Access of rural AFDC Medicaid beneficiaries to mental health services

This article examines geographic differences in the use of mental health services among Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)-eligible Medicaid beneficiaries in Maine. Findings indicate that rural AFDC beneficiaries have significantly lower utilization of mental health services than urban beneficiaries. Specialty mental health providers account for the majority of ambulatory visits for both rural and urban beneficiaries. However, rural beneficiaries rely more on primary-care providers than do urban beneficiaries. Differences in use are largely explained by variations in the supply of specialty mental health providers. This finding supports the long-held assumption that lower supply is a barrier to access to mental health services in rural areas.     

Rural-urban differences in access to Iowa child health services.

Indicators of access, utilization, and quality of available child health services as well as health status were obtained through a telephone survey of Iowa households with children under age six. These indicators were compared for rural-urban subsamples within an AFDC sample drawn from Iowa Department of Human Service files (N = 637), and within poverty (N = 129) and nonpoverty groups (N = 631) drawn from the population of all households in the state with children under age six. About 55 percent of all households studied were rural. Rural households were generally larger than urban households, more likely to be intact maritally, white, and earning a living from farming. The findings support the hypothesis that place of residence has an impact on access, utilization, and quality of child health services over and above family income, although not always to the disadvantage of rural children. Typical problems for rural children, irrespective of income, were access to pediatric care, greater travel time to providers, and discontinuity of well care and sick care. Rural children in all income groups had lower seat belt use than urban children; they were also less likely to have well visits and their providers showed less attentiveness to behavioral and developmental issues at these visits. Rural residency exacerbated problems in access to care for low income children, who were less likely to be eligible for AFDC/Medicaid than their urban counterparts. Medicaid coverage, however, did not eliminate rural-urban differences in receiving desired medical care.     

Rural Health Clinics and Diabetes-Related Primary Care for Medicaid Beneficiaries in Oregon

ABSTRACT:  Background: This study assessed whether Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) were associated with higher rates of recommended primary care services for adult beneficiaries diagnosed with diabetes in Oregon's Medicaid program, the Oregon Health Plan (OHP). Methods: OHP claims data from 2002 to 2003 were used to assess quality of diabetic care for beneficiaries residing in urban areas or rural areas with or without at least 1 RHC. Study subjects included Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) or disabled beneficiaries, aged 18-64, who were enrolled in the OHP for 12 months per study year and had at least 1 claim with a diabetes diagnosis (n = 6,267). Diabetes-related primary care was measured by the proportion of patients receiving each of 3 recommended tests at least once during the calendar year: hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), lipid profile, and eye exam. Logistic regression models were used to identify differences in testing rates across the geographic areas, after controlling for individual differences including age, race, sex, and health status. Results: Rural areas with no RHC had significantly lower rates of HbA1c testing, lipid profiles, and eye exams than urban areas (P < .01). Rural areas with at least 1 RHC had significantly higher rates for lipid profiles and eye exams than other rural areas (P < .05). No significant differences were detected in testing rates between rural areas with an RHC present and urban areas. Conclusions: RHCs in rural Oregon were associated with higher rates of recommended primary care for diabetes, consistent with the intent of the policy intervention.     

Reconsidering the effect of Medicaid on health care services use.

OBJECTIVE: Our research compares health care use by Medicaid beneficiaries with that of the uninsured and the privately insured to measure the program's effect on access to care. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Data include the 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey and the Survey of Income and Program Participation for 1984-1988. STUDY DESIGN: We predict annual use of ambulatory care and inpatient hospital care for Medicaid beneficiaries receiving AFDC cash assistance and compare it to what their use would be if uninsured or if covered by private insurance. Comparisons are based on multivariate models of health care use that control for demographic and economic characteristics and for health status. Our model distinguishes among Medicaid beneficiaries on the basis of eligibility to account for the poor health of beneficiaries in some eligibility groups. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: AFDC Medicaid beneficiaries use considerably more ambulatory care and inpatient care than they would if they remained uninsured. Use among the AFDC Medicaid population is about the same as use among otherwise similar, privately insured persons. Use rates differ substantially among different Medicaid beneficiary groups, supporting the expectation that some beneficiary groups are in poor health. CONCLUSIONS: Although Medicaid has increased access to health care services for beneficiaries to rates now comparable to those for the privately insured population, because of lower cost sharing in Medicaid we would expect higher service use than we are finding. This suggests possible barriers to Medicaid patients in receiving the care they demand. Enrollment of less healthy individuals into some Medicaid beneficiary groups suggests that pooled purchasing arrangements that include Medicaid populations must be designed to ensure adequate access for the at-risk populations and, at the same time, to ensure that private employers do not opt out because of high community-rated premiums.     

The health care experiences of rural Medicaid beneficiaries

Medicaid plays a vital role in rural America, yet, because of data limitations, little research exists on the health care experiences of low-income rural adults. We use data from the National Survey of America's Families, with its oversample of low-income populations, to examine differences in access to and use of care between urban and rural Medicaid beneficiaries, and between Medicaid beneficiaries and low-income privately insured adults in urban and rural areas. We find evidence that access to care under Medicaid is worse than under private insurance in both urban and rural areas; however, Medicaid beneficiaries have a more consistent level of access across urban and rural areas than do low-income privately insured people.     

Medicaid Managed Behavioral Health in Rural Areas

As of 2000, 21 states had implemented Medicaid managed behavioral health (MMBH) programs for a significant portion of their rural population. It is not clear how MMBH programs may work in rural areas since they are primarily designed to control mental health utilization. In rural areas the challenge is often to enhance service delivery, not to reduce it. MMBH programs may also affect important features of rural delivery systems, including access to care and coordination of primary care and specialty mental health providers. This article describes the implementation of MMBH programs in rural areas based on an inventory of states implementing MMBH programs in rural counties conducted between June 1999 and June 2000. The experience of MMBH programs in rural areas is also described based on case studies conducted in six states. All 21 states included the general Medicaid population (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families); 17 states included special Medicaid populations (adults with serious and persistent mental illness and children with serious emotional disturbances). Slightly less than half the states integrated (carved-in) behavioral health with physical health services in serving the general Medicaid population; only one state integrated these services for the special Medicaid population. Access to mental health care in rural areas had generally not been restricted. MMBH had little impact on the linkage between primary care and mental health. Local Managed Behavioral Health Organizations, formed by public sector entities and providers, played an increasingly important role in the evolution of MMBH.     

Issues in rural health: access, hospitals, and reform

This overview discusses articles published in this issue of the Health Care Financing Review, entitled "Access to Health Care Services in Rural Areas: Delivery and Financing Issues." These articles focus on the following topics: rural hospitals (including closures, the impact of Federal grants, network development, and costs), managed care in rural areas, telemedicine, and the delivery of mental health services to rural Medicaid beneficiaries.     

Disparities in home health service providers among Medicare beneficiaries with stroke

This study examined the intensity of home health services, as defined by the number of visits and service delivery by rehabilitation specialists, among Medicare beneficiaries with stroke. A cross-sectional secondary data analysis was conducted using 2009 home health claims data obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ Research Data Assistance Center. There were no significant rural-urban differences in the number of home health visits. Rural beneficiaries were significantly less likely than urban beneficiaries to receive services from rehabilitation specialists. Current home health payment reform recommendations may have unintended consequences for rural home health beneficiaries who need therapy services.     

我国基层卫生机构服务功能分析

基层卫生机构功能决定着基本卫生服务的供给。本文利用国家第四次卫生服务总调查以及专题调查资料,对城乡基层卫生机构服务开展情况进行了分析。根据经济社会发展水平、基层卫生机构服务能力和城乡居民需要解决的主要健康问题,本研究将基本卫生服务项目按照优先程度分为三个等级。约三分之一的城乡基层卫生机构尚不能提供最应优先开展的基本卫生服务;农村基层卫生机构服务能力与城市基层卫生机构相比更为薄弱,特别是村级卫生机构基本卫生服务能力需要加强;乡镇卫生院和社区卫生服务中心开展最优先项目的比例均不足70%;村卫生室和社区服务站开展最优先项目比例分别为62%和77%。影响基层卫生机构功能的主要因素为人员数量不足、人员能力不够、缺乏运转资金等。需要以基层卫生机构功能建设为核心,创新我国基本医疗卫生保健体系。     

Comparative effectiveness of health centers as regular source of care: application of sentinel ACSC events as performance measures

A 4-state (Alabama, California, Georgia, Pennsylvania) retrospective analysis of claims data from 1.6 million Medicaid beneficiaries to assess the performance of community health centers compared with other Medicaid providers (office-based and hospital-based practices) served as a regular source of care to Medicaid beneficiaries, each with at least one diagnosed ambulatory care-sensitive condition (ACSC). The health centers compared with the other Medicaid providers experienced one third fewer sentinel ACS events: 5.7 and 8.2 ACS admissions and 26.1 and 37.7 ACS emergency visits, respectively, per 100 persons. Controlling for case mix and other factors, the logistic regression results for sentinel events indicated that Medicaid beneficiaries who relied on health centers for primary care were significantly less likely to experience an ACS admission (OR = 0.89, P < .0001) or an ACS emergency visit (OR = 0.81, P < .0001) than the Medicaid beneficiaries who relied on other Medicaid providers. Sentinel ACS events can serve as efficient measures for assessing provider performance and comparing effectiveness of regular sources for primary care.     

Characterization of Rural Mental Health Service Systems

This paper explores two mental health systems in rural North Carolina that provide services to people with severe mental disorders. Recent findings show rural people with mental disorders receive less mental health care than their urban counterparts. This study asks whether rural service systems differ from urban systems in the way that their services are coordinated and structured. A popular conception is that public mental health systems in the United States are uncoordinated with many services provided outside the mental health sector. Rural service providers are seen as even more dependent on nonspecialized mental health providers than their urban counterparts. While many rural service barriers are attributed to the rural environment, little is known about rural service systems and how their organization might contribute to or negate barriers to care. Social network methods were used in this study to compare two rural with four urban systems of care. Findings confirm that mental health systems fit the de facto hypothesis, but that rural systems differ in ways not anticipated by the hypothesis. Rather than being more dependent on nonmental health agencies, rural mental health agencies are more interdependent.     

Cost shifting in a mental health carve-out for the AFDC population

This study tests whether the managed care vendor shifted costs to Medicaid-reimbursed medical care after the start of the mental health carve-out for the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) population in Massachusetts. We used claims data over a 4-year period to estimate expenditures for four types of health services, two of which were paid for by the managed care vendor and two by Medicaid. Total per person public expenditures declined by only about 3 percent. Inpatient psychiatric services were replaced by outpatient psychiatric services and some pharmaceuticals, but overall there was little or no evidence of cost shifting to the medical sector. These results are in contrast to what was found in a sample of Medicaid beneficiaries eligible due to a mental health disability.     

Systematic Review of Rural and Urban Differences in Care Provided by Home Health Agencies in the United States

ObjectiveHome health care agencies (HHAs) are skilled care providers for Medicare home health beneficiaries in the United States. Rural HHAs face different challenges from their urban counterparts in delivering care (eg, longer distances to travel to patient homes leading to higher fuel/travel costs and fewer number of visits in a day, impacting the quality of home health care for rural beneficiaries). We review evidence on differences in care outcomes provided by urban and rural HHAs.DesignSystematic review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quality appraisal.SettingCare provided by urban and rural HHAs.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search for English-language peer-reviewed articles after 2010 on differences in urban and rural care provided by U.S. HHAs. We screened 876 studies, conducted full-text abstraction and NOS quality review on 36 articles and excluded 2 for poor study quality.ResultsTwelve studies were included; 7 focused on patient-level analyses and 5 were HHA-level. Nine studies were cross-sectional and 3 used cohorts. Urban and rural differences were measured primarily using a binary variable. All studies controlled for agency-level characteristics, and two-thirds also controlled for patient characteristics. Rural beneficiaries, compared with urban, had lower home health care utilization (4 of 5 studies) and fewer visits for physical therapy and/or rehabilitation (3 of 5 studies). Rural agencies had lower quality of HHA services (3 of 4 studies). Rural patients, compared with urban, visited the emergency room more often (2 of 2 studies) and were more likely to be hospitalized (2 of 2 studies), whereas urban patients with heart failure were more likely to have 30-day preventable hospitalizations (1 study).Conclusion and ImplicationsThis review highlights similar urban/rural disparities in home health care quality and utilization as identified in previous decades. Variables used to measure the access to and quality of care by HHAs varied, so consensus was limited. Articles that used more granular measures of rurality (rather than binary measures) revealed additional differences. These findings point to the need for consistent and refined measures of rurality in studies examining urban and rural differences in care from HHAs.     

Treatment of Depression in Rural Arkansas: Policy Implications for Improving Care

Policy-makers have long suspected that greater barriers to care result in depressed rural residents being less likely to receive high-quality treatment. This study recruited 470 depressed community residents in a 1992 telephone survey, followed 95 percent of them through one year, and abstracted additional data on their health care utilization from insurance claims, medical and pharmacy records. Bivariate and multivariate models demonstrated that during the year following the baseline, there were no significant rural-urban differences in the rate (probability of any outpatient depression treatment), type (probability of receiving general medical depression care only), or quality (completion of guideline-concordant acute-stage care) of outpatient depression treatment. Annual expenditures for outpatient depression treatment were lower for rural subjects compared with their urban counterparts. Rural subjects had 3.05 times the odds of being admitted to a hospital for physical problems and 3.06 times the odds of being admitted to a hospital for mental health problems during the year following baseline compared with urban subjects. Cost-offset analyses demonstrate that every dollar invested in depression treatment was associated with a $2.61 decrease in the cost of treating physical problems in depressed rural residents. Limited insurance coverage and limited availability of services were the most significant barriers to specialty and general medical outpatient treatment for depression in both rural and urban residents. More than 80 percent of depressed residents in both rural and urban areas visited a primary care provider during the year following baseline. The potential cost offset of depression treatment in rural populations plus the improvement in productivity observed in both rural and urban populations indicate that it may be economically possible to improve quality of care for depression without bankrupting an already strained health care budget.     

Medicaid's role in ambulatory health care

Medicaid plays an enormously important role in ambulatory care financing, both primary and specialized, for patients with routine health needs, as well as individuals with chronic illness and disability. Nearly all Medicaid beneficiaries receive the vast bulk of their health care in ambulatory settings. Medicaid plays a critical role for low-income persons, including children, pregnant women and families, and elderly and disabled Medicare beneficiaries. The Bush administration's proposal to subject federal Medicaid spending to annual aggregate limits could be expected to have especially severe effects on states' capacity to support ambulatory services and achieve innovations in community-based care.     

Women's health services: restructuring for Medicaid managed care

New Jersey health care providers face the need to change dramatically the way health care is delivered as it enters a new era of managed care. This year, more than 24% of New Jersey's total population is enrolled in commercial managed care plans (New Jersey Department of Insurance, 1996). In addition, the state's Medicaid agency took steps to improve the delivery of health services to recipients by initiating implementation activities to transition from the traditional Medicaid program to a managed care model. Eighty-two percent of New Jersey's Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and related populations have already been enrolled in managed care. The state plans to expand enrollment in managed care to the remaining 400,000 Medicaid beneficiaries. Communities with high Medicaid populations are challenged with the need to move through the managed care evolution at an accelerated rate.     

Rural and urban differentials in Medicare home health use

This article addresses whether the use of Medicare home health services differs systematically for rural and urban beneficiaries. It draws on Medicare data bases from 1983, 1985, and 1987, including the Health Insurance Skeleton Write-Off (HISKEW) files and the Home Health Agency (HHA) 40-percent Bill Skeleton files. It presents background information on rural and urban beneficiaries and contrasts the use rates, visit levels and profiles, episodes of home health use, and primary diagnoses in rural and urban areas. The results point to higher home health use rates in urban areas and to a narrowing of the urban-rural use differential from 1983 to 1987. Rural home health users receive on average three more visits than their urban counterparts, with many more skilled nursing and home health aide visits. However, rural enrollees are much less likely than urban enrollees to receive medical social service or therapeutic visits, even after controlling for primary diagnosis. These findings point to the need for further analysis to understand the consequences of these differences.     

Consumer Perspectives on Medicaid Managed Care: A Comparison Between Rural and Urban Enrollees in One Selected Health Plan

This report presents the findings from a telephone survey of 313 respondents who have family members enrolled in Medicaid managed care in a multicounty region that encompasses both rural and urban counties in Wisconsin. Some demographic differences were noted between the rural and urban families that might affect their impressions of the health care system, their needs for services and their abilities to use those services appropriately. Families in the urban counties had poorer access to health care, as they were more likely to report at least one child not being assigned to a primary care provider. Inadequate preventive health behaviors were found among both rural and urban families, as evidenced by children being overdue for immunizations or health checkups. Yet respondents reported being happy with the care they received. Rural families in particular seemed to fare well in this managed care system.     

Is access to home health care a problem in rural areas?

In 1987, urban Medicare beneficiaries were 13.7% more likely than their rural counterparts to use Medicare home health care services. Regression analysis shows that rural use rates, particularly those in sparsely populated areas, fall short of those in urban areas, other things being equal. Rural areas have lower Medicare ceilings, proportionately fewer visiting nurse associations, and lower availability of auxiliary services. These factors combined account for 82% of the difference between rural and urban use rates.