Abnormal dexamethasone suppression test in primary obsessive-compulsive patients: A confirmatory report

The dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was administered after baseline cortisol measurements in 20 patients (10 males, 10 females) who met DSM-III criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Six patients (30%) showed an abnormal escape from dexamethasone suppression. DST suppressors vs. DST nonsuppressors showed no differences in age, rate of secondary depressive disorders, or scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory D scale, or OCD rating scales. Surprisingly, there was a trend for suppressors to have a stringer family history of depressive disorders, and for nonsuppressors to include an excess of male subjects. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between levels of cortisol before and after DST. In five of six nonsuppressors, both depressive symptoms and obsessive- compulsive behaviors showed a diminution in response to antidepressant therapy combined, in one case, with intensive behavior therapy. The relationships between OCD and endogenous depression, as well as the specificity of the DST, are discussed.     

The dexamethasone suppression test: interaction of diagnosis, sex, and age in psychiatric inpatients

A group of 277 semiconsecutive psychiatric inpatients manifesting a depressive affect underwent an overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) and a semistructured diagnostic interview according to DSM-III criteria. For major depressive syndromes (major depression with and without psychosis, bipolar depressed) the sensitivity of the DST was 63.9%, specificity 73.0%, and diagnostic confidence 72.3%. Additionally, a significant interaction between age and baseline cortisol values and nonsuppression rates was found in depressed males but not in nondepressed males nor in depressed and nondepressed females. The authors discuss the implications of these findings.     

Dexamethasone suppression test findings in subjects with personality disorders: associations with posttraumatic stress disorder and major depression

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies using the 1.0-mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in subjects with personality disorders have produced mixed results. However, these studies focused on major depression and did not consider the possible effects of the comorbidity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD has been shown to be associated with increased cortisol suppression. To investigate the effect of PTSD, the authors conducted a 0.5-mg DST, which is more sensitive than the 1.0-mg DST for detection of increased cortisol suppression, in a group of subjects with personality disorders. METHOD: Subjects with personality disorders (N=52) ingested 0.5 mg of dexamethasone. Pre- and postfasting blood samples were drawn for measurement of cortisol levels. A three-way analysis of covariance was used to test for the main effects of major depression, PTSD, and gender on percent cortisol suppression, with plasma dexamethasone concentration as a covariate. Secondary analyses assessed for main and interaction effects of age at which trauma(s) occurred and a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder. RESULTS: Neither major depression nor gender had a significant effect on percent cortisol suppression. Subjects with PTSD had significantly higher percent cortisol suppression than subjects with major depression. Age at which trauma(s) occurred and a borderline personality disorder diagnosis had no significant main or interaction effects on cortisol suppression. CONCLUSIONS: A high level of cortisol suppression was associated with PTSD in subjects with personality disorder. This finding is similar to published findings for PTSD subjects without personality disorders. Major depression, gender, age when trauma(s) occurred, and a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder did not have significant main or interaction effects on cortisol suppression.     

The dexamethasone suppression test in the clinical setting

The authors administered the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) to 47 inpatients on a clinical, nonresearch psychiatric unit who had been diagnosed according to DSM-III. Of the 30 patients with major depression, 23 (77%) exhibited nonsuppression (serum cortisol concentrations greater than 5 micrograms/dl); only 1 of the 17 patients with other diagnoses and depressive symptoms exhibited nonsuppression. There was no difference in the rate of nonsuppression between the patients with subgroups of major depression, but those with major depression and psychosis had significantly higher postdexamethasone cortisol levels than those with major depression with and without melancholia and those with diagnoses other than major depression.     

Dexamethasone suppression test in schizophrenic patients before and during neuroleptic treatment

The dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was performed in 21 drug-free schizophrenic patients. The patients satisfied DSM-III and Research Diagnostic Criteria for schizophrenia and were in an acute phase of the disease. In 15 of the patients the DST was repeated after about 5 weeks of treatment with neuroleptics. DST compliance was checked by analysis of dexamethasone concentrations in plasma. In the acute phase 71% (at 04 p.m.) of the patients were nonsuppressors. After neuroleptic treatment the frequency of abnormal responders had decreased to 20%. The decrease in nonsuppressors was not due to alteration of the dexamethasone concentration between the two test occasions. Prolactin levels were markedly increased at the second test occasion compared with the first. There were no significant relationships between cortisol levels, cortisol suppression and prolactin levels. The high frequency of nonsuppressors among schizophrenic patients in the acute phase of the disease indicates that acute stress may be a confounding factor in the outcome of DST.     

The clinical use of the dexamethasone suppression test in DSM-III affective disorders: Correlation with the severe depressive subtypes of melancholia and psychosis

The utility of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) as an adjunct in the diagnosis of major depression remains controversial. While the research utility of the DST has been confirmed, the clinical utility has been questioned. We studied 166 consecutive admissions to a general, non-research unit who either met DSM-III criteria for major depression or had depressive symptoms associated with other DSM-III diagnoses. Using a 5 μg/dl criterion, non-suppression of serum cortisol after dexamethasone was observed in 63% of patients with DSM-III major depression. Patients with the most severe subtypes of major depression (melancholia and psychosis) showed both the highest rate of serum cortisol non-suppression and the highest post-DST serum cortisol concentrations. These findings from the clinical setting where the test, if found useful, will be used ultimately suggest that the DST is both sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of major depression. Future research will determine the potential role of the DST as an adjunct to the clinical assessment and management of patients with major affective disorder.     

Dexamethasone suppression test and plasma dexamethasone levels in bulimia

A 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was carried out in 66 women with bulimia and in 26 age- and sex-matched controls. Blood samples were obtained at 4 PM on the day following dexamethasone ingestion, and levels of cortisol and of dexamethasone in the plasma were measured. Thirty-two percent of the patients vs only 7% of the controls had plasma cortisol levels of 140 nmol/L (5 micrograms/dL) or greater following the DST (a positive DST). The plasma levels of dexamethasone varied substantially, and there was a significant inverse relationship between the plasma level of cortisol and that of dexamethasone. Patients with positive DST results had lower levels of plasma dexamethasone than did those with negative DST results, and the mean plasma level of dexamethasone was lower in the bulimic group than in the control group. These results suggest that factors other than a disturbance of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity may contribute to positive DST results in bulimia.     

The dexamethasone suppression test: its relationship to diagnoses, severity of depression and response to treatment

1. The dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was applied to 40 depressed patients, 40 healthy volunteers and 40 patients with other psychiatric disorders. 2. The post-dexamethasone cortisol level, adopted as the non-suppression criterion and established locally, was 3.0 micrograms/dl. 3. The DST sensitivity in depression was 45%, with a specificity of 95% and a positive predictive value of 90%. 4. There was a significant correlation (r = 0.38, p less than 0.05) between HDRS scores of depressed patients and their post-dexamethasone cortisol levels. 5. A prospective study of the depressed group, which was assessed with three depression rating scales, showed differences between non-suppressors and suppressors regarding to the symptoms severity and response to the treatment. It suggests that an abnormal DST result could have a prognostic value to antidepressant drugs and ECT. 6. The DST specificity in depression was also calculated from its performance in the group with other psychiatric disorders, and their diagnoses as well as the abnormal DST results were critically discussed.     

The dex/CRH test-Is it better than the DST?

The dexamethasone suppression test (DST), frequently abnormal in mood disorder patients, is considered to measure glucocorticoid receptor-mediated negative feedback. We examined the hypothesis that the, apparently more sensitive, dexamethasone/corticotrophin-releasing-hormone (dex/CRH) test unveils subtle hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis disturbance not detected by the DST in 82 patients with mood disorders and 28 controls. There was a close correlation between the cortisol responses on the two tests (r(s)=0.73, p<0.0005). However, ROC analysis revealed that the dex/CRH test had better diagnostic performance than the DST (p=0.031). The sensitivity of delta cortisol (from the dex/CRH) was 61.9% and the specificity 71.4%. The sensitivity of 1500 h cortisol (the DST) was 66.6% and the specificity was 47.6%. This suggests that the two tests measure common pathology but that the dex/CRH test has better diagnostic utility.     

Cortisol suppression per nanogram per milliliter of plasma dexamethasone in depressive and normal subjects

It has been suggested that dexamethasone pharmacokinetics may affect cortisol suppression during the Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST). In depressed patients the cortisol response has been shown to negatively correlate with dexamethasone plasma concentrations, which also influence the sensitivity and specificity of the DST. These findings have been interpreted as weakening the utility of the DST. However, the analysis of pre- and post-1 mg DST cortisol concentrations corrected for plasma dexamethasone concentrations suggest that compared with normals (n = 52), patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) as a group (n = 71) had less suppressibility of cortisol to the same plasma dexamethasone concentrations. Moreover, when the MDD patients were evaluated based on DST status, the suppressors had cortisol/dexamethasone ratios (micrograms/dl of cortisol per ng/ml of plasma dexamethasone) similar to the normal controls, whereas the nonsuppressors had ratios that were significantly higher. These data suggest that DST non-suppression, as well as sensitivity and specificity of the DST in depression, is not only attributable to altered dexamethasone disposition, but indeed, there is a genuine reduced sensitivity of cortisol to dexamethasone that still points to an abnormality of the delayed feedback mechanism of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system in some depressed patients.     

Effect of hospital admission on DST results

The authors examined the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) responses of 41 patients with primary major depressive disorder and 40 patients with other psychiatric disorders who were tested within 2-6 days of hospital admission. Significantly more patients with primary depression who were tested on day 2 demonstrated abnormal cortisol suppression than those who were tested on days 3, 4, or 3-6 and than patients with other psychiatric disorders regardless of test day. These results suggest that patients with primary depression may be sensitive to psychophysiologic stresses associated with hospital admission and that the utility of the DST may require further evaluation vis-à-vis the day of DST administration.     

The dexamethasone suppression test in dementia: a review of the literature

To examine the utility of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in the differential diagnosis of depression in elderly demented patients, we reviewed the literature and focused on four components of this question: (1) cortisol nonsuppression rates in dementia; (2) cortisol nonsuppression and dementia severity; (3) cortisol nonsuppression in demented versus depressed patients; and (4) cortisol nonsuppression following antidepressant treatment. A combined analysis of 27 articles showed cortisol nonsuppression in 60% of patients with concurrent dementia and depression, in 47% of patients with depression only, in 41% of patients with dementia only, in 46% of patients with multi-infarct dementia, in 36% of patients with primary degenerative dementia, and in 10% of controls. The abnormal DST rate in demented patients was not significantly different from the abnormal DST rate in depressed patients. Eight of 12 studies (67%) did not find a significant relationship between DST results and dementia severity dementia patients without depression. Twelve of 13 studies (92%) did not find a relationship between age and DST outcome. The data we reviewed do not support the use of the DST in discriminating between depression and dementia or between dementia subtypes.     

The dexamethasone suppression test as a monitor of clinical recovery

To evaluate the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) as an aid in monitoring clinical recovery, the authors evaluated 127 outpatients with major depression who received the DST during depression and after clinical recovery. Although DST response varied among the 73 patients who met the Research Diagnostic Criteria for definite endogenous depression, their mean postdexamethasone plasma cortisol level was significantly higher during depression than after recovery. However, the DST's utility in monitoring long-term outcome was not great, as there was a high chance of remaining stable for 6 months after recovery regardless of cortisol value during depression or after recovery.     

Pretreatment DST and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical function in depressed patients and comparison groups. A multicenter study

Pretreatment measures of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HYPAC) function in depressed, manic, and healthy normal subjects showed that nonsuppression on the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) had less positive predictive value for major diagnostic category and was more frequent in normals (8/77) than recently reported, although it was yet more frequent in depressed patients (35/111). Nonsuppression was common in manics (8/16), was similar in unipolar and bipolar depressed patients (35% and 27%, respectively), and did not segregate with melancholic, endogenous, or psychotic depression subtypes. Patterns of post-DST plasma cortisol concentration other than simple escape or nonescape from suppression were common. Nonsuppression of 9 AM plasma cortisol levels on the DST had as good or better diagnostic specificity as nonsuppression of any of three post-DST samples. Nonsuppression was not completely synonymous with HYPAC hypersecretion. Means of pre-DST HYPAC measures (morning plasma cortisol, urine free cortisol, and CSF cortisol levels) were elevated in depressed patients compared with normals. There were significant differences in HYPAC measures of depressed patients studied at different centers. Age correlated positively and body weight negatively with plasma cortisol level.     

Inositol treatment has no effect on the dexamethasone suppression test.

The dexamethasone suppression test (DST) is a widely studied state marker for endogenous depression. Several drugs cause false positives or negatives in this test. Since inositol is a new treatment for depression it is important to determine if it causes artifacts in the DST. Five patients with major depression diagnosed according to DSM-IV underwent a dexamethasone suppression test before and after one and two weeks of 12 grams daily inositol treatment. Three normal subjects underwent the same procedure before and after one week of inositol treatment. Four depressed patients and all three normal subjects demonstrated pretreatment dexamethasone suppression of plasma cortisol. One or two weeks of inositol treatment had no effect on post-dexamethasone cortisol plasma levels in patients or subjects. One depressed patient was a non-suppressor before treatment and continued to show elevated post dexamethasone cortisol levels after one week of inositol treatment. However, after two weeks on inositol, when substantial clinical improvement was noted, he converted to a normal DST. Chronic inositol treatment does not seem to induce false positive DST results.     

Use of the dexamethasone suppression test in an inpatient setting: a replication and new findings

The dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was administered to 131 depressed and 109 nondepressed psychiatric inpatients. The depressed patients were categorized according to DSM-III as minor depression, major depression without melancholia, and major depression with melancholia and/or with psychotic features. The nondepressed patients were stratified over several DSM-III subcategories. DST nonsuppression was nonspecific for major depression: the mean post-dexamethasone cortisol value and the number of nonsuppressors were not significantly different between the major depressives and the nondepressed psychiatric controls. Within the depressive sample the DST was a significant (p less than 0.01) discriminator between major and minor depression. Postdexamethasone plasma greater than or equal to 3.5 micrograms/dl at 0800h was the most sensitive (39%) and specific (94%) criterion; cortisol values at 1600h and 2300h showed no significant discriminating power for major vs. minor depression. The diagnostic utility of the DST thus appears to be limited to confirming the diagnosis of major depression, once the clinical diagnosis of depression is made. There was no significant influence of age or gender on postdexamethasone cortisol values.     

Dexamethasone suppression test: use of two different dexamethasone doses

The endocrinologic methods used in the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) for depression were examined, by employing two different doses of dexamethasone (0.5 or 1.0 mg) at 11 p.m. Nonsuppression to the 1.0 mg DST (plasma cortisol criterion value of 5 micrograms/dl) was seen in 33% of major depressives and in 15% of schizophrenics. A similar result was obtained with the 0.5 mg DST when 12 micrograms/dl was employed as the plasma cortisol criterion value. Plasma cortisol levels 33 hours postdexamethasone did not distinguish between major depressives and schizophrenics.     

The dexamethasone suppression test and the diagnosis of depression in adults with severe and profound developmental disabilities

The dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was administered to 40 adults with severe and profound mental retardation. All participants were free from known conditions which may have given misleading results from cortisol assay. Of nine participants who showed symptoms possibly indicating depression the DST results concurred in two cases (i.e. there were two true-positives). However there were four or five (depending on criteria adopted) false-positive DST results. There did not appear to be a consistent behavioural profile for positive DST responders. With sensitivity to possible depression estimated at 22%, and a diagnostic confidence of <35%, these data do not support recommendations that the DST is useful for assisting in diagnosis of depression in this population.     

Abnormal results of dexamethasone suppression tests in nondepressed patients with diabetes mellitus

To investigate the specificity of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) for the diagnosis of major depression in patients with diabetes mellitus, we administered 1 mg of dexamethasone to 30 nondepressed diabetics and to 58 normal controls at 11 PM. Diabetic subjects received hemoglobin A1 (Hb A1) determinations, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), and five to eight blood glucose determinations during the 48 hours surrounding the DST. Results demonstrated a significantly higher rate of nonsuppression (plasma cortisol level, greater than or equal to 5 micrograms/dL) at 4 PM the following day among diabetics (43%) than among controls (7%) but no difference between these groups in the rate of nonsuppression at 8 AM. Plasma cortisol level at 4 PM correlated with Hb A1 level but not with duration of illness, HRSD score, mean blood glucose level, or maximum blood glucose excursion. These results suggest that the results of the DST used as a diagnostic test for major depression must be interpreted with caution in patients with diabetes.