These patients had a higher morbidity than the 19 patients who underwent one-stage repair. Enterovesical fistula is a challenging entity, the etiology of which may be suspected upon taking the patient's history or performing the physical assessment; however, the definitive diagnosis of enterovesical fistula can remain elusive. Single-stage repair can be achieved with low morbidity and mortality in many candidates.     

Why does the clinical diagnosis fail in suspected appendicitis?

OBJECTIVE: To identify systematic errors in surgeons' estimations of the importance of diagnostic variables in the decision to explore patients with suspected appendicitis. DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Two emergency departments, Sweden. PATIENTS: 496 patients with suspected appendicitis on admission, of whom 194 had a correct operation for appendicitis and 59 had a negative exploration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictors of a negative exploration expressed as the odds ratio (OR) for negative exploration. Variables influence on the decision to operate, expressed as the OR for operation, compared with the true diagnostic importance, expressed as the OR for appendicitis. RESULTS: Predictors of negative explorations were high ratings in variables describing pain and tenderness (patient's perceived pain, abdominal tenderness, rebound tenderness, guarding or rectal tenderness), weak or absent inflammatory response, female sex, long duration of symptoms and absence of vomiting, with OR of 1.8-3.0. Pain and tenderness had too strong an influence on the decision to operate whereas the lack of an inflammatory response, no vomiting, and long duration of symptoms were not given enough attention. There was no sex difference in the proportion of patients with non-surgical abdominal pain (NSAP) who were operated on, but NSAP was more common and appendicitis less common among women, leading to a larger proportion of negative appendicectomies among women. CONCLUSION: Negative explorations in patients with suspected appendicitis are related to systematic errors in the clinical diagnosis with too strong an emphasis on pain and tenderness, and too little attention paid to duration of symptoms and objective signs of inflammation. Rectal tenderness is not a sign of appendicitis. The risk of diagnostic errors is similar in men and women.     

Acute nonspecific abdominal pain: A randomized, controlled trial comparing early laparoscopy versus clinical observation

AIMS: To evaluate, in a prospective, randomized, single-institution trial, the role of early laparoscopy in the management of nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) in young women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women aging from 13 to 45 years, admitted for NSAP at the emergency department, were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, previous appendectomy, contraindications to laparoscopy, diagnosis of malignancy, or chronic disease. NSAP was defined as an abdominal pain in right iliac or hypogastric area lasting more than 6 hours and less than 8 days, without fever, leukocytosis, or obvious peritoneal signs and uncertain diagnosis after physical examination and baseline investigations including abdominal sonography. Patients were randomly assigned to early (<12 hours from admission) laparoscopy group (LAP) or to clinical observation group (OBS). After discharge a follow-up was carried out. RESULTS: From January 2001 to February 2004, 508 female patients without previous abdominal surgery were evaluated in admitting area for acute right iliac or hypogastric abdominal pain, in 373 patients diagnosis was established for obvious signs or with baseline investigations. Of the remaining 135 patients, 31 were excluded from study for various reasons, 53 patients were randomly assigned to LAP and 51 to OBS. Groups were similar for age, mean BMI, white blood cell count, and duration of pain. During hospitalization diagnosis was established in 83.4% of the LAP and in 45.1% of OBS (P < 0.05). Twenty patients of OBS (39.2%) were operated during observation because of worsening of symptoms or appearance of peritoneal sign. Diagnoses in LAP were appendicitis in 16 patients (30.1%), pelvic inflammatory disease in 7 (13.2%), carcinoid in 1 (1.9%), other in 18 (33.9%), no diagnosis in 11 (20.7%); diagnoses in OBS were appendicitis in 3 patients (5.8%), pelvic inflammatory disease in 8 (15.6%), other in 12 (23.5%), and no diagnosis in 28 (54.9%). Mean length of hospital stay was 3.7 +/- 0.8 days in LAP and 4.7 +/- 2.4 days in OBS (P < 0.05); no differences were found regarding mortality, morbidity, radiation dose, and analgesia. Mean follow-up time was 29.3 months (range, 12-60 months) for LAP and 30.6 months for OBS (range, 12-60 months). After 3 months from discharge, 20% of patients in LAP and 52% in OBS had recurrent abdominal pain (P < 0.05); after 12 months, 16% in LAP and 25% in OBS (P = not significant). Six patients in OBS required readmission for surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with active clinical observation, early laparoscopy did not show a clear benefit in women with NSAP. A higher number of diagnosis and a shorter hospital stay in the LAP group did not led to a significant reduction in symptoms recurrences at 1 year.     

Association of adult celiac disease with surgical abdominal pain: a case-control study in patients referred to secondary care

BACKGROUND: Acute abdominal pain is the most common indication for surgical admission. Nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) may account for up to 40% of cases. There has been no published prospective study in which adult patients presenting with acute abdominal pain are investigated for celiac disease. AIMS: We aimed to assess the association of celiac disease with surgical abdominal pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A case-control study was undertaken involving 300 consecutive new unselected patients presenting with acute abdominal pain (in a university hospital) and healthy controls (age and sex matched) without abdominal pain (n = 300). Initial investigations for celiac disease were immunoglobulins, IgA/IgG anti-gliadin (AGA), and endomysial antibodies (EMA). Any patient with a positive IgA AGA, EMA, or only IgG AGA in the presence of IgA deficiency was offered a small bowel biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. RESULTS:: There were 33 patients with abdominal pain who had positive antibodies, of whom 9 had histologically confirmed celiac disease (6 EMA positive; 3 EMA negative). One antibody positive patient (EMA in isolation) declined duodenal biopsy and the remaining 23 had normal duodenal mucosa. Within the control group, there were 2 cases of celiac disease. Compared with matched controls the association of acute abdominal pain with celiac disease gave an odds ratio 4.6. (P = 0.068, 95% confidence interval, 1.11-19.05). When only considering NSAP the prevalence of celiac disease was highly significant at 10.5% (9 of 86, P = 0.006). Patients' symptoms improved on a gluten-free diet at 12- to 18-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Celiac disease was diagnosed in 3% of patients who presented with unselected acute abdominal pain to secondary care. Targeting patients who have NSAP or celiac associated symptoms/diseases may improve the diagnostic yield.     

Medical comorbidities predict the need for colectomy for complicated and recurrent diverticulitis

Objective

The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for recurrent or complicated diverticulitis requiring colectomy.

Methods

A total of 112 patients were admitted to the West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center with the diagnosis of colonic diverticular disease from January 1998 to December 2006. Patients' records were assessed for demographics, past medical history, and physical and biochemical features of presentation. Student t tests, analysis of variance, and chi-square analysis were used to compare binary and categoric data.

Results

The medical records of 112 patients admitted to the West Haven Veterans Affairs hospital with the diagnosis of diverticulitis were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 97.3% were male (n = 109), with a mean age of 63.3 years, and a significant smoking history greater than 30 pack-years was present in 70.5% (n = 79) of patients. Eighty-four percent (n = 94) of patients presented with localized abdominal pain and 69.6% (n = 78) had abdominal tenderness without peritoneal signs. Computed tomography was performed in 85.7% (n = 96) of cases. A total of 23.2% (n = 26) of patients proceeded to laparotomy, with free perforation being the most common indication (38.4%, n = 12) followed by a history of 2 or more antecedent attacks of diverticulitis (23.1%, n = 6). Analysis of variance showed that serum albumin levels were significantly lower in the group undergoing colectomy compared with those who did not (3.4 vs 4.1 mg/dL; P = .016). The need for colectomy owing to complicated or recurrent attacks correlated with glucocorticoid use (P < .001) and a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < .038), but not with diabetes mellitus, collagen vascular disease, or inflammatory bowel disease.

Conclusions

The rules regarding the treatment of diverticulitis are evolving. Comorbid conditions such as hypoalbuminemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and glucocorticoid use may predispose patients to recurrent or complicated attacks of diverticulitis requiring colectomy. Stratification and reduction of risks may reduce the overall morbidity and mortality of diverticulitis.     

Ureteral obstruction secondary to acute sigmoid diverticulitis

Genitourinary manifestations and complications of sigmoid diverticulitis are well recognized. These consist mainly of bladder symptoms or fistula formation. Ureteral obstruction secondary to acute sigmoid diverticulitis is rare with only 3 cases documented and reported up to the present. All 3 cases were of left ureteral obstruction. Two patients are presented with acute sigmoid diverticulitis complicated by ureteral obstruction - one of which was obstructed bilaterally. Both patients were admitted with left lower abdominal pain and tenderness and showed elevated temperatures with leukocytosis. Neither had a significant past history of gastrointestinal or urologic disorders. Ureteral obstruction in both patients was documented preoperatively by intravenous pyelography, and postoperative resolution was documented following definitive treatment of the diverticulitis. The proximity of the sigmoid colon to the left ureter should cause more instances of this complication than is reported.     

Nonspecific abdominal pain is a safe diagnosis

AimThe aim of this study is to assess if a clinical diagnosis of nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) is safe and if patients with this initial diagnosis are likely to require further investigation or surgical intervention.Methods3323 patients admitted with NSAP from July 1990 to September 2012 utilizing a prospective database of all surgical admissions were included. Readmission over the period of the study and specifically within 30 days of their initial presentation was identified together with any invasive investigation or surgical intervention.Main results319 children (9.6%) were subsequently readmitted with abdominal pain at some point during the study period. Of these, 78 (2.3%) were readmitted within 30 days. 118 (3.5%) children subsequently had an operation or invasive investigation some point following their initial admission. Of these 33 (0.6%) had the procedure within 3 months of the initial admission. 13 patients had an appendicectomy within 3 months of the initial presentation. Of these histology confirmed appendicitis in 8 patients. This gives an overall incidence of “missed” appendicitis of 0.2 % (8/3323).ConclusionThis study confirms that a clinical diagnosis of nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) is safe in a pediatric population and the risk of “missing” appendicitis is only 0.2%. Patients and/or parents can be confidently reassured that the risk of missing organic pathology is very low.     

Early laparoscopy for the evaluation of nonspecific abdominal pain: a critical appraisal of the evidence

Background  

Patients with nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) are frequently seen in emergency departments. Different studies have suggested that early laparoscopy (EL) could be an adequate tool to accelerate diagnosis and therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of EL in terms of diagnosis, persistence of NSAP, mortality, morbidity, cost, hospital stay, and quality of life relative to observation in NSAP.     

A simple technique of portal vein resection and reconstruction during pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background: Cecal diverticulitis is a rare condition in the Western world, with a higher incidence in people of Asian descent. The treatment for cecal diverticulitis has ranged from expectant medical management, which is similar to uncomplicated left-sided diverticulitis, to right hemicolectomy.

Study Design: A retrospective chart review was conducted of the 49 patients treated for cecal diverticulitis at Olive View-UCLA Medical Center from 1976 to 1998. This was the largest-ever single-institution review of cecal diverticulitis reported in the mainland US.

Results: The clinical presentation was similar to that of acute appendicitis, with abdominal pain, low-grade fever, nausea/vomiting, abdominal tenderness, and leukocytosis. Operations performed included right hemicolectomy in 39 patients (80%), diverticulectomy in 7 patients (14%), and appendectomy with drainage of intraabdominal abscess in 3 patients (6%). Of the 7 patients who had diverticulectomy, 1 required right hemicolectomy at 6 months followup for continued symptoms. Of the three patients who underwent appendectomy with drainage, all required subsequent hemicolectomy for continued inflammation. Of the 39 patients who received immediate hemicolectomies, there were complications in 7 (18%), with no mortality.

Conclusions: We endorse an aggressive operative approach to the management of cecal diverticulitis, with the resection of all clinically apparent disease at the time of the initial operation. In cases of a solitary diverticulum, we recommend the use of diverticulectomy when it is technically feasible. When confronted with multiple diverticuli and cecal phlegmon, or when neoplastic disease cannot be excluded, we advocate immediate right hemicolectomy. This procedure can be safely performed in the unprepared colon with few complications. Excisional treatment for cecal diverticulitis prevents the recurrence of symptoms, which may be more common in the Western population.     

Pitfalls in paediatric appendicitis: Highlighting common clinical features of missed cases

OBJECTIVE: Missed cases of paediatric appendicitis lead to a delay in diagnosis and increased complications during the subsequent surgery. We aim to identify the common clinical features of such cases at the time of first hospital attendance. METHODS: Case records of patients with a missed diagnosis were reviewed retrospectively, documenting the presentation, preliminary investigations, initial diagnosis and eventual outcome. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients fitted our criteria over a 2-year and 5-month period. The rate of "missed appendicitis" was 7%. The commonest symptoms and signs were that of nausea and vomiting (74.4%), abdominal pain (74.4%) and fever (61.5%). The site of abdominal pain was rarely in the right iliac fossa (5.1%). The two commonest diagnoses made at first presentation was that of gastroenteritis (51.3%) and constipation (25.6%). Twenty patients (51.3%) were initially discharged home. Compared to those initially admitted, more of those initially discharged home underwent surgery delayed beyond 24 hours from first presentation. CONCLUSION: The paucity of symptoms and signs in the right lower quadrant does not exclude appendicitis. Gastroenteritis and colic constipation are the greatest masqueraders of paediatric appendicitis. A high index of suspicion, therefore, is necessary to avoid wrongful discharge altogether.     

Persisting pain after endovascular treatment of a symptomatic aortic aneurysm

INTRODUCTIONUsually patients are admitted to hospital with a single diagnosis, but if complaints persist it is important to consider a synchronous secondary diagnosis.PRESENTATION OF CASEA 74-year-old woman presented with severe abdominal and back pain. On physical examination, a tender abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was noted. Following endovascular treatment of the AAA, pain in the right lower abdomen persisted. Review of the pre-EVAR CT images revealed a foreign body in the terminal ileum, which was surgically removed.DISCUSSIONPatients with foreign-body-related intestinal pain present with complaints of abdominal pain at initial presentation. The accompanied back pain and abdominal tenderness of the abdominal aorta in our case could indicate another diagnosis.CONCLUSIONPersisting complaints post-intervention should not only arouse suspicion of an intervention-related complication, but also of a synchronous second diagnosis.     

Epiploic appendagitis — Is it an innocent condition? (Presentation of three cases)

Aim-Background

The aim of the presentation of cases is to point out a rare cause of acute abdomen. Epiploic appendagitis (EA) is an uncommon entity described as a rare cause of acute abdomen. EA can be secondary to torsion or thrombosis of the epiploic appendages. Its incidence peaks between 40 and 50 years but it can occur at any age. Men are more commonly affected than women. It can mimic diverticulitis or appendicitis on clinical examination. The lack of pathognomic clinical features renders diagnosis of epiploic appendagitis difficult.

Case presentation

Herein, we describe three cases of EA admitted to our hospital within the last two years. Abdominal pain was the main symptom in all patients. Since laboratory tests and x-rays were inconclusive, the patients were submitted to abdominal CT which posed the diagnosis of EA. The patients were treated conservatively and they all made a full recovery.

Conclusion

In patients presenting with acute abdominal pain not associated with other symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, fever or atypical laboratory values, the diagnosis of EA should be considered. Computed tomography (CT) features of epiploic appendagitis are quite typical and well described, rendering abdominal CT indispensable and the examination of choice in the diagnosis of EA. Accuracy in the diagnosis of this benign disease is essential in order to avoid overtreatment or unnecessary procedures for these patients.     

Abdominal pain as a cause of acute admission to hospital.

Between 1 January 1988 and 31 December 1989, 525 patients were admitted to one hospital with a diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Of these, 182 (34.7%) underwent an emergency operation and 14 (7.7%) of these patients subsequently died within 30 days. Death was due to intestinal obstruction in 69%, and there was a 28% mortality rate for emergency colonic resection. Non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP) was the most common diagnosis (36.0%), followed by appendicitis (14.9%) and urological causes (12.8%). There was an unnecessary appendicectomy rate of 25.0%. Admission with pain because of urological causes was over twice that of previous reports. Duration of stay increased greatly with age. Results from this study confirm the high mortality rate in the elderly from emergency colonic resection. Greater care in diagnosis and a conservative approach to appendicitis, with laparoscopy in females of reproductive age, may produce a lower unnecessary appendicectomy rate without an increase in morbidity. If the diagnosis of NSAP could be made earlier and patients discharged sooner, a large saving in resources would result. This early diagnosis is not yet possible.     

Afferent loop obstruction presenting as acute pancreatitis and pseudocyst: case reports and review of the literature

Afferent loop obstruction after gastrectomy and Billroth II reconstruction is an uncommon problem. Complete acute obstruction requires emergent laparotomy. However, chronic obstruction may begin insidiously and its symptoms may reflect other gastrointestinal diseases. Two patients are described who developed acute abdominal pain, marked hyperamylasemia, and palpable abdominal masses 5 and 15 years after Billroth II gastrectomy. The masses were initially interpreted as pancreatic pseudocysts. Both patients were found to have chronically obstructed afferent limbs, and in one the obstruction was associated with hundreds of stasis stones within the afferent limb. Surgical decompression was accomplished in each patient. Patients who have undergone Billroth II reconstruction have signs, symptoms, and laboratory findings consistent with acute pancreatitis. A history of previous gastrectomy, recurrent or severe abdominal pain, hyperamylasemia with characteristic tomography, and endoscopic findings will establish the diagnosis and necessitate surgical evaluation and intervention.     

Rare causes of abdominal pain: a primer for the admitting general surgeon

The broad uptake of the acute surgical unit (ASU) model of surgical care in Australia has resulted in general surgeons becoming increasingly involved in the management of patients with acute abdominal pain (AAP), some of whom will be labelled as having non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP) (Kinnear N, Jolly S, Herath M, et al. The acute surgical unit: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. review. Int. J. Surg. 2021;94:106109; Lehane CW, Jootun RN, Bennett M, Wong S, Truskett P. Does an acute care surgical model improve the management and outcome of acute cholecystitis? ANZ J. Surg. 2010;80:438-42). NSAP patients lack a clear diagnosis of surgical pathology based on standard clinical, laboratory and imaging work-up, although they may require ASU admission for pain control and assessment. This article provides a review of uncommon conditions, presenting as AAP, that could possibly be mis-labelled as NSAP, with a focus on aspects of the presentation that may aid diagnosis and management including specific demographic features, clinical findings, key investigations and initial treatment priorities for ASU clinicians. Ultimately, most of the conditions discussed will not require surgical intervention, however, they require a diagnosis to be made and initial treatment planning before on-referral to the appropriate specialty. For the on-call general surgeon, some knowledge of these conditions and an index of suspicion are invaluable for the prompt diagnosis and efficient management of these patients.     

Complicated diverticular disease of the colon, do we need to change the classical approach, a retrospective study of 110 patients in southeast England

Background

Complicated diverticular disease of the colon imposes a serious risk to patient's life, challenge to surgeons and has cost implications for health authority. The aim of this study is to evaluate the management outcome of complicated colonic diverticular disease in a district hospital and to explore the current strategies of treatment.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of all patients who were admitted to the surgical ward between May 2002 and November 2006 with a diagnosis of complicated diverticular disease. A proforma of patients' details, admission date, ITU admission, management outcomes and the follow up were recorded from the patients case notes and analyzed. The mean follow-up was 34 months (range 6–60 months)

Results

The mean age of patients was 72.7 years (range 39–87 years). Thirty-one men (28.18 %) and Seventy-nine women (71.81%) were included in this study. Male: female ratio was 1:2.5. Sixty-eight percent of patients had one or more co-morbidities. Forty-one patients (37.27%) had two or more episodes of diverticulitis while 41.8% of them had no history of diverticular disease. Eighty-six percent of patients presented with acute abdominal pain while bleeding per rectum was the main presentation in 14%. Constipation and erratic bowel habit were the commonest chronic symptoms in patients with history of diverticular disease. Generalized tenderness was reported in 64.28% while 35.71% have left iliac fossa tenderness. Leukocytosis was reported in 58 patients (52.72%). The mean time from the admission until the start of operative intervention was 20.57 hours (range 4–96 hours). Perforation was confirmed in 59.52%. Mortality was 10.90%. Another 4 (3.63%) died during follow up for other reasons.

Conclusion

Complicated diverticular disease carries significant morbidity and mortality. These influenced by patient-related factors. Because of high mortality and morbidities, we suggest the need to target a specific group of patients for prophylactic resection.     

Randomized clinical trial of early laparoscopy in the management of acute non-specific abdominal pain

BACKGROUND: Abdominal pain of uncertain aetiology (non-specific abdominal pain; NSAP) is the commonest reason for emergency surgical admission. The aim of this study was to examine the role of early laparoscopy in the management of NSAP. METHODS: Some 120 patients, admitted between November 1995 and October 1998 with acute abdominal pain of uncertain aetiology, were randomized into two groups: group 1 had laparoscopy during the first 18 h of admission and group 2 had close observation, conventional investigation and surgical intervention if signs of peritonism developed. Outcome measures were diagnosis, operative procedures, duration of hospital stay, readmission rate, morbidity and death, patient satisfaction and total number of investigations performed. RESULTS: Median hospital stay was 2 (range 1-13) days in both groups (P = 0.87). A diagnosis was established in 48 (81 per cent) of 59 patients in group 1 compared with 22 (36 per cent) of 61 in group 2 (P < 0.0001). The morbidity rate was 14 (24 per cent) of 59 in group 1 and 19 (31 per cent) of 61 in group 2 (P = 0.3629). The readmission rate at a median follow-up of 21 (range 1-35) months was 17 (29 per cent) of 59 in group 1 compared with 20 (33 per cent) of 61 in group 2 (P = 0. 6375). Well-being scores improved from 134 on admission to 149 of 177 6 weeks later in group 1 (P = 0.007) and from 132 to 143 of 177 in group 2 (P = 0.089). CONCLUSION: Early laparoscopy provided a higher diagnostic accuracy and improved quality of life in patients with NSAP.     

肝移植术后并发消化道穿孔六例报告

目的总结肝移植术后并发消化道穿孔的临床特点及诊疗体会。方法6例肝移植患者术后并发消化道穿孔,其中4例既往有腹部手术史。穿孔诊断时间在肝移植后7～12 d,确诊前2～4 d均有突发性腹部疼痛,但均能耐受,仅有1例腹痛较明显,上中腹压痛及反跳痛,其余5例腹肌不紧张,反跳痛不明显,6例均无明显的寒战及高热,5例的引流物细菌培养发现屎肠球菌感染,另1例未行引流物细菌培养。诊断明确后在全身麻醉下施行剖腹探查及穿孔修补术。结果3例(1例横结肠穿孔,1例胃壁、空肠穿孔,1例空肠憩室穿孔)穿孔直径较大,腹腔污染严重,手术过程中均出现感染性休克症状,分别于修补术后第2、9、33天死于多器官功能衰竭,另外3例(1例为回肠穿孔,1例为胃壁穿孔,1例为横结肠穿孔)的腹腔污染较轻,经穿孔修补术及营养支持治疗后痊愈。结论既往腹部手术史、医源性损伤及大剂量激素的应用,是导致肝移植后并发消化道穿孔的重要原因,而激素的应用使得患者的临床症状不明显,早期诊断、及时处理是治疗成功的关键。